putting research Overview of Results...Grade 9 EQAO Assessment of Mathematics 2017-2018 Overview of...
Transcript of putting research Overview of Results...Grade 9 EQAO Assessment of Mathematics 2017-2018 Overview of...
Grade 9 EQAO Assessment of Mathematics
2017-2018
Overview of Results
September 2018
Research & Accountability Director’s Office
putting research into practice
Peter Joshua, Director of Education Poleen Grewal, Associate Director of Instructional and Equity Support Services
Research and Accountability Department
Kim Bennett, M.Sc.
Research Officer
Paul Favaro, Ph.D.
Chief Research Officer
Marija Glisic, Ph.D.
Research Officer
Pat Hare
Administrative Assistant
Jeffrey Napierala, Ph.D.
Statistical Data Analyst
Aimee Wolanski, Ed.D.
Research Officer
Suggested Citation: Peel District School Board. (2018, September). Grade 9 EQAO assessment of
mathematics 2017-2018: Overview of results. Mississauga, ON: Author.
© Peel District School Board
TABLE OF CONTENTS Grade 9 EQAO Assessment of Mathematics: 2017-2018
Introduction...................................................................................................................................................... 1
Contextual Information .................................................................................................................................. 4
Academic and Applied Mathematics – Detailed Results .......................................................................... 5
Academic and Applied Mathematics – Trends over Time ........................................................................ 6
Academic and Applied Mathematics – Gender – Trends over Time ....................................................... 7
English Language Learners (ELLs) – Trends over Time ............................................................................ 8
Students with Special Education Needs (excluding identified gifted) – Trends over Time ................ 9
EQAO Results and Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index (SVI) ................................................................ 10
Grade 9 Student Questionnaire Results by Gender .................................................................................. 11
Tables Table 1: Contextual Information ........................................................................................................................... 4
Table 2: PDSB Grade 9 Student Questionnaire Results by Gender ............................................................... 11
Figures Figure 1: Summary of Results ............................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2: Academic Mathematics Assessment – Detailed Results ................................................................... 5
Figure 3: Applied Mathematics Assessment – Detailed Results ...................................................................... 5
Figure 4: Academic Mathematics Assessment – All Students – Trends over Time ...................................... 6
Figure 5: Applied Mathematics Assessment – All Students – Trends over Time ......................................... 6
Figure 6: Academic Mathematics by Gender – Trends over Time .................................................................. 7
Figure 7: Applied Mathematics by Gender – Trends over Time ..................................................................... 7
Figure 8: ELLs Academic Mathematics – Trends over Time ............................................................................ 8
Figure 9: ELLs Applied Mathematics – Trends over Time ............................................................................... 8
Figure 10: Students with Special Education Needs (excluding identified gifted)
Academic Mathematics – Trends over Time .................................................................................... 9
Figure 11: Students with Special Education Needs (excluding identified gifted)
Applied Mathematics – Trends over Time ....................................................................................... 9
Figure 12: EQAO Results and Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index (SVI)
Academic Mathematics and Applied Mathematics ...................................................................... 10
A
B
C
D
G
F
E
H
I
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 1
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
This report contains an overview of the 2017-2018 Education Quality and Accountability Office
(EQAO) provincial assessment in mathematics for Grade 9 for the Peel District School Board and the
province. Copies of the full Provincial Report can be downloaded from EQAO’s website, which is
located at: http://www.eqao.com.
About
EQAO is an independent, arm’s length agency of the provincial government that provides
parents/guardians, teachers, and the public with reliable and valid information about student
achievement. EQAO reports provide information for improvement, which educators,
parent/guardians, policy makers, and others in the education community can use to improve learning
and teaching.
EQAO develops and implements provincial assessment programs for primary, junior and secondary
school students in Ontario. EQAO assesses all students in Grade 3 and Grade 6 in reading, writing
and mathematics. EQAO also administers two secondary school assessments: Grade 9 Assessment of
Mathematics and the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (OSSLT).
Key Benefits of EQAO Assessments EQAO assessments provide data, information, and insights on student achievement for individual
students and multiple system levels.
Students know more about how well they are doing in reading, writing and/or mathematics and
what they need to do in order to improve.
Teachers and principals have more feedback on how well students are meeting the expectations in
the provincial curriculum and how effectively teaching strategies and school programs are meeting
students’ needs.
Parents/Guardians are more familiar with the expectations in the provincial curriculum and better
informed about their children’s achievement and progress.
Ontarians have accurate and objective information about student achievement and education quality
in the publicly funded education system.
Introduction A
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 2
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
About the Grade 9 Assessment
The Grade 9 mathematics assessment measures how well students have met the provincial
expectations in The Ontario Curriculum. The assessment covers knowledge and skills in
mathematics that students are expected to have acquired by the end of the school semester in
both academic and applied programs. Specifically, the assessment is based on the four
curriculum strands of mathematics: Number Sense and Algebra, Linear Relations, Analytic
Geometry (academic program only), and Measurement and Geometry. Students enrolled in the
applied mathematics program complete a different assessment than students enrolled in the
academic mathematics program. Students enrolled in first semester applied and academic
mathematics programs wrote the assessment in January 2018, and students enrolled in second
semester and full-year applied or academic mathematics programs wrote the assessment in May
and June 2018.
Please note that due to teacher job action, the Grade 9 EQAO Assessment was not written in the
2014-2015 school year by students who took grade 9 mathematics in the second semester, as well
as students enrolled in the full-year applied or academic mathematics courses.
Questionnaires EQAO conducts student, teacher and principal questionnaires to collect contextual data,
information about attitudes and behaviours regarding mathematics, and instructional practices.
The questions address factors that are associated with student achievement. (reference)
EQAO Scoring and Reporting
Written responses are carefully and systematically scored by specially trained educators using
rubrics specific to each open-response item. The scoring was rigorously monitored to ensure that
it was objective, consistent, and reliable. Multiple-choice items were machine scored.
(See EQAO: Ontario’s Provincial Assessment Program, Its History and Influence, page 15)
http://www.eqao.com/Research/pdf/E/ON_ProvAssessmentPgm_9612_eng.pdf
EQAO reports student achievement in mathematics using a four-level scale. EQAO has aligned its
four levels of achievement to those of the Ontario Provincial Report Card, Grades 9-12.
EQAO results are reported at multiple levels. Click the links below.
Levels of Achievement Level 4 The student has demonstrated the required knowledge and skills.
Achievement surpasses the provincial standard.
Level 3 The student has demonstrated most of the required knowledge and skills.
Achievement is at the provincial standard. Level 2 The student has demonstrated some of the required knowledge and skills.
Achievement approaches the provincial standard.
Level 1 The student has demonstrated some of the required knowledge and skills in limited ways.
Achievement falls much below the provincial standard.
NE1 Not Enough Evidence for Level 1 is used when students did not demonstrate enough evidence
of knowledge and understanding to be assigned Level 1.
No Data Students who did not have a result due to absence or other reasons.
Exempt Students who were formally exempted from participation in one or more components of the
assessment.
Grade 9 EQAO Assessment of Mathematics 2017-2018
Province Students (sample report)
Schools School Boards
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 3
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
Academic Course
Applied
Course
TRENDS
Summary of Results Percentage of students at or above the provincial standard
85%
84%
40% 45%
Figure 1
Province
Difference between
and
1%
-5%
Achievement results in this report are expressed as the number of students achieving at each level
as a percentage of all of the students in the grade. This includes students who were exempted, for
whom there were no data, and students who did not have enough evidence for Level 1.
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 4
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
Demographic data about students in the Peel District School Board (PDSB) and the province
provide valuable contextual information to help with the interpretation of the academic and
applied mathematics results.
Peel District School Board Province
Academic Applied Academic Applied
Enrolment
All students 7 666 2 170 96 996 33 451
Number of schools 36 39 677 692
Participation in the Assessment
Participating students (excludes no data) 7 608 2 083 96 145 32 142
Received one or more accommodations 3% 28% 3% 18%
Received one or more special provisions 16% 23% 3% 4%
Did not complete any part of the
assessment (no data) 1% 4% 1% 4%
Gender*
Female 49% 44% 52% 44%
Male 51% 56% 48% 56%
Student Status*
English language learners 22% 31% 7% 11%
Students with special education needs (excluding identified gifted)
4% 33% 8% 41%
Language**
Speak only or mostly a language other
than English at home 14% 11% 9% 7%
Speak another language as often as
English at home 32% 21% 17% 13%
School Background**
Attended three or more elementary
schools from kindergarten to grade 8 59% 56% 35% 39%
*Based on information provided by schools and/or boards through the Student Data Collection process.
**Based on data gathered from the Student Questionnaire completed by students.
Contextual Information B
Table 1
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 5
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
At or Above
Provincial Standard
1% <1%5%
10%
70%
15%
1% <1% 4%10%
70%
14%
No Data Below Level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
4%8%
16%
32% 31%
8%4% 5%
13%
33% 35%
10%
No Data Below Level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Academic and Applied Mathematics – DETAILED RESULTS Percentage of All Students at All Levels
Figure 2
Figure 3
C
Province
Academic Mathematics Assessment
Applied Mathematics Assessment
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 6
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
85% 83% 83% 84%
85%84% 84% 85%
N/A
N/A- Not Available
Please note that due to teacher job action, the EQAO Assessments were not
written in the 2014-2015 school year.
TRENDS
Academic and Applied Mathematics - TRENDS OVER TIME Percentage of Students At or Above the Provincial Standard
D
Academic Mathematics Assessment
Applied Mathematics Assessment
2013-2014
Province
2014-2015 2015-2016
2
2016-2017 2017-2018
2013-2014
Province
2014-2015 2016-2017 2017-2018
Figure 4
Figure 5
Academic Math results in the PDSB and the province have remained
relatively constant over the past five years, with a slight increase of 1% for
both the PDSB and province in the 2017-2018 school year.
Applied Math results in the PDSB and the province have decreased over the
past five years. The PDSB has been performing at a lower level than the
province for the past five years.
Province
5 years
1 year
5 years
1 year
0%
1% 1%
47% 45% 44% 45%
43% 40% 39% 40%-3% -2%
-1%
2015-2016
1% 1% N/A
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 7
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
-2%N/A 0% 1%
-1%
84% 84%85% 84%
86% 84%84%
85%
GENDER GAP
females-males
Academic and Applied Mathematics - GENDER – TRENDS OVER TIME Percentage of Students At or Above the Provincial Standard
E
85%
84%
-1%
42%
47%
Academic
Applied
Province
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Figure 6
Figure 7
Results for both males and females in the Academic Mathematics assessment in the
PDSB have remained relatively constant over the past five years. The gap between
males and females in the PDSB has remained relatively constant over time. For the
2015-2016 school year, the gap closed between males and females to 0%.
Female Male
40%
39% 39%40%
45%40% 39% 40%
-5%
Results for both males and females in the Applied Mathematics assessment in the PDSB
have been decreasing over the past five years. The gap between males and females in the
PDSB has been decreasing since 2013-2014 to 0% in 2016-2017 and 2017-2018.
GENDER GAP
females-males
Province
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
0%
-5% -1%
0% N/A
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 8
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
82% 81% 78% 79%
82%
78% 78% 77%
N/A
38%37% 33% 36%
39%
34% 35% 36%
TRENDS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELLs) – TRENDS OVER TIME Percentage of Students At or Above the Provincial Standard
Academic
Applied Figure 9
Figure 8
Results for ELLs in Academic Mathematics in both the PDSB
and the province have been decreasing over the last five years.
Province
Results for ELLs in Applied Mathematics for the PDSB decreased
from 2013-2014 to 2015-2016. However, the results for the PDSB
have been steadily increasing by 1% each year from 2015-2016 to
2016-2017 and from 2016-2017 to 2017-2018.
2013-2014
2014-2015 2015-2016
2
2016-2017 2017-2018
2013-2014 2014-2015 2016-2017 2017-2018 2015-2016
2
5 years
1 year
1 year
5 years
-5%
-3%
-3%
-2%
1%
1%
3% N/A
-1%
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 9
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
39% 37% 37% 38%
34%
27%31%
29%
74% 71% 72% 71%
75%
70% 71%
65%
N/A
TRENDS
Students with Special Education Needs (excluding identified gifted)
TRENDS OVER TIME
Percentage of Students At or Above the Provincial Standard
Tr
G
Figure 11
Figure 10
Academic
Applied
Province
Results for Students with Special Education Needs (excluding
identified gifted) in Applied Math in the PDSB decreased from 2013-
2014 to 2015-2016. There was a 2% increase between 2015-2016 and
2016-2017. From 2016-2017 to 2017-2018, the results decreased by 2%.
Results for the province have remained relatively constant over the
past five years. .
Results for Students with Special Education Needs (excluding identified
gifted) in Academic Mathematics in the PDSB have been decreasing
since 2013-2014. There was a 6% decrease from the 2016-2017 to 2017-
2018 school year in the PDSB. Results for the province have remained
relatively constant over the past three years.
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
2
2016-2017 2017-2018
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
1%
-2%
-6%
-10% -3%
5 years
5 years
1 year
1 year
-5%
N/A
-1%
-1%
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 10
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
85%83%85%86%80%
12345
Academic Mathematics
5%
0%
42%46%
26%36%
12345
Applied Mathematics
6%
SVI Group
Average SVI 52.8 47.3 42.3 36.2 28.9
Difference
SVI Groups
1 and 5
Figure 12
EQAO Results and Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index (SVI)
H
The graphs depict the relationship between EQAO results and five groups based on school SVI values. (Note: There are
six SVI groups, however, there are no secondary schools in Group 6.) The SVI is a measure of socioeconomic vulnerability.
The higher the SVI value, the greater the socioeconomic vulnerability. The percentage in the yellow circle represents the
difference in the educational outcomes between the lowest and highest SVI groups.
Decreasing Social Vulnerability
Difference
SVI Groups
2 and 5
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 11
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
Table 2: PDSB Grade 9 Student Questionnaire Results by Gender
Academic Mathematics
Students
Applied Mathematics
Students
Females
(N=3 429)
Males
(N=3 576)
Females
(N=845)
Males
(N=1 034)
STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD MATHEMATICS
Percentage of students indicating that they “strongly agree” or “agree” with each of the following statements:
I like mathematics. 53% 65% 32% 43%
I am good at mathematics. 47% 60% 28% 38%
I am able to answer difficult mathematics questions. 38% 57% 17% 31%
Mathematics is one of my favourite subjects. 36% 50% 18% 26%
I understand most of the mathematics I am taught. 77% 80% 64% 68%
Mathematics is an easy subject. 24% 36% 13% 21%
I do my best in mathematics class. 78% 71% 73% 67%
The mathematics I learn now is useful for everyday life. 32% 38% 36% 42%
The mathematics I learn now helps me do work in other
subjects. 60% 61% 49% 48%
I need to do well in mathematics to study what I want
later. 63% 71% 51% 59%
I need to keep taking mathematics for the kind of job I
want after I leave school. 58% 64% 41% 49%
Percentage of students indicating they feel “very confident” or “confident” that they can answer mathematics
questions related to the following:
number sense (e.g., operations with integers, rational
numbers, exponents) 68% 78% 38% 50%
algebra (e.g., solving equations, simplifying expressions
with polynomials) 71% 74% 45% 48%
linear relations (e.g., scatter plots, lines of best fit) 61% 71% 54% 63%
analytic geometry (e.g., slope, y-intercept, equations of
lines) 63% 70% N/A N/A
measurement (e.g., perimeter, area, volume) 72% 81% 67% 70%
geometry (e.g., angles, parallel lines) 68% 74% 42% 50%
Grade 9 Student Questionnaire Results by Gender
I
EQAO Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, 2017-2018: Overview of Results 12
Research & Accountability – Director’s Office September 2018
Table 2: PDSB Grade 9 Student Questionnaire Results by Gender
Academic Mathematics
Students
Applied Mathematics
Students
Females Males Females Males
DOING MATHEMATICS
Percentage of students indicating they do the following “very often” when studying mathematics or working on a
mathematics problem:
I connect new mathematics concepts to what I already know
about mathematics or other subjects. 14% 13% 6% 5%
I check my mathematics answers to see if they make sense. 38% 34% 23% 18%
I apply new mathematics concepts to real-life problems. 4% 7% 3% 5%
I take time to discuss my mathematics assignments with my
classmates. 21% 17% 10% 7%
I look for more than one way to solve mathematics problems. 15% 18% 12% 13%
Percentage of students indicating they complete their mathematics homework at the following frequencies:
I am not usually assigned any mathematics homework. 1% 1% 11% 9%
Never or almost never 2% 5% 4% 8%
Sometimes 13% 21% 24% 27%
Often 37% 39% 29% 33%
Always 41% 28% 25% 16%
OUT-OF-SCHOOL ACTIVITIES
Percentage of students indicating they do the following “every day or almost every day” when they are not at school:
I read by myself. 28% 15% 24% 12%
I use the Internet. 92% 91% 88% 86%
I play video games. 8% 44% 12% 47%
I participate in sports or other physical activities. 28% 51% 24% 49%
I participate in art, music or drama activities. 29% 17% 26% 16%
I participate in other clubs or organizations. 13% 15% 9% 12%
I volunteer in my community. 7% 5% 7% 7%
I work at a paid job. 1% 2% 3% 4%
Parents
This report is available on the Peel District School Board's website.