PUTNAM COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING …...Staff recommendation is for approv al of a 10 -foot side...

PUTNAM COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

117 Putnam Drive, Suite B ◊ Eatonton, GA 31024

706-485-2776 ◊ 706-485-0552 fax ◊ www.putnamcountyga.us

Agenda

Thursday, October 04, 2018 ◊ 6:30 PM

Putnam County Administration Building – Room 203

Opening 1. Call to Order 2. Attendance 3. Rules of Procedures

Minutes 4. Approval of Minutes - September 6, 2018

Requests 5. Request by David Tim Sherrod for a side yard setback variance at 106 Gloria Drive.

Presently zoned R-1. [Map 086C, Parcel 067, District 4].

6. Request by Charles Harrington for a side yard setback variance at 374 Cold Branch

Road. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 112C, Parcel 016, District 4].

7. Request by James Mallory, agent for Robert & Mariann Letson for a rear yard

setback variance at 106 Glad Cove. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 111C, Parcel 032,

District 4]. Request to withdraw without prejudice.

8. Request by Lemie Bales III, agent for Sally Hannah & Mary Long for a rear yard

setback variance at 139 Woodhaven Drive. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 110B, Parcel

084, District 3].

9. Request by Sandra G. Rivers for a side yard setback variance at 149B Southshore

Drive. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 056B, Parcel 206, District 4]. Item removed from

agenda.

10. Request by Gary Fowler for a rear yard setback variance at 124 W. Little River

Court. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 053C, Parcel 091, District 4]. Item removed from

agenda.

11. Request by Howard McMichael, agent for Janice Allred to rezone 1.65 acres at 1054

Greensboro Road, Units A-F from R-1 to C-1. [Map 102D, Part of Parcel 133, District

3]. *

12. Request by Alan W. McDade, agent for Lawson J. & Carolyn W. McDade to

rezone 12.46 acres at 142 McDade Road from AG-1 to AG-2. [Map 053, Part of Parcel

023, District 4]. *

1

New Business

Adjournment

The Planning & Zoning Commission meeting will be conducted pursuant and in accordance with O.C.G.A.

Chapter 36-66.

Notice: All opponents to any rezoning request on the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Board of

Commission agendas must file a disclosure of campaign contributions with the Planning & Development

Department within five calendar days prior to public hearings if you have contributed $250.00 or more to an

elected official in Putnam County within the last five years.

*The Putnam County Board of Commissioners will hear these agenda items on October 16, 2018 at 6:30 P.M.,

in the Putnam County Administration Building, 117 Putnam Drive, Room 203.

The full meeting package can be reviewed in the Planning & Development office upon request.

The Board of Commissioners reserves the right to continue the meeting to another time and place in the event

the number of people in attendance at the meeting, including the Board of Commissioners, staff, and members

of the public exceeds the legal limits.

The Board of Commissioners’ hearing will be conducted pursuant to O.C.G.A. 50-14-1 and Section 66-152 of

the Putnam County Code of Ordinances and meets the requirements of the Zoning Procedures Laws

established in O.C.G.A 36-66.

Individuals with disabilities who require certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe

and/or participate in this meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the

facilities are required to contact the ADA Compliance Officer, at least three business days in advance of

the meeting at 706-485-2776 to allow the County to make reasonable accommodations for those persons.

2

Backup material for agenda item:

4. Approval of Minutes - September 6, 2018

3

Draft Minutes

September 6, 2018

PUTNAM COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 117 Putnam Drive, Suite B ◊ Eatonton, GA 31024

Tel: 706-485-2776 ◊ 706-485-0552 fax ◊ www.putnamcountyga.us

Minutes

The Putnam County Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on Thursday,

September 6, 2018 at 6:30 p.m. in the Putnam County Administration Building, 117 Putnam Drive,

Room 203, Eatonton, Georgia.

Opening

1. Call to Order

Mr. James Marshall, Jr. called the meeting to order

2. Attendance

Mr. Jonathan Gladden called the roll.

Present: Chairman James Marshall, Jr.

Member Joel Hardie

Member Alan Oberdeck

Absent: Member Tommy Brundage

Member Frederick Ward

Staff:

Lisa Jackson

Karen Pennamon

Jonathan Gladden

Courtney Andrews

3. Rules of Procedures

Mrs. Karen Pennamon read the Rules of Procedures.

4. Approval of Minutes – July 5, 2018

Motion to approve made by Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member Hardie.

Voting Yea: Chairman Marshall, Member Hardie, Member Oberdeck. All approved.

5. Request by Phillip & Maureen Phifer for a front and rear yard setback variance at 126

Winfield Drive. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 111A, Parcel 125, District 3]. Mr. Phifer

represented this request. He stated that he is requesting a 10-foot front yard setback variance,

being 20 feet from the front property line and a 20-foot rear yard setback variance, being 80 feet

4

Draft Minutes

September 6, 2018

from the nearest point to the lake. Mr. Phifer stated that he is going to remove an existing

house on the property and replace it with a new house. He added that the lot length is 144 feet

and in order to place the house in the same location, it will require a variance. Mr. Oberdeck

stated that he had no problems with the request. No one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval of a 10-foot front yard setback variance, being 20 feet

from the front property line and a 20-foot rear yard setback variance being 80 feet from the

nearest point to the lake.


Voting Yea: Chairman Marshall, Member Hardie, Member Oberdeck. All Approved.

6. Request by David Tim Sherrod for a side yard setback variance at 106 Gloria Drive. Presently

zoned R-1. [Map 086C, Parcel 067, District 4]. Request to withdraw without prejudice.

The applicant submitted a request to withdraw without prejudice.

Staff recommendation is for approval to withdraw without prejudice.

Motion to withdraw without prejudice made by Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member

Hardie.


7. Request by Princeton Pirkle for a side yard setback variance at 120 Bourbon Point. Presently

zoned R-2. [Map 087B, Parcel 006, District 4]. Mr. Pirkle stated that he is requesting a 17.6 -

foot right side yard setback variance, being 2.4 feet from the right-side property line when facing

the lake for a storage building. He stated that he constructed the storage building in the only

reasonable place to put it which was onto an existing carport. He stated that the area to the left

of the driveway is the only way to gain access to his septic tank. Mr. Marshall stated that he had

visited the property with Mrs. Pennamon. He stated that the storage building was built without

a permit, variance approvals and was constructed 2.4 feet from the property line which is a

violation of the Putnam County Code of Ordinances. Mr. Marshall explained to Mr. Pirkle that

if he did not agree with the decision that was made, he has the right to appeal the decision to the

Board of Commissioners within 10 days. He added that Staff can provide him with information

on the appeal process. Mr. Pirkle stated that the subdivision map had no setbacks on it. Mr.

Marshall explained that all subdivisions are bound by the rules of the Putnam County Code of

Ordinances. He added that there is a plan review process for any new construction and this was

not done regarding the storage building. No one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for denial and removal of the new storage building in a timely

manner.

Motion for denial and removal of the new storage building in a timely manner was made by

Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member Hardie.


8. Request by Shane Robbins, agent for Edward & Ellen Cherof for a rear yard setback

variance at 104 Bass Lane. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 084C, Parcel 016, District 4]. Mr.

Shane Robbins represented this request. Mr. Robbins stated that the applicants are requesting a

25-foot rear yard setback variance, being 75 feet from the nearest point to the lake to construct a

5

Draft Minutes

September 6, 2018

house. He stated that Mr. Robbins has done a great job with planning the placement of the

proposed house on the lot. Mr. Marshall stated that he had visited the site with Mrs. Pennamon

and had no problems with the request. No one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval of a 25-foot rear yard setback variance, being 75 feet

from the nearest point to the lake.



9. Request by Chris Daniels, agent for The Three Daniels, LLC for a right and rear yard setback

variance at 149 Mockingbird Drive. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 030A, Parcel 011, District

1]. Mr. Daniels represented this request. Mr. Daniels stated that they are requesting a 10-foot

side yard setback variance, being 10 feet from the right-side property line and a 75-foot rear yard

setback variance, being 25 feet from the nearest point to the creek. He added that he would like

to construct a new residence in the same location as the previous house that had burnt down.

Mr. Daniels stated that there is an existing carport located in the proposed area which prevents

moving the proposed structure further from the creek. Ms. Jackson stated that when a non-

conforming existing structure is removed, the new development must be in compliance with the

ordinance. She added that the fact that it was 25 feet from the creek is because it existed prior to

zoning. Ms. Jackson stated that although esthetically that is where he would like to place it, the

board must adhere to the ordinances. She stated that their effort is to find the best possible

remedy, so he can rebuild, and they could see a possibility for him to increase the setback and get

as far from the water as possible. Mr. Daniels said the code specifically states that the setback is

from the lake, but this is a creek. Ms. Jackson stated that it is open water and it is considered the

same. She added if the Environmental Protection Division were involved, they would say it is all

considered State Water. Mr. Marshall stated that they are bound by State law to enforce the

Code of Ordinances. Mr. Marshall explained to Mr. Daniel that if he did not agree with the

decision that was made, he has the right to appeal the decision to the Board of Commissioners

within 10 days. He added that Staff can provide him with information on the appeal process. No

one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval of a 10-foot side yard setback variance, being 10 feet

from the right-side property line and a 50-foot rear yard setback variance, being 50 feet from

the creek.



10. Request by Bonnie B. Roberts to rezone 9.09 acres from R-1 to AG-2 at 365 Scuffleboro

Road. [Map 111, Parcel 001048, District 4]. * No one was present to represent this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval to table item.

Motion to table item made by Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member Hardie.


6

Draft Minutes

September 6, 2018

11. Request by Charles D. Carter to rezone 1.1 acres from AG-1 to R-1 at 127 Rockville

Road. [Map 117 Part of Parcel 028, District 3]. * Mr. Carter stated that he is requesting to

rezone 1.1. acres out of 9.08 acres from AG-1 to R-1 for an estate settlement. He said his sister

wants the existing house located on the property and they want to subdivide it out for her. He

added that this land also backs up to his personal property. Ms. Jackson read the staff

recommendation and explained that if the request is approved, all parcels must be re-platted

which include the parcel that is being subdivided and the parcel that is being added to the

adjacent parcel. She added that after both parcels are re-platted, both plats must be submitted at

the same time. No one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval to rezone 1.1 acres from AG-1 to R-1 with the following

conditions: (1) the 7.98 acres must be combined with the adjacent parcel: Map 117 Parcel 031

and cannot be used or sold as a standalone parcel, (2) this rezoning shall be conditioned upon

the resurveying and the recordation of all new plats as stated in Section 66-165(e)(3) of the

Putnam County Code of Ordinances.

Motion to approve with conditions made by Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member Hardie.


12. Request by Marshall & Angela Criscoe to rezone 15 acres from AG-1 to AG-2 at 355 Harmony

Road. [Map 072, Part of Parcel 010, District 1]. * Mrs. Criscoe represented this request. Mrs.

Criscoe stated that they are requesting to rezone 15 acres out of 84.27 from AG-1 to AG-2 to

keep 15 acres and sell 67.37 acres. No one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval to rezone 15 acres from AG-1 to AG-2 with the

following condition: (1) this rezoning shall be conditioned upon the resurveying and the

recordation of all new plats as stated in Section 66-165(e)(3) of the Putnam County Code of

Ordinances.



13. Request by Mary Margaret Oliver, agent for Estate of Diane Smith McIver and Claude L.

McIver, III to rezone 1.89 acres at 599 Pea Ridge Road from AG-1 to R-1. [Map 090, Part of

Parcel 002, District 2]. * Attorney Mary Oliver represented this request. She stated that the

applicants are requesting to rezone 1.89 acres out of 84.57 acres from AG-1 to R-1 for an estate

settlement. Attorney Oliver stated that she is the court appointed administrator of the estate for

the late Diane McIver. She added that Mr. and Mrs. McIver were joint title holders of this

property until Mrs. McIver’s death in a recent tragedy. Attorney Oliver stated that she is

carrying out the wishes of Mrs. McIver’s to leave 1.89 acres of this property to the Hernandez

family who have lived on this property for over 17 years. Ms. Jackson gave her condolences to

the family. No one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval to rezone 1.89 acres from AG-1 to R-1 with the

following condition, (1) this rezoning shall be conditioned upon the resurveying and the


Ordinances.


7

Draft Minutes

September 6, 2018


14. Request by Terry Aaron to rezone 3 acres at 706 Twin Bridges Road from AG-1 to C-2. [Map

057, Part of Parcel 002, District 4]. * Mr. Aaron represented this request. Mr. Aaron stated

that he is requesting to rezone 3 acres out of 25.7 acres from AG-1 to C-2 for a commercial use.

No one spoke in opposition to this request.

Staff recommendation is for approval to rezone 3 acres from AG-1 to C-2 with the following

condition: (1) this rezoning shall be conditioned upon the resurveying and the recordation of

all new plats as stated in Section 66-165(e)(3) of the Putnam County Code of Ordinances.



Mr. Princeton Pirkle spoke to motion to reopen agenda item 7.

Motion to reopen item number 7 made by Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member Hardie.


Motion to put item number 7 back on table made by Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member

Hardie.


Motion to table item number 7 made by Member Oberdeck, Seconded by Member Hardie.


New Business:

None

Adjournment Meeting adjourned 7:20 p.m.

Attest:

_____________ _______________ Lisa Jackson James Marshall, Jr.

Director Chairman

8


5. Request by David Tim Sherrod for a side yard setback variance at 106 Gloria Drive.

Presently zoned R-1. [Map 086C, Parcel 067, District 4].

9



September 24, 2018

TO: Planning & Zoning Commission

FROM: Lisa Jackson

RE: Staff Recommendation for Public Hearing Agenda on 10/4/2018

5. Request by David Tim Sherrod for a side yard setback variance at 106 Gloria Drive. Presently

zoned R-1. [Map 086C, Parcel 067, District 4]. The applicant is requesting a 13-foot side yard

setback variance, being 7 feet from the right-side property line when facing the lake to construct

a (20’x24’) 480-square foot carport. This is a narrow lot with the lot width at building setback

of 90 feet and lot length of 194 feet. The applicant is proposing to keep the proposed structure

in line with the existing 1,780 square foot house which is 9 feet from the right-side property

line. There is limited buildable area on the front side of this property due to the narrowness of

the lot and in the rear of this property due to the septic system and drain lines. Due to the

narrowness of this lot the proposed location is the only suitable option for the proposed carport.

Therefore, this request meets the conditions as stated in Putnam County, Code of Ordinances,

Chapter 66-157(c)(1).


from the right-side property line when facing the lake.

10


6. Request by Charles Harrington for a side yard setback variance at 374 Cold Branch

Road. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 112C, Parcel 016, District 4 ].

18



September 24, 2018


FROM: Lisa Jackson


6. Request by Charles Harrington for a side yard setback variance at 374 Cold Branch Road.

Presently zoned R-2. [Map 112C, Parcel 016, District 4]. The applicant is requesting a 10-

foot side yard setback variance, being 10 feet from the right-side property line when facing the

lake to construct a (44’x24’) 1,056 square foot carport/storage building. This is a long, narrow

lot with the lot width at building setback of 86 feet and lot length of 636 feet. The applicant is

proposing to keep the proposed structure in line with the existing 1,248 house which is 11.4 feet

from the right-side property line. Placing the carport in line with the existing house on the left

side of the house would not allow an adequate turn radius into the carport. Due to the

narrowness of this lot the proposed location is the only suitable option for the proposed carport.

Therefore, this request meets the conditions as stated in Putnam County, Code of Ordinances,

Chapter 66-157(c)(1).


from the right-side property line when facing the lake.

19


8. Request by Lemie Bales III, agent for Sally Hannah & Mary Long for a rear yard

setback variance at 139 Woodhaven Drive. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 110B, Parcel

084, District 3 ].

31



September 24, 2018


FROM: Lisa Jackson


8. Request by Lemie Bales III, agent for Sally Hannah & Mary Long for a rear yard setback

variance at 139 Woodhaven Drive. Presently zoned R-2. [Map 110B, Parcel 084, District 3].

The applicant is requesting a 13.4-foot rear yard setback variance, being 86.6 feet from the

nearest point to the lake on the rear right side of the house when facing the lake and a 42.10-foot

rear yard setback variance, being 57.9 feet from the nearest point to the lake on the rear left side

of the house to construct a (10’x28’) 280 square foot porch. This is a long, narrow lot which

widens toward the lake. The lot length at building setback is 400 feet and the lot width is 210

feet. The rear left corner of the existing 3,781 square foot house is approximately 90 feet from

the lake. The applicant is proposing to enclose an open deck for a family room and add the

proposed porch onto the rear of the house. This improvement will encroach upon the 100-foot

lake setback requirement. Due to the location of the existing house the proposed location is the

only suitable option for the proposed porch. Therefore, this request meets the conditions as

stated in Putnam County, Code of Ordinances, Chapter 66-157(c)(2).

Staff recommendation is for approval of a 13.4-foot rear yard setback variance, being 86.6

feet from the nearest point to the lake and a 42.10-foot rear left yard setback variance, being

57.9 feet from the nearest point to the lake

32



Greensboro Road, Units A-F from R-1 to C-1. [Map 102D, Part of Parcel 133, District

3]. *

43



September 24, 2018


FROM: Lisa Jackson



Greensboro Road, Units A-F from R-1 to C-1. [Map 102D, Part of Parcel 133, District 3]. *

The applicant is requesting to rezone 1.65 acres from R-1 to C-1. This property is located

behind an existing commercial business, Jerry’s Bait and Tackle. There are several structures

on this property that have been utilized for general commercial use. One of the structures is

built on both parcels. The applicant would like to combine this parcel with the adjacent C-1

zoned parcel (Map 102D, Parcel 135) but must rezone it to conform to the zoning regulations.

The proposed use is commercial which is consistent with the existing and proposed use. The

adjacent and nearby properties are zoned C-1 and R-1 which is suitable to the proposed use in

the C-1 District. The proposed use will not affect the existing use, value or usability of adjacent

or nearby properties. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use indicates the future land use

as Commercial and meets the intended use. The proposed C-1 zoning will have minimal

impact on Greensboro Road or adjacent properties. The current zoning is (R-1) residential, and

it is being used as commercial and needs to be brought into code compliance. The proposed

use will not cause an excessive or burdensome use of public facilities or services.

Staff recommendation is for approval to rezone 1.65 acres from R-1 to C-1 with the



Ordinances

44


12. Request by Alan W. McDade, agent for Lawson J. & Carolyn W. McDade to

rezone 12.46 acres at 142 McDade Road from AG-1 to AG-2. [Map 053, Part of Parcel

023, District 4]. *

64



September 24, 2018


FROM: Lisa Jackson


12. Request by Alan W. McDade, agent for Lawson J. & Carolyn W. McDade to rezone 12.46

acres at 142 McDade Road from AG-1 to AG-2. [Map 053, Part of Parcel 023, District 4]. *

The applicant is requesting to rezone 12.46 acres out of 64.23 acres from AG-1 to AG-2. The

minimum lot size in the AG-1 district is 20 acres so to subdivide the property it must be

rezoned to a conforming zoning district. The proposed use is agriculture which is consistent

with the existing and proposed use. The applicant is proposing to sell 5-acre tracts. The 51.77

acres will remain in AG-1. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use indicates the future land

use as Residential. Due to the proposed use of the property it would need to be brought into a

conforming zoning district. Currently there are AG-1 zoned properties in the same proximity,

which is suitable to the proposed use in the AG-2 district. Therefore, the proposed use will not

affect the existing use value or usability of adjacent or nearby properties. The AG-2 zoning will

have minimal impact on McDade Road or adjacent properties. The proposed use will not cause

an excessive or burdensome use of public facilities or services.

Staff recommendation is for approval to rezone 12.46 acres from AG-1 to AG-2 with the



Ordinances

65

PUTNAM COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING …...Staff recommendation is for approv al of a 10 -foot side...

Documents

Transcript of PUTNAM COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING …...Staff recommendation is for approv al of a 10 -foot side...