Purpose of workshop
description
Transcript of Purpose of workshop
Vice-Chancellor Awards for Teaching Excellence
Workshops
August 2013Conducted by Associate Professor
Lorraine Bennett
Purpose of workshop
• Give an overview of the awards
• Explain criteria
• Give advice on putting your nomination together
• Confirm due date and submission process
Overview of awards
Citations – outstanding contribution to student learning
• individuals or teams, full-time and part-time academic and professional
• significant contribution to student learning, engagement and/or overall student experience
• specific area (need to tell your story)• sustained period
Up to 10 Citations of $1,000 each
Teaching award
• for teachers (individuals and teams) • renowned for the excellence of their teaching (national
international profile)• outstanding presentation skills • made a broad and deep contribution to enhancing the
quality of learning and teaching at the University of Ballarat
One Award of $5,000
Criteria
• Citation nominations must address one of the following criteria
• Award nomination must address all of these criteria
Criteria• Approaches to the support of learning and teaching
that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn.• Development of curricula, resources and services
that reflect a command of the field. • Approaches to assessment, feedback and learning
support that foster independent learning. • Respect and support for the development of students
as individuals. • Scholarly activities and service innovations that have
influenced and enhanced learning and teaching.
Advice on putting nomination together
Citations must be limited to a maximum of 4 pages• Page 1 set up your story – the nature of your work
(context), describe the students you work with, the essence of your approach
A key is to work out your citation statement
25 words (max)
Eg For effective and sustained contribution to…….
Page 2 and 3
Identify your selection criteria and nominate at least 3 to 4 themes within this criteria
• For example if you select ‘approaches that motivate, influence and inspire….’ your sub-sections for discussion might be
• Use of interactive teaching methods• Weekly quizzes and feedback processes• Use of authentic industry-based scenarios
Need 2-3 examples for each sub-theme
• If you chose interactive teaching methods as a sub-theme you need to give 2-3 specific examples
• Identify course, topic and how the interaction occurs
Evidence
• This is critical to your nomination.• You need to identity and locate what evidence you have
to support your sub-themes.
You need to try to draw upon a range of qualitative and quantitative data• Eg student performance data, surveys on satisfaction
and teaching, peer feedback, supervisor’s reports, learning outcome/artefacts……trend data is important to show sustained impact
Pages 2 and 3 and perhaps into page 4
Suggested approach
• Identify your sub-themes• Think of 2-3 examples for each• Provide evidence of the impact on student
engagement and learning
Page 4 make sure you provide a conclusion
• Your conclusion should reinforce your main contribution as set out in your nomination
• Leave the assessor with no doubt and remind them of the range of evidence you have used to support your claims
Other things you need for the citation nomination
• A reference from your head of school or director (1 A4 page max)
• The completed nomination form on the CLIPP website
Teaching award nominations require further information
• See website• http://policy.ballarat.edu.au/learning_and_teaching/prizes/vcawards/ch01.php
Completed nominations to be submitted to [email protected]
by Monday 30th September 2013
Please go to this site to assist you prepare your nomination
http://policy.ballarat.edu.au/learning_and_teaching/prizes/vcawards/ch01.php