Punjab

STATE PROFILES – PUNJAB

ECONOMIC CHALLENGE FOR CHIEF MINISTERS IN 2012

Achieving Fiscal Stability

Enhancing State Competitiveness

• Competitiveness is the only way to achieve sustainable job growth, improving incomes and stable public finances

• Creating a clear economic strategy for the state that engages all stakeholders is even more important in times of budget cutting and austerity

4 Major

Pillars

12 Sub Indices

350* Indicators

HIERARCHY OF MEASUREMENT OF STATE COMPETITIVENESS INDEX

* Approximate figure

STAGES OF THE ECONOMY

Innovation Driven Economies (Per capita GDP 900 to 1300 USD)

Transition Economies (Per capita GDP 800 to 900 USD)

Investment Driven Economies (Per capita GDP 500 to 800 USD)

Evolving / Changeover Economies (Per capita GDP 400 to 500 USD)

Factor Driven Economies(Per capita GDP < 400 USD)

City States (Per capita GDP>1300 USD)

CategorizationMicroeconomic Competitiveness Ranks

City States (Per capita Incomes >1300 USD)Delhi 1

Goa 2

Innovation Driven Economies (Per capita Incomes 900 to1300 USD)Haryana 1

Maharashtra 2

Gujarat 3

Kerala 4

Transition Economies (Per capita Incomes 800 to 900 USD) Punjab 1

Tamil Nadu 2

Himachal Pradesh 3

Investment Driven Economies (Per capita Incomes 500 to 800 USD)Andhra Pradesh 1

Karnataka 2

Uttarakhand 3

West Bengal 4

Chhattisgarh 5

Sikkim 6

Mizoram 7

Meghalaya 8

Arunachal Pradesh 9

Tripura 10

Evolving/ Changeover Economies (Per capita Incomes 400 to 500 USD) Rajasthan 1

Jharkhand 2

Orissa 3

Jammu and Kashmir 4

Factor Driven Economies(Per capita Incomes < 500 USD) Bihar 1

Madhya Pradesh 2

Assam 3

Uttar Pradesh 4

Manipur 5

Nagaland 6

STATES ACCORDING TO CATEGORIZATION

Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

NEAR TERM STATE PROSPERITY PERFORMANCE

Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh

Punjab

Haryana

Uttar Pradesh

Rajasthan

Delhi

Uttarakhand

Bihar

Orissa

West Bengal

Assam

Meghalaya

Tripura

Mizoram

Manipur

Nagaland

Arunachal Pradesh

Sikkim

Jharkhand

Gujarat

Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

Chhattisgarh

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala

Tamil Nadu

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000

Gross Domestic Product per Capita, 2011

Gro

ss D

om

est

ic P

rod

uct

pe

r C

apit

a re

al g

row

th r

ate

, 20

08

-20

11

All In

dia

Average

57

.28

In

dex

Poin

ts

All India GSDP /Capita rate (CAGR) of 6.27 %

All India Average of 47,998 Rupees/capita

Highly Productive and Prosperity Rising versus India

High but declining versus India

Low but rising versus India

Low and declining versus India

COMPETITIVENESS: UNDERLYING CONCEPTS

• Competitiveness is the productivity with which a state utilizes its

human, capital, and natural resources

• Productivity determines wages and the standard of living – Productivity

growth determines sustainable economic growth

• Productivity depends on how a state competes, not what industries it

competes in

• Innovation in products and processes is necessary to drive productivity

growth

• Only productive businesses can create wealth and jobs. States compete to

offer the most productive environment for business

• The public and private sectors play different but interrelated roles in creating

a productive economy

PUNJAB PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT

Top 33.33% of the states

33.33%-66.67% ofthe states

66.67% to 100% ofthe states

Position Trend

Prosperity

Productivity

Labour Mobilization

State of Clusters

Leading ClustersOther TransportationAgricultural ProductsMachinery Textiles

Type of Economy Transition Economies

Labour Mobilization

Population, 2011 Rank: 2• In Punjab 2,77,04,236• % of India 2.29%

Population Growth, GAGR, 2001-2011 Rank: 2• In Punjab 1.30%• In India 1.61%

Employment, 2010 Rank: 2• In Punjab 8262511• % India 2.90%

Employment growth, annual rate, 2000-2010 Rank: 2• In Punjab 1.75%• In India 2.05%

Unemployment, 2010 (Per hundred People) Rank: 1 • In Punjab 10.50• In India 9.39

Change in Unemployment rate, 2000-2010 Rank: 1• In Punjab 114.29%• In India 41.37

ClustersTotal Number of People employed in all Factory sector Rank: 2• In Punjab 5,68,211• In India 1,15,06,838• State Employment to total

India Employment (factory sector) 4.94%

Productivity

Gross State Domestic Product per labour force participant, 2011 Rank: 1• In Punjab Rs 1,64,891.• In India Rs 1,21,265• State Difference to India +35.97%

Growth in Gross State Domestic Product Rank: 2per Labour force participant, 2001-11• In Punjab 7.57%• In India 8.44%

Average Private Wage in 2008-09, Rank: 3• In Punjab Rs 53,663• In India Rs 64,741• State Difference to India -17.11%

Private Wage Growth, CAGR, 2000-2009 Rank:3• In Punjab 4.61%• In India 4.53%

ProsperityGross State Domestic Product per Capita, 2011 Rank: 1• In Punjab Rs. 63,847• In India Rs. 47,998• State Difference to India +33.02%.

Growth in Gross State Domestic Product per Capita, 2008-11 , (CAGR) Rank: 2• In Punjab 6.73%• In India 6.28%

PUNJAB COMPETITIVENESS – OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

GSD

P a

t cu

rren

t p

rice

at

fact

or

cost

in R

up

ees

Cro

reUNDERSTANDING STATE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE

67

16

2

74

67

7

79

61

1

82

24

9

90

08

9

96

66

0

10

86

53

12

12

09 1

44

30

9 16

58

04

19

23

64

18

10

40

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11

Punjab

Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

GSD

P a

t cu

rren

t p

rice

at

fact

or

cost

in R

up

ees

Cro

reCONTRIBUTION OF PUNJAB’S GSDP TO INDIAN GSDP



Ratio of Punjab's GSDP to Indian

GDP in Percentage

Terms

3.94 4.16 4.13 3.95 3.83 3.66 3.64 3.49 3.59 3.62 3.85 3.62

0

1000000

2000000

3000000

4000000

5000000

6000000


Punjab's GDP Indian GDP

WHAT DRIVES STATE PRODUCTIVITY

1. Overall business climate conducive to

growth

2. Stage of Economy (strong clusters)

3. Proper Policy

enactment and strong

rule of law

MODEL USED FOR ANALYSIS

Climate for

Innovation based

local rivalry

Clusters of Related

and Supporting

Industries

Demand

Conditions

• Local rules and incentives that encourage investment and productivity e.g.

- salaries,- incentives for capital investments, - intellectual property protection• Vigorous local competition i.e., - Openness to foreign and local competition; - Sophistication of company operations

Local availability of suppliers and supporting industriesPresence of clusters instead of isolated firms

Sophisticated and demanding local customers and needs e.g.,- Strict quality, safety, and environmental standards– Consumer protection laws – Government procurement ofadvanced technology– Early demand for products andServices.

Access to high quality business inputsi.e.,- Natural endowments,- Human resources, - Capital availability,- Physical infrastructure,- Administrative infrastructure,- Information infrastructure, - Scientific and technological infrastructure

Factor

Conditions

Source: Michael E Porter

IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY IN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT

Key Issues for States

• More power in terms of tax sharing with center

• Reduce costs of doing business

• Developing training programs which meet the specific needs of the state

industrial clusters

• Focus on infrastructure investments on the most leveraged areas for

productivity and economic growth

• Implementing policies to support small growth businesses

• Enhancing the state’s skill development and training institutions for the same

• Relentlessly improve of the public education system, the essential foundation

Nation

Neighboring states

States

City Regions

Rural Regions

GEOGRAPHIC INFLUENCES ON COMPETITIVENESS

• Influence and access federal policies and programs

• Integrate policies and infrastructure with neighbors

• Assist each city area in developing its own strategy

• Connect rural regions with urban areas

CONTRIBUTION OF AGRICULTURE SECTOR TO GSDP G

SDP

at

curr

ent

pri

ce a

t fa

cto

r co

st in

Ru

pee

s C

rore


Ratio of Agricultural

GSDP in Punjab to the total

GSDP in Punjab in Percentage

terms

37.53 35.90 34.97 32.93 32.77 32.18 31.32 31.94 32.42 33.16 34.14 32.52

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000



CONTRIBUTION OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR TO GSDP G

SDP

at

curr

ent

pri

ce a

t fa

cto

r co

st in

Ru

pee

s C

rore


Ratio of Manufacturing GSDP in Punjab to the total GSDP in

Punjab in Percentage

terms

14.93 14.44 13.09 13.87 13.58 13.54 13.49 14.33 13.51 13.12 12.72 13.07

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000



CONTRIBUTION OF SERVICE SECTOR TO GSDP G

SDP

at

curr

ent

pri

ce a

t fa

cto

r co

st in

Ru

pee

s C

rore


Ratio of Services GSDP in

Punjab to the total GSDP in

Punjab in Percentage

terms

39.71 41.10 42.26 44.72 44.22 45.17 44.84 44.14 44.61 44.10 43.66 44.67

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000



Agriculture, forestry and fishing

32%

Industry23%

Services 45%

COMPOSITION OF PUNJAB’S ECONOMY


GSD

P in

Rs.

Cro

re

Indian contribution

Punjab’s contribution

58869 41309 80863

924340

1492375

2549085

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

Agriculture, forestry and fishing Industry Services

COMPOSITION OF PUNJAB’S ECONOMY


Pu

nja

b/N

atio

nal

GSD

P s

har

e (

Pe

rce

nt)

,20

11

Change in contribution of GSDP of Punjab to total Indian GSDP, CAGR (2000-2011)

Agricuture

Banking and insurance CommunicationConstruction

Electricity, gas and water supply

Fishing

Forestry and logging

Manufacturing

Mining and quarrying

Other services

Public administration and defence

Railways

Real states, ownership of dwellings and business services

Storage

Trade, hotel and restaurant

Transport by other means

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 5 10 15 20 25

COMPOSITION OF PUNJAB’S ECONOMY IN GREATER DEPTH

STATE PRIVATE WAGE PERFORMANCE

Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh

Punjub

Uttaranchal

Haryana

Delhi

Rajasthan

Uttar Pradesh

Bihar

Nagaland

Manipur

Tripura

Meghalaya

Assam

West Bengal

Jharkhand

Orissa

Chhattisgarh Madhya PradeshGujarat

Maharashtra

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Goa

Kerala Tamil Nadu

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Wage Growth (CAGR), 2001 to 2008

Low and declining versus India Low but rising versus India

Average Wage : Rupees 64,741

Wage Growth rate 4.53%

Ave

rage

Wag

es

in R

up

ee

s ,2

00

9

Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & KashmirJharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

UttarakhandWest Bengal

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00

All

Ind

ia A

verage 5

7.2

8

Ind

ex Po

ints

All India Average of of 1,21,265 Rupees/Labour force participant

All India Average of 8.44%

GSDP /Labor force participant growth rate(CAGR)

GSD

P a

t C

urr

en

t P

rice

s p

er

lab

ou

r fo

rce

par

tici

pan

t, 2

01

1

High but declining versus India Highly productive and Productivity rising versus India

Low but rising versus India Low and declining versus India


LONG TERM JOB GROWTH

Jammu & KashmirHimachal Pradesh

PunjabHaryana

Uttar Pradesh

Rajasthan

Delhi

Uttarakhand

Bihar

Orissa

West Bengal

Assam

MeghalayaTripura Mizoram ManipurNagaland Arunachal Pradesh

Sikkim

Jharkhand

Gujarat

Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

Chhattisgarh

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala

Tamil Nadu

0

10000000

20000000

30000000

40000000

50000000

60000000

70000000

80000000

90000000

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Job growth rate CAGR, 2001-2010

Nu

mb

er

of

Job

s, 2

01

1

Losing Jobs Gaining Jobs

All India average of 1,62,99,464 Jobs /State


Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis,

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu

jharkhand

Karnataka

kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Delhi

OrissaPunjab

Rajasthan

SikkimTamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15

Change in Employment rate 1999-2010

Unemployment rate All India Average of 9.39%

All

Ind

ia A

verage 5

7.2

8

Ind

ex Po

int

s

All India Average of -2.12%

Unemployment Rising

Below average Unemployment

Above Average UnemploymentUn

em

plo

yme

nt

rate

20

10

LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

NEAR TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

Andhra PradeshArunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal PradeshJammu

jharkhand

Karnataka

kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram Nagaland

Delhi

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

SikkimTamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Change in Employment rate 2008 to 2010


All

Ind

ia

Ave

rage

5

7.2

8

Ind

ex

Poin

tsAll India Average of -6.55%

Un

em

plo

yme

nt

rate

20

10

Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

GROSS AREA SOWN VERSUS IRRIGATED AREA

Jammu & KashmirHimachal Pradesh

Punjab

Haryana

Uttar PradeshRajasthan

Delhi

Uttarakhand

BiharOrissa

West Bengal

Assam

MeghalayaTripura

Mizoram

Nagaland

Arunachal Pradesh

Sikkim

Jharkhand

Gujarat

Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

Chhattisgarh

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala

Tamil Nadu

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1 10 100 1000 10000 100000

Log of Irrigated Area in ‘000 hectares

Log

of

are

a so

wn

in ‘0

00

he

ctar

es

All India Average 67,41,000 hectares A

ll In

dia

All India Average 30,03,000 hectares

Source: MOA, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

HEALTHCARE

Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh

Punjab

Haryana


Delhi

Uttarakhand

BiharOrissa

West Bengal

Assam

MeghalayaTripuraMizoram

Manipur

Nagaland

Arunachal Pradesh

SikkimJharkhand

Gujarat

Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

ChhattisgarhAndhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala

Tamil Nadu

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f To

tal g

ove

rnm

en

t Ex

pe

nd

itu

re o

n M

ed

ical

, He

alth

an

d S

anit

atio

n

Total Government Expenditure on Medical, Health and Sanitation in Crores

All India Average 4.02%

All

Ind

iaAll India Average 1633

Crores


PERCENTAGE OF VILLAGES ELECTRIFIED

100

56.8

80.8

61.3

96.9100.0100.099.7100.098.2 98.2

31.1

99.9100.096.4

88.385.8

59.3

80.6

64.4 62.6

100.0

69.2

94.4

100.0

57.2

88.3

96.9 97.3

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

All India Average of 84.96 %


TELEDENSITY

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal PradeshChhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 429.3x + 12630R² = 0.388

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250

Teledensity

GSD

P p

er

Cap

ita

Source: Ministry of telecom, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

DEBT TO GDP RATIO

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Andhra

Arunachal

Assam

Bihar

Chattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttaranchal

West Bengal

30.1

115.9

28

39.7

15.2

13.8

35.5

32.1

19

55.7

70.1

33.6

24.3

34.3

34.4

25.1

77.4

37.3

109.1

59.4

30.6

35.2

41.1

80.6

25.5

42.2

43.5

41.1

42.8

Prescribed limit according to WTO for developing

economies

Prescribed limit according to the growth and stability Pact of EU


RURAL POPULATION VERSUS RURAL POPULATION GROWTH RATES

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

GujaratHaryanaHimachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

OrissaPunjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


-10.000

-8.000

-6.000

-4.000

-2.000

0.000

2.000

4.000

10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000

Population in Rural areas as per census (provisional Data) in Thousands

Thousands

Gro

wth

rat

e (

CA

GR

20

01

-20

11

)

Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

URBAN POPULATION VERSUS URBAN POPULATION GROWTH RATES


Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & KashmirJharkhand Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya PradeshMaharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa PunjabRajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

Population in Urban areas as per census (provisional Data) in ThousandsThousands

Gro

wth

rat

e (

CA

GR

20

01

-20

11

)


RURAL AND URBAN POPULATION IN INDIA

15

1,7

26

56

1,9

77

31

3,4

46

90

6,3

09

57

3,7

41

82

2,1

32

59

5,0

36

96

0,9

81

68

8,7

04

3,0

91

,16

9

3,4

14

,10

6

16

,33

3,9

16

8,8

21

,58

8

5,9

36

,53

8

10

,38

7,4

36

4,3

88

,75

6

7,9

29

,29

2

15

,93

2,1

71

6,9

96

,12

4

25

,71

2,8

11

23

,57

8,1

75

17

,08

0,7

76 3

4,9

49

,72

9

20

,05

9,6

66

28

,35

3,7

45

29

,13

4,0

60

11

,72

9,6

09

50

,82

7,5

31

44

,47

0,4

55

45

5,9

62

52

90

37

10

69

16

5

55

14

14

14

06

86

1

18

99

62

4

23

68

97

1

2,7

10

,05

1

61

67

80

5

7,0

25

,58

3

91

34

82

0

41

93

19

16

53

14

93

19

60

36

58

17

,31

6,8

00

26

78

05

16

25

,03

6,9

46

17

45

55

06

34

,95

1,2

34

34

67

08

17

37

55

25

29 51

,54

0,2

36

37

,18

9,2

29 52

53

78

99

56

31

17

88

62

,21

3,6

76

92

07

50

28

61

54

54

41

15

5,1

11

,02

2

0

20,000,000

40,000,000

60,000,000

80,000,000

100,000,000

120,000,000

140,000,000

160,000,000

Urban Population in 2011 Rural Population in 2011


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE IN PUNJABP

op

ula

tio

n in

Nu

mb

ers


22

97

00

0

22

82

00

0

23

33

00

0 26

00

00

0

27

65

00

0

25

97

00

0

22

88

00

0

19

79

00

0

17

69

00

0

16

15

00

0

13

76

00

0

10

86

00

0

80

30

00

59

60

00

50

20

00

40

20

00

38

90

00

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

0-4 years

5-9 years

10-14 years

15-19 years

20-24 years

25-29 years

30-34 years

35-39 years

40-44 years

45-49 years

50-54 years

55-59 year

60-64 years

65-69 years

70-74 years

75-79 years

80+ years

RURAL URBAN AND TOTAL POPULATION

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal PradeshAssam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh


Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Urb

an P

op

ula

tio

n a

s a

pe

rce

nta

ge o

f to

tal P

op

ula

tio

n


All

Ind

ia



Rural Population as a percentage of total Population

SEX RATIO VERSUS SEX RATIO GROWTH RATES

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerela

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

All India Average 0.169% CAGR

All

Ind

ia

All India Average 940 females/1000 males

CA

GR

gro

wth

rat

e 2

00

1-1

1

Sex ratio


LITERACY RATES VERSUS GDP

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


y = 1576.x - 73239R² = 0.254

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

GSD

P p

er

cap

ita

at

curr

en

t p

rice

s 2

01

1

Literacy rate 2011

Source: RBI , Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

REVENUE EXPENDITURE VERSUS REVENUE RECEIPTSR

eve

nu

e E

xpe

nd

itu

re in

Rs.

Cro

res

Revenue Receipts in Rs. Crores

Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh

Punjab

Haryana

Uttar Pradesh

Rajasthan

DelhiUttarakhand

Bihar

Orissa

West Bengal

Assam

MeghalayaTripuraMizoram

ManipurNagaland

Arunachal PradeshSikkim

Jharkhand

Gujarat

Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

Chhattisgarh

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala

Tamil Nadu

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000

All

Ind

ia

All India Average 34757 Rs. Crores

All India Average 34190 Rs. Crores

Source: RBI , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

LITERACY RATES VERSUS POPULATION

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerela

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya MizoramNagaland

Delhi

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

0

50000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Literacy rates in Percentage terms

All India Average 67232968 People/state

All

Ind

ia

All India Average Literacy level of

77.12%

Source: Census 2011 , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh

Punjab

Haryana

Uttar Pradesh

Rajasthan

DelhiUttarakhand

Bihar

Orissa

West Bengal

Assam

Meghalaya

Tripura

Mizoram

Manipur

Nagaland

Arunachal Pradesh

Sikkim

Jharkhand

Gujarat

Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

Chhattisgarh

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala

Tamil Nadu

-5

0

5

10

15

20

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000

Outstanding commercial scheduled bank credit to Agriculture in Rs. Crores

All India Average of 9.30 % CAGR growth rate

All

Ind

ia

All India Average of 12,157 Crores/state

CA

GR

gro

wth

rat

e in

Agr

icu

ltu

re 2

00

5-1

0GROWTH RATE IN AGRICULTURE VERSUS BANK CREDIT TO AGRICULTURE

Source: MOA , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

PERCENTAGE OF FACTORIES IN OPERATION VERSUS TOTAL NUMBER OF FACTORIES

Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh

PunjabHaryana


Delhi

Uttarakhand

Bihar

Orissa

West Bengal

Assam

Meghalaya

TripuraManipur

Nagaland

Jharkhand

Gujarat

Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

Chhattisgarh

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala

Tamil Nadu

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f fa

cto

rie

s n

ot

in o

pe

rati

on

Total number of factories

All India Average of 4.1% factories not in operation/state average

All

Ind

ia

All India Average of 6198 Factories/state

Source: ASI , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

SLUM POPULATION GROWTH RATE (2001-2011)

Andhra

Arunachal

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalya

Mizoram

Nagaland

OrissaPunjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttaranchal

West Bengal

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00

Po

pu

lati

on

De

cad

al G

row

th R

ate

Percentage Change in the Slum Population

India’s decadal population growth rate is 17%.

Average change in slum population is 26%.

Source: MOUA, Data as of 2010

Andhra Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Meghalya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Tamil Nadu

Uttar Pradesh

Uttaranchal

West Bengal

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

SPM

Lev

el (

Re

sid

en

tial

)

SPM Level (Industrial Area)

SPM Level above 140 is considered dangerous for residential areas

SPM Level above 400 is considered dangerous for industrial areas

SPM is Suspended Particulate matter. The above mentioned limits are are prescribed by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India.

POLLUTION

Source: CPCB , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

AIR POLLUTION

Andhra

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Meghalya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Tamil Nadu

Uttar Pradesh

Uttaranchal

West Bengal

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

SPM

Lev

el (

Re

sid

en

tial

)

SPM Level (Industrial Area)

SPM Level above 140 is considered dangerous for residential areas

SPM Level above 400 is considered dangerous for industrial areas

SPM is Suspended Particulate matter. The above mentioned limits are are prescribed by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India.

CAPITAL OUTLAY BY MAJOR SECTORS

Social service46%

Economic service52%

General economic services2%

Punjab

MAJOR CITIES OF PUNJAB

Major Cities

MAJOR CENTRES OF INDUSTRY IN PUNJAB

Textile and apparel, Auto and auto parts, Leather, bicycle, Rubber and sports goods

Textile and apparel, Rubber and paper, Machinery and Chemicals

Steel rolling and rerolling, Machinery, Auto parts, IT, Electronics and Pharmaceuticals Industry

Textile and Apparel, Auto parts, Machinery

POPULATION PERCENTAGES IN DISTRICTS OF PUNJAB

8.3

3.0

7.9

5.7

2.2

2.212.6

3.6

7.3

3.3

2.2

5.0 2.8

6.8

9.0

4.0

2.5

6.0

Barnala2.2

3.6

Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar

FACTOR CONDITIONSG

SDP

in R

s. C

rore

Factor Conditions Score

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


y = 2567.x - 97812R² = 0.143

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68

Source: MOSPI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - FINANCIAL CONDITIONSG

SDP

in R

s. C

rore

Financial Conditions Score

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


y = 5200.x - 24915R² = 0.750

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

50 55 60 65 70 75


SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - PHYSICAL CONDITIONS R

oa

d le

ng

th p

er

on

e la

kh

of

Po

pu

lati

on

Physical Conditions Score

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala


Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

RajasthanSikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 35.81x - 1554.R² = 0.254

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

Source: MORTH, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - COMMUNICATION CONDITIONSTe

led

en

sit

y

Communication Conditions Score

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Delhi

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

GoaGujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya Mizoram

NagalandOrissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

TripuraUttar Pradesh


y = 0.878x + 32.19R² = 0.115

0

50

100

150

200

250

45 55 65 75 85 95 105

Source: Ministry of Telecom , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS – ADMINSTRATIONTo

tal N

um

be

r o

f G

ove

rnm

en

t H

os

pit

als

Administration Conditions Score

Andhra Pradesh


Delhi

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

HaryanaHimachal PradeshJammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 28.91x - 1185.R² = 0.148

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Source: CBHI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - HUMAN CONDITIONSP

op

ula

tio

n in

th

e a

ge g

rou

p 1

5-6

4 y

ear

s

Human Conditions Score

Andhra Pradesh

Himachal Pradesh

Meghalaya

Nagaland

Uttar PradeshGujarat

Arunachal Pradesh

Bihar

Kerala

AssamWest Bengal

Uttarakhand

Jharkhand

Goa

Tripura

Delhi

Punjab ManipurMadhya Pradesh

Orissa

Rajasthan

Jammu & Kashmir

Tamil Nadu

Mizoram

Haryana

Maharashtra

Sikkim

Karnataka

Chhattisgarh

y = 2E+06x - 8E+07R² = 0.429

-2000000

0

20000000

40000000

60000000

80000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90

Source: Report on Population , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

SUB PILLAR OF FACTOR CONDITIONS- INNOVATION RATING


Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

DelhiGoa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh


Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengaly = 0.017x + 75.91

R² = 0.000

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

Lit

era

cy r

ate

Innovation Score


DEMAND CONDITIONS

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 1048.x - 4544.R² = 0.211

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Lit

era

cy r

ate

Demand Conditions


SUB PILLAR OF DEMAND CONDITIONS- DEMOGRAPHY

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 1048.x - 4544.R² = 0.211

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Pe

r c

ap

ita

GS

DP

at

sta

te le

ve

l

Demography


SUB PILLAR OF DEMAND CONDITIONS- INCOME AND CONSUMPTION

Income Distribution

Tota

l nu

mb

er

of

ho

use

ho

lds

Andhra

Arunachal

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

HimachalJ&K

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur MeghalayaMizoramNagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 26229x - 5E+06R² = 0.143

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

20 30 40 50 60 70 80


SUPPORTING CONDITIONS

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


y = 2607.x - 10984R² = 0.654

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

50 55 60 65 70 75 80

GSD

P/ C

apit

a

Supporting Conditions


SUB PILLAR OF SUPPORTING CONDITIONS- DIVERSITY OF FIRMS

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam BiharChhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal PradeshJammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya MizoramNagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 402.4x - 18291R² = 0.299

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

Tota

l nu

mb

er

of

fact

ori

es

Diversity of Firms Index

Source: ASI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

SUB PILLAR OF SUPPORTING CONDITIONS - BUSINESS INCENTIVES

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal PradeshAssamDelhiBihar

Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal PradeshJammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

KeralaMadhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

MizoramNagaland

Orissa

PunjabRajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 5370x - 22486R² = 0.046

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Ou

tsta

nd

ing

Sch

ed

ule

d c

om

me

rcia

l ban

k cr

ed

it

Business Incentives

Source : RBI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

STRATEGIC CONTEXTG

SDP

pe

r ca

pit

a

Strategic context

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

45 50 55 60 65 70 75


SUB PILLARS OF STRATEGIC CONTEXT – SUPPLIER SOPHISTICATION

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

DelhiBihar Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana


Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

RajasthanSikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 20093x - 80534R² = 0.206

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

Tota

l Nu

mb

er

of

Fact

ory

Wo

rke

rs

Supplier sophistication

Source: ASI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

SUB PILLAR OF STRATEGIC CONTEXT- INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT

Institutional Support Index

Edu

cati

on

al In

stit

uti

on

s –

Un

ive

rsit

ies

pe

r cr

ore

of

po

pu

lati

on

Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam Delhi

Bihar

ChhattisgarhGoa

Gujarat Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa PunjabRajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 0.980x - 49.26R² = 0.650

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85

Source: UGC, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

PROSPERITY AND COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


y = 2486.x - 10552R² = 0.517

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

45 50 55 60 65 70

Pe

r ca

pit

a St

ate

Do

me

stic

pro

du

ct a

t co

nst

ant

pri

ce 2

01

1

Microeconomic Competitiveness Scores

POLICE OFFICIALS VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya

MizoramNagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengaly = 2830x - 11635

R² = 0.122

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65

Nu

mb

er

of

Po

lice

Off

icia

ls


PORT INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Goa

Gujarat

Kerala

Maharashtra

Orissa

Tamil Nadu

West Bengal

y = 0.225x + 2.814R² = 0.005

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

50 55 60 65 70 75 80

Nu

mb

er

of

Po

rts

Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

NATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal PradeshJammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 65.13x - 1354.R² = 0.035

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

45 50 55 60 65 70

Len

gth

of

Tota

l Nat

ion

al H

igh

way

s, In

Km


AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

BiharChhattisgarh DelhiGoa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 0.116x - 4.225R² = 0.098

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

45 50 55 60 65

Nu

mb

ers

of

Do

me

stic

Air

po

rts


TELEDENSITY VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

GujaratHaryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and KashmirJharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 4.650x - 210.8R² = 0.340

0

50

100

150

200

45 50 55 60 65 70

Tele

de

nsi

ty ,

Ph

on

es

pe

r 1

00

pe

op

le in

th

e p

op

ula

tio

n


LITERACY RATES VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS



Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

DelhiGoa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 0.237x + 63.62R² = 0.023

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

45 50 55 60 65

Lite

racy

Rat

es


EDUCATION VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal PradeshJammu and KashmirJharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur MeghalayaMizoramNagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal y = 89218x - 3E+06R² = 0.014

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

45 50 55 60 65

Stu

de

nts

en

rolle

d in

hig

he

r se

con

dar

y cl

asse

sM

illio

ns


RURAL TO URBAN LITERACY RATIO VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

AssamBiharChhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 0.305x + 67.33R² = 0.056

70.00

75.00

80.00

85.00

90.00

95.00

100.00

45 50 55 60 65 70

Rat

io o

f U

rban

to

ru

ral l

ite

racy

rat

es

in p

erc

en

tage

te

rms


GENDER DISPARITY (LITERACY) VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

DelhiGoa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

MaharashtraManipur

MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 0.007x + 81.97R² = 3E-05

60.00

65.00

70.00

75.00

80.00

85.00

90.00

95.00

100.00

45 50 55 60 65 70

Rat

io o

f Fe

mal

e L

ite

racy

Rat

e t

o m

ale

Lit

era

cy r

ate

s


60746

60092

61318

63479

62281

54078

46050

40596

36773

33218

28157

22391

16693

11991

8910

6075

4469

54133

53394

57259

58248

55757

47877

42855

40164

36691

31993

26038

20447

15712

12406

10034

7017

5163

80000 60000 40000 20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000

�0-4

�5-9

�10-14

�15-19

�20-24

�25-29

�30-34

�35-39

�40-44

�45-49

�50-54

�55-59

�60-64

�65-69

�70-74

�75-79

�80+

Population of males / females in Thousands in 2011

Age Pyramid for India in 2011

Males

Female

DEMOGRAPHICS OF INDIA 2011

Source: Census of India, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

55328

58396

59500

59529

59176

60113

61859

60313

51965

43702

37704

32968

28268

22185

15820

9937

8412

49256

51790

52734

52739

52410

55998

56739

54219

46466

41361

38267

34124

28651

21982

15819

10644

11465

80000 60000 40000 20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000

�0-4

�5-9

�10-14

�15-19

�20-24

�25-29

�30-34

�35-39

�40-44

�45-49

�50-54

�55-59

�60-64

�65-69

�70-74

�75-79

�80+

Projected Population of males / females in Thousands

Age Pyramid for India in 2026

Male

Female

DEMOGRAPHICS OF INDIA 2026


45.05

51.97

49.71

57.45

39.96

48.40

51.12

46.91

50.27

55.35

45.97

45.23

60.18

48.85

44.57

48.47

46.62

60.51

43.07

66.11

56.39

44.58

42.49

45.14

47.67

48.40

34.81

43.16

41.24

42.87

43.11

47.13

43.46

45.96

48.37

42.72

42.23

43.43

41.77

46.67

43.78

55.02

47.88

42.35

80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0

Andhra Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chattisgarh

Delhi

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

NE States Excluding Assam

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Tamil Nadu

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

Dependence Ratios 2011 Dependence ratio 2026

Dependence ratio 2011 Dependence ratio 2026

OVERALL DEPENDENCE RATIO OF STATES


GOVERNMENT HOSPITALS VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh


Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

HaryanaHimachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka


Maharashtra

Manipur MeghalayaMizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 11.66x - 253.3R² = 0.016

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

45 50 55 60 65

Nu

mb

er

of

go

vern

me

nt

Ho

isp

ital

s


REGISTERED DOCTORS VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka


Maharashtra

Manipur Meghalaya

MizoramNagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 158.8x - 5888.R² = 0.114

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

45 50 55 60 65 70

Tota

l nu

mb

er

of

re

gist

ere

d A

llop

ath

ic d

oct

ors


PER CAPITA REVENUUE EXPENDITURE ON MEDICAL, HEALTH AND EXPENDITURE AND COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala


Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil NaduTripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 6.696x + 281.1R² = 0.004

0.00

500.00

1000.00

1500.00

2000.00

2500.00

45 50 55 60 65 70

Pe

r ca

pit

a re

ven

ue

exp

en

itu

re o

n m

ed

ical

, he

alth

an

d

san

itat

ion


HOUSEHOLDS AND COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana


Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya Mizoram

Nagaland

Delhi

Odisha

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 37114x - 1E+07R² = 0.045

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00

Nu

mb

er

of

Ho

use

ho

lds

in M

illio

ns


AGRICULTURAL GSDP PER CAPITA AND COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh


Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

GoaGujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

RajasthanSikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar PradeshUttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 199.8x - 2794.R² = 0.060

0.00

5000.00

10000.00

15000.00

20000.00

25000.00

45 50 55 60 65

Agr

icu

ltu

ral

GSD

P p

er

cap

ita

in R

up

ee

s /A

nn

um


PER CAPITA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION AND COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana


Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala


Manipur

Meghalaya

MizoramNagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 1.047x - 48.11R² = 0.212

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

45 50 55 60 65

Pe

r ca

ipit

a co

nsu

mp

tio

n o

f N

itro

gen

ou

s fe

rtili

zers

in K

g p

er

ann

um


MANUFACTURING AND COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

ChhattisgarhDelhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

JharkhandKarnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

ManipurMeghalaya

MizoramNagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

y = 966.5x - 47032R² = 0.295

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

45 50 55 60 65

Man

ufa

ctu

rin

g G

SDP

pe

r ca

pit

a in

Ru

pe

es

/An

nu

m


SERVICES AND COMPETITIVENESS


Andhra Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Goa

Gujarat

Haryana

Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Kerala

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Orissa

Punjab

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh


y = 2177.x - 97702R² = 0.463

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

45 50 55 60 65 70

Serv

ice

s G

SDP

pe

r ca

pit

a in

Ru

pe

es

/An

nu

m


16.85

0.21 4.94

13.98

4.15 0.289.64

3.53 1.24 1.55 4.86

10.236.60

10.92

19.06

0.40 0.42 0.16 0.337.87

4.27

9.340.10

14.17

0.66

25.76

1.59

15.72

21.02

0.266.37

18.94

5.62 0.32

12.18

4.72 1.48 2.026.18

13.18

7.72

14.97

23.83

0.51 0.54 0.22 0.40

9.66

5.41

12.58

0.13

18.49

0.84

32.92

2.00

20.07

Households in India (in Millions) 2001 and 2011

67.254.7

24.9 10.3

53.1

93.680.4 82.9

94.880.7

24.3

78.670.2 70.0

77.560.0

42.7

69.6 63.6

26.9

91.9

54.7

77.8 78.2

41.831.9

60.3

37.5

92.2

65.7

37.1

16.4

75.3

96.990.4 90.5

96.8

85.1

45.8

90.6 94.467.1

83.9

68.4

60.9

84.2 81.6

43

96.6

67

92.5 93.4

68.4

36.8

87

54.5

Percentage of Households in India 2001 and 2011 having electricity

Percentage of Households having electricity in India 2001 Percentage of Households having electricity in India 2011

HOUSEHOLDS IN INDIA

Source: Census of India,2011 Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

ACCESS TO WATER

63.9

89.5

51

68.2 68.8

40.6

27.3

4.4

85.3

65.5

47.2

38.6

58.7

33.2

39.3

10.5

25.4

12.9 13.8

20.723.4

69 67.969.9

66.1

85.4

29.3

79.8

6.5

2.9

0.5

1.13

10.8

4

4.3

0.6

5.7

25.7

7.5

4.7

27.4

25.4

18.9

636.5

19.511.4

20

7.114.4

6.49

11.1

62

5.1

11.4

3.6

24.7

2212

25.3 64.9

86.6

0

10.72.2

6.5

0.8

18.1

2.8

50.250.1

43.8

41.5

58.4

47.1

11.6

9.9

13.7

5.5

0.1

0.5

4.6

1.5

0.7

21.9

212.9

12.2

2.93

0

2.4

4.5

0.4

0.9

16.3

2.6

9.2

16.7

3.5

20

7.2 7.69.6

5.76.9

16

0.3 3.7 8.216.7

3.4 26.7

3.1

11.1

0.9 1.714.1

15.820.6

47.2

34.8

5.1

29.9

11.3

1.8 3.4 5.22.3 2 2.6 2.2 3.2 3.5

3.24.4 2.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pe

rce

nta

ge b

y so

urc

e o

f h

ou

seh

old

s

Tap water Well Handpump Tubewell Tank, Pond, Lake, River, Spring, Canal and any other source

Source: Census of India,2011 Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

Gujarat 25%

Maharashtra 21%

Tamil Nadu 9%

Karnataka 5%

Andhra Pradesh 5%

Haryana 3%

Uttar Pradesh 3%

West Bengal 3%

Odisha 3%

Kerala 3%

Delhi 2%

Rajasthan 2%

Punjab 2%

Madhya Pradesh

1% Goa 1%

Rest of the states11%

Share of Exports from various states in 2010-11

4027244667

18540

12296 9897 4792 7571 55833351 4753

38775

43356

16085

90938559

56795524

41973230

5843

6169453788

23378

1360312567

85848208

7111 69906547

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

Exp

ort

s in

Mill

ion

s o

f D

olla

rs

Value of Exports from various states

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS

Source: Economic Survey of India 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

COUNTRY EQUIVALENTS

Source: EIU 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

BAHA

MASCUBA

Punjab

Uttar Pradesh

Haryana

Madhya Pradesh

Bihar

Rajasthan

Maharashtra

Gujarat

Jammu and Kashmir

Uttarakhand

Andhra Pradesh

Tamil Nadu

Karnataka

Odisha

West Bengal

Kerala

Chhattisgarh

Jharkhand

Himachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Manipur

Mizoram

Meghalaya

Nagaland

Sikkim

Delhi

Goa

ChinaPakistan

Arabian SeaBay of Bengal

Indian OceanSri Lanka

Nepal

Tripura

24.6

21.4

9.3

5.4

5.0

3.4

3.3

2.8

2.8

2.6

2.4

2.1

1.6

1.2

0.7

EXPORTS FROM THE TOP 15 STATES PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL


Punjab

Uttar Pradesh

Haryana

Madhya Pradesh

Bihar

Rajasthan

Maharashtra

Gujarat

Jammu and Kashmir

Uttarakhand

Andhra Pradesh

Tamil Nadu

Karnataka

Odisha

West Bengal

Kerala

Chhattisgarh

Jharkhand

Himachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Manipur

Mizoram

Meghalaya

Nagaland

SikkimDelhi

Goa

ChinaPakistan



Nepal

Tripura

3

1

35

4015

22

18

1136

4

100

5233

108

88

74

33

21

2

67

317

88

7

2

00

0

0

NUMBER OF PPP PROJECTS IN INDIA


Punjab

Uttar Pradesh

Haryana

Madhya Pradesh

Bihar

Rajasthan

Maharashtra

Gujarat

Jammu and Kashmir

Uttarakhand

Andhra Pradesh

Tamil Nadu

Karnataka

Odisha

West Bengal

Kerala

Chhattisgarh

Jharkhand

Himachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Manipur

Mizoram

Meghalaya

Nagaland

SikkimDelhi

Goa

ChinaPakistan



Nepal

Tripura

1.04

0.57

2.29

2.09

16.495.67

1.38

0.84

8.58

3.47

7.55

2.58

0.24

0.300.09

0.22

0.16

0.11

2.724.99

9.29

0.12

6.00

2.11

7.00

5.05

2.765.96

POPULATION PERCENTAGES IN STATES


Punjab

Uttar Pradesh

Haryana

Madhya Pradesh

Bihar

Rajasthan

Maharashtra

Gujarat

Jammu and Kashmir

Uttarakhand

Andhra Pradesh

Tamil Nadu

Karnataka

Odisha

West Bengal

Kerala

Chhattisgarh

Jharkhand

Himachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh

Assam

Manipur

Mizoram

Meghalaya

Nagaland

Sikkim

Delhi

Goa

ChinaPakistan



Nepal

Tripura

1788

1652

1056

945

941

933

872

821

801

713

698

669

650

615

571

553

544

534

529

494

487

474

404

396

394

378

377

320

254

All the figures are in dollars, The exchange rate taken for arriving at the figures was 1 US$ = 49 Rupees

PROSPERITY IN INDIA


STATE OF INDUSTRIES

Jammu & Kashmir

Himachal Pradesh

PunjabHaryana

Uttar Pradesh

RajasthanDelhi

Uttarakhand

BiharOrissa

West Bengal

Assam

Meghalaya

Tripura

Mizoram

Manipur

NagalandArunachal Pradesh

Sikkim

Jharkhand

Gujarat Maharashtra

Goa

Madhya Pradesh

Chhattisgarh

Andhra Pradesh

KarnatakaKerala

Tamil Nadu

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

10000000

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000

Contribution in Rs Crores

All India Average of 18,54,826 people employed/ state

All

Ind

ia

All India Average 23816.62 Crores

Source: MSME , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

CONTRIBUTION PER PERSON IN INDUSTRIES

3.79 3.88

3.563.34

1.41

1.77

0.30

2.96

0.36

0.760.51 0.55

0.43 0.35

1.37

0.14

1.98

0.62

0.20

0.62

1.26

1.72

5.75

2.27

0.76

0.25

1.20

0.81

2.76

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n in

Lak

hs

of

Ru

pe

es

Average Contribution of

1.57 Lakhs/Person

Source: MSME 4th round , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

PER UNIT EMPLOYMENT VERSUS PER UNIT GROSS OUTPUT

Source: MSME 4th round, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

Manufacturing

Services

Per unit employment (Person)

Per unit Gross Output (in Lakhs of Rupees)

Manufacturing Services

Per unit employment (Person) 4.96 1.48

Per unit Gross Output (in Lakhs of Rupees) 21.00 4.97

Per unit revenues/ per unit employment 4.23 3.36

MARKET VALUE VERSUS ORIGINAL VALUE OF PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Source: MSME fourth round, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

Manufacturing Services

Market value of Fixed Investments in Crores of Rupees 16119.22 467.44

Original value of Plant and Machinery/ Equipment in Crores of Rupees 3177.18 467.44

No of times valued by the market 5.07 1.00

0.00

2000.00

4000.00

6000.00

8000.00

10000.00

12000.00

14000.00

16000.00

18000.00

Manufacturing

Services

Market value of Fixed Investments in Crores of Rupees

Original value of Plant and Machinery/ Equipment in Crores of Rupees

Source: ASI 2008-09, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

Top 7 types of Industries in the state

7-14 types of Industries in the state


21-28 types of Industries in state

STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT: TOTAL NUMBER OF FACTORIES

Mining

TextilesApparels and related industries

Publishing and

Printing

Glass and related

industries

Footwear

Lighting Electric

equipment

Minerals

Tobacco

Automotive

Oil and Gas

Medical equipment

Furniture

Other transportat

ion

Leather industries

Wood and Forest

Products

Rubber and Plastic

Industries

Television and allied electronic industries

Processed food

Chemicals

Pulp and Paper

Agricultural Products

Agricultural services

Other Service

Industries

Machinery and

Equipment

Metals

Domestic and electric Industries

Production

STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT: TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES




21-28 types of Industries in state


Mining

TextilesApparels and related industries

Publishing and

Printing

Glass and related

industries

Footwear

Lighting Electric

equipment

Minerals

Tobacco

Automotive

Oil and Gas

Medical equipment

Furniture

Other transportat

ion

Leather industries

Wood and Forest

Products

Rubber and Plastic

Industries


Processed food

Chemicals

Pulp and Paper



Other Service

Industries

Machinery and

Equipment

Metals


Production

STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT: TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE


0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000

Machinery and equipment

Textiles

other transportation

Metals

Food Processing

Automotive

Pulp and Paper

other service industries

Agriculture services

Lighting and electric equipment

Printing and Publishing

Medical

Glass Industries

Mining

80852

67911

57178

46670

41810

36432

24728

19174

14582

13691

13264

11363

9761

6677

6429

6174

5647

4053

2147

1871

1747

1737

936

332

311

220

0

0

CREATING A STATE ECONOMIC STRATEGY

State Value Proposition

Achieving and Maintaining parity with peers

Developing Unique Strengths

What are the main strengths, positive attributes, location advantage etc of the particular state in question.

• How can the state leverage on its unique capabilities and create new ones?

• Which businesses/ clusters can be made stronger?

• What are the key weaknesses which need to be taken care of while forming maintaining parity with peers?

State economic strategy requires setting clear priorities and measuring against predefined criteria.

COMPETITION AMONG STATES

Tactical (Zero Sum Competition)

Strategic (Positive Sum Competition)

• Focus on FDI investments

• Compete in every domain

• Offer tax benefits across the

spectrum

• Provide subsidies to lower / offset

business costs

• Every city and sub-region for itself

• Government is responsible for development of cluster.

• Focus on domestic and existing

companies

• Compete in specialized cluster domains

• Government incentives and support for

training, infrastructure, and institutions

• Improve the efficiency of doing

business

• Economies of scale to help benefit from

multiple geographies

• Government and the private sector

collaborate to build cluster strength


HOW SHOULD STATES COMPETE WITH EACH OTHER

Old Model New Model

Competitiveness is the result of both top-down and bottom-up processes in which many companies and institutions take responsibility

• Government drives economic development through policy decisions and incentives

• Economic development is a collaborative process involving government at multiple levels, companies, teaching and research institutions, and private sector organizations


COMPETITION AMONG STATES

• The purpose of a sound economic policy is to increase the overall prosperity in

the state and for that the states should focus on increasing their competitiveness.

• Improvements and productivity and technological advancement are the guiding

principles in this regard.

• Competitiveness requires a fundamental rethinking of usage of your existing

resources.

• For government has to fundamentally rethink its role, it should try to foster a spirit

of entrepreneurship in the private sector.

• The criteria for judging the merits and demerits of an economic policy should be

by outcomes and not political philosophy.

• The prosperity of India will depend largely on the states and not just the (Center)

Delhi.

INTERPRETATION CHARTS

Top 33.33% of the states

33.33%-66.67% ofthe states

66.67% to 100% ofthe states

• The snapshot chart summarizes the relative performance of a state on levels and trends in 5 key

measures. The circles in the chart show the measurement of the chart legend.

• Prosperity: State GDP per capita and 10 year trend.

• Productivity: Average Private wage and 10 year trend.

• Labour Mobilization: Total labour force as a share of civilian population and 10 year trend.

• Clusters: Total number of people employed in the cluster and total number of enterprises in the cluster.

• Type of Economy: Factor Driven economies, Changeover economies, Investment driven

economies, Transition economies, Innovation driven economies and city state economies.

Position Trend

Prosperity

Productivity

Labour Mobilization

State of Clusters

Leading ClustersOther TransportationAgricultural ProductsMachinery Textiles

Type of Economy Transition Economies





The Chart represents the numberof factories in various types ofIndustries in state.

The position of the various typesof factories shows relativeproximity in terms of type ofIndustry. Thus, Chemical is placednext to Oil and gas, etc.

The colour coding is done toshow the importance of factorysector in terms of number ofenterprises in the state. Thusyellow shows the maximumnumber of industries in the state.

STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT : FACTORIES

Mining

TextilesApparels

and related industries

Publishing and

Printing

Glass and related

industries

Footwear

Lighting Electric

equipment

Minerals

Tobacco

Automotive

Oil and Gas

Medical equipment

Furniture

Other transportat

ion

Leather industries

Wood and Forest

Products

Rubber and Plastic

Industries


Processed food

Chemicals

Pulp and Paper



Other Service

Industries

Machinery and

Equipment

Metals


Production

Top 7 ranked types of Factories in the state

7-14 ranked types of Factories in the state



The Chart represents the number ofEmployees in various types ofIndustries in state.

The position of the various types ofindustries shows relative proximityin terms of type of Industry.Thus, Chemical is placed next to Oiland gas. etc.

The colour coding is done to showthe importance of Industries interms of number of employees inthe state. Thus yellow shows thebracket of maximum number ofemployees in the state.

STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT : EMPLOYEES

Mining

TextilesApparels

and related industries

Publishing and

Printing

Glass and related

industries

Footwear

Lighting Electric

equipment

Minerals

Tobacco

Automotive

Oil and Gas

Medical equipment

Furniture

Other transportat

ion

Leather industries

Wood and Forest

Products

Rubber and Plastic

Industries


Processed food

Chemicals

Pulp and Paper



Other Service

Industries

Machinery and

Equipment

Metals


Production

• The economy has been looked at from the primary, secondary and tertiary Perspective. These sectors

are then looked in detail to find the contribution of each sub sector to the three primary sectors namely

Agriculture, Industry and Services.

• The result is a bubble chart which shows the contribution of each sub sector to the economy.

• The size of the bubble represents the size of the GSDP contribution in Rs. Crores.

Strong and Growing Position

Cluster is growing faster than Indian Average

The regions share of cluster GSDP relative to its size

COMPONENTS OF REGIONAL ECONOMIES

Pu

nja

b /

Nat

ion

al G

SDP

sh

are

(P

erc

en

t) ,2

01

1

Change in contribution of GSDP of Punjab to total Indian GSDP, CAGR (2000-2011)

Agricuture

Banking and insurance CommunicationConstruction

Electricity, gas and water supply

Fishing

Forestry and logging Manufacturing

Mining and quarrying

Other servicesPublic administration and defence

Railways

Real states, ownership of dwellings and business

services

Storage

Trade, hotel and restaurant

Transport by other means

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 5 10 15 20 25

• Clusters are geographically proximate

groups of interconnected companies and

associated institutions in a particular field.

Examples include chemical and

pharmaceutical clusters in Gujarat and

apparel and diamond cluster in Surat.

Clusters and sub clusters taken for the study

are taken at the end of this report.

• Employment by cluster gives a more

detailed profile of the activities in the state

economy that make up the Job Base. It can

be used to understand the importance of

the health of various groups of Industries on

the overall prosperity of the region.

EMPLOYMENT BY A CLUSTER

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000

Machinery and equipment

Agriculture Products

Textiles

Minerals

other transportation

Apparels and related Industries

Metals

Rubber and Plastic Industries

Food Processing

Chemical

Automotive

Domestic and electric industries

Pulp and Paper

Leather Industries

other service industries

Television and allied electronic …

Agriculture services

Production

Lighting and electric equipment

Footwear

Printing and Publishing

Wood and forest Products

Medical

Furniture

Glass Industries

Oil and Gas

Mining

Tobacco

80852

67911

57178

46670

41810

36432

24728

19174

14582

13691

13264

11363

9761

6677

6429

6174

5647

4053

2147

1871

1747

1737

936

332

311

220

0

0

• The political boundaries of a state often encompass many distinct regional economies or portions of

large regional economies. A comprehensive approach to economic development should reflect both

the distinct economies within the state as well as strong linkages to the economies in the neighboring

states. In addition to this clusters should be mapped on areas of high economic growth. This will lead

to spillover effects in the long run.

• A state's or region’s economy can be divided

into 3 components namely

1. Primary/Agriculture sector

2. Secondary/Industry sector

3. Tertiary/Service sector

In this report we focus more on Industrial sector to bring out its components in detail.

GSD

P in

Rs.

Cro

re

A BRIEF NOTE OF THE REGIONS AND OVERALL ECONOMY OF PUNJAB

58869 41309 80863

924340

1492375

2549085

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

Agriculture, forestry and fishing Industry Services

Agricultural products• Grain mill products, starches & starch products

and prepared animal foods

• Other food products• Beverages

Apparels and related industries• Knitted and crocheted fabrics and articles

• Wearing apparel; dressing and dyeing of fur• Wearing apparel, except fur apparel

Agricultural services• Agriculture, hunting, and related services activities

Automotive• Bodies (coach work) for motor

vehicles

• Parts and accessories formotor vehicles & their engines

Chemicals• Basic chemicals

Domestic and electric Industries• Domestic appliances

• Office, accounting and computing machinery

• Electrical machinery and apparatus

• Electric motors, generators and transformers• Electricity distribution and control apparatus

Footwear• Footwear

Furniture• Furniture

Glass and related industries• Glass and glass products

Leather industries• Tanning & dressing of leather; luggage, handbags

Medical equipment• Medical, precision and optical

instruments, watches & clocks

Metals• Basic Iron & Steel

• Basic precious and non-ferrous metals• Casting of metals

Lighting electric equipment• Insulated wire and cable

• Accumulators, primary cells and primary batteries

• Electric lamps and lighting equipment• Other electrical equipment

Minerals• Minerals

Machinery and equipment• Structural metal products, tanks, reservoirs

• Other fabricated metal products

• Machinery and equipment

• General purpose machinery• Special purpose machinery

Other service industries• Other Service Industries

Mining• Mining and quarrying

Processed food• Manufacture of food products and beverages

• Meat, fish, fruit vegetables, oils and fats• Dairy product

Publishing and printing• Publishing• Printing and service activities related to printing

Rubber and plastic industries• Rubber products• Plastic products

Production• Manufacturing

Pulp and Paper• Pulp and Paper Industries

Wood and forest products• Wood and of products

• Saw milling and planning of wood• Products of wood, cork, straw and plaiting materials

Textiles• Spinning, weaving and finishing of textiles

• Other textiles

Oil and gas• Coke oven products• Refined petroleum products

Tobacco• Tobacco products

Television and allied electronic industries• Electronic valves and tubes

and other electronic components

• Television and radio transmitters

and apparatus• Television and radio receivers

Other transportation• Other transport equipment

• Railway and tramway locomotives and rolling stock• Transport equipment

CLUSTERS AND SUB CLUSTERS IN THE INDIAN ECONOMY

Punjab

Documents

Transcript of Punjab