PUBLIC SERVICE OPTIMIZATION FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT ... · efficient and effective service...
Transcript of PUBLIC SERVICE OPTIMIZATION FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT ... · efficient and effective service...
PUBLIC SERVICE OPTIMIZATION
FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT
SERVICE DELIVERY: THE WAY
FORWARD FOR KENYA
By
Mrs. Mary W. Kimonye, MBS
Principal Administrative Secretary
State Department for Public service
Ministry of Public Service, Youth and Gender
1
OUTLINE
Mandate of the State Department of Public
Service
The Public Service Perspective
Definitions
Public Service Optimization
Enabler conditions for optimizations
Prevailing context
Attempts at optimization
Key issues, challenges and lessons learnt
The Way Forward
Conclusion2
MANDATE OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE
The State Department for Public Service, in the
Ministry of Public Service, Youth and Gender
Affairs was created in June 2018.
The Department is responsible for providing
strategic leadership and policy direction in public
service management.
3
MANDATE OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE
The functions of the State Department entail:
Public Sector Reforms and Transformation including
operational standards and process engineering;
Co-ordination of Huduma Centres;
Government Human Resource Information Systems
and Services;
Government Payroll Policy and Standards;
Shared Services;
Research Development and Public Service Delivery
Innovations;
Public Service Career Planning and Development; and
Counselling Policy and Services. 4
MANDATE OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE
The State Department is organized into three (3)
technical Divisions namely:
Human Resource Development,
Human Resource Management, and
Management Consultancy Services.
5
THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN PERSPECTIVE
The collective of institutions, people and
organizational frameworks and concepts put in
place by Governments to manage public
resources (complex, complicated).
The Public Service is the principal national
integrater. It has to bring multiple players with
diverse interest and resources to ensure they
perform as ‘one whole’.
6
THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN PERSPECTIVE
The centrality of the Public Service in the socio-
economic and political development of a nation
cannot be over emphasized.
Its voice is communicated through:
Policy
Legal and regulatory
Guidelines
Attitudes and behaviors of office holders
7
DEFINITIONS
Optimization:
Processes, systems and people across all functions to ensure efficiency, productivity and effectiveness.
Involves choice, prioritizing, skilling, tooling, compensating and support to ensure you maximize positive outcomes such as productivity, satisfaction, responsiveness reliability, performance while minimizing negative outcomes such as waste, costs, loss and apathy.
8
DEFINITIONS
Optimization cont’d:In the Kenyan Public Service, optimization is
complementary to institutional and organisational review, whose objective is to improve performance and productivity through
performance and productivity improvement.
The term optimization has often been erroneously equated with terms such as downsizing, layoff, retrenchment or other term that entails staff reduction.
In short, optimization entails making the Service as good as possible with as less as possible. 9
DEFINITIONSEffectiveness:
the ability to be successful in producing desired or intended results and aspirations for the Public Service. It means meeting needs of diverse groups
Efficiency:
the degree to which a task can be achieved with minimal time, effort and resources, and is an important factor in business success. (Achieving more with less).
Effective and efficient public services
delivery presupposes meeting citizens’ needs and aspirations through high performance and
productivity.
10
PUBLIC SERVICE OPTIMIZATION
Optimization in context of Public Service should
be the focus of any leadership interested in a
legacy of success.
Attempts at optimization are often hijacked,
compromised and derailed by the tipping point
phenomenon where small ideas actions,
behaviours, perceptions permeate through the
population to create a widely accepted truth.
11
PUBLIC SERVICE OPTIMIZATION
In Kenya for example, we have a generally
accepted truth called “Gava” marked by a picture of inefficiency, waste, isolation, insensitivity,
criticism, unethical behavior etc so that
whatever, Government does the default reaction
of the citizen is objection.
In general, a national believe that “nothing good
can come out of Gava!! But is this the truth of
the matter? 100%. NO!”12
ENVISIONED OPTIMIZED PUBLIC SERVICE (KENYA)
Lean, Efficient
Highly motivated and productive
Impartial in service delivery
Citizen centric(accountable/responsive)
Results focused
Value driven (professional, ethical)
Affordable and sustainable
Parity in treatment (appointment, training,
development
In a nutshell – A Fit for purpose Service13
ENABLER CONDITIONS FOR OPTIMIZATIONS
National Agenda
Clarity on what needs to be done (A national Vision that spells out key result areas and trajectory of achievements with clarity on targets
and means of achievements.
Prioritization
Among all the competing interests, what are the key priorities?
14
ENABLER CONDITIONS FOR OPTIMIZATIONS Cont’d
Focus
Unwavering “sticking” to what have been defined as priorities. No drifting!!
Rightness (Matching skills to jobs)
The right men and women in the right jobs and well engaged.
Delivery Capability
Continuous improvement in terms of skills, knowledge attitudes and systems, process design and cost containment.
15
ENABLER CONDITIONS FOR OPTIMIZATIONS Cont’d
Leadership
Transformative leaders leading from the front (agile, innovative, committed to results).
Innovation/visualization
An enabling business climate that quickly adjusts, adopts, manages unintended consequences and embraces new knowledge and technology.
16
PREVAILING CONTEXTCitizenry that is:
Increasingly becoming aware of its rights Cynical and overly critical of Government (Public
Service) Growing demand and pressure on Public Service Increased scrutiny of public officers Demanding and discerning
An environment that is:
Extremely dynamic and disruptive
Technologically mobile – (instantaneous access to information)
Highly competitive and globalized
Highly mobile resources
Rise of the millennial (selfie) workforce17
PREVAILING CONTEXT CONT’D
An Economy that: Is contracting/dwindling resources Has fiscal pressure Demand for resources outstrips supply Expenditures outstrip revenues High youth unemployment Growing population and demand for services
Increasingly digital Decreasing real wages
18
PREVAILING CONTEXT CONT’D
A public Service that:
Is ageing;
High brain drain;
Resource constrained;
Politically driven;
Complex and complicated
New constitutional pressures
High levels of individual interests
19
PREVAILING CONTEXT CONT’D
Government that is expected to:
• High levels of capital flight
• Create jobs and wealth
• Provide enabling or growth spurring policy mix
• Balance interest of competing forces
• Collect taxes and provide basic services
• Undertake development projects
20
Highly Fragmented
• Commissions
• Independent Offices
• State Corporations
• SAGAs
Unintended Consequences
- Autonomous recruitment remuneration
- Non sharability of competencies
- Non transferability of services
- Diverse allowances and benefits
- Inequality in Human Resource Management21
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
Within this context, the Public Service has undertaken historical and current steps at optimization:
I. Kenyanization policy (1964-1989)
The objective of the policy was to place Kenyans in key positions in the Public Service.
The Government’s policy aimed at employment creation, social justice and political equality, expanding the structure for delivery of public services to make them more accessible to the citizens.
22
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
Kenyanization policy (1964-1989) cont’dFresh graduates were guaranteed employment
in the Public Service.
There was little or no consideration of the implications of this continued recruitment of every new graduate into Government service in terms of its impact on the Public Service wage-bill or on the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the Service.
It is thus, not surprising that staff growth expanded rapidly between 1964 and 1980, especially in the State Owned Enterprises.
23
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
II. Civil Service Reform Programme (1993-2009)
The Civil Service Reform Programme (CSRP) was launched as one key reform strategies to improve efficiency and productivity in the Civil Service and to smaller extend in the State Corporations.
Phase I of the programme (1993-1998) focused on cost containment through staff reduction initiatives, including implementation of Voluntary Early Retirement Scheme (VERS).
24
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
II. Civil Service Reform Programme (1993-2009)
While staff reduction initiatives were able to reduce the size of the Civil Service by about 64,155 persons by the end of 1999, with hope of freeing sufficient resources for development expenditure)
Downward push on wage bill.
Government reformulated CSRP as a Medium Term Strategy (1998-2001) whose objective was comprehensive Ministerial Rationalization and Staff Rightsizing exercise in all Ministries/ Departments 25
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
CSRP (1993-2009) Cont’dMinistries and Departments were directed to
prepare Ministerial/Departmental strategic plans aligned to National Goals and Objectives as outlined in the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper and the 9th National Development Plan.
Ministries/Departments were required to undertake activities that would result in elimination of duplications and overlaps of functions by articulating their core mandates, policy priorities and strategic objectives.
26
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
CSRP (1993-2009) Cont’dOverlaps and duplications were resolved through
Ministerial Civil Service Reform Committees chaired by the respective Permanent Secretaries.
The National Steering Committee of CSRP was chaired by the Permanent Secretary to the Cabinet, who was responsible for setting the overall reform agenda and providing strategic leadership for the exercise.
Ministerial Civil Service Reform Committees were responsible for overseeing rationalization and optimization in respective ministries/departments27
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
CSRP (1993-2009) Cont’dFunctions identified as non-core and which
could neither be transferred to the relevant public service organization were dealt with through the most appropriate of five (5) strategies:
Abolition of the function together with the accompanying staff establishment,
Privatization, Commercialization, Contracting out, and Re-tooling government Ministries/Departments.
28
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
CSRP (1993-2009) Cont’dWhere there was need to reduce staff, this was
done through:
Voluntary Early Retirement Scheme, Abolition of posts that remained had vacant for a long
time, Control of unauthorized recruitment through
centralization of issuance of new personal numbers to civil servants
Freeze on recruitment into the civil service except in critical areas,
Withdrawal of guaranteed employment to pre-trainees and graduates of tertiary educational institutions, and
Strict enforcement of the mandatory retirement age.29
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
III. The CARPS Programme (2010 - Present)The objective of the Capacity Assessment and
Rationalization of the Public Service (CARPS) Programme is to ensure that Government functions are properly structured and staffed to facilitate transformation of the public service for efficient and effective service delivery at the National and County Government levels.
The CARPS Programme currently covers the National and County Governments. State Corporations, Independent Offices, Commissions, and disciplined forces will be covered at a later date. 30
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
III. The CARPS Programme (2010 - Present)
Full implementation in three phases over a medium term framework:
Phase 1: Study and Design
Phase 2: Rationalization and Redeployment
Phase 3: Re-engineering and Capacity Building
31
ATTEMPTS AT OPTIMIZATION
III. The CARPS Programme (2010 - Present)
Optimization under the Capacity Assessment and Rationalization of the Public Service (CARPS) Programme is being implemented through three steps:
Outline of key result areas and strategic objectives;
Institutional and organisational reviews in the ministries/departments and the County Governments; and,
Determination of optimal staffing levels.32
Table: Outline of key result areas and strategic objectives
33
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
1. Performance Management System and Productivity
There is need for a robust system that will ensure that the activities and outputs serve to contribute to the goals of the service.
Individual and team goals must speak to the organizational goals and ultimately to national goals. These are then integrated in a cycle
Commitment tot productivity and results
34
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
CONT’D2. Leadership buy-in. Otherwise it becomes
A box ticking process
Employee judging rather than coaching and development process
3. Independence
How independent, impartial, stable is the Public Service.
Optimization becomes unattainable in the face of interference whether political, trade union, social, cultural etc.
35
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
CONT’D4. Use of technologies
Enable mass customization of services and make them uniform
This will help customize services and make them uniformly accessible to large groups of the population e.g. e-tax returns by KRA or online applications of jobs, etc.
Need to balance between automation and human touch to guard against the feelings of isolation.
5. Engagement collaboration and integration
The Public Service going forward should focus on joint planning and greater cross functional collaboration. This will remove silos cut on time and costs and make government more affordable.
36
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
CONT’D6. Citizen engagement
Since the consumer of public service is the citizen, government should work on increased citizen engagement.
The Constitution of Kenya 2010 is categorical on citizen engagement.
7. Private sector engagement
There is no government even the best organized and intentioned that can provide all jobs needed in an economy. This responsibility often lies with the private sector. Private public partnership is the way of the future in order to maximize public value. 37
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
CONT’D8. Optimization and innovation
Optimization has a limit. Government must explore the unlimited options and these often are from innovation, putting in place shorter more efficient processes, more fit for purpose organizations, better policy frameworks (clarity, decisiveness, specificity)
9. Culture
Optimization can be achieved gradually through a culture of sustained gradual change year on year (popularly referred to as continuous improvement).
In built in the performance contracting is the concept of progressive goal/target setting.
38
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
CONT’D10. Human Resource Management
Moving from wage based remuneration to softer issues such as morale, work environment, satisfaction, employee well being and other non-monetary incentives have a bearing on performance and optimization.
A happy employee is more likely to innovate.
39
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
CONT’D11. Duplication and overlap of function due to legal provisions:
The National and County Governments have overlapping roles and mandates with regard to health, agriculture, trade and culture and heritage among other functions assigned to both levels of Governments in the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution.
12. Optimization to eliminate duplications and overlaps (encompassing institutional and organizational reviews) in this context can only be undertaken through Constitutional interpretation and amendment.
40
WAY FORWARD - KEY ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNT
CONT’D
Review of existing legal, policy and institutional framework based on the Constitution to entrench optimization as a strategy for effective and efficient public service.
41
THANK-YOU
42