Public Information Meeting Summary Meeting Dates and Locations: February 21-22, 2012, San Luis and...
-
Upload
aubree-rochester -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Public Information Meeting Summary Meeting Dates and Locations: February 21-22, 2012, San Luis and...
Public Information Meeting Summary Meeting Dates and Locations: February 21-22, 2012, San Luis and City of Yuma
Public Feedback:
1. Is there an interest in short line rail for export/import?Majority of said “Yes”. Only one “No” vote.
2. Is there an unmet need for short line rail for export/import? Majority of attendees said yes. Only one responded “not at this time”
3. Do you have an interest for rail connection to the seaports in Mexico?Majority of attendees said “yes”. One said depends upon the route.
Public Information Meeting Summary Cont.
4. If a rail line is developed to connect Yuma to Mexico:a. What portion of Yuma County should it pass through?– Do the pink line with distribution centers at… POE– Follow Area Service Highway– South of the farmland along ASH– Through POE 2 and along (parallel to Ash Hwy)– It should travel parallel to the border then join the main line via a route across
BMG Range east of Gila Mountains. The Wellton area would serve well for economic activity for trans load and other operations
Public Information Meeting Summary Cont.b. What areas of the County are areas to avoid?– Agricultural land, populated areas, new Walmart along Ave 8E area, MCAS
weapons range– Do not bisect east-west
c. Or should it not be built?– Only if logistics can be built near port of entry so some economic benefit to Yuma
County– Majority of attendees said “yes”
5. What concerns do you have about a rail connection through Yuma County?– Transport of Hazmat through Yuma County. Loss of viable agricultural land.– Disruption to community, lack of economic benefit to Yuma
6. Would you utilize rail if it were readily available– Divided reaction. Two participants indicated “Yes” and two indicated “No”
Summary POE II Trade Meeting on March 20, 2012Discussion Items:
1. Reviewed the Purpose and Need of the project2. Reviewed the types of rail service to be considered
a. Intermodal facility Container –on-Flatcar (COFC)/ Trailer-on-Flatcar (TOFC) b. Unit train facility attached to a consolidation centerc. Carload facility
– Industrial park– Bulk trans load/team tracks– Warehousing
3. Reviewed long term freight rail opportunities if a deep sea port at Punta Colonet is constructed
4. Solicited input on a crossing location5. Emailed out a questionnaire
• Currently waiting for responses
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
This technical memorandum considers:– the types of industries that are located in Yuma County and their likely usage
of rail– the current status of rail service in Yuma County– The nature of Yuma County’s trading relationships, particularly with Mexico – Provides a freight profile of Yuma County’s neighboring regions of Imperial
County, CA and Sonora, Mexico– Rail’s role in the U.S. transportation system, and how this might impact
options to improve rail service in Yuma County.
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Economic Profile:Agriculture (2007 – US Census Bureau)• Agriculture is an important component of Yuma County’s economy
– Yuma County Represents 20.4% of Arizona farm payroll• Yuma County's inbound shipments currently devoted to agriculture and fertilizer• Yuma County’s outbound shipments are currently devoted to grain • Produce accounts for 70% of the value of Yuma County’s agricultural production.
– Rail service would need to be fast enough to bring products to market before spoiling
Pct of Land
Pct of Workforce
Value Per Acre
Total Farm Payroll
Yuma County 6% 8.8% $4,558 $77,446,000Arizona 36% 1.1% $124 $380,491,000United States 41% 1.9% $323 $21,877,661,000
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile
Economic Profile - Related to agriculture:• Yuma County’s largest manufacturing industry is perishable food manufacturing.• In the other US locations, rail is used for shipping frozen and non-frozen fruits and
vegetables.• For non-frozen perishable foods, rail service would need to be fast enough to
bring products to market before spoiling.Industry EmploymentPerishable prepared food manufacturing 500-999Yarn texturizing, throwing, and twisting mills 250-499All other basic organic chemical manufacturing 250-499AC, refrigeration, and forced air heating 250-499Corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing 100-249All other plastics product manufacturing 100-249Fabricated metal product manufacturing 100-249Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing 123Wood product manufacturing 118
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Economic DevelopmentGreater Yuma Economic Development Corporation (GYEDC) leads this effort.
Target industries include:• Food processing• Military and Defense Testing• Industrial Manufacturing• Logistical and Distribution• Renewable Energy• Twin Plant/Maquila Operations• 41.7% business leads were in Manufacturing (2011 GYEDC Annual Report)• 10% of business leads were in Distribution (2011 GYEDC Annual Report)
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Food Processing Products in the US Shipped by Rail in 2010Source: US Surface Transportation Board (STB) 2020 Public Carload Waybill Sample
• 20.2 Million tons of products derived from Grains (Soybean Cake, Flour, Grits, Meal)
• 1.5 Million tons of frozen vegetables• 1 Million tons of non-frozen juice, vegetables and fruits• Rail could play a role in the Yuma Region for shipping these types of products
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile
Military and Defense Products in the US Shipped by Rail in 2010Source: US Surface Transportation Board (STB) 2020 Public Carload Waybill Sample
• 8,024 rail carloads • Large rail volumes of military hardware often relate to deployments• It is unlikely that Yuma County will generate large volumes of rail freight • Smaller rail volumes in military testing operations could generate small rail
shipments• The extents of rail supporting these small volumes would depend upon the type of
operation
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile
Industrial Manufacturing Shipped by Rail in the US in 2010Source: US Surface Transportation Board (STB) 2020 Public Carload Waybill Sample
• 43.7 Million tons of Pulp, paper or allied products The top categories include:– 17.9 Million tons of Fiberboard, Paperboard and Pulp board– 9.7 Million tons of Pulp
• 39.1 Million tons of Transportation Equipment. The top categories include:– 16.4 Million tons of Assembled Motor Vehicles– 8.3 Million tons of Assembled Trucks
• Rail could play a role in supporting economic development initiatives in the Yuma Region
• The extent of rail relevancy will depend upon the nature of the manufacturing
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile
Logistics and Distribution• Rail could play a role in supporting economic development initiatives in Yuma
County• The extent of rail relevancy will depend upon the nature of the products to be
distributed• Rail is often used to for building supply hubs • Retail distribution hubs are frequently coupled with rail intermodal service
– Volumes generated would need to be substantial for containerized intermodal service to be viable
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Imperial County, California and Mexico• Imperial County’s economy is similar to Yuma County’s in terms of its reliance on
agriculture• Imperial County’s manufacturing sector has been more resilient than that of Yuma
County• San Luis Rio Colorado (SLRC) has a lower population (178,380 people in 2010) than
Mexicali (936,826 people in 2010)• Agriculture is a major source of employment in both SLRC and Mexicali• By tonnage, Yuma County’s most significant trading partners are the Los Angeles
and Phoenix metropolitan areas, as well as other parts of Arizona.
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile
Yuma County Freight FlowsSource: FHWA Freight Analysis Framework – 3 (FAF3)
• FAF3 has 3 zones in Arizona (e.g., Phoenix, Tucson and the remainder of the State)• Yuma County is a part of the remainder of the State FAF zone• FAF3 estimates international trade flows with 8 foreign trade zones• Commodities are categorized in 43 groups• Commodities in Yuma County are disaggregated from the remainder of the State
information• The disaggregated model serves as the input to the Arizona Statewide
Transportation model
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Yuma County Truck FlowsSource: FHWA Freight Analysis Framework – 3 (FAF3)
• In 2012, 83% of total truck tonnage were accounted for in the following areas.– 32% Remainder of Arizona– 31% Los Angeles– 20% Phoenix
• The highest tonnage products shipped into and out of Yuma County are building materials and agricultural food products
• Other high volume markets include Las Vegas, San Diego, and Tucson
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Cross Border Trends/FlowsSource: FHWA Freight Analysis Framework – 3 (FAF3)
• San Luis is the 5th busiest border crossing along among primary points of entry along Arizona and California
• 73% of the products imported through San Luis are agricultural products• Over half of the shipments that cross at San Luis originate or terminate in Phoenix or
Tucson. • Trade with Mexico are a small portion of Yuma County’s inbound and outbound
freight flow as a % of total truck tonnage
Item 2012 2035Exports to Mexico from Yuma County 0.33% 0.61%Imports from Mexico to Yuma County 0.51% 0.72%
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Cross Border Trends/Flows• Factors that could impact cross-border trade include:
– Development of the Port of Punta Colonet– Improvements to the Port of Guaymas– The Western CANAMEX Passage– Maquiladora plants to manufacturing in China
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile
Role of Freight Rail• Rail is a mode of transportation used for transporting commodities long distances• The economics of rail over trucking improve with distance• The economics of rail improve with the ability to ship entire trainloads from one
origin to one destination• New rail lines address specific transportation needs accessing a particular shipper
or set of shippers.
Distance Range All Modes Rail Truck Other % Rail
Less than 50 miles 13,897,488 505,008 11,497,265 1,895,215 4%
50 - 99 miles 2,510,268 197,490 1,918,711 394,067 8%
100 - 249 miles 3,170,630 687,285 1,940,368 542,977 22%
250 - 499 miles 2,119,980 671,176 1,046,340 402,464 32%
500 - 749 miles 1,237,915 523,644 462,975 251,296 42%
750 - 999 miles 1,031,758 574,882 262,550 194,326 56%
More than 1,000 miles 1,086,505 531,139 374,975 180,391 49%
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Yuma County Economic and Freight Profile Summary
Role of Freight Rail In Yuma County• Gravel, Waste/Scrap, and Agricultural Products may have the highest number of
tons that could potentially be diverted from truck to rail• Rail improvements targeted at these products could warrant additional
consideration• The need for improved rail access appears to be a major issue for Yuma County
– GYEDC notes that the region is frequently at a disadvantage bidding on economic development projects due to a lack of land and facilities with rail access
– There are no truck/rail multimodal facilities in the region, including no publicly available trans load facilities
Next Steps• Involve developing specific project alternatives that will consider:
1. the location or potential location of impacted industries2. the type of rail service to be provided 3. the feasibility of connecting to existing rail infrastructure
• Rail improvements that benefit the transportation of produce• Rail improvements that benefit the transportation of other agricultural products• Rail improvements that benefit the transportation of food products• Rail improvements that will benefit future economic development initiatives,
particularly in food manufacturing and industrial manufacturing• Rail improvements that improve transportation to/from Phoenix• Rail improvements that benefit the transportation of construction materials,
such as gravel, non-metallic minerals, etc.
Study Process
Universe of Potential Options to Improve Rail in Yuma County
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Preferred Alternative
How to Implement Preferred
Alternative
You are here
Alternative X
ScheduleDeliverable DateFinal Tech Memo #1 Economic and Freight Profile to YMPO
June 1
Public Meeting #2 Mid JuneDraft Tech Memo #2 Evaluation of Rail Alternatives to YMPO
June 29
TAC Meeting #3 Mid JulyFinal Tech Memo #2 to YMPO August 1Public Meeting #3 TBDDraft Tech Memo #3 Implementation of Preferred Alternative AND Draft Tech Memo #4 Economic Impact to YMPO
August 31
TAC Meeting #4 Mid September
Public Meeting #4 TBDFinal Tech Memo #3 AND Final Tech Memo #4 to YMPO September
28Draft Final Report to YMPO October 15TAC Meeting #5 Early
NovemberPublic Meeting #5 TBDFinal Report to YMPO November
18Contract Ends November
18
Questions and Open Discussion