Public Health Preparedness Final Paper
-
Upload
kara-ramos -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
2
Transcript of Public Health Preparedness Final Paper
Improving Emergency Plans and Procedures in the Aftermath of Hurricane Sandy
Professor Sumner
Public Health Preparedness II
Kara Ramos
20 April 2016
Ramos 1
In October 2012, the northeastern part of the United States faced devastating winds and
rain that took the lives of many. The storm named Hurricane Sandy called upon friends,
neighbors, first responders, and the government to come together and help each other. Despite
the government’s attempts to aid the people, nothing could have prevented this from occurring.
However, their lack of preparedness put the lives of many at stake. In response to the storm, the
federal government spent more than $60 billion in emergency spending and this was partly
because of the several declarations FEMA passed over 20 years which took money out of the
Disaster Relief Fund (Bucci, et al., 2013). This was one of the many factors that contributed to
the unorganized efforts by the government, public health officials, and the community. Besides
FEMA’s role during and after the storm, we must also look at the role and responsibility of the
state's, community, and the National and Coast Guard. Finally, it is also important to look at
vulnerable populations of which are often overlooked. These issues show the areas that our
country should strengthen and improve. The underlying problems that each of these issues have
are the lack of communication and coordination between all levels of government and the
community. Despite improvements from previous disasters such as Hurricane Katrina, the
mistakes of Hurricane Sandy could have been avoided with proper planning and better decision
making. The issues of this disaster depict the importance of implementing programs and
procedures in preparation for major disasters such as this event.
To understand where America went wrong amidst the disaster of Hurricane Sandy, we
must look at the planning and communication process in hospitals, the role and responsibilities
of FEMA, the National Guard, as well as the states. Finally, it is necessary to look at the
coordination and communication barrier between public health officials and the at-risk
population. Hurricane Sandy was presented with many failures including electricity in hospitals.
Ramos 2
This made it difficult for medical staff to properly care for their patients. In the article,
“Hurricane Sandy: Lessons Learned, Again”, authors David M. Abramson and Irwin Redlener
talk about the shortage of medical staff such as doctors and nurses, and the problems they faced.
For instance, in a Bronx gym, hospital staff volunteered to help disabled individuals from adult
homes who came with no medical records. In addition, the staff in a Manhattan hospital had to
carry patients down flights of stairs that were dimly lit because the generators failed. In reality,
however, there was a lack of preparedness that existed in all these situations during Sandy and
could have been avoided with planning beforehand (Abramson & Redlener, 2012). These authors
argue that the public’s response to issues such as evacuation of residents where the storm would
greatly affect, could have been acted upon in a timely matter. In this case, it is important to
communicate to at-risk populations that may be affected, before, during and after the event
(Abramson & Redlener, 2012).Over the past 10 years, public health emergency preparedness,
has without a doubt, made important contributions and changes in “command and
communication, assuring appropriate and rapid supply chains, and training the medical and
public health workforces to respond appropriately” (Abramson & Redlener, 2012). Despite this,
medical and public health officials failed to provide sufficient aid to certain areas like the
Rockaways, Coney Island, Staten Island and New Jersey, after the storm. Much of this had to do
with the lack of organization, coordination, and communication among all levels. Public health
systems should learn, again, the importance of coordinated structures especially in crises. Also,
they should make sure that there resources, in case of an emergency, like fuel for generators or
having electronic medical records, should always be available (Abramson & Redlener, 2012). It
is important that hospitals have plans, procedures, and extra resources in place in the event of a
storm so they can tend to the needs of their patients. In the Journal of the American Medical
Ramos 3
Association, Tia Powell, Dan Hanfling, and Lawrence Gostin explain the failures of healthcare
institutions to provide the necessary care to injured patients because they did not have the
capacity to care for large influx of patients (Powell, Hanfling, Gostin, 2012). For instance, many
New York Hospitals had better emergency plans and access to more resources like back up
generators. However, there was still much to be assessed and the whole evacuation process could
have been more organized. In this case, there should have been better rules and guidelines for the
evacuation process (Powell, Hanfling, Gostin, 2012). Even after Hurricane Sandy, hospitals
found it difficult to perform certain operations and provide patient care to a number of people.
This poses a health problems due to the limited access to healthcare, puts pressure on health care
systems who have lost many patients because they could not accommodate for everyone’s needs,
and creates financial problems (Powell, Hanfling, Gostin, 2012). There are a variety of issues
that federal, state, and local officials must focus on especially collaboration and communication
during catastrophic events. This gives public health officials the responsibility to work alongside
organizations to decided whether or not transferring patients, for instance, is necessary when
there is not enough room for them in the hospital (Powell, Hanfling, Gostin, 2012). It is the
responsibility of the government and healthcare authorities to work in unison with other
organizations to make this happen and it is their responsibility to make sure they have rules and
equipment in place for future events.
Another issue was FEMA’s lack of cooperation during Hurricane Sandy that made
recovery difficult. In a report by The Heritage Foundation Emergency Preparedness Working
Group, a list of lessons from Hurricane Sandy were summarized in which it recommended that
FEMA should not focus on every disaster especially routine disasters to ensure that they have
enough resources and money to aid the affected areas in a more efficient and timely matter. To
Ramos 4
add, both the National and Coast Guard should maintain organization of roles and resources as it
did during the storm for future storms. Finally, states should be given the authority to respond
and help the community (Bucci, et al., 2013). These recommendations suggest the lack of
planning and preparing that went on before,during, and after the event. The aftermath of
Hurricane Sandy highlighted FEMA’s lack of aid to affected areas. As stated previously, the
federal government spent more that $60 billion dollars for emergency cases like this because
money was taken out of the Disaster Relief Fund multiple times for other disasters (Bucci, et al.,
2013). Over the past 20 years, declarations have been made to address the multiple disasters-
disasters both catastrophic and not catastrophic- so it should have been no surprise that the DRF
had little money to provide financial aid to the affected areas and states on the east coast. The
obvious solution would have been for FEMA to save the money in the DRF so that when bigger,
more catastrophic disasters did occur, they could use it to provide resources to the community. In
addition, saving would mean the federal government would not have to turn to emergency
spending as much. The authors also suggest that there should be clear standards to define which
disasters or situations qualify for emergency spending (Bucci, et al., 2013). However, despite
FEMA’s passive role in the storm, it has certainly improved from previous events like Hurricane
Katrina. One aspect is their use of social media during the storm to make sure communities were
updated as frequently as possible. In an article called “Sandy Marked a Shift for Social Media
Use in Disasters”, author Sara Estes Cohen explains the positive impact of social media during
Sandy and FEMA’s cooperation in it. Throughout the storm, FEMA constantly used social media
where they informed people in the community about news regarding the storm and also shared
information before the storm to keep them prepared. They also made sure they knew what was
going on in the affected areas by looking at messages posted on social media platforms such as
Ramos 5
Twitter and Facebook (Cohen, 2013). FEMA made it possible to communicate with others and
successfully spread important information to the public. Its role in Hurricane Sandy is both a
lesson to be learned but it also shows their coordinated effort in communicating with the affected
communities which should be seen in future disasters.
It is also important to give responsibility to the states because this allows them to
respond and recover from the disaster directly and it would relieve the burden FEMA has. This
would allow FEMA more time to prepare and take precautionary measures rather than to only
respond to the situation when it occurs. For many years, FEMA has spent money on less
devastating events where places were left without assistance for many days- Staten Island being
one of them (Bucci, et al., 2013). For the most part, it is evident that the storm would have been
less of a “disaster” if FEMA would do its job by focusing much of its attention to catastrophic
events that impact the community on a greater level. State and community cooperation is
necessary to keep everything running smoothly and efficiently.
Despite the disorganization during and after the disaster, both the Coast Guard and
National Guard worked successfully up to the recovery phase. After learning from the failures of
Hurricane Katrina, “dual-status commanders” were implemented and trained to “reduce
redundancies”(Bucci, et al., 2013). To this effect, they qualified as both state and federal
authority and this structure allowed both state and federal commanders to get instructions from
the same workforce and allowed them to work in a timely and efficient manner. In this way,
60,000 national guardsmen were on alert and ready to help if they were needed and even though
not all guardsmen were used, it shows their preparedness efforts in dealing with the crisis. Their
role was search and rescue, providing food and water, clearing debris and roads, controlling
traffic and more ( Bucci, et al., 2013). The same was true for the Coast Guard and the number of
Ramos 6
important roles they played during and after Sandy like search and rescue. While the efforts of
both the National and Coast Guard were successful during Sandy, it is important to continue to
learn from the mistakes of Sandy in order to ensure success for future events, adopt and accept
the “dual-status commander” role that was created during the storm. Another important change
that needs to take place is that Congress should update the Coast Guard fleet in order to meet the
needs of a greater number of people (Bucci, et al., 2013). The role of the National and Coast
Guard portray the importance of implementing and maintaining the structure and status held by
these commanding forces.
Another major issue that needed to be addressed during and after the storm, was the need
to aid the vulnerable populations. Hurricane Sandy exposed the problems that lay in basic
foundations of public health efforts. This can be seen in many organizations who do not
communicate effectively with other organizations or groups, and the populations and areas that
are isolated and are a possible target to these natural disasters. It is important to include the
community in planning and response efforts and in order to do this, communication is key in
bridging the gap between the community and health professionals and officials. First responders,
for instance, were not able to help individuals that were not able to survive on their own without
the proper equipment, resources, and aid. Health care professionals and first responders should
be able to address the needs of disabled individuals (both mentally and physically), the elderly,
children, and those who do not speak English, without having to worry about the groups of
individuals who have the ability to take care of themselves (Bucci, et al., 2013). As a result, there
would be higher resilience but this only works if the community is prepared and has the proper
tools to help themselves and eventually, they will be able to help the rest of the community. The
change rests not only in governmental control but in the community’s responsibility to help each
Ramos 7
other. The New York City Housing Authority is just one example of the lack of authority that
went on during the storm that affected many disabled and elderly people. Other agencies in the
city along with NYCHA already had a list of people who needed assistance but no one bothered
to plan ahead in times of emergencies so that these public housing residents get the right amount
of medical aid. To add, these organizations still do not have plans in place when the next event or
disaster strikes. About 50% of adults living in public housing in New York City lived alone and
79% had two or more chronic health conditions (Chavkin, 2013). These vulnerable residents
were trapped in buildings for a long period of time in the dark and with little to no aid from the
city (Chavkin, 2013). It is important to address the needs of everyone especially the at-risk
populations. Authors, Sophia Jan and Nicole Lurie, add that public health officials in disaster
preparedness emphasize the need to have strong systems laid out and “the need to build
community disaster resilience and reduce long-term vulnerability” (Jan & Lurie, 2012). This
article stresses the need to shift into a more technologically savvy world by highlighting the
benefits of electronic records and new technology in general. In order to do build community
resilience, we must focus on implementing and supporting health information systems, like
creating electronic medical records. This would allow individuals with disabilities to still receive
treatment and medication at home because their medical records would be accessible. In
addition, electronic records would create a better and smoother system of coordination for caring
for disabled individuals. Adopting a more technological approach to accessing information can
improve the quality of care and improve communication (Jan & Lurie, 2012). For example,
creating more reliant home generators can help charge equipment or tools that people with
functional needs, need (Jan & Lurie, 2012). Better community resilience is not only found in the
development of technology but also the integration and involvement of people with functional
Ramos 8
needs to be a part of the emergency preparedness and response planning so that federal, state,
and local officials can assess the problems that they may have so that they will be able to avoid
any future problems when a disaster occurs. Finally, laws and policies should be passed and
emphasized that target disabled individuals. Becoming more reliant on better technology and
laws would create stronger community resilience which, in turn, would address the population
at-risk and prevent any injuries or illnesses (Jan & Lurie, 2012). Besides addressing the the
needs of the vulnerable population in response to a crisis like Hurricane Sandy, it is necessary to
focus on the potential mental health risks that can manifest in certain groups or populations. Dr.
Yuval Neria and Dr. James M. Schultz illustrate the effect of being exposed to a disaster and the
mental health problems that may form, depending on the severity of the disaster (Neria & Shultz,
2012). Furthermore, factors of race, ethnicity, disability status, etc., contribute to the
development of develop mental health problems after being exposed to a crisis. The aspect of
focusing on the potential mental health risks in affected populations is needlessly overlooked.
This article helps introduce ways to prevent and alleviate the burden of mental health risks from
a disaster like Hurricane Sandy. In this way, affected and vulnerable populations should be
closely monitored so that they can be treated effectively. In addition, those who had a mental
illness before the storm and those who are at risk for developing a mental illness linked to crisis
or disaster like PTSD should also be treated with proper care (Neria & Shultz, 2012). But most
importantly, prevention above anything else is the best strategy to avoiding unnecessary actions
or plans. A few ways to address this is to let the others know that they are safe by creating a
strong support system which would lessen the tension and ease the stress that they may have
from the disaster. Reducing stress could ultimately decrease the risk of developing a mental
illness like anxiety or depression (Neria & Shultz, 2012). In an article called “Overcoming the
Ramos 9
Challenges of Protecting Vulnerable Populations During a Disaster”, writer Noah Reiter
explains the challenges of helping a vulnerable population and the solutions to address this. Like
authors Neria and Shultz, Reiter argues that when helping at-risk populations, it is necessary to
include them and encourage them be a part of the whole community to gain their trust and
participation throughout this whole event. One way to do this is to introduce and encourage them
to join advocacy groups or other organizations (Reiter, 2014). Increasing trust allows them to
communicate with the rest of the community and government officials about their needs. The
devastation that Hurricane Sandy has caused illustrates the positive impact of prevention
methods in populations affected by the crisis especially vulnerable populations. Authors Irwin
Redlener and Michael Reilly, emphasize the importance of working as a team. For example,
patients would not be cared for if there would be little to no resources available or knowing
where the elderly or disabled can help responders monitor their health status and distribute any
resources that they may need (Redlener & Reilly, 2012). Having the proper resources and better
communication could not only ease the burden of first responders, for instance, but also the at-
risk populations that may need the most aid. To add, addressing a number of individuals who not
only have physical disabilities but possibly not speaking English or may have mental disabilities
is challenging but we must work to understand and communicate effectively with them. For
example, not everyone can hear or see so it is important to accommodate to everyone’s needs by
having messages that address these issues like having messages in Braille or videos with subtitles
(Reiter, 2014). These various events and problems vulnerable populations faced is just one of
many lessons from Hurricane Sandy that our country needs to learn and improve from to prevent
this from happening in the future.
Ramos 10
Nevertheless, the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy was certainly eye opening for many and
the federal government has in many ways, taken bigger steps to address the situation in response
to the disaster. John Manuel describes the necessary steps taken in the aftermath of Hurricane
Sandy that would prevent any future problems. For example, President Obama passed the
Disaster Relief Appropriations Act “which provides $16 billion in Community Development
Block Grant Disaster Relief funds to repair and restore areas affected by Hurricane Sandy”
(Manuel, 2013). Obama along with other states such as New York and New Jersey have
advocated to build resilience among affected communities which allow them to be prepared for
future disasters. The main goal is to improve resiliency across all domains which means “getting
people back into their homes and apartments, restoring business and community
infrastructure…”(Manuel, 2013). Although it is not an easy task at hand, the government shows
that they have come a long way by learning about the mistakes that could have been avoided.
Even though there were many failures in terms of coordination, communication, and ability to
provide aid to certain populations, there were some lessons learned from previous disasters like
Hurricane Katrina.
In conclusion, there were many mistakes during Sandy that provide a window of
opportunity to learn from to avoid future mistakes. The problem lay mostly in the
communication and coordination efforts between the public health infrastructure and
government, and the community. This lack of communication between healthcare professionals,
first responders, government and the community illustrates America’s need to create programs
and procedures to ensure these mistakes will not happen in the future. The roles of FEMA, the
National and Coast Guard, especially in disaster events like Sandy is necessary as well as
emphasizing the need to work as a team with the community and public health officials to
Ramos 11
provide the necessary supplies to survive. Sandy taught us that everyone’s needs and health
should be addressed which includes at-risk populations who need help the most and it most
importantly showed the need to have plans in place especially in hospitals where there many be
an influx of patients that need to be cared for. Apart from this, it also showed the need to use
social media as a platform for communication so that everyone was updated with news. The
lessons learned from this event will help better our public health infrastructure and save the lives
of many.
Ramos 12
Work Cited
Abramson, D.M., & Redlener, I. (2012). Hurricane Sandy: Lessons Learned, Again. Disaster
Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Disaster Med. Public Health Prep., 6(04),
328-329.
Bucci, S., Lesser, J., Inserra, D., Mayer, M.A., Slattery, B., Spencer, J., & Tubb, K. (2013,
October 24). After Hurricane Sandy: Time to Learn and Implement the Lessons in
Preparedness, Response, and Resilience. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/10/after-hurricane-sandy-time-to-learn-
and-implement-the-lessons
Chavkin,S. (2013, February 1). Lack of Authority, Retrieved April 2, 2016, from
http://www.thenewyorkworld.com/author/schavkin/
Cohen, S. E. (2013, March 7). Sandy Marked a Shift for Social Media Use in Disasters.
Retrieved April 12, 2016, from http://www.emergencymgmt.com/disaster/Sandy-Social-
Media-Use-in-Disasters.html?page=2
Jan,S., & Lurie,N. (2012). Disaster Resilience and People with Functional Needs. New England
Journal of Medicine N Engl J Med, 367(24), 2272-2273. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
Manuel, J. (2013). The Long Road to Recovery: Environmental Health Impacts of Hurricane
Sandy. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(5). doi:10.1289/ehp.121-a152
Neria, Y., & Shultz, J. M. (2012). Mental Health Effects of Hurricane Sandy. Jama,308(24),
2571. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.110700
Powell, T., Hanfling, D., & Gostin, L.O. (2012). Emergency Preparedness and Public Health:
The Lessons of Hurricane Sandy. Jama,208(24), 2569. Retrieved March 12, 2016.
Ramos 13
Redlener, I., & Reilly, M.J. (2012). Lessons from Sandy-Preparing Health Systems for Future
Disasters. New England Journal of Medicine N Engl J Med, 367(24), 2269-2271.
Reiter, N. (2014, October 7). Overcoming the Challenges of Protecting Vulnerable Populations
During a Disaster. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from
http://www.emergencymgmt.com/disaster/Overcoming-Challenges-Protecting-
Vulnerable-Populations.html