Public Disclosure Authorized -E-382 · Public Disclosure Authorized ... The geographic area covered...

-E-382

WEST JAVA JAKARTA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT

DRAFT

PROGRAMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL REVEIW

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

\\est Java JakArta Eiiviron nicnt]l .Man:ge m.ent Projcct (WVJJENLP) Prograninnic Enviroiinrnental Ret ieNw Page i

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ............ i

TabNes .U!.... i

Figures .............. iii

1.0 Executive Sumnzmar.. il

2.0 Project Settin .iv

2.1 Community Participation Aspects .

3.0 Adaptable Progranm Loan and Environmnental Managemient ....................................v

4.0 Progrant CompoientIs .v

5.0 Conclutsiotns and Recoinniendations .vi-

5.1 Proposed Mlitigation or Environmental Safeguard .vii

5.2 Component 3 - Small/Medium Scale Industries .vii5.2.1 Proposed Institutional Arrangements ................................................... vii

5.3 Component 4 - Community Environmental Facilit) (CEF) ........................................ viii5.3.1 Proposed Institutional Arrangements ................................................... viii

5.4 Component 6 - Environmental Management ....................................... ix5.4.1 Proposed Environmental Mitigation .................. ................................. ix

1.0 BACKGROUND .

1.1 Introduction .I

2.0 Project Setting .

2.1 Physical Environment .2

2.2 Demograph .. 3

2.3 Socioeconomic Profile ................ 3: 3

2.4 Structural Change .................. .4

2.5 District and Mlunicipal Profile .4

2.6 Environmental Change .4

3.0 Commnunitt Participationi Aspects .5

4.0} Adaptable Programn Loami and Environmnental Aanagenlent .64.1 Project Initiation Phase (APL 1) .8

4.2 Acceleration Phase (APL 2) .9

4.3 Institutionalization Phase (APL 3) .10

5.0 Prograin Conmponents . 11

5.1 Component I - Project Support. I I

5.2 Comnponent 2 - Solid Waste .12

5.3 Component 3 -Small/Medium Scale Industry Support .14

5.4 Component 4 - Environmental Education and Awareness .15

;4'est Jcn7 Jakarta Ein irownemai Management Project (riJEAfP)

WeLst J a%a Jak Environmentul M [anagenent Project (WNJJE-ITP) Progranimisc Environmental Re%icw Page mi

5.5 Component 5 - Community Environment Facility ......................................................... 15

5.6 Comnponent 6 - Environmental Mlanagement ............................................................... 18

6.0 Environmental Screeningt, ........................................................ 19

6.1 Operational Policy 4.01 ................................................................ 19

6.2 GOI AMDAL Procedures ............................................................... 20

6.3 GOI Screening Criteria ................................................................ 20

7.0 Potetzlial En vironmental Impacts ........................................................ 21

7.1 Component 2 - Solid Waste Subcomponents Involving the Construction, Operation and

Rehabilitation of Final Disposal Sites (TPA's) ............................................................. 22

7.2 Component 3 - Small and Medium Scale Industry Subcomponent Which RequiresFinancial Intermediary Lending ..................... ........................................... 27

7.3 Component 5 - Community Environmental Facility ................................ .................... 28

7.4 Component 6 - Environmental MIanagement ............................................................... 30

7.5 Training ............................................................... 31

8.0 Coniclusions & Recommenzdations . ................................................................ 33

8.1 Component 2 - Solid Waste ............................................................... 348.1.1 Proposed Mitigation or Environmental Safeguard .34

8.2 Component 3 - Small/Medium Scale Industries .. 348.2.1 Proposed Institutional Arranements .35

8.3 Component 4 - Community Environmental Facilit) (CEF). 358.3.1 Proposed Institutional Arranements. 358.3.2 CEF Environment Checklist .36

8.4 Component 6 - Environmental lanageent . .368.4.1 Proposed Environmental MNlitigation .37

Tables

Table 2-1: List of ILocal Govemments in Project Area .Table 2-1: List of Local Governments in Project Area ............................................................ .Table '-': Comparison of Population and Growth Rates - 1990-96 Project Area .Table 2-3: Population of the Specific Project Area 1994 .Table 2-4: Rainfall (mm) in Jakarta and Bandung, 199. 3Table 2-5: River Discharge Volumes DKI and West Java Province. 3Table 3-1: Summary of Local Environmental Issues - Phase I Community Participation. Table 7-1: Indicative List of Defined CEF Subprojects .2STable 7-2: List of Defined Environmental NManagement Projects .31Table 7-3: Proposed Training Program ................................................................................. 3 3

Figures

Fi ure 5- 1: CEF Implementation Orgzanization .. . 17

ii ki:rtJ.Ln Emrro ne0ta<lul .t.fLigemrerw Project (TiJ1JE.tfP)

\Xtst Ja.a Jakarta Eor ironnien Ual Ianagement Project (XXJJENIP) Programnmic Environimental Re iens Page ix

Programmatic Environmental ReviewvWN'est Java Jakarta Environmental Management Program (WJJEMP)

1.0 Executive Summary

1. Chemonics International Inc. (Consultant) is the program preparation consultant for theWest Java Jakarta Environmental Management Program (hereafter referred to as WJJElIP).The objective of the Program is:

to improve environmenital quality, human health an7d economic productivity in theuzrban areas of WSest Java and Jakarta throurghi polluition redurction and a program ofenvironmental improvements. Secondaiy objectives are to promizote povertyalleviationi, employment generationi and inidutstrial efficiency.

2. The objectives of the Programrnmatic Enviromnental ReViewV (PER) are to:

- Review project documentation;- Identify the broad potential environmental impacts of relevant project

components of the Program;- Assess and screen the proposed projects using the requirements of the

Governmnent of Indonesia (GOD AMDAL procedures and the World Bank-Operational Policy 4.01 (OP 4.01) in the context of an Adaptable ProgramLoan (APL);

* Propose appropriate rmitigations an-d /or environmental safeguards; and,- Propose institutional and /or training requirements to ensure that there is

adequate capacity to influence and monitor the environmental outcomes of theProgram.

2.0 Project Setting

3. The geographic area covered is the greater Jakarta Metropolitan area including DKIJakarta, Bogor, Tangerang, and Bekasi, plus otler urban portions of West Java includingBandung, Cirebon and Cilegon (the latter described in the documentation as KabupatenSerang). The total number of local governments involved in the Program is fourteen. Theselocal government areas are listed in Tabe 2-1.

Table 2-1: List of Local Governments in Project Area

Seran, Kabupaten (Cilegon Kotamnadya) - Cirebon Kotarnadva- Cirebon Kabupaten - Bandung Kotamadva- Bandung Kabupaten - Bogor Kotamadya

Bogor Kabupaten - Tangerang Kotarnadva- Tangerang Kabupaten - Bekasi Kotamadva- Bekasi Kabupaten - Depok Kotarnadya

- DKI Jakarta - Province of West Java

lest java Jakarta Emironrnetital ltaniagerneni Project (;JJE.VI)

NNest Java Jakarta Environmental Maniagement Projct (NNJJEdIP) Proaninisic Environmental Revies Page

2.1 CONINIUNITY'PARTICIPATION'.ASPECTS

4. Consistent wvith recent Government policies, the Program development methodology wvas

based on a consultative "bottom up" process. To obtain input, the Program conductedinterviews with a wide range of stakeholders drawn from Government at all levels, NGOs,the private sector, community groups, development institutions and universies. It isestimated that over 500 information-gathering interviews were held. In addition to identifyingpriority environmental issues and relevant interventions, four special workshops were held,one each in Jabotabek, Bandung, Serang and Cirebon. The comnunity information andparticipation program was the basis for the development of a list of projects that were then

evaluated and prioritized wvith regard to criteria developed from Program objectives.

3.0 Adaptable Program Loan and Environmental Management

5. The GOI has expressed interest in applying for an Adaptable Program Loan (APL) insupport of the WJJEMP. APLs are a sequence of projects supported by separate loans, to

support phased implementation of long-term development programs w1 hen there is clearagreement on objectives, but where the path to achieve them requires leaming from results.APLs allow a better response for certain development problems and from the GOI's point ofview, stand for (i) continuity for lon-term development, particularly for environmental.management activities; (ii) allow for a demand-driven expansion of the APL as changes inscope are identified during project implementation; and (iii) aUow for more flexible andtimely responses to changing needs. For WJJEMIP, this requires tht an environmentalmanagement framework be developed based on a number of stages prior to projectimplementation.

6. The implementation of WJJEMP is proposed as a 9 year program and it is planned tooccur over three phases: (i) Initiation Phase (APL I/Years 1-3); (ii) Acceleration Phase (APL2/TYears 4-6); and (iii) Institutionalization Phase (APL 3/Years 7-10). The main objective ofAPL 1 is to establish the framework} for enxironmental interventions and specializedprogrms in environmental education, srnallAiedium scale industries, and comnmunity

environment The objective of APL 2 is improvement in environmental quality through-implementation of directed investments and software interventions. The objective of APL 3 isto continue the program of environmental improvements through new interventionsdeveloped as WJJENIP evolves.

4.0 Program Components

The Logical Framework Analysis (LFA) conducted during the third phase of programplanning grouped the proposed subprojects into six rajor components:

* Project Support through Technical Assistance (TA);

* Solid 'Waste Management;

* SmalUiMledium Scale Industry Support;

* Environmental Education and Awareness;

* Conmiunitv Environment Facility (CEF); and,

iest JA a Jakarta Emnirowunerwal Mtanagentent Project ({l EMfP)

\rs tJava Jak1rtaEnvironnuental lanagenient Project(A(JJE.MP) Programnaic En ironriental Review- Page *i

EnVironmental Management.1

7. The LEFA grouping also revealed that of the 130 subprojects, of those remaining afterexclusion of non-qualifying ones, approximately 30 Xvere comrnmunity and 20 small-scaleindustry subprojects. Improvements for both communities and small-scale industries are to beaddressed through private sector initiatives using a financial intermediary on-lendingstructure. The remaining 80 long listed subprojects in the areas of project support, solidwaste, environmental education and awareness and environmental management have beenproposed to be implemented by GOI. About 30 of these subprojects could be consolidated,resulting in a final list of about 50 recommended GOI sponsored subprojects.

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

8. WJJEMIP was reviewed in relation to C)P4.01 and the GOI AMNDAL procedures. Inaddition to the Bank and GOI environmental requirements, the design of WJJEMP is furtherstrengthened through the selection of the Bank's Adaptable Program Loan (APL) approach.APL offers the GOI the necessary flexibility required, as a phased approach to borrowing willallow the govenmuent to make any necessary adjustments to the Program that Will improvethe overall environmental performance of related activities. During APL 1, overallenvironmental management protection will be the primary focus Aith policy developmentand ervironmental planning measures developed during the first three years. Infrastnicturedevelopment, including the development of sanitary landfills, will be the main thirust underAPL 2, and xvili be guided by the early adoption of environmental measures thus contributingtowards sound environmental management.

9. Four of the six components which were found to contain subprojects that requiredscreening under the combined World Bank and GOI procedures. Using these combinedrequirements it is considered that the program would be a Category B project.

10. For Component 2 - Solid Waste projects that involve the development of sanitarylandfills are considered to be Category B. The impacts of such projects are xwell understood.The impacts are generally site-specific and few if any of them are irreversible; and in mostcases mitigation measures can be designed. Also, all of the landfills proposed are being-designed as sanitary landfills (as opposed to controlled), wvhich will require high standards ofleachate drainage and gas generation control.. However, exceptions regarding the finaldecision for carrying out a full ANDAIJRKIRPL assessment for the development of a nexvproposed landfill at Cirebon may be left to local government (PENIDA), particularly if it isfelt that the area will eventually increase in size (over 7,000 ' day), or there Wvill besignificant opposition fromn local communities.

Env ironmcntal Mlanagement includes subprojects in integrated domestic'industial X astewater treatrnent, airqualitv, domestic sanitation coupled with river water protection, inter regional riverbasin planning andgreening.

liest Java Jlakara E,rv,ro,untenrrJ .!aznagemzen: Project (IL/JEltIP)

\V ust Jav a Jakarta EnN iron lental Manageement Project (WNJJEMIP) Progranmmic Environmental Reoiew Page X II

5. 1 PROPOSED IN1TIGATION OR UN;NIRON) IENTAL SAFEGU.ARD

11. Environrmental 'Management (RKL) and Monitoring (RPL) Plans are a requirement whenan -ANDAL is prepared. In order to ensure that these plans are relevant, financially Viable andprovide the appropriate level of information, a rinimum set of requirements for theRKIJRKL should be included in the Terms of Reference (TOR) for all ANDAL's beingprepared for this component.

12. Building on the requirements of UKDAJPL, Environmental Management and MonitoringPlans (RKIJRPL's) should include recommended actions by the Contractor to be included inContract Specifications. Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) to include: (i) a thoroughbut relevant description of the environmental context of proposed or existing site; (ii) adescription/analysis of alternate sites within a spatial planning context and (ii) a descriptionof the 'Community Consultation Program' carried out which includes all stakeholders andarrangements for on-going consultation.

13. A Site Management Plan should include:

* Proposed area of site with projected volumes;

* Site layout;

* Soil and geology with geotechnical data and relevant analysis;

* Type of lining proposed;

* Underdrainage proposed;

* Vent drainage proposed;

* Overburden removal and storage;

* Cell development plan;

* Leachate treatment desigrn;

* Operation and maintenance profile; and,

• Projected budgets including equipment schedule, staff with totalrunning cost per annum.

D.2 COM\PONENT 3 - SmAIJITEDIUM SCALE INDUSTRIES

14. These industries are wvidespread in the project area with higlly polluted Xvastewaterflovs which are presently discharged to the local drainage systems. As the proposal is forintermnediary lending the project should be screened as "Category Fl with potential CategoryB impacts".

5.2.1 Proposed Institutional Arrangements

15. The potential issue for consideration is to ensure that the institutional arrangementsbetveen B.APEDAL (responsible for subproject review) and BAXPEDALDA (DKI and WestJava) (responsible for a monitoring plan and on-going review) have been clarified. This isdue to the perception within BAPEDAL that BAPEDALDA do not currently have resources

lles J; a Jo;carta Einrirotinie,ual, tfanagemem:z Project (0IJ.JE,T)

XNest Ja a Jakarta Enviroinnental N lanagenaent Project (WNJJE-NIP) Progranuniiic En%iron ncntal Rtc icN Pagc i:I

to address environmental managlenment issues for small and medium-scale industries. EN-enthough there are resources being made available in the loan to bolster the capacitv ofBAPEDALDA, discussions conceming the proposed institutional arrangements as to rolesand responsibilities and point of hand-over should be agreed between the parties w ith theobjective of preparing a MNermorandum of Understanding (M%/OU). It may be necessary forBAPEDAL to continue with the monitoring function for the first year ntnil the additionalcapacity is in place at the BAPEDALDA. It is proposed that all activities over Rp. 1 billionshould involve the local BAPEDALDA xwhen formulating an EMP. The learning experiencewvill contribute to strengthen the institutions through their involvement in thle Project. Thoiparticipation should also be based on their own tmining initiatives and should also be used asa gauge for their continued involvement.

16. The extent of responsibility of the Bank for participating in the environmental irmpactand management of the subprojects should also be made clear. It is recommnended that thereshould be training in approved enrironmental procedures given to Bank staff responsible forloan appraisal. This Will allow the Bank- to fully participate in appraisal activities.

5.3 COMPONENT4 - CO.\1NIUNITY DN1;NROINM,1 EiNTAL FACILITY (CEF)

17. As the Program will be using an onlending facility, OP4.01 requires that institutionalarranaements for routine screening and if necessary, assessment of the environmental impactsof the subprojects should be caanied out. The component should be classified as Category FTWith potential Category B impacts.


18. The most difficult feature of this component wvill be to identify whom or *whatorganization is the proponent of the action. Under World Bank and GOI procedures it is theproponent of the activity wrho is responsible for environmental assessment. In many cases itmay be a reasonably diffuse community group and in other cases a specific .small industryentrepreneur. In order to ensure that environmental screening is routinely caried out it isrecommended that a similar but slightly modified procedure be employed simnilar to that usedin a recent Bankl project i.e. the Kecamatan Development Project (KDP).

19. This wvould involve the preparation of a simple checklist form for each subproject by thefacilitator that would need to be reviewed and checked by the SuLBagpro in consultationwNith the Kabupaten or Kotamadya BAPEDALDA, BAPPEDA and'or delegated authority.The basis for the screening should be a list of questions leading to a conclusion as to whetherthere will be any sigiificant environmental impacts. This checklist should be prepared for allsubprojects and be included as part of the appraisal documentation. These checklists shouldbe sampled by the Bank either routinely by the Jakarta office or during supervision missionsfor quality control purposes. The process must be strengthened how ever in order to meet GOIand Bankl procedures for environmental assessment.

20. It is also considered essential for some training of the Kelurahan level facilitators in theAgreed Environmental Procedures as wvell as to g ive them an understanding of the GOI.VMDsAL process. This requirement should be added to the scope of work of the contract forthe private conranN which is to recruit the local level facilitators.

iwi lnv a Jak:ira Erniro,une,i ManAagemetz: Project (iJJEMFP)

\V est Jav a Jakarta Ens ironniental Nlanagement Project (WJJEMP) Programmiic Environmental ReNieNw Page ix

5.4 CONIPONENT 6 - ENIRONMENTAL iNANAGEM'\E1NT

'-1. This component includes a nLmiber of projects that involve the planuing, construction

and operation of either domestic or industrial wastewater facilities. It is similar to the solidwaste management component in that there are some proposed facilities where there is

potential for significant environmental impacts unless the subprojects are adequately planned

and implemented.

22. The projects, which were defined, include the planning and design of reasonably largewastewater facilities (i.e., 7,000 rn&/day): one for addressing industrial wastewater and onefor domestic wastewater. The domestic wvastewater facilities proposed in Kotamadya

Bandung would be a World Bank Category B project, and therefore a full ANDAL is notrequired under GOI procedures and a draft TOR has been prepared. The industrialwastewater project at Pulogadung Industrial Estate in Jakarta was also considered to be

Category B and a UKIJUPL is to be piepared under GOI procedures as part of the feasibilityreview.

23. Full ANDAL can be specifically requested in order to address particular circumstancessuch as current land use patterns in the area, population levels, current waste managementpractices, plamed developments including future connections to a waste water treatment

plant. In order to ensure a comprehensive environmental assessment, a review of theecological boundary and overlapping administrative boundaries should be addressed.

5.4.1 Proposed Environmental Mitigation

24. The current TOR for the ANDAL for the Kotamadya Bandung wastewater treatmentplant that has been prepared will need to be modified to include a detailed methodology for

ensuring that the community participation aspects of this subproject are emphasized. Thestudy team should include a social planner/sociologist/institutional specialist who will be

responsible for implementation of the communiwty participation and public awarenessprogram. The community preparation phase of this work shoild start at least one year prior tophysical construction in order to increase the likelihood of attracting higher connection rates.

25. Other projects defined to date were screened as Category C projects under World Bank

procedures; they do not come under GOI AMIDAL procedures.

I es: Jc a Jakaria Env:ronmental A.'vzagemerj Project (1IJEMfP)

\\ast Jaxa Jakarta En%ironimienLa] Nlanagement Project (JJEHMP) Programmnic Environmental Review Page i

1.0 BACKGROUND

1.1 INTRODUCTION

26. Chemonics Intemational Inc. (Consultant) is the program preparation consultant for theWest Java Jakarta Environmental Management Program (hereafter referred to as WJJEMfP).The objective of the Project is:

.. to inmprove environmental quality; huzaman 1lealth and economrlic productivity in theuirban? areas of TWest Java and Jakarta throulghi pollution reduction? and a programil ofenvironmental imiiprovements. Secondary objectives are to prolmiote povertyalleviation, employnzvnt generationi and induistrial efficiency."

27. The objectives of the Programmatic Environmental Review are to:

- Review Project documentation;- Identify the broad potential environmental impacts of relevant Project

components of the Program;- Assess and screen lie proposed Projects using the requirements of the

Government of Indonesia (GOI) AMDAL procedures and the World BankOperational Policy 4.01 (OP 4.01) in the context of an Adaptable ProgramLoan (APL);

* Propose appropriate mitigations and /or environmental safeguards; and,* Propose institutional and /or training requirements to ensure that there is

adequate capacity to influence and monitor the environmental outcomes of theprojecL

2.0 Project Setting

2S. The geographic area covered is the greater Jakarta Metropditan area including DKIJakarta Bogor, Tangerang, and Bekasi, plus other urban portions of West Java including

Bandung, Cirebon and Cilegon (the latter described in the documentation as KabupatenSerang). The total number of local govemments involved in the project 's fourteen. Theselocal government areas are listed in Table 21.

TabhL 2-1: List of Local Governments in Project Area

j - Serang Kabupaten (Cilegon Kotarnadva) - Cirebon Kotarnadva-7~ Cirebon Kabupaten - Bandung Kotamadya- Bandung Kabupaten - Bogor Kotarnadya- Bo-or Kabupaten - Tangerang Kotarnadya- lTangerang Kabupaten - Bekasi KotarnadvaI' - Bek-asi Kabupaten - Depokl KotarnadvaI - DKI Jakarta

- Province of West Java

29. As show n in Figure I the prora area is mainlv cenered on1 the northw estern coastalareas of West Java Province, the largest metropolitan area in Indonesia - DKI Jakarta. Table

2-2 shows the relative areas in KM and population statistics for the project area. Thepopulation of the urban and rural portions of the project area is shown in Table 2-3. Thetarget population for the project is the urban component listed in this Table.

Table 2-2: Comparison of Population and Growth Rates - 1990-96 Project Area

its Jcsna Ja.,-ria ETh ,ro,ern,e=J Ar na,ge,,e,t Project (iJ'JJEA1P)

\\est Ja% a Jak:rt Env ironnmntal Management Project iVJJEi\IP) Programniiic En% ironniental Rex iexm Page '

Province/Re-ion Area rb of Population Population AnnualKm, Indonesia 1 1990 Mfillion 1996 Million GrowTh Rate

1990-1996 %DKI Jakarta 590 0.03 8,228 9,341 2 tWest Java 46,300 2.41 35.382 40,117 2.09Java 132,186 6.89 107,527 116.379 1.32

Source:BP S

Table 2-3: Population of the Specific Project Area 1994

Kabupatenl Urban Project Rural TotalKotamadva Area 000's Area 000's 000's

DKI Jakarta 9000 9000Bogor 2888 1526 4414Bandung 1669 1713 3322Cirebon 888 885 1773Bekasi 2137 620 2757Tangerang 1258 1142 2400Cilegon (Serang) 347 1287 1634Bogor 285Bandung 2356Cirebon 254 7 261Tangerang 975 213 1188Total 22057 7393 26749

Source: BPS

2.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONNIENT

30. Jak-arta is the largest city in Indonesia and is a Separate Special Provincial status made upof five local government areas kinown as DKI Jakarta. It is surrounded by West Java provincewhich accounts for 2.4% of the total area of the country. It is only 50 km away from thelargest island of Sumatra on its northwestem tip, across the Sunda Straits. As a result, theprogram area enjoys efficient road and rail links, particularly along the Jakarta-Bandungcorridor. West Java is the fastest growing province in the country, and is home to several-large urban-industrial regions, among them, the Bogor-Tangerant-Bekasi area surroundineDKI Jakarta (these four areas are referred to as Jabotabek), the area in and around theprovincial capital Bandung, and the heavy industry steel and petochemical complex inCilegon on the west coast. The other main city in the province is Cirebon to the east

31. The prov-ince is surrounded by the Java Sea to the north, the Indian Ocean to the southand borders Central Javra to the east. Maximum-Minimum Temperature Range v aries from22.&32 degrees Celsius in Jakarta in Feb to 23-34.1 in October and for Bandung 20.429.4(Jan) and 19.2-29.5 (Sep) degrees Celsius. There is considerable variation in rainfall acrossthe province. The northern plains area has a 6ng dry season (can be 5 months) wvith annualrainfall between 900-1500 mm. In 199S for example, Jakarta had a total rainfall of 924 mmand Bandung 1128 mm (see Table 2-4). This part of the province, w hich includes DKIJakarta, consists largely of flat land areas suitable for irrigated rice cultiv-ation, wvhile thecentral and southem parts are largely mountainous regions of volcanic origin, X ith higherrainfall and rivers of high discharge, making these area -ery productive for agriculture (seeTable 2-5). Bandung, and Bogor Kotamadya and the surrounding k-abupaten (districts) are theonly portions of the project area located in the central mountain area. The rich and densely

1iIest Jhna Jakarta Einmro,!rnernal Mlanogernew Project 6UJJEA P[

Y rest Jav a Jak Ensironment l Mdana-"ement Project (NJJENIP) Progranuiuc Env ironmentlW Rev iews Pagc 3

populated northem plains of West Java and the BandUlng area can be contrsted to therelatively underdeveloped Xwestern and southern parts of the province.

Table 24: Rainfall (mm) in Jakarta and Bandung, 1998

Location Jan Feb jIMar Apr May June July ALL I Scp OCa Nov DecJakanta 499 84 62 7 1 76 OS 1.0 0 0 0 61.2 76.3Bandung 1229 104 106 216' 94 0 16 0 2.7 0 74 2S6

Table 2-5: River Discharge Volumes DKI and NVest Java Pro ince

Province Rivers Catchment Ave Volune of Averaoe Depth of VolumeSampled Kn2 Water Flow Flow Water mm. Million

M3/sec Litres/sec/ Km2 M3/davDKI Cisadane 1146 60 52.3 1655 1896West Java Citarum 1674 75 45.2 1423 2384West Java Cimanukl 1263 35 28 8S2 1116West Java Cimanuk 1966 43 22 691 1360West Java Cibuni 1080 54 51 1606 1735West Java Ciujun,T 1364 85 63 1985 2707

Source: BPS

2.2 DE.M1OGRAPHY

32. West Java, wvith a population of 39.3 million in 1995, overtook East Java as the mostpopulous province in the country in 1990. T he Sunda people, a linguistically and cultirallydistinct ethnic group, largely populate it though large Javanese communities exist aroundJakarta and in the province's eastern border with Central Java. West Java has a density of 850persons per square klometer in 1995 being eight times higher than the Indonesian average of102 persons per square kilometer. Due to higher fertility (3.5 versus 3.3 for Indonesia) and inrmiration from other parts of Java, Sumatra and other parts of countiy, its populationincreased by over 10% in the 1990-95 period and more rapidly than the country. average. Therelatively faster rate of population groxxth, at 2.6% relative to the country average of 2.0% inthis period, was achieved despite its higher infant mortality (90 versus 71 per thousandpopulation for Indonesia). Due to its thriving manufacturing industry before the recentmonetary crisis, the province was experiencing rapid in-migration, estimated at 3.49 personsper thousand population between 1980 and 1990. More recently, relocation of somemanufacturing industries from DKI Jakarta and the construction of large residential estatesoutside DKI Jakarta has further increased the population density of the satellite towns andrural areas around Bogor, Bekasi and Tangerang.

2.3 SOCIOECONOMNIIC PROFILE

3. Followsing the location of thousands of export-oriented manufacturing industries in theprovince since the mid-19SOs, both labour-intensive (garments, shoes, textiles, furniture andelectronic assembly) and high technology oriented industries (motor vehicle, food, chemical,pharmaceuticals), economic growxth has been relatively rapid, averaging 7%-S% per annurm,equal to that of the country as wvhole. In line with its large population, West Java accounted

0[ .sr Jaa Jakarta Em l ro,u,,e noga/ Afanageru Project (If flEM lPj

\\est Ja%a Jakarta Enmironmental Nlanagement Project (NNJJENIP) Programniic Environniental Re%ieNs Page 4

for 16%zo of the country's GDP. Though its GDP per capita of S760 in 1994 was some 10%lower than the national average, its average household expenditure and wacre rate 'were both10% higher than the country average.

34. While maintaining adequate calorie and protein consumption, which are somewhathigher than the country average and 10% higher than elsewhere in Java, in the 1990-1993period, average household expenditures increased by 13% in real terms, in line with that ofthe country as whole. Real wage rates however increased faster by 37%, faster than thecountry as whole (25%) and other large Javanese provinces (17%-19%). As a result of thesetrends, poverty incidence, which was already lower than the country average, continued todecline in the early 1990s, and stood at 12.2% in 1993 (versus 13.2% for Indonesia)compared with 13.9% in 1990. This figure decreased further to 9.84% in Westem Indonesiain 1996 but following the monetarv crisis, the latest data suggests that the figure for urbanareas has now fallen back to 21.9% (1998 figure available at national level only).

35. Compared wVith higher average household incomes and lining standards, the people ofWest Java and DKI Jakarta are relatively better educated than those in other larger Javaneseprovinces. Around a quarter of the labour force was educated at junior school level aidabove, compared with just a fifth for Central and East Java. Similarly, illiteracy rates werecomparatively low at I11% versus 14% for Indonesia.

2.4 STRUCTURAL Clt-NGE

36. West Java has experienced massive structural changes in recent years. Though it remainsthe largest producer of paddy in the country, agriculture accounted for just 17% of theprovincial GDP in 1994, dowxn from 22% five years earlier. Because of the lower productivityof this sector compared wvith other sectors, agiculture continued to employ 37% of its labourforce in 1993. Nevertheless the share of agricultural labour force decline in mining, utilitiesand construction, accounted for 43% of GDP in 1994, just above the 40% share for thecountry as a whole. Sirmilarly, industrial employment accounted for over 21% of totalemployment compared with just 16% for Indonesia.

2.5 DISTRICT AND 'MUNICIPAL PROFILE

37. DKI Jakarta is administered through 5 separate urban districts and 43 subdistricts(kecamnatan) and 265 urban villages (kclhramhan. West Java is divided into 20 ruralkabzipaten and 5 urban kotatiadvca comprising around 1.5 million people on averageSubdistrict or kecatnatan normally contain 50,000-100,000 people each, averaging around 20subdistricts per rural district (range 10-40), and about 5 in urban districts, except for Bandungcity which comprises 26 keccunatan. The subdistricts, numbering 526 in total, are furtherdivided into villages of around 5,000 people on average, about 15 per kecaniatan on average,comprising some 7,125 illages in total. Some 400 of these are however "urban villages" orkeharahan which together combine to form the five largre towns (kotanfaadva) of Bogor,Sukabumi, Bandung. Cirebon and, more recently, Tangerang.

2.6 ENMIRONMENTAL CHAVNGE

3 S. As the economy has ffrowvn, the quality of the urban environmernt has declined. Thecontinued presence of solid, liquid and airbome pollutants causes ever-increasing stressresulting in Very critical problems \vith solid Nvaste management and air and water quality.As an indication of the magnitude of the problem, in DKI Jakarta alone, over 27,000 cubic

~i io Java Jakarta Emnropurnental Akaxigernen: Project (ItJJEAIP)

WN est Java Jak'rta Env iron rental Management Project (NVJJEMP) Prograimmic Env ironmental Rev iew Page 5

meters (i.e., about 6,000 tons) of domestic solid waste are produced per day, less than half ofwhich is collected and adequately disposed of. Surface waters throughout the region arecompromised by ever increasing pollution loads from both domestic and industrial sources;and air quality suffers from gro%x th of particulate and chemical loads contributed by wasteburming, vehicle and industrial emissions.

39. The concentration of population and industry * ith increased pollution runs counter to thepublic's demand for better urban living conditions. The Government is, therefore, seeking toimprove West Java-Jakarta environmental quality through a range of institutional, legal andtechnical interventions. The West Java-Jakarta Environmental Management Prorm(Program) has been designed to assist the Government to address its objectives by building acleaner, healthier and more attractive urban environment. Under a previous loan progrmJUDP 3, the World Bank identified Jabotabek's major urban environmental issues anddeveloped related action plans. The critical issues were found to be: (i) solid wastemanagement; (ii) water quality degradation; and (iii) air pollution. The proposed Programwvill build on these plans through environmental interventions impleniented at the mostappropriate level of govemment

3.0 Community Participation Aspects40. Consistent with recent Government policies, the project development methodology wasbased on a consultative "bottom up" prccess. To obtain input, the Project conductedinterviews with a wvide range of stakeholders drawn from Government at all levels, NGOs,the private sector, community groups, development institutions and universities. It isesomated that over 500 infomnation-gathering interviews were held. In addition to identifyingpriority environmental issues and relevant interventions, four special workshops were held,one each in Jabotabek, Bandung, Serang and Cirebon.

4 1. As discussed above, a previous World Bank project (LTDP-3) identified Jabotabek'smajor urban environmental issues. Building on this foundation, the Project conducted a seriesof interview's and workshops to further clarify local enVironmental concerns (see Table 3-1).Subprojects were then developed to address project area environmental issues.

Table 3-1: Summarv of Local Environmental Issues- Phase I Community Participation

L oa c t o IIssues ____I__

Se ra ng C I rebor Bandu n g o r T age rang Be kas . D K I j k t

oI id aste N N X X x X

rdr.s:elai 1 .asteo aer N X X X Y X X

Carnle s: ic S a s: e wate r Ni X .X

:oo C.onnuti A aren es s X X X

jark of M oritrorn r C on t r o X

'oar L3nd Use P r c c e Ni

i ° s ? i: I %V Was e C rt c. . . X

oastla Degradas ic t:'.: .1

A'ir .rr Qu- ' i X

o,x i^'h a:za r d oss BSNa Ctt X

Pcn r- t e r R e s rce P i a i n Ni n

nlea U p Ri er ' rains Ni X X

dke N an gemenX

ea N ai r Intrusion NI

,o n . k' '^ l,-' r .' r, ? n !'' ;5 ,nnri;rin itt .. '. s'' e'' nt .t F !a-1 r t Sihv

i esv Jaakcena XEevironmer7rjn Azggemeni Project (WIJEMP)

Notes X useI w her mentioned as an isue and a subp oject sugges:ed

\1 used isr mentioned as an ssue h,: nc sub robre s, ggested

West Java Jakarta Environmental MIanagrement Project (WNJJE.N1P) Prograninmic EnOironmental Re%siem Page 6

42. Certain issues, such as the need to reduce industrial wvastewater pollution and enhancesolid wvaste management systems and sernices, wvere common to all areas. Other issues, like

the need to handle domestic wastewater, lowv community axvareness and lack of monitoring.

cut across all West Java cities but wrere absent in Jabotabek. Jabotabek cits were most

interested in solid waste services and cleaningc up rivers and drains. Issues unique to each area

include:

* Serang - Poor Land Use Practices

* Cirebon - Hospital Waste Disposal and Coastal Degzradation

* Bandung - Toxic/Hazardous Waste Disposal aid or Water Resources Planning

* Tangerang - Coastal Degradation

* Bekasi - Poor Water Resources Planning, Lake Management and SeawaterIntrusion

43. Issues such as water resources planning, coastal degradation, saltwater intrusion anddrainage/sewerage wvere recommended by the Centrl Government to be addressed by otherexisting projects.

44. At the Program's four regional (i.e., Jabotabek, Bandung, Serang and Cirebon)

work-shops, a determination was made of the most important issues in each area andsubproject selection criteria were developed. Although each locality was encouraged toutilize their ovn unique selection criteria, ultimately the selection criteria used were similar.Typical selection criteria included: (i) extent of environmental improvement; (ii) beneficial

health impacts; (iii) consistent xvith present policies; (iv) ease of implementation /

sustainability; (v) potential for replication; (vi) community empowennent; and (vii)

financialaeconomic feasibility.

45. Utiliing the workshop issues and selection criteria, the Consultant ranked each of thegovemment subprojects. Based on the ranking and categorization, the governmentsubprojects Nvere packaged into both a development time frame and strategic sectorrepresented by components. The local govemment's suggested timing for subproject

implementation differs from the Consultant's recommendations. Typically, the localgovernments accelerate the subproject timetables. The Consultant sought guidance from GOIon this issue and Nwas advised to use the local govemment's timing for use in the project costand disbursement tables. This decision was tak-en to: (i) allow for the earlier availability offunds if needed; and (ii) encourage fast action by local governments. Howe-ver, recentexperience has showvn that be process of turning a basic concept into a temis of reference for

implementation is slow as the local governments generally do not have a full understandingof wvhat they actually want to do. As a result, for most local goverm-nents, only one first yearsubproject has been defined for loan appraisal.

4.0 Adaptable Program Loan and Environmental Management

46. The GOI has espressed interest in applying for an Adaptable Program Loan (APL) insupport of the WJJENIP. APLs are a sequence of projects supported bv separde loans, to

support phased implementation of long-tern development programs wvhen there is cleara(reement on objectives, but where the path to achieve them requires leaming from results.

If.st in a Jakjria Em'iromre,tzal ._ faugernten Project (If'JJEMIP)

\est JaNa Jakarta En ironnental lanagermwnt Project (NVJJE.NIP) Programniicn Environmental Rex ieiw Page 7

APLs allow a better response for certain development problems and I6m the GOI's point ofview, stand for (i) continuity for long-term development, particularly for environmentalmanagement activities; (ii) allow for a demand-driven expansion of the APL as changes inscope are identfied during project implementation; aid (iii) allow for more flexible andtimely responses to changing needs'. For WJJEMP, this requires that an environmentalmanag,ement framework be developed based on a number of stages prior to projectimplementation.

47. The implementation of WJJEMNP is proposal as a 9 year program and it is planned tooccur over three phases: (i) Initiation Phase i'APL 1/Years 43); (ii) Acceleration Phase (APL2L'Years 4-6); and (iii) Institutionalization Phase (APL 3/Years 7-10). The main objective ofAPL I is to establish the framework for environmental interventions and specializedprograms in environmental education, small/medium scale industries and communityenironment. The objective of APL 2 is improvement in environmental quality ihmughimplementation of directed investments and softvare interventions. The objective of APL 3 isto continue the program of environmental improvements through new interventionsdeveloped as WJJEvIP evolves. Benchmarki indicators and implementation arrangementsproposed for APL 1,2 and 3 are dscussed below.

2 WNor!d Bank .f 7-ai arc Adaptable Programt Loans?

ia Ja1 Jakarta Emnvirotental . kogemeta I Project (fiWJJELP

West Java Jakarta Env iron mental Management Project (WJJE-NIP) Programmic EnNironmental ReNieNs Page 8

4.1 PROJECT INITIATION PHASE (APL 1)

48. As stated, the overall development objective of WJJENIP is to establish a framework toimprove environmental quality, human health and economic productiVity in the urban areasof West Java and Jakarta through pollution reduction. Secondary objectives are povertyalleviation, employment generation and industrial efficiency.

49. During the iniitiation phase under APL 1, the Program, aims to improve overall municipalservices delivery. This is accomplished through:

a) Strengthening community participation.b) Increasing private sector involvement,c) Improving local government finances,d) Bettering local government management and governance capacity; and,e) Improving coordination between district, city, provincial and central government

agencies.

50. The program utilizes initiatives in (i) project support; (ii) solid waste planning andmanagement; (iii) small/medium scale industry pollution reduction, (iv) environmnentaleducation and awareness; (v) a community environment faciliy (CEF) to fund localimprovements; and (vi) environmental management and strategv development. The solidwaste component contains: (i) formation and initial operations of the Jabotabek WasteManagement Corporation; (ii) waste reduction and recycling Xvith a special emphasis oncomposting; (iii) improvement of solid waste collection and disposal systems; and (iv)development and implementation of improved medical wvaste treatment systems. Thesmall/medium scale industry support component seeks to reduce, pre ent, control and treatpollution from small and medium scale industries. It extends technical information toindustry associations and provides a credit facility to implement recommendations. Theenvironmental education program uses both formal education and public awarenesscomponents to build more environmentally responsible public attitudes. The main purpose ofthe CEF is the establishment of a funding mechanism to assist communities in theimprovement of local environmental and sanitation conditions.

51. In order to strengthen the environmental management aspects of WVJJEMP, achievablemilestones should be met before moving on to APL 2. It is recommended that measurabletrigger points for proceeding to APL 2 be based on the followv ing conditions:

* Jabotabek Waste Management Corporation established (operationsfunded by project);

* Greater Bandung Waste Management Corporation established(operations funded by project);

* Waste Management Master Plans updated for both Jabotabek andBandung,:

* Environmental awareness, as monitored and ranked annually by anindependent observer, increased by 10%/o (estimated amount to beconfirmed after Year I wvhen baseline levels are knonwn and themeasunrng program established);

* Publicly vetted AMTDALs (consistent with GOI and World Bank}environmental assessment requirements) and clear operating planse.xist for all operating and proposed TPAs;

11 est Jaw a JaLn- EDivroninenial Auazagenrtew Payoer (4I iJEA Il)

WVest Java Jakarta En ironmerital Managemnent Project (WNJJE.MIP'I Programnuic EnrwIronmentail ReN iew Page 9

. Hospital waste study completed and proposed facilities designed,reviewed, and found consistent wvith GOI and W"orld Bankrequirements;

* Serang enviuonnntal management stateev completed;

* Ratio of grants/counterpart funds/ step loans (SLAs) defined andagreed to by all levels of government;

* Pemda solid waste revenues increased by 20% from tipping and privatewaste hauler license fees (estimated amount to be confirmed after YearI when baseline levels known and the measuring program established);

* Public Advisory Boards established for all TPAs (funded by projectgrants to Pemda's);

* Preparation of annual "State of the Environment" (NKLD) reports byeach Penda and the Province of West Java (funded by the project asgrants from Pusat); and,

* At least one wastewater treatment plant in DKI Jakarta and tvo inWest Java operating *vithin BAPEDAL standards; and

* Publicly vetted and agreed to action plan (with deadlires) for phasingout lead in fuel.

52. Annex A includes a checklist for the evaluation of fulfillment of conditions in order toproceed to APL 2.

4.2 ACCELERATION PHASE (APL 2)

53. The objective under APL 2 is to consolidate systems to improve overall municipalservices delivery in the urban areas of W'est Java and Jakarta through pollution reductionwhile continuing efforts at poverty alleviation, employment generation and industrialefficiency.

54. The Project builds on APL I activities and seeks to further strengthen eff(ts to: (i)overcome problems experienced Nvith solid wvaste collection and disposal; (ii) provideeffective focus on solid w aste services delivery planning and management; (iii) based onlessons leamed under APL 1, further develop composting and recycling programs; (iv)continue to enhance the role of civil society and public involvement in the urban environmentsector; (v) extend the reach of programs to reduce, prevent, control and treat pollution fromsmall/medium scale industries; (vi) expand the number of students, and the public at large,involved in education and awareness prograrns; and (vi) increase the number of loans andgrants provided under the CEF.

5 5. With the implementation of directed investments achieved under APL 2, there are anumber of conditions required in order to proceed to APL 3 which include:

* Jabotabek Waste Management Corporation operating and funded byPemda's;

* Environmental awareness, as monitored and ranked annually by anindependent observer, increased by '20% (estimated amount to be

Is iest Java Jakarta Emironniewrai Atfwzgernenz Projec (4i JJEMIP)

N\met JaN a Jakarta Ens ironienitalI Mlanagenment Project (XX JJEMIP) Programmic En vironmental Re iew Pagre I0

confirmed after Year I when baseline levels are known and themeasuring program established);

* Operations of hospital waste facilities funded significantly by Pemda's(or direct cost recovery from hospitals);

* At least one wvastewvater treatment plant in DKI Jakarta and two inWest Java operating within BAPEDAL standards;

* Pemda solid waste revenues increased by 60% from tipping and privatewaste hauler license fees (estimated amount to be confirmed after Year1 when baseline levels known and measuring programestablished);and,

* Preparation of annual "State of the Environment" (NKLD) reports byeach Pemda and funded by the respective Pemda.

4.3 INSTITUTIONALIZATION PHASE (APL 3)

56. The objective of APL 3 is to institutionalize the environmental initiatives introduced inthe urban areas of West Java and Jakarta under APL I and 2 through new interventionsdeveloped as WJEMIP evolves.

57. APL 3 seeks to: (i) expand and ensure sustainability of the environmental management,solid waste, small/medium scale industry, educatiorVavareness and CEF programs developedunder APL 1 and 2; and (ii) continue to strengthen the role of civil society and public

involvement in the urban environment sector. This will be achieved through the followingend-of-program indicators:

. Jabotabek and Bandung7 WNaste Management Corporations wellestablished and sustainably operated and funded by Pemda's;

* Environmental awareness, as monitored and ranked annually by anindependent observer, increased by 40% (estimated amount to- beconfirmed afler Year I when baseline levels are known and themeasuring program established);

* Operations of all project area hospital waste facilitles meet World

Bank- and GOI standards and are funded prirmarily by Pemda's (ordirect cost recovery from hospitals);

. Pemda solid waste revenues increased by 80% from tipping and privatewaste hauler license fees (estimated amount to be confirmed after YearI when baseline levels are known and the measuring program

established);

* PubliclxX vetted AMDALs (consistent wvith GOI and WN'orld Bankenvironmental assessment requirements) and clear operating plans arerequired for all new TPAs;

* At least two wastewater treatnmen, plants in DKI Jakarta and four inWest Java operatinCg witlhin Bapedal standards;

* Action plan for phasing out lead in fuel 50Q0 comrete;

I fsi a Jarkarra E,nziromzne,rtal A!aizagerme,u Project (IfUJJEA[IPi

,est Jama Jakart En%ironniental Managenent Project (NNJJE\IP) Programrnsic Environmental Rev ieNv Page 11

Initial environmental education teacher traming complete;

* Significant environmental and poverty alleviation impact of the CEF;and,

* Effective assistance to a large number of small and mediLmn sizedindustries alloNving for a majorreduction in water bome pollution

5.0 Program ComponentsThe Logical Framework Analysis (LFA) conducted during the third phase of programplanning grouped the subprojects into six major components:

* Project Support through Technical Assistance (TA);

* Solid Waste Management;

* Srnafl/Medium Scale Industry Support;

* Environmental Education and Awareness;

* Commnunity Environment Facility (CEF); and,

* Environmental Management.

5S. The LFA grouping also revealed that of the 130 subprojects, of those remaining afterexclusion of non-qualifying cnes, approximately 30 were community and 20 small-scaleindustry subprojects. Improvements for both communities and smallscale industries are willbe addressed through private sector initiatives using a financial intemnediarv onlendingstructure. The rermining 80 long listed subprojects in the areas of project support, solidwaste, environmental education and awareness and environmental management have beenproposed to be imrplemented by GOI. About 30 of these subprojects could be consolidated,resulting ii a final list of about 50 recommended GOI sponsored subprojects.

59. Each of these components is now described in more detail.

5.1 COMPONENTI - PROJECT SUPPORT

60. This component includes a Central Project Management Unit (CPNIU) to be headed bythe D.G. Urban Devebpment as the main unit responsible for project management andcoordination. There are subcomponents which include a public information campaign aboutthe project and environrmental training. There would be a team of domestic and internationalconsultants providing Technical Assistance to the Project vxith Specialists recommended inthe following fields:

* Urban Environmental Management

* Govemrance,Procurement

* Environmental Planning

* Enviroumental Economics

* TrinUingF

Environmcntal Managcment includes subprojccts in integrated domestic/industrial wastewater treatment, airquality, domestic sanitation coupled wvith river wvater protecton, inter regional river basin planning andirceninz.

;Vest Jcna jao-ana Emrronmenlal Management Project (If-JJEMIP)

'Xest Ja%a Jakalta Environniental MIanagemenit Project (\VJJE-IP) Programnmic Enxiron[iental Re ieos Page I'

• Public Awareness

* Sanitary Engineers (solid waste arid wastewvater)

* Urban WVaste Management

* Business Planning

* Hospital Waste Management

* Solid Waste Transportation

* Solid Waste Reduction

• Operating and Maintenance

* Municipal Finance

* Program Related Support (Education, Cleaner Production, CEF)

* Project Benefit Monitoring and Evaluation (PBME)

61. Through the Program, it is proposed that a fomial environrnental strategy be developedfor each municipality/district To emphasize the importance of this strategy to the overailspatial planning effort, it has been propcsed that all Program area municipalities'districts berequired to have the strategy in place by the end of APL 1. Those failing to do so would notbe eligible to receive support from the Program in APL 2 and 3 while those wvith welldeveloped strategies can use them to guide the support they receive during the remaining tvoProgarm APLs.

62. The intemational and domestic Environmnental Planners in the CPMU wvould assist eachof the municipalities/districts to develop their strategies and spatial plans. In additict,flexibility exists in design of the training courses. If uvarranted, a special course in theenvironmental aspects of spatial planning can be provided to staff from the municipalities anddistricts. Also included under the Program are discussion forums funded through workshopsconducted under the CPMU. Funding is provided for three forums to tak-e 'place in eachmunicipality,'district during the first eighteen months of APL I to ptomote communityparticipation during spatial planningC

5.2 CONI PONENT 2 - SOLID WVASTE

63. The overall objective of the solid *waste component is to increase the efficiency andenvironmental acceptability of solid waste collection and disposal, including a reduction inthe volume of waste being disposed of in the Program area. There are four sub-componentscomprising: (i) formation of two regional waste management corporations, and constructionof new transfer stations and landfills in Jabotabek and Bandung; (ii) support to subprojects inwxaste reduction (i.e., composting), recycling, and scavmnger livelihood improvement (iii)support to municipalities in West Java to improve their solid waste collection and disposalservices; and (iv) undertaking a study folloNved by the implemnentationi of a medical wastemanagement program.

64. The objective of subcomponent (ii) is to reduce the volume of wnaste being disposed atlandfills. Biomass reduction may be accomplished through:

* Compost Technology Development;

* A Compost Marketing Study; and

11 es: la aJalarta Ern!ro-new,,:A1 ogmew Project (1I JJEAlP)

\Vest Java Jakarta Environmental Management Project(NNJJENtP) Programnimic Environmental ReNiew^ Page 13

* Establishment of Compost Facilities.

65. The objective is to establish a seri,es of public/private compost operations withprofessional management and the required intemal quality controls to insure that the productmeets the requirement of the market(s) identified through the marketing study. CommLnitybased facilities are also developed and may later be linked to these commercial enterprises.

66. Compost facilities will be a combination of large (i.e., greater than 30 tons per day(TPD)) operations coupled with small-scale TPD operations. The focus of small-scaleoperations will be on neighborhood level operations where land is available and there isgeneral support at the community level for such operations. Larger facilities will have anaverage investment of Rp. 26 billion with a land requirement of approximately 6.5 hectarswith professional management and marketing support.

67. There are advantages and disadvantages to both small and larger scale operations. Larger-operations will be established as professionally run businesses backed by continuedtechnological and marketing support from the Jabotabek Waste Management Corporation.The small operations are important within a community development framework and Will befinanced on a project by project basis through the CEF component.

68. A subproject in the improvement in the lihelihood of scavengers was also recommended.The objective is to increase the income of the already wellorganized scavenger communityby increasing their activities beyond the separation of saleable wastes to include thecollection and separation of organic material suitable for the production of high qualitycompost. Also a subproject is focused on venniculture for the production of high qualitycompost aimed at specialized markets for producing ornamental plants, fish food andmedicine.

Sub-component (iii) - Solid Waste Management in WVest Java

69. The objective of this subcomponent is to support the improvement of solid wastecollection and disposal services in West Java, WA`here relevant the solid. waste actiNities inWest Java will follow the protocols develcped by the Agency. Examples include procedures-for landfill operations, composting and recyclincg.

70. The Program wVill provide support to the development of newN TPAs and other solid xastemanagement activities through subprojects in Cirebon, Cilegon (Kabupatmn Serang) andBandung.

71. This component will also provide TA to Bandung Kotamadya and Kabupaten toestablish a Solid Waste Management Corporation responsible for providing solid wvastecollection and disposal services throughout the Greater Bandung metropolitn area.

Sub-component (iv) - Medical NVaste Treatment

72. The objective of this sub-component is to undertake a study of the most technologticallyand economically suitable approach for dealing vith non-liquid hospital wastes. The study

'il be conducted throL h the Jabotabek Solid Waste Management Corporation, howvever, thestudy will cover the entire Program areas. Specific subproject proposals for the constructionof medical waste treatment facilities wVill be delayed until the study has been completed. Inmost cases, this "ill result in implementation during APL 2.

est Java Jakarta EDnmrotmienrua .tkvkagemert Projecz (IVJJEA!P)

\ est Java Jakart Environmental Management Project (WVJJLNIP) Progranmlic Env ironmental Re%iew Page 14

'.3 COMPONENT 3 - S.ALIAIEDIUM SCALE INDUSTRY SUPPORT

73. The small/medium scale industry support component seeks to reduce, prevent, controland treat pollution from Program area small and medium scale industries in anenvironmentally sustainable, economically justifiable and financially viable manner.Pollution reduction may be through introduction of: (i) better house keeping practices; (ii)new products from the waste stream; (iii) recycling altematixes; and/or (iv) treatment options.Secondary objectives are to promote industry efficiency, poverty alleviation and employmentgeneration.

74. Selection of target industries was based on high stakeholder interest, pollution loads,toxicity, strong industry associations and the potential for profit generation. Target industriesare:

* Tofu Production

* Batik- Manufacture

* Electroplating

75. The Ministry of Trade and Industry's Department of Industry (MTITDI) is provided withtechnical assistance with a pollution control planning team working with MTU-DI staff andlocal govemment to develop and introduce policies, prograrns and strategies to reducesmalL/medium scale industry pollution especially at the municipaL/district level. Also MTIDIxwill use technical assistance units (TAUs) wvhich will wvork together with the respective targetindustry associations and others (e.g. kelurahan industry peer groups) in the development ofpollution reduction programs. In some cases, applied research and development (R&D)would be carmied out R&D could include, but not be lirmited to, pilot plant development, testmarketing, consumer and producer surveys or even grants to innovative small industries. Inaddition to technology development, the TAU wvill assist in the preparation of creditapplications for bankable proposals. Credit applications are not limited to those industrieswith TAUs. Credit applications, subject to specific criteria, can also be -accepted from anyproject area smatLrmedium scale industry for pollution reduction. The component is designed-such that it can accomrruodate new efforts in areas such as recycling and reuse.

76. Interest rates will be set at the Bank Indonesia certificate rate (SBI) which is slightlybelow commercial market lending rates. The lesser rate is justifed since all of the pollutionreduction loans contain a significant element of non-market economic benefit. Borrowers willbe required to contribute a minimum of 15 percent of the subproject cost. The loan terms andgmce period will be tailored to generally reflect the borrowers anticipated cash flow.Howvever, a maximum loan term of seven years and grace period of two years wNill be applied.A maximum loan amount of Rp. 2 billion is also set. Collateral is required for loans.

77. The credit applications will be forwarded to a domestic, private Channeling Bank. TheChanneling Bank will send the technical section of the credit application to BAPEDAL fortheir review and approval. B.APEDAL has functioned effectively in this role under theOECF's PAE and KM' pro( grams. BAPEDAL wsill also receive the sernices of monitoringspecialists and a legal expert. The legal expert will makle recommendations on improving aridconsolidating the legislation and regulations effecting small/medium scale industry pollutionmonitoring ard enforcement.

;I&s: Jmaa Jakjria Emn romunenial t I2angzeneF Pro)ecr (iJJE,'

\Vest Java Jakar' Environnicntal M lanagement Project (WXJJENIP) Programiniic Environmental Review Page I 5

78. BAPEDALDA. provincial level in DKI Jakarta and municipaLtdistrict level in WNest Java,Mill be strengthened by the project. They will receive assistance in development ofsmall/medium scale industrn pollution reduction programs and improve their monitonnngcapacity through the proVision of services and finds for equipment purchase and operations.

79. Once a credit application is approved by BAPEDAL, the Channeling Bank will requestBAPEDALDA provincial level in DKI Jak-arta or municipal/district level in West Java todesign an environmental monitorui- program for the proposed subloan. The monitoringTprogram will be included in the credit application and must be agreed upon by the bank, thesub-borrower and BAPEDALDA. Failure to comply with the monitoring program willconstitute a breach of the credit agreement. Incorporation of BAPEDALDA into the creditprocess wvill assist in enhancing their environmental monitoring role.

5.4 COMNIPONENT 4-INA'VIRONEN-TAL EDUCATION AND AwARENESS

80. The Program seeks to inprove the prograam area urban environment through a range ofinterventions. However, to be fully sustainable these, and other interventions, need to besupported by the population at large. This will require an improvement in public attitudestowards the environment. The most effective rmeans of attaining such behaVioral change is byeducating people about the need for a cleaner environment The Environmental Educationand Awareness component aims to achieve lon-temn positive behavioral change byeducating the public about the importance of environmental responsibility through bothformal education and public awareness.

81. The public awareness subcomponent has three portions: (i) environmental newspaperproduction and dissemination; (ii) competitions; and (iii) public campaigns. MIOEC willproduce an environmental education newspaper. The newspaper wVill be published monthlyWith content that provides a sound, general overview of environmental issues in Indonesia.

82. Four different types of enVironment-related competitions are en'visaged. Thecompetitions will be held annually and are targeted at students and teachers. Competitions areto be in drawing for elementary students, writing for junior secondary students, and scientificessay writing, and possibly science fars, for senior secondary students. There wvill also be-scientific writing contests for teachers. To promote practical application of environmentalskills, a competition wvill be held betwveen schools. The schools found to have the most"environmentally ffiendlv' grounds and buildings and the best environmental understandinwill be the victors. Campaigns directed at the general public Will be conducted through a

eanety of mediums including leaflets'stickers, posters, print and electronic media.

5.* COMPONENT 5 - COMMUN Y EN+,IWRONMENT FACILITY

83. The main purpose of the Community Environment Facility (CEF) is the establishment ofa fundingc mechanism to help communities, businesses and groups of individuals improvelocal environmental and sanitation conditions. Although the CEF is targeted at environmentaland sanitation improvements, which should result in better health for the public, it has asecondar, purpose - to promote local economic development and raise incomes. Furtherdevelopment of CEF will occur dungn2 APL I with implementation in APL 2 and 3.Flowever, the Consultant has prepared an initial proposal the essence of which is describedbelow,'.

84. The scope of the CEF includes:

iiesr Jcna Jakaria Eirn,-ounem'a/ Ai v rgement Prowec! i JYJEAf!P'

West Java JakartA Ens ironniental Management Project (WN JJEMNP) Prograrnmic En% irotinmental Rev icy, Page 16

* Improvements to public health by providing a means whereby aconmunity or groups of individuals can carry out improvements toenvironmental and sanitation conditions at the local level; and,

. Creation of entrepreneurial opportunities through environmentalsubprojects that result in income generation and better living standards.

85. There are three categories of subprojects that can be considered for inclusion in the CEFprogram: (i) general community environmental projects; (ii) support to a specific industry orcommercial activity; and (iii) support to groups of households. The Program recommencd amethod for subproject segregation by category as well as a system for mnking and evaluationof subprojects.

86. The CEF %vill be implemented through three levels of govemrnment; central,municipalldistrict and community (i.e., k}elurahan). The key agencies and their -responsibilities are show n in Figure > 1.

I'esl Jaa JvJcrkara Ein:rontnental AI.\ ettnerj Pro)ecr (;U JJEAIP

UVest Ja%a JakArta Ensironmental MIanagement Project (NWJJEMIP) Prograninmic Ensironmental Reviews Page 17

Figure 5-1: CEF Implementation Organization

-D C p Responsibilities-

C E F C o d i aor | u p e ere l p e nao

age c 5

- Prepare and man ae

A g e n Cs . i n fors a t I on ca paign

C a o r d i n a-t o A I i t i o n of f u ds

P a P g p ro Responsibilities;-

A p ptppronal of s obpro ject

n o one piLn

| Tech n ical | Su bpro ent approna

A 3 e n c I e 5 . ~~~~~~~~F in a 1lc i a I nnanag e me n

Lia sion a nd noord inaion

| L h MR D | Resp.nsibilities:

E n d or s e c on .c e pt

Responsibilities: Leo - Laa I ba n ag e m e n t

- Inforn aijon . NCOs i c a m, meu, It y g r o.u p s

d I semina I on

, P r ees b p tojecms C 0 %t L U N I T Y

o L K %l D

87. The CEF program Will be managed by the Directorate General of the Development ofVillage Inhabitants (PMD) in the Ministry of Home Affairs. There 'will be a full time CEFCoordinator established within PMD. The implementing agency Nvill be the PMD at themunicipal'district level. There will be a full time CEF Pirnbagpro in that office assigned forthe CEF progrram. TTe Pimbagpro will be responsible for the final approval of subprojects. Itis this aspect that defines the real "power to the local government" and provides thePimbagpro with a major responsibility at the local level. It is not intended that approval foreach subproject be confirmed by the regent (i.e., Bupati) or mayor (i.e., Walikotamadya).

88. There wVill be technical teams established to assist the Pimbagpro and the CEF programgoenerally. The technical teams will be chosen from municipalUdistrict agencies wvih themakeup dependant upon the nature of the subprojects. The technical agencies will becoordinated throuch BAPPEDA municipalitv/district. A Handling Bank Will be appointed toadminister the loan process. Following approval by PMID municipal/district, sibprojectproposals eliDable for loan financing will be forwvarded to the Handling Bank for financialadministration. A financial management unit will be set up to assist the Pimbagpro and theHandling Bank uvith the financial and economiic assessments of theproposed subprojects.

89. The component requires an estimated 40 Extension Agents be appointed on a part timebasis for each municipality/district and be stationed in the municipaL/district PMD office. Therole of the extension agent is to provide independent support to a number of the activities,includin-:

II est Java Jakazra Emsiropunenetcl ,anagensemn Protect (% JJEfPj

1W est Jas a Jakarta En ironnienta]l Managentent Project (WNJJENIP) Progranonaic Environmental Re ie\> Page IS

* Dissemination of CEF information;

* .Assist and provide advice and g-uidance to communities duringsubproject proposal and approval; and,

* Report to the CEF Coordinator regarding the arrangements forbeneficiary selection and monitoring of subproject results.

90. The Extension Agents will be responsible for preparin, and holding informationmeetings wVith community heads (i.e., Lurah, RT and RW) as well as other officials fromgovernment agencies, NGOs and prnvate chizens involved in local community developmentThe Extension Agent will be the main liaison link' bet ween the CEF Coordinator, thePimbacpro, municipality/district and the community regarding the information campaign.He/she will report to the CEF Coordinator. Submnission of subproject proposals will bethrough the LKMD/Community based organization. However, it will be the Extension_Agent's responsibility to meet with the LKMD/Local Equivalent after submission ofsubprojects to insure that a "genuine communliy or individual effort has developed thesubprojects, not the influence of the village heads or other interested parties".

91. The Extension Agents are to be recruited and supervised through a separate contract witheither an NGO, university or private company. The contractor would in turn enter intosubcontracts wvith local comnunity based organizations or NGO's to supply one or moreExtension Agents. This Vill assist in strengthening the NGO community and contribute to thesustainability of the CEF following project completion. The CEF is set up as a sustainablefacility. The initial CEF funding is Rp. 120 billion. The cumulative total of CEF loan requestsreceived is projected to increase from 1015 pilot projects during APL I to approximtely 350in APL 3). An estimated 50 percent of requests wvill be approved and funded. Selectedsubprojects will range in size and possible impacts w ill need to be assessed.

-5.6 COMPONENT 6 -FXAIRONAIENTAL MA.NAGEMENNT

92. The Environmental Management component is comprised of subprgcects wvhich serve asirmportant models for expansion and address major issues, but were not considered suitablefor inclusion into other components. As a result, Emironmental Management consists of a-series of subprojects, rather than a detailed sector specific component. Subprojects areincluded for: (i) integrated domestic/industrial wastewater treatment; (ii) air quality; (iii)domestic sanitation coupled wvith river water protection; (iv) inter-regional river basinplanngi; and (v) greening. All of thes subprojects are pilot efforts which could be appliedwidely throughout Indonesia.

93. Tiree subprojects have been identified under this component for first yearimplementation. These subprojects are: (i) Wastewater Treatment Facility for JakartaIndustrial Estate Pulo_adung (integrated domestic/industrial wastewater treatment); (ii) andair quality technical assistance project for Jakarta and Bandung): and (iii) EnvironmentalPermniting for Cik-apundung River Domestic Sanitation (domestic sanitation coupled withflyer \vater protection). Later year subprojects include implementation of the CikapundungRiver Domestic Sanitation subproject and Cilixvung River Basin Integrated Planning forwhich a previous report has been prepared entitled Recommen7dations for Prokasih Progranm,C(ikcaundlung River, Banciurg and Ciliw,un g River, .Jakarta'Bogor. Other subprojects includeurban areening for Cirebon (municipality and district), Bandung (municipality), Tangerang(municipality and district) and Bekasi (municipality).

W'ert oin u jarta E;ntro,ureruj ,i fuluagernienzz Project (if'JJE.1IP)

\Nest Jav a JakArta Environrnental Managenment Project (W\JJEN IP) Progranimiic Environmental Rev iew Page 19

6.0 Environmental Screening

94. Environmental screening of the Prorani components and subprojects Xwas required tosatisfy both World Bank- and GOI environmental procedures.

6.1 OPERATIONAL POLICY 4.01

95. The Operational Policy 4.01 (OP 4.01) of the Bank recommends environmentalscreening of each proposed subproject to detemuine the appropriate extent and type of EArequired. The Bank- classifies a proposed project into one of four categories, depending on thetype, location, sensitivity, and scale of the project and the nature and magnitude of itspotential environmental impacts. In this case there is considerable variety in the range ofactiVities, works and programs proposed.

96. The four categories are:

(a) Categor A.4: A proposed project is classified as 'Category A' if it is liklely to havesimificant adverse environmental impacts that are sensitive, diverse, or unprecedented.These impacts may affect an area broader than the sites or facilities subject to physicalworks. EA for a Category A project examines the projects potential negetive and positiveenvironmental impacts, compares them vith those of feasible altematives (including the'%vithout project" situation), and reconumends any measures needed to prevent, miniiize,mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts and improve enNirormental performance.

(bh Categoiy B: A proposed project is classified as 'Category B' if its potential adverseenvironmental impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas -including wetlands, forests, grasslands and other natural habitats - are less adverse thanthose of Category A projects. These impacts are site-specific; feNv if any of them areirreversible; and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than forCategory A projects. The scope of EA for a Category B project may vary from project toproject, but it is narrower than for a Category A project.

(c) Cateorv C: A proposed project is classified as 'Category C' if it is likely to have-minimal or no adverse environmental impact. Beyond screening no further EA acion isrequired for a Category C project.

0) Category FI A proposed project is classified as 'Category Fl' if it is involvesinvestment of Bank funds throuugh a financial intemiediary, in subprojects that may resultin adverse environmental impacts.

97. For a financial intermediary (FI) operation, the Bank requires that each Fl screenproposed subprojects and ensure that sub-borrowers carry out appropriate EA for eachsubproject. Before approving a subproject, the Fl verifies (through its ovn staff, outsidecxperts, or existing environmental institutions) that the subpro'ect meets the enNironmentalrequirements of appropriate national and local authonties and is consistent xvith operationalprocedures and other applicable environmental policies of the Bank.

98. In appraising a proposed Fl operation, the Bank- should review the adequacy of countryenvironrmental requirements relevant to the project and the proposed EA arrangements forsubprojects, including the mechanisms and responsibilities for environmental screening, andreview of EA results. WNhen necessary, the Bank ensures that the project includes components

I e!s JauJakai, arEmrornngnial tfarage;neC,? Project 11 JJEMtIP)

WNest Jas3 Jakaru Environmental Management Project (NVJJE.MP) Programmlic En%ironmental Re-ieNs Page 20

to strengthen such EA arrangements. For Fl operations expected to have Category Asubprojects, prior to the Bank's appraisal each identified participating Fl provides to the Banka written assessment of the institutional mechanisms (including, as necessary, identificationof measures to strengthen capacity) for its subproject EA work If the Bank- is not satisfiedthat adequate capacity exists for carrying out EA, all Category A subprojects and, asappropriate, Category B subprojects--including EA reports--are subject to prior review andapproval by the Bank.

6.2 GOI AMDAL PROCEDURES

99. GOI procedures employ quantitative criteria related to the surrounding environment of aproject in order to establish the required degree of environmental assessment. There are threelevels of assessment:

* Full ANDAL equivalent to fill project specific environmentalassessment;

* IKL'JPL A more limited assessment using standardizedenvironmental management and monitoring plans (referred to as upayaor effort); and,

. SOP Standard Operating Procedures For Inclusion in Contractdocumnentation, which sets out contractor's responsibilities in theconduct of the works.

6.3 GOI ScREENLNG CRrrERLA

100.Screering criteria is outlined in Decree No. KEP-39/MIvENLIAi8/1996 of the Minister ofState for the Environment. The, types of projects in the Public Works (PU) sector that mayrequire an ANDAL are:

- Construction and rehabilitation of darns and embank-nents;- Irrigation area development;- Tidal swamp area development;- Coastal protection in large cities;- River improvement works in large cities;- Canalization / flood control facilities in large cities;- Canalization (coastal areas, swaps, etc.);- Construction of toll roads and flyovers;- Highway construction;- Arterial and collector roads, construction and upgrading;- Bridges in metropolitan areas and in large and small cities;- Garbage disposal. using incineration;- Garbage disposal, using controlled landfill or sanitary landfill systerns;- Garbage disposal using open dumping systems:- Drainage systems using canals in large cities ad metropolitan areas;- Construction of sewerage systems and wvaste water treatment facilities in

urban areas;- System for wvithdraxwal of water from lakes, rivers, springs or other water

sources;- Public housing and settlement construction- Urban renewval projects; and,- Construction of multistory and apartment buildings.

tKsz Ja&ra Jalarta Emrvzrornnental .tka kgeinen Project (WLJJEMP'y

VN est JaN a Jaka EnNironrmental M anagement Project (WNJJE.NIP) Progranmmic Ensironmental Review Page 21

10 1. Apart from tle types of projects as listed above, projects situated in or bordering on oneof the followsing protected areas pursuant to Decree no. KEP-39,tMENLH'S!/I996 require afill AMDAL:

- Forest protection area;- Peat area;- Water catchment area;- Coastal edges;- River edges;- Areas surrounding lakes and reservoirs;- Nature conservation area (including nature reserves, wildlife reserves,

tourism forests, genetic protection areas and wildlife refuges);

- Marine and freshwater conservation areas (including manne waters,fresh water bodies, coastal areas, estuaries, coral reefs and atolls whichhave special features such as high diversity or a unique ecosystem);

- Coastal mangrove areas;- National parks;- Recreation parks;- Nature parks;- Cultural reserve and scientific research areas (including karst areas,

areas with special cultural features, archaeological sites or sites withgigh historical value); and,

Areas susceptible to natural hazards.

102. Types of projects not listed are required to implement UKL'UPL. UKLJUPL are freestanding and tend to be site specific. There provisionis may be inserted in contracts but canalso become parts of operating plans, or the UKIJLUPL can be used in conjunction withoperating plans. These documerts are generally standardized. Care should be taken to ensurethat they are prepared so they can be useful for site-specific application. The Bank should -require a site-specific EMP if there is any doubt concering the ability of the UKLIUPL tofulfill the intent of the OP4.0 I requirements.

7.0 Potential Environmental Impacts

103. The above descriptions of the six components demonstrate that the proposed project doesraise issues relevant to the environmental assessment (EA) operational policies of the WorldBank- or the GOI AMDAL process.

104. Nany of the initiatives particularly in the first twvo years (APL I) of the project involvethe design and planning of technical assistance and raising environmental and healthawareness through broadly based public information campaigns and district specific spatialplanning initiatives. These initiatives would be screened as Category C activities under theBank- procedures and wvould not qualify' for screening under the GOI ANMDAL procedures.

105. However, there are individual subproject wvithin four of the cbmponents that areconsidered to require further discussion and screening. As APL 2 activities commence, it isexpected that there Will be subprojects implemented that require environrnental review under

I; est Jva JaJ2art mEtrironvnens:a Management Project (4IIJEAIP)

WN est Java Jakara Environmnental Management Proje ('NVJJE.M[P) Prugraminiac Enviroi ntental Re% iewN Page 22

the World Bank- or GOI AMIDAL prccess. For instance the construction of solid wastedisosal facilities of the size and ty,pe likely to be supported by WJJEiP Nwould be classifiedas Category B.

106. Each of the four components that raise screening issues is discussed separately.

7.1 COMPONENT 2 - SOLID WASTE SUBCOMPONENTS INA, OLVING THE CONSTRUCTION,OPERATION AND REHABILITATION OF FLNAL DISPOSAL SITES (TPA'S)

107. The potential impacts of these actiVities are well documented and include:

• Irnpacts on ground water and surface wvater which are potentially themost adverse environmental impact, as a result of movement ofleachate offsite;

* Impacts on adjoining neighbors from poor operational practice relatingto odor and air quality and noise generated by truckl movements. Thelandfill operation can also significantly change vehicular trafficimpacts on the areas along the access route; and,

* Potential lirmits to the use of surrounding land due to the perception ofthe public about living in close proximity to a landfill.

108. Because landfills have the potential to create adverse environmental impacts, the siteshould not be located close to:

• Residential areas (330m4);

* Airports (S lan):

• Drinking \vater supplies (including wvells) (300m); and,

* rrioation canals, rivers or lak-es (I 00m).

109. Also, landfills should not be located:

- In flood prone areas (200 yr. Flood);

* On lanid where natural slopes are steeper than 20 degrees to thehorizontal (00nm);

* In natural preservation areas; and,

* ln areas of archaeological, natural history or cultural sipnificance.

110. Positive benefits inclide:

* Income generation from waste recvcling onsite fronm the off-site sale ofrecyclable goods;

* Employment opportunities on the landfill site; and.

* Service opportunities associated *with the increased work-er populationto the area.

British Columbia Guidehn-rs for Saniurv Landfills

W e : J,k;-ra Em-:-unmr,.d k-gmem Projec f1 liE P

\Nest Ja,a Jarta Environ nentnl N lanagurement Project (\NJJE2OP) Programrinsic Em ironmental Revie", Page '3

Ill.Scavenuers live in close proximity to landfill sites and are susceptible to various diseasesdue to close contact with decaying refuse. Improvement of their condition wAill be requiredand must be recognized wvhen developing TPA environmental mana gement plans. Providinguseful training im mark-eting of recyclable materials, provision of proper safety equipment.and education in health related matters, vill contribute to their overall well-being.

112. Sanitary landfills of the size being considered under WJJE.\IP are considered CategoryB. The impacts of such projects are well wuderstood. The impacts are generally site-specificand few if any of them are irreversible: and in most cases mitigation measures can bedesigned. Also, all of the landfills proposed are being designed as sanitary landfills (asopposed to controlled), wIhich will require high standards of leachate and gas generationdrainage. However, due to a specific request by GOI, full ANDAL assessments are beingcarried out for the development of the new proposed landfill at Cirelon. At Cirebon, thee.xisting site will be rehabilitated and With operations subject operations to an environmentalmanagement plan. There is also a new site which has already been designated for use and willbe assessed and planned dunrng the first year of the project (APL D (see TOR for TPAKopiluhur).

113.Environmental Management (RKL) and Monitoring (RPL) Plans are a requirement wvhenan AINDAL is prepared. In the past there have been difficulties during the implementation ofthese plans. In order to ensure hat these plans are relevant, financially viable and provide theappropriate level of information, the followving- list of minium requirements for theRKIJRPL should be included into the TOR for the ANDAL

eit jja J .ioL7rtj Emrvrwurzental MIanagernent Project (OUJEIP2)

W\iet Java Jakarta Environmental Managerment Project (WPJJEMlP) Programniaic Environmental Reviewv Page 24

Guidelines for designing and undertaiking the planniin studies required for a SolidWaste Management Plan (SN VIP)

Stage 1: Waste M'vanagement System And Options

* Geographical and Organizational Setting

* Spatial Plan Designations

* Population

* Economic Base

* Physical Descniption/Constraints

Existing Solid W1 aste AoIanqagenent Svstenz

* Characteristics of Solid Waste Stream

* Collection System

* Post-collection System - Operations

• Post-collection System - Administrative and Financial Structure

*Regional Solid Waste Mtanagement Issues and Objectives

* Description of Options

* Options Recommended for Stage 2 Evaluation

Stage 2: Detafled Evaluation Of Options

* Promotional and Educational Proirams

* Reduction and Reuse

. Local Programs

* Encouragement for Provincial, National and Industrial Programs

Reci,vIi

* Solid Waste Stream Strateo'es

* Responsibility

* Collection Svstems

* Processing and Shipping Systems

* Mark-etine System

* Involvement with Industry, Adjacent Jurisdictions and Other Levels ofGovemment

* Financial Evaluation

i hsr Java Jakarta Em irornnerial Afanagerneru Project (iJJEIP}

XXest Java Jakaru Environmental Management Project (NVJJEN1P) Programnmic Environmiental Review Page 25

* Phasinmg Schedule

* Impacts

* Landfll Criteria For Solid Waste Mana2ement

* Responsibility

* Monitoring Disposal Of Solid Waste

* Financial And Operating Control - Regulatory Authority

* Final Report

Stage 3: Plan Preparation And Adoption

Goal And Strategav

* Reduction Goal

* Reduction Strategy

• Solid Waste Stream Targets and Management Strategies Targets

- Household Hazardous Products

- Recyclable Materials

• Wildlife/Hwuman Conflict Management

e Landfill Gas and Open Burning

* Closed Landfills

* User-Pay Programs

Control Of Sites4And Facilities

* DiVision of Responsibility

* Operational Certificates

* Waste Stream Management Licenses

* Recycler Licenses

* Hauler Licenses

* Nlodel Licenses

* Plan Format

Guidelines for the Development of a Monitoring Program for a Sanitarn Landfill

I 14. It will be required that a monitorinc program be submitted to and approved bv thelandfill manager and should address as a minimum, ground and surface water, landfill gasand ambient air quality as set out pursuant to acceptable landfill criteria to be developedduring the first year of the Project (APL 1). M/[onitoring of other environnuntal media such as

Wes.t Ja'o Jakn E--ro-otettenia9 Afaitaggen:ew Project (IfJJE.EfP)

WNest Java Jakarta Environmental Managenent Project (W\JJEMIP) Programmiic Env ironmental Re-iewv Page 2,

ve2etation and soils should be assessed and a program developed as the site-specific situationwarrants.

115.Record keeping will be mandatory wsith the owner andbor operator of a landfill requiredto record and maintain the following infornution:

* Copy of the permit(s) for the site or the certificate(s) of operation;

* Inspection records for inspections conducted by staff and regulatoryagencies (BAPEDALDA);

* Training procedures;

* Contingency plan and notification procedures;

* Closure and post-closure care plans;

* Monitoring results for gas, leachate, surface and ground water;

* Volumes of gas extracted/recovered from the site (where gas collectionand management are carried out);

. Volumes of leachate collected from the site (where leachate colbctionand management are carried out);

Interpretations of monitoring results;

F Financial assurance documentation if financial assurance is required;and,

* Copies of all annual reports.

116. Annual reports will also be mandatorv. An annual Operations and Mornoringy Reportshould be submitted to the Manager according to a schedule defined in the criteria forsanitary landfills. These reports are to contain at least the follow ing infonnation:

= Total volume and/or tonnage of waste dischar,ed into the landfill forthe year;

* Approved design volumne;

* Remaining site life and capacity;

Operational plan for next 12 months;

* Operation and maintenance expenditures;

. Leachate, wvater quality and landfill gas monitoring data andinterpretation;

* Amounts of leachate collectd, treated and disposed:

* Anm changes from approved reports, plans and specifications;

* An up to date contingency plan, noting any amendments made to theplan during the year;

.Amount of landfill gas collected and its disposition; and.

* Review of the closure plan and associated estimated costs.

lVesi J_rru Jaxkrrao Frirotunen,tal Acangqeme,n Projeac (tIJJEJlP}

WN est Ja a Jak rta En% ironniental Ma lnaremnent Project (VAJJE-IP) Progranirnic Fn ironmental Re ieNv Page ,7

7.2 COM\PONENT 3 - S:LALL XND MIEDIUM SCALE INDUSTRY SUBCOMPONENT WHICII

REQUIRES FINANCLAL I.NTER-MEDIARY LE.NDINCG

117. These projects in this subcomponent are desined to have positive environmentaloutcomes. The purpose is to provide for the on-lending azency to target specific small andmedium scale industries to carry out pollution prevention programs and/or install and operatewastewater treatment facilities. The impacts of such programs have been found to be positivein previous projects carried out by OECF (Japan) and with German Government Assistance.Selection of target industries for this project was based on high industry stak-eholder interest,polution loads, toxicity, strong industry associations and the potential for profit generation.Target industries were:

* Tofu Production

* Batik- Manufacture

. Electroplating

118. These industries are xvidespread in the project area with highly polluted wastewaterflows which are presently discharged to the local drainage systems. As the prtposal is forintermediary lending the project should be screened "Category Fl with potential Category Bimpacts".

119. The potential issue for consideration is to ensure that the institutional arrangementsbetween BAPEDAL (responsible for sub project review) ard BAPEDALDA (DKI and WestJava) (responsible for a monitoring plan and on-going review) have been clarified. This isdue to the perception wvithin BAPEDAL that BAPEDALDA do not currently have resourcesto address impacts emanating from small scale and mediun industries. Even though there areresources being made available in the loan to bolster the capacity of BAPEDALDA,discussions concerning the proposed institutional arrangements as to roles and responsibilitiesand point of hand-over should be discussed between the parties with the objective ofpreparing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). It may be necessary for BAPEDAL tocontinue *with the monitoring function for the first year until the additional capacity is inplace at the BAPEDALDA.

120. Ha ing the BAPEDALDA involved in ongomng monitoriniz activities should form animportant objective of the Pro=ram. Every effort should be made to ensure that sufficienttraining is provided at this level and that BAPEDALDA staff are assigned a role inmonitoring activities of those participating small and medium scale industries. Initiative fortraminrr will also have to come from district level agencies that have a regulatoryresponsibility for environmental management Their participation may in fact be a conditionfor continued participation in the Progrram.

121 . The extent of responsibility of the participating Bank- for the environmental impact of thesubproject should also be made clear. There should be some consideration given as towhether it is adVisable to have Bank staff responsible for loan appraisal to be given traininginlto the approved procedures.

Is/ Java Jas-ana <Enironrwerta1Afalangeme,u Project I(JJE)LP,

West Java Jakarta EnN ironun*ntal :Management Project (\XJJE.NIP) PrograniniAic Environmental Re iewv Page 2S

7.3 COMPONENT 5 - COMMUNITY A EVIRONNIENTAL FACILITY

122. This component also requires financial intennediary lending arrangements. The scope of

the CEF includes:

* Improvements to public health by providing a means whereby acommnunity or groups of individuals can carry out improvements toenvironmental conditions at the local level; and,

* Creation of entrepreneurial opportunities through environmentalsubprojects that result in incone generation and better living standards.

123. There are three categories of subprojects that can be considered for inclusion in the CEFprogram: (i) general commnunity environmnental projects; (ii) support to a specific industry orcommercial activity; and (iii) support to groups of households.

124. The initial CEF fiinding is Rp. 120 billion. The cumulative total of CEF loan requestsreceived is projected to increase from about 24 in Year 1 (APL 2) to about 362 in Year 9(APL 3). An estimated 50 percent of requests wvill be approved and funded. Table 7-1 showsa table of indicative projects which have so far been defined at this stage. As showxn in theTable, the average sized project is around 2 Billion Rp. writh the highest at 6.7 Billion and thelowest at 300 Million Rp.

Table 7-1: Indicative List of Defined CEF Subprojects

Description of Subprojects (prelimninarq screening requiredfor all) Rp. Jut.Community Improwements (Construction of SPAL, NICK, and Waste Facilitics) 1,491

Poor Urban Area Improvcment 6,85S

Industrial Area Settlement Improvement 3,14k

Coastal Area Settlement Improvement 2,727

Greening using horticultural product for communitys economical tmprovement . 550

Poor Area Improvement around Mcrak s Harbour (NMerak Sar &S Taman Sari Village) 1,632

Main Drainage Improvements 2,690

Provide Household Toilets 519

Construction for the Drainagc System at Cibiru and Cilcunyi Area 4,644

Construction of MCKs 300

Controlling Water Inundation in Residential Areas 2,966

Construction of Households W astc Water Drainage 750

Demonstration of Integrated Lake Management Situ Tengah 2,80o

Managing the Effect of Water Contamination on Fish Number, by the Public 427

Lakc NLmnagement (Situ Gede) 1,252

Drainage Construction in Low Income Areas 5,395

Ri er Banks Regreening for Agricultural Uses in Bogor NMunicipality 980

Shelter TrTe Planting with Economically Useful Agriculture Products 1,153

Improvements of Fisherman Village and Fish Marketplace (Auction Market) at Cituis Village 4,570

Construction of Communal Septic Tank 4SO

Residential Area Improvement (KIP Tribina), Kel. Pekavonjaya 2,170

P2LDT: House Repair & Environmental Roads and NMCKs 1,80Family Latrine, Household SPAL. and Clean Water Facilitv 1,750

Crcating Lake Nlanagement Model 575

Greening with economically productive plants 721

Iiesz Jcro Jakarta S,r.;ro,u,,e,cl.X .Agru,agerneo Pro-jct (WI'JEM!P)

\Xest Java Ja:ira Enmironmental t'danagenwnt Project (WNJJE2IP) Programnrlic Enmironmental Reviews Page 29

Residential Area Improvement (KIP Tribina) 2,41

Integrated Village Environment Improvement 1,9S,

Family Latrine, Household SPAL, and Clean Water Facilitv 524

Improvement for the Qualitv of Life of Scavengers in DKI Jak-arta s i 5

Education of Scavengers for Solid Waste Management 671

Quality Improvement of Fishermen and Environment through the Efficient Application of 1,258

Technologyv7

Total For Defined Projects 600 6 1

Average ProjectAmazZzii 1,S75

Highesl 6S58E

Lowest 300

125. As the Prouram *vill be using an on-lending facility, OP4.01 requires that institutional

arrangements for routine screening and if necessary, assessment of the environmental irnpacts

of the subprojects should be carried out. The most difficult feature of this component wvill be -

to identify whom or what organization is the proponent of the action. In many cases it may be

a reasonably diffuse community group and in other cases a specific small industy

entrepreneur. In order to ensure that environmental screening is routinely canied out it is

recommended that a similar but slightly modified procedure to that used in a recent Bank

project be utilized (i.e. the Kecamatan Development Project (KDP)).

126. Given that the average subproject cost is on average Rp. I bi]lion, EMPs will possibly be

required particularly to provide for on and offsite impacts created by improvement to

drainage systerns, settlement improvements, sanitation facilities etc. This would involve the

preparation of a review of individual subprojects by the facilitator that wvould need to be

assessed and checked by the Sub-Bagpro in consultation with the Kabupaten or Kotamadya

Bapedalda, Bappeda and/or delegated authority. The basis for the screening should be a list of

questions leading to a conclusion as to wvhether there will be any significant environmental

impacts. This check-list should be prepared for all subprojects and be included as part of the

appraisal documentation. The Bank should sample these checklists during supervision

missions for quality control purposes.

127. The Minisr,/ of Public Works ANDAL Screenilng Regulation should be applied in all

instances particularly if there is any uncertainty as to the impacts of the project This ir the

regulation which designates the limits for the size of a project for preparation of UKIJIPL

and SOP. Care needs to be exercised in using this regulation so that designated protected

areas are also included as part of the basis for the evaluation (KeNIENLH/93). In practice,

the presence of a protected area has tended to be overlooked.

128. It is also considered essential for some training of the Kelurahan level facilitators in the

Agreed Environmental Procedures as well as to give tlem an understanding of the GOI

ANID.A process. This requirement should be added to the scope of wvork of the contact for

the private companv wvhich is to recruit the local level facilitators.

129. The demand for funding will require initial environmental reviews. This should occur

durinc APL 1 and every effort should be rmade to ensure good conmmunity involvement on

environmental projects and that support to specific industry or commercial activity be based

oni sound environmental considerations. This will mean that, where the GOI specifictly

requests, , good A.NDALS are completed, and the focus is on management of the facilities.

Under WVJJEMNP, ANDAL have been agreed to for Kopiluhur at Kodya Cirebon, and the

Cik-apundung W"WT`P and [PLT Tangerang.

Wi es: Ja a Jak7na Emironrnewa! tfanagemene Projecz (JiJEM IP)

V\estJa'a Jakarta EnNironnmntal Management Project (NWJJE\IP) Programnlic Eniironientlu Re;ie,s Page ,0

7.4 COMPONENT 6 - LANIRON'IENTAL MkN'AGEMENT

130. This component includes a number of projects which involve the planming, constructionand operation of either domestic or industrial wvastewater facilities. It is similar to the solidwaste management component in that there are some facilities where there is pdential forsignificant environmental impacts unless the subprojects are adequately planned andimplemented. The projects which are proposed in the first batch include the planning anddesign of reasonably large wastewater facilities (i.e., 7000 r'/day): one for addressingindustrial pollution and one for waste from domestic sources.

13 1. Subprojects being planned in the first year include the Jakarta Industrial estate atPulogadung which was a project originally proposed for implementation during the previousJUDP 3 loan program. The project evolved from a State owned Persero Company project into_a joint public private partnership with a Canadian company in a joint venture. This projecthas become dormant because of the monetary crisis. It is considered to be wothy of supportby the project because it has the potential to treat the waste of up to 200 small scale industrieson the estate and also has the potential to service domestic wastewater from surrounding low-income residential areas. GOI AMDIAL documentaticn was prepared during the previousphase. Due to delays in the project the industrial estate has been operating in violation ofANMDAL environmental regulations and other Ministerial decrees set out in theEnvironmental Management Plan (not an unusual situation) prepared for the estate.

132. It is considered that the project should be supported but the study team for the update ofthe detailed engineering design and feasibility assessment should also include anenvironmental reviewv to ensure that all current viohtions are addressed and that any sitespecific implications for using the preferred site for domestic wasteNvater in the adjoininrgresidential areas are allowed for in the feasibility analysis and detailed engineening design.The project may raise Category B Impacts and a UKLIUPL is to be prepared under GOIAMDAL procedures.

133.The second project involves domestic wasteNvater teatnient plants at Tamansari andPasirluyu in Kotamadva Bandung. These areas have very high population densities andrequire an off-site sanitation solution. A nunber of options have already been evaluated andthe favoured option at this stage is a series of fringing open collection (cutoff) drains leadingto large communal septic tanks. Approximnately 2500ini of land xwill be required and thecurrent proposal is to use government land o'wned by Dinas Pertamanan. PU criteria do notrequire a full ANDAL for a communal septic tank that only requires 2500m2 of land. The1996 KepMen PU requires ANDAL for an oxidation pond larger than 10 hedtares,UTKL/UPLfor a pon betwveen 5 and 10 hectres, and nothen for 5 hectares or less.

134. Experience by the Baik on previous projects in Surabaya Urban Development Projectsuggests that adequate community preparation is essential for obtaining a reasonable numberof house connections for this type of project.

135.The current TOR for the ANDAL xvhich has been prepared xxill need to be modified toinclude a detailed methodologv for ensuring that the comrimunity participation aspects of thissubproject are emphasised. The sTut4 team should include a socialplanner/sociolocist"institutional speciaList Nwho will be responsible for implementation of thecommunity participation and public awareness program. The community preparation phase of

4 es j.Jna ia,s:r,Ia Eu rpU.n/ Amiagenieri froject (WJJEM 1P)

\ 'est Ja% a Jakarta Emnironniental Managenent Project (WNJJELtIPI Progranimtic En%ironmental Revie Page 31

this wvork shOLuld start at least one year prior' to physical construction in order to increase thelikelihood of attracting higher connection rates.

I36. The other projects defined so far in this component aire listed in Table 7-2. The

indicative projects wvhich are listed as J projects will have potentli Category B Impacts, and

as shown, would be screened and require UKL/UPL using GOI procedures. The GOI is

responsible for revievwing these and the Bank- will be limited to a check of the supervisors.

The local government responsible for implementation as the proponent *vill be responsible forscreening and implementation of the necessary level of assessment. All other projects were

Category C (OP 4.01) or NA under AivIDAL procedures.

Table 7-2: List of Defined Environmental Management Projects

Sub- Project Description Rp. IBRD ANIDALJuta Category Category

H Develop City Parks in Kab. Cirebon as part of "Blue Sk " Program 330 C NA

J PROKASIH 2,965 C NA

I Convert from Benzene to LPG for General Transportation Ve hicles and 8,70 C NATaxis(Revolving Fund Nlodel)

H Ciry Greening by planting the economic-useful plants 745 C NA

I Convert from Benzene to LPG for General Transportation Vehicles and 600 C NATaxis(Revolving Fund Nodel)

J Cikapundung River Training Works 2,775 B ANDAL_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

J Cikapundung River Improvement Control Program to Control Waste Water 17,793 B ANDALin Bandung

J Normalization of Small Rivers (13) in Kodya Bandung 15,096 B ANDAL

H Citv Parks and Green Belt Development 1,315 C NA

H Greening 858 C NA

J Construction of'CentralizedIlnteerated Industrial IPAL for Industries around 10.000 B UIJLUPL.Mookevaart River

J Construction of'Centralized,Integrated Industnal IllAL for Industries around 10,000 B UKLJU['LSaiN River

J Construction of Centralizedrlntegrated Industrial IPAL for Industries around 10,000 B UKL/UIPLCirarab River

J Construction of Treatment for Animal Slaug,htering 1.65 B UKL'LUPI,

J PROKASIH and Improvement of'Clean W'ater Facility 688 C NAH Town Greening 768 C NA

I Air Quality 63,667 C NA

J Centralized Waste Watwr Treatment - JIEP (Physical Construction) 19,050 B UKLIJPL

J Prokasih Cili%wung and Cisadane Ri%ers 10,145 B UKLfUPL

_ 177,145

S052

63667

330

H - Greening_

I - Air Quality

I - Surface Water

7.5 IkAUNING

iesteJmuJakarrta Emniromnental Mtkagemens Project (!IDJJELP)

WN est Java Jakarta Ensironmental Management Project (MJJ IP) Progranmniic Environmental Re-io% Page 3i

137. An important objective of the Project is to build greater capacity for managenVironmental projects at the local government level. A significant trairning progam has beenincorporated into the project design to accomplish this goal. The approach taken is said to bevery flexible. The Secretariat's Traininct Unit under the Pimpro's direction will beresponsible for tendering training contractors, scheduling courses and inviting participants.For locally directed training, the municipaldistrict governments themselves will mak-e thefinal decision on who vill be trained, who Xvill do the training and when and where it wvilloccur.

138.The training plan is targeted mainly at the officials and staff of local governments. As faras possible it i demand driven and operates in a "bottom-up" fashion. For example, heads ofmunicipal/district govemments are given a budget for training programs and an outline ofwhat types of training are acceptable. Based on local conditions, they then select coursetopics, training suppliers and candidates for training. The suggested list of training coursesincludes provision for 114 participants on environmental regulations and over 400 onenvironmental planning and management (see Table 7-3). There are also sectcr specificcourses for 24 participants in more specialized areas such as solid waste management andwastewater management. However, as the process is "bottomup" wvith significant localdecision-mak-ing authority, the actual courses may deviate from this list to allow foradaptation to local priorities and should be integrated to the extent possible to supportspecific subprojects being planned and assessed in the first two years of implementation(APL 1).

,: crJa JJaLarr. Emrrorvnernial Afaw;gem,ew Project (tIJJEAfP)

Wsest Java Jakarta Environmental Managenient Project (JJEM.NIF) Pr-ograunimic Emironmental Review Page 33

Table 7-3: Proposed Training Program

INo. Training Program Days Hours Offered bv NuP nberof. . ~~~~~~~~~~~Par-ticip ants

I. Overseas Comparative Study .0 -

2. Solid Waste Management 1 - _ 63. Overseas Cornpost Technology 0 - Canadian Insttuton 54. Project Finance 15 124 LPPM X'

15 Project Orientation 1 7 Project 2196. Project Management 10 S2 LPPM 1027. Environmental Re-eulations l 7 INKINDO 114S. Environmental Planning and 14 98 INKANDO 414

l Management

9. Solid Waste Management 7 49 AKA Bogor 2410. Wastewat er Managrement 1 2 S4 AKA Bogor 24 1HI. Water Pollution Monitoring 1 2 4 AKA Bogor 2412. Community Participation 7 4S LPEM 2413. Cleaner Production 7 4S AKA Bogor 2414. Air Pollution Monitoring 12 84 AKA Bogor 1 215. Public Health Management 16 132 FKI -Ll 2416. Treasury Certificate A & B 15 105 BadiklatDepdagri 6017. Evaluating Training Propra=s l 7 SDM Indonesia, DDI 218. CEF Implementanon Course 7 49 Project 5619. Privattion for Senior Officials 6 49 LPPM 7520. Planning and Implementirg 12 9S LPPM 90

Privatization- Mechanisms

12 Benefit Monitoring and Evaluation 3 21 BadiklatDepdagri 400

8.0 Conclusions & Recommendations

1 39. WJJEMP was reviewed in relation to OP4.0 1 and the GOI AMDAL procedures. Inaddition to the Bank and GOI environrnmntal requirements, the design of WVJJEMP is furtherstrengthened through the selection of the Bank's Adaptable Program Loan (A-PL) approach.-APL offers the GOI the necessary flexibility required; as a phased approach to borrowincT willallowv the government to makee any necessaty adjustnents to the Program that xwill improvethe overall environmental perforrnance of related actiVities. During APL 1, overallenVironmental management protection will be the prinary focus with policy developmentand environmnental plamting measures developed during the first three years. Infrastructuredevelopment, including the development of sanitary landfills, wsill be the main thrust underAPL 2, and will be guided by the early adoption of environmental measures thus contributingtow ards sound environmental manacement.

140.The proposed subprojects raise issues relevant to the environmental assessment (EA) andoperational policies of the World Bank and the GOI AŽvIDAL process. Many of the initiativespariicularly in the first two years of the project involve the desigrn and planningg of technicalassistance and raising environmental and health awareness through broadly based publicinformation campaigns and district specific spatial planning projects. These initiatives wouldbe screened as Category C activities under the Bank- procedures and would not qualify forscreening under the GOI AMNDAL procedures.

1Vest Jawva Jakarta Eaviroanne,ia, Atanagement Projec: (t J.JEAfP)

\Vest Java JakartaEnvironmental Ianagenmnt Project (WJJENIP) Prograntilniic Environmental Reviey P'age 34

14l.There were four of the sLx components wvhich were found to contain subprojects thatrequired screening under the combined World Bank- and GOI procedures. Using thesecombined requirements it is considered that the program should be implemented as aCategory B project.

8.1 COMPONENT2 - SOLID WASTE

142. It is considered that such projects are Category B. The irnpacts of such projects are wellunderstood. The inpacts are generally site-specific and few if any of them are irreversible;and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed. Also, all of the landfills proposed arebeing designed as sanitary landfills (as opposed to controlled), *which will require highstandards of leachate drainage and gas generation control. Due to a speicific request fromGOI, a full ANDAL assessment wvill being carried out for the development of a newproposed landfill at Cirebon.

8.1.1 Proposedl Mitigation or Environmental Safeguard

143. Environmental Management (RKL) and Monitoring (RPL) Plans are a requirement whenan ANDAL is prepared. In order to ensure that these plans are relevant, financially viable andprovide the appropriate level of infornation the folloNwing list of minimum requimnents forthe RKIJRKL should be included into the TOR for the ANDAL.

144. Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans (RKIJRPL's) should include projectsto be included in Contract Specifications. Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) toinclude: (i) a thorough but relevant description of the environmental context of proposed orexisting site; (ii) a description'analysis of altemate sites within a spatial planning context; and(ii) a description of the 'Community Consultation Program' carried out which includes allstakleholders and an-angements for on-going consultation.

1 45. A Site Management Plan should include:

* Proposed area of site with projected volumes

* Site layout

* Soil and geology xwith geotechnical data and relevant analysis

* Type of lining proposed

* Un&rdrainage proposed

Vent drainage proposed

* Overburden removal and storame

* Cell development plan

* Leachate treatment design

* Operation and maintenance profile

. Projected budgets including equipment schedule, staff w"ith totalrunninc cost per annum.

8.2 COMPONENT3 - SNALIJMEDIUM SCALE INDUSTRIES

.E '(jr 7~G J c:k Va Esh-rw Lnvo,wu i Ata ?n,em, Froject (,IfjEA!P,

W .est Java Jak.art EnironmenEal Managenent Project (XXJJE.MIP) Progranmmic Env-ironmental Revies Page 35

146. These industries are vwidespread in the project area wvith highly polluted wastewaterflows which are presently discharged to the local drainage systems. As the proposal is forintermediary lending the project should be screened "Categorn Fl with potential Categorn Bimpacts".


147. The potential issue for consideration is to ensure that the institutional arrangementsbetween BAPEDAL (responsible for subproject review) and BAPEDALDA (DKI and WestJava) (responsible for a monitoring plan and on-going review) have been clarified. This isdue to the perception within BAPEDAL that BAPEDALDA do not currently have resourcesto address small and mediumscale industries. Even though there are resources being madeavailable in the loan to bolster the capacity of BAPEDALDA, discussions concernincg theproposed institutional arrangements as to roles and responsibilities and point of handovershould be discussed between the parties w ith the objective of preparing a Memorandum ofUnderstanding (MOU). It may be necessary for BAPEDAL to continue with the monitoringfunction for the first year until the additional capacity is in place at the BAPEDALDA. It isproposed that all actiVities over Rp. I billion skDuld involve the local BAPEDALDA wvhenformulating an EMP. The learning experience Vill contnrbute to strengthen the institutionsthrough their involvement in the Project Their participation should also be based on theirowvn training initiatives and should also be used as a gauge for their continued involvement

148. The extent of responsibility of the participating Bank for the environmental impact of thesubproject should also be made clear. There should be some consideration given as towhether it is advisa'e to have Bank staff responsible for loan appraisal to be given traininginto the approved procedures.

8.3 COMIPONENT4 - CO;N,IU;SITY ENVIRONMENETAL FACILIT (CEF)

149. As the Project will be using an onilending facility, OP4.Ol requires that institutionalarran,ements for routine screening and if necessary, assessment of the environmental impactsof the subprojects should be carried out.

8.3.1 Proposed Institutional Arran-nements

15O. The most difficult feature of this component will be to identify whom or Xwhatorganization is the proponent of the action. I.n many cases it may be a reasonably diffusecommunity group and in other cases a specific small industry entrepreneur. In order to ensurethat envirnmental screening is routinely carried out it is recommended that a similar butsliizhtly modified procedure be employed similar to that used in a recent Bank project i.e. theKecamatan Development project (KDP).

51. This would involve the preparation of a simple check-list form for each sub-project by thefacilitator that w ould need to be review ed and checked by the Sub-Bagpro in consultationwtih the Kabupaten or Kotamadya Bappedelda, Bappeda and' or delegated authority. Thebasis for the screening should be a list of questions leading to a conclusion as to whethertLhere will be any significant environmental impacts. This check-list should be prepared for allsubprojects and be included as part of the appraisal documentation. These check-lists shouldhe sampled by the Bank either routinely to RSI Jakarta or during supervision missions forquality control purposes.

;es Javo Jak-rra Emirorxmnc,z.aJl Abfnqzogmerr Project t;JJE.tAP)

West Ja%a Jakarta EnNironn emtai Managenment Project CAJJENIP) Programnmic Environniental ReNie%> Page 36

152. It is also considered essential for some training of the Kelurahan level facilitators in theAgreed Enmironmental Procedures as wvell as to give them an understanding of the GOIAMDAL process. This requirement should be added to he scope of work of the contract forthe private company wvhich is to recruit the local level facilitators.

8.3.2 CEF Environment Checklist

153. A CEF environmental check-list is to be developed during APL 1 vith CEF subprojectsbeing implemented during APL 2. This conponent xvill support generally small communitysupported initiatives such as greeninc, smallscale communal waste treatment (septic tanks)systems, drainage etc.; some of which could require ANDAL thus they would be classed asCategory B. In support of a hecklist it is also proposed to use the Environmental Data Sheetfrom the Bankl Operational Manual. For instance, required infornation will include thefollovwing:

* Project location and information about the kley enmironmentalcharacteristics of the area likely to be affected by the project, andproximrity of any protected areas or sites or critical natural habitats;

* Major environmental issues identified or suspected in the project;

* Other environmental issues of lesser scope associated vith the project;

* Proposed actions to mitigate environmental issues descnbed above;and,

* Justification/rationale for enviromnental the selected category andreasons and explanation of any changes from initial classification,including whether any changes relate to altematives'.

154. In addition, a reporting schedule for Category B subprojects should be submitted. It isprobable that a separate EA report Nwill be required. The status of any other environmentalstudies, lists of local groups and local NGOs consulted and, xvhere EA repats were madepublic locally, tells whether borroNwer has given permission to release EA report, etc.

8.4 COMPONENT 6 - IN'IRON'MIFENTAL MlXNAGEMIENT

155. This component includes a number of projects that involve the planning, constructionand operation of either domestc or industrial xvastewater facilities. It is sintilar to the solidxvaste component in that there are some facilities wvhere there is potential for significantenvironmental impacts unless the subprojects are adequately planned and implemented.

1 56. The projects xvhich were defined include the planninmg and design of reasonably largewvastewater facilities (i.e., 7,000 m`/day): one for addressing industial pollution and one forwvaste from domestic sources. The domestic xvaste\vater facilities proposed in KotamadyaBandung wvould be a Category B World Bank project, but an ANDAL has been requested byGOI and a draft TOR has been prepared. The industrial wastewater project at PulogadungIndustrial Estate in Jakarta wvas also considered to be Category B and a UKL/UPI. is to beprepared under GOI procedures as part of the feasibility revieW.

Environmental Data Sheet from Ban'k OP 40.1

If'eS Jav Jakarta Enrnrowrzraz.vJi Mtamugernzent Project (If JJE.AIP)

\Vest Ja a Jakarta Environmental Management Project (WNJJEMIP) Progranimic Environmental Re%iewv Page 37

8.4.1 Proposed En-ironmental Nitigation

157. The current TOR for the ANDAL for the Kotarnadya Bandung wastewater treatmentplant that has been prepared xVii1 need to be modified to include a detailed arthodology forensuring that the community participation aspects of this subproject are emphasized. Thestudy team should include a social planner/socioloatist'institutional specialist who * ifl beresponsible for implementation of the communih, participaticl and public awarenessprogram. The community preparation phase of this work should start at least one year prior tophysical construction in order to increase the likelihood of attracting higher connection rates.

158. For the Jakarta Industrial Estate Project at Pulogadung, it is considered that the projectshould be supported. The study team for the update of the detai]ed engineering design andfeasibility assessment should also include an environmental review (UKIUPL) to ensurethat all current violations are addressed and that any site-specific implications for using thepreferred site for domestic wastewater in the adjoining residential areas are allowed for in the-feasibility analysis and final DED.

159. Other projects defined to date were screened as Category C projects under World Bankprocedures and were not applicable under GOI AMDAL procedures.

I es; Ja a Jakarrta E,n!rownailo tianagemet Project (1 JIJEAP)

Public Disclosure Authorized -E-382 · Public Disclosure Authorized ... The geographic area covered...

Documents

Transcript of Public Disclosure Authorized -E-382 · Public Disclosure Authorized ... The geographic area covered...