Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016...

47
Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ] TITLE OF NEW CONTENT Type your content here ... Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard. Comment: The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement. Related Item Public Input No. 36-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 7.10.4.3] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley Organization: American Gas Association Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:53:40 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Action: Unknown Reason Resolution: See SR-4. National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... 1 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Transcript of Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016...

Page 1: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 36-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 7.10.4.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:53:40 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: See SR-4.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 2: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 38-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 9.4.3 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:54:42 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: See SR-5.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

2 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 3: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 12-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 42-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 12.3.8.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:56:33 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: See SR-6.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

3 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 4: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 13-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 48-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 13.1.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:57:53 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: See SR-7.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

4 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 5: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 14-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 52-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 13.8.2.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:59:09 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected

Resolution: See SR-8.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

5 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 6: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 19-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after 3.3.8]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:42:50 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-1-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNGstandard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clearunderstanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safetycodes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid inconsistent enforcement.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

6 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 7: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 7-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 20-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after 3.3.11.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:44:44 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-2-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNGstandard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clearunderstanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safetycodes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid inconsistent enforcement.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

7 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 8: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 21-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 4.8.2 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:46:27 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: See SR-9.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

8 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 9: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 9-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 35-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 7.8.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:51:47 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: See SR-10.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

9 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 10: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.4 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 18, PI 19, PI 20 proposed adding verbiage to section 3 to establish the Plant/ Facility/ Component hierarchy and then proposed aligning the use of these terms throughout the standard in resolved PI’s 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 so that these standardized terms can be consistently applied. A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNG standard.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider adding these terms in section 3 and throughout the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 18, 19, 20, 21, 35, 36, 38, 42, 48, 52 to better define the various segments of the plants covered by the NFPA 59 standard. This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clear understanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safety codes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid in consistent enforcement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 18-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after 3.3.25]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:38:39 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-3-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: A similar approach using these terms were added in the latest edition of the NFPA 59A LNGstandard.This will add clarity to these commonly used terms and ensure that the AHJ has a clearunderstanding of the requirements for the utility gas plants. Where an AHJ that enforces safetycodes at both LP-Gas Utility Plant and LNG Facilities, the use of the same terms should aid inconsistent enforcement.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

10 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 11: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. 4.5.2.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

11 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 12: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

4.5.2.2*

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

12 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 13: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Fixed electrical equipment and wiring installed within the classified areas specified in Table 4.5.2.2 shallcomply with Table 4.5.2.2 and shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 70.

Table 4.5.2.2 Electrical Area Classification

Part Location Extent of Classified Areaa

Equipment ShallBe Approved for

NationalElectrical Code,

Class Ia, Group

Db

A

Unrefrigerated containers otherthan cylinders and ASME verticalcontainers of less than 1000 lb(454 kg) water capacity

Within 15 ft (4.6 m) in all directions fromconnections, except connections otherwisecovered in Table 4.5.2.2

Division 2

B

Refrigerated storage containersWithin 15 ft (4.6 m) in all directions fromconnections otherwise covered in Table4.5.2.2

Division 2

Area inside dike to the level of the top of thedike

Division 2

Cc

Tank vehicle and tank carloading and unloading

Within 5 ft (1.5 m) in all directions fromconnections regularly made or disconnectedfor product transfer

Division 1

Beyond 5 ft (1.5 m) but within 15 ft (4.6 m) inall directions from a point where connectionsare regularly made or disconnected andwithin the cylindrical volume between thehorizontal equator of the sphere and grade(see Figure A.4.5.2.2)

Division 2

D

Gauge vent openings other thanthose on cylinders and ASMEvertical containers of less than1000 lb (454 kg) water capacity

Within 5 ft (1.5 m) in all directions from pointof discharge

Division 1

Beyond 5 ft (1.5 m) but within 15 ft (4.6 m) inall directions from point of discharge

Division 2

E

Relief device discharge otherthan those on cylinders andASME vertical containers of lessthan 1000 lb (454 kg) watercapacity and vaporizers

Within direct path of discharge

Note: Fixedelectrical equipmentshould preferablynot be installed.

Fc

Pumps, vapor compressors,gas–air mixers and vaporizers(other than direct-fired orindirect-fired with an attached oradjacent gas-fired heat source)

Indoors without ventilationEntire room and any adjacent room notseparated by a gastight partition

Division 1

Within 15 ft (4.6 m) of the exterior side of anyexterior wall or roof that is not vaportight orwithin 15 ft (4.6 m) of any exterior opening

Division 2

Indoors with ventilationEntire room and any adjacent room notseparated by a gastight partition

Division 2

Outdoors in open air at or abovegrade

Within 15 ft (4.6 m) in all directions from thisequipment and within the cylindrical volumebetween the horizontal equator of the sphereand grade (see Figure A.4.5.2.2)

Division 2

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

13 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 14: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Part Location Extent of Classified Areaa

Equipment ShallBe Approved for

NationalElectrical Code,

Class Ia, Group

Db

G

Pits or trenches containing orlocated beneath LP-Gas valves,pumps, vapor compressors,regulators, and similarequipment

Without mechanical ventilation Entire pit or trench Division 1

Entire room and any adjacent room notseparated by a gastight partition

Division 2

Within 15 ft (4.6 m) in all directions from pit ortrench when located outdoors

Division 2

With mechanical ventilation Entire pit or trench Division 2

Entire room and any adjacent room notseparated by a gastight partition

Division 2

Within 15 ft (4.6 m) in all directions from pit ortrench when located outdoors

Division 2

H

Pipelines and connectionscontaining operational bleeds,drips, vents, or drains

Within 5 ft (1.5 m) in all directions from pointof discharge

Division 1

Beyond 5 ft (1.5 m) from point of discharge,same as part F of this table

I Piers and wharvesWithin 5 ft (1.5 m) in all directions fromconnections regularly made or disconnectedfor product transfer

Division 1

Beyond 5 ft (1.5 m) but within 15 ft (4.6 m) inall directions from a point where connectionsare regularly made or disconnected andwithin the cylindrical volume between thehorizontal equator of the sphere and thevessel deck (see Figure A.4.5.2.2)

Division 2

aThe classified area shall not extend beyond an unpierced wall, roof, or solid vaportight partition.

bSee Article 500 Hazardous (Classified) Locations, in NFPA 70 for definitions of classes, groups, anddivisions.

cSee A.4.5.2.2.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• PI 57 proposed editing Table 4.4.2.2 Electrical Area Classification, Part “E” on Relief Valve Discharges by reinserting the original area classifications that was in this table in the 1998 edition of NFPA 59 prior to its erroneous removal in the 2001 edition. Comments:• AGA contends that the premise considered when the verbiage was removed is not appropriate in the stated situations, and that the current depiction in Part “E” of the table is misleading and is cause for concern to public safety. This same table is used in the NFPA 59A standard with the same verbiage as AGA proposed in PI 57. It is a dangerous situation to have this obvious contradiction in different NFPA standards where similar risks exist. • This coupled with PI 55 which was approved in FR16 to be added to the annex material supports that the initial reasoning for the changes in Part E were not appropriate in the stated situations.

Related Item

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

14 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 15: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Input No. 57-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 4.5.2.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 10:07:32 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-11-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: The committee would like to return Row E to how it appeared in the 1998 version of the code. Thehazard exists in this area and requires the proper application of hazardous classified areas.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

15 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 16: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. 4.10.3.2 ]

12.3.6.1

Components meeting the requirements of 4.10.3.

2

Tests are required after 1 shall be tested 6 months of burial of the system identified in 4.10.1 includingafter initial burial. Tests shall include component-to-soil potential measurements with respect to either acontinuous reference cell electrode or an electrode using close spacing, not to exceed 20 ft (6 m), and soilresistivity measurements at potential profile peak locations to evaluate the potential profile at thecomponent or along the pipeline. If tests indicate that a corrosive condition exists, the affected componentsshall be cathodically protected in accordance with Section 12 4 . 3 10 .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This section is part of text moved from Chapter 12 to Chapter 4 in the first draft meeting. It refers to testing which is to take place well after initial installation so should more properly be located in the maintenance section to reduce the chance it will be missed.

Move section 4.10.3.2 (numbered as 12.3.3.3.2 in 2015 edition) to Chapter 12 as a new 12.3.6.1 (as numbered in 2015 edition) and re-number the remaining sections. Correct references.

Change wording slightly to: Components meeting the requirements of 4.10.3.1 shall be tested 6 months after initial burial. Tests shall include component-to-soil potential ... in accordance with section 4.10.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 59-2016 [Section No. 4.10.3.3]

Related Item

First Revision No. 27-NFPA 59-2015 [Sections 12.3.1, 12.3.2, 12.3.3, 12.3.4, 12.3.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Michael Osmundson

Organization: Lexicon Propane Group

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 15:02:47 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-12-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: Existing section 4.10.3.2: This section is part of text moved from Chapter 12 to Chapter 4 in the firstdraft meeting. It refers to testing which is to take place well after initial installation so should moreproperly be located in the maintenance section to reduce the chance it will be missed.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

16 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 17: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Move section 4.10.3.2 (numbered as 12.3.3.3.2 in 2015 edition) to Chapter 12 as a new 12.3.1.1(1)and re-number the remaining sections. Correct references.

Change wording slightly to: Components meeting the requirements of 4.10.3.1 shall be tested 6months after initial burial. Tests shall include component-to-soil potential ... in accordance withsection 4.10.

Existing section 4.10.3.3: This section is part of text moved from Chapter 12 to Chapter 4 in the firstdraft meeting. It refers to testing for components without cathodic protection installed. Since thistesting will be done on a regular basis, it should be located in the maintenance section.

Move section 4.10.3.3 (numbered as 12.3.3.3.3 in 2015 edition) to Chapter 12 as a new 12.3.1.1(3)(as numbered in 2015 edition) and renumber the remaining sections.

Correct text should be: 12.3.1.1(3). Each component meeting the requirements of 4.10.3.1 shall betested by personnel.

See the related comment to move the initial testing of these components ahead of this section.This will cause section 12.3.6.1 to be renumbered.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

17 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 18: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. 4.10.3.3 ]

4 12 . 10. 3. 3 6.1(3)

After the initial tests in 4 12 . 10. 3. 2 6.1 , additional tests shall be conducted every 3 years and notexceeding 39 months to reevaluate the condition of the unprotected components. If tests indicate that anactive corrosion exists either by electrical survey of leak repair or exposed pipe inspection records, theaffected components shall be cathodically protected in accordance with 4.10.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This section is part of text moved from Chapter 12 to Chapter 4 in the first draft meeting. It refers to testing for components without cathodic protection installed. Since this testing will be done on a regular basis, it should be located in the maintenance section.

Move section 4.10.3.3 (numbered as 12.3.3.3.3 in 2015 edition) to Chapter 12 as a new 12.3.6.1(3) (as numbered in 2015 edition) and re-number the remaining sections.

Correct text should be: 12.3.6.1(3) Each component meeting the requirements of 4.10.3.1 shall be tested by personnel ...

See the related comment to move the initial testing of these components ahead of this section. This will cause section 12.3.6.1 to be renumbered.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 59-2016 [Section No. 4.10.3.2]

Related Item

First Revision No. 27-NFPA 59-2015 [Sections 12.3.1, 12.3.2, 12.3.3, 12.3.4, 12.3.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Michael Osmundson

Organization: Lexicon Propane Group

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 15:25:31 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-12-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: Existing section 4.10.3.2: This section is part of text moved from Chapter 12 to Chapter 4 in the firstdraft meeting. It refers to testing which is to take place well after initial installation so should moreproperly be located in the maintenance section to reduce the chance it will be missed.

Move section 4.10.3.2 (numbered as 12.3.3.3.2 in 2015 edition) to Chapter 12 as a new 12.3.1.1(1)and re-number the remaining sections. Correct references.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

18 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 19: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Change wording slightly to: Components meeting the requirements of 4.10.3.1 shall be tested 6months after initial burial. Tests shall include component-to-soil potential ... in accordance withsection 4.10.

Existing section 4.10.3.3: This section is part of text moved from Chapter 12 to Chapter 4 in the firstdraft meeting. It refers to testing for components without cathodic protection installed. Since thistesting will be done on a regular basis, it should be located in the maintenance section.

Move section 4.10.3.3 (numbered as 12.3.3.3.3 in 2015 edition) to Chapter 12 as a new 12.3.1.1(3)(as numbered in 2015 edition) and renumber the remaining sections.

Correct text should be: 12.3.1.1(3). Each component meeting the requirements of 4.10.3.1 shall betested by personnel.

See the related comment to move the initial testing of these components ahead of this section.This will cause section 12.3.6.1 to be renumbered.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

19 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 20: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 59-2016 [ Chapter 7 ]

Chapter 7 Piping, Valves, and Equipment

7.1 General.

7.1.1

Piping, valves, and equipment shall be suitable for LP-Gas service at the minimum design temperatureand the maximum design pressure.

7.1.1.1

The design and fabrication of process piping systems shall be in accordance with ASME B31.3, ProcessPiping, except as modified by the provisions of this chapter and any applicable federal pipeline regulations.

7.1.1.2

Pressure-containing metal parts of equipment for application temperatures of –20°F (–29°C) or above shallbe fabricated of one of the following materials:

(1) Steel

(2) Ductile (nodular) iron in accordance with ASTM A395/A395M, Specification for Ferritic Ductile IronPressure-Retaining Castings for Use at Elevated Temperatures, or malleable iron in accordance withASTM A536, Specifications for Ductile Iron Castings, Grade 60-40-18 or 65-45-12

(3) Malleable iron in accordance with ASTM A47/A47M, Standard Specification for Ferritic Malleable IronCastings; brass; bronze; or equivalent copper alloys

7.1.1.3

Piping that can contain liquid LP-Gas, that can be isolated by valving, and that requires hydrostatic reliefvalves, as specified in Section 10.8, shall have as a minimum a design pressure of 350 psi (2400 kPa) orthe maximum discharge pressure of any pump or other source feeding that piping system, whichever isgreater.

7.1.1.4

The piping specified in 7.1.1.3 shall be subjected to a pressure test, in accordance with 7.1.1.1, of no lessthan 150 percent of the design pressure.

7.1.2

Piping connections to the container for sizes over 2 in. (5 cm) nominal pipe diameter excluding excess-flowvalves shall be made by welding or with welded flanges.

7.1.3

Cast-iron valves, pipe, and fittings shall not be used in piping that carries LP-Gas and LP-Gas–airmixtures, except for container valves or fittings made of malleable or ductile iron used within the limitationsset forth in 323.4.2 of ASME B31.3, Process Piping.

7.1.4

Emergency shutoff valves shall be approved and shall incorporate all of the following means of closing:

(1) Automatic shutoff through thermal (fire) actuation

(2) Manual shutoff from two or more remote locations

(3) Manual shutoff at the installed location

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

20 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 21: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.1.5

Fusible elements used for closing emergency shutoff valves shall meet the following requirements:

(1) The melting point shall not exceed 250°F (121°C).

(2) The element shall be connected to actuate the valve.

(3) The element shall not be more than 5 ft (1.5 m) from the nearest end of the hose or swivel-type pipingconnected to the line in which the valve is installed.

7.1.6

Gaskets used to retain LP-Gas in flanged connections shall be resistant to the action of LP-Gas.

7.1.7

Gaskets used to retain LP-Gas in flanged connections shall be either:

(1) Made of metal or other material that is confined in metal that has a melting point over 1500°F (816°C)or protected against fire exposure, or

(2) Nonmetallic or electrically insulating where electrical insulating fittings are required

7.1.8

Gaskets used to retain LP-Gas in flanged connections shall be replaced when a flange is opened.

7.1.9

All piping, tubing, fittings, and valves shall be leak tested after assembly and proved to be free of leaks atnot less than normal operating pressures. Tests shall not be made with a flame.

7.1.10*

Piping systems including interconnecting of permanently installed containers shall compensate forexpansion, contraction, jarring, vibration, and settling.

7.1.10.1

The use of metallic flexible connectors shall be permitted.

7.1.10.2

The use of nonmetallic pipe, tubing, or hose for permanently interconnecting containers shall beprohibited.

7.1.11

Piping shall be supported and protected against physical damage and corrosion.

7.1.12

Underground and submerged piping shall be protected and maintained as required in Section 12.3.

7.2 Container Valves and Accessories.

7.2.1

All shutoff valves and accessory equipment (liquid or gas) shall be compatible with LP-Gas and designedfor not less than the maximum extreme pressure and temperature to which they can be subjected.

7.2.1.1

Valves for use with nonrefrigerated containers that can be subjected to container pressure shall have arated working pressure of at least 250 psi (1.7 MPa).

7.2.1.2

Cast-iron valves, piping, and fittings shall be prohibited on LP-Gas containers and their connections exceptfor container valves or fittings that are made of malleable or ductile iron.

7.2.2

All piping connections to containers shall have shutoff valves located as close to the container aspractical.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

21 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 22: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.2.2.1

The valves shall be accessible for operation and maintenance under normal and emergency conditions,either by location or by means of permanently installed special provisions.

7.2.2.2

Valves installed in unobstructed locations that are not more than 6 ft (1.8 m) above ground level shall beconsidered accessible.

7.2.2.3

Stairs, ladders, platforms, remote operators, extension handles, and so forth, shall be installed wherevalves are located 6 ft (1.8 m) or more above ground level.

7.2.2.4

Safety relief connections, liquid level gauging devices, and plugged openings shall not be required to beaccessible.

7.2.3

Excess-flow valves, where required by this code, shall close automatically and shall be selected andinstalled for rated closing flows based on process requirements.

7.2.4

The connections or lines, including valves, fittings, and so forth, downstream of an excess-flow valve shallhave a greater capacity than the rated flow of the excess-flow valve.

7.2.5

All liquid and vapor connections on containers, other than pressure relief valves, liquid level gaugingdevices, and openings not larger than No. 54 drill size [0.055 in. (1.4 mm)], as covered in 7.2.6 and 7.4.3,shall be equipped with one of the following:

(1) A back-pressure check valve and either a manual valve or an emergency shutoff valve

(2) An excess-flow valve with a fail-closed hydraulic or pneumatically actuated valve in compliance withAPI 607, Fire Test for Soft-Seated Quarter-Turn Valves; API 6FA, Specifications for Fire Tests forValves; or the equivalent, equipped for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire)actuation where the thermal element is installed in compliance with 7.1.5

(3) A quick-acting internal valve incorporating the means of closing specified in 7.1.4

7.2.6

Openings from a container or through fittings attached directly on the container to which pressure gaugeconnection is made shall not be required to be equipped with an excess-flow valve if such openings arenot larger than a No. 54 drill size [0.055 in. (1.4 mm)].

7.2.7

Excess-flow and back-pressure check valves, where required by this standard, shall be located inside thecontainer or at a point outside where the line enters the container. In the latter case, installation shall bemade in such a manner that any stress beyond the excess-flow or back-pressure check valve will notcause breakage between the container and such valve.

7.2.8

Excess-flow valves shall be designed with a bypass, not to exceed a No. 60 drill size [0.040 in. (1.02 mm)]opening, to allow equalization of pressures.

7.2.9

All inlet and outlet connections on any container shall be labeled or color coded, or valves connected tothe connections shall be labeled to designate whether they are connected to a vapor or liquid space.

7.2.10

Labels shall not be required to be on safety valves, liquid level gauging devices, and pressure gauges.

7.2.11

Each storage container shall be provided with a pressure gauge.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

22 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 23: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.3 Filler and Discharge Pipes and Manifolds.

7.3.1

Liquid manifold connections shall be located at nonadjacent ends of parallel rows of containers.

7.3.2*

In the design of the liquid piping system, shutoff or block valves shall be installed to limit the volume ofliquid that could be discharged in the vicinity of containers or important structures in the event of a liquidline failure.

7.3.2.1

Automatically or remotely controlled valves, or both, of the fail-safe type shall be used.

7.3.2.2

The mechanism for such valves shall be provided with a secondary control equipped with a fusible releasein accordance with 7.1.5 (1) that will cause the valve to close automatically in case of fire.

7.3.2.3

Fail-safe valves also shall be capable of being operated manually at the installed location.

7.3.2.4

A remote closing control shall be located so as to be accessible during a fire or other emergency.

7.3.2.5

Fail-safe valves shall be located to limit the volume between valves in aboveground piping systems to a

maximum of 500 gal (1.89 m3) of liquid where the piping system is within 300 ft (91.4 m) of anothercontainer, important building, or line of adjoining property that can be built upon.

7.4 Liquid Level Gauging Device.

7.4.1

Each nonrefrigerated storage container shall be equipped with an approved liquid level gauging device inaccordance with the following:

(1) If the liquid level gauging device is a float gauge or a pressure differential gauge, the container alsoshall be provided with an auxiliary gauging device, such as a fixed liquid level gauge, slip tube, rotarygauge, or similar device.

(2) Unlisted gauge glasses of the columnar type shall not be permitted.

7.4.2

All gauging devices shall be arranged so that the maximum liquid level to which the container can be filledfor butane, for a 50-50 mixture of butane and propane, and for propane is determinable.

7.4.3

Gauging devices that require bleeding of the product to the atmosphere, such as the rotary tube, fixedliquid level gauge, and slip tube, shall be designed so that the bleed valve maximum opening is not largerthan a No. 54 drill size [0.055 in. (1.4 mm)], unless provided with an excess-flow valve.

7.4.4

Gauging devices for containers shall have a maximum allowable working pressure at least equal to that ofthe containers to which they are attached.

7.4.5*

Where used, the length of a fixed liquid level gauge shall be designed to indicate the maximum level towhich the container can be filled for the product contained, based on the volume of the product at 40°F(4.4°C) at its maximum permitted filling density for aboveground containers and at 50°F (10°C) for buriedcontainers.

7.5 Hose Specifications for Nonrefrigerated LP-Gas.

7.5.1

Hose shall be fabricated of materials that are resistant to the action of LP-Gas and shall be approved.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

23 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 24: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.5.2

Hose, hose connections, and flexible connections shall comply with 7.5.2.1 and 7.5.2.2.

7.5.2.1

Hose shall be designed for a minimum bursting pressure of 1750 psi (12.1 MPa) [350 psi (2.41 MPa)working pressure] and shall be marked with “LP-Gas” or “LPG,” with the working pressure in psi marked atnot greater than 10 ft (3 m) intervals.

7.5.2.2

Hose assemblies, after the application of connections, shall have a design capability of withstanding apressure of not less than 700 psi (4.8 MPa).

7.5.2.3

Hose assemblies shall not be leak tested at pressures higher than the working pressure [350 psi (2.41MPa) minimum] of the hose.

7.6 Drips, Pits, and Drains.

7.6.1

Where vaporized gas can condense, means shall be provided for revaporization or disposal of thecondensate.

7.6.2

If pits are used, they shall be fitted with continuous automatic flammable vapor–detecting devicesequipped with an alarm.

7.6.3

No drains or blow-off lines shall be directed into or in proximity to sewer systems other than thosespecified in 7.6.2.

7.7 Pumps and Compressors.

7.7.1

Each pump and compressor shall be recommended by the manufacturer for the LP-Gas service intended.

7.7.2

Each pump and compressor shall be marked with its maximum working pressure.

7.8 Pumps and Compressors in Refrigerated LP-Gas Systems.

7.8.1

Refrigerated storage systems shall be provided with sufficient capacity to maintain containers at apressure not in excess of the operating pressure under design ambient conditions where the tank is sitedand shall be provided with additional capacity for filling or standby service.

7.8.2

Unless facilities are provided for the safe disposal of vented vapors while the refrigeration system isinoperative, at least two compressors shall be installed where compressors and condensers are used.

7.8.3

Compressor capacity provided for standby service shall be capable of handling the volume of vaporsnecessary to be evolved to maintain operating pressure.

7.8.4

Auxiliary equipment, such as fans, circulating water pumps, and instrument air compressors, shall beprovided with spare or standby facilities sufficient to ensure that prolonged failure of refrigeration can beprevented.

7.8.5

Means shall be available for operating equipment in the event of failure of normal facilities.

7.9 Protection of Container Accessories.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

24 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 25: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.9.1

Valves and regulating, gauging, and other container accessory equipment shall be protected againsttampering and physical damage, and where locks are used, they shall be of the frangible shank type.

7.9.2

All connections on underground containers shall be protected against vehicular damage or located so asnot to be subject to vehicular damage.

7.10 Transfer Equipment.

7.10.1

Pumps and compressors used for transferring LP-Gas shall be suitable for the product handled.

7.10.2

Two backflow check valves and a manually operated shutoff valve shall be installed in the fuel gas or inertgas line or system in series to prevent LP-Gas from flowing back into the fuel gas or inert gas line orsystem.

7.10.3

Isolation valving and bleed connections shall be provided at the loading or unloading manifold for bothliquid and vapor return lines so that hoses and arms can be blocked off, drained of liquid, and depressuredbefore disconnecting. Bleeds or vents shall discharge to a safe area.

7.10.4 Railroad Tank Car and Cargo Tank Vehicle Transfer Areas.

Transfer areas in new installations and all existing installations as of December 31, 2005, shall meet therequirements of 7.10.4.1 through 7.10.4.4 and 11.3.2 through Section 12.4.

7.10.4.1

Where a hose or swivel-type piping 1 1⁄2 in. (38 mm) or larger is used for liquid transfer or a 1 1⁄4 in. (32mm) or larger vapor hose or swivel-type piping is used for vapor transfer, the following requirements shallbe met:

(1) An emergency shutoff valve complying with 7.1.4 or a check valve with a metal-to-metal seat or aprimary resilient seat with a secondary metal seat not hinged with combustible metal shall be installedin the fixed piping of the transfer system within 20 ft (6.1 m) of lineal pipe from the nearest end of thehose or swivel-type piping to which the hose or swivel-type piping is connected.

(2) Where either a liquid or vapor line has two or more hose or swivel-type piping connectors of the sizesdesignated, an emergency shutoff valve or a backflow check valve shall be installed in each leg of thepiping.

7.10.4.2

Where a hose or swivel-type piping is used for loading or unloading railroad tank cars, it shall be protectedas follows:

(1) An emergency shutoff valve shall be installed at the tank car end of the hose or swivel-type pipingwhere flow into or out of the tank car is possible.

(2) An emergency shutoff valve or a check valve with a metal-to-metal seat or a primary resilient seatwith a secondary metal seat not hinged with combustible material shall be installed on the tank carend of the hose or swivel piping where flow is only into the tank car.

7.10.4.3*

The emergency shutoff valve(s) or backflow check valve(s) specified in 7.10.4.1 shall be installed in theplant piping so that any break resulting from a pull will occur on the hose or swivel-type piping side of theconnection while retaining intact the valves and piping on the plant side of the connection.

Exception: Such anchorage shall not be required for the tank car side.

7.10.4.4

All new and existing installations shall have at least two clearly identified and easily accessible manuallyoperated remote emergency shutoff devices. One shutoff device shall be located not less than 20 ft (6.1 m)nor more than 100 ft (30.5 m) in the path of egress from the emergency shutoff valve.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

25 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 26: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.10.5

The track of tank car siding shall be relatively level.

7.10.6

The cargo tank vehicle transfer area shall be relatively level.

7.10.7

A cargo tank vehicle transfer area shall be of sufficient size to accommodate the vehicles withoutexcessive movement or turning. Cargo tank vehicles that unload into or load from storage containers shallbe at least 25 ft (7.6 m) from the container and positioned so that the shutoff valves on both the truckcargo tank vehicle and the transfer station are readily accessible.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 25 proposed editing the section 7 heading by adding Process Pressure Vessels to the list along with PI 26 proposed text for 7.9 detailing the minimum requirements for process pressure vessels. Additionally PI 16 was resolved which proposed an appropriate definition of a process pressure Vessel for section 3.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider editing the section 7 heading and add the text listing process pressure vessel requirements, and the process pressure vessel definition to the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 25, PI 26, and PI 16. The standard as written today does not address requirements for process vessels which are often confused with non-refrigerated containers used to store LPG. LP-Gas plants that produce propane-air mixtures utilize process pressure vessels in the process as separators, filters, etc. which clearly do not store liquefied petroleum gas and as such should be designed and constructed in accordance with the ASME BPVC for its designed purpose and not to a specification for a vessel designed to store the LPG liquid.

Related Item

Public Input No. 25-NFPA 59-2015 [Chapter 7 [Title Only]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 10:16:15 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected

Resolution: Reject but see related Second Revision 15.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

26 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 27: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 59-2016 [ Chapter 7 ]

Chapter 7 Piping, Valves, and Equipment

7.1 General.

7.1.1

Piping, valves, and equipment shall be suitable for LP-Gas service at the minimum design temperatureand the maximum design pressure.

7.1.1.1

The design and fabrication of process piping systems shall be in accordance with ASME B31.3, ProcessPiping, except as modified by the provisions of this chapter and any applicable federal pipeline regulations.

7.1.1.2

Pressure-containing metal parts of equipment for application temperatures of –20°F (–29°C) or above shallbe fabricated of one of the following materials:

(1) Steel

(2) Ductile (nodular) iron in accordance with ASTM A395/A395M, Specification for Ferritic Ductile IronPressure-Retaining Castings for Use at Elevated Temperatures, or malleable iron in accordance withASTM A536, Specifications for Ductile Iron Castings, Grade 60-40-18 or 65-45-12

(3) Malleable iron in accordance with ASTM A47/A47M, Standard Specification for Ferritic Malleable IronCastings; brass; bronze; or equivalent copper alloys

7.1.1.3

Piping that can contain liquid LP-Gas, that can be isolated by valving, and that requires hydrostatic reliefvalves, as specified in Section 10.8, shall have as a minimum a design pressure of 350 psi (2400 kPa) orthe maximum discharge pressure of any pump or other source feeding that piping system, whichever isgreater.

7.1.1.4

The piping specified in 7.1.1.3 shall be subjected to a pressure test, in accordance with 7.1.1.1, of no lessthan 150 percent of the design pressure.

7.1.2

Piping connections to the container for sizes over 2 in. (5 cm) nominal pipe diameter excluding excess-flowvalves shall be made by welding or with welded flanges.

7.1.3

Cast-iron valves, pipe, and fittings shall not be used in piping that carries LP-Gas and LP-Gas–airmixtures, except for container valves or fittings made of malleable or ductile iron used within the limitationsset forth in 323.4.2 of ASME B31.3, Process Piping.

7.1.4

Emergency shutoff valves shall be approved and shall incorporate all of the following means of closing:

(1) Automatic shutoff through thermal (fire) actuation

(2) Manual shutoff from two or more remote locations

(3) Manual shutoff at the installed location

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

27 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 28: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.1.5

Fusible elements used for closing emergency shutoff valves shall meet the following requirements:

(1) The melting point shall not exceed 250°F (121°C).

(2) The element shall be connected to actuate the valve.

(3) The element shall not be more than 5 ft (1.5 m) from the nearest end of the hose or swivel-type pipingconnected to the line in which the valve is installed.

7.1.6

Gaskets used to retain LP-Gas in flanged connections shall be resistant to the action of LP-Gas.

7.1.7

Gaskets used to retain LP-Gas in flanged connections shall be either:

(1) Made of metal or other material that is confined in metal that has a melting point over 1500°F (816°C)or protected against fire exposure, or

(2) Nonmetallic or electrically insulating where electrical insulating fittings are required

7.1.8

Gaskets used to retain LP-Gas in flanged connections shall be replaced when a flange is opened.

7.1.9

All piping, tubing, fittings, and valves shall be leak tested after assembly and proved to be free of leaks atnot less than normal operating pressures. Tests shall not be made with a flame.

7.1.10*

Piping systems including interconnecting of permanently installed containers shall compensate forexpansion, contraction, jarring, vibration, and settling.

7.1.10.1

The use of metallic flexible connectors shall be permitted.

7.1.10.2

The use of nonmetallic pipe, tubing, or hose for permanently interconnecting containers shall beprohibited.

7.1.11

Piping shall be supported and protected against physical damage and corrosion.

7.1.12

Underground and submerged piping shall be protected and maintained as required in Section 12.3.

7.2 Container Valves and Accessories.

7.2.1

All shutoff valves and accessory equipment (liquid or gas) shall be compatible with LP-Gas and designedfor not less than the maximum extreme pressure and temperature to which they can be subjected.

7.2.1.1

Valves for use with nonrefrigerated containers that can be subjected to container pressure shall have arated working pressure of at least 250 psi (1.7 MPa).

7.2.1.2

Cast-iron valves, piping, and fittings shall be prohibited on LP-Gas containers and their connections exceptfor container valves or fittings that are made of malleable or ductile iron.

7.2.2

All piping connections to containers shall have shutoff valves located as close to the container aspractical.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

28 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 29: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.2.2.1

The valves shall be accessible for operation and maintenance under normal and emergency conditions,either by location or by means of permanently installed special provisions.

7.2.2.2

Valves installed in unobstructed locations that are not more than 6 ft (1.8 m) above ground level shall beconsidered accessible.

7.2.2.3

Stairs, ladders, platforms, remote operators, extension handles, and so forth, shall be installed wherevalves are located 6 ft (1.8 m) or more above ground level.

7.2.2.4

Safety relief connections, liquid level gauging devices, and plugged openings shall not be required to beaccessible.

7.2.3

Excess-flow valves, where required by this code, shall close automatically and shall be selected andinstalled for rated closing flows based on process requirements.

7.2.4

The connections or lines, including valves, fittings, and so forth, downstream of an excess-flow valve shallhave a greater capacity than the rated flow of the excess-flow valve.

7.2.5

All liquid and vapor connections on containers, other than pressure relief valves, liquid level gaugingdevices, and openings not larger than No. 54 drill size [0.055 in. (1.4 mm)], as covered in 7.2.6 and 7.4.3,shall be equipped with one of the following:

(1) A back-pressure check valve and either a manual valve or an emergency shutoff valve

(2) An excess-flow valve with a fail-closed hydraulic or pneumatically actuated valve in compliance withAPI 607, Fire Test for Soft-Seated Quarter-Turn Valves; API 6FA, Specifications for Fire Tests forValves; or the equivalent, equipped for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire)actuation where the thermal element is installed in compliance with 7.1.5

(3) A quick-acting internal valve incorporating the means of closing specified in 7.1.4

7.2.6

Openings from a container or through fittings attached directly on the container to which pressure gaugeconnection is made shall not be required to be equipped with an excess-flow valve if such openings arenot larger than a No. 54 drill size [0.055 in. (1.4 mm)].

7.2.7

Excess-flow and back-pressure check valves, where required by this standard, shall be located inside thecontainer or at a point outside where the line enters the container. In the latter case, installation shall bemade in such a manner that any stress beyond the excess-flow or back-pressure check valve will notcause breakage between the container and such valve.

7.2.8

Excess-flow valves shall be designed with a bypass, not to exceed a No. 60 drill size [0.040 in. (1.02 mm)]opening, to allow equalization of pressures.

7.2.9

All inlet and outlet connections on any container shall be labeled or color coded, or valves connected tothe connections shall be labeled to designate whether they are connected to a vapor or liquid space.

7.2.10

Labels shall not be required to be on safety valves, liquid level gauging devices, and pressure gauges.

7.2.11

Each storage container shall be provided with a pressure gauge.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

29 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 30: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.3 Filler and Discharge Pipes and Manifolds.

7.3.1

Liquid manifold connections shall be located at nonadjacent ends of parallel rows of containers.

7.3.2*

In the design of the liquid piping system, shutoff or block valves shall be installed to limit the volume ofliquid that could be discharged in the vicinity of containers or important structures in the event of a liquidline failure.

7.3.2.1

Automatically or remotely controlled valves, or both, of the fail-safe type shall be used.

7.3.2.2

The mechanism for such valves shall be provided with a secondary control equipped with a fusible releasein accordance with 7.1.5 (1) that will cause the valve to close automatically in case of fire.

7.3.2.3

Fail-safe valves also shall be capable of being operated manually at the installed location.

7.3.2.4

A remote closing control shall be located so as to be accessible during a fire or other emergency.

7.3.2.5

Fail-safe valves shall be located to limit the volume between valves in aboveground piping systems to a

maximum of 500 gal (1.89 m3) of liquid where the piping system is within 300 ft (91.4 m) of anothercontainer, important building, or line of adjoining property that can be built upon.

7.4 Liquid Level Gauging Device.

7.4.1

Each nonrefrigerated storage container shall be equipped with an approved liquid level gauging device inaccordance with the following:

(1) If the liquid level gauging device is a float gauge or a pressure differential gauge, the container alsoshall be provided with an auxiliary gauging device, such as a fixed liquid level gauge, slip tube, rotarygauge, or similar device.

(2) Unlisted gauge glasses of the columnar type shall not be permitted.

7.4.2

All gauging devices shall be arranged so that the maximum liquid level to which the container can be filledfor butane, for a 50-50 mixture of butane and propane, and for propane is determinable.

7.4.3

Gauging devices that require bleeding of the product to the atmosphere, such as the rotary tube, fixedliquid level gauge, and slip tube, shall be designed so that the bleed valve maximum opening is not largerthan a No. 54 drill size [0.055 in. (1.4 mm)], unless provided with an excess-flow valve.

7.4.4

Gauging devices for containers shall have a maximum allowable working pressure at least equal to that ofthe containers to which they are attached.

7.4.5*

Where used, the length of a fixed liquid level gauge shall be designed to indicate the maximum level towhich the container can be filled for the product contained, based on the volume of the product at 40°F(4.4°C) at its maximum permitted filling density for aboveground containers and at 50°F (10°C) for buriedcontainers.

7.5 Hose Specifications for Nonrefrigerated LP-Gas.

7.5.1

Hose shall be fabricated of materials that are resistant to the action of LP-Gas and shall be approved.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

30 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 31: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.5.2

Hose, hose connections, and flexible connections shall comply with 7.5.2.1 and 7.5.2.2.

7.5.2.1

Hose shall be designed for a minimum bursting pressure of 1750 psi (12.1 MPa) [350 psi (2.41 MPa)working pressure] and shall be marked with “LP-Gas” or “LPG,” with the working pressure in psi marked atnot greater than 10 ft (3 m) intervals.

7.5.2.2

Hose assemblies, after the application of connections, shall have a design capability of withstanding apressure of not less than 700 psi (4.8 MPa).

7.5.2.3

Hose assemblies shall not be leak tested at pressures higher than the working pressure [350 psi (2.41MPa) minimum] of the hose.

7.6 Drips, Pits, and Drains.

7.6.1

Where vaporized gas can condense, means shall be provided for revaporization or disposal of thecondensate.

7.6.2

If pits are used, they shall be fitted with continuous automatic flammable vapor–detecting devicesequipped with an alarm.

7.6.3

No drains or blow-off lines shall be directed into or in proximity to sewer systems other than thosespecified in 7.6.2.

7.7 Pumps and Compressors.

7.7.1

Each pump and compressor shall be recommended by the manufacturer for the LP-Gas service intended.

7.7.2

Each pump and compressor shall be marked with its maximum working pressure.

7.8 Pumps and Compressors in Refrigerated LP-Gas Systems.

7.8.1

Refrigerated storage systems shall be provided with sufficient capacity to maintain containers at apressure not in excess of the operating pressure under design ambient conditions where the tank is sitedand shall be provided with additional capacity for filling or standby service.

7.8.2

Unless facilities are provided for the safe disposal of vented vapors while the refrigeration system isinoperative, at least two compressors shall be installed where compressors and condensers are used.

7.8.3

Compressor capacity provided for standby service shall be capable of handling the volume of vaporsnecessary to be evolved to maintain operating pressure.

7.8.4

Auxiliary equipment, such as fans, circulating water pumps, and instrument air compressors, shall beprovided with spare or standby facilities sufficient to ensure that prolonged failure of refrigeration can beprevented.

7.8.5

Means shall be available for operating equipment in the event of failure of normal facilities.

7.9 Protection of Container Accessories.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

31 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 32: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.9.1

Valves and regulating, gauging, and other container accessory equipment shall be protected againsttampering and physical damage, and where locks are used, they shall be of the frangible shank type.

7.9.2

All connections on underground containers shall be protected against vehicular damage or located so asnot to be subject to vehicular damage.

7.10 Transfer Equipment.

7.10.1

Pumps and compressors used for transferring LP-Gas shall be suitable for the product handled.

7.10.2

Two backflow check valves and a manually operated shutoff valve shall be installed in the fuel gas or inertgas line or system in series to prevent LP-Gas from flowing back into the fuel gas or inert gas line orsystem.

7.10.3

Isolation valving and bleed connections shall be provided at the loading or unloading manifold for bothliquid and vapor return lines so that hoses and arms can be blocked off, drained of liquid, and depressuredbefore disconnecting. Bleeds or vents shall discharge to a safe area.

7.10.4 Railroad Tank Car and Cargo Tank Vehicle Transfer Areas.

Transfer areas in new installations and all existing installations as of December 31, 2005, shall meet therequirements of 7.10.4.1 through 7.10.4.4 and 11.3.2 through Section 12.4.

7.10.4.1

Where a hose or swivel-type piping 1 1⁄2 in. (38 mm) or larger is used for liquid transfer or a 1 1⁄4 in. (32mm) or larger vapor hose or swivel-type piping is used for vapor transfer, the following requirements shallbe met:

(1) An emergency shutoff valve complying with 7.1.4 or a check valve with a metal-to-metal seat or aprimary resilient seat with a secondary metal seat not hinged with combustible metal shall be installedin the fixed piping of the transfer system within 20 ft (6.1 m) of lineal pipe from the nearest end of thehose or swivel-type piping to which the hose or swivel-type piping is connected.

(2) Where either a liquid or vapor line has two or more hose or swivel-type piping connectors of the sizesdesignated, an emergency shutoff valve or a backflow check valve shall be installed in each leg of thepiping.

7.10.4.2

Where a hose or swivel-type piping is used for loading or unloading railroad tank cars, it shall be protectedas follows:

(1) An emergency shutoff valve shall be installed at the tank car end of the hose or swivel-type pipingwhere flow into or out of the tank car is possible.

(2) An emergency shutoff valve or a check valve with a metal-to-metal seat or a primary resilient seatwith a secondary metal seat not hinged with combustible material shall be installed on the tank carend of the hose or swivel piping where flow is only into the tank car.

7.10.4.3*

The emergency shutoff valve(s) or backflow check valve(s) specified in 7.10.4.1 shall be installed in theplant piping so that any break resulting from a pull will occur on the hose or swivel-type piping side of theconnection while retaining intact the valves and piping on the plant side of the connection.

Exception: Such anchorage shall not be required for the tank car side.

7.10.4.4

All new and existing installations shall have at least two clearly identified and easily accessible manuallyoperated remote emergency shutoff devices. One shutoff device shall be located not less than 20 ft (6.1 m)nor more than 100 ft (30.5 m) in the path of egress from the emergency shutoff valve.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

32 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 33: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

7.10.5

The track of tank car siding shall be relatively level.

7.10.6

The cargo tank vehicle transfer area shall be relatively level.

7.10.7

A cargo tank vehicle transfer area shall be of sufficient size to accommodate the vehicles withoutexcessive movement or turning. Cargo tank vehicles that unload into or load from storage containers shallbe at least 25 ft (7.6 m) from the container and positioned so that the shutoff valves on both the truckcargo tank vehicle and the transfer station are readily accessible.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• Resolved PI 25 proposed editing the section 7 heading by adding Process Pressure Vessels to the list along with PI 26 proposed text for 7.9 detailing the minimum requirements for process pressure vessels. Additionally PI 16 was resolved which proposed an appropriate definition of a process pressure Vessel for section 3.

Comment:• The AGA requests the Technical Committee to reconsider editing the section 7 heading and add the text listing process pressure vessel requirements, and the process pressure vessel definition to the standard as previously proposed in PI’s 25, PI 26, and PI 16. The standard as written today does not address requirements for process vessels which are often confused with non-refrigerated containers used to store LPG. LP-Gas plants that produce propane-air mixtures utilize process pressure vessels in the process as separators, filters, etc. which clearly do not store liquefied petroleum gas and as such should be designed and constructed in accordance with the ASME BPVC for its designed purpose and not to a specification for a vessel designed to store the LPG liquid.

Related Item

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after 7.8.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 10:18:13 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected

Resolution: Reject but see related Second Revision 14.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

33 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 34: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 7.1.2 ]

7.1.1.5

A) New or replaced buried flammable liquid or gas piping operated below 20% of the pipes SpecifiedMinimum Yield Strength (SMYS) within the scope of this standard shall be installed with a minimum of 24inches of cover in normal soil and a minimum of 18 inches in consolidated rock condition.

B) New or replaced buried flammable liquid or gas piping operated above 20% of the pipes SpecifiedMinimum Yield Strength (SMYS) within the scope of this standard shall be installed with a minimum of 30inches of cover in normal soil and a minimum of 18 inches in consolidated rock condition.

C) Where piping was buried prior to the above requirements, the buried piping shall be retroactivelyidentified with field installed markers on each side of across roadways, paths, or areas where vehicular orconstruction equipment traffic might travel over the pipe.

a. Where heavy vehicle /construction equipment traffic is anticipated, additionalprecautions shall be taken (for example – plating/mating) to protect the pip from damage

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Resolved PI 28 proposed adding verbiage to section 7 to require the same requirements for depth of cover over buried gas mains pipelines as Part 192.327 requires. There are current requirements in CFR 49 Part 192 for transmission gas pipelines, distribution gas mains and services minimize risk of damage to pipes from vehicle traffic or heavy equipment traffic. Damage of this type to buried pipelines is not readily apparent when the occurrence happens, but can have catastrophic consequences at some time after the damage takes place. Remaining silent on this issue does not exempt facilities from enforcement of Part 192.327 requirements as they are not in conflict with NFPA 59 requirements and there for Part 192 can be enforced. It is more appropriate for the NFPA 59 Standard to state the requirements for the safety of the piping and align with Part 192 minimum pipeline safety requirements. The AGA requests the Technical Committee to consider adding the above slightly revised text from the original PI 28 for the depth of cover and clearance verbiage to the standard for areas where heavy vehicle traffic occurs, or where heavy construction equipment will cross over the pipeline within the Utility Gas Plant.

Related Item

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after 7.1.1.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:16:10 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-17-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: Resolved PI 28 proposed adding verbiage to section 7 to require the same requirements for depth ofcover over buried gas mains pipelines as Part 192.327 requires. There are current requirements inCFR 49 Part 192 for transmission gas pipelines, distribution gas mains and services minimize risk of

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

34 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 35: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

damage to pipes from vehicle traffic or heavy equipment traffic. Damage of this type to buriedpipelines is not readily apparent when the occurrence happens, but can have catastrophicconsequences at some time after the damage takes place. Remaining silent on this issue does notexempt facilities from enforcement of Part 192.327 requirements as they are not in conflict withNFPA 59 requirements and there for Part 192 can be enforced. It is more appropriate for the NFPA59 Standard to state the requirements for the safety of the piping and align with Part 192 minimumpipeline safety requirements.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

35 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 36: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 3-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after 7.1.2 ]

7.1.1.6

A) New or replaced buried flammable liquid or gas piping operated above 20% of the pipes SpecifiedMinimum Yield Strength (SMYS) within the scope of this standard shall be installed with a minimum of 12inches clearance from any other structure not associated with the piping.

B) New or replaced buried flammable liquid or gas piping operated below 20% of the pipes SpecifiedMinimum Yield Strength (SMYS) within the scope of this standard shall be installed with enough clearancefrom any other underground structure to allow proper maintenance and to protect against damage thatmight result from the pipes proximity to the other structures.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Resolved PI 29 proposed adding verbiage to section 7 to require the same requirements for clearance around buried gas pipelines as Part 192.325 requires. These are current requirements in CFR 49 Part 192 for transmission gas pipelines, distribution gas mains and services to allow proper maintenance activities to be performed. Remaining silent on this issue does not exempt facilities from enforcement of Part 192.325 requirements as they are not in conflict with NFPA 59 requirements and there for Part 192 can be enforced. It is more appropriate for the NFPA 59 Standard to state the requirements for the safety of the piping and align with Part 192 minimum pipeline safety requirements. The AGA requests the Technical Committee to consider adding the above slightly revised text from the original PI 29 for clearances.

Related Item

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after 7.1.1.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:20:40 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-18-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: Resolved PI 29 proposed adding verbiage to section 7 to require the same requirements forclearance around buried gas pipelines as Part 192.325 requires. These are current requirements inCFR 49 Part 192 for transmission gas pipelines, distribution gas mains and services to allow propermaintenance activities to be performed. Remaining silent on this issue does not exempt facilitiesfrom enforcement of Part 192.325 requirements as they are not in conflict with NFPA 59requirements and therefor Part 192 can be enforced. It is more appropriate for NFPA 59 to state therequirements for the safety of the piping and align with Part 192 minimum pipeline safetyrequirements.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

36 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 37: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. 7.10.4.4 ]

7.10.4.4

All new installations and, by December 31, 2005, all existing installations shall have at least two clearlyidentified and easily accessible manually operated remote emergency shutoff devices. One shutoff deviceshall be located not less than 20 ft (6.1 m) nor more than 100 ft (30.5 m) in the path of egress from theemergency shutoff valve.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Restore the text removed by the first revision.

There are several retroactive requirements which appear in the code. A consistent and logical method to address them should be chosen and applied to all references rather than treating each one differently. Allowing the date to remain in the text until then will cause no harm.

Related Item

First Revision No. 6-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. 7.10.4.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Michael Osmundson

Organization: Lexicon Propane Group

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 14:12:29 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-19-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: Restore the text removed by the first revision.

There are several retroactive requirements which appear in the code. A consistent and logicalmethod to address them should be chosen and applied to all references rather than treating eachone differently. Allowing the date to remain in the text until then will cause no harm.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

37 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 38: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 4-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. 10.2.3 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

38 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 39: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

10.2.3

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

39 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 40: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

The minimum rate of discharge of pressure relief valves installed in ASME containers shall be inaccordance with Table 10.2.3 or shall be calculated using the following formula:

[10.2.3]

where:

F = minimum flow rate (SCFM air)

A = total outside surface area of container (ft2)

[58:5.9.2.6]

Table 10.2.3 Minimum Required Rate of Discharge in Cubic Feet per Minute of Air at 120 Percent of theMaximum Permitted Start-to-Discharge Pressure for Safety Relief Devices to Be Used on NonrefrigeratedContainers as a Function of Container Surface Area*

Surface Area (ft2)Flow Rate

(SCFM)Surface Area (ft2)

Flow Rate

(SCFM)Surface Area (ft2)

Flow Rate

(SCFM)

≤20 626 170 3620 600 10,170

25 751 175 3700 650 10,860

30 872 180 3790 700 11,550

35 990 185 3880 750 12,220

40 1100 190 3960 800 12,880

45 1220 195 4050 850 13,540

50 1330 200 4130 900 14,190

55 1430 210 4300 950 14,830

60 1540 220 4470 1000 15,470

65 1640 230 4630 1050 16,100

70 1750 240 4800 1100 16,720

75 1850 250 4960 1150 17,350

80 1950 260 5130 1200 17,960

85 2050 270 5290 1250 18,570

90 2150 280 5450 1300 19,180

95 2240 290 5610 1350 19,780

100 2340 300 5760 1400 20,380

105 2440 310 5920 1450 20,980

110 2530 320 6080 1500 21,570

115 2630 330 6230 1550 22,160

120 2720 340 6390 1600 22,740

125 2810 350 6540 1650 23,320

130 2900 360 6690 1700 23,900

135 2990 370 6840 1750 24,470

140 3080 380 7000 1800 25,050

145 3170 390 7150 1850 25,620

150 3260 400 7300 1900 26,180

155 3350 450 8040 1950 26,750

160 3440 500 8760 2000 27,310

165 3530 550 9470 — —

*This table is only applicable to containers holding propane with a maximum pressure of 300 psi or less orbutane with a maximum pressure of 250 psi or less.

For SI units: 1 SCFM = 0.0283 m3/min, 1 psi (gauge) = 6.9 kPa (gauge).

Note: Flow rate in SCFM air.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

40 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 41: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

• FR-40 Section No. 10.2.3 which passed ballot should be overturned and revert back to the 2015 text as the text that was struck as a result removed important relief valve sizing criteria added during the standards revision cycle, which lead to the issue of the 2015 edition. Comment:• An additional factor in overturning this FR-40 is that the NFPA 59 Technical Committee was not provided an opportunity review this action during the First Draft meeting. This FR was established after the October First Draft meeting by NFPA staff in an exercise to update text in NFPA 59 extracted from NFPA 58. The NFPA 58 document was not edited to align with the changes in NFPA 59 2015 edition and there for when NFPA staff entered this as a FR without permitting the Technical Committee the opportunity to review it had unintended consequences which were not picked up by the Technical Committee during the balloting process of the FR’s which took place some 3 months after the Technical Committee First Revision meeting. Please also note that NFPA communicated with the NFPA 59 Technical Committee on 2/9/2016 during the balloting window to alert them of the potential of unintended consequence.

• AGA does not feel the Technical Committee made an informed decision when passing FR-40 and there for FR-40 should be revisited and overturned and revert to the 2015 text. AGA would also ask that the Technical Committee consider deleting the NFPA 58 extraction at 10.2.3 in NFPA 59 to prevent reoccurrence of this specific issue. AGA will also ask NFPA to evaluate the practice of NFPA staff adding FR’s addressing extracted text with the extraction related FR going through the standards process allowing the Technical Committee the opportunity to determine of it is appropriate to use the extracted text.

Related Item

First Revision No. 40-NFPA 59-2016 [Section No. 10.2.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kofi Woodley

Organization: American Gas Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 09 09:23:50 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-20-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: FR-40 Section No. 10.2.3 which passed ballot should be overturned and revert back to the 2015text as the text that was struck as a result removed important relief valve sizing criteria addedduring the standards revision cycle, which lead to the issuance of the 2015 edition.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

41 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 42: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. 13.2.4 ]

13.2.4 *

Where utilized, leak detection shall be permitted to be used in addition to, but not in lieu of, gas detection.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Reverse the Technical Committee's action taken at the first draft meeting and remove this text.

The Public Input which initiated this addition refers to action taken by 59A, but 59A has not adopted a similar section. The original issue in 59A was whether to wire an RTD (temperature) sensor into a fire detection system or a gas detection system. The action adopted for 59A was a new section: 12.4.4 Leak detection. Leak detection shall activate an audible and visual alarm at the plant site and at a constantly attended location if the plant is not continuously attended.

No other technical justification has been submitted for this change.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 59-2016 [Section No. A.13.2.4]

Related Item

First Revision No. 33-NFPA 59-2015 [Detail]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Michael Osmundson

Organization: Lexicon Propane Group

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 13:55:10 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-21-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: The Public Input which initiated this addition refers to action taken by 59A, but 59A has not adopteda similar section. The original issue in 59A was whether to wire an RTD (temperature) sensor into afire detection system or a gas detection system. The action adopted for 59A was a new section:12.4.4 Leak detection. Leak detection shall activate an audible and visual alarm at the plant site andat a constantly attended location if the plant is not continuously attended.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

42 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 43: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. A.4.5.2.2 ]

A.4.5.2.2

When classifying the extent of hazardous area, consideration should be given to possible variations in thespotting of railroad tank cars and cargo tank vehicles at the unloading points and the effect these variationsof actual spotting point can have on the point of connection.

Where specified for the prevention of fire or explosion during normal operation, ventilation is consideredadequate where provided in accordance with the provisions of this code.

See Figure A.4.5.2.2.

Figure A.4.5.2.2 Extent of Electrically Classified Area. (See Table 4.5.2.2.) [58:Figure A.6.23.2.3]

When classifying the extent of an entire facility or a specific portion of the facility, consideration should begiven to increasing the extent of the hazardous area location above those stated in NFPA 70 ( NEC ) andTable 4.5.2.2 in NFPA 59 based on higher flow rates and pressures utilized within larger facilities.Additional guidance for extending electrical area classifications can be found in NFPA 497.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The Public Input to add this text to the body of the code was rejected by the Technical Committee in the first draft meeting. Therefore, the Annex material should be deleted.

Related Item

Public Input No. 53-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after A.4.5.2.2]

First Revision No. 34-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. A.4.5.2.2]

First Revision No. 34-NFPA 59-2015 [Section No. A.4.5.2.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Michael Osmundson

Organization: Lexicon Propane Group

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 13:46:01 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

43 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 44: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Committee Action: Rejected

Resolution: The proposed text being stricken is still relevant to hazardous area classification.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

44 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 45: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. A.10.1 ]

A.10.1

Dilution effects from relief valves releasing hydrocarbon gases can vary dramatically depending on whetherthe product released is vapor, mist or liquid. Based on information in ANSI/API 521, Guide for Pressure-

RelievingRelieving and Depressuring Systems , safety relieve valves that are in liquid service when relieving do notentrain sufficient volumes of air to dilute the mixture to below LEL levels.

Additional factors should be considered when establishing the electrical area classification and classificationdistances near relief valves in liquid service.Experience has indicated that

In contrast, for safety relief valves in vapor service only and those safety relief valves that emit a mist, avertical and unimpeded vent of high-velocity hydrocarbon gases will entrain sufficient air within a very shortdistance so that the resultant plume will be diluted below the lower flammable limit.

This behavior is documented in ANSI/API 521. This document was based, in part, on an API-commissionedstudy by Battelle Memorial Institute, “The Effect of Velocity, Temperature, and Gas Molecular Weight onFlammability Limits in Wind-Blown Jets of Hydrocarbon Gases.”

These reports clearly indicate that a vertical and unimpeded jet from a safety relief valve in vapor serviceonly and safety relief valves that emit a mist will be diluted below its lower flammable limit within 50 pipediameters of the issuing jet and that the effects of “wind-tilt” can be safely neglected if a 50 ft (15 m)horizontal clearance is provided between the jet and a source of ignition. A high velocity jet is defined as a jethaving an exit velocity in excess of 100 ft/sec (30.5 m/sec), which is slightly more than an order of magnitudeless than the acoustic velocity that can be anticipated at the throat of an operating relief valve. ANSI/API 521also indicates that a partially open relief valve in vapor service will produce a velocity sufficient to achieve thenecessary dilution.

Once such a mixture from a safety relief valve in vapor service only and those that emit a mist has beendiluted below its flammable limit, there are no known natural forces (including gravitational forces) that willcause the reconcentration of the LP-Gases so as to create a flammable cloud. The application of water, aseither a fog or a heavy stream, will not hasten and can actually inhibit the dilution of the jet stream. It isrecommended that this information be included in any emergency procedure manual and that the respondingemergency services be made aware of this information.

These additional factors should be considered when establishing the electrical area classification andclassification distances near relief valves in liquid service.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The revised text accepted by the TC at the first draft meeting makes subtle changes to text which has been unchanged for many years. Many readers will likely skim over the new text and assume it matches their recollection of the previous version. A dramatically re-written section can provide the same information and highlight the new information.

Related Item

First Revision No. 16-NFPA 59-2015 [Sections A.10.1, A.11.2.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Michael Osmundson

Organization: Lexicon Propane Group

Street Address:

City:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

45 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 46: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 13:05:47 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-23-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: The revised text accepted by the TC at the first draft meeting makes subtle changes to text whichhas been unchanged for many years. Many readers will likely skim over the new text and assume itmatches their recollection of the previous version. A dramatically re-written section can provide thesame information and highlight the new information.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

46 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM

Page 47: Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 [ New Section after … · Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 59-2016 ... American Gas Association Street Address: ... Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 59-2016

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 59-2016 [ Section No. A.13.2.4 ]

A.13.2.4

Types of leak detection used to complement gas detection systems might include acoustic (ultrasonic),which detects small leak rates (mass/time); vapor cloud video surveillance cameras, which detect gascloud size; low temperature detectors, including resistance temperature detectors (RTD); and linear leakdetection, such as fiber-optic leak detection technology.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

If the related text in the body of the code is removed, the annex material should be removed as well.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 59-2016 [Section No. 13.2.4]

Related Item

Public Input No. 46-NFPA 59-2015 [New Section after 13.2.3]

First Revision No. 33-NFPA 59-2015 [Detail]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Michael Osmundson

Organization: Lexicon Propane Group

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 14:03:46 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted

Resolution: SR-22-NFPA 59-2016

Statement: The body text was removed, therefore the annex text should also be removed.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

47 of 47 11/15/2016 1:28 PM