Psychrehabcrater

68
How to Lessen the Effect of TBI in Returning Soldiers or Civilians Helping the Person with Neurological Impairment Re- invent Themselves?

description

Different types of compensation strategies for post TBI rehab.

Transcript of Psychrehabcrater

Page 1: Psychrehabcrater

How to Lessen the Effect of TBI in Returning Soldiers or Civilians

Helping the Person with Neurological Impairment Re-invent Themselves?

Page 2: Psychrehabcrater

The CRATER Model of

Psychotherapy for Persons with

Neurological Impairment has 4 areas of

modification of your current technique

Page 3: Psychrehabcrater

1. Tie the performance of Cognitive Strategies or regular re-occurring tasks to physiological events

such as rise time, sleep time, meal time

to lower the burden on the client’s memory.

Page 4: Psychrehabcrater

2. Understand the catastrophic reaction:

what do they look like when cognitively overloaded.– tie the performance of the cognitive strategy

to the catastrophic reaction.

– pick up the catastrophic reaction earlier.

Page 5: Psychrehabcrater

3. Externalize the problem and use triangulation-

Therapist, Client and Family allied against

Demon Brain Injury

Page 6: Psychrehabcrater

4. Change the source of self-esteem from

personal best and a competition model to a

resilience coping model

Page 7: Psychrehabcrater

• Become aware of neuropsychological symptoms that are influencing social interactions- and what to do about them.

Page 8: Psychrehabcrater

How to modify your techniques?By presenting a theory, a method, of imbedding cognitive retraining in

individual psychotherapy having the following characteristics:

1. Pick cognitive symptomatology which is most likely to elicit stimulus overload in the patient.

2. If present, always address fatigue first.

3. Address any cognitive deficits that lead to catastrophic reactions second.

4. Link the performance of verbal cognitive constructs to either dysphoric affect (the catastrophic reaction) or a physiological response to effect generalization in the community.

5. Pick additional cognitive constructs to be retrained based on upstream/downstream Lurian brain organization –

or“Where in the continuum of a cognitive domain does breakdown

occur?”

Page 9: Psychrehabcrater

Here it is another way: What

What needs a cognitive strategy? What needs to be compensated for :

First, on what gives the patient the most frequent grief based on symptomatology of neurological insult

1. fatigue and

2. being overwhelmed with information coming too quickly, slowed information processing, leading to dysphoric affect (catastrophic

reaction, i.e. anger, tears, flight, freezing, confusion, helpless laughter).

Secondly, link the performance of a compensation or device use to either:

1. dysphoric affect (catastrophic reaction) or 2. a physiological response to increase generalization

Page 10: Psychrehabcrater

How

– Externalizes the symptom as belonging to the neurological insult (Demon Brain Injury).

– Recognize anger at loss is not pathological, but useful if directed properly-at the neurological insult.

– Re-defines the person’s source of self esteem from “ I am the fastest, best, brightest, the most competitive winner.” to “I use my cognitive compensation whenever needed, I cope most effectively.”

Page 11: Psychrehabcrater

How continued – re-direct the anger constantly to the externalized neurological insult,

• give a new framework for self-esteem with performing the cognitive strategy as the core strategy for coping

• Stress the alliance of the patient/family/therapist/team against the neurological insult (triangulation)

• Pace the learning of cognitive constructs to the patient’s new learning/memory/attention characteristics-always slower

• Share the cognitive strategy with team members, family members and have everyone practice it together.

Page 12: Psychrehabcrater

Don’ts1. Don’t blame the patient for lack of motivation when cognitive

retraining/therapy isn’t being successful. Assume that you have entered the cognitive continuum at the wrong point and correct.

1. Don’t assume that the Device is the therapeutic agent of change.

3. Understand why “cookbook” matching of cognitive retraining technique to gross symptom often doesn’t work.

4. Understand why cognitive retraining by diagnoses/level of severity may not be effective, although that’s where the evidence is.

5. Cognitive retraining/psychotherapy is for those with co-morbidities.

Page 13: Psychrehabcrater

Holistic Integrated Neuropsych Remediation Programs Work for ABI

• Prigatano, GP, Fordyce, DJ, Zeiner, HK, Roueche, RR, Pepping, M, and Wood, BC: Neuropsychological rehabilitation after closed head injury in young adults. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 47, 505-513, 1984.

• Klonoff et al 1998, 2000 (11 years post discharge)

• Malec, J. 2001

• Cicerone et al 2008

Page 14: Psychrehabcrater

A study by Klonoff et al, 2007 narrowed down the “success factors” for return to work/school even more.

Page 15: Psychrehabcrater

• 1. Success in the community, work/school, best after cognitive remediation INTEGRATED with psychotherapy.

• 2. The same techniques worked for a number of ABI conditions cognitive impairment after neurological insult-

Page 16: Psychrehabcrater

• Who is most successful after TBI:

– Those who can learn to use remediations unassisted,

– Those who ally with therapists, and

– Those who slow the world down to what they need.

Page 17: Psychrehabcrater

Findings• Perceived cognitive functioning/need was not a strong factor in

influencing whether or not a subject used a cognitive support technology.

• Emphasizing level of impairment may not help at all in getting a client to use CST.

• Pre-morbid Sophisticated technology users want more freedom and autonomy than non-users post-injury.

• For them, the appeal of device is freedom from others control.

• Pre-morbid Minimal technology users appear to use technology (cell phones) to bring them together with others.

• Appeal of CST device (different device) is social bonding.

Page 18: Psychrehabcrater

One source of “personality change” is how family perceives the patient.

When questioned about how their loved one has changed in personality after acquired brain injury, family members mention anger and fatigue as the sources of “personality change” after ABI.

Zeiner, HK. Living with TBI: Impact on the Survivor and Their Family in Traumatic Brain Injury, Independent Study Course, Veterans Health Initiative: Traumatic Brain Injury, Department of Veterans Affairs, Employee Education System, p. 99-112, October 2003

Page 19: Psychrehabcrater

• A second source of personality change comes from the patient’s neurological condition.

Page 20: Psychrehabcrater

Identification of the Catastrophic Reaction

• Behavioral freezing/thought blocking• Behavioral appearance of confusion without

verbally seeking clarification• Crying• Flight• Anger• Laughing

• All six are uncomfortable emotional responses given by persons with neurological impairment when stimulus overloaded.

Page 21: Psychrehabcrater

What are the sources of the catastrophic reaction, e.g. What are the cognitive symptoms that

are most likely to result in stimulus overload and dysphoric

affect?

Some, but not all, cognitive impairments

Page 22: Psychrehabcrater

What needs to be remediated first are:

1. Those cognitive symptoms which are most likely to evoke one of the six catastrophic reactions.

2. They are remediated with a verbal cognitive construct which tells the patient what is wrong and what to do about it.

3. The performance of the cognitive construct is tied to either the presence of the catastrophic reaction (dysphoric affect) ora physiological response.

Page 23: Psychrehabcrater

• This changes the relationship of the patient to their catastrophic reaction.

• First- it is no longer a personality change or a failure- the dysphoric affect is a flag, a warning that the patient is overloaded.

• The identification of the catastrophic reaction by the patient is reframed as

“I am angry, so I must be overloaded. I need to simplify, avoid or delay.”

Page 24: Psychrehabcrater

• Patient’s learn their characteristic catastrophic reaction- pick it up as early as possible, and perform the cognitive construct to reduce stimulus overload at that moment.

• These cognitive constructs are almost always tied to ways of receiving informational input- example,

• “because I am slowed in processing, I need to ask you to repeat that information.”

Page 25: Psychrehabcrater

• A more socially acceptable version of that cognitive construct-

“What you just said is really important, could you give it to me one more time so I am sure to get it.?”

Page 26: Psychrehabcrater

• If not tied to dysphoric affect, the catastrophic reaction, the cognitive construct is tied to a daily physiological response. This is to reduce the cognitive burden on memory.

• For example, patients who use either an electronic calendar or paper memory book with a calendar- review today and tomorrow in the calendar after every meal.

• The cognitive construct is ”because I have a leaky memory, I need to review today and tomorrow in my calendar after every meal.”

Page 27: Psychrehabcrater

The cognitive remediation is all done in the context of a therapy which:

• 1. Externalizes the neurological insult.• 2. The patient’s goal is to reduce the effect

of externalized Brain Injury on the patient’s life.

• 3. Change the source of satisfaction, sense of competence from “competing to be best” to “I compensate whenever necessary; I cope adequately, a resilience model.

• 4. Focuses on “well-being”

Page 28: Psychrehabcrater

The optimal condition for rehabilitation of neurologically impaired patients is created when the patient, family and staff are allied against “demon” brain injury. This is the triangulation necessary for optimum recovery.

Alliance/Resilience Model of Therapy

Page 29: Psychrehabcrater

• Alliance/Resilience model is based on redirected anger.

• Anger is always generated when loss is experienced.

• It is adaptive, Anger creates energy to prevent collapsing in despair, and fuels the need to change. It is always present. It is natural part of the history of recovery.

• It is not pathological or delusional.

Page 30: Psychrehabcrater

• For those with brain injury, “resilience“ is defined as “I use the latest/best compensation most effectively.

• This redefines life from “be the best you can be” into, “I cope effectively but not perfectly, to all that I encounter”.

Page 31: Psychrehabcrater

To Get Change With a Cognitive Strategy,

You Have to Have Three Parts to the Cognitive Construct

1.What is the specific problem (closely related to a basic unit of brain function)

2.What you have to do to correct the specific problem

3. Both must be learned by the Patient

Page 32: Psychrehabcrater

• At the same time, the family receives cognitive retraining (as in train the trainer)

• Preferably, from the same therapist seeing the patient.

Page 33: Psychrehabcrater

Some Neuropsych Tips Caregivers Should Know

• They cannot multitask-now a one trick pony

• Inside/ outside line moved (gum-balling, seems rude, hurtful)

• Lack ideas

• Initiation difficulty (broken ignition, broken starter)

Page 34: Psychrehabcrater

Dependency- When the Survivor Can But

Doesn’t Do Something.

Think of the survivor’s brain as Swiss cheese. There is plenty of good cheese — intact circuits that were unaffected by the injury. But now there are a few “holes” where cells were injured or destroyed.

Page 35: Psychrehabcrater

• He or She who does the task- that’s whose brain is being re-wired.

• If you can do a task and you allow your spouse to do it because he or she is “faster”- their brain gets the benefit, and you get the “cost”

• For that moment they view you as “patient” not “spouse”

Page 36: Psychrehabcrater

Order of Cognitive Remediation for Most Patients with Cognitive Impairment

Page 37: Psychrehabcrater

Additional Early Issues to work on:

• How to not be overwhelmed by the world.• Impulsivity and delay.• Gumballing, or the line between what’s an inside

thought, what’s an outside thought-private versus public thoughts.

• Beginning, middle and end of behavior chain.

Page 38: Psychrehabcrater

• I’d like to present to you the cognitive symptoms that are most often used in NPI Clinic at PAVA for cognitive treatment.

• This is a clinic that performs 6-8 hour neuropsychological assessments on persons with cognitive impairments, not so much for diagnostics, as for treatment recommendations.

• About 25 % of the patients are then seen in individual therapy/cognitive remediation by the therapist, who also co-treats with their family member if possible.

Page 39: Psychrehabcrater

Problems in fatigue:

• loss of regular day/night cycle

• poor sleep

• doing with conscious effort what the rest of us do

automatically-

concept of mental energy budget

Page 40: Psychrehabcrater

• Establish a day/night cycle.

Page 41: Psychrehabcrater

• Management Strategy Disturbed Sleep/Wake Cycle.

In addition to medication, the treatment for sleep cycle disruption is to artificially impose a rigid bedtime and rise time on the patient.

Choose a total sleep time, which is 1 to 1.5 hours longer than the patient’s pre-morbid length of sleep at night.

Patients must go to bed at a set bedtime, whether or not they fall asleep.

They need to rise at a set rise time and not nap during the next day, even if very tired.

Page 42: Psychrehabcrater

It takes about 3 weeks to establish a new artificial day/night cycle.

It must be applied 7 days/week.

After the three weeks, patients can be allowed afternoon naps, but the schedule

must be maintained. If the artificial pattern is broken, it always takes about

three weeks to re-establish again.

Page 43: Psychrehabcrater

All thinking requires some expenditure of mental energy. Cognitions such as:• paying attention, • switching attentional focus to a new person, • keeping up with the topic of conversation, • organizing an answer to a question, • making a decision, • trying to decide what to do next, • organizing your day’s activities in the morning All cost mental energy.

Page 44: Psychrehabcrater

Many of the cognitive functions, which are automatic and reflexive for people without BI, require 2-3 times the mental effort to accomplish for people with BI.

This is due to the fact that people with BI often have to think about, and do with conscious effort, what the rest of the world does automatically, without thinking.

Page 45: Psychrehabcrater

• Make as many activities as possible into a routine to minimize choice. This saves mental energy.

• Do not fill up the days with scheduled activities, do one important thing/day

Page 46: Psychrehabcrater

How to Compensate for the Symptom of Fatigue.

• Make important decisions when the person has the greatest amount of mental energy, usually in the morning. Schedule patients with BI in the morning.

• Make as many activities as possible into a routine to minimize choice. This saves mental energy.

• Do not fill up the your day with scheduled activities.

Do one important thing/day

• The use of an organizer, either written, taped or electronic is essential.

Page 47: Psychrehabcrater

Problems With Sequencing:Every activity has a beginning, middle and an end.

Sometimes, people with BI drop off the “end” response.

They begin, do the middle, then begin something else, do the middle, then begin something else, etc.

By the end of the day-they have been busy, but they completed nothing.

Page 48: Psychrehabcrater

Change in pre-morbid learning/memory characteristics-(usually patient is unaware of this):

• Reduction of learning span for new material• no longer able to operate in 50% range of ability-

cannot smooth out behavior• poor retrieval unless over-learned • Reduced memory consistency/efficiency

Page 49: Psychrehabcrater

Retraining Impulsivity

If you are highly impulsive, you are jumping into action before your brain can size up what to do.

So, count (silently) to 4 before you answer or do anything.

Page 50: Psychrehabcrater

Learning/Memory: teaching new characteristics

The primary memory compensation: Patient knowing the characteristics of new memory functioning and that he/she needs to take steps to compensate for the changes.

Page 51: Psychrehabcrater

Learning/Memory: teaching new characteristics

Registration• working span (no. of bits or chunks)• effect of overage• no. of verbal stage commands (1,2,3)• Sawtooth learning curve of acquisition• New limits of asymptote (not 100%)• Massed vs. distributed practice• What was premorbid learning style• Passive vs. active learner (groups material)• Fatigability (effect on accuracy)• Over learning (repetitions to 100%, reps to over

learning)

Page 52: Psychrehabcrater

Compensation for Reduced Learning Ability

1. When learning a new task, pay attention to how many steps the survivor can easily learn at once. Break multi-step tasks into groups of 2 or three steps. Over learn those before moving on to the next 2 steps.

Page 53: Psychrehabcrater

Work with calendar in notebook/PDA

– Review today/tomorrow in calendar after meals

– How to break down tasks for calendar

Page 54: Psychrehabcrater

Planning Aids for Cognitive Disorders

brainaid.com

Attention Control Systems

Page 55: Psychrehabcrater

Cue Card

• Keeps cueing until user responds

• Different levels of cues: subtle to explicit

Focus only on current activity

• Automatically jumps to Cue Card• Cues include pictures and sounds (from camera and voice recorder)

Page 56: Psychrehabcrater

Learning/Memory: teaching new characteristics

Verbal compensations:• I’m sorry, you are rushing ahead too fast for me.

Please slow down.

• I didn’t catch that. Please repeat what you said.

• Because of my memory problem, I need to use my notebook.

• Because of my leaky memory, I need to review today and tomorrow in my notebook calendar after each meal.

Page 57: Psychrehabcrater

Notebook Stuff

1. Don’t journal-use the calendar section as memory for what to do, what to bring, what to do today for tomorrow

2. Review today and tomorrow in the calendar after each meal

3. Put down cognitive retraining statements

Page 58: Psychrehabcrater

Verbal Compensations For Poor Memory

1. Could you refresh my memory? What were we talking about?

2. What you are saying is very important. Could you repeat it for me?

3. Learn how many steps are your limit- Do Not Exceed.

Page 59: Psychrehabcrater

Verbal Compensations For Poor Memory and Anger Outbursts

That’s an important idea- Give me some time to think about it and I will get back to you later.

Page 60: Psychrehabcrater

Initiation Compensations

1. Because my “starter” is broken, I will make a comment or say something every time my family gets together (or I am in any social group).

2. Others judge us by our verbal output- if your talking has decreased, others will assume

silence= less smarts

Page 61: Psychrehabcrater

Problem solving (non interpersonal Content): Additional Constructs

• When I don’t know what to do , I need to say, can you help me?

• Because I have trouble with new problems, I need to ask someone to help me break this into steps.

• When solving a problem, I have a tendency to not see the big picture, and I get caught by detail. I should check with someone before deciding.

• I should talk my way through the problem while solving it, this tends to make me aware of additional things I know to solve the problem.

Page 62: Psychrehabcrater

Problems in social appropriateness:

• Inability to de-center in conversation• Inability to read others emotional

expressions • Inability to read complex social

situations visually• Inability to negotiate (de-centering and

multi-track)• Line between inside thought/outside

thought has moved. (Gumballing)• Age of injury/insult precluded learning

some social schema (Shank and Abelson)

Page 63: Psychrehabcrater

Trouble Reading Other’s Emotions

Because I have trouble (spatially) reading other peoples faces, I need to ask how they are feeling to read them correctly.

Make like a psychologist and sprinkle your speech with “So how do you feel about that?”

Page 64: Psychrehabcrater

Social Problem Solving

Negotiating:

1. State the other persons main point. What do they want?

2. State your point. What do you want?

3. State a sentence which includes half of what they want and half of what you want.

Page 65: Psychrehabcrater

Social Compensation’s

Caretaking spouses often feel unappreciated for their extraordinary efforts.

Writing a couple of phrases of appreciation “You are such a wonderful partner, I’m so lucky to have you”. Or “Have I told you I love you?” in the patient’s memory book or electronic organizer every few days, (which the patient reviews after each meal) can make a spouse feel that their efforts are noticed.

Page 66: Psychrehabcrater

Social Problem Solving

Problem determining what is an outside and what is an inside thought-

Often patient exhibits “gumballing”- speaking thoughts, with no awareness of impact.

Counting delay plus “Is this an inside or an outside thought?” helps. What really helps is informing family that they are hearing the patient’s thoughts.

Page 67: Psychrehabcrater

Conclusions• 1. Work on that which results in stimulus

overload.• 2. Link performance of a cognitive strategy to

patient’s catastrophic reaction.• 3. Link performance of a cognitive strategy to a

physiological response.• 4. Externalize the neurological insult and

triangulate the patient/family/therapist against it. • 5. Work to change the source of self-esteem

from a “competitive best” model to a resilience (performance of the construct whenever needed) model.

Page 68: Psychrehabcrater

5:1 rule becomes 8:1

Say 8 positive things for every “correction” you

Offer- to everyone.