Psychological Study of Hussein Obama

8/14/2019 Psychological Study of Hussein Obama

1/16

Senator Barack Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Hillary Clinton and Ruth

Harkin stand during the national anthem.Barack Hussein Obama's photo (that's his

real name)... REFUSED TO NOT ONLY PUT HIS HAND ON HIS HEART DURING

THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BUT REFUSED TO SAY THE PLEDGE.....how can an

American-hater like this expect to be our next Commander-in-Chief

The media has said that Obama is the greatest orator ever seen. His verbal

presentations have been called as exciting as Springsteen concerts, by Marxist

journalists. Yet even children notice no such orator power emanating from Obama.He talks like a boring negro preacher. He uses that rhythm which the media calls

hypnotic but objective people refer to as boringly crude and phony.

He stumbles, over his rehearsed presentation as sane viewers look at the cheering

section of white people behind him. They are well made up to look like working

people but it is obvious that they have been recruited from the ranks of Marxistacademia. Their faces continually reflect worshipful awe and reverence for the

below average black man they call the One. Do you trust people who are so crazy

about a man who is involved with Marxist terrorists, plans to re-distribute workingmens wages too the rich and blacks and oozes with deceit and evil?


2/16

Patti wood

If you have been watching Obama speak and give interviews you may have noticed

that he seems to reveal spot light more than even the most egotistical of political

candidates. He spends a half hour going through the crowd after he is introduced,shaking hands like a Messiah. He has this condescending look down his nose at your

sneer when he talks to interviewers and looks especially perturbed and angry when

berating someone who he perceives is attacking him. He morphs his voice and bodylanguage to suit each audience in a manner that goes beyond customization to easily

acting a part. I believe he is narcissistic. Here are other narcissistic nonverbal and

behavioral cues that one of my blog readers wrote about Obama.One of my readers

is getting his doctorate on evolution and ecology and wrote me:Ive spent years trying to recognize the most accurate indicators of NPD

(Narcissistic Personality Disorder). There are a handful that Ive come to trust,though theyre a bit difficult to convey.1. An amorphous expression that looks like a child, about three years old, needing

approval. Ive almost never seen this expression in someone who isnt NPD

(occasionally in Borderline Personality Disorder, a closely related type II

personality disorder). To me, its an exceptionally good indicator. Its often afleeting micro-expression (hard to catch without practice). Its an expression of

yearning and need, directed toward the person theyre interacting with. In males,

it makes the face look like that of a little boy. Some psychologists argue that a

developmental stage goes awry in NPD, roughly around the age of three.2. The eyes of NPDs usually have an unusual look. My face-reading friend describes

them as dead eyes. I perceive NPD eyes as no boundary between inside and

outside. Some people perceive them as magnetic. Theres reduced activity in someof the musculature around the eyes. This includes a reduced response to emotion-

laden scenes or speech (e.g. less of a startle response to disturbing visuals). At

times, it can produce a detached appearance - or a languid, even slightly sleepy

look. The startle response of pupils (e.g. to disturbing scenes) is often diminishedrelative to normal people (both less of a change in pupil diameter, and a longer lag

before pupil size changes). I think people with NPD also spend less time playing

through internal imagery (visible in eye tracking and facial expressions).

3. Theres also something I call frozen cheeks. Muscles in the cheek region arentas mobile as in normal people. This is partly due to a subtle expression of contempt

and partly due to increased control over appearance.

The contempt can often be an open clear-cut expression, but much of the time itsjust a subtle tensing of the musculature, underlying the apparent expression.


3/16

Obama displays all of these (the first as micro expressions). Theres also hisentitlement body language, his glares, his cocked head and looking down the nose,

etc.. He occupies quite a bit of space and also frequently initiates physical contact

- e.g. putting his hand on someones back or arm.

An assured smooth gesture - in a way thats slightly unusual given our culturesdefinition of personal boundaries. The anger in his face is kind of interesting.

Sometimes its blatant, but more often its a subtle expression. When Hillary

scores a solid point in a debate, or when a journalist challenges him in a question,you can see a sustained increase in the subtle expression of anger. People with NPD

often have a high level of latent anger that can be triggered by any injury to self-

image (narcissistic injury).

In case you havent seen these, here are a links to a couple of YouTube videos thatpeople have put together capturing some of Obamas more blatant anger/contempt

expressions:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9coNTKQi544http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvFSECcANZE&feature=related

People with NPD are typically hypercompetitive and hate losing. One woman I know

of would throw the checkerboard across the room if she lost a game of checkers

with her eight year old son. Obama is clearly hypercompetitive and is known as abad loser - people that he has played poker with comment on him being a poor loser,

and hes said to be a bad loser in politics as well (e.g. when he lost to Bobby Rush).

Narcissists that Ive known are generally charming and very well-liked (except by

those theyve injured). They often set up a cult of personality, though on a muchsmaller scale than Obama - a circle of admiring people.

Theres a need for a high level of admiration.

Paul Street, a progressive columnist, had the following observations afterattending an Obama rally in Iowa:

So why wasnt I dancing and singing along? Why did I have a terrible taste in my

mouth two hours after Obamas speech even as the sun shone and the warm spring

breeze passed through my den just a mile east of the Pentacrest?Part of it was the narcissism of the self-presentation. Obama does this creepy

thing after being introduced. He approaches the stage only after a good 5 minutes

of passing through a parting sea of applauding audience members.

Please. Candidates should stand humbly by the side of the stage and walk up rightafter being introduced. I do not attend political rallies to see a pretend savior

savoring popular adulation as he dances through the cool stream of the multitude.

Though people with NPD often cultivate a circle of admirers, they tend to have fewtrue friends. Theres often an odd hint of aloneness to them.


4/16

You mentioned that you found Obama chameleon-like.This is common in NPD.For someone with NPD, its predominantly about the surface

- the image in the mirror. Theres less of a solid core. One perspective that many

psychologists subscribe to is that in NPD, the true self is greatly diminished or

largely absent, having largely been replaced by a false self. Another interestingcharacteristic, in my experience, is that people with NPD often take on a stance of

amused indifference. Floating slightly above it all, sometimes with a slight bit of

contempt. You can often see Obama doing this in interviews.The entitlement aspectcomes through not only in his body language, but also in things he does and says.For

example, he was interviewed about the tactics he used to first win elected office,

as an Illinois State Senator. It was a very liberal Chicago district, so the only real

opposition was in the Democratic primary. He had four opponents, including theincumbent (a woman named Alice Palmer - long time popular activist). Obama hired

the best lawyers in Chicago and used aggressive legal tactics to challenge thenominating petitions of each of his opponents; knocking them all off the ballot sothat he could run unopposed (it would have been very difficult for him to win the

election if the incumbent remained on the ballot). In 2007 a reporter asked him

about this:Asked whether the districts primary voters were well-served by having

only one candidate, Obama smiled and said: I think they ended up with a very goodstate senator.And he defended his use of ballot maneuvers: If you can win, you

should win and get to work doing the peoples business.

In my experience, people with NPD use language in a very distinctive way. I have

found the following description by Sam Vaknin to be pretty accurate (though thedescription is too flowery for my taste):

Narcissists dont talk, or communicate. They fend off. They hide and evade and

avoid and disguise. In their planet of capricious and arbitrary unpredictability, ofshifting semiotic and semantic dunes - they perfect the ability to say nothing in

lengthy, Castro-like speeches.

It is the fact that language is put by Narcissists to a different use - not to

communicate but to obscure, not to share but to abstain, not to learn but todefend and resist, not to teach but to preserve ever less tenable monopolies, to

disagree without incurring wrath, to criticize without commitment, to agree

without appearing to do so. Thus, an agreement with a narcissist is a vague

expression of intent at a given moment - rather than the clear listing of long term,iron-cast and mutual commitments. Communication through unequivocal,

unambiguous, information-rich symbol systems is such an integral and crucial part

of our world - that its absence is not postulated even in the remotest galaxies


5/16

which grace the skies of science fiction. In this sense, narcissists are nothingshort of aliens.

With cerebral narcissists, language is a lover. The infatuation with its very sound

leads to a pyrotechnic type of speech which sacrifices its meaning to its music. Its

speakers pay more attention to the composition than to the content. They areswept by it, intoxicated by its perfection, inebriated by the spiraling complexity of

its forms.

Another interesting aspect of NPD is a desire and tendency to merge withothers. With Obama this manifests, for example, in the nature of the personality

cult he is encouraging. You can also see a bit of it in statements like We are the

ones weve been waiting for; we are the change that we seek.

One of the core deficits in NPD - perhaps the core deficit - is a deficiency inempathy. They can talk about empathy (e.g. one NPD woman I know likes to lecture

others about empathy), and their cognitive empathy is intact (they can correctlyinterpret what others are feeling - often better than average), but theres adeficiency in affective empathy. That Obama can be empathy-challenged has been

noted by the occasional reporter. e.g.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7486.html

Several genetic studies have been done to separate environmental from geneticeffects in NPD (mostly studies using twins). These studies have consistently shown

NPD to be highly heritable. Across the studies that Ive seen, the median estimate

of heritability is somewhere roughly around 0.7 (on a linear scale of 0 to 1, with 1

being perfectly heritable). This doesnt mean that someone with an NPD parent willnecessarily be NPD, but it does mean that theyre at substantially increased risk.

There are also environmental risk factors (e.g. abuse or excessive adulation during

childhood). Along these lines, the history of Obamas father is really interesting(ignore the headline - the person composing the headline appears not to have read

the article).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=4319

08&in_page_id=1770Obamas sister had an interesting comment:

Barack was a lot like my father - his hand movements, his gestures, how he talks,

how he sits. Hes got certain quietness about him and he sits and he concentrates

like my father. He can be in a room full of people and he withdraws on his own. Andweve all got the Obama hands - the fingers and everything. So it was amazing to

watch that, because I was meeting him for the first time but it felt like I knew

him. Another almost-universal feature of NPD is a strong sense of restlessness.Many psychologists attribute this to an internal feeling of emptiness. The feeling


6/16

of emptiness leads to a desire/need for new experiences, as well as a desire foradulation, and a tendency toward drug and alcohol abuse.

Obama writes about his own restlessness, and its been commented on by others.

e.g. from a Vanity Fair article:

A chronic restlessness, an inability to appreciate, no matter how well things weregoing, those blessings that were right there in front of me. He has tried to turn

this to his advantage. I know I havent spent a lot of time learning the ways of

Washington, he said in announcing that he would run for president. But Ive beenthere long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change. Obamas

restlessness is a quality that would lead him to conclude, again and again, that the

time had come to make a moveto take a chance, to aim higher - when others told

him to wait his turn.Anyway, those are some of the reasons I think Obama has NPD.

Though NPD is rare in the general population (1-2%), for a very complicated set ofreasons Ive ended up having contact with a pretty large sample size.So Ive developed good recognition skills.

Ill include the DSM IV criteria for NPD.

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration,

and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety ofcontexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance

2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brillance, beauty, or

ideal love3. believes that he or she is special and unique

4. requires excessive admiration

5. has a sense of entitlement6. is interpersonally exploitative

7. lacks empathy

8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her

9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

If you have extended personal contact with people diagnosed with NPD, youll find

that its a really distinctive entity (unmistakable for garden-variety narcissism or

other personality quirks).Obama has stated that his backround, being the child of black and white parents,

and his unique experience make him uniquely qualified to help unify blacks and

whites; add the N-component and the argument takes on a different meaning: I amunique and all others ( he insinuates whites) who disagree with me are not in fact,


7/16

they are typical ( and typical means not unique); I would propose he felt slighted atlooking black, so he sided with the black community, black church, black wife, and

black cause which the cause celeb is , Not to be equal, but better than - to be

supremely unique which for a N-person means to dominate which is their end

game;Narcissism comes in many different flavors, but it behaves the same, the control

tactics are an arsenal of overt and covert manipulation, charm, flattery, slights,

contrariness, one upmanship, adaptability, and more, all done to dominate; I find itinteresting when Obama states what good ideas he and Clinton share, he declares

he is the better candidate; he lifts her up when they are in agreement, and puts

her down to undermine her credibility; this is part of the approach, assess,

overvalue then devalue cycle that all Ns engage in on a cyclical basiswhy?The N-person has a false-ego that requires constant bolstering and the N-person

seeks out those he can use: to gleen expertise from, to get support from, or tocontrol;More importantly, the N-person envies others who they perceive as truly better

than they areas in, more skilled, more astute, more successful, etc; the N-person

sees themselves as perfect on an unconscious level, and any person who challenges

their perfection ( their worldview and self-image, false as they may be) isconsidered the enemy; they are very poor losers and very poor team players; they

are good at motivating, charming, encouragingthen they take the credit for other

peoples accomplishments or achievements as though they had done those acts

themselves; this boosts their false-ego and keeps their sense of self stable;

Obama's paralanguage is chameleon-like. He changes his voice so dramatically tosuit his location, his audience, and his topic, that it is difficult to know just what

his real voice is or who he truly is. Listen to how Obama's cadence has that certain

rhythm like a Baptist preacher. Listen to how he speaks on beat and extends

certain words. For example, "They saaaaaaaid this day would never come."Preachers have a special rhythmic pattern where their voices fluctuate up and

down like a song and pause on a beat rhythmically like a paradiddle on a drum. His

speaking is so musical and pleasing to the ear, that we can be moved by the rhythm

and not even hear the words. In fact the words may actually lack substance and hecan get by without really saying anything new in the speech.

Obamas vocal style is hypnotic, such that when his voice goes up and then hepauses, you almost want to cheer and say amen. You cant help yourself. He actually


8/16

copies the feel and the cadence of Martin Luther Kings I had a dream speech.Listen to how to his volume goes up and up and upstirring the crowd, and then he

pauses for effect. He waits until the audience cheers before he moves on to the

next sentence. Pausing makes the word before the pause, and sometimes the entire

sentence before the pause, sound more powerful and important.

And notice how he says particular words, like you small towns and churches,

Ameeerica, and affooordableeeee. As he draws these words out, he puts on aslightly more southern accent or he casually slurs the word. That makes him sound

like one of the common folk. So even when we know that he came from an upper

class family, when he says, calloused hand by calloused hand, he sounds like he

was there with us working on the farm and plowing the field.

Body language analysis of Presidential candidate Obama

One of the most interesting and dramatic aspects of Obamas body and para

language is that it changes so much from speech to speech and location to location.While many candidates slow down their speech slightly to charm their southern

audiences and increase their rate for New York news shows, Obama transforms.

For example, if you had never heard him speak before and watched him give his

Selma Alabama speech you would note his voice is extremely slow and takes on therelaxed consonants and cadence of Alabama. When he is interviewed on1/10/2007

concerning his response to the Bush Speech his voice pace is face, his speech isclipped, and his consonants are crisp.

When he is out in crowds he stops to talk to someone he laser focuses on them. He

gives them significant extended eye contact, leans forward and stays in their

intimate zone of space. These behaviors we observed in the charismatic Clinton.Remember what makes a candidate look honest and powerful to us when we view

him or her on the small screen, may be counter to what may look appropriate to the

audience he or she is speaking to when they are taped in front of a live audience.

When speaking, behind a podium or on a stage without he does something ratherunusual he turns his face and body to sides or moves his entire body towards the

audience to shows his desire to empathize and connect with them. However, when

we view that on video we may read it differently subconsciously. For example, Inthe Selma speech he turns his face and body to his right side then left again and

again, rather than focus to the front and center. Front and center speaking is read


9/16

as more honest, more forthright and powerful. On the tapes speech 2 of 5 onyou/tube he actually leans his body from the waist up out towards the audience of

students as he makes each point. Typically candidates stay straight up and down to

show they are Straight and strong on issues.

Obamas body language cues are different in debates and interviews than inspeeches. In Third televised debate Keys Obama becomes visibly angry he jabs out

his finger at the interviewer in a symbolic weapon even a one time at the end of the

interview. At one point he even puts up both hands with the forefingers outsymbolically firing as if there were guns in each hand pushes his hand out toward,

not just in a symbolic stop sign, but a more aggressive pushing away motion.

Nonverbally when can see he is an emotional man. Look for interviews like his

response to Bush speech. Watch his mouth goes up more on his left side. Ouremotional right hemisphere controls the left side of he face when there is a split

face and one side shows more than the other note which side. The mouth twistingup to his left says he was feeling very emotional and though he wished to control ithe couldnt.

One of the most interesting and dramatic aspects of Obamas body and para

language is that it changes so much from speech to speech and location to location.

While many candidates slow down their speech slightly to charm their southernaudiences and increase their rate for New York news shows, Obama transforms.

For example, if you had never heard him speak before and watched him give his

Selma Alabama speech you would note his voice is extremely slow and takes on the

relaxed consonants and cadence of Alabama. When he is interviewed on1/10/2007concerning his response to the Bush Speech his voice pace is face, his speech is

clipped, and his consonants are crisp.

Remember what makes a candidate look honest and powerful to us when we view

him or her on the small screen, may be counter to what may look appropriate to the

audience he or she is speaking to when they are taped in front of a live audience.

When speaking, behind a podium or on a stage without he does something ratherunusual he turns his face and body to sides or moves his entire body towards the

audience to shows his desire to empathize and connect with them. However, when

we view that on video we may read it differently subconsciously. For example, In

the Selma speech he turns his face and body to his right side then left again andagain, rather than focus to the front and center. Front and center speaking is read

as more honest, more forthright and powerful. On the tapes speech 2 of 5 on

you/tube he actually leans his body from the waist up out towards the audience ofstudents as he makes each point. Typically candidates stay straight up and down to


10/16

show they are Straight and strong on issues.Obamas body language cues are different in debates and interviews than in

speeches. In Third televised debate Keys Obama becomes visibly angry he jabs out

his finger at the interviewer in a symbolic weapon even a one time at the end of the

interview. At one point he even puts up both hands with the forefingers outsymbolically firing as if there were guns in each hand pushes his hand out toward,

not just in a symbolic stop sign, but a more aggressive pushing away motion.

Nonverbally when can see he is an emotional man. Look for interviews like hisresponse to Bush speech. Watch his mouth goes up more on his left side. Our

emotional right hemisphere controls the left side of he face when there is a split

face and one side shows more than the other note which side. The mouth twisting

up to his left says he was feeling very emotional and though he wished to control ithe couldnt.

At the beginning of the debates Obama was calm, blank eyed and seemed morecoached and less passionate and at times although he kept gesturing, his eyes

seemed dead eyed.

Obama needed to be more cool, collected and in control. McCain showed moreenergy but overall did not seem presidential. He has more knowledge but his energy

was wasted in attacks, verbal and nonverbal. He walked toward towards Obama as

he attacked, but then would step back. Neither move showing strength. He often

showed snarly smirking facial expressions as he walked toward Obama and pointedat him in little jabs. While discussing the Bush/Cheney-backed energy bill "stuffed

full" of goodies for the oil companies. "Know who voted for it? That one," he says,

not looking at Obama. "Know who voted against it? I did..." This was the biggestnonverbal memorable moment in the debate and was all negative for McCain. A big

mistake.

Powerful debaters let attackers come to them and smile or act bored. Obamasmiled as if McCain's attack didnt mean a thing. McCain needed to show his

confidence and superior experience knowledge but with the exception of a few

questions, like what we should do about Russia, his true deep knowledge was not

shown.

Obama attacked McCain during the debates by standing near his chair or walking

forward using his hand to make fists. He didnt look at him, and that worked. Ididnt like any of the attacks but Obamas method of attack worked.


11/16

While McCain talked and Obama waited and listen for his next question, Obama saton his stool with one leg down up with his foot resting on the bar with his legs

spread open to take a posture of cool power.

I could almost see a black and white photo of him in that same pose on the cover of

a jazz CD. This was not the same pausing, awkward Obama. His coaching betweenthe debates was clear. Answer the questions quickly and strongly. Often Obama

leapt out of the chair and strode toward Moderator Brokaw as he answered

Brokaw's question. Obama loves a podium. He was more awkward in the town hall.

Remember, we tend to choose the winning candidate in a debate seconds after it

begins. Typically, we make these choices based on the charismatic factors of

Likeability, attractiveness and level of dominance.

The media raves about Obamas youthful virility and cHarisma. Yet all that normalpeople see is a flabby bent man who emits a listless lack of vigor. Instead ofseeming like his 47 year old self, he seems like an old man who is sorry for what he

is about to do.

Look closely at Obamas pallid face. It is sad and yet that sadness underscores acertain evil. The lines of his face are those found on the face of a deceiver. He

looks like a man who is patiently waiting to exact revenge. He is not a loving man

but a shallow construct of bigotry and hatred masquerading as genius

The medoia says that Hussein Obama is an immensely talented man. Where are

thos talents. Is it a mark of talent when a man has

been largely devoted to crafting, and chronicling, his own life by leaving out suchfacts as his college grades, his birth certificate, why he has several bogus names

and his citizenship in Kenya and Indonesia.? What he offers is: Not things.

Not ideas. Not institutions. But himself. Those raving democrat hyenas who cheer

him so passionately are either insane or they have a secret agenda.

There is nothing wrong or even terribly odd about a man who hides his past and

illegally hides his citizenship, the media tells us. The media refuses to investigate

Obama and ignore his violation of campaign contribution laws. Even McCain, his PCopponent is afraid of him because he is black. That too is insane. Why arent they

more worried that Hussein is laying claim to the job of crafting the coming history

of the United States. A leapof such audacity by a criminal is odd. The air of uneaseat the Democratic convention this week was not just a result of the Clinton


12/16

psychodrama. The deeper anxiety was that the party was nominating a man whoclaimed many gifts but was not able to show them nor was he able to display even a

precious few accomplishments -- bearing even fewer witnesses.

When John Kerry was introduced at his convention four years ago, an honorguard of a dozen mates from his Vietnam days surrounded him on the podium

attesting to his character and readiness to lead. Such personal testimonials

are the norm. The roster of fellow soldiers or fellow senators who couldfrom personal experience vouch for John McCain is rather long. At a less

partisan date in the calendar, that roster might even include Democrats Russ

Feingold and Edward Kennedy, with whom John McCain has worked to fashion

important legislation.

Eerily missing at the Democratic convention this year were people of staturewho were seriously involved at some point in Obama's life standing up tosay: 'I know Barack Obama. I've been with Barack Obama.

We've toiled/endured together. You can trust him. I do.'

Hillary Clinton could have said something like that. She and Obama had,after all, engaged in a historic, utterly compelling contest for the

nomination. During her convention speech, you kept waiting for her to offer

just one line of testimony: I have come to know this man, to admire this

man, to see his character, his courage, his wisdom, his judgment. Whatever.Anything.

Instead, nothing. She of course endorsed him. But the endorsement wasentirely programmatic: We're all Democrats. He's a Democrat. He believes

what you believe. So we must elect him -- I am currently unavailable -- to

get Democratic things done. God bless America.

Clinton's withholding the 'I've come to know this man' was neither vindictive nor

supremely self-serving it was jarring, because you realize that if she

didn't do it, no one else would. Because there are inherent deficiencies in

Obama's character. At the least, it is the reflection of a young, outsider life witha suspicious biography remarkably thin by the standard of presidential candidates.

Who was there to speak about the real Barack Obama? His wife. She could tell


13/16

you about Hussein the father, the husband and the family man, But Michele doesntspeak in a winning and

sincere way. Her voice frequently chokes with anti-semitic and anti-white hatred.

She is one of those loud hate-filled and obnoxious black women that is found on

every bus, aircraft or train. People avoid most black females because of their evilthreatening manner. Such avoidance reinforces them as they warply assume that

white people are afraid of them. Well are you, punk? So any boring study of

Hussein the liar and straw man only takes you so far.It doesn't take you to the public man, the national leader.

Who is to testify to that? Hillary's husband on night three did scream that

Obama is 'ready to lead.' However, he offered not a shred of evidence, letalone personal experience with Obama. And although he pulled it off

charmingly, everyone knew that, having been suggesting precisely theopposite for months, he meant not a word of it.

Obama's vice presidential selection, Joe Biden, naturally advertised his

patron's virtues, such as the fact that he had 'reached across party lines

to ... keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists.' But securingloose nukes is as bipartisan as motherhood and as uncontroversial as apple

pie. The measure was so minimal that it passed by voice vote and received

near zero media coverage. Hussein did not actually keep nuclear weapons out of the

hands of terrorists he just got on the bus, up front, because his media advisorstold him to.

Assume John McCain had retired from politics.

Would he have testified to Obama's political courage in reaching across the

aisle to work with him on ethics reform, a collaboration Obama boasted about

in the Saddleback debate? 'In fact,' reports the Annenberg Political FactCheck, 'the two worked together for barely a week, after which McCain

accused Obama of 'partisan posturing'' -- and launched a volcanic missive

charging him with double cross.

So where are the colleagues? The buddies? The political or spiritual soul

mates? His most important spiritual adviser and mentor was Jeremiah Wright.

But that crazy black nazi is out. Then there's William Ayers, the prominent andmurderous terrorist who has had his picture made recently standing on a US flag.


14/16

The traitor Ayers, with whom Hussein served on Marxist directed board ? Therest of the story is hushed up. He's out. Where are the others?

The oddity of the very undemocratic convention was that its central figure was

supposed to be the ultimateself-made man, a dazzling mysterious Gatsby. Thepalpable apprehension is that the anointed one is a stranger -- a slouching hate-

filled straw man ready to sacrifice Americaa to his black bigotries.

He stranger with whom the slutty Democrats have had a torrid affair. Havingslowly woken up, they see the ring and wonder who exactly they married last night.

Meanwhile, what is Obamas bullet-point message? He doesnt really have one. Hes

spent the past months giving detailed speeches about seconadry or teriarysubjects like public education policy. His refusal to speak about important issues

like his own veracity, legitimacy and ability are not admirable. Thank God the 15-second sound-bite version of this speech doesnt register with those casual votersthe same way McCains sound bites do. But will God intervene to save us. Where was

he when the same Marxists seized Russia less than 100 years ago? Glowing reviews

from education policy think tanks really arent going to do Obama much good right

now. Isnt Ayers the terrorist a well received felon of the American socialisteducation established. Say it now. Hes a killer and how.

Whats worse, Obamas delivery on the stump and when facing the press has been

terrible. He shows strikingly little passion, litters his remarks with uhs and

stretches out every fourth or fifth word in a way that deflates the impact of hissentences. But his biggest sin is that he lacks a simple, index-card justification for

his candidacy, the kinds of powerful and understandable themes that McCain belts

out with such intensity several times a day. Why does Obama want to be president?Those busy commuters hearing him for a few seconds on their car radio have no

idea. They are told: Listen bastard. Vote for Obama or you are a racist who will

suffer! They cringe and look away in sheer terror. These poor excuses for

humanity are Obamas people.Not that all is lost for Obama. The voters who will decide this election, for the

most part, still like him because the media says he is likable and adoration of

Hussein is only instinctive. It is a sick and ugly love they place on the altar of the

new Archon. Yet, it is something that most recent Democratic nominees have nothad going for them and they think its great. And they are still inclined to throw

the G.O.P. out of the White House. But they also like McCain and they also are

inclined to believe that hes not a typical Republican. The difference, for now, isthat McCain is making a much stronger and clearer case to them than Obama is.


15/16

Look at the face and body language of Hussein Obama there is nothing about theDemocratic candidate is considered funny. At least not by the late-night television

hosts Jay Leno and David Letterman, who supply 95 per cent of the domestic

market in political gags.

Analysts went through the archives and found that, even on the rare occasion of anObama-related joke, it was usually at the expense of someone else, such as Hillary

Clinton or Jesse Jackson.

When a presenter on New York's public radio station appealed to his usuallytalkative listeners to ring in with their favorite Obama joke, the lines went dead.

Various excuses have been supplied, some more convincing than others.

Jon Stewart, liberal media pin-up and host of the The Daily Show, said that when

he'd recently tried a Hussein joke, he had met with such dry mouthed andterrorized audience resistance that he had told them: "You know, you're allowed to

laugh at him." Thank you media freak for giving me permission to react.There is terror afoot in America. It is the irrational stupid terror of the weak anddisenfranchised. Only television insiders admitted that white writers, presenters

and audiences are uneasy about making fun of a black man. They dont want to be

called racist. In other words these people have accepted blacks as some type of

sacrosanct race, above accountability for anything they do. The consequences ofsuch thinking will raise an African master race in America that will ruin the lives of

millions of white people afraid to criticize unfair treatment or stand up for their

rights.

The fanatic defenders of obama and the black will to dominate by proclaiming thatObama is too new, too popular and, most of all, just too uncomedic. If he makes it

to the White House, things will change, they promised.

Yeah, for how long will the rat change his spots?I'll hold my breath in anticipationof uproarious laughter.

A new analysis of Obama's voice patterns and the delivery of his speeches has

been made available . The analysis found the Democratic candidate somewhat

restricted in his range of facial expression. (thats an underastatement.)Specifically, Obama's face is locked in an almost permanent attitude

of anxiety, with his forehead muscles contracted.

"In all topics Mr Obama displays a similar worried, serious-looking facial pattern.

Even when talking about more positive subjects, his facial expressions do not signalpositive affective states," said a report on the analysis, undertaken by the Vox

Institute in Geneva for the Clearwater consulting group.The institute reviewed footage of Obama's speeches and those of the Republican candidate, John

McCain. It relied on footage from four speeches conveying a range of emotions, as well as


16/16

digitised voice samples, to rate the effectiveness of the two candidates in connecting withvoters on the campaign trail.

The habitual worried look is a potential liability for Obama, undermining the image

he is trying to project of a confident leader. The image could be disturbing for

audiences, said James McBrien, the founder of Clearwater.It also undercuts Obama's tirelessly, media enunciated, extreme confidence.

"There is an element of the fact that he is on the edges of his comfort zone here,"

McBrien said. "Going into a presidential campaign is not something he has donebefore, and you could say it is written all over his face."

Despite that failing, Obama was the clear winner against McCain in the oratorical

contest. The result is unsurprising, since McCain's own campaign team has gone to

some effort to conceal his limitations as a speaker. A person with a speech defectcould out talk McCain, as long as he is black! The Republican is restricted in his

range of motion because of injuries sustained during the Vietnam war. He tends tokeep his hands by his side when he speaks. Its payback for serving his country. Themarxists say: What goes arpound comes around.

McCain has had problems adapting to the Autocue, that staple of public speaking.

He refuses to learn how to adapt to.On the campaign trail he has favoured smaller

venues, where he can take questions from audiences, rather than the pompousvenues and Church of Zion preacher speeches that have become Obama's

signature. All of Obamas siganature glares, ape brow stares and sarcasm is ignored

by the experts convinced that obma is great.

Psychological Study of Hussein Obama

Documents

Transcript of Psychological Study of Hussein Obama