Psy121 Paper 1

download Psy121 Paper 1

of 3

Transcript of Psy121 Paper 1

  • 8/2/2019 Psy121 Paper 1

    1/3

    Juvenile Delinquency: A Product of Nurture Rather than Nature

    Brown, Christopher M.

    0636352

    William (Kit) Nash

    Online

    June 3, 2010

    Juvenile Delinquency: A Product of Nurture Rather than Nature

    Criminal behavior is often viewed as resulting from some combination of internal

    and external features in ones life. The former of these denotes some psychological

    imbalance resulting in deviant behavior whereas the latter notes some set of externalities

    producing a tendency toward criminal behaviors. Where juvenile subjects are concerned

    though, this opens a number of problematic assumptions regarding the qualifications of a

    child or adolescent to effectively judge the difference between right and wrong. Many

    specific contexts of deviant behavior may occur in contexts where complexity, nuance and

    emotion make judgment difficult for those lacking a certain degree of maturity. It is within

    this difficult context that we attempt to determine what degree of juvenile delinquency is

    the result of nature and what degree is the result of nurture.

    Our research tends to demonstrate that most juvenile offenders are less likely to

    demonstrate a categorical nature of criminality, but that instead most are likely to be the

    product of deficiencies in formative nurturing. In addition to this conflict with

    1

  • 8/2/2019 Psy121 Paper 1

    2/3

    development psychology theories regarding the moral, intellectual and emotional

    development of children, there are myriad theories for deviant behavior amongst children

    that are based on external rather than internal stimuli. Sociological explanations for

    deviant violence and persistent criminal activity often suggest that environmental realities

    have conspired to cause emotional disorder and disturbed behavior, reinforcing the view

    that nurture is a primary instigator for such patterns. For instance, in addition to the

    resolution that the absence of a father in a family unit is positively correlated with

    economic problems, educational shortcomings and a susceptibility to criminal behavior, it

    also becomes clear here that the reverse is true. In individuals suffering from certain

    adverse emotional conditions, there is a greater likelihood that further probing will reveal

    the absence of a father. In particular, there is such a connection between adverse emotional

    effects and the fathers legal status. For children of fathers in jail or prison especially, this

    holds true.

    So is this demonstrated in the research endeavor conducted by Wilbur et al (2007),

    in which a survey amongst 102 respondents yields a pattern indicative of the psychological

    consequences of patriarchal incarceration. To the point, Wilbur et al find that children

    whose fathers were in jail had higher Children's Depression Inventory total scores

    compared with children without incarcerated fathers, indicating more depressive

    symptoms. This finding was robust in multivariate analyses after adjustment for children's

    age, gender, prenatal cocaine and alcohol exposure, and school-age violence exposure.

    (Wilbur et al, 678) The adjustment for this variance of factors which can also be said to

    impact ones vulnerability to depression reveals that the incarceration of ones father is a

    prime determinant of the presence of emotional difficulty or psychological disorder for the

    2

  • 8/2/2019 Psy121 Paper 1

    3/3

    child. Here, we can see that the mental disorders associated with a delinquent nature might

    not properly identify the root of the subjects emotional distress and that further, such

    diagnosis would prevent the usage of such potentially useful therapeutic methods as

    cognitive behavioral reprogramming.

    Other explanations for juvenile delinquent behavior suggest that there are even

    broader cultural reasons for this. For instance, Gilligan (1997) presents a unique angle on a

    long-held conversation that affiliates deviant behavior in children with violent television

    and video games. Blame of the media, for instance, for stimulating violent behavior in

    children, is addressed as an inverse way of understanding the omnipresence of human

    violent impulses. Gilligan contends that the pornography of violencethe

    sensationalizing of violenceis a means by which we distance ourselves from it, perhaps

    render it less frightening and more manageable by reducing it to the dimensions of

    titillation and entertainment. (Gilligan, 30)

    Once again, this seems to suggest that the context in which the child is nurtured is

    often an appropriate place to look in order to find root causes for criminal tendencies.

    Proper diagnosis of environmental distress might help to remove children from situations

    and context which stimulated delinquent tendencies.

    Works Cited:

    Gilligan, J. (1997). VIOLENCE: Reflection on a National Epidemic. Vintage.

    Wilbur, M.A.B.; Marani, J.E.; Appugliese, D.; Woods, R.; Siegel, J.A.; Cabral, H.J. &

    Frank, D.A. (2007). Socioemotional Effects of Fathers Incarceration on Low-Income,

    Urban School-Aged Children. Pediatrics, 120(3), 678-685.

    3