PSA VOLATILITY INDEX (PVI) & UPDATE ON PSA KINETICS
description
Transcript of PSA VOLATILITY INDEX (PVI) & UPDATE ON PSA KINETICS
PSA VOLATILITY INDEX (PVI)
& UPDATE ON PSA KINETICS
John Phillips, MD 19 November, 2010
New York Medical College Hackensack University Medical Center
PSA VOLATILITY INDEX (PVI)
& UPDATE ON PSA KINETICS
John Phillips, MD 19 November, 2010
New York Medical College Hackensack University Medical Center
PSA VOLATILITY INDEX (PVI)
& UPDATE ON PSA KINETICS
John Phillips, MD 19 November, 2010
New York Medical College Hackensack University Medical Center
203,415 men developed prostate cancer 28,372 men died from prostate cancer
J Mol Biol (2008), 376, 1021-33
•34 kD
•Serine protease
•19q13
•Kallikrein-related peptidase III
•Half-life total PSA 2-3 days
•Free PSA <8 hours
Serum Proteins
Alpha-2-macroglobulin
Alpha-Chymotrypsin
Free isoforms: B-PSA, I-PSA, and pro-PSA
SCR-270 Radar
Balancing true signal with interference
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)
Area Under Curve*
0.500= worthless
0.650=lukewarm
0.700=very good
0.800=outstanding*trapezoidal method
PSA cut-offs
•1986 “99% of healthy men < 4.0”
•1992 20-30% men > 4.0
•1994 24,000 screened q 6 months # cancers 2.6-4 identical to 4-10 ng/ml
•1995 6,691 men PSA 4.1 missed 82% of cancers in men <50
•2001 PSA 2.5 ng/ml for men <50
PSA cut-offs
•1986 “99% of healthy men < 4.0”
•1992 20-30% men > 4.0
•1994 24,000 screened q 6 months # cancers 2.6-4 identical to 4-10 ng/ml
•1995 6,691 men PSA 4.1 missed 82% of cancers in men <50
•2001 PSA 2.5 ng/ml for men <50
•Placebo arm of the 2004 PCPT trial
•<2.1 ng/ml 15 % of men had cancer
•Significant number had high grade disease
•Stacey Loeb 14,000 BLAS
•Median PSA 0.7 age 40-49: 0.7-2.5= 14.6 fold increased risk of prostate ca
•Median PSA 0.9 age 50-59: 0.9-2.5=7.6 fold increased risk of prostate ca
•AUA Guidelines•PSA testing begin at 40 years of age + DRE if > 10 year life expectancy
•Repeat PSA annually especially if above median for age
•Prostate Cancer exists at all PSA levels
•No absolute cut-off but PSA represents a “continuum of risk”
•PSA presents an odds to a patient, then they can determine comfort zone
Other Scalar Tests
• [-2] pro PSA AUC=.76 Sokoll et al. CEBM 2010• TMPRSS2-ERG• PSAD >0.155• TZ-PSAD• PCA3
Dynamic Tests
• PSA doubling time (PSAdt)• Classically described after radiation therapy• Originally identified as a surrogate for failure• PSA dt < 3 months associated with decreased CSS• PSA dt < 6 months associated with increased BCF• Difficult to calculate
i
PSAPSA
timetimein
n nn
nn
1 1
1
)log(
)(*2log
Dynamic Tests
• PSA Velocity • Carter B.L.S.A.• PSA < 4• PSAV was associated with CSS 25 years
later• 92 % survival <.35 ng/ml/yr• 54% survival >.35 ng/ml/yr• Loeb: 0.75 cut off PSA 4-10• 0.35 cut off PSA 2.5-4.0
Dynamic Tests• Can PSAV be used to help with screening?• Vickers et al. J U 184: 907-912 2010• European Randomized Screening Study for Prostate
Cancer ERSPC• N=2,742• Median PSA 4.47 vs 4.69 (No Ca versus Ca)• Median volume 47 vs 36 (No Ca versus Ca)• PSAV 0.26 vs 0.28 ng/ml/yr (No Ca versus Ca)• AUC PSA 0.522 PSAV 0.551 PSA+PSAV 0.621• “Little support for any clinically useful role for PSA velocity to help
determine initial biopsy”• “May be useful after an initial negative biopsy”
Dynamic Tests• Can PSAV be used as a trigger in active surveillance?• Andrew Loblaw et al. (Laurence Klotz’ group) JU 184: 1942, 2010• N=305 untreated men 6.1 years (range 0.5-13.3)• Zero prostate cancer deaths• Trigger for Treatment (TT)• PSA of 10 ng/ml TT 38% of the time• PSAV associated with TT 42-84% of the time• www.ASURE.com
PSA
• Incredibly useful
• Incredibly misused
• Multiple forms
• PSA, free PSA, proPSA
• PSAV, PSAdt, Ln(PSA)
• TMPRSS2ERG
• PCA3
Volatility: A measure of bidirectional variation over time
Volatility: A measure of bidirectional variation over time.
time, t
Volatility: A measure of bidirectional variation over time.
time, t
Volatility: A measure of bidirectional variation over time.
time, t
Volatile (Bidirectional) Variables
Options Pricing
Treasuries
Sunspot Activity
Global Warming
PSA
Source: Stockcharts.com
Volatile (Bidirectional) Variables
Options Pricing
Treasuries
Sunspot Activity
Global Warming
PSA
Source: Stockcharts.com
6-month-ahead Eurodollar rate (Rudebusch et al.)
Volatile (Bidirectional) Variables
Options Pricing
Treasuries
Sunspot Activity
Global Warming
PSA
Daily GOES readings: Nat’l Geophysical Data Canter
Volatile (Bidirectional) Variables
Options Pricing
Treasuries
Sunspot Activity
Global Warming
PSA
Source: Global Temperature Land-Ocean Index: Goddard Institute, NASA
Volatile (Bidirectional) Variables
Options Pricing
Treasuries
Sunspot Activity
Global Warming
PSA
PSA kinetics
• PSAV: 1 ng/dl/mo
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Year
PS
A
PSA velocity
• PSAV: How accurate with volatile PSAs?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Year
PS
A
• Same average PSA, , t-test
PSA velocity
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Year
PS
A
PSA velocity
PSA velocity
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Year
PS
A
PSA velocity
PSA velocity
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Year
PS
A
PSA velocity
PSA volatility
• Hypothesis : Can a PVI discriminate benign from malignant states?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Year
PS
A
PSA volatility (PVI)
INCLUSIONAt least 3 PSAsAt least 1 (one) prostate biopsy (TRUS or TP)
EXCLUSIONNo Urothelial CaNo h/o pelvic RTNo h/o hormone deprivation
PVI: Retrospective Study Population
Quantitating PVI
Q
QVolatility
t
t
1log
Financial Models
tNKet
trKsSNC rt
)2/()/ln( 2
(Black & Sholes, 1973)
(Rattray & Shah, 2003)
2
02
2 11
)(2
K
F
TKQe
K
K
T iRT
i i
i
PSA Volatility Index (PVI)
HYPOTHESIS
An e-based normalization for PSA scatter
and a PVI may predict Ca from BPH
slopee
SE
N1=932
Retrospective Study Population
N2=279
107 Cancer
172 BPH (e.g. BPH, atrophy, prostatitis, PIN)
Independent variables
Age, race, IPSS, ASA, Meds, TRUS data, Grade, volume/core, # cores, surgical pathology
aPSA, aPSAV, aPSAdt, PSAD, Ln(PSA), PVI
Descriptives
0
10
20
30
Jan-93 Oct-95 Jul-98 Apr-01 Jan-04 Oct-06 Jul-09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 May-05 Oct-06 Feb-08 Jul-09
Prostate Ca (n=107) BPH (n=179)
Total PSA ng/dl 1993-2010
BENIGN n=172 CANCER n=107 P-Value
Age 64.75 ± 8.67 65.14 ± 9.22 0.89
Caucasian (%) 82.94 80.95 0.85
ASA Class I-II (%) 66.48 64.58 0.88
ASA Class III-IV (%) 33.52 35.42
AUA-SS (0-40) 8.15 ± 5.67 6.42 ± 5.58 <.01
Nocturia (voids/night) 1.40 ± 1.16 1.38 ± 0.89 0.49
Study Interval (yrs) 5.10 ± 3.33 4.04 ± 2.96 <.01
Treated for LUTS (%) 58.82 48.82 0.07
Number of PSAs 6.90 ± 3.82 5.05 ± 2.78 <.01
Abnormal DRE (%) 13.69 20.41 0.15
TRUS vol (cc) 44.08 ± 25.01 40.24 ± 20.59 0.21
Number of Biopsies 1.75 ± 1.03 1.50 ± 0.88 0.06
Demographics
Descriptives
0
10
20
30
Jan-93 Oct-95 Jul-98 Apr-01 Jan-04 Oct-06 Jul-09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 May-05 Oct-06 Feb-08 Jul-09
BENIGN n=172 CANCER n=107 p-value
PSA ng/ml 5.60 ± 3.05 6.36 ± 5.53 0.7
free PSA (%) 19.78 ± 9.33 16.17 ± 8.51 0.04
PSAV ng/ml/yr -0.39 ± 6.28 0.71 ± 2.86 0.09
PSA dt (mo) 12.81 ± 336.95 241.28 ± 240.18 0.06
slope ln(PSA)*1000 -0.06 ± .00 0.38 ± 1.1 <.0001
PVI 1.56 ± 1.29 0.83 ± 0.83 <.0001
PSAD (ng/ml/cc) 0.15 ± 0.09 0.19 ± 0.20 .04
PVI Correlations
0
10
20
30
Jan-93 Oct-95 Jul-98 Apr-01 Jan-04 Oct-06 Jul-09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 May-05 Oct-06 Feb-08 Jul-09
X Y P value R2
PVI PSAV 0.11
PVI # biopsies 0.20
PVI IPSS 0.29
PVI BPH <0.00 .06
PVI PSAD <0.00 0.05
PVI Proscar <0.00 0.06
PVI Correlations
0
10
20
30
Jan-93 Oct-95 Jul-98 Apr-01 Jan-04 Oct-06 Jul-09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 May-05 Oct-06 Feb-08 Jul-09
X Y P value R2
PVI PSAV 0.11
PVI # biopsies 0.20
PVI IPSS 0.29
PVI BPH <0.00 .06
PVI PSAD <0.00 0.05
PVI Proscar <0.00 0.06
Linear Regression y=mx+b
Linear Regression y=mx+b
For each increase of 1 unit of x, y increases by 4.88 %
PSA volatility and % cancer
Or, as cancer volume decreases, PSA volatility increases
Logistic Regression = yes or no
zezf
1
1)(
For each change in x, the probability of the outcome goes up by y
Logistic Regression = yes or noUNIVARIATE
Coeff p-value
free PSA -0.05 0.05
PSAD 2.07 0.06
AUA SS -0.06 0.02
Ln(PSA)*1000† 1.43 <.001
PVI -0.77 <.001
MULTIVARIATE
Coeff p-value
Ln(PSA) + AUA SS 1.23 <.001
-0.05 0.05
PVI + AUA SS -0.78 <.001
-0.06 0.03
ROCs
AUC=.800
Nomograms=Prediction Tools
Nomograms=Prediction Tools
Formula for the oxygen consumption of rainbow trout as a function of weight and water temperature. Ron Doerfler Dead Reckonings
Nomograms=Prediction Tools
•Too Many Variables can Compromise the Model
•Increasing Complexity may Reduce Clinical Usefulness
•“Precision versus Parsimony”-Sengupta and Blute 2006
PVI Nomogram
PVI
•PVI > 2 benign, esp. in total PSA range 4-20
•PVI < 1 malignant
•PVI quantifies the PSA instability over time
•www.psastatistics.com
•Multivariable analysis
slopee
SE
WWW.PSASTATISTICS.COM/PVI
PVI
•PVI > 2 benign, esp. in total PSA range 4-20
•PVI < 1 malignant
•PVI quantifies the PSA instability over time
•www.psastatistics.com
•Multivariable analysis
slopee
SE
Thanks
Muhammad Choudhury, MD (NYMC)
Andrew Fishman, MD (NYMC)
Basir Tareen, MD (BIMC)
Harris Nagler, MD (BIMC)
Devesh Shah, PhD (Goldman Sachs)