ps10solution.pdf

2
Problem Set 10 Solution 17.881/882 December 6, 2004 1 Gibbons 3.2 (p.169) 1.1 Strategy Spaces Firm 1 has two types or two information sets and must pick an action for each type. Firm 2 has only one type and can only pick one action. The strategy spaces are: For Firm 1: {q 1 (a H ),q 1 (a L )}R + XR + . For Firm 2: q 2 R + 1.2 Bayesian Nash Equilibrium Let q 1 (a H ) and q 2 (a H ) denote rm 1’s quantity choices as a function of a j . Also let q 2 denote rm 2’s quantity choice. If demand is high, rm 1 will choose q 1 (a H ) to solve max q 1 [a H q 1 q 2 c]q 1 Similary, if demand is low, rm 1 will choose q 1 (a L ) to solve max q1 [a L q 1 q 2 c]q 1 Finally, rm 2 knows that a j = a H with probability θ and should anticipate that rm 1’s quantity choice will be q 1 (a H ) or q 1 (a L ) depending on a j . Thus rm 2 chooses q 2 to solve max q 2 θ[a H q 1 (a H ) q 2 c]q 2 + (1 θ)[a L q 1 (a L ) q 2 c]q 2 1

Transcript of ps10solution.pdf

Page 1: ps10solution.pdf

Problem Set 10 Solution

17.881/882December 6, 2004

1 Gibbons 3.2 (p.169)

1.1 Strategy Spaces

Firm 1 has two types or two information sets and must pick an action for eachtype. Firm 2 has only one type and can only pick one action.The strategy spaces are: For Firm 1: {q1(aH), q1(aL)} R+XR+. For Firm

2: q2 R+

1.2 Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

Let q∗1(aH) and q∗2(aH) denote firm 1’s quantity choices as a function of aj . Also

let q∗2 denote firm 2’s quantity choice.If demand is high, firm 1 will choose q∗1(aH) to solve

maxq1[aH − q1 − q∗2 − c]q1

Similary, if demand is low, firm 1 will choose q∗1(aL) to solve

maxq1[aL − q1 − q∗2 − c]q1

Finally, firm 2 knows that aj = aH with probability θ and should anticipatethat firm 1’s quantity choice will be q∗1(aH) or q

∗1(aL) depending on aj . Thus

firm 2 chooses q∗2 to solve

maxq2

θ[aH − q∗1(aH)− q2 − c]q2 + (1− θ)[aL − q∗1(aL)− q2 − c]q2

1

Page 2: ps10solution.pdf

The first-order conditions for these three optimization problems are the fol-lowing:

q∗1(aH) =aH − c− q∗2

2(1)

q∗1(aL) =aL − c− q∗2

2(2)

q∗2 =θ[aH − q∗1(aH)− c] + (1− θ)[aL − q∗1(aL)− c]

2(3)

3 can be rewritten, using 1 and 2, as:

q∗2 =[θaH + (1− θ)aL − c]1/2− q∗2/2

2(4)

=⇒ q∗2 =θaH + (1− θ)aL − c

3

Using 4, 1 and 2 can be rewritten, respectively, as:

q∗1(aH) =aH − c

3+ (1− θ)

aH − aL6

(5)

q∗1(aL) =aL − c

3− θ

aH − aL6

(6)

Thus, assuming that parameters are such that q∗2 , q∗1(aH), q

∗1(aL) as given

by 4, 5, 6 are all positive, then these equations characterize the Bayesian NashEquilibrium of this game.

2