Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

37
Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms HEINI MURER, NATI HERNANDO, IAN FORSTER, AND JU ¨ RG BIBER Institute of Physiology, University of Zu ¨ rich, Zu ¨ rich, Switzerland I. Introduction: Overall Mechanism 1373 A. Site of reabsorption 1374 B. Cellular mechanism 1374 II. Physiological Regulation 1375 A. Major factors 1375 B. Other factors 1375 III. Pathophysiological Alterations 1377 A. Genetic aspects 1378 B. “Acquired” alterations 1378 IV. Phosphate Transport Molecules in Proximal Tubular Cells 1378 A. Type I Na-P i cotransporter 1379 B. Type II Na-P i cotransporter 1380 C. Type III Na-P i cotransporter 1385 V. Type IIa Sodium-Phosphate Cotransporter: The Key Player in Brush-Border Membrane Phosphate Flux 1385 A. Transport characteristics 1386 B. Altered expression as the basis for altered P i reabsorption 1389 C. Cellular mechanisms in the control of type II Na-P i cotransporter expression 1393 VI. Summary and Outlook 1397 Murer, Heini, Nati Hernando, Ian Forster, and Ju ¨ rg Biber. Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms. Physiol Rev 80: 1373–1409, 2000.—Renal proximal tubular reabsorption of P i is a key element in overall P i homeostasis, and it involves a secondary active P i transport mechanism. Among the molecularly identified sodium-phosphate (Na/P i ) cotransport systems a brush-border membrane type IIa Na-P i cotransporter is the key player in proximal tubular P i reabsorption. Physiological and pathophysiological alterations in renal P i reabsorption are related to altered brush-border membrane expression/content of the type IIa Na-P i cotransporter. Complex membrane retrieval/insertion mechanisms are involved in modulating transporter content in the brush- border membrane. In a tissue culture model (OK cells) expressing intrinsically the type IIa Na-P i cotransporter, the cellular cascades involved in “physiological/pathophysiological” control of P i reabsorption have been explored. As this cell model offers a “proximal tubular” environment, it is useful for characterization (in heterologous expression studies) of the cellular/molecular requirements for transport regulation. Finally, the oocyte expression system has permitted a thorough characterization of the transport characteristics and of structure/function relationships. Thus the cloning of the type IIa Na-P i cotransporter (in 1993) provided the tools to study renal brush-border membrane Na-P i cotransport function/regulation at the cellular/molecular level as well as at the organ level and led to an understanding of cellular mechanisms involved in control of proximal tubular P i handling and, thus, of overall P i homeostasis. I. INTRODUCTION: OVERALL MECHANISM Renal handling of P i determines its concentration in the extracellular space, the “traffic” place between the two major body compartments: skeleton and intracellular space (37, 46, 101, 102, 216 –218, 374). In cells phosphate participates in energy metabolism and is a constituent of signaling molecules, lipids, and nucleic acids. Under “nor- mal” (“steady-state”) physiological conditions, urinary P i excretion corresponds roughly to phosphate intake in the alimentary tract, mainly via upper small intestine (37, 94, 101, 218). To fulfill the “homeostatic” function, i.e., keep- PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS Vol. 80, No. 4, October 2000 Printed in U.S.A. http://physrev.physiology.org 1373 0031-9333/00 $15.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society

Transcript of Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

Page 1: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption:Molecular Mechanisms

HEINI MURER, NATI HERNANDO, IAN FORSTER, AND JURG BIBER

Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

I. Introduction: Overall Mechanism 1373A. Site of reabsorption 1374B. Cellular mechanism 1374

II. Physiological Regulation 1375A. Major factors 1375B. Other factors 1375

III. Pathophysiological Alterations 1377A. Genetic aspects 1378B. “Acquired” alterations 1378

IV. Phosphate Transport Molecules in Proximal Tubular Cells 1378A. Type I Na-Pi cotransporter 1379B. Type II Na-Pi cotransporter 1380C. Type III Na-Pi cotransporter 1385

V. Type IIa Sodium-Phosphate Cotransporter: The Key Player in Brush-Border MembranePhosphate Flux 1385

A. Transport characteristics 1386B. Altered expression as the basis for altered Pi reabsorption 1389C. Cellular mechanisms in the control of type II Na-Pi cotransporter expression 1393

VI. Summary and Outlook 1397

Murer, Heini, Nati Hernando, Ian Forster, and Jurg Biber. Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption:Molecular Mechanisms. Physiol Rev 80: 1373–1409, 2000.—Renal proximal tubular reabsorption of Pi is a keyelement in overall Pi homeostasis, and it involves a secondary active Pi transport mechanism. Among the molecularlyidentified sodium-phosphate (Na/Pi) cotransport systems a brush-border membrane type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter isthe key player in proximal tubular Pi reabsorption. Physiological and pathophysiological alterations in renal Pi

reabsorption are related to altered brush-border membrane expression/content of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter.Complex membrane retrieval/insertion mechanisms are involved in modulating transporter content in the brush-border membrane. In a tissue culture model (OK cells) expressing intrinsically the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter, thecellular cascades involved in “physiological/pathophysiological” control of Pi reabsorption have been explored. Asthis cell model offers a “proximal tubular” environment, it is useful for characterization (in heterologous expressionstudies) of the cellular/molecular requirements for transport regulation. Finally, the oocyte expression system haspermitted a thorough characterization of the transport characteristics and of structure/function relationships. Thusthe cloning of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (in 1993) provided the tools to study renal brush-border membraneNa-Pi cotransport function/regulation at the cellular/molecular level as well as at the organ level and led to anunderstanding of cellular mechanisms involved in control of proximal tubular Pi handling and, thus, of overall Pi

homeostasis.

I. INTRODUCTION: OVERALL MECHANISM

Renal handling of Pi determines its concentration inthe extracellular space, the “traffic” place between thetwo major body compartments: skeleton and intracellularspace (37, 46, 101, 102, 216–218, 374). In cells phosphate

participates in energy metabolism and is a constituent ofsignaling molecules, lipids, and nucleic acids. Under “nor-mal” (“steady-state”) physiological conditions, urinary Pi

excretion corresponds roughly to phosphate intake in thealimentary tract, mainly via upper small intestine (37, 94,101, 218). To fulfill the “homeostatic” function, i.e., keep-

PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS

Vol. 80, No. 4, October 2000Printed in U.S.A.

http://physrev.physiology.org 13730031-9333/00 $15.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society

Page 2: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

ing extracellular Pi concentration within a narrow range,urinary Pi excretion must be (and is) under strong phys-iological control (37, 101, 102). In contrast to intestinal Pi

absorption, which adjusts rather “slowly” (for review, seeRefs. 94, 290), renal Pi excretion can “adjust” very fast toaltered physiological conditions.

A. Site of Reabsorption

Renal Pi excretion is the balance between free glo-merular filtration and regulated tubular reabsorption. Un-der normal physiological conditions, ;80–90% of filteredload is reabsorbed; renal tubular reabsorption occurs pri-marily in proximal tubules, with higher rates at earlysegments (S1/S2 vs. S3) and in deep nephrons (e.g., Refs.24, 142, 146, 159, 203, 232, 318; for review, see Refs. 37,218, 374). A small fraction of filtered Pi seems to bereabsorbed in the distal tubule (13), but the apparent lossof Pi observed after proximal tubular micropuncture sitescould be most likely explained by the higher reabsorptionin proximal tubules of deep nephrons (for review, see Ref.37). Therefore, a study/analysis of mechanisms participat-ing at the level of the kidney in control of Pi excretion canbe reduced to phenomena occurring in the proximal tu-bule.

B. Cellular Mechanism

The cellular mechanisms involved in proximal tubu-lar Pi reabsorption have been studied by a variety of

techniques including in vivo and in vitro microperfusions(e.g., Refs. 24, 49, 99, 100, 142, 144, 402), tissue-culturetechniques (e.g., Refs. 41, 43, 64, 66, 67, 116, 261, 264), andstudies with isolated brush-border and basolateral mem-brane vesicles (e.g., Refs. 18, 22, 23, 33–35, 44, 52, 53, 55,76, 78, 80, 88, 95, 98, 118, 127, 143, 148, 149, 152, 153, 155,179–182, 204, 239–241, 245, 246, 255, 256, 278, 291, 321,324, 328, 352, 355, 356, 360, 370–372, 375, 392, 400, 401,410, 429–434). We and others have written previouslyseveral comprehensive reviews on cellular mechanismsparticipating in renal tubular handling of Pi and summa-rized the experiments with above-mentioned techniques(e.g., Refs. 37, 46, 100, 101, 138, 149, 278, 282, 283, 291).From these studies a secondary active transport schemeemerged (see Fig. 1, left). Pi is taken up from the tubularfluid by (a) brush-border membrane sodium/phosphate(Na-Pi) cotransporter(s) and leaves the cell via basolat-eral transport pathways. The brush-border entry step isthe rate-limiting step and the target for almost all physi-ological (and pathophysiological) mechanisms altering Pi

reabsorption (see below). Basolateral exit is ill defined,and several Pi transport pathways have been postulatedincluding Na-Pi cotransport, anion exchange, and even an“unspecific” Pi leak (channel?). Basolateral Pi transporthas to serve at least two functions: 1) complete transcel-lular Pi reabsorption in a case where luminal Pi entryexceeds the cellular Pi requirements and 2) guaranteebasolateral Pi influx if apical Pi entry is insufficient tosatisfy cellular requirements. The second can be consid-ered as a “house-keeping” function and might not bespecific for (re)absorptive cells. In this review we sum-

FIG. 1. Scheme for proximal tubular Pi reabsorption. Left: concept of secondary active transport as evidenced bymicroperfusion studies and studies on isolated membrane vesicles. Right: Na-Pi cotransporter molecules in the proximaltubular epithelial cell. For further details and references, see text. [Adapted from Murer et al. (288).]

1374 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 3: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

marize the present knowledge on the key transportermolecules involved in proximal tubular transmembrane Pi

movement (apical and basolateral; see Fig. 1, right).

II. PHYSIOLOGICAL REGULATION

As already indicated, regulation of proximal tubularPi reabsorption and thus of brush-border membrane Na-Pi

cotransport codetermines overall Pi homeostasis. Again,many reviews summarizing the regulation of proximaltubular Pi reabsorption at the organ, tubule, cell, andmembrane levels have been written (37, 46, 138, 282–289,292). This information is briefly presented here. In thisreview we focus on the molecular mechanisms underlyingthese regulations.

For a brief overview on regulatory events, we focuson major factors and other factors, and the latter is sub-divided into hormonal and nonhormonal factors control-ling proximal tubular Pi reabsorption (see Ref. 37). Foreach of these regulatory phenomena, a “memory” effectexists, i.e., the changes are induced by adequate pretreat-ment, and after characterization (e.g., by clearance tech-niques) in vivo can then be further analyzed in vitro, e.g.,in microperfusion studies or in studies with isolated mem-brane vesicles (for review, see Refs. 37, 46, 138, 282, 283,287). This memory effect can at present easily be under-stood, as physiological regulation of Pi reabsorption in-volves, as far as they have been studied at the molecularlevel, an altered expression of a brush-border Na-Pi co-transporter protein (type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter; for re-view, see Refs. 39, 242, 284–289, 292; see below). There-fore, they are in all cases, with the possible exception of“fasting” (204), related to changes in maximum velocity(Vmax) of brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport ac-tivity in isolated brush-border membrane vesicles (forreview, see Refs. 37, 46, 107, 206, 283).

A. Major Factors

1. Dietary Pi intake

A low dietary Pi intake can lead to an almost 100%reabsorption of filtered Pi, whereas a high dietary Pi in-take leads to a decreased proximal tubular Pi reabsorp-tion (for review, see Refs. 37, 218). These changes canoccur independent of changes in the plasma concentra-tion of different phosphaturic hormones (for review, seeRefs. 37, 218; see also Refs. 7, 9, 316). Thus an “unknown”humoral factor may be involved in the mediation of theseeffects. However, as evidenced by studies on culturedrenal proximal tubular epithelial cells (e.g., OK cells), adirect effect (“intrinsic”) of altered Pi concentration in theextracellular fluid (plasma, glomerular filtrate, culturemedia) also elicits changes in apical (brush-border) mem-

brane Na-Pi cotransport activity (e.g., Refs. 41, 43, 64, 309,339).

2. Parathyroid hormone

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) induces phosphaturia byinhibiting brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport ac-tivity; removal of PTH (parathyroidectomy) leads to anincrease in Na-Pi cotransport activity (e.g., Refs. 108, 120,153; for review, see Refs. 37, 46, 101, 138, 206, 218, 283,292). These effects can also be analyzed in a tissue-culturemodel to study cellular/molecular mechanisms involvedin proximal tubular Pi handling, in opossum kidney cells(OK cells; Refs. 67, 85, 86, 261–264, 267, 268, 307, 308, 310,311, 341–345). This in vitro model also provided evidencefor cAMP-dependent and cAMP-independent signalingmechanisms in PTH action (see below; see also Refs. 85,86, 235, 264, 308, 329–333; for review, see Refs. 280, 283,288, 289).

3. Vitamin D

Vitamin D is suggested to increase/stimulate proxi-mal tubular Pi reabsorption. 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalcif-erol treatment of rats was found to stimulate brush-bor-der membrane Na-Pi cotransport (226, 227). It is,however, difficult to discriminate between direct versusindirect effects, as in vivo the vitamin D status is closelyassociated with alterations in plasma calcium and PTHconcentrations (for review, see Refs. 37, 46, 101, 107).Thus, at present, it is not clear whether 1,25-dihydroxyvi-tamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3] directly regulates mammalianbrush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport. This is in con-trast to the upper small intestine where 1,25(OH)2D3 stim-ulates brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (for re-view, see Refs. 94, 290). In chicken tubular preparations,administration of 1,25(OH)2D3 increased Pi uptake, aneffect prevented by inhibition of protein synthesis (249,250). However, in these studies in suspended cells, it isnot clear whether the stimulation is related to an in-creased uptake across the brush-border membrane. It hasbeen suggested that the effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 are relatedto changes in the lipid characteritsics of the membrane(114; for review, see Refs. 21, 37). A stimulatory effect of1,25(OH)2D3 was also observed in a subclone of OK cellsand in studies on promoter activation (see sect. VC; Refs.8, 380).

B. Other Factors

1. Hormonal factors

There are additional hormonal factors (e.g., insulin,growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I/other growthfactors, thyroid and other lipophilic hormones, calcitonin,glucocorticoids, atrial natriuretic peptide, nerve transmit-

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1375

Page 4: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

ters, prostaglandins, parathyroid hormone-related pep-tide, phosphatonin, and stanniocalcin) with reported ef-fects on proximal tubular Pi reabsorption, i.e., brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (for review, see Refs.37, 101, 107, 206, 283).

A) INSULIN. Insulin enhances proximal tubular Pi reab-sorption by stimulation of brush-border membrane Na-Pi

cotransport and prevents the phosphaturic action of PTH(e.g., Ref. 155; for review, see Refs. 37, 150, 206). Specificbinding sites for insulin have been identified in basolat-eral membranes of proximal tubular epithelial cells (154,155; for review, see Ref. 150).

B) GROWTH HORMONE/INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR I/OTHER

GROWTH FACTORS. Growth hormone, at least in part medi-ated by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I; locally pro-duced in the kidney), stimulates proximal tubular Na-Pi

cotransport (e.g., Refs. 65, 153, 281, 335; for review, seeRefs. 37, 150, 206), an effect also observed in OK cells (63,193). Receptors for growth hormone have been identifiedon the basolateral membrane of proximal tubular cellsand appear to activate the phospholipase C pathway(350). Receptors for IGF-I have also been identified inproximal tubular cell membranes, and associated effectsmay involve tyrosine kinase activity (151, 154; for review,see Ref. 150).

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulates Pi reab-sorption in perfused proximal tubules (336, 337) but in-hibits Pi transport in LLC-PK1 and OK cells (15, 140, 314).These effects are independent of cAMP and may involvetyrosine kinase activity and/or phospholipase C activation(see below; for review, see Ref. 206).

Transforming growth factors [i.e., transforminggrowth factor-a (TGF-a)] decrease Na-Pi cotransport ac-tivity in OK cells (233, 314). These effects are independentof cAMP, and the mechanisms might be similar to those inEGF action, sharing the same receptor (TGF-a and EGF;for review, see Refs. 150, 206).

C) THYROID HORMONE/LIPOPHILIC HORMONES. Thyroid hor-mone stimulates proximal tubular Pi reabsorption via aspecific increase in brush-border membrane Na-Pi co-transport (31, 118, 213, 433, 434; for review, see Refs. 37,107). The effect of thyroid hormone can also be observedin primary cultured chick renal cells and in OK cells andis dependent on protein synthesis (298, 367).

There are additional lipophilic hormones with re-ported effects on “renal tubular” Pi transport. All-trans-

retinoic acid (CatRA) specifically increases Na-Pi cotrans-port in OK cells (30; for review, see Ref. 107). On the otherhand, b-estradiol specifically decreases Na-Pi cotransportin brush-border membranes from adequately pretreatedrats (32; for review, see Ref. 107).

D) CALCITONIN. Calcitonin reduces proximal tubularbrush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport in a PTH- andcAMP-independent manner (36, 430, 436; for review, seeRefs. 37, 206). This effect might be mediated by a rise in

intracellular calcium concentration (for review, see Ref.37).

E) GLUCOCORTICOIDS. Glucocorticoids increase phos-phate excretion by an inhibition of proximal tubularbrush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (47, 127; seealso Ref. 411); this effect can occur independent of anincrease in PTH (for review, see Ref. 37). The effects ofglucocorticoids are also apparent in vitro, in primarychick proximal tubular cells (299), and in OK cells (192;see also Refs. 156a, 319, 320). An increase in plasmaglucocorticoid levels may mediate the phosphaturic re-sponse in chronic metabolic acidosis (11, 47, 127; forreview, see Ref. 37).

F) ATRIAL NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE. Atrial natriuretic peptide(ANP) also inhibits proximal tubular brush-border mem-brane Na-Pi cotransport (156, 429). Although a small ef-fect of ANP, mediated by a rise in cGMP, was observed onOK cell Na-Pi cotransport (294), a direct effect on proxi-mal tubular cells is questionable, since receptors for ANPwere not identified in proximal tubular epithelial cells (forreview, see Ref. 37). An increase in renal dopamine pro-duction (see below) could mediate, in the intact organ,the effect of ANP on brush-border membrane Na-Pi co-transport (for review, see Ref. 37; see also Ref. 419).

G) PTH-RELATED PEPTIDE. PTH-related peptide producedby tumors causes phosphaturia. This “PTH analog” causesphosphaturia by mechanisms identical to that involved inPTH action (for review, see Refs. 37, 206; see also Refs.315, 349).

H) PHOSPHATONIN. Studies in patients with tumor-in-duced osteomalacia, with associated hypophosphatemiaand renal Pi wasting, led to the hypothesis that there is anadditional humoral factor controlling serum Pi concentra-tion and renal Pi handling (for review, see Refs. 37, 111,224, 225). This as yet unidentified factor was named phos-phatonin and is suggested to inhibit proximal tubular Pi

reabsorption (60). It was observed that conditioned cul-ture media from tumor cells derived from patients inhib-ited OK cell Na-Pi cotransport. This factor (phosphato-nin?) was suggested to have a proteinous nature and amolecular weight between 8,000 and 25,000. The inhibi-tion of Na-Pi cotransport occurred independently ofchanges in cellular cAMP content. Also, a PTH-receptorantagonist was found (but not identified; PTH related) inthese culture media; it interfered with PTH inhibition ofOK cell Na-Pi cotransport but not with the inhibitoryeffect of phosphatonin (for review, see Refs. 37, 111, 224,225).

I) GLUCAGON. Glucagon administration increases Pi ex-cretion. It was suggested that the effect of pharmacolog-ical doses of glucagon is indirect and related to an in-crease in plasma concentration of liver-derived cAMP (3).

J) STANNIOCALCIN. Two different isoforms of stanniocal-cin (STC) were identified and suggested to be involved incalcium and phosphate homeostasis in fish and in mam-

1376 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 5: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

mals. STC-1 was originally identified in fish and later in ratkidney, in more distally located nephron segments (420).STC-2, ;34% amino acid similarity to STC-1 (189), wasidentified from an osteosarcoma library, and related tran-scripts were found in different tissues including kidney(72, 105, 189). STC-1 stimulates proximal tubular brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (409); STC-2 has atleast in vitro (OK cells), the opposite effect, by a suppres-sion of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (189). Thus STC-1/2 may serve paracrine modulators of Pi reabsorption.

K) PROSTAGLANDIN. Prostaglandins, produced intrare-nally, also modulate renal Pi handling. PGE2 antagonizesthe phosphaturia observed under different physiologicalconditions, e.g., increased PTH levels. This effect is inpart, but not fully, explained by effects on the cAMPsignaling cascade. The latter is illustrated by the observa-tion that inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis (byindomethacin) potentiates the cAMP-independent phos-phaturic action of calcitonin (36; for review, see Ref. 37).

L) NERVE TRANSMITTERS. Nerve transmitters also appearto control renal proximal tubular Na-Pi cotransport. Acuterenal denervation increases renal Pi excretion, indepen-dent of the PTH status (for review, see Ref. 37). Theseeffects can be related to the production of dopamineand/or reduced a- or b-adenoreceptor activity. Dopamineand its precursor L-dopa increase Pi excretion (104, 187,188) and inhibit Na-dependent Pi transport in OK cells aswell as in isolated rabbit proximal tubules (19, 79, 104,129, 137, 196). Dopamine can be generated from L-dopaafter brush-border membrane uptake of g-glutamyl-L-dopaand leads in an autocrine/paracrine manner via a stimu-lation of adenylate cyclase to the inhibition of brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (104). Stimulation ofa-adenoreceptors might interfere with hormone-depen-dent stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity (e.g., byPTH) and might therefore lead to an apparent increase inNa-Pi cotransport activity, and explain a hypophosphatu-ric action of a-agonists (70, 403, 422, 423; see also Ref.234). In addition, stimulation of a-adenoreceptors in OKcells blunted the actions of PTH on cAMP production andinhibition of Na-Pi cotransport (77; see also Ref. 103).Serotonin is also synthesized in the proximal tubules andis antiphosphaturic; it stimulates proximal tubular Pi re-absorption (103, 128, 129, 147).

Adenosine infusion in rats stimulates renal Pi reab-sorption (312).

2. Nonhormonal factors

In addition to above hormonal factors, there are sev-eral nonhormonal factors known to affect proximal tubu-lar Na-Pi cotransport.

A) FASTING. Fasting may result in phosphaturia andreverse the effects of a low-Pi diet (for review, see Ref. 37;see also Ref. 28). This effect relates also to a change in

brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (204). In con-trast to dietary Pi-induced changes and other regulatoryconditions, the lowered Pi uptake under fasting condi-tions might be explained by an increase in the apparentMichaelis constant (Km) value for Pi (204). The effect offasting may involve, but cannot be explained by, an in-crease in glucagon levels (for review, see Ref. 37).

B) PLASMA CALCIUM. Changes in plasma calcium lead tochanges in renal proximal tubular Pi reabsorption that areprimarily associated with the corresponding changes inPTH concentration (12, 421; for review, see Ref. 37).However, in vitro data also suggest a direct cellular effectof extracellular calcium on proximal tubular brush-bordermembrane Na-Pi cotransport (e.g., Ref. 301). In isolatedperfused convoluted rabbit proximal tubules, an increasein bath and perfusate calcium concentration provoked anincrease in Pi reabsorption (351). In studies on OK cells,opposite data were obtained: a decrease in medium cal-cium concentration stimulated Na-Pi cotransport (62).These differences are not understood but might be relatedto the time scale used in the experiments. The effects inOK cells required prolonged exposure, were dependenton protein synthesis, and may be related to changes inintracellular Ca21 concentration (see sect. VC4; see alsoRef. 353).

C) ACID BASE. The influence of changes in systemicacid-base status on renal proximal tubular Na-Pi cotrans-port are rather complex and are summarized only briefly.The effects on the kinetic properties of the carrier arediscussed in section VA4; in brief, an alkaline intratubularpH leads to a stimulation of Na-Pi cotransport (14, 328,334, 352; for review, see Refs. 37, 138, 216–218, 283).Acute metabolic acidosis does not significantly interferewith Pi reabsorption. In contrast, chronic metabolic aci-dosis leads to a decrease in Na-Pi cotransport, most likelyrelated to the evaluated glucocorticoid levels (11, 47, 127).These effects are also apparent in OK cells followingappropriate changes in media pH conditions (192, 194).Respiratory acidosis leads to phosphaturia involving cor-responding changes in Na-Pi cotransport. In contrast, re-spiratory alkalosis stimulates proximal tubular Pi reab-sorption (for review, see Ref. 37).

D) VOLUME EXPANSION. Volume expansion of animal in-creases Pi excretion and decreases Na-Pi cotransportrates in isolated brush-border membrane vesicles and inisolated perfused proximal tubules (74, 313, 317, 323, 324;for review, see Ref. 37). It is assumed that the effect ofvolume expansion on proximal tubules is indirect (i.e., viasome humoral factors, in part ANP and/or dopamine).

III. PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS

In addition to the above briefly discussed physiolog-ical regulatory mechanisms, that adjust brush-border

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1377

Page 6: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

Na-Pi cotransport to the needs of body Pi homeostasis,there are genetically determined alterations in renal Pi

handling and “acquired” alterations in renal Pi reabsorp-tion.

A. Genetic Aspects

The genetic aspects of proximal tubular Na-Pi co-transport have been covered in many reviews (e.g., Refs.338, 384, 390), and we only mention those disorders thathave been characterized at the molecular level. Severalgenetic defects resulting in isolated renal phosphate wast-ing have been described, such as X-linked hypophos-phatemic rickets (XLH; e.g., Refs. 295, 384, 385), autoso-mal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets not associatedwith hypercolcinuria (ADHR, 110, 113), and hereditaryhypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria (HHRH;136, 394). The first is caused by mutations in the PHEX

gene, which has homology to neutral endopeptidasegenes and is hypothesized to process or degrade a circu-lating factor that regulates by an unknown mechanismrenal brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (see be-low; for review, see Refs. 110, 112, 384, 390). A candidategene for ADHR and/or HHRH could be the brush-bordermembrane Na-Pi cotransporter (see below). However, thegene involved in ADHR was recently mapped to chromo-some 12p13 (113), a gene locus different from the brush-border Na-Pi cotransporter (5q35; 222, 223; see below).Although HHRH has the biochemical features of micewith a gene deletion for the brush-border membrane Na-Pi

cotransporter (25; see below), recent studies on a bedouinkindred with HHRH do not support the hypothesis of adirect involvement of the transporter gene in HHRH (A. O.Jones, I. Tzenova, T. M. Fujiwara, D. Frapier, M. Tieder, K.Morgan, and H. S. Tenenhouse, unpublished data). Aninteresting form of a genetically determined reduction inrenal Pi handling is in Dent’s disease, where mutations ina chloride channel (CLC5) lead to an apparent Pi trans-port defect (252; for review, see Ref. 391). How the loss offunction of an endosomal chloride channel leads to adecreased brush-border Na-Pi cotransport needs to bedetermined. Other genetic defects in renal Pi handling aresecondary to changes in vitamin D, PTH, or acid/basemetabolism or are a consequence of more general meta-bolic disorders (for review, see Refs. 109, 216, 217, 338,390).

B. Acquired Alterations

Disturbances in proximal tubular Pi transport seemto be an early indicator of “nonspecific” proximal tubularalterations, occurring as a consequence of “unphysiolog-ical” extrarenal factors (for review, see Refs. 216, 217).This may be explained by the specific kinetic properties of

the brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransporter (seesect. VH). An example of this may be the observed phos-phaturia when the filtered load of glucose is augmented(in diabetes mellitus), where a “competition” for drivingforce will reduce Na-Pi cotransport rate (22, 392). Moregenerally speaking, when driving forces across the brush-border membrane (Na1 gradient and/or membrane poten-tial) are altered, the transport of phosphate will be re-duced and thus phosphaturia will occur. Furthermore, aspart of its physiological regulation, the transporter pro-tein mediating the rate-limiting Na-Pi cotransport has ahigh turnover. Therefore, “damage” to the brush-bordermembrane or the transporter protein itself will result in amassive reduction in the brush-border membrane contentof Na-Pi cotransporters and thus reduce Pi transport lead-ing to phosphaturia. This may explain, for example, thesensitivity of renal Pi reabsorption to heavy metal intox-ication (see Refs. 4, 141, 169).

Diuretics may inhibit proximal tubular Pi reabsorp-tion when administered to animals or intact tubular prep-arations (for review, see Ref. 37). Because the greatesteffect is produced by acetazolamide, it is assumed thatinhibition is related to an inhibition of carbonic anhy-drase; therefore, the effect is also dependent on the pres-ence of bicarbonate. The effect of other diuretics onproximal tubular Pi reabsorption correlates to some ex-tent with their potency to inhibit carbonic anhydrase.Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase leads to acute and/orchronic changes in systemic and/or tubular pH, which inturn causes the changes in Pi reabsorption.

IV. PHOSPHATE TRANSPORT MOLECULES

IN PROXIMAL TUBULAR CELLS

The cellular scheme for proximal tubular Pi reabsorp-tion given above includes three Na-Pi cotransporters (Fig.1). They have been molecularly identified and have beennamed type I, type II, and type III Na-Pi cotransporters(175; for review, see Refs. 284–289, 377). However, theremay be additional pathways in the brush-border and ba-solateral membranes that have not yet been defined at themolecular level. In heterologous expression systems (e.g.,Xenopus laevis oocytes), the corresponding cRNA/pro-teins augment highly Na1-dependent Pi uptake. The threefamilies of Na-Pi cotransporters share no significant ho-mology at the level of their primary amino acid sequence(Fig. 2 and Table 1). We discuss the structural properties,tissue expression, and functional characteristics of thesethree families of Na-Pi cotransporters. Because the typeIIa Na-Pi cotransporter is the key player (see sect. V), thekinetic properties and the regulatory behavior of the typeIIa transporter are then covered separately and in moredetail.

1378 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 7: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

A. Type I Na-Pi Cotransporter

A cDNA related to the type I Na-Pi cotransporter wasinitially identified by screening a rabbit kidney cortexlibrary for expression of Pi transport activity in X. laevis

oocytes (416). Homologous cDNA (and in part proteins)were then found in human, mouse, and rat kidney cortex,in cerebellar granular cells, and in Caenorhabditis el-

egans (81, 82, 247, 248, 276, 277, 296, 297; for review, seeRef. 414).

The gene encoding the type I cotransporter (NPT 1)maps in humans to chromosome 6 p21.3-p23 (82, 223), inmouse to chromosome 13 close to the Tcrg locus (81,

437), and in rabbits to chromosome 12p11 (223). Thepromoter organization of NPT 1 has been characterized;104 bp upstream of exon 1, a single transcription start sitewas found and a TATA-like sequence at 241 (378).

Type I transporter mRNA has been detected by in situhybridization in mouse kidney proximal tubules and to alesser extent also in distal tubules (81). In rabbits, RT-PCR of microdissected tubular segments localized type ImRNA to the proximal tubules (92). Immunohistochemi-cal experiments and studies with isolated membraneslocalized the type I transporter protein to the proximaltubular brush-border membrane in rabbits and in mice(40; M. Lotscher, J. Biber, and H. Murer, unpublished

FIG. 2. Hydrophobicity predic-tions for the type I, type II, and typeIII Na-Pi cotransporters. Shaded areasindicate potential transmembranesegments. Sequence similarities areindicated by the vertical bars. For fur-ther discussion and references, seetext.

TABLE 1. The three families of Na-Pi cotransporters

Family Name Type I

Type II

Type IIIType IIa Type IIb

Molecule name NaPi-I, rabbit, rat, mouse, orhuman (NaPi-1, NPT1,

Npt1)

NaPi-IIa, mouse, rat,human, rabbit, oropossum (NaPi-2/3/4/6/7)

NaPi-IIb, mouse,human, flounder, orXenopus (NaPi-5)

Glvr-1 (PiT-1)Ram-1 (PiT-2)human, mouse, rat

Chromosomal location(human)

6 5 4 2 (PiT-1)8 (PiT-2)

Amino acids ;465 ;640 ;690 679, 656Predicted

transmembranesegments

6–8 8 8 10

Function (in Xenopus

oocytes)Na-Pi cotransport, Cl channel

activity, interaction withorganic anions

Na-Pi cotransport,electrogenic, pHdependent

Na-Pi cotransport,electrogenic

Na-Pi cotransport,electrogenic

Substrate Pi, organic anions Pi Pi Pi

Affinity for Pi ;1.0 mM 0.1–0.2 mM 0.05 mM 0.025 mMAffinity for Na1 50–60 mM 50–70 mM 33 mM 40–50 mMNa1-Pi coupling .1 3 3 3pH dependence Stimulated at high pH “Decreased” at high pH “Decreased” at high pHTissue expression

(mRNA protein)Kidney cortex/PT, liver, brain Kidney cortex/PT Small intestine, lung,

and other tissuesUbiquitous

Regulated by PTH/Pi diet No PTH and Pi diet Pi diet (Pi diet)

PT, parathyroid; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1379

Page 8: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

observations). Studies on brush-border membranes pro-vided evidence for a higher expression in “deep” jux-tamedullary compared with superficial nephrons (97).

On the basis of hydropathy predictions, the type INa-Pi cotransporter protein may contain six to eight trans-membrane regions (Fig. 2); it contains three N-glycosyla-tion motifs of which some are used as indicated by im-munoblotting studies with isolated brush-bordermembrane vesicles and by in vitro translation experi-ments (416; for review, see Refs. 285, 284, 414).

The induction of increased Na-Pi cotransport activityafter injection into X. laevis oocytes was the basis for theexpression cloning of the cDNA encoding the type I Na-Pi

cotransporter cDNA (416). Stable transfection of type Itransporter cDNA into Madin-Darby canine kidney(MDCK) and LLC-PK1 cells resulted also in an increasedcellular uptake of Pi (325). Na1-dependent Pi uptake,induced after expression of the type I transporter in oo-cytes, has been extensively characterized (50, 56, 276, 297,416). The apparent Km for Pi was ;0.3 mM for expressionof the human and ;1 mM for the rabbit type I Na-Pi

cotransporter. The apparent Km value for Na1 interactionwas ;50 mM,with a Hill coefficient exceeding unity. Fur-thermore, no pH dependence of type I transporter-medi-ated Na1-dependent Pi uptake could be observed in oo-cytes. In electrophysiological studies in oocytes, evidencewas obtained that the type I transporter protein might bemultifunctional, since evidence for anion channel func-tion with permeability for chloride and different organicanions was obtained (50, 57). In the oocyte experiments itwas observed that the induction of chloride conductionby expression of the type I transporter cDNA was timeand dose dependent, in contrast to Na1-dependent Pi

uptake, which was maximally increased at low doses ofinjected cRNA and after short time periods of expression(50). This could suggest that the type I transporter proteinmay modulate an intrinsic “oocyte” Na-Pi uptake activity,present not only in oocytes, and that the type I transporter

protein may or may not be a Na-Pi cotransporter itself butrather an anion channel protein with expression in renalbrush-border membrane. Its role in proximal tubular se-cretion of anions (e.g., organic anions, xenobiotics) needsto be determined. Certainly, the above-described charac-teristics of type I transporter-induced Na1-dependent Pi

uptake does not resemble the characteristics of Na1-dependent Pi uptake in brush-border membrane vesicles(e.g., Ref. 14; for review, see Refs. 138, 283). Therefore,the type I transporter is not a major player in mediating orcontrolling brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport.

Yabuuchi et al. (426) have studied in more detail theanion conductive properties of the type I Na-Pi cotrans-porter (human Npt 1). In oocytes, benzylpenicillin, b-lac-tam antibiotics, probenecid, foscarnet, and melavonicacid were transport substrates. In the hepatocytes, Npt 1

was located on the sinusoidal membrane (426).To establish the physiological role of NPT 1 in above

anion secretion (as well as in renal Pi handling), genedeletion experiments are required (H. S. Tenenhouse andI. Soummounou, personal communication).

B. Type II Na-Pi Cotransporter

The cDNA encoding the type II (type IIa) Na-Pi co-transporter was identified by expression cloning in X.

laevis oocytes, from rat and human kidney cortex librar-ies, respectively (260). Homology-based approaches thenled to the identification of type II-related transporters inkidneys from different species including flounder andzebrafish, in opossum kidney cells (OK cells), and in abovine epithelial cell line (NBL-1; Refs. 87, 88, 163, 168,219, 294a, 366, 405, 417; see also Fig. 3). A type II-relatedNa-Pi cotransporter was identified in apical membranes ofmammalian small intestine and type II pneumocytes (121,175, 396) and has been designated type IIb Na-Pi cotrans-porter (Table 1). The regions with highest homology be-

FIG. 3. Proximal tubular expres-sion of the type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter protein (left) and mRNA(right). The protein shows a luminaland some distinct intracellular local-ization. The mRNA is also exclusivelylocated in the proximal tubules. P,proximal tubules; G, glomeruli; D, dis-tal tubules. For comparison, see alsoFigures 11 and 12. For details, seetext and references given in the text.

1380 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 9: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

tween type IIa and type IIb transporters are in transmem-brane domains, and regions with no or little homology areat the cytoplasmic NH2 and COOH termini (Fig. 4; Ref.175).

Werner et al. (414) compared the sequences of thetype II Na-Pi cotransporters (Fig. 5) and three “families”were identified. Interestingly, the type IIa transporter ispreferentially expressed in kidney, with a proximal tubu-lar apical location (see sect. VB1). The type IIb transportercan have multiple locations; in mammals, it is expressedin the small intestine, type II pneumocytes, and othertissues, whereas in nonmammalian vertebrates it can beeither in the kidney and/or small intestine (175, 190, 219,

294a, 396). A type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter appears to beexpressed also in osteoclasts and may play a role in boneresorption (145). A type II Na-Pi cotransporter seems alsoto be expressed in brain, where the function is not yetestablished (177). Finally, type II related proteins ap-peared very early in evolution, and related genes werefound in Vibrio cholerae and C. elegans (see Fig. 5; forreview, see Ref. 414).

1. Chromosomal location/genomic organization

The human type IIa cotransporter gene (NPT 2) mapsto chromosome 5q35 (Fig. 6; Refs. 222, 223, 269, 277) and

FIG. 4. Sequence comparisons between type IIa and type IIb Na-Pi cotransporters. Predicted transmembrane areasare given by black bars above the sequences and show high sequence homologies. For further discussion, see text andincluded references. [Adapted from Hilfiker et al. (175).]

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1381

Page 10: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

the murine (Npt 2) gene to chromosome 13B (437). Thehuman type IIb Na-Pi cotransporter maps to chromosome4p15–16 (418a).

The genomic structure of NPT 2 (human IIa) and Npt

2 (murine IIa) has been determined; they are ;16 kb inlength and consist of 13 exons and 12 introns (Fig. 6; Refs.162, 379). In the promoter region of the human, murineand OK cell NPT 2/Npt 2 gene, a TATA box is present 31bp upstream from the transcription start sites. A GCAATelement and several AP-1 sites may control promoteractivity (162, 379). The NPT 2/Npt 2 promoter is activeonly in a proximal tubular environment, i.e., in OK cells(162, 174, 176). 59-Flanking sequences of the OK cell typeII Na-Pi cotransporter gene contain elements mediatingtranscriptional control under different bicarbonate/car-bon dioxide tensions (194). For the rat Npt 2 promoter, animportant role of repeating AP-2 consensus sites in regu-

lating cell-specific expression was documented (359). Inreporter gene studies, no physiological regulation (e.g., bylow-Pi medium, PTH, thyroid hormones, and growth fac-tors) was observed using a short promoter (327 bp) frag-ment (174, 176). However, in COS-7 cells expressing thehuman vitamin D receptor, a vitamin D response elementwas observed at ;2 kb upstream from the transcriptioninitiation site of the NPT 2/Npt 2 gene (380). Furthermore,regulatory sequences within the NPT 2 gene, ;1 kb up-stream of the transcription start site, were identified asbinding sites to nuclear proteins upregulated in kidneys ofweaning mice fed a low-Pi diet (212a). The correspondingDANN-binding protein could be identified; it correspondsto a known transcription factor (TFE3) that activatestranscription through the mE3 site of the immunoglobinheavy chain enhancer (212a). The mRNA encoding TFE3was found to be significantly increased in kidney tissuesof weaning mice fed a low-Pi diet (212a).

2. Tissue-specific expression

In situ hybridization of renal sections (Fig. 3) andnephron microdissection, followed by RT-PCR, docu-mented that type IIa mRNA expression is restricted to thekidney proximal tubule (87, 91, 348, 388). Therefore, inmouse kidney, the type IIa is by far the most abundant ofknown Na-Pi cotransporters (388). Type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter protein is found in the brush-border membrane ofproximal tubules (see Fig. 3; Refs. 91, 348). Inter- andintranephron distribution type of IIa Na-Pi cotransporterhighly depends on the physiological requirements withinoverall Pi homeostasis, (see Figs. 3 and 11; Refs. 91, 210,243, 348; for review, see Refs. 242, 284–287). The type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter is also expressed in OK cells but notin other renal cell lines (310, 311, 366, 386, 424; and J.Forgo, G. Strange, J. Biber, and H. Murer, unpublishedobservations). Recently, a type IIa transporter protein-related immunoreactivity was observed in membranefractions isolated from nontransformed immortalizedmice kidney cortex epithelial cells (71). There is no evi-dence that the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter is expressed inprimary renal proximal tubular epithelial cell cultures(Forgo et al., unpublished observations). Its expression inOK cells is the basis for the use of this cell line as an invitro model for the study of cellular mechanisms involvedin regulation of type IIa Na-Pi cotransport activity (seeRefs. 192–194, 234–236, 263, 307–311; for review, see Refs.283–288).

The related type IIb Na-Pi cotransporter is found inthe apical membrane of upper small intestinal enterocytesand type II pneumocytes (see Refs. 175, 396); type IIbtranscripts have been found in a variety of other tissues(175).

FIG. 5. Evolutionary tree of type II Na-Pi cotransporters identified indifferent species. The database accession numbers are as follows:mouse kidney, L33878 and U22465; rat kidney, L13257; human kidney,L13258; sheep, AJ001385; rabbit kidney, U20793; opossum kidney cells,L26308; mouse intestine, AF081499; human intestine, AF111856; bovinekidney cells, X81699; chicken kidney (A. Werner, unpublished data);carp kidney (Werner, unpublished data); zebrafish kidney (Werner, un-published data), flounder kidney and intestine, U13963; Xenopus intes-tine, L78836; zebrafish intestine (Werner, unpublished data); Vibrio

cholerae, AJ010968; Caenorhabditis elegans, AF095787. A type II Na-Pi

cotransporter was also identified from sheep kidney (S. P. Shirazi-Beechey, unpublished data; accession number AJ001385). [Dendrogramis extended from that published by Werner et al. (414) and given to uscourtesy of Andreas Werner.]

1382 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 11: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

3. Structural aspects

Hydropathy analysis predicted eight transmembranesegments for the type IIa cotransporter protein (Fig. 2;Ref. 260; for review, see Refs. 284, 285). This membranetopology was supported by several experimental findings:1) insertion of FLAG epitopes and accessibility of theepitope to antibodies (231); 2) lack of accessibility ofantibodies directed against COOH- and NH2-specificamino acid sequences (231); 3) identification of two gly-cosylation sites in the second “suggested” extracellularloop (166); and 4) accessibility to membrane-impermeantsulfhydryl reagents after insertion of cysteine residues atspecific sites of the protein (228, 229). Two regions maypenetrate partially into the lipid bilayer (Fig. 7).

Type IIa Na-Pi cotransporters contain numerous poten-tial phosphorylation sites for protein kinase C and casein IIkinases (165, 260). The role of these sites in physiologicalcontrol of transport activity is not clear (see sect. VC4).

On immunoblots of brush-border membrane proteinsperformed under nonreducing conditions, the type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter shows an apparent molecular mass of80–90 kDa; under reducing conditions two bands of;45–50 kDa appear (39, 48, 91, 425). The latter suggeststhat the transporter might be proteolytically cleaved be-tween the two glycosylation sites at positions N298 andN328 (39, 48, 228, 229, 305). It is not known whether thisproteolytic cleavage occurs in situ or whether it is exper-imentally induced. Site-directed mutagenesis studies doc-

umented an S-S bridge in the second extracellular loop(Fig. 7; Refs. 228, 229). It is of interest that separateoocyte injections of cRNA encoding NH2- and COOH-terminal fragments of the flounder type IIb Na-Pi cotrans-porter resulted in induction of Pi uptake activity only ifboth “parts” of the proteins were “present” (220).

The question of a multimeric structure of the type IIacotransporter has been addressed mainly in radiation in-activation studies (33, 98, 195). The size of the functionalunit of brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (mostlytype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter mediated) was found to bebetween 170 and 200 kDa, suggesting a multimeric struc-ture. Recent experiments in oocytes expressing wild-typeand mutant (inactivatable, cysteine insertion) type IIaNa-Pi cotransporters suggested that each individual wild-type cotransporter molecule within an assumed homo-multimeric complex is functional (220a). The apparenthigh functional molecular mass observed in brush-bordermembranes could also be due to a heteromultimeric com-plex (see below). The experiments in different heterolo-gous expression systems (e.g., in Sf9 cells, Refs. 134, 135;in MDCK cells and LLC-PK1 cells, Refs. 325, 326; and inoocytes, Ref. 260) suggest that an unknown additionalprotein within the functional complex is not an obligatoryrequirement for the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter-mediatedPi uptake activity or, rather unlikely, is present as anintrinsic protein (to serve as a transporter subunit) indifferent expression systems.

FIG. 6. Chromosomal location and genomic organization of human type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter. The gene is localizedon chromosome 5 (5q35) and has 12 introns and 13 exons. The position of the introns and their size is given with respectto the transcription initiation site. For further discussion, see text and included references. [Adapted from Hartmann etal. (162) and Kos et al. (222).]

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1383

Page 12: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

Tatsumi et al. (381) have identified type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter-related cDNA (named NaPi-2a, NaPi-2b,and NaPi-2g). The NaPi-2a-encoded protein (355 aminoacids) has a high homology to the NH2-terminal half of thetype IIa cotransporter, NaPi-2b encodes for 327 aminoacids identical to the NH2-terminal part of type IIa co-transporter with a completely different 146-amino acidCOOH-terminal end, and NaPi-2g encodes a 268-aminoacid protein from the COOH-terminal end of the molecule(381). It seems that the related mRNA are formed byalternative splicing of the type IIa cotransporter gene(381). Isoform specific mRNA were found on Northernblots of rat kidney cortex mRNA. With the use of a full-length type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter cDNA probe, the ma-jor transcript detected was ;2.6 kb (260, 381). Additional

bands (9.5, 4.6, and 1.2 kb) were seen, although in ourexperience, these bands are not abundant (260, 381). TheNaPi-2a probe hybridizes with transcripts of 9.5 and 4.6kb, the NaPi-2b probe with a transcript of 1.2 kb, and theNaPi-2g probe with transcripts of 9.5 and 2.6 kb (381). InWestern blots, with the use of NH2- or COOH-terminaltype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter specific antibodies, proteinsof 45, 40, and 37 kDa were observed, corresponding ap-proximatively to the size of the in vitro translated proteins(NaPi-2a, NaPi-2b, NaPi-2g; Ref. 381). The full-length typeIIa Na-Pi cotransporter protein is recognized in Westernblots from brush-border membrane as a 80- to 90-kDaprotein in its glycosylated form (87). In our hands, thelower molecular mass bands are not detected in the ab-sence of reducing agents (see Refs. 39, 91). Because they

FIG. 7. Secondary structure (membrane topology) of type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (rat, NaPi-2). The model is derivedfrom hydropathy predictions (Fig. 2; Ref. 260) and is experimentally supported by studies on N-glycosylation (166),accessibilities of specific antibodies to either the NH2 or COOH terminus (231), FLAG-epitope insertion (231), andcysteine insertions/deletions (228, 229). For further details, see text and included references.

1384 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 13: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

are only visible under reducing conditions, type 2a, 2b,and/or 2g related proteins might be linked to the full sizetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter via S-S bridges. Alternatively,the possibility exists that the smaller proteins, apparentafter reduction of S-S bridges, are a product of proteo-lytic cleavage of the full size type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter protein (see above). Based on coexpression ex-periments in oocytes, Tatsumi et al. (381) postulatedthat the smaller isoforms might regulate, in a dominantnegative manner, the function of the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter protein. However, this interpretation re-quires further studies to, for example, document thecoexistence, within a “heterologous” complex, of thedifferent proteins at the brush-border membrane. Fur-thermore, quantitative aspects are crucial, since in ourexperience NaPi-2a, -2b, and -2g can only be present inrather small amounts relative to the full size type IIacotransporter. Thus the role of the small type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter-related proteins in brush-border mem-brane Na-Pi cotransport in vivo is not clear.

An antisense type IIb Na-Pi cotransporter transcriptwas detected in different nonmammalian tissues. It waspostulated that it might be involved in the control ofcotransporter protein expression (physiological control;tissue specificity; Ref. 184).

When expressed in X. laevis oocytes, the type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter mediates Na-Pi cotransport activitywith functional characteristics identical to those ob-served in isolated brush-border vesicles (87, 163, 260, 366,405). A 3:1 stoichiometry (Na1:Pi) is the basis for itsmembrane potential sensitivity (electrogenicity; e.g., Refs.59, 123). As discussed in section V, the transport charac-teristics and kinetic behavior of the type IIa transporterhave been studied in great detail. Similar transport char-acteristics were also observed in different other heterol-ogous expression systems such as insect Sf9 cells, fibro-blasts, and MDCK cells (134, 135, 326, 395).

C. Type III Na-Pi Cotransporter

Surprisingly, the receptor for gibbon ape leukemiavirus (Glvr-1) and the receptor for the mouse ampho-tropic retrovirus (Ram-1) have been shown to mediateNa-Pi cotransport activity after their expression in X.

laevis oocytes (201, 202, 302). The transporter proteinshave been named PiT-1 and PiT-2 and are now classifiedas type III Na-Pi cotransporters (Table 1).

Expression of type III Na-Pi cotransporters seems tobe ubiquitous, and related mRNA have been identified inkidney, parathyroid glands, bone, liver, lung, striated mus-cle, heart, and brain (Table 1; Refs. 84, 201, 202, 302, 303,362, 382). In mouse kidney, transcripts of type III cotrans-porters are found throughout the different structures(362, 388). Immunofluorescence studies showed in the

proximal tubule a basolateral location (C. Silve, personalcommunication). Based on mRNA levels, type III Na-Pi

cotransporters are two orders of magnitude less abundantthan type IIa transporters (388). Its role in the proximaltubule seems not to be in transcellular Pi transport butrather in cell Pi uptake if luminal Pi entry is insufficient forcell metabolic functions. Type III transporter expressionseems not to be altered by PTH (386).

The type III transporters show some homology to aNeurospora crassa gene (Pho-41) involved in transmem-brane Pi movements (302). Hydropathy analysis suggests10 transmembrane regions (Fig. 2; Refs. 201, 202).

PiT-1- and PiT-2-mediated Na-Pi cotransport has beenstudied by expression in X. laevis oocytes or in fibroblasttransfection (201, 202, 302). Transport is characterized bya Km for Pi in the order of 20–30 mM and a Km for Na of40–50 mM. pH dependence of type III Na-Pi cotransporteris opposite to the type IIa cotransporter, i.e., decreasedactivity by increasing pH. Similar to the type IIa, typeIII-mediated transport of Pi is electrogenic with a netinflux of a positive charge during the transport cycle,suggesting also a 3:1 stoichiometry .

V. TYPE IIA SODIUM-PHOSPHATE

COTRANSPORTER: THE KEY PLAYER

IN BRUSH-BORDER MEMBRANE

PHOSPHATE FLUX

The tissue expression, the relative renal abundance,and overall transport characteristics of type I, II (IIa), andIII Na-Pi cotransporters suggest that the type IIa trans-porter plays a key role in brush-border membrane Pi flux.As discussed in this section, changes in expression of thetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter protein parallel alterations inproximal tubular Pi handling, documenting its physiolog-ical importance (for review, see Refs. 242, 284–289). Inaddition, experiments on molecular (genetic) suppressionof the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter support its role inmediating brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport. 1)Intravenous injection of specific antisense oligonucleo-tides led to reduced brush-border membrane Na-Pi co-transport activity that was associated with a decrease intype IIa cotransporter protein (300). 2) Disruption of thetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter gene (Npt 2) in mice led to an;70% reduction in brush-border Na-Pi cotransport rateand complete loss of the protein (25, 178; see also below).The molecular basis for the remaining brush-border mem-brane Na-Pi cotransport after Npt 2 gene disruption isunclear. Either the type I transporter protein or anothernot yet identified Na-Pi cotransporter could account forresidual transport activity. 3) Injection of type IIa anti-sense oligonucleotides in oocytes completely inhibitedNa-Pi cotransport mediated by kidney cortex mRNA, con-firming its major role in brush-border membrane Na-Pi

cotransport (275, 276, 389, 415).

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1385

Page 14: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

A. Transport Characteristics

As already indicated, the transport characteristics ofthe type IIa cotransporter heterologously expressed indifferent cellular systems (mainly X. laevis oocytes) re-sembles closely those of Na-Pi cotransport activity ob-served in isolated brush-border membranes (e.g., Refs. 87,88, 163, 168, 219, 260, 366, 405, 417). In particular, in allexpression systems studied thus far, type IIa-mediatedNa-Pi cotransport activity increased with increasing me-dia pH values, a “signature” for proximal tubular brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport (e.g., Refs. 14, 260).

The simplest experimental technique to analyze thetransport characteristics of a Na-substrate cotransporteris by studying Na1 gradient-driven tracer substrate influxunder different conditions. For the type IIa cotransporter,this has been done already in 1976 in isolated rat brush-border membrane vesicles (179); obviously, it was thennot known that the brush-border Na-Pi cotransport activ-ity is mostly associated with the type IIa cotransporterprotein (25, 260). The studies with isolated membranevesicles provided, however, significant insights into themechanism/kinetic of brush-border membrane Na-Pi co-transport (e.g., Refs. 14, 34, 35, 55, 80, 352). A detailedkinetic characterization of type IIa-mediated Na-Pi co-transport activity was performed after its expression in X.

laevis oocytes (e.g., Ref. 260). The first characterization,performed using tracer techniques, suggested a Na1:Pi

stoichiometry exceeding unity (see sect. VA1; Ref. 260).These data and the evidence for electrogenicity of Na-Pi

cotransport across the brush-border membrane from mi-croperfusion experiments in vivo (133) and from studieswith isolated vesicles (35, 55) were the rationale for anelectrophysiological characterization of the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter after its expression in oocytes. The electro-physiological studies, performed under steady-state con-ditions, complemented the tracer uptake study, whereaspre-steady-state measurements provided new insightsinto individual steps within the transport cycle (see be-low).

1. Steady-state electrophysiological characteristics

Under voltage-clamp conditions, superfusion of oo-cytes expressing the rat type IIa cotransporter with 1 mMPi in the presence of Na1 (100 mM) elicits an inwardcurrent, the magnitude of which depends on the holdingpotential (Fig. 8, A and B; Refs. 56, 58, 59, 122, 123, 125,126, 407, 408). This observation indicates that a Pi-in-duced inward movement of positive charge(s) occurs dur-ing the transport cycle. At a given membrane potential,dose-response relationships can then be obtained for bothNa1 and Pi. Furthermore, the interdependence of theapparent affinity for either Na1 or Pi and/or the appliedmembrane potential was studied (e.g., Ref. 122). For Pi, a

hyperbolic saturation curve is observed, whereas for Na1,the saturation curve is sigmoidal (Fig. 8, C and D). At 100mM Na1, the apparent Km for Pi interaction is ;0.1 mMand shows little dependency on the holding potential (Fig.8E). At 1 mM Pi, the apparent Km for Na1 interaction is;50 mM (Fig. 8F). The concentration dependence of Pi-induced current depends on the external Na1 concentra-tion with a dual effect: increasing Na1 leads to a decreasein the apparent Km for Pi and to an increase in theapparent Vmax (Fig. 8C). On the other hand, increasing Pi

also leads to an increase in affinity for Na1 (Fig. 8D). Atthe lower Na1 concentrations, the apparent Km for Pi

interaction shows a marked dependence on the holdingmembrane potential (Fig. 8E); this is not observed for theKm for Na1 interaction (Fig. 8F). Finally, these saturationexperiments provide some information with respect tothe stoichiometry (Pi :Na1). Hill coefficients calculated onthe basis of the Pi saturation curves were always close to1, whereas those calculated for Na1 saturation were al-ways close to 3 (e.g., Refs. 59, 122 123). A 3:1 stoichiom-etry explains the positive inward current (59, 122, 123).The stoichiometry (Na1:Pi) has been determined moredirectly by simultaneous measurements of substrate fluxand charge movement under voltage-clamp conditions inthe same oocytes (123). It was found that translocation ofa positive charge into the oocyte is associated with thetransfer of 1 Pi and 3 Na1. These experiments also pro-vided evidence for the preferential transport of divalent Pi

anions (123).The antiviral agent foscarnet (phosphonoformic acid,

PFA) is a known competitive inhibitor of brush-bordermembrane Na-Pi cotransport (e.g., Refs. 10, 205, 256, 375,404). In electrophysiological studies, PFA inhibited Pi-induced inward currents but did not elicit PFA-inducedcurrents (59, 122). Thus PFA interferes with Pi binding butis not a transported substrate. In addition, arsenate is acompetitive inhibitor of brush-border membrane and oo-cyte type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter-mediated Pi uptake(179). In contrast to PFA, arsenate induces inward cur-rents and is thus a transported substrate (e.g., Ref. 163).Recently, a “slippage current” associated with the transferof the partially loaded type IIa cotransporter was identi-fied (only with Na1, see below; Fig. 9; Ref. 122). Thiscurrent was blocked by PFA and showed a dose depen-dence suggesting interaction with only one Na1. The slip-page current accounts for ;10% of maximally inducedcurrent of the fully loaded carrier (122). Although thisslippage current is of little functional significance, it isimportant in our understanding of the transporter cycle(see sect. VA3).

2. Pre-steady-state electrophysiological characteristics

Pre-steady-state relaxation’s resulting from the applica-tion of voltage steps to the voltage-clamped cell have been

1386 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 15: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

first reported for the cloned Na1-glucose cotransporter(SGLT-1; Refs. 45, 75, 167) expressed in oocytes and subse-quently for many other Na1-solute cotransport systems (e.g.,Ref. 117). They permit an identification of partial reactionswithin the transport cycle. Such measurements were alsoperformed with the rat (types IIa and IIb) and flounderisoforms (type IIb) of the type II Na-Pi cotransporters ex-pressed in oocytes (122, 124, 125, 126). Figure 9 provides anexample from a study on the rat type IIa cotransporter (122).Application of a voltage step in the presence of 96 mM Na1,and in the presence or absence of saturating Pi, leads to

current transients that are primarily due to charging oocytemembrane capacitance (Fig. 9A). Recording at a higher gainresults in a slower relaxation to the steady state in theabsence of Pi (Fig. 9B). Subtraction of the curves obtained inthe presence/absence of Pi shows transporter cycle-depen-dent relaxation currents (Fig. 9C), whose magnitude couldbe directly related to the magnitude of Pi-induced steady-state currents in oocytes expressing different amounts ofcotransporters at their surface (122). Furthermore, the Pi-induced effects on the pre-steady-state relaxation shows thesame saturation characteristics (apparent Km) as that ob-

FIG. 8. Electrogenic behavior of type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (rat, NaPi-2). A: basic scheme for the two-electrodevoltage-clamp system as used in oocytes expressing the transporter. Vc, current potential; Im, membrane current. B: basicexperimental recording. When Pi is suppressed in the presence of Na1, an inward current is recorded; its amplitudedepends on the transmembrane holding potential (steady-state current recordings). Vh, holding potential. C: dose-response data obtained at 250 mV (holding potential) by altering Pi concentrations in the superfusate containing either96 mM Na1 (■) or 50 mM Na1 (h), resulting in Michaelis constant (Km) values for Pi interaction (see E). Ip, pipettecurrent. D: dose-response data obtained at 250 mV (holding potential) by altering Na1 concentration at either 1.0 mM Pi (■)or 0.1 mM Pi (h), resulting in Km values for Na1 interaction (see F). E: dependence of Km values for Pi interaction on differentholding potentials (see C). F: dependence of Km values for Na1 interaction on different holding potentials (see D).

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1387

Page 16: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

served for Pi interaction in steady-state measurements (122).These current transients are consistent with the transloca-tion of charged entities within the transmembrane electricfield. The voltage dependence of the time constants of re-laxation and equivalent charge associated with the relax-ation can be obtained from measurements after voltagejumps of different magnitudes from the same holding poten-tial. With the Boltzmann equation, the transporter number,turnover number, and the apparent valency for the chargemovement can be calculated, taking also into account Pi-induced steady-state currents obtained in the same oocytesas the pre-steady-state measurements. A value of 25 s21 wasestimated for the turnover of the rat type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter at 2100 mV, in agreement with that measured forother Na-solute transporters (e.g., Refs. 45, 75, 117, 167); theapparent valency of the charge translocated within the re-laxation cycle is 21 (122).

3. Kinetic scheme

Above steady-state measurements (electrophysiolog-ical and tracer studies) as well as electrophysiological

pre-steady-state measurements led to the formulation of akinetic scheme as shown in Figure 10 (122). The emptycarrier has a valency of 21 and can interact at the extra-cellular surface with one Na1. Translocation of the emptycarrier as well as interaction with one Na1 are voltage-dependent partial reactions within the transporter cycle.The carrier loaded with only 1 Na1 can translocate (“slip-page”); this is an electroneutral process. The Na1 inter-action then allows interaction with Pi (or with the inhib-itor PFA) at the extracellular surface. Finally, the fullyloaded carrier is formed by interaction with two addi-tional Na1. Translocation of the fully loaded carrier isagain an electroneutral process. We have no informationfor distinct steps occurring at the cytoplasmic surface butassume a transition from the fully loaded to the emptystate (mirror symmetry). A net inward movement of onepositive charge occurs per transport cycle, due to thereorientation of the charged (21) empty carrier. Althoughthe carrier might interact with mono- or divalent Pi, apreferential transport of divalent Pi prevails under mostphysiological and experimental conditions.

FIG. 9. Pre-steady-state charge movements related to type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (rat NaPi-2). A: voltage stepbetween 2100 to 0 mV applied to oocyte and corresponding membrane currents superimposed for 96 mM Na1 with andwithout 1 mM Pi. The small displacement in the baseline preceding the step represents the steady-state induced currentat 2100 mV. B: magnified view of current records in A showing a clear difference in the relaxations depending on thepresence or absence of substrate. Thin trace is for 1 mM Pi; bold trace is for 0 mM Pi. C: difference between records inB, showing the relaxations superimposed on the Pi-induced steady-state currents. Note that the rate of relaxation for theforward step (2100 to 0 mV) is faster than the return relaxation, indicating that the relaxation time constant dependson the target potential that is a characteristic of voltage-dependent charge movements. The area under each relaxation,determined by numerical integration, is a measure of the apparent charge translocated and should be equal for thedepolarizing and hyperpolarizing steps. For further discussion, see text and included references.

1388 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 17: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

4. pH dependence of transport

Proximal tubular brush-border membrane Na-Pi

cotransport is increased by increasing pH (e.g., Refs.14, 52, 55, 80, 327, 328, 334, 352). Studies with brush-border membrane vesicles provided evidence that thisphenomenon is to a significant extent explained by acompetition of protons with sodium for an interactionwith the carrier (14). Preferential transport of divalentPi also contributes to the observed pH dependence(352). Steady-state electrophysiological measurementsalso suggested a competitive interaction of H1 with theNa1-binding site(s) (59). Pre-steady-state measure-ments provided evidence for an additional direct effectof H1 on the carrier, on the reorientation of the emptytransporter (124). As indicated in Figure 10, the pHdependence of the carrier includes a kinetic effect onthe reorientation of the free carrier as well as compe-tition for Na1 binding. Thus the pH dependence of typeIIa Na-Pi cotransport activity is in part but cannot befully explained by preferential transport of divalent Pi.More recent studies indicated that this pH dependenceis determined by basic amino acid residues in the thirdextracellular loop (96).

B. Altered Expression as the Basis for Altered

Pi Reabsorption

With the cloning of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter(Npt 2), the key player in brush-border membrane Na-Pi

cotransport (see above and below), the tools were avail-able for a more detailed analysis of cellular/molecularmechanisms involved in physiological/pathophysiologicalalterations of proximal tubular Na-Pi cotransport.

The Npt 2 knockout mice (25, 178) documentedclearly the importance of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporterin renal Pi handling and in the overall maintenance of Pi

homeostasis. In Npt 2 knockout mice, other Na-Pi co-transporters (e.g., Npt 1, Glvr-1, and Ram-1) are notupregulated (178). Furthermore, renal handling of Pi is inNpt 2 knockout mice unaffected by PTH and Pi diet (178;N.-X. Zhao and H. S. Tenenhouse, personal communica-tion). In addition to the renal defects, Npt 2 knockoutmice have intrinsic skeletal abnormalities most likely re-lated to the lack of type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter in oste-oclasts (145a).

Alterations in proximal tubular Na-Pi cotransport ac-tivity after induction of altered renal Pi handling in theintact organism or in the OK cell tissue-culture model arealways associated with an altered apical membrane ex-pression of the type II Na-Pi cotransporter protein (fastingas an exception). In the following sections, we might firstdescribe situations of altered expression and discuss thencellular mechanisms leading to altered brush-border ex-pression.

1. Ontogeny/aging

Pi reabsorption in the kidney shows a strong ontoge-netic/developmental as well as age-dependent behavior

FIG. 10. Kinetic models for type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter. A: model derived from studies on rat renal brush-bordermembrane vesicles. [From Gmaj and Murer (138). This model was published in Physiological Reviews in 1986.] B: anordered kinetic model for type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter. This scheme shows the partial reactions that have been identifiedby the steady-state and pre-steady-state analyses (see Figs. 8 and 9). The shaded reactions represent the two voltage-dependent steps that contribute to the pre-steady-state charge movements. Substrate concentrations are assumed tomodify the binding rate constants only. Protons modulate the voltage-dependent rate constant associated with the emptycarrier as well as the final Na1-binding step, whereas phosphonoformic acid (PFA) most likely competes directly withPi binding. The binding/debinding steps on the cytosolic side have not yet been characterized. For further details, see textand included references (see also Refs. 122, 229).

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1389

Page 18: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

(e.g., Refs. 20, 66, 160, 161, 383). Age dependence was alsoobserved at the level of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporterprotein expression (365). In kidneys of newborn rats,expression of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter was ob-served in differentiated juxtamedullary and intermediatenephrons only and was absent in nephron “Anlagen” inthe outer cortex (S-shaped bodies; Ref. 397). After com-pletion of nephron formation, during suckling, expressionof the transporter was similarly high in the brush-bordermembrane of all nephron generations. In weaning, theexpression pattern resembled that in adults (238, 397),i.e., type IIa abundance decreased in the brush-bordermembrane of superficial and midcortical nephrons. Theimmunohistochemical data suggest that, as soon asnephrogenesis is completed, the type IIa transporter inthe kidney is functional. As indicated above, in weaningmice, a specific transcription factor (TFE3) might contrib-ute to the expression of the Npt 2 gene, especially in lowPi conditions (212a).

A specific type IIa-related Na-Pi cotransporter proteinwas postulated to account for high Pi transport rates inweaning rats (363, 364). Evidence for this postulate wasobtained by antisense experiments and transport expres-sion in X. laevis oocytes. When mRNA isolated fromkidney cortex of rapidly growing rats was treated withtype IIa transporter antisense oligonucleotides, or de-pleted of type IIa specific mRNA by a subtractive hybrid-ization procedure, Na1-dependent Pi uptake was still de-tected in injected oocytes. The type IIa transporter-depleted mRNA contained a mRNA species that has somesequence homology to the type IIa transporter encodingmessage. This interesting observation was not followedup, and at present, the identity of this growth-relatedtransporter is not clear and/or remains hypothetical.

Tubular Pi reabsorption decreases during aging ashas been indicated by metabolic balance studies, clear-ance studies, and studies with isolated vesicles (66, 160,161, 214). This decrease is due to a reduction in the Vmax

without a change in the apparent Km for Pi of brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport. The type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter brush-border membrane protein mRNAabundance decreased approximatively twofold when3-mo-old rats are compared with 12- to 16-mo-old rats, inparallel to the decrease in brush-border membrane Na-Pi

cotransport activity (365).

2. Regulatory control

As already indicated, physiological (and pathophysi-ological) alterations in renal handling of Pi are related toan altered brush-border content of the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter protein.This was observed for altered brush-border mem-

brane Na-Pi cotransport activity as observed in responseto altered dietary Pi intake (e.g., Refs. 48, 53, 61, 76, 78,

204, 243, 245, 246, 348, 370–372, 387, 405, 415, 434; forreview, see Ref. 283). An increase in brush-border mem-brane Na-Pi cotransporter activity in response to a low-Pi

diet correlated with an increase in type IIa transporterprotein in Western blots and in immunohistochemistry(e.g., Refs. 48, 243, 258). The histochemical analysis sug-gests a “recruitment” phenomenon (Fig. 11; Ref. 348). Inanimals fed a high (or normal)-Pi diet, expression oftransporter is mostly in deep (juxtamedullary) nephrons,and in animals fed a low-Pi diet, the transporter is alsohighly expressed in superficial nephrons. The diet-in-duced changes are observed at the functional and proteinlevels within the first 2 h, but feeding a low-Pi diet forprolonged time periods also leads to a change in type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter mRNA that is not observed after shorttime periods. Refeeding high-Pi diets to animals adaptedchronically to low-Pi diet results in a reversal of thisphenomenon, first a decrease in brush-border expressionof the transporter protein without a decrease in specificmRNA content (243; see also Refs. 27, 199, 376, 387, 415).The type I Na-Pi cotransporter does not show such alter-ations (e.g., Refs. 48, 405). Similar findings could also beobtained in OK cells, i.e., an increase in type IIa proteincontent in response to a low-Pi media occurred withinhours, in parallel with an increase in Na-Pi cotransportactivity (e.g., Refs. 266, 309). The findings on the responseof OK cell-specific type IIa transporter mRNA to low-Pi

diet are controversial (266, 309, 353, 354). In our labora-tory, the low-Pi diet-induced changes in specific mRNAcontent were rather small, and transport adaptation wasnot prevented by actinomycin D (41, 266, 309). Further-more, the adaptive phenomena were also observed in OKcells with the transfected rat type IIa cotransporter on theprotein but not mRNA level (309).

An altered PTH status in the animal is associatedwith an altered brush-border expression of the type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter as analyzed by Western blots of iso-lated brush-border membrane vesicles or by immunohis-tochemical staining on kidney sections (210). Injection ofPTH in rats or mice leads within minutes to a reduction inbrush-border membrane transporter content without aconcomitant loss of other brush-border proteins, e.g., theNa-sulfate cotransporter protein (Fig. 12; Refs. 210, 257,259; see also Ref. 265). A prolonged increase in PTH canalso lead to a decrease in type II Na-Pi cotransportermRNA content (210). Also in OK cells, PTH leads to adecrease in the apical expression of the intrinsic andtransfected rat type IIa Na-Pi cotransporters (235, 308–311).

A role for insulin has been postulated for the adaptiveresponse of the proximal tubule to changes in dietary Pi

intake (247). In vitro and in vivo experiments providedevidence that insulin stimulates brush-border membraneNa-Pi cotransport. Streptozotocin-induced diabetes is as-sociated with a reduced proximal tubular Pi reabsorption,

1390 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 19: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

a decreased type I Na-Pi cotransporter content, and nochange in either type IIa or III Na-Pi cotransporter content(247). It is, however, questionable whether phosphaturiain diabetes can be explained by a reduced type I Na-Pi

cotransporter expression. Phosphaturia could rather beexplained by an inhibition of type IIa Na-Pi cotransportactivity related to a competition for driving forces (in-crease in glucose reabsorption; see Refs. 22, 392). Instreptozotocin-induced diabetes, the adaptive response(dietary intake) of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter wasprevented (1, 7, 358).

Thyroid hormone (3,39,5-triiodothyronine; T3) in-creases proximal tubular brush-border membrane andOK cell apical Na-Pi cotransport (e.g., Refs. 31, 107, 118,213, 433); a parallel increase in PFA binding sites sug-

gested an increased brush-border membrane content oftransporters (433, 434). Euzet et al. (119) have shownan important role for T3 in the maturation of the typeIIa Na-Pi cotransporter (119). It was shown that phys-iological doses of T3 lead in rats to an increase inbrush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport activity,type IIa transporter protein content, and specific mRNAcontent (6). The stimulatory effect of T3 is less evidentin aging animals (6). Nuclear run-on experiments pro-vided evidence that these effects are due to an in-creased transcription of the transporter gene (6). In OKcells, the stimulatory effect of T3 was completely pre-vented by the transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D(367).

IGF-I directly stimulated OK cell Na-Pi cotransport

FIG. 11. Effect of dietary Pi intake on type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (rat, NaPi-2) mRNA (A–C) and protein (D–I). Left:animals fed chronically a high-Pi diet (1.2% Pi) and switched for different time periods to low-Pi diets (0.1% Pi). Right:animals fed chronically a low-Pi diet (0.1% Pi) and switched for different time periods to high-Pi diets. Magnifications:A–F, 345; G–I, 31,200. Bars: A–F, 200 mm; G–I, 5 mm. For further details, see text and included references. [Adaptedfrom Ritthaler et al. (348).]

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1391

Page 20: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

associated with an increase in specific type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter content, an effect most likely involving ac-tivation of tyrosine kinase activity (193).

EGF caused a time- and dose-dependent decrease inOK cell Na-Pi cotransport rate, an effect associated with adecrease in type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter mRNA abun-dance (15). This observation is in agreement with findingson weaned and suckling rats but in disagreement withobservations on isolated perfused rabbit proximal tubuleswhere EGF stimulates Na-Pi cotransport (17, 336).

Glucocorticoid administration to rats and neonatalrabbits decreased rat brush-border membrane Na-Pi co-transport activity and kidney cortex type IIa transportercontent (16, 244, 254, 320). Also in OK cells glucocorti-coids led to a reduction in Na-Pi cotransport activity andassociated transporter protein content (192; see also Ref.156a).

Fasting-induced phosphaturia leads to decreased ex-pression of type I Na-Pi cotransporter mRNA but to nochange in type IIa mRNA content (247). However, it is

unlikely that a decreased type I Na-Pi cotransporter con-tent accounts for the phosphaturia observed in fastingconditions (28). As indicated above, the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter determines overall renal Pi handling.Acid-base changes also induce alterations in the ex-

pression of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter. Chronic met-abolic acidosis in rats significantly decreased brush-bor-der membrane Na-Pi cotransport activity, associated witha decrease in type IIa cotransporter protein and mRNAcontent (11). At the onset of acute (6 h) metabolic acido-sis, changes in transport activity and brush-border trans-porter protein content were not paralleled by a change incortical tissue type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter mRNA or pro-tein (11). This may indicate that in acute situationschanges in membrane trafficking of the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter (see below) contribute to the acid-inducedchanges. Interestingly, in OK cells, we have found anopposite effect of exposure to an acid medium (192, 194).Transport activity, transporter protein, and mRNA con-tent were all increased; the increase was, however, pre-

FIG. 12. Parathyroid hormone(PTH)-dependent retrieval of type IIaNa-Pi cotransporters from the brush-border membrane. Rats with removedparathyroid glands (PTX) were in-jected with PTH, and kidney sliceswere then stained for the type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter (NaPi-2) or forthe Na-SO4 cotransporter (NaSi-1;Ref. 265). It was seen that the type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter is removed fromthe brush-border membrane in re-sponse to PTH administration. Atearly time periods (35 min), a subapi-cal appearance of the transporter isvisible. The Na-SO4 cotransporter isnot removed from the brush-bordermembrane in response to PTH admin-istration. For further reading, see textand included references.

1392 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 21: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

vented or reversed by adding glucocorticoids (192). Thisindicates that the above observations in rat might be theresult of acid base-induced changes in glucocorticoid lev-els rather than of direct cellular effects (see also Refs. 47,127).

3. Acquired alterations

Proximal tubular brush-border membrane Na-Pi co-transport is sensitive to intoxication by heavy metals (5,141, 255, 321). A direct acute inhibitory effect of Hg21,Pb21, and Cd21 has been shown in X. laevis oocytesexpressing the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (408). Hg21

and Cd21 effects were mostly on Vmax effects, but Pb21

also increased the apparent Km for Pi (408). It will be ofinterest to determine whether the described inhibitoryeffect can be assigned to specific sulfhydryl groups, whichwould then also explain the observations in brush-bordermembranes (Refs. 255, 321; e.g., also in studies with cis-platin, Ref. 90). In vivo intoxication of rats with cadmiumreduced brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport rateaccompanied by a loss of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporterprotein (169).

4. Genetic abnormalities

Among the different genetically determined alter-ations in renal Pi handling, only X-linked defects havebeen characterized at the level of brush-border membranePi transporters. Studies on the murine Hyp and Gy ho-mologs of the human disease X-linked hypophosphatemiahave identified a specific reduction in brush-border mem-brane Na-Pi cotransport activity that was associated witha reduction in type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter protein andspecific mRNA content, thereby accounting for the Pi leakin affected mice (27, 384, 385, 387, 389, 393; see also Refs.87–89). Because the Npt 2 gene does not map to theX-chromosome (see above and Refs. 222, 223, 437), adefect in a gene on the X-chromosome must influence therenal brush-border expression of the type IIa Na-Pi co-transporter (for review, see Ref. 384). This mutant genehas been identified in affected humans (106, 110, 112, 185)by linkage/positional cloning and subsequently in Hyp

and Gy mice (26, 373); it was designated PHEX/Phex

(formerly PEX/Pex) to signify phosphate regulating genewith homology to endopeptidases on the X-chromosome.The PHEX/Phex protein is not expressed in the kidney butrather in bones (26). On the basis of its homology to amembrane-bound endopeptidases, it is postulated thatPHEX/Phex is involved in the processing of humoral fac-tor(s) (e.g., phosphatonin and stanniocalcin 1/2; see alsoRefs. 72, 105, 111, 189, 224, 225, 272) which regulate renalPi handling by altering the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporterexpression, and Pi metabolism in general (for review, seeRefs. 110, 112, 295, 384). In Hyp mice, a decreased tran-scription rate of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter gene was

observed (89). In Hyp and Gy mice, different gene dele-tions were identified: a 39-deletion in Hyp and a 59-dele-tion in Gy (26, 273).

C. Cellular Mechanisms in the Control of Type II

Na-Pi Cotransporter Expression

As discussed in section VB, changes in renal Pi han-dling are attributable, for the most part, to altered brush-border membrane expression of the type IIa Na-Pi co-transporter. It is apparent that alterations in the type IIaNa-Pi cotransporter expression occur independently oftranscriptionally regulated changes in mRNA, perhapswith the exception of T3 (6, 367), 1,25(OH)2D3-mediatedeffects (8, 380), or prolonged feeding of low-Pi diets inweaning mice (212a). If changes in type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter mRNA are observed, they are either rather small orthey occur only after prolonged stimulation (e.g., Refs.210, 243), i.e., after changes in the specific transporterprotein content, suggesting that changes in mRNA repre-sent a phenomenon secondary to the primary event, i.e.,downregulation or upregulation of brush-border expres-sion of type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter protein. In agreementwith this apparent lack of transcriptional control mecha-nisms are the negative observations with promoter/re-porter gene studies in OK cells (e.g., Refs. 174, 176),where with the above-mentioned exceptions of alter-ations in 1,25(OH)2D3 (380), of the low-Pi diet-dependentincrease in TFE3 in weaning mice (212a), or in ambientbicarbonate/carbon dioxide tension (194) of the media, noactivation of the NPT 2/Npt 2 promoter could be detected.Therefore, it is appropriate to restrict the discussion pri-marily to mechanisms leading to altered membrane ex-pression, i.e., mainly to membrane retrieval and mem-brane insertion of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (forreview, see Refs. 286, 288). The crucial role of “membranetrafficking” in the control of brush-border membrane ex-pression of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter offers thepotential for physiological/pathophysiological control ofNa-Pi cotransport involving alterations in the participatingcomplex machinery. In this way, for example, an endoso-mal chloride channel defect in Dent’s disease may affectmembrane insertion and thus lead to phosphaturia (252,253, 391).

1. Membrane retrieval

The phenomenon of membrane retrieval of the trans-porter can be best studied in PTH-induced or high-Pi

diet-induced downregulation of brush-border membraneNa-Pi cotransport activity and type IIa Na-Pi cotransporterprotein abundance (see Figs. 11 and 12 and Refs. 208, 210,257, 259; see also Refs. 180, 209, 211, 306). The data fromimmunohistochemical (immunogold) studies on PTH-in-duced internalization are summarized in Figure 13 (398).

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1393

Page 22: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

In rats, infusion of PTH or feeding high-Pi diets leads to atransient accumulation of type IIa Na-Pi cotransporters inthe so-called subapical vacuolar apparatus (83, 164). In-ternalization can occur at intermicrovillar clefts via clath-rin and adapter protein (AP-2) containing membrane car-gos (398). The same endocytic structures can be filled byhorseradish peroxidase injected into the animals beforePTH treatment (398). Thus type IIa Na-Pi cotransportersare internalized via the same pathway as soluble proteins.Evidence from experiments with cholchicine-pretreatedrats indicates that there might be an additional “un-known” internalization step, separate from the intermi-crovillar clefts (259; Fig. 13). Morphological and biochem-ical data suggest that internalized type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporters are directed to the lysosomes for degrada-tion (212, 311, 398). Although recycling of transportersback to the membrane cannot be entirely excluded, underthe experimental conditions applied, no evidence for sucha reutilization of internalized transporters could be ob-tained in studies on OK cells (262, 311). Surface biotiny-lation experiments performed in OK cells provided directevidence that the increase in intracellularly located trans-porters after PTH treatment is related to a decrease of

transporters at the cell surface (191). An alternate mech-anism that would lead to reduced transporter expressionat the surface would have been degradation at the mem-brane site and/or a reduced insertion rate (see sect. VC2)to account for intracellular accumulation. Obviously, thisphenomena of downregulation requires a complex ma-chinery that provides specificity for the transporter mol-ecule and specific signaling events. These issues are dis-cussed in the following sections.

2. Membrane insertion

This phenomenon can be best analyzed in ratsadapted to high-Pi diet and fed “acutely” a low-Pi diet (e.g.,Fig. 11; e.g., Refs. 243, 258). The increase in brush-bordertype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter content is observed within1–2 h and can also be observed in OK cells after exposureto media with adjusted Pi contents (309). This rapid in-crease occurs independently of any change in specifictype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter mRNA content (243, 309). InOK cells, this adaptive response could be prevented byblocking protein synthesis at the translational level (e.g.,Ref. 41). In contrast, in animal models, pretreatment with

FIG. 13. “Mechanisms” of type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter internalization. A and B: double labeling of Na/Pi-2 (rattransporter) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP; fluid-phase marker) by the immunogold labeling technique on ultrathincryosection of rat kidneys after HRP and parathyroid hormone (PTH) injection. Gold particles (12 nm) bound to NaPi-2are located at the microvillar membrane (MV) and at intermicrovillar clefts (arrows). NaPi-2 and HRP (gold particles 6nm) are colocalized in the clefts (arrows) and in subapical vesicles of the vacuolar apparatus (A and B). Magnifications:A, 3;23,000; B, 3;33,000. Bars: ;1 mm. C: proposed pathway of trafficking of NaPi-2 cotransporter in proximal tubulecells. Newly synthezised NaPi-2 seems to travel to the brush-border membrane via the subacpical compartment (SAC;corresponding to the vacuolar apparatus). During downregulation of the protein in the brush-border membrane,internalized NaPi-2 seems to follow the same general endocytotic pathway like HRP via small endocytotic vesicles (SEV),subapical compartment (SAC), and large endosomal vesicles (LEV); finally, the proteins will be degraded in lysosomes(Ly). This pathway includes also the participation of clathrin and adaptor protein 2 (AP-2). For further details, see textand included references. The Na/Pi cotransporter may also be internalized via a non-clathrin-mediated pathway (dashedline; see text). [Adapted from Traebert et al. (398).]

1394 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 23: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

cycloheximide did not prevent upregulation of brush-bor-der membrane type IIa Na-Pi cotransport activity andprotein (242, 245, 246, 258). However, it has not beenshown whether protein synthesis is indeed blocked inproximal tubular cells after intraperitoneal injection ofcycloheximide. Upregulation of Na-Pi cotransporter activ-ity and type IIa transporter protein content is obviouslyalso observed after recovery from PTH inhibition. In OKcells it was found that the recovery of Na-Pi cotransportactivity and type II Na-Pi transporter protein is entirelydependent on protein synthesis (262, 311). In chronicparathyroidectomized rats, a specific upregulation of typeIIa Na-Pi cotransporter protein was also observed in theabsence of changes in specific mRNA content (210).

3. Involvement of microtubules

In contrast to the known dependence of the endocy-tosis of soluble proteins on an intact microtubular net-work (115), the internalization of type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porters in response to either PTH or acute high-Pi dietfeeding was not impaired (258, 259) by agents disturbingmicrotubules. Similar observations were made in OK cells(158). In contrast, the intracellular routing of the trans-porter to the lysosomes depends on an intact microtubu-lar network (258, 259). Membrane insertion of the trans-porter, observed after acute administration of a low-Pi

diet, requires an intact microtubular network (258), inagreement with the important role of microtubules forapical routing of post-Golgi vesicles and for the mainte-nance of the dense tubular subapical network (115, 270).It is of interest that PTH and altered medium Pi contentwere found to have profound effects on the cytoskeletonof cultured proximal tubular cells (139, 258, 259, 304).

4. Signaling pathways

A) CAMP AND DIACYLGLYCEROL/INOSITOL TRISPHOSPHATE (CAL-CIUM). cAMP- and diacylglycerol (DAG)/inositol trisphos-phate (IP3)-related signaling pathways in the regulation ofbrush-border membrane type II Na-Pi cotransporter activ-ity and expression have been studied in relation to PTH-dependent regulation of proximal tubular Pi reabsorption.PTH and PTH-related peptide receptors, respectively, arelocated in both apical and basolateral membranes of prox-imal tubular epithelial cells and of OK cells (e.g., Refs.68–70, 73, 85, 86, 186, 200, 215, 261–264, 331–333, 341, 342,346; for review, see Refs. 280, 283). The PTH receptor cansignal through activation of both adenylate cyclase andphospholipase C, generating the second messengerscAMP, IP3, a rise in intracellular Ca21, and DAG (e.g.,Refs. 2, 183, 271). The PTH-(1O34) analog activates bothsignaling pathways, whereas the PTH-(3O34) analog onlyactivates the cAMP-independent signaling pathway (e.g.,Refs. 85, 86, 235, 308). Although pharmacological activa-tion of either pathway separately leads to an inhibition of

apical Na-Pi cotransport activity associated with a de-crease in brush-border membrane type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter protein content (e.g., Refs. 235, 264, 308), thereseems to be an interdependence of the two regulatorypathways. In OK cells, abolition of the cAMP/protein ki-nase A pathway prevents PTH inhibition (267, 268, 357);similarly, inhibition of the DAG/protein kinase C pathwayalso reduces PTH inhibition of the Na-Pi cotransporter(330, 333). Furthermore, in OK cells, the maximal inhibi-tion induced by PTH-(3O34) is only ;50% of the maximalPTH-(1O34)-induced inhibition (85, 86, 235, 308).

Although most observations on PTH-dependent sig-naling mechanisms were derived from studies with OKcells, similar mechanisms may be operative in the proxi-mal tubule; PTH-(3O34) similar to PTH-(1O34) leads to areduction in apical type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter content inintact rats and in vitro perfused mice proximal tubules(399). Furthermore, the experiments with the isolatedperfused tubules showed that PTH-(1O34) leads to areduction in brush-border transporter content after per-fusion either through the lumen or basolateral side,whereas PTH-(3O34) only induces this reduction afterapical perfusion only (399). It is of interest that earlierstudies on OK cells have also provided evidence for asym-metrical signaling mechanisms in PTH control of apicalNa-Pi cotransport (341, 342). The experiments with iso-lated perfused tubules also documented the involvementof protein kinases A and C in internalization of the apicalNa-Pi cotransporter (399).

The events after second messenger generation lead-ing to inhibition and/or retrieval of the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter are not clear. Obviously, phosphorylationevents do play a role, but there is no direct evidence thataltered phosphorylation of the type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter protein is essential in the regulation (42, 152, 182).Recently, in studies in OK cells, it has been shown that thetype IIa transporter is a phosphoprotein. However, PTH-induced alterations in the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporterphosphorylation are difficult to document (M. Jankowski,H. Hiefiker, J. Biber, and H. Murer, unpublished observa-tions). Because there are several potential phosphoryla-tion sites within the protein sequence, changes at individ-ual sites need to be analyzed. It is of interest that in X.

laevis oocytes, activation of protein kinase C leads to aninternalization of the transporter and to an associatedinhibition of transport (125). This inhibition/internaliza-tion is not prevented after mutagenesis of known kinaseconsensus sites, indicating that at least in this experimen-tal model, the phosphorylation consensus sites are notinvolved in this regulation (165). Finally, it is reasonableto assume that PTH-induced regulatory phosphorylationevents are not at the level of the transporter but rather atinteracting proteins required for its regulation (see sect.VC4D). In this respect it is of interest that regulation byPTH and/or pharmacological activation of protein kinases

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1395

Page 24: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

A/C requires the correct cellular context; transfectionexperiments showed that only the OK cells provide thecorrect cellular environment for this regulation of thetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (Z. Karim-Jiminez, N. Her-nando, H. Murer, and J. Biber, unpublished data). Suchdependence on an interacting protein has also beenshown for brush-border membrane Na/H exchange(NHE-3) and its kinase A-induced inhibition (412, 413,428; see also Ref. 293).

Extracellular cAMP (intratubular) is known to inhibitproximal tubular and OK cell apical Na-Pi cotransport.This effect can be related to specific receptor interactionsand intracellular signaling or more likely to luminal hy-drolysis of cAMP followed by uptake of adenosine, whichmight after incorporation into ATP be the source foradditional intracellular cAMP (130, 131, 132; see also Refs.274, 361). A role of intratubular cAMP, generated in theliver after stimulation by glucagon, has been suggested forin vivo control of Pi reabsorption (3). It is unclear at thismoment how these observations and interpretations canbe reconciled with the stimulatory effect of adenosine ontubular Pi reabsorption in rats (312).

Alterations in cytoplasmic calcium concentrationsper se are not sufficient/important in PTH-induced signal-ing of OK cell apical Na-Pi cotransport; this has beendocumented using Ca21-clamping protocols (332). Saxenaand Allon (353) have postulated that an increase insteady-state cytosolic calcium plays a role in “chronic”adaptation of OK cell Na-Pi cotransport to low-Pi media.

B) PI ADAPTATION (PI SENSING). As discussed above,brush-border membrane type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter pro-tein content, and thus proximal tubular Pi reabsorption,responds within hours to alterations in dietary Pi intake(242, 243, 258). This phenomenon is also observed in OKcells, induced by alteration in media Pi content (41, 309).In the animal models the adaptive phenomena might be inpart related to alterations in different humoral factors andlocal auto/paracrine factors, although PTH can be ex-cluded as a major factor (see above; for review, see Ref.37). In this regard, it is interesting that intravenous injec-tions of Pi are sufficient to induce alterations in brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport rate in thyroparathy-roidectomized rats (76; for review, see Refs. 37, 46, 283).Because alterations in dietary Pi intake are paralleled byrapid changes in plasma Pi concentration and thus offiltered Pi load (61, 316), the question of direct Pi sensingby the cells has to be considered, as indicated by theexperiments on OK cells. Experiments with OK cells pro-vided an interesting clue on the potential mechanisms inPi sensing by the proximal tubular cell. In cells grown onpermeant filters, depletion of Pi at the apical site wassufficient to provoke an adaptive increase of apical Na-Pi

cotransport rate, whereas removal of Pi only from thebasolateral cell surface was without effect (339, 340).Thus there is the possibility of a Pi sensing mechanism at

the apical surface. Because the Ca21 sensor (Ca21 recep-tor CaR) is expressed at the apical cell surface of proxi-mal tubular cells, it may “indirectly” be involved in tubularPi sensing, because changes in Pi and Ca21 concentra-tions are interdependent (51, 347). Another possibility isthat the rate of Pi entry at the apical cell surface contrib-utes to Pi sensing. It was observed that inhibition of OKcell Na-Pi cotransport after prolonged exposure to PFAresults after PFA removal in an “adapted” state of Na-dependent Pi uptake (J. Forgo and H. Murer, unpublishedobservations). Similarly, reduced Pi entry in response toPTH inhibition could provide a signal for the preferredresynthesis of the type IIa cotransporter resulting in re-covery of Na-Pi cotransport rates after removal of PTH. Inthis case, the higher transport rates after recovery wouldthen serve as feedback to again slow down the rate oftransporter resynthesis. Finally, the adaptive response ofNa-Pi cotransport rate to low Pi intake (or low-Pi media)may also involve a more general signaling that is relatedto changes in intracellular Pi metabolism after lowering ofapical (and/or basolateral) Pi (20, 102; see also Ref. 38). Inaddition, alterations in cytosolic Ca21 concentrationswere postulated to be part of the Pi-sensing mechanisms(353).

C) UBIQUITINYLATION. Membrane retrieval is involved inregulation of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter. Membraneretrieval of a variety of membrane proteins, includingmembrane receptors and perhaps also transporter pro-teins, e.g., the epithelial Na1 channel, can depend onubiquitinylation, which can be a signal for endocytosisfollowed by lysosomal and/or proteosomal degradation(368, 369; see also Ref. 173). In OK cells, lysosomal deg-radation, but not proteosomal degradation of the type IINa-Pi cotransporter protein, is involved in its PTH-depen-dent downregulation (311). Proteosomal (and lysosomal)degradation seems also to be involved in the basic turn-over of the OK cell type IIa cotransporter (311). Ubiquiti-nylation of the transporter itself or of interacting proteinscan be involved in membrane retrieval and/or targetingthe type IIa transporter to the degradation machinery.

D) INTRACRINE REGULATION. An intracrine regulationpathway was postulated to control apical expression oftype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (107; see also Refs. 29, 30,207, 427). Different metabolic and/or hormonal stimulimay lead to the synthesis of cyclic ADP-ribose, which inturn may initiate an intracellular regulatory cascade, withthe release of Ca21, activation of a Ca21/calmodulin-de-pendent protein kinase, and changes in the turnover ofthe transporter at the apical membrane (107).

E) PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITIDE 3-KINASE. Phosphatidylinosit-ide 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) seems to be involved in variousmembrane trafficking processes. In OK cells, inhibition ofPI 3-kinase leads to a reduction of endocytosis of albumin(54). However, endocytosis of type IIa Na-Pi cotrans-porter in OK cells and its degradation by PTH are not

1396 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 25: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

prevented by inhibition of PI 3-kinase (307). On the otherhand, inhibition of PI 3-kinase retards the recovery fromPTH inhibition and reduces transport activity and trans-porter protein content in control cells (307). Thus PTH-induced endocytosis of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransportoccurs via a different pathway than albumin endocytosis.PI 3-kinase activity may be involved in the resynthesis/reinsertion of apically located transporters.

F) TYROSINE KINASE ACTIVITY. In OK cells, vanadate, apotent inhibitor of protein tyrosine phosphatases, mim-icks the stimulatory effect of IGF-I on Na-Pi cotransportactivity (63, 65). Similarly, IGF-I and vanadate increasethe membrane abundance of type IIa Na-Pi cotransporterprotein content (193). The effects on transporter proteincontent could not be prevented by actinomycin D andcycloheximide (193). The latter observation led to theconclusion that tyrosine kinase-dependent mechanismsmay control the membrane stability (i.e., reduce the re-trieval rate) of the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter (193).Tyrosine kinase activity may also be involved in TGF-aand EGF effects on apical Na-Pi cotransport activity (15,314). However, the participation of phospholipase C/pro-tein kinase C has also been proposed for the TGF-a-and/or EGF-mediated effects (335–337).

5. Endocytic motifs

Tyrosine based and dileucine signals within the typeIIa Na-Pi cotransporter sequence might be important mo-tifs for the endocytic removal and/or membrane targeting,in a manner similar to some “model” proteins in polarizedepithelial cells (270). In mutagenesis experiments on thetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter, various tyrosine-based mo-tifs and dileucine motifs located at predicted intracellularsites were found not to be essential for internalization inoocytes and transfected OK cells (170–172). Because thetype IIb transporter (intestinal isoform) transfected in OKcells is also apically targeted but not internalized by PTH(171, 197, 198), endocytic motifs/domains can be identi-fied on studies of type IIa/IIb chimeras; these studiessuggested a critical role of a dibasic motif located in thelast intracellular loop (198; see Fig. 7).

6. Lipids

Alterations in brush-border membrane lipid compo-sition have been associated with altered brush-bordermembrane Na-Pi cotransport (e.g., Refs. 240, 241, 246, 279,406). Changes in membrane fluidity and a role of a sphin-gomyelin-ceramide regulatory pathways were postulated(157, 221, 237, 251, 435). Chronic adaptation to low-Pi dietwas reported to alter cholesterol and glycosphingolipidcontent and thus membrane fluidity (240, 241). However,alterations in Na-Pi cotransport induced by acute changesin low-Pi diets occur before the changes in brush-borderlipid composition and thus are not essential for the adap-

tive response (245, 246). In rat studies, evidence wasprovided that the dexamethasone-induced inhibition ofbrush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport is associatedwith a decrease in transporter protein content and anincrease in glucosylceramide (244). Taken together, itseems unlikely that transport alterations are directly re-lated to changes in membrane fluidity, but alterations inlipid composition, e.g., in microdomains such as glycolip-id-cholesterol rafts, may facilitate internalization of thetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter.

Recently, it was shown that different inhibitors ofP-glycoprotein functions stimulate proximal tubular Pi

reabsorption related to an increased expression of typeIIa Na-Pi cotransporter protein. It is speculated that thiseffect is associated with drug-induced changes in thesphyngomyeline-ceramide pathway and associatedchanges in the membrane traffic of the transporter protein(D. Prie, S. Couette, I. Fernandes, C. Sieve, and G. Fried-lander, personal communication).

7. Reduction of S-S bridge

In Western blots of isolated brush-border mem-branes, a significant proportion of the type IIa cotrans-porter appears to be cleaved under reducing conditions,suggesting that the transporter is stabilized by a S-Sbridge (e.g., Refs. 39, 48, 91, 229, 305, 425). The degree oftransport inhibition under reducing conditions correlatedwith the appearance of cleaved moieties (425). Internal-ization and cleavage of the transporter can also be in-duced in X. laevis oocytes by a treatment with reducingagents (230). On the basis of these findings, we suggestthat a reduction of S-S bridge within the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter may contribute to its basal turnover andperhaps regulation. Reduction of the S-S bridge within thesecond extracellular loop (Fig. 7) may destabilize thesecondary structure of the type IIa transporter proteinfollowed by a degradation at the cell surface or afterinternalization. Reducing agents might enter the proximaltubular lumen by the secretory mechanism for organicanions.

8. Interacting proteins

Type IIa Na-Pi cotransporters are located amongmany other membrane proteins along the microvilli. How-ever, in physiological regulation they are specifically in-ternalized at intermicrovillar clefts (210, 257, 259, 398).Conceptionally there should be “anchoring” mechanismskeeping proteins within the microvilli “en place.” In reg-ulation, the interaction between specific anchor (interact-ing) proteins and specific membrane proteins (e.g., thetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter) could be controlled, permit-ting via lateral mobility the protein to enter into cleftswhere it is removed. Alternatively, unrestricted lateralmobility could allow the transporter protein to enter al-

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1397

Page 26: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

ways into the cleft region and transporters to be removedwould then be posttranscriptionally modified (e.g., phos-phorylation, ubiquitinylation; see above) providing a sig-nal for membrane retrieval of the transporters to bedownregulated. Also, this latter mechanism would requirespecific proteins to recognize (“interact” with) the trans-porter protein. PDZ-domain containing proteins havebeen described to interact with the brush-border mem-brane Na/H exchange NHE-3 and to be required for itskinase-mediated regulation (293, 412, 413, 428); such reg-ulation also involves the internalization of the NHE-3exchanger. Interestingly, we recently identified a PDZ-domain containing protein (diphor-1) that colocalizedwith the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter in brush borders andinteracting with the COOH-terminal cytosolic portion ofthe molecule (93, 418, 418a). When coexpressed in oo-cytes with the type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter protein, adiphor-1-induced specific increase in Na-Pi cotransportactivity was observed without a stimulatory effect onNa-SO4 cotransport after coexpression with a cloned Na-SO4 cotransporter (93). Interacting proteins might be re-quired for brush-border expression of type II Na-Pi co-transporter and/or for its regulation. However, the preciserole of above-mentioned PDZ-domain containing proteins(e.g., diphor-1) in controlling the apical expression of thetransporter is not yet established.

VI. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

The type IIa Na-Pi cotransporter located in the renalproximal tubular brush-border membrane is the keyplayer in renal Pi reabsorption and thus also in overall Pi

homeostasis. Physiological regulation of the type IIa Na-Pi

cotransporter is responsible for altered renal Pi handlingand is mostly directly related to its altered brush-borderexpression. The latter involves complex membrane re-trieval and reinsertion mechanisms. Its expression canalso be abnormally regulated in different disease states(e.g., in X-linked hypophosphatemia). Transport activitymediated by the type IIa transporters in the brush-bordermembrane can also be controlled by changes in intratu-bular/intracellular pH, in transmembrane potential differ-ence, and posttranslational modification (e.g., proteinphosphorylation, reduction of S-S bridge). Finally, thetype IIa Na-Pi cotransporter gene might also be directlyaffected in autosomal disorders in renal Pi handling.

With the cloning of the type IIa cotransporter, toolsand information (gene location and structure) becomeavailable to dissect physiological regulation and patho-physiological alterations at the molecular level. In thefuture, studies on the structure/function relationship willprovide new insights into the mechanisms of cotrans-porter regulation/function. Several novel approaches tounderstand the mechanisms determining the specific re-

trieval of the transporter and the specific steps within thetransport cycle were dicussed. Finally, for an understand-ing of renal Pi handling at a molecular level, the in vitromolecular studies (e.g., in oocytes) have to be reinte-grated into the function of the entire cell, nephron, organ,and animal. Tissue-culture experiments, studies on iso-lated perfused tubules, and experiments on animals (ratsand/or mice; normal and/or genetically modified) are es-sential to develop a more detailed understanding of renalPi handling.

This review is devoted to many co-workers and collabora-tors contributing to this work over the last 10 years. The excel-lent secretarial help of Denise Neukom-Rossi and the excellentart work done by Christian Gasser are gratefully ackowledged.We also specifically acknowledge the excellent collaborationswith the laboratories of Dr. M. Levi (Dallas), Dr. H. S. Tenen-house (Montreal), Dr. S. Kempson (Indianapolis), and Dr. B.Kaissling (Zurich). A special thank goes to H. S. Tenenhouse andM. Levi for critical reading and correction of the manuscript.

This review is in memory of our dear colleague, Thomas P.Dousa (10/01/99), a leading investigator in the field of renalphosphate handling.

Major financial support by the Swiss National ScienceFoundation is gratefully acknowledged.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: H.Murer, Institute of Physiology, Univ. of Zurich, Winterthur-erstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland (E-mail:[email protected]).

REFERENCES

1. ABRAHAM MI, WOODS RE, BREEDLOVE DK, AND KEMPSON SA. Renaladaptation to low phosphate diet in diabetic rats. Am J Physiol

Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 262: F731–F736, 1992.2. ABU-SAMRA AB, JUEPPNER H, FORCE T, FREEMAN MW, KONG X-F,

SCHIPANI E, URENA P, RICHARDS J, BONVENTRE JV, POTTS JT JR, KRO-NENBERG HM, AND SEGRE GV. Expression cloning of common recep-tor for parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone relatedpeptide from rat osteoblast-like cells: a single receptor stimulatesintracellular accumulation of both cAMP and inositol trisphos-phates and increases intracellular free calcium. Proc Natl Acad Sci

USA 89: 2732–2736, 1992.3. AHLOULAY M, DECHAUX M, HASSLER CH, BOUBY N, AND BANKIR L.

Cyclic AMP is a hepatorenal link influencing natriuresis and con-tributing to glucagon-induced hyperfiltration in rats. J Clin Invest

98: 2251–2258, 1996.4. AHN DW, KIM YM, KIM KR, AND PARK YS. Cadmium binding and

sodium-dependent solute transport in renal brush-border mem-brane vesicles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 154: 212–218, 1999.

5. AHN DW AND PARK YS. Transport of inorganic phosphate in renalcortical brush-border membrane vesicles of cadmium intoxicatedrats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 133: 239–243, 1995.

6. ALCALDE AI, SARASA M, RALDUA D, ARAMAYONA J, MORALES R, BIBER J,MURER H, LEVI M, AND SORRIBAS V. Role of thyroid hormone inregulation of renal phosphate transport in young and aged rats.Endocrinology 140: 1544–1551, 1999.

7. ALLON M AND HRUSKA KA. Renal adaptation to dietary phosphaterestriction in rats. Interactions with insulin and calcitrol. Diabetes

40: 1134–1140, 1991.8. ALLON M AND PARRIS M. Calcitriol stimulates Na1/Pi cotransport in

a subclone of opossum kidney cells (OK-7A) by genomic mecha-nism. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 264: F404–F410, 1993.

1398 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 27: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

9. ALLON M, RODRIGUEZ M, AND LLACH F. Insulin in the acute renaladaptation to dietary phosphate restriction in the rat. Kidney Int

37: 14–20, 1990.10. AL-MAHROUQ HA AND KEMPSON SA. Photoaffinity labeling of brush-

border membrane proteins which bind phosphonoformic acid.J Biol Chem 266: 1422–1427, 1991.

11. AMBUHL PM, ZAJICEK HK, WANG H, PUTTAPARTHI K, AND LEVI M.Regulation of renal phosphate transport by acute and chronicmetabolic acidosis in the rat. Kidney Int 53: 1288–1298, 1998.

12. AMIEL C, KUNTZIGER H, COUETTE S, COUREAU C, AND BERGOUNIOUX N.Evidence for a parathyroid hormone-independent calcium modula-tion of phosphate transport along the nephron. J Clin Invest 57:256–263, 1976.

13. AMIEL C, KUNTZIGER H, AND RICHET G. Micropuncture study of han-dling of phosphate by proximal and distal nephron in normal andparathyroidectomized rats. Evidence for a distal reabsorption.

Pflugers Arch 317: 93–109, 1970.14. AMSTUTZ M, MOHRMANN M, GMAJ P, AND MURER H. Effect of pH on

phosphate transport in rat renal brush-border membrane vesicles.Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 248: F705–F710,1985.

15. ARAR M, BAUM M, BIBER J, MURER H, AND LEVI M. Epidermal growthfactor inhibits Na-Pi cotransport and mRNA in OK cells. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 268: F309–F314, 1995.16. ARAR M, LEVI M, AND BAUM M. Maturational effects of glucocorti-

coids on neonatal brush-border membrane phosphate transport.Pediatr Res 35: 474–478, 1994.

17. ARAR M, ZAJICEK HK, ELSHIHABI I, AND LEVI M. Epidermal growthfactor inhibits Na-Pi cotransport in weaned and suckling rats. Am J

Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F72–F78, 1999.18. AZZAROLO AM, RITCHIE G, AND QUAMME GA. Some characteristics of

sodium independent phosphate transport across renal basolateralmembranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1064: 229–234, 1991.

19. BAINES AD AND DRANGOVA R. Does dopamine use several signalpathways to inhibit Na-Pi-transport in OK cells. J Am Soc Nephrol

9: 1604–1612, 1998.20. BARAC-NIETO M, TOWD TL, AND SPITZER A. Effect of Pi restriction on

the relationship between the intracellular Pi and renal Na-Pi co-transport capacity in growing guinea pig (Abstract). Kidney Int 37:453, 1990.

21. BARAN DT. Nongenomic actions of the steroid hormone 1a,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Cell Biochem 56: 303–306, 1994.

22. BARRETT PQ AND ARONSON PS. Glucose and alanine inhibition ofphosphate transport in renal microvillus membrane vesicles. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 242: F126–F131, 1982.23. BARRETT PQ, GERTNER JM, AND RASMUSSEN H. Effect of dietary

phosphate on transport properties of pig renal microvillus vesicles.Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 239: F352–F359,1980.

24. BAUMANN K, DE ROUFFIGNAC C, ROINEL N, RUMRICH G, AND ULLRICH KJ.Renal phosphate transport: inhomogeneity of local proximal trans-port rates and sodium dependence. Pflugers Arch 356: 287–297,1975.

25. BECK L, KARAPLIS AC, AMIZUKA N, HEWSON AS, OZAWA H, AND TENEN-HOUSE HS. Targeted inactivation of Npt 2 in mice leads to severerenal phosphate wasting, hypercalciuria and skeletal annormali-ties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5372–5377, 1998.

26. BECK L, SOUMOUNOU Y, MARTEL J, KRISHNAMURTHY G, GAUTHIER C,GOODYER CG, AND TENENHOUSE HS. Pex/PEX tissue distribution andevidence for a deletion in the 39 region of the Pex gene in X-linkedhypophosphatemic mice. J Clin Invest 99: 1200–1209, 1997.

27. BECK L, TENENHOUSE HS, MEYER RA, MEYER MH, BIBER J, AND MURER

H. Renal expression of Na-phosphate cotransporter mRNA andprotein: effect of the Gy mutation and low phosphate diet. Pflugers

Arch 431: 936–941, 1996.28. BECK N, WEBSTER SK, AND REINECK HJ. Effect of fasting on tubular

phosphorous reabsorption. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 237: F241–F246, 1979.29. BEERS KW, CHINI EN, AND DOUSA TP. All-trans-retinoic acid stimu-

lates synthesis of cyclic ADP-ribose in renal epithelial cells. J Clin

Invest 95: 2385–2390, 1995.30. BEERS KW, CHINI EN, LEE HC, AND DOUSA TP. Metabolism of cyclic

ADP-ribose in opossum kidney renal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol

Cell Physiol 268: C741–C746, 1995.31. BEERS KW AND DOUSA TP. Thyroid hormone stimulates the Na1-PO4

symporter in the renal brush border. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 265: F323–F326, 1993.32. BEERS KW, THOMSON MA, CHINI EN, AND DOUSA TP. b-Estradiol

inhibits Na1/Pi cotransport across renal brush-border membranesfrom ovarectomized rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 221:442–445, 1996.

33. BELIVEAU R, DEMEULE M, IBNOUL-KHATIB H, BERGERON M, BEAUREGARD

G, AND POTIER M. Radiation-inactivation studies on brush-border-membrane vesicles. General considerations, and application to theglucose and phosphate carriers. Biochem J 252: 807–813, 1988.

34. BELIVEAU R AND STREVEY J. Kinetic model for phosphate transport inrenal brush-border membranes. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electro-

lyte Physiol 249: F329–F336, 1988.35. BELIVEAU R AND STREVEY J. Phosphate transport in kidneys: effect of

transmembrane electrical potential. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 261: F663–F669, 1991.36. BERNDT TJ AND KNOX FG. Proximal tubule site of inhibition of

phosphate reabsorption by calcitonin. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 246: F927–F930, 1984.37. BERNDT TJ AND KNOX FG. Renal regulation of phosphate excretion.

In: The Kidney, Physiology and Pathophysiology, edited by SeldinDW and Giebisch G. New York: Raven, 1992, p. 2511–2532.

38. BEVINGTON A, KEMP GJ, GRAHAM R, AND RUSSELL RGG. Phosphatesensitive enzymes: a possible molecular basis for cellular disordersof phosphate metabolism. Clin Chem Enzyme Commun 4: 235–257, 1992.

39. BIBER J, CUSTER M, MAGAGNIN S, HAYES G, WERNER A, LOTSCHER M,KAISSLING B, AND MURER H. Renal Na/Pi cotransporters. Kidney Int

49: 981–985, 1995.40. BIBER J, CUSTER M, WERNER A, KAISLLING B, AND MURER H. Localiza-

tion of NaPi-1, a putative Na/Pi cotransporter, in rabbit kidneyproximal tubules. Part II. Localization by immunohistochemistry.

Pflugers Arch 424: 210–215, 1993.41. BIBER J, FORGO J, AND MURER H. Modulation of Na/Pi cotransport in

opossum cells by extracellular phosphate. Am J Physiol Cell

Physiol 255: C155–C161, 1988.42. BIBER J, MALMSTROM K, SCALERA V, AND MURER H. Phosphorylation of

rat kidney proximal tubular brush-border membranes. Role ofcAMP dependent protein phosphorylation in the regulation ofphosphate transport. Pflugers Arch 398: 221–226, 1983.

43. BIBER J, AND MURER H. Na/Pi cotransport in LLC-PK1 cells: fastadaptive response to Pi deprivation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 249:C430–C434, 1985.

44. BINDELS RJM, GEERTSEN JAM, AND VAN OS CH. Increased transportof inorganic phosphate in renal brush borders of spontaneouslyhypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol

250: F470–F475, 1986.45. BIRNIR B, LOO DDF, AND WRIGHT EM. Voltage clamp studies of the

Na/glucose cotransporter cloned from rabbit small intestine.Pflugers Arch 418: 78–95, 1990.

46. BONJOUR JP AND CAVERZASIO J. Phosphate transport in the kidney.Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 100: 161–214, 1984.

47. BOROSS M, KINSELLA J, CHENG L, AND SACKTOR B. Glucocorticoids andmetabolic acidosis-induced renal transports of inorganic phos-phate, calcium and NH4. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 250: F827–F833, 1986.48. BOYER CJC, XIAO Y, DUGRE A, VINCENT E, DELISLE MC, AND BELIVEAU

R. Phosphate deprivation induces overexpression of two proteinsrelated to the rat renal phosphate cotransporter NaPi-2. Biochim

Biophys Acta 1281: 117–123, 1996.49. BRAZY PC, GULLANS SR, MANDEL LJ, AND DENNIS VW. Metabolic

requirement for inorganic phosphate by the rabbit proximal tubule:evidence for a crabtree effect. J Clin Invest 70: 53–62, 1982.

50. BROER ST, SCHUSTER A, WAGNER C, BROER A, FORSTER I, BIBER J,MURER H, LANG F, AND BUSCH AE. Chloride conductance and Pi-transport are separate functions induced by the expression ofNaPi-1 in Xenopus oocytes. J Membr Biol 164: 71–77, 1998.

51. BROWN E, POLLACK MM, AND HEBERT SC. The extracellular calcium-sensing receptor: its role in health and disease. Annu Rev Med 49:15–29, 1998.

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1399

Page 28: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

52. BRUNETTE MG, BELIVEAU R, AND CHAN M. Effect of temperature andpH on phosphate transport through brush-border membrane vesi-cles in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 62: 229–234, 1984.

53. BRUNETTE MG, CHAN M, MAAG U, AND BELIVEAU R. Phosphate uptakeby superficial and deep nephron brush-border membranes. Effectof dietary phosphate and parathyroid hormone. Pflugers Arch 400:356–362, 1984.

54. BRUNSKILL NJ, STUART J, TOBIN AB, WALLS J, AND NAHORSKI S. Recep-tor-mediated endocytosis of albumin by kidney proximal tubulecells is regulated by phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase. J Clin Invest

101: 2140–2150, 1998.55. BURCKHARDT G, STERN H, AND MURER H. The influence of pH on

phosphate transport into renal brush-border membrane vesicles.Pflugers Arch 390: 191–197, 1981.

56. BUSCH AE, BIBER J, MURER H, AND LANG F. Electrophysiologicalinsights of type I and II Na/Pi transporters. Kidney Int 49: 986–987,1996.

57. BUSCH AE, SCHUSTER A, WALDEGGER S, WAGNER CA, ZEMPEL G, BROER

S, BIBER J, MURER H, AND LANG F. Expression of a renal typesodium/phosphate transporter (NaPi-1) induces a conductance inXenopus oocytes permeable for organic and inorganic anions. Proc

Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5347–5351, 1996.58. BUSCH AE, WAGNER CA, SCHUSTER A, WALDEGGER S, BIBER J, MURER

H, AND LANG F. Properties of electrogenic Pi transport by humanrenal brush border Na1/Pi transporter. J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 1547–1551, 1995.

59. BUSCH AE, WALDEGGER S, HERZER T, BIBER J, MARKOVICH D, HAYES G,MURER H, AND LANG F. Electrophysiological analysis of Na1/Pi

cotransport mediated by a transporter cloned from rat kidney andexpressed in Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8205–8208, 1994.

60. CAI Q, HODGSON SF, KAO PC, LENNON VA, KLEE GG, ZINSMIESTER AR,AND KUMAR R. Inhibition of renal phosphate transport by a tumorproduct in a patient with oncogenic osteomalacia. N Engl J Med

330: 1645–1649, 1994.61. CAVERZASIO J AND BONJOUR JP. Mechanism of rapid phosphate (Pi)

transport adaptation to a single meal in rat renal brush-bordermembranes. Pflugers Arch 404: 227–331, 1985.

62. CAVERZASIO J AND BONJOUR JP. Influence of calcium on phosphatetransport in cultured kidney epithelium. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 254: F217–F222, 1988.63. CAVERZASIO J AND BONJOUR JP. Insulin-like growth factor 1 stimu-

lates Na-dependent Pi transport in cultured kidney cells. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 257: F712–F717, 1989.64. CAVERZASIO J, BROWN CDA, BIBER J, BONJOUR J-P, AND MURER H.

Adaptation of phosphate transport in phosphate-deprived LLC-PK1

cells. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 248: F122–F127, 1985.

65. CAVERZASIO J, MONTESSUIT C, AND BONJOUR J-P. Stimulatory effect ofinsulin-like growth factor-1 on renal Pi transport and plasma 1,25-dihydroxi-vitamin D3. Endocrinology 127: 453–459, 1990.

66. CAVERZASIO J, MURER H, FLEISCH H, AND BONJOUR J-P. Phosphatetransport in brush-border membrane vesicles isolated from renalcortex of young growing and adult rats: comparison with wholekidney data. Pflugers Arch 394: 217–221, 1982.

67. CAVERZASIO J, RIZZOLI R, AND BONJOUR JP. Sodium dependent phos-phate transport inhibited by parathyroid hormone and cyclic AMPstimulation in an opossum kidney cell line. J Biol Chem 261:3233–3237, 1986.

68. CHABARDES D, GAGNAN-BRUNETTE M, IMBERT-TEBOUL M, GONTCHAREVS-KAIA O, MONTEGUT M, CLIQUE A, AND MOREL F. Adenylate cyclaseresponsiveness to hormones in various portions of the humannephron. J Clin Invest 65: 439–448, 1980.

69. CHABARDES D, IMBERT M, CLIQUE A, MONTEGUT M, AND MOREL F.PTH-sensitive adenylate cyclase activity in different segments ofthe rabbit nephron. Pflugers Arch 354: 229–236, 1975.

70. CHABARDES D, IMBERT-TEBOUL M, MONTEGUT M, CLIQUE A, AND MOREL

F. Catecholamine sensitive adenylate cyclase activity in differentsegments of the rabbit nephron. Pflugers Arch 36: 9–15, 1975.

71. CHALUMEAU C, LAMBLIN D, BOURGEOIS S, BORENSZTEIN P, CHAMBREY R,BRUNEVAL P, VAN HUYEN JPD, FROISSART M, BIBER J, PAILLARD M,KELLERMANN O, AND POGGIOLI J. Kidney cortex cells derived from

SV40 transgenic mice retain intrinsic properties of polarized prox-imal tubule cells. Kidney Int 56: 559–570, 1999.

72. CHANG AC AND REDDEL RR. Identification of a second stanniocalcincDNA in mouse and human: stanniocalcin 2. Mol Cell Endocrinol

141: 95–99, 1998.73. CHASE LR AND AURBACH GD. Parathyroid function and the renal

excretion of 39,59-adenylic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 58: 518–525, 1967.

74. CHEN TC, HUMPIERRES J, HANNA D, PERREGAUX SB, AND PUSCHETT JB.Volume expansion-induced changes in renal tubular membraneprotein phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 143: 74–80, 1987.

75. CHEN XZ, COADY MJ, AND LAPOINTE J-Y. Fast voltage clamp disclosesa new component of presteady-state currents from the Na1-glucosecotransporter. Biophys J 71: 2544–2552, 1996.

76. CHENG L, DERSCH C, KRAUS E, SPECTOR D, AND SACKTOR B. Renaladaptation to phosphate load in the acutely thyroparathyroidecto-mized rat: rapid alteration in brush-border membrane phosphatetransport. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 246: F488–F494, 1984.

77. CHENG L, LIANG CT, PRECHT P, AND SACKTOR B. Alpha-2 adrenergicmodulation of the parathyroid hormone dependent inhibition ofphosphate uptake in cultured renal (OK) cells. Biochem Biophys

Res Commun 155: 74–82, 1988.78. CHENG L, LIANG CT, AND SACKTOR B. Phosphate uptake by renal

membrane vesicles of rabbits adapted to high and low phosphorusdiets. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 245: F175–F180, 1983.

79. CHENG L, PRECHT P, FRANK D, AND LIANG CT. Dopamine stimulationof cAMP production in cultured opossum kidney cells. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 258: F877–F882, 1990.80. CHENG L AND SACKTOR B. Sodium gradient dependent phosphate

transport in renal brush-border membrane vesicles. J Biol Chem

256: 1556–1564, 1981.81. CHONG SS, KOZAK CA, LIU L, KRISTJANSSON K, DUNN ST, BOURDEAU JE,

AND HUGHES MR. Cloning, genetic mapping and expression analysisof a mouse renal sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 268: F1038–F1045, 1995.82. CHONG SS, KRISTJANSSON K, ZOGHBI HY, AND HUGHES MR. Molecular

cloning of the cDNA encoding a human renal sodium phosphatetransport protein and its assignment to chromosome 6p21.3-p23.

Genomics 18: 355–359, 1993.83. CHRISTENSEN EI AND NIELSEN S. Structural and functional features of

protein handling in the kidney proximal tubule. Semin Nephrol 11:414–439, 1991.

84. CIEN ML, O’NEILL E, AND GARCIA JV. Phosphate depletion enhancesthe stability of the amphotropic murine leukemia virus receptormRNA. Virology 240: 109–117, 1998.

85. COLE JA, EBER SL, POELLING RE, THORNE PK, AND FORTE LR. A dualmechanism for regulation of kidney phosphate transport by para-thyroid hormone. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 253: E221–E227,1987.

86. COLE JA, FORTE LR, EBER S, THORNE PK, AND POELLING RE. Regula-tion of sodium-dependent phosphate transport by parathyroid hor-mone in opossum kidney cells: adenosine 39,59-monophosphate-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Endocrinology 122:2981–2989, 1988.

87. COLLINS JF AND GISHAN FK. Molecular cloning, functional expres-sion, tissue distribution and in situ hybridization of the renal so-dium phosphate (Na/Pi) transporter in the control and hypophos-phatemic mouse. FASEB J 8: 862–868, 1994.

88. COLLINS JF AND GHISHAN FK. The molecular defect in the renalsodium-phosphate transporter expression pathway of Gyro (Gy)mice is distinct from that of hypophosphatemic (Hyp) mice.FASEB J 10: 751–759, 1996.

89. COLLINS JF, SCHEVING LA, AND GHISHAN FK. Decreased transcriptionof the sodium-phosphate transporter gene in the hypophos-phatemic mouse. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol

269: F439–F448, 1995.90. COURJAULT-GAUTIER F, LE GRIMELLEC C, GIOCONDI MC, AND TOUTAIN

HJ. Modulation of sodium-coupled uptake and membrane fluidityby cisplatin in renal proximal tubular cells in primary culture andbrush-border membrane vesicles. Kidney Int 47: 1048–1056, 1995.

1400 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 29: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

91. CUSTER M, LOTSCHER M, BIBER J, MURER H, AND KAISSLING B. Expres-sion of Na/Pi cotransport in rat kidney: localization by RT-PCR andimmunohistochemistry. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 266: F767–F774, 1994.92. CUSTER M, MEIER F, SCHLATTER E, GREGER R, GARCIA-PEREZ A, BIBER

J, AND MURER H. Localization of NaPi-1, a putative Na/Pi cotrans-porter, in rabbit kidney proximal tubules. Part I: mRNA localizationby RT-PCR. Pflugers Arch 424: 203–209, 1993.

93. CUSTER M, SPINDLER B, VERREY F, MURER H, AND BIBER J. Identifica-tion of a new gene product (Diphor-1) regulated by dietary phos-phate. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F801–F806, 1997.

94. DANISI G AND MURER H. Inorganic phosphate absorption in smallintestine. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Gastrointestinal Sys-

tem. Intestinal Absorption and Secretion. Bethesda, MD: Am.Physiol. Soc., 1991, sect. 6, vol. IV, chapt. 12, p. 323–336.

95. DEBIEC H AND LORENC R. Identification of Na1, Pi-binding protein inkidney and intestinal brush-border membranes. Biochem J 255:185–191, 1988.

96. DE LA HORRA C, HERNANDO N, STANGE G, FORGO J, FORSTER I, KARIM

JIMINEZ Z, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Molecular characterization of thepH-dependence of the type IIa Na/Pi cotransporter. J Biol Chem.

275: 6284–6287, 2000.97. DELISLE MC, BOYER C, VACHON V, GIROUX S, AND BELIVEAU R. Immu-

nodetection and characterization of proteins implicated in renalsodium/phosphate cotransport. Biochim Biophys Acta 1190: 289–296, 1994.

98. DELISLE MC, VACHON V, GIROUX S, POTIER M, LAPRADE R, AND

BELIVEAU R. Molecular size of the renal sodium/phosphate sym-porter in native and reconstituted systems. Biochim Biophys Acta

1104: 132–136, 1992.99. DENNIS VW AND BRAZY PC. Sodium phosphate, glucose, bicarbonate

and alanine interactions in the isolated proximal convoluted tubuleof the rabbit kidney. J Clin Invest 62: 387–397, 1978.

100. DENNIS VW AND BRAZY PC. Divalent anion transport in isolated renaltubules. Kidney Int 22: 498–506, 1982.

101. DENNIS VW. Phosphate homeostasis. In: Handbook of Physiology.

Renal Physiology. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1992 sect. 8,vol. II, chapt. 37, p. 1785–1815.

102. DENNIS VW. Phosphate metabolism: contribution of different cellu-lar compartments. Kidney Int 49: 938–942, 1996.

103. DE TOLEDO FGS, BEERS KW, BERNDT TJ, THOMPSON MA, TYCE GM,KNOX FG, AND DOUSA TP. Opposite paracrine effects of 5-HT anddopamine on Na1-Pi cotransport in opossum kidney cells. Kidney

Int 52: 152–156, 1997.104. DE TOLEDO FGS, THOMSON FGS, BOLLIGER C, TYCE GM, AND DOUSA

TP. Administration of g-L-glutamyl-L-DOPA inhibits Na1-phosphatecotransport across renal brush-border membranes and increasesrenal excretion of phosphate. Kidney Int 55: 1832–1842, 1999.

105. DI MATTIA GE, VARGESE R, AND WAGNER GF. Molecular cloning andcharacterization of stanniocalcin related protein. Mol Cell Endocri-

nol 146: 137–140, 1998.106. DIXON PH, CHRISTIE PT, WOODING C, TRUMP D, GRIEFF M, HOLM I,

GERTNER JM, SCHMIDKE J, SHAH N, SMITH C, TAU C, SCHLESSINGER D,WHYTE MP, AND THAKKER RV. Mutational analysis of the PHEX genein X-linked hypophosphataemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 3615–3623, 1998.

107. DOUSA TP. Modulation of renal Na1/Pi cotransport by hormonesacting via genomic mechanism and by metabolic factors. Kidney

Int 49: 997–1004, 1996.108. DOUSA TP, DUARTE CG, AND KNOX FG. Effect of colchicine on urinary

phosphate and regulation by parathyroid hormone. Am J Physiol

231: 61–65, 1976.109. DREZNER MK AND BURCH WM JR. Altered activity of the nucleotide

regulatory site in the parathyroid hormone-sensitive adenylate cy-clase from the renal cortex of a patient with pseudohypoparathy-roidism. J Clin Invest 62: 1222–1227, 1978.

110. ECONS MJ. Positional cloning of the HYP gene: a review. Kidney Int

49: 1033–1037, 1996.111. ECONS MJ AND DREZNER MK. Tumor-induced osteomalacia: unveiling

a new hormone. N Engl J Med 330: 1679–1681, 1994.112. ECONS MJ AND FRANCIS F. Positional cloning of the PEX gene: new

insights into the pathophysiology of X-linked hypophosphatemicrickets. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F489–F498, 1997.

113. ECONS MJ, MCENERY PT, LENNON F, AND SPEER MC. Autosomaldominant hypophosphatemic rickets is linked to chromosome12p13. J Clin Invest 100: 2656–2657, 1997.

114. ELGAVISH A, RIFKIND J, AND SACKTOR B. In vitro effects of vitamin D3

on the phospholipids of isolated renal brush-border membranes. J

Membr Biol 72: 85–91, 1983.115. ELKJAER ML, BIRN H, AGRE P, CHRISTENSEN S, AND NIELSEN S. Effects

of microtubule disruption on endocytosis, membrane recycling andpolarized disruption of aquaporin-1 and gp330 in proximal tubulecells. Eur J Cell Biol 67: 57–52, 1995.

116. ESCOUBET B, DJABALI K, AND AMIEL C. Adaptation to Pi deprivation ofcell Na-dependent Pi uptake: a widespread process. Am J Physiol

Cell Physiol 256: C322–C328, 1989.117. ESKANDARI S, LOO DD, DAI G, LEVY O, WRIGHT EM, AND CARRASCO N.

Thyroid Na1/I2 symporter. Mechanism, stoichiometry and spe-cificty. J Biol Chem 272: 27230–27238, 1997.

118. ESPINOSA RE, KELLER MJ, YUSUFI ANK, AND DOUSA P. Effect ofthyroxine administration on phosphate transport across renal cor-tical brush-border membrane. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electro-

lyte Physiol 246: F133–F139, 1984.119. EUZET S, LELIEVRE-PEGORIER M, AND MERLET-BENICHOU C. Maturation

of rat renal phosphate transport: effect of triiodothyronine.J Physiol (Lond) 488: 449–457, 1995.

120. EVERS C, MURER H, AND KINNE R. Effect of parathyrin on the trans-port properties of isolated renal brush border vesicles. Biochem J

172: 49–56, 1978.121. FEILD JA, ZHANG L, BRUN KA, BROOKS DP, AND EDWARDS RM. Cloning

and functional characterization of a sodium-dependent phosphatetransporter expressed in human lung and small intestine. Biochem

Biophys Res Commun 258: 578–582, 1999.122. FORSTER I, HERNANDO N, BIBER J, AND MURER H. The voltage depen-

dence of a cloned mammalian renal type II Na1/Pi cotransporter(NaPi-2). J Gen Physiol 112: 1–18, 1998.

123. FORSTER I, LOO DDF, AND ESKANDARI S. Stoichiometry and Na1-binding cooperativity of rat and flounder renal type II Na1-Pi

cotransporters. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F644–F649, 1999.124. FORSTER I, STANGE G, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Kinetic characterization

of the pH-dependence of the type II Na/Pi cotransporters. Biophys

J. In press.125. FORSTER I, TRAEBERT M, JANKOWSKI M, STANGE G, BIBER J, AND MURER

H. Protein kinase C acivators induce membrane retrieval of type IINa1-phosphate cotransporters expressed in Xenopus oocytes.J Physiol (Lond) 517: 327–340, 1999.

126. FORSTER I, WAGNER CA, BUSCH AE, LANG F, BIBER J, HERNANDO N,MURER H, AND WERNER A. Electrophysiological characterization ofthe flounder type II Na/Pi cotransporter (NaPi-5) expressed inXenopus laevis oocytes. J Membr Biol 160: 9–25, 1997.

127. FREIBERG JM, KINSELLA J, AND SACKTOR B. Glucocorticoids increasethe Na1-H1 exchange and decrease the Na1 gradient-dependentphosphate-uptake systems in renal brush-border membrane vesi-cles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 4932–4936, 1982.

128. FRIEDLANDER G. Regulation of renal phosphate handling: recentfindings. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 5: 316–320, 1996.

129. FRIEDLANDER G AND AMIEL C. Autocrine/paracrine control of renalphosphate transport. Kidney Int 57: S148–S153, 1996.

130. FRIEDLANDER G AND AMIEL C. Extracellular nucleotides as modula-tors of renal tubular transport. Kidney Int 47: 1500–1506, 1995.

131. FRIEDLANDER G, COUETTE S, COUREAU C, AND AMIEL C. Mechanismswhereby extracellular adenosine 39,59-monophosphate inhibitsphosphate transport in cultured opossum kidney cells and in ratkidney. Physiological implications. J Clin Invest 90: 848–858, 1992.

132. FRIEDLANDER G, PRIE D, SIEGFRIED G, AND AMIEL C. Role of renalhandling of extracellular nucleotides in modulation of phosphatetransport. Kidney Int 49: 1019–1022, 1996.

133. FROMTER E. Viewing the kidney through microelectrodes. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 247: F695–F705, 1984.134. FUCENTESE M, WINTERHALTER K, MURER H, AND BIBER J. Functional

expression of rat renal Na1/Pi cotransport (NaPi-2) in Sf9 cells bythe Baculovirus system. J Membr Biol 144: 43–48, 1995.

135. FUCENTESE M, WINTERHALTER K, MURER H, AND BIBER J. Functionalexpression and purification of histidine-tagged rat renal Na/phos-phate (NaPi-2) and Na/sulfate (NaSi-1) cotransporters. J Membr

Biol 160: 111–117, 1997.

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1401

Page 30: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

136. GAZIT D, TIEDER M, LIBERMAN UA, PASSI-EVEN L, AND BAB A. Osteo-malacia in hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalci-uria: a correlative clinical-histomorphometric study. J Clin Endo-

crinol Metab 72: 229–235, 1991.137. GLAHN RP, ONSGARD MJ, TYCE GM, CHINNOW SL, KNOX FG, AND DOUSA

TP. Autocrine/paracrine regulation of renal Na1-phosphate co-transport by dopamine. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 264: F618–F622, 1993.138. GMAJ P AND MURER H. Cellular mechanisms of inorganic phosphate

transport in the kidney. Physiol Rev 66: 36–70, 1986.139. GOLIGORSKY M, MENTON DN, AND HRUSKA KA. Parathyroid hormone-

induced changes of the brush border topography and cytoskeletonin cultured renal proximal tubular cells. J Membr Biol 92: 151–162,1986.

140. GOODYER PR, KACHRA Z, BELL C, AND ROZEN R. Renal tubular cells arepotential targets for epidermal growth factor. Am J Physiol Renal

Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 255: F1191–F1196, 1988.141. GREENBERG A, PARKINSON DK, FETTEROLF DE, PUSCHETT JB, ELLIS KJ,

WIELOPOLSKI L, VASWANI AN, COHN SH, AND LANDRIGAN PJ. Effects ofelevated lead and cadmium burdens on renal function and calciummetabolism. Arch Environ Health 41: 69–76, 1986.

142. GREGER R, LANG F, MARCHAND G, AND KNOX FG. Site of renal phos-phate reabsorption. Micropuncture and microinfusion study.

Pflugers Arch 369: 11–118, 1977.143. GRINSTEIN S, TURNER RJ, SILVERMAN M, AND ROTHSTEIN A. Inorganic

anion transport in kidney and intestinal brush border and basolat-eral membranes. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 238:F452–F460, 1980.

144. GULLANS SR, BRAZY PC, MANDEL LJ, AND DENNIS V. Stimulation ofphosphate transport in the proximal tubule by metabolic sub-strates. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 247: F582–F587, 1984.

145. GUPTA A, GUO XL, ALVAREZ UM, AND HRUSKA KA. Regulation ofsodium-dependent phosphate transport in osteoclasts. J Clin In-

vest 100: 538–548, 1997.146. HAAS JA, BERNT T, AND KNOX FG. Nephron heterogeneity of phos-

phate reabsorption. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol

234: F287–F290, 1978.147. HAFDI Z, COUETTE S, COMOY E, PRIE D, AMIEL C, AND FRIEDLANDER G.

Locally formed 5-hydroxytryptamine stimulates phosphate trans-port in cultured opossum kidney cells and in rat kidney. Biochem

J 320: 615–621, 1996.148. HAGENBUCH B AND MURER H. Phosphate transport across the baso-

lateral membrane from rat kidney cortex: sodium-dependence?Pflugers Arch 407: S149–S155, 1986.

149. HAMMERMAN MR. Phosphate transport across renal proximal tubu-lar cell membranes. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol

251: F385–F398, 1986.150. HAMMERMAN MR. The growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor

axis in the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol

257: F503–F514, 1989.151. HAMMERMAN MR AND GAVIN JR. Binding of IGF-I and IGF-I-stimu-

lated phosphorylation in canine renal basolateral plasma mem-branes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 251: E32–E41, 1986.

152. HAMMERMAN MR AND HRUSKA KA. Cyclic AMP-dependent proteinphosphorylation in canine renal brush-border membrane vesicles isassociated with decreased phosphate transport. J Biol Chem 257:992–999, 1982.

153. HAMMERMAN MR, KARL IE, AND HRUSKA KA. Regulation of caninerenal vesicle Pi transport by growth hormone and parathyroidhormone. Biochim Biophys Acta 603: 322–335, 1980.

154. HAMMERMAN MR AND ROGERS SA. Distribution of IGF receptors inthe plasma membrane of proximal tubular cells. Am J Physiol

Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 253: F841–F847, 1987.155. HAMMERMAN MR, ROGERS S, HANSEN VA, AND GAVIN JR. Insulin stim-

ulated Pi transport in brush border vesicles from proximal tubularsegments. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 247: E616–E624, 1984.

156. HAMMOND TG, YUSUFI ANK, KNOX FG, AND DOUSA TP. Administrationof atrial natriuretic factor inhibits sodium-coupled transport inproximal tubules. J Clin Invest 75: 1983–1989, 1985.

156a.HAN HJ, KIM DH, AND PARK SH. Regulatory mechanisms of Na/Pi

cotransporter by glucocorticoid in renal proximal tubule cells:

involvement of cAMP and PKC. Kidney Blood Pressure Res 23: 1–9,2000.

157. HANNUN Y. The sphingomyelin cycle and the second messengerfunction of ceramide. J Biol Chem 269: 3125–3128, 1994.

158. HANSCH E, FORGO J, MURER H, AND BIBER J. Role of microtubules inthe adaptive response to low phosphate of Na/Pi cotransport inopossum kidney cells. Pflugers Arch 422: 516–522, 1993.

159. HARAMATI A. Tubular capacitiy for phosphate reabsorption in su-perficial and deep nephrons. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 248: F729–F733, 1985.160. HARAMATI A, MULRONEY SE, AND LUMPKIN MD. Regulation of renal

phosphate reabsorption during development: implications from anew model of growth hormone deficiency. Pediatr Nephrol 4:387–391, 1990.

161. HARAMATI A, MULRONEY SE, AND WEBSTER SK. Developmentalchanges in the tubular capacity for phosphate reabsorption in therat. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 255: F287–F291,1988.

162. HARTMANN CM, HEWSON AS, KOS CH, HILFIKER H, SOUMOUNOU Y,MURER H, AND TENENHOUSE HS. Structure of murine and humanrenal type II Na-phosphate cotransporter genes (npt2 and NPT2).Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 7409–7414, 1996.

163. HARTMANN CM, WAGNER CA, BUSCH AE, MARKOVICH D, BIBER J, LANG

F, AND MURER H. Transport characteristics of a murine renal Na/Pi

cotransport. Pflugers Arch 430: 830–836, 1995.164. HATAE T, ICHIMURA T, ISHIDA T, AND SAKURAI T. Apical tubular net-

work in the rat kidney proximal tubule cells studied by thick-section and scanning electron microscopy. Cell Tissue Res 288:317–325, 1997.

165. HAYES G, BUSCH A, LANG F, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Protein kinase Cconsensus sites and the regulation of renal Na/Pi cotransport(NaPi-2) expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Pflugers Arch 430:819–824, 1995.

166. HAYES G, BUSCH A, LOTSCHER M, WALDEGGER S, LANG F, VERREY F,BIBER J, AND MURER H. Role of N-linked glycosylation in rat renalNa/Pi cotransport. J Biol Chem 269: 24143–24149, 1994.

167. HAZAMA A, LOO DD, AND WRIGHT EM. Presteady-state currents of theNa1/glucose cotransporter (SGLT1). J Membr Biol 155: 175–186,1997.

168. HELPS C, MURER H, AND MCGIVAN J. Cloning, sequence analysis andexpression of the cDNA encoding a sodium-dependent phosphatetransporter from the bovine renal epithelial cell line NBL-1. Eur

J Biochem 228: 927–930, 1995.169. HERAK-KRAMBERGER CM, SPINDLER B, BIBER J, MURER H, AND SABOLIC

I. Renal type II Na/Pi cotransporter is strongly impaired whereasthe Na/sulfate cotransporter and aquaporin 1 are unchanged incadmium treated rats. Pflugers Arch 432: 336–344, 1996.

170. HERNANDO N, KARIM-JIMENEZ Z, FORGO J, BIBER J, AND MURER H.Tyrosine and dileucine motifs in internalization and membranetargeting of the type IIa Na/Pi cotransporter. J Am Soc Nephrol. Inpress.

171. HERNANDO N, SHEIKH S, KARIM-JIMENEZ Z, GALLIKER H, FORGO J, BIBER

J, AND MURER H. Asymmetrical targeting of type II Na/Pi cotrans-porters in renal and intestinal epithelial cell lines. Am J Physiol

Renal Physiol 280: F361–F368, 2000.172. HERNANDO N, TRAEBERT M, FORSTER I, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Effect

of two tyrosine mutations on the activity and regulation of the renaltype II Na1/Pi cotransporter expressed in oocytes. J Membr Biol

168: 275–282, 1999.173. HICKE L. Getting down with ubiquitin: turning off cell-surface re-

ceptors, transporters and channels. Trends Cell Biol 9: 107–112,1999.

174. HILFIKER H, HARTMANN C, STANGE G, AND MURER H. Characterizationof the 59-flanking region of the OK-cell type II Na/Pi cotransportgene. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274: F197–F204, 1998.

175. HILFIKER H, HATTENHAUER O, TRAEBERT M, FORSTER I, MURER H, AND

BIBER J. Characterization of a new murine type II sodium-phos-phate cotransporter expressed in mammalian small intestine. Proc

Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14564–14569, 1998.176. HILFIKER H, KVIETIKOVA I, HARTMANN CM, STANGE G, AND MURER H.

Characterization of the human type II Na/Pi cotransporter pro-moter. Pflugers Arch 436: 591–598, 1998.

177. HISANO S, HAGA H, LI Z, TATSUMI S, MIYAMOTO KI, TAKEDA E, AND FUKUI

1402 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 31: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

Y. Immunohistochemical and RT-PCR detection of Na1-dependentinorganic phosphate cotransporter (NaPi-2) in rat brain. Brain Res

772: 149–155, 1997.178. HOAG HH, GAUTHIER C, MARTEL I, AND TENENHOUSE HS. Effects of

Npt2 gene ablation and low Pi-diet on renal Na1-phosphate co-transport and cotransporter gene expression. J Clin Invest 104:679–686, 1999.

179. HOFFMAN N, THEES M, AND KINNE R. Phosphate transport by isolatedrenal brush border vesicles. Pflugers Arch 362: 147–156, 1976.

180. HOPPE A, LIN JT, ONSGARD M, KNOX FG, AND DOUSA TP. Quantitationof the Na/Pi cotransporter in renal cortical brush-border mem-branes. 14C-phosphonoformic acid as a useful probe to determinethe intensity and its change in response to parathyroid hormone.

J Biol Chem 266: 11528–11536, 1991.181. HRUSKA KA, KLAHR S, AND HAMMERMAN MR. Decreased luminal mem-

brane transport of phosphate in chronic renal failure. Am J Physiol

Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 242: F17–F22, 1982.182. HRUSKA KA, MILLS SC, KHALIFA S, AND HAMMERMAN MR. Phosphory-

lation of renal brush-border membrane vesicles. J Biol Chem 258:2501–2507, 1983.

183. HRUSKA KA, MOSKOWITZ D, ESBRIT P, CIVITELLI R, WESTBROOK S, AND

HUSKEY M. Stimulation of inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerolproduction in renal tubular cells by parathyroid hormone. J Clin

Invest 79: 230–239, 1987.184. HUELSEWEH B, KOHL B, HENTSCHEL H, KINNE RK, AND WERNER A.

Translated anti-sense product of the Na/phosphate co-transporter(NaPi-II). Biochem J 332: 483–489, 1998.

185. HYP CONSORTIUM. A gene (PEX) with homologies to endopepti-dases is mutated in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rick-ets. Nature Genet 11: 130–136, 1995.

186. IMBERT M, CHABARDES D, MONTEGUT M, CLIQUE A, AND MOREL F.Adenylate cyclase activity along the rabbit nephron as measured insingle isolated segments. Pflugers Arch 354: 213–228, 1975.

187. ISAAC J, BERNDT TJ, CHINNOW SL, TYCE GM, DOUSA TP, AND KNOX FG.Dopamine enhances the phosphaturic response to parathyroid hor-mone in phosphate-deprived rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 1423–1429,1992.

188. ISAAC J, GLAHN RP, APPEL MA, ONSGARD M, DOUSA TP, AND KNOX FG.Mechanisms of dopamine inhibition of renal phosphate transport.J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 1601–1607, 1992.

189. ISHIBASHI K, MIYAMOTO K, TAKETANI Y, MORITA K, SASAKI S, AND IMAI M.Molecular cloning of a second human stanniocalcin homologue(STC-2). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 250: 252–258, 1998.

190. ISHIZUYA-OKA A, STOLOW MA, UEDA S, AND SHI Y. Temporal andspatial expression of an intestinal Na/Pi cotransporter correlateswith epithelial transformation during thyroid hormone-dependentfrog metamorphosis. Dev Genet 20: 53–66, 1997.

191. JANKOWSKI M, BIBER J, AND MURER H. PTH-induced internalization ofa type IIa Na/Pi cotransporter in OK cells. Pflugers Arch. 438:689–693, 1999.

192. JEHLE AW, FORGO J, BIBER J, LEDERER E, KRAPF R, AND MURER H. Acidinduced stimulation of Na/Pi cotransport in OK cells: molecularcharacterization and effect of dexamethasone. Am J Physiol Renal

Physiol 273: F396–F403, 1997.193. JEHLE AW, FORGO J, BIBER J, LEDERER E, KRAPF R, AND MURER H.

IGF-I and vanadate stimulate Na/Pi cotransport in OK cells byincreasing type II Na/Pi cotransporter protein stability. Pflugers

Arch 437: 149–159, 1998.194. JEHLE AW, HILFIKER H, PFISTER M, BIBER J, LEDERER E, KRAPF R, AND

MURER H. Type II Na1/Pi cotransport is regulated at the transcrip-tional level by ambient bicarbonate/carbon dioxide tension inOpossum kidney cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F46–F53,1999.

195. JETTE M, VACHON V, POTIER M, AND BELIVEAU R. The renal sodium/phosphate symporters—evidence for different functional oligo-meric states. Biochemistry 35: 15209–15214, 1996.

196. JUPPNER H, ABOU-SAMRA A-B, FREEMAN M, KONG XF, SCHIPANI E,RICHARDS J, KANEDA Y, AND BELLO-REUSS E. Effect of dopamine onphosphate reabsorption in isolated perfused rabbit proximal tu-bules. Miner Electrolyte Metab 9: 147–150, 1983.

197. KARIM-JIMENEZ Z, HERNANDO N, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Requirementof a leucine residue for (apical) membrane expression of type IIBNa/Pi-cotransporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97: 2916–2921, 2000.

198. KARIM-JIMENEZ Z, HERNANDO N, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Molecularsignals in PTH-dependent endocytosis of type IIa Na/Pi cotrans-porters. Proc Natl Acad. Sci USA. In press.

199. KATAI K, SEGAWA H, HAGA H, MORITA K, ARAI H, TATSUMI S, TAKETANI

Y, MIYAMOTO K, HISANO S, FUKUI Y, AND TAKEDA E. Acute regulationby dietary phosphate of the sodium-dependent phosphate trans-porter (NaPi-2) in rat kidney. J Biochem 121: 50–55, 1997.

200. KAUFMANN M, MUFF R, STIEGER B, BIBER J, MURER H, AND FISCHER JA.Apical and basolateral parathyroid hormone receptors in rat renalcortical membranes. Endocrinology 134: 1173–1178, 1994.

201. KAVANAUGH MP AND KABAT D. Identification and characterization ofa widely expressed phosphate transporter/retrovirus receptor fam-ily. Kidney Int 49: 959–963, 1996.

202. KAVANAUGH MP, MILLER DG, ZHANG W, LAW W, KOZAK SL, KABAT D,AND MILLER AD. Cell-surface receptors for gibbon ape leukemiavirus and amphotropic murine retrovirus are inducible sodium-dependent phosphate symporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7071–7075, 1994.

203. KAYNE LH, D’ARGENIO DZ, MEYER JH, HU MS, JAMGOTCHIAN N, AND LEE

DBN. Analysis of segmental phosphate absorption in intact rats. Acompartmental analysis approach. J Clin Invest 91: 915–922, 1993.

204. KEMPSON SA. Effects of fasting compared to low phosphorus diet onthe kinetics of phosphate transport by renal brush-border mem-branes. Biochim Biophys Acta 815: 85–90, 1985.

205. KEMPSON SA. Novel specific inhibitors of epithelial phosphate trans-port. News Physiol Sci 3: 154–157, 1988.

206. KEMPSON SA. Peptide hormone action on renal phosphate handling.Kidney Int 49: 1005–1009, 1996.

207. KEMPSON SA, COLON-OTERO G, OU SY, TURNER ST, AND DOUSA TP.Possible role of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide as an intracel-lular regulator of renal transport of phosphate in the rat. J Clin

Invest 67: 1347–1360, 1981.208. KEMPSON SA, HELMLE-KOLB C, ABRAHAM MI, AND MURER H. Parathy-

roid hormone action on phosphate transport is inhibited by highosmolality. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 258:F1336–F1344, 1990.

209. KEMPSON SA, HELMLE-KOLB C, AND MURER H. Endocytosis and phos-phate transport in OK epithelial cells. Renal Physiol Biochem 12:359–364, 1989.

210. KEMPSON SA, LOTSCHER M, KAISSLING B, BIBER J, MURER H, AND LEVI M.Parathyroid hormone action on phosphate transporter mRNA andprotein in rat renal proximal tubules. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 268: F784–F791, 1995.211. KEMPSON SA, YING AL, MCATEER JA, AND MURER H. Endocytosis and

Na1/solute cotransport in renal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 264:18451–18456, 1989.

212. KEUSCH I, TRAEBERT M, LOTSCHER M, KAISSLING B, MURER H, AND BIBER

J. Parathyroid hormone and dietary phosphate provoke lysosomalrouting of the proximal tubular Na/Pi cotransporter type II. Kidney

Int 54: 1224–1232, 1998.212a.KIDO S, MIYAMOTO K, MIZOBUCHI H, TAKETANI Y, OHKIDO I, OGAWA N,

KANEKO Y, HARASHIMA S, AND TAKEDA E. Identification of regulatorysequences and binding proteins in the type II sodium/phosphatecotransporter NPT 2 gene responsive to dietary phosphate. J Biol

Chem 274: 28256–28263, 1999.213. KIEBZAK GM AND DOUSA TP. Thyroid hormones increase renal brush-

border membrane transport of phosphate in X-linked hypophos-phatemic (Hyp) mice. Endocrinology 117: 613–619, 1985.

214. KIEBZAK GM AND SACKTOR B. Effect of age on renal conservation ofphosphate in the rat. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol

251: F399–F407, 1986.215. KIEBZAK GM, YUSUFI AN, KUSANO EBRAUN-WERNESS J, AND DOUSA TP.

ATP and cAMP system in the in vitro response of microdissectedcortical tubules to PTH. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 248: F152–F159, 1985.216. KNOCHEL JP. The clinical and physiological implications of phos-

phorus deficiency. In: The Kidney, Physiology and Pathophysiol-

ogy, edited by Seldin D and Giebisch W. New York: Raven, 1992, p.2533–2562, 1992.

217. KNOCHEL JP AND ARGARWAL R. Hypophosphatemia and hyperphos-phatemia. In: Rector’s The Kidney (5th ed.), edited by Brenner BM.Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1996, p. 1086–1133.

218. KNOX FG AND HARAMATI A. Renal regulation of phosphate excretion.

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1403

Page 32: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

In: The Kidney: Physiology and Pathphysiology, edited by SeldinGW and Giebisch G. New York: Raven, 1985, p. 1351–1396.

219. KOHL B, HUELSEWEH B, ELGER M, HENTSCHEL H, AND KINNE RK. Na-Pi

cotransport in flounder: same system in kidney and intestine. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 270: F937–F944, 1996.220. KOHL B, WAGNER CA, HUELSEWEH B, BUSCH AE, AND WERNER A. The

Na/Pi cotransport system (NaPi-II) with a cleaved backbone: impli-cations on function and membrane insertion. J Physiol (Lond) 508:341–350, 1998.

220a.KOHLER K, FORSTER JC, LAMBERT G, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Thefunctional unit of the renal type IIa Na1/Pi-cotransporter is amonomer. J Biol Chem. In press.

221. KOLESNICK J. Ceramide: a novel second messenger. Trends Cell Biol

2: 232–236, 1992.222. KOS CH, TIHY F, ECONS MJ, MURER H, LEMIEUX N, AND TENENHOUSE

HS. Localization of a renal sodium phosphate cotransporter gene tohuman chromosome 5q35. Genomics 19: 176–177, 1994.

223. KOS CH, TIHY F, MURER H, LEMIEUX N, AND TENENHOUSE HS. Com-parative mapping of Na1-phosphate cotransporte genes, NPT1 andNPT2, in human and rabbit. Cytogenet Cell Genet 75: 22–24, 1996.

224. KUMAR R. New concepts concerning the regulation of renal phos-phate excretion. News Physiol Sci 12: 211–214, 1997.

225. KUMAR R. Phosphatonin—a new phosphaturetic hormone? (Les-sons from tumour-induced osteomalacia and X-linked hypophos-phataemia). Nephrol Dial Transplant 12: 11–13, 1997.

226. KURNIK BRC AND HRUSKA KA. Effects of 1–25 dihydroxycholecalcif-erol on phosphate transport in vitamin D-deprived rats. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 247: F177–F184, 1984.227. KURNIK BRC AND HRUSKA KA. Mechanism of stimulation of renal

phosphate transport by 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. Biochim

Biophys Acta 817: 42–50, 1985.228. LAMBERT G, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Cysteine residues and the struc-

ture of the rat renal type IIa sodium/phosphate cotransporter. J

Membr Biol. In press.229. LAMBERT G, FORSTER IC, STANGE G, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Properties

of the mutant Ser-460-Cys implicate this site in a functionallyimportant region of the type IIa Na/Pi cotransporter protein. J Gen

Physiol 114: 637–651, 1999.230. LAMBERT G, TRAEBERT M, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Cleavage of disul-

fide bonds leads to inactivation and degradation of the sodiumphosphate cotransporter type IIa, but not type IIb expressed inXenopus laevis oocytes. J Membr Biol. In press.

231. LAMBERT G, TRAEBERT M, HERNANDO N, BIBER J, AND MURER H.Studies on the topology of the renal type II NaPi cotransporter.Pflugers Arch 437: 972–978, 1999.

232. LANG F, GREGER R, MARCHAND GR, AND KNOX FG. Stationary mi-croperfusion study of phosphate reabsorption in proximal anddistal nephron segments. Pflugers Arch 368: 45–48, 1977.

233. LAW F, RIZZOLI R, AND BONJOUR JP. Transforming growth factor-binhibits phosphate transport in renal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol

Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 264: F623–F628, 1993.234. LEDERER ED AND MCLEISH KR. P2 purinoceptor stimulation attenu-

ates PTH inhibition of phosphate uptake by a G protein-dependentmechanism. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 269:F309–F316, 1995.

235. LEDERER ED, SOHI SS, MATHIESEN JM, AND KLEIN JB. Regulation ofexpression of type II sodium-phosphate cotransporters by proteinkinase A and protein kinase C. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275:F270–F277, 1998.

236. LEDERER ED, SOHI SS, AND MCLEISH KR. PTH stimulates extracellularsignal-regulated kinase activity through two independent signaltransduction pathways. Role of ERK in sodium-phosphate cotrans-port. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 975–987, 1998.

237. LE GRIMELLEC C, FRIEDLANDER G, YANDOUZI EHE, ZLATKINE P, AND

GIOCONDI MC. Membrane fluidity and transport properties in epi-thelia. Kidney Int 42: 825–836, 1992.

238. LELIEVRE-PEGORIER M AND MERLET-BENICHOU C. Effects of weaningon phosphate transport maturation in the rat kidney. Clearance andbrush-border membrane studies. Pediatr Nephrol 7: 807–814, 1993.

239. LEVI M. Heterogeneity of Pi transport by BBM from superficial andjuxtamedullary cortex of rat. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 258: F1616–F1624, 1990.240. LEVI M, BAIRD BM, AND WILSON PV. Cholesterol modulates rat renal

brush-border membrane phosphate transport. J Clin Invest 85:231–237, 1980.

241. LEVI M, JAMESON DM, AND VAN DER MEER BW. Role of BBM lipidcomposition and fluidity in impaired renal Pi transport in aged rats.Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 256: F85–F94, 1989.

242. LEVI M, KEMPSON SA, LOTSCHER M, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Molecularregulation of renal phosphate transport. J Membr Biol 154: 1–9,1996.

243. LEVI M, LOTSCHER M, SORRIBAS V, CUSTER M, ARAR M, KAISSLING B,MURER H, AND BIBER J. Cellular mechanisms of acute and chronicadaptation of rat renal Pi transporter to alterations in dietary Pi.Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 267: F900–F908,1994.

244. LEVI M, SHAYMAN JA, ABE A, GROSS SK, MCCLUER RH, BIBER J, MURER

H, LOTSCHER M, AND CRONIN RE. Dexamethasone modulates ratrenal brush-border membrane phosphate transporter mRNA andprotein abundance and glycosphingolipid composition. J Clin In-

vest 96: 207–216, 1995.245. LEVINE BS, HO K, HODSMAN A, KUOROKAWA K, AND COBURN JW. Early

renal brush-border membranes adaptation to dietary phosphorous.Miner Electrolyte Metab 10: 22–227, 1984.

246. LEVINE BS, KNIBLOE KA, GOLCHINI K, HASHIMOTO S, AND KURTZ I. Renaladaptation to dietary phosphate deprivation: role of proximal tu-bule brush-border membrane fluidity. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 260: F613–F618, 1991.247. LI H, ONWOCHEI M, RUCH RJ, AND XIE Z. Regulation of rat Na/Pi

cotransporter-1 gene expression: the roles of glucose and insulin.Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 271: E1021–E1028, 1996.

248. LI H AND XIE Z. Molecular cloning of two rat Na/Pi cotransporters:evidence for differential tissue expression of transcripts. Cell Mol

Biol Res 41: 451–460, 1995.249. LIANG CT, BARNES J, BALAKIR R, CHENG L, AND SACKTOR B. In vitro

stimulation of phosphate uptake in isolated chick renal cells by1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 3532–3536, 1982.

250. LIANG CT, BARNES J, CHENG L, BALAKIR R, AND SACKTOR B. Effects of1,25-(OH)2D3 administered in vivo on phosphate uptake by isolatedchick renal cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 242: C312–C318, 1982.

251. LICOVITCH M AND CANTLEY L. Lipid second messengers. Cell 77:329–334, 1994.

252. LLOYD SE, GUNTHER W, PEARCE SH, THOMSON A, BIANCHI ML, BOSIO M,CRAIG IW, FISHER SE, SCHEINMAN SJ, WRONG O, JENTSCH TJ, AND

THAKKER RV. Characterization of renal chloride channel, CLC 5,mutations in hypercaliuric nephrolithiasis (kidney stones) disor-ders. Hum Mol Genet 6: 1233–1239, 1997.

253. LLOYD SE, PEARCE SH, GUNTHER W, KAWAGUCHI H, IGARASHI T,JENTSCH TJ, AND THAKKER RV. Idiopathic low molecular weightproteinuria associated with hypercalciuric nephrocalcinosis in Jap-anese children is due to mutations of the renal chloride channel(CLCN5). J Clin Invest 99: 967–974, 1997.

254. LOFFING J, LOTSCHER M, KAISSLING B, BIBER J, MURER H, SEIKALY M,ALPERN RJ, LEVI M, BAUM M, AND MOE OW. Renal Na/H exchangerNHE-3 and Na-PO4 cotransporter NaPi-2 protein expression in glu-cocorticoid excess and deficient states. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 1560–1567, 1998.

255. LOGHMAN-ADHAM M. Characterization of essential sulfhydryl groupsof rat renal Na-Pi cotransporter. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Elec-

trolyte Physiol 260: F874–F882, 1991.256. LOGHMAN-ADHAM M, SZCZEPANSKA-KONKEL M, AND DOUSA TP. Phos-

phate transport in brush-border membranes from uremic rats. Re-sponse to phosphonoformic acid. J Soc Nephrol 3: 1253–1259, 1992.

257. LOTSCHER M, KAISSLING B, BIBER J, MURER H, KEMPSON SA, AND LEVI M.Regulation of rat renal Na/Pi cotransporter by parathyroid hor-mone: immunohistochemistry. Kidney Int 49: 1005–1009, 1996.

258. LOTSCHER M, KAISSLING B, BIBER J, MURER H, AND LEVI M. Role ofmicrotubules in the rapid regulation of renal phosphate transportercontent. J Clin Invest 99: 1302–1312, 1997.

259. LOTSCHER M, SCARPETTA Y, LEVI M, WANG H, ZAJICEK HK, BIBER J,MURER H, AND KAISSLING B. Rapid downregulation of rat renal Na/Pi

cotransporter in response to parathyroid hormone: role of micro-tubule rearrangement. J Clin Invest 104: 483–494, 1999.

260. MAGAGNIN S, WERNER A, MARKOVICH D, SORRIBAS V, STANGE G, BIBER

1404 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 33: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

J, AND MURER H. Expression cloning of human and rat renal cortexNa/Pi cotransport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 5979–5983, 1993.

261. MALMSTROM K AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormone inhibits phos-phate transport in OK cells but not in LLC-PK1 and JTC-12.P3 cells.

Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 251: C23–C31, 1986.262. MALMSTROM K AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormone regulates phos-

phate transport in OK cells via an irreversible inactivation of amembrane protein. FEBS Lett 216: 257–260, 1987.

263. MALMSTROM K, STANGE G, AND MURER H. Identification of proximaltubular transport functions in the established kidney cell line, OK.Biochim Biophys Acta 902: 269–277, 1987.

264. MALMSTROM K, STANGE G, AND MURER H. Intracellular cascades in theparathyroid-hormone-dependent regulation of Na1/phosphate co-transport in OK cells. Biochem J 251: 207–213, 1988.

265. MARKOVICH D, FORGO J, STANGE G, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Expressioncloning of rat renal Na/SO4 cotransport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8073–8077, 1993.

266. MARKOVICH D, VERRI T, SORRIBAS V, FORGO J, BIBER J, AND MURER H.Regulation of opossum kidney (OK) cell Na/Pi cotransport by Pi

deprivation involves mRNA stability. Pflugers Arch 430: 459–463,1995.

267. MARTIN KJ, MCCONKEY CL, GARCIA JC, MONTANI D, AND BETTS CR.Protein kinase A and the effects of parathyroid hormone on phos-phate uptake in opossum kidney cells. Endocrinology 125: 295–301,1989.

268. MARTIN KJ, MCCONKEY CL, JACOB AK, GONZALEZ EA, KHAN M, AND

BALDASSARE JJ. Effect of U-73122, an inhibitor of phospholipase C,on actions of parathyroid hormone in opossum kidney cells. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 266: F254–F258, 1994.269. MCPHERSON JD, KRANE MC, WAGNER-MCPHERSON CB, KOS CH, AND

TENENHOUSE HS. High resolution mapping of the renal sodium-phosphate cotransporter gene (NPT2) confirms its localization tohuman chromosome 5Q35. Pediatr Res 41: 632–634, 1997.

270. MELLMAN I. Endocytosis and molecular sorting. Annu Rev Cell Dev

Biol 12: 575–625, 1996.271. MELTZER V, WEINREB S, BELLORIN-FONT E, AND HRUSKA KA. Parathy-

roid hormone stimulation of renal phosphoinositide metabolism isa cyclic nucleotide-independent effect. Biochim Biophys Acta 712:258–267, 1982.

272. MEYER RA, MEYER MH, AND GRAY RW. Parabiosis suggests a humoralfactor is involved in X-linked hypophosphatemia in mice. J Bone

Miner Res 4: 493–500, 1989.273. MEYER RA JR, HENLEY CM, MEYER MH, MORGAN PL, MCDONALD AG,

MILLS C, AND PRICE DK. Partial deletion of both the sperminesynthase gene and the Pex gene in the X-linked hypophosphatemic,Gyro (Gy) mouse. Genomics 48: 289–295, 1998.

274. MICHAUT P, PRIE D, AMIEL C, AND FRIEDLANDER G. New role for an olddrug: dipyridamole for renal phosphate leak. N Engl J Med 331:58–59, 1994.

275. MIYAMOTO K, SEGAWA H, MORITA K, NII T, TATSUMI S, TAKETANI Y, AND

TAKEDA E. Relative contributions of Na-dependent phosphate co-transporters to phosphate transport in mouse kidney: RNase Hmediated hybrid depletion analysis. Biochem J 327: 735–739, 1997.

276. MIYAMOTO K, TATSUMI S, SONODA T, YAMAMOTO H, MINAMI H, TAKETANI

Y, AND TAKEDA E. Cloning and functional expression of a Na-dependent phosphate cotransporter from human kidney: cDNAcloning and functional expression. Biochem J 305: 81–85, 1995.

277. MIYAMOTO K, TATSUMI S, YAMAMOTO H, KATAI K, TAKETANI Y, MORITA K,AND TAKEDA E. Chromosome assignments of genes for humanNa(1)-dependent phosphate cotransporters NaPi-3 and NPT-1. To-

kushima J Exp Med 42: 5–9, 1995.278. MIZGALA CL AND QUAMME GA. Renal handling of phosphate. Physiol

Rev 65: 431–466, 1985.279. MOLITORIS BA, ALFREY AC, HARRIS RA, AND SIMON FR. Renal apical

membrane cholesterol and fluidity in regulation of phosphate trans-port. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 249: F12–F19,1985.

280. MUFF R, FISCHER JA, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormonereceptors in control of proximal tubule function. Annu Rev Physiol

54: 67–79, 1992.281. MULRONEY SE, LUMPKIN MD, AND HARAMATI A. Antagonist to GH-

releasing factor inhibits growth and renal Pi reabsorption in imma-

ture rats. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 257: F29–F34, 1989.

282. MURER H. Cellular mechanisms in proximal tubular Pi reabsorption:some answers and more questions. J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 1649–1665,1992.

283. MURER H AND BIBER J. Renal tubular phosphate transport: cellularmechanisms. In: The Kidney, Physiology and Pathophysiology,

edited by Seldin DW and Giebisch G. New York: Raven, 1992, p.2481–2509.

284. MURER H AND BIBER J. Renal sodium-phosphate cotransport. Curr

Opin Nephrol Hypertens 3: 504–510, 1994.285. MURER H AND BIBER J. Molecular mechanisms of renal apical Na/

phosphate cotransport. Annu Rev Physiol 58: 607–618, 1996.286. MURER H AND BIBER J. Editorial overview: epithelial transport pro-

teins: physiology and pathophysiology. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10:429–434, 1998.

287. MURER H AND BIBER J. A molecular view of proximal tubular inor-ganic phosphate (Pi) reabsorption and of its regulation. Pflugers

Arch 433: 379–389, 1997.288. MURER H, FORSTER I, HERNANDO N, LAMBERT G, TRAEBERT M, AND

BIBER J. Post-transcriptional regulation of the proximal tubule Na-phosphate transporter type II in response to PTH and dietaryphosphate. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 277: F676–F684, 1999.

289. MURER H, FORSTER I, HILFIKER H, PFISTER M, KAISSLING B, LOTSCHER M,AND BIBER J. Cellular/molecular control of renal Na/Pi cotransport.Kidney Int 65: S2–S10, 1998.

290. MURER H AND HILDMANN B. Transcellular transport of calcium andinorganic phosphate in the small intestinal epithelium. Am J

Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 240: G409–G416, 1981.291. MURER H AND KINNE R. The use of isolated membrane vesicles to

study epithelial transport processes. J Membr Biol 55: 81–95, 1980.292. MURER H, LOTSCHER M, KAISSLING B, LEVI M, KEMPSON SA, AND BIBER

J. Renal brush-border membrane Na/Pi cotransport: molecular as-pects in PTH-dependent and dietary regulation. Kidney Int 49:1769–1773, 1996.

293. MURPHY A, GONZALEZ A. GOSTI C, CORDERO E, PINNEY D, CABDIA C,SOLOMON F, GUSELLA A, AND RAMESH V. NHE-RF, a regulatory cofac-tor for Na-H exchange, is a common interactor for merlin and ERM(MERM) proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 273: 1273–1276, 1998.

294. NAKAI M, FUKASE M, KINOSHITA Y, AND FUJITA T. Atrial natriureticfactor inhibits phosphate uptake in opossum kidney cells: as amodel of renal proximal tubules. Biochem Biophys Res Commun

152: 1416–1420, 1988.294a.NALBANT P, BOEHMER C, DEHMELT L, WEHNER F, AND WERNER A.

Functional characterization of a Na1-phosphate cotransporter(NaP1-II) from zebrafish and identification of related transcripts.J Physiol (Lond) 520: 79–89, 1999.

295. NESBITT T, COFFMAN TM, GRIFFITHS R, AND DREZNER MK. Cross-transplantation of kidneys in normal and Hyp mice: evidence thatthe Hyp phenotype is unrelated to an intrinsic renal defect. J Clin

Invest 89: 1453–1459, 1992.296. NI B, DU Y, WU X, DEHOFF BS, ROSTECK PR, AND PAUL SM. Molecular

cloning, expression, and chromosomal localization of a humanbrain-specific Na-dependent inorganic phosphate cotransporter.J Neurochem 66: 2227–2238, 1996.

297. NI B, ROSTECK PR, NADI NS, AND PAUL SM. Cloning and expressionof a cDNA encoding a brain-specific Na-dependent inorganic phos-phate cotransporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 5607–5611, 1994.

298. NORONHA-BLOB L, LOWE V, AND SACKTOR B. Stimulation by thyroidhormone of phosphate transport in primary cultured renal cells.J Cell Physiol 137: 95–101, 1988.

299. NORONHA-BLOB L AND SACKTOR B. Inhibition by glucocorticoids ofphosphate transport in primary cultured renal cells. J Biol Chem

265: 2164–2169, 1986.300. OBERBAUER R, SCHREINER GF, BIBER J, MURER H, AND MEYER TW. In

vivo suppression of the renal Na/Pi cotransporter by antisenseoligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 4903–4906, 1996.

301. OBERLEITHNER H, LANG F, GREGER R, AND SPORER H. Influence ofcalcium and ionophore 23187 on tubular phosphate reabsorption.Pflugers Arch 379: 37–41, 1979.

302. OLAH Z, LEHEL C, ANDERSON WB, EIDEN MV, AND WILSON CA. Thecellular receptor for gibbon ape leukemia virus is a novel high

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1405

Page 34: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

affinity sodium-dependent phosphate transporter. J Biol Chem 269:25426–25431, 1994.

303. PALMER G, BONJOUL J-P, AND CAVERZASIO J. Expression of a newlyidentified phosphate transporter/retrovirus receptor in humanSaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells and its regulation by insulin-likegrowth factor I. Endocrinology 138: 5202–5209, 1997.

304. PAPAKONSTANTI EA, EMMANOUEL DS, GRAVANIS A, AND STOURNARAS C.Na/Pi cotransport alters rapidly cytoskeletal protein polymerizationdynamics in oppossum kidney cells. Biochem J 315: 241–247, 1996.

305. PAQUIN J, VINCENT E, DUGRE A, XIAO YS, BOYER CJC, AND BELIVEAU R.Membrane topography of the renal phosphate carrier NaPi-2: lim-ited proteolysis studies. Biochim Biophys Acta 1431: 315–328,1999.

306. PARAISO MS, MCATEER JA, AND KEMPSON SA. Parathyroid hormoneinhibits plasma membrane Pi transport without changing endocyticactivity in opossum kidney cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1266:143–147, 1995.

307. PFISTER MF, BRUNSKILL NJ, FORGO J, STANGE G, BIBER J, AND MURER

H. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase reduces in OK cellsNa/Pi cotransport but does not interfere with its regulation by PTH.Pflugers Arch 438: 392–396, 1999.

308. PFISTER MF, FORGO J, ZIEGLER U, BIBER J, AND MURER H. cAMP-dependent and -independent downregulation of type II Na1/Pi co-transporters by PTH. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F720–F725,1999.

309. PFISTER MF, HILFIKER H, FORGO J, LEDERER E, BIBER J, AND MURER H.Cellular mechanisms involved in the acute adaptation of Na/Pi

cotransport to high or low-Pi medium in OK cells. Pflugers Arch

435: 713–719, 1998.310. PFISTER MF, LEDERER E, FORGO J, ZIEGLER U, LOTSCHER M, QUABIUS

ES, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormone-dependent degra-dation of type II Na/Pi cotransporters. J Biol Chem 272: 20125–20130, 1997.

311. PFISTER MF, RUF I, STANGE G, ZIEGLER U, LEDERER E, BIBER J, AND

MURER H. Lysosomal degradation of renal type II Na/Pi cotrans-porter, a novel principle in the regulation of membrane transport.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 45: 1909–1914, 1998.

312. PFLUGER AC, BERNDT TJ, AND KNOX FG. Effect of renal interstitialadenosine infusion on phosphate excretion in diabtes mellitus rats.Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 274: R1228–R1235, 1998.

313. PITTS TO, MCGOWAN JA, CHEN TC, SILVERMAN M, ROSE ME, AND

PUSCHETT JB. Inhibitory effects of volume expansion performed invivo on transport of the isolated rabbit proximal tubule perfused invitro. J Clin Invest 81: 997–1003, 1988.

314. PIZURKI L, RIZZOLI R, CAVERZASIO J, AND BONJOUR JP. Effect of trans-forming growth factor-a and parathyroid hormone-related proteinon phosphate transport in renal cells. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 259: F929–F935, 1990.315. PIZURKI L, RIZZOLI R, MOSELEY J, MARTIN TJ, CAVERZASIO J, AND BON-

JOUR J-P. Effect of synthetic tumoral PTH-related peptide on cAMPproduction and Na-dependent Pi transport. Am J Physiol Renal

Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 255: 5957–F961, 1988.316. PORTALE AA, HALLORAN BP, AND MORRIS RC JR. Dietary intake of

phosphorus modulates the circadian rhythm in serum concentra-tion of phosphorus. J Clin Invest 80: 1147–1154, 1987.

317. POUJEOL P, CHABARDES D, ROINEL M, AND DE ROUFFIGNAC C. Influenceof extracellular fluid volume expansion on magnesium calcium andphosphate handling along the rat nephron. Pflugers Arch 365: 203–211, 1976.

318. POUJEOL P, CORMAN B, TOUVAY C, AND DE ROUFFIGNAC C. Phosphatereabsorption in rat nephron terminal segments: intrarenal hetero-geneity and strain differences. Pflugers Arch 371: 39–44, 1977.

319. POUJEOL P AND VANDEWALLE A. Phosphate uptake by proximal cellsisolated from rabbit kidney: role of dexamethasone. Am J Physiol

Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 249: F74–F83, 1985.320. PRABHU S, LEVI M, DWARAKANATH V, ARAR M, BIBER J, MURER H, AND

BAUM M. Effect of glucocorticoids on neonatal rabbit renal corticalsodium-inorganic phosphate messenger RNA and protein abun-dance. Pediatr Res 41: 20–24, 1997.

321. PRATT RD AND PEDERSEN PL. Inhibition of Na-dependent phosphatetransport by group-specific covalent reagents in rat kidney brush-border membrane vesicles. Evidence for the involvement of ty-

rosine and sulfhydryl groups on the interior of the membrane. Arch

Biochem Biophys 68: 9–19, 1989.323. PUSCHETT JB, AGUS ZS, SENESKY D, AND GOLDBERG M. Effects of

saline loading and aortic obstruction on proximal phosphate trans-port. Am J Physiol 223: 851–857, 1972.

324. PUSCHETT JB, LIPUT J, AND GALYA C. Brush-border membrane phos-phate transport: effects of volume expansion. Adv Exp Med Biol

208: 109–113, 1986.325. QUABIUS ES, MURER H, AND BIBER J. Expression of a renal Na/Pi

cotransporter (NaPi-1) in MDCK and LLC-PK1 cells. Pflugers Arch

430: 132–136, 1995.326. QUABIUS ES, MURER H, AND BIBER J. Expression of proximal tubular

Na-Pi and Na-SO4 cotransporters in MDCK and LLC-PK1 cells bytransfection. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 270:F220–F228, 1996.

327. QUAMME GA. Phosphate transport in intestinal brush-border mem-brane vesicles: effect of pH and dietary phosphate. Am J Physiol

Gastrointest Liver Physiol 249: G168–G176, 1985.328. QUAMME GA. Effect of pH on Na-dependent phosphate transport in

renal outer cortical and outer medullary BBMV. Am J Physiol

Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 258: F1–F8, 1990.329. QUAMME GA, BIBER JA, AND MURER H. Sodium-phosphate cotrans-

port in OK cells: inhibition by PTH and “adaptation” to low phos-phate. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 257: F967–F973, 1989.

330. QUAMME GA, PELECH S, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Abnormalities ofparathyroid hormone-mediated signal transduction mechanisms inopossum kidney cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1223: 107–116, 1994.

331. QUAMME GA, PFEILSCHIFTER J, AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormoneinhibition of Na1/phosphate cotransport in OK cells: generation ofsecond messengers in the regulatory cascade. Biochem Biophys

Res Commun 158: 951–957, 1989.332. QUAMME GA, PFEILSCHIFTER J, AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormone

inhibition of Na1/phosphate cotransport in OK cells: intracellular[Ca21] as a second messenger. Biochim Biophys Acta 1013: 166–172, 1989.

333. QUAMME GS, PFEILSCHIFTER J, AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormoneinhibition of Na1/phosphate cotransport in OK cells: requirementof protein kinase C-dependent pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta

1013: 159–165, 1989.334. QUAMME GA AND WONG NLM. Phosphate transport in the proximal

convoluted tubule: effect of intraluminal pH. Am J Physiol Renal

Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 246: F323–F333, 1994.335. QUIGLEY R AND BAUM M. Effects of growth hormone and insulin-like

growth factor 1 on rabbit proximal convoluted tubule transport.J Clin Invest 88: 368–374, 1991.

336. QUIGLEY R AND BAUM M. Effects of epidermal growth factor andtransforming growth factor-a on rabbit proximal tubule solutetransport. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 266: F459–F465, 1994.

337. QUIGLEY R, KENNERLY DA, SHEY JN, AND BAUM M. Stimulation ofproximal convoluted tubule phosphate transport by epidermalgrowth factor: signal transduction. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Elec-

trolyte Physiol 269: F339–F344, 1995.338. RASMUSSEN H AND TENENHOUSE HS. Mendelian hypophosphatemias.

In: The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, editedby Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, and Valle D. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1995, p. 3717–3745.

339. RESHKIN SJ, FORGO J, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Functional asymmetryof phosphate transport and its regulation in opossum kidney cells:phosphate adaptation. Pflugers Arch 419: 256–262, 1991.

340. RESHKIN SJ, FORGO J, AND MURER H. Functional asymmetry of phos-phate transport and its regulation in OK cells: phosphate transport.Pflugers Arch 416: 554–560, 1990.

341. RESHKIN SJ, FORG J, AND MURER H. Functional asymmetry in phos-phate transport and its regulation in OK cells: parathyroid hormoneinhibition. Pflugers Arch 416: 624–631, 1990.

342. RESHKIN SJ, FORGO J, AND MURER H. Apical and basolateral effects ofPTH in OK cells: transport inhibition, messenger production, ef-fects of pertussis toxin and interaction with a PTH-analog. J Membr

Biol 124: 227–237, 1991.343. RESHKIN SJ AND MURER H. Involvement of C3 exotoxin-sensitive G

1406 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 35: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

proteins (rho/rac) in PTH signal transduction in OK cells. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 262: F572–F577, 1992.344. RESHKIN SJ AND MURER H. Parathyrod hormone regulation in OK

cells: in situ protein phosphorylation reactions involving PKA, PKCand GTP-binding proteins. Cell Physiol Biochem 1: 143–159, 1991.

345. RESHKIN SJ, WUARIN F, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Parathyroid hormoneinduced alterations of protein content and phosphorylation in en-riched membranes of opossum kidney cells. J Biol Chem 265:15261–15266, 1990.

346. RIBEIRO CP AND MANDEL LJ. Parathyroid hormone inhibits proximaltubule Na-K-ATPase activity. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte

Physiol 262: F209–F216, 1992.347. RICCARDI D, HALL AE, CHATTOPADHYAY N, XU JZ, BROWN EM, AND

HEBERT SC. Localization of the extracellular Ca21/polyvalent cat-ion-sensing protein in rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274:F611–F622, 1998.

348. RITTHALER T, TRAEBERT M, LOTSCHER M, BIBER J, MURER H, AND

KAISSLING B. Effects of phosphate intake on distribution of type IINa1/Pi cotransporter mRNA in rat kidney. Kidney Int 55: 976–983,1999.

349. RIZZOLI R, RIZURKI L, AND BONJOUR JP. Tumoral parathyroid hor-mone-related protein: a new hormone affecting calcium and phos-phate transport. News Physiol Sci 15: 195–198, 1989.

350. ROGERS SA AND HAMMERMAN MR. Growth hormone activates phos-pholipase C in proximal tubular basolateral membranes from ca-nine kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 6363–6366, 1989.

351. ROUSE D AND SUKI WN. Modulation of phosphate absorption bycalcium in the rabbit proximal convoluted tubule. J Clin Invest 76:630–636, 1985.

352. SACKTOR B AND CHENG L. Sodium gradient-dependent phosphatetransport in renal brush-border membrane vesicles: effect of anintravesicular greater than extravesicular proton gradient. J Biol

Chem 256: 8080–8084, 1981.353. SAXENA S AND ALLON M. The role of cytosolic calcium in chronic

adaptation to phosphate depletion in opossum kidney cells. J Biol

Chem 271: 3902–3906, 1996.354. SAXENA S, DANSBY L, AND ALLON M. Adaptation to phosphate deple-

tion in opossum kidney cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 216:141–147, 1995.

355. SCHWAB SJ AND HAMMERMAN MR. Electrogenic Na-independent Pi

transport in canine renal basolateral membrane vesicles. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 250: F419–F424, 1986.356. SCHWAB SJ, KLAHR S, AND HAMMERMAN MR. Na-gradient dependent Pi

uptake in basolateral membrane vesicles from dog kidney. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 246: F663–F669, 1984.357. SEGAL JH AND POLLOCK AS. Transfection-mediated expression of a

dominant cAMP-resistant phenotype in the opossum kidney (OK)cell line prevents parathyroid hormone-induced inhibition of Na-phosphate cotransport. J Clin Invest 86: 1442–1450, 1990.

358. SEIFERT SA, HSIAO SC, MURER H, BIBER J, AND KEMPSON SA. Renalendosomal phosphate (Pi) transport in normal and diabetic ratsand response to chronic Pi deprivation. Cell Biochem Funct 15:9–14, 1997.

359. SHACHAF C, SKORECKI KL, AND TZUKERMAN M. The role of AP2 con-sensus sites in the regulation of the rat Npt2 (sodium-phosphatecotransporter) promoter. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F406–F416, 2000.

360. SHAH SV, KEMPSON SA, NORTHRUP TE, AND DOUSA TP. Renal adapta-tion to a low phosphate diet in rats. Blockade by actinomycin D.

J Clin Invest 64: 955–966, 1979.361. SIEGFRIED G, VRTOVSNIK F, PRIE D, AMIEL C, AND FRIEDLANDER G.

Parathyroid hormone stimulates ecto-59-nucleotidase activity inrenal epithelial cells: role of protein kinase C. Endocrinology 136:1267–1275, 1995.

362. SILVERSTEIN DM. Expression of the PiT transporter in the kidney(Abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 8: A2645, 1997.

363. SILVERSTEIN DM, BARAC-NIETO M, MURER H, AND SPITZER A. A putativegrowth-related Na-Pi cotransporter. Am J Physiol Regulatory In-

tegrative Comp Physiol 273: R928–R933, 1997.364. SILVERSTEIN DM, BARAC-NIETO M, AND SPITZER A. Mechanism of renal

phosphate retention during growth. Kidney Int 49: 1023–1026,1996.

365. SORRIBAS V, LOTSCHER M, LOFFING J, BIBER J, KAISLLING B, MURER H,

AND LEVI M. Cellular mechanisms of the age-related decrease inrenal phosphate reabsorption. Kidney Int 50: 855–863, 1996.

366. SORRIBAS V, MARKOVICH D, HAYES G, STANGE G, FORGO J, BIBER J, AND

MURER H. Cloning of a Na/Pi cotransporter from opossum kidneycells. J Biol Chem 269: 6615–6621, 1994.

367. SORRIBAS V, MARKOVICH D, VERRI T, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Thyroidhormone stimulation of Na/Pi cotransport in opossum kidney cells.Pflugers Arch 431: 266–271, 1995.

368. STAUB O, GAUTSCHI I, ISHIKAWA T, BREITSCHOPF K, CIECHANOVER A,SCHILD L, AND ROTIN D. Regulation of stability and function of theepithelial Na1 channel (EnaC) by ubiquitination. EMBO J 16: 6325–6336, 1997.

369. STAUB O AND ROTIN D. Regulation of ion transport by protein-proteininteraction domains. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 6: 447–454,1997.

370. STOLL R, KINNE R, AND MURER H. Effect of dietary phosphate intakeon phosphate transport by isolated rat renal brush-border vesicles.Biochem J 180: 465–470, 1979.

371. STOLL R, KINNE R, MURER H, FLEISCH H, AND BONJOUR J-P. Phosphatetransport by rat renal brush-border membrane vesicles: influenceof dietary phosphate, thyro-parathyroidectomy, and 1,25-dihy-droxyvitamin D3. Pflugers Arch 380: 47–52, 1979.

372. STOLL R, MURER H, FLEISCH H, AND BONJOUR J-P. Effect of diphos-phonate treatment on phosphate transport by renal brush bordervesicles. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 239: F13–F16, 1980.

373. STROM TM, FRANCIS F, LORENZ B, BOEDDRICH A, ECONS M, LEHRACH H,AND MEITINGER T. Pex gene deletions in Gy and Hyp mice providemouse models for X-linked hypophosphatemia. Hum Mol Genet 6:165–171, 1997.

374. SUKI WN AND ROUSE D. Renal transport of calcium, magnesium, andphosphate. In: Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney (5th ed.), editedby Brenner BM. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1996, p. 472–515.

375. SZCZEPANSKA-KONKEL M, YUSUFI AN, VANSCOY M, WEBSTER SK, AND

DOUSA TP. Phosphonocarboxylic acids as specific inhibitors ofNa1-dependent transport of phosphate across renal brush-bordermembrane. J Biol Chem 261: 6375–6383, 1986.

376. TAKAHASHI F, MORITA K, KATAI K, SEGAWA H, FUJIOKA A, KOUDA T,TATSUMI S, NII T, TAKETANI Y, HAGA H, HISANO S, FUKUI Y, MIYAMOTO

K, AND TAKEDA E. Effects of dietary inorganic phosphate on therenal Na1-dependent inorganic-phosphate transporter NaPi-2 inthyroparathyroidectomized rats. Biochem J 333: 175–181, 1998.

377. TAKEDA E, TAKETANI Y, MORITA K, AND MIYAMOTO K. Sodium-depen-dent phosphate cotransporters. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 31: 377–381, 1999.

378. TAKETANI Y, MIYAMOTO K, CHIKAMORI M, TANAKA K, YAMAMOTO H,TATSUME S, MORITA K, AND TAKEDA E. Characterization of the 59-flanking region of the human NPT-1 Na1/phosphate cotransportergene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1396: 267–272, 1998.

379. TAKETANI Y, MIYAMOTO KI, KATAI K, CHIKAMORI M, TATSUMI S, SEGAWA

H, YAMAMOTO H, MORITA K, AND TAKEDA E. Gene structure andfunctional analysis of the human Na/phosphate cotransporter. Bio-

chem J 324: 927–934, 1997.380. TAKETANI Y, SEGAWA H, CHIKAMORI M, MORITA K, TANAKA K, KIDO S,

YAMAMOTO H, IEMORI Y, TATSUMI S, TSUGAWA N, OKANO T, KOBAYASHI

T, MIYAMOTO K, AND TAKEDA E. Regulation of type II renal Na1-dependent inorganic phosphate transporters by 1,25-dihydroxyvi-tamin D-3: identification of a vitamin D-responsive element in thehuman NAPI-3 gene. J Biol Chem 273: 14575–14581, 1998.

381. TATSUMI S, MIYAMOTO K-I, KOUDA T, MOTONAGA K, KATAI K, OHKIDO I,MORITA K, SEGAWA H, TANI Y, YAMAMOTO H, TAKETANI Y, AND TAKEDA

E. Identification of three isoforms for the Na1-dependent phos-phate cotransporter (NaPi-2) in rat kidney. J Biol Chem 273:28568–28575, 1998.

382. TATSUMI S, SEGAWA H, MORITA K, HAGA H, KOUDA T, YAMAMOTO H,INOUE Y, NII T, KATAI K, TAKETANI Y, MIYAMOTO KI, AND TAKEDA E.Molecular cloning and hormonal regulation of PiT-1, a sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter from rat parathyroid glands.Endocrinology 139: 1692–1699, 1998.

383. TAUFIQ S, COLLINS JF, AND GISHAN FK. Posttranscriptional mecha-nisms regulate ontogenic changes in rat renal sodium-phosphatetransporter. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol

272: R134–R141, 1997.

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1407

Page 36: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

384. TENENHOUSE HS. X-linked hypophosphatemia-A homologous disor-der in humans and mice. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 14: 333–341,1999.

385. TENENHOUSE HS AND BECK L. Renal Na-phosphate cotransportergene expression in X-linked Hyp and Gy mice. Kidney Int 49:1027–1032, 1996.

386. TENENHOUSE HS, GAUTHIER C, MARTEL J, GESEK FA, COUTERMARSH BA,AND FRIEDMAN PA. Na1-phosphate cotransport in mouse distal con-voluted tubule cells: evidence for Glvr-1 and Ram-1 gene expres-sion. J Bone Miner Res 13: 590–597, 1998.

387. TENENHOUSE HS, MARTEL J, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Effect of Pi

restriction on renal Na1 -Pi cotransporter mRNA and immunoreac-tive protein in X-linked Hyp mice. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 268: F1062–F1069, 1995.388. TENENHOUSE HS, ROY S, MARTEL J, AND GAUTHIER C. Differential

expression, abundance and regulation of Na-phosphate cotrans-porter genes in murine kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275:F527–F534, 1998.

389. TENENHOUSE HS, WERNER A, BIBER J, MA S, MARTEL J, ROY S, AND

MURER H. Renal Na phosphate cotransport in murine X-linkedhypophosphatemic rickets, molecular characterization. J Clin In-

vest 93: 671–676, 1994.390. THAKKER RV. Molecular genetics of mineral metabolic disorders.

J Inherit Metab Dis 15: 592–609, 1992.391. THAKKER RV. The role of renal chloride channel mutations in kidney

stone disease and nephrocalcinosis. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens

7: 385–388, 1998.392. THIERRY J, POUJEOL P, AND RIPOCHE P. Interactions between Na1-

dependent uptake of D-glucose, phosphate and L-alanine in rat renalbrush-border membrane vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta 647: 203–210, 1981.

393. THORNTON LR, MEYER MH, AND MEYER RA. Isoproterenol increasesrenal tubular reabsorption of phosphate in X-linked hypophos-phatemic (Hyp) mice. Miner Electrolyte Metab 25: 204–209, 1999.

394. TIEDER M, MODAI D, SAMUEL R, ARIE R, HALABE A, BAB I, GABIZON D,AND LIBERMAN UA. Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hy-percalciuria. N Engl J Med 312: 611–617, 1985.

395. TIMMER RT AND GUNN RB. Phosphate transport by the human renalcotransporter NaPi-3 expressed in HEK-293 cells. Am J Physiol

Cell Physiol 274: C757–C769, 1998.396. TRAEBERT M, HATTENHAUER O, MURER H, KAISSLING B, AND BIBER J.

Expression and localization of a type II sodium-phosphate cotrans-porter in murine type II alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung

Cell Mol Physiol 277: L868–L873, 1999.397. TRAEBERT M, LOTSCHER M, ASCHWANDEN R, RITTHALER TH, BIBER J,

MURER H, AND KAISSLING B. Distribution of the sodium-phosphatetransporter (NaPi-2) during the postnatal ontogeny of the rat kid-ney. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1407–1415, 1999.

398. TRAEBERT M, ROTH J, BIBER J, MURER H, AND KAISSLING B. Internal-ization of proximal tubular type II Na/Pi cotransporter by parathy-roid hormone: an immunogold electronmicroscopy study. Am J

Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F148–F154, 2000.399. TRAEBERT M, VOLKL H, BIBER J, MURER H, AND KAISSLING B. 1–34 and

3–34 parathyroid hormone peptides downregulate proximal tubulartype IIa Na/Pi cotransporters but have different luminal vs. con-traluminal actions. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F792–F798,2000.

400. TURNER ST AND DOUSA TP. Phosphate transport by brush-bordermembranes from superficial and juxtamedullary cortex. Kidney Int

27: 879–885, 1985.401. TURNER ST, KIEBZAK GM, AND DOUSA TP. Mechanism of glucocorti-

coid effect on renal transport of phosphate. Am J Physiol Cell

Physiol 243: C227–C236, 1982.402. ULLRICH KJ, RUMRICH G, AND KLOESS S. Phosphate transport in the

proximal convolution of the rat kidney. III. Effect of extracellularand intracellular pH. Pflugers Arch 77: 33–42, 1978.

403. UMEMURA S, MARVER D, SMYTH DD, AND JEFFRIES WB. a2-Adrenocep-tors and cellular cAMP levels in single nephron segments from therat. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 249: F28–F33,1985.

404. VANSCOY M, LOGHMAN-ADHAM M, ONSGARD M, SZCZEPANSKA-KONKEL M,HOMMA S, KNOX FG, AND DOUSA TP. Mechanism of phosphaturia

elicited by administration of phosphonoformate in vivo. Am J

Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 255: F984–F994, 1988.405. VERRI T, MARKOVICH D, PEREGO C, NORBIS F, STANGE G, SORRIBAS V,

BIBER J, AND MURER H. Cloning of a rabbit renal Na/Pi cotransporterwhich is regulated by dietary phosphate. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 268: F626–F633, 1995.406. VRTOVSNIK F, EL YANDOUZI EH, LE GRIMELLEC C, AND FRIEDLANDER G.

Sphingomyelin and cholesterol modulate sodium coupled uptakesin proximal tubular cells. Kidney Int 41: 983–991, 1992.

407. WAGNER CA, RABER G, WALDEGGER S, OSSWALD H, BIBER J, MURER H,BUSCH AE, AND LANG F. Regulation of the human brush borderNa1/phosphate cotransporter (NaPi-3) expressed in Xenopus oo-cytes by intracellular calcium and protein kinase C. Cell Physiol

Biochem 6: 105–111, 1996.408. WAGNER CA, WALDEGGER S, OSSWALD H, BIBER J, MURER H, BUSCH AE,

AND LANG F. Heavy metals inhibit Pi-induced currents throughhuman brush border NaPi-3 cotransporter in Xenopus oocytes.Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 271: F926–F930,1996.

409. WAGNER GF, VOZZOLO BL, JAWORSKI E, HADDAD M, KLINE RL, OLSEN

HS, ROSEN CA, DAVIDSON MB, AND RENFRO JL. Human stanniocalcininhibits renal phosphate exretion in the rat. J Bone Miner Res 12:165–171, 1997.

410. WALKER JJ, YAN TS, AND QUAMME GA. Presence of multiple sodium-dependent phosphate transport processes in proximal brush-bor-der membranes. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 252:F226–F231, 1987.

411. WEBSTER SK, HARAMATI A, AND KNOX FG. Effect of dexamethasoneon segmental phosphate reabsorption in phosphate deprived rats.Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 251: F576–F580,1986.

412. WEINMANN EJ, STEPLOCK D, TATE K, HALL RA, SPURNEY RF, AND

SHENOLIKAR S. Structure-function of recombinant Na/H-exchangerregulatory factor (NHE-RF). J Clin Invest 101: 2199–2206, 1998.

413. WEINMAN EJ, STEPLOCK D, WANG Y, AND SHENOLIKAR S. Characteriza-tion of a protein cofactor that mediates protein kinase A regulationof the renal brush-border membrane Na-H exchanger. J Clin Invest

95: 2143–2149, 1995.414. WERNER A, DEHMELT L, AND NALBANT P. Na-dependent phosphate

cotransporters: the NaPi protein families. J Exp Biol 201: 3135–3142, 1998.

415. WERNER A, KEMPSON SA, BIBER J, AND MURER H. Increase of Na/Pi

cotransport encoding mRNA in response to low Pi diet in rat kidneycortex. J Biol Chem 269: 6637–6639, 1994.

416. WERNER A, MOORE ML, MANTEI N, BIBER J, SEMENZA G, AND MURER H.Cloning and expression of cDNA for a Na/Pi cotransport system ofkidney cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 9608–9612, 1991.

417. WERNER A, MURER H, AND KINNE RK. Cloning and expression of arenal Na/Pi cotransport system from flounder. Am J Physiol Renal

Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 267: F311–F317, 1994.418. WHITE KE, BIBER J, MURER H, AND ECONS MJ. A PDZ domain-

containing protein with homology to Diphor-1 maps to humanchromosome 1q21. Ann Hum Genet 62: 287–290, 1998.

418a.WHITE KE, BIBER J, MURER H, AND ECONS MJ. Chromosomal local-ization of two human genes involved in phosphate homeostasis: thetype IIb sodium-phosphate cotransporter and stanniocalcin. Som

Cell Mol Gen. In press.419. WINAVER J, BURNETT JC, TYCE GM, AND DOUSA TP. ANF inhibits

Na1-H1 antiport in proximal tubular BBM: role of dopamine. Kid-

ney Int 38: 1133–1140, 1991.420. WONG CK, HO MA, AND WAGNER GF. The co-localization of stannio-

calcin protein, mRNA and kidney cell markers in the rat kidney. J

Endocrinol 158: 183–189, 1998.421. WONG NLM, QUAMME GA, DIRKS JH, AND SUTTON RAL. Effects of

phosphate and calcium infusion on renal phosphate transport inthe dog. Renal Physiol 8: 30–37, 1985.

422. WOODCOCK EA AND JOHNSTON CI. Selective inhibition by epinephrineof parathyroid hormone-stimulated adenylate cyclase in rat renalcortex. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 242: F721–F726, 1982.

423. WOODCOCK EA AND JOHNSTON CI. Renal proximal tubular a-adrener-gic receptors oppose urinary 39,59-cyclic adenosine monophos-

1408 MURER, HERNANDO, FORSTER, AND BIBER Volume 80

Page 37: Proximal Tubular Phosphate Reabsorption: Molecular Mechanisms

phate response to parathyroid hormone in vivo. Endocrinology

116: 1085–1089, 1985.424. WUARIN F, WU K, MURER H, AND BIBER J. The Na/Pi cotransporter of

OK cells: reaction and tentative identification with N-acetylimida-zole. Biochim Biophys Acta 981: 185–192, 1989.

425. XIAO YS, BOYER CJC, VINCENT E, DUGRE A, VACHON V, POTIER M, AND

BELIVEAU R. Involvement of disulphide bonds in the renal sodium/phosphate cotransporter NaPi-2. Biochem J 323: 401–408, 1997.

426. YABUUCHI H, TAMAI I, MORITA K, KOUDA T, MIYAMOTO K, TAKEDA E, AND

TSUJI A. Hepatic sinusoidal membrane transport of anionic drugsmediated by anion transporter Npt 1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286:1391–1396, 1998.

427. YANAGAWA N, NAGAMI GT, JO O, UEMASU J, AND KUROKAWA K. Disso-ciation of gluoconeogenesis from fluid and phosphate reabsorptionin isolated rabbit proximal tubules. Kidney Int 25: 869–873, 1984.

428. YUN CH, OH S, ZIZAK M, STEPLOCK D, TSAO S, TSE CM, WEINMAN EJ,AND DONOWITZ M. cAMP-mediated inhibition of the epithelial brushborder Na/H exchanger, NHE3, requires an associated regulatoryprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 3010–3015, 1997.

429. YUSUFI AN, BERNDT TJ, MOLTAJI H, DONOVAN B, DOUSA TP, AND KNOX

FG. Rat atrial natriuretic factor inhibits phosphate transport inbrush-border membrane from superficial and juxtamedullary cor-tex. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 190: 87–90, 1989.

430. YUSUFI AN, BERNDT TJ, MURAYAMA N, KNOX FG, AND DOUSA TP.Calcitonin inhibits Na1 gradient-dependent phosphate uptakeacross renal brush-border membrane. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 252: F598–F604, 1987.

431. YUSUFI AN, MOLTAJI H, AND DOUSA TP. Dexamethasone blocks adap-tive increase of Na1-Pi cotransport in renal brush-border mem-brane elicited by thyroid hormone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun

161: 1160–1165, 1989.432. YUSUFI AN, MURAYAMA N, GAPSTUR SM, SZCZEPANSKA-KONKEL M, AND

DOUSA TP. Differential properties of brush-border membrane vesi-cles from early and late proximal tubules of rat kidney. Biochim

Biophys Acta 1191: 117–132, 1994.433. YUSUFI AN, MURAYAMA N, KELLER MJ, AND DOUSA TP. Modulatory

effect of thyroid hormones on uptake of phosphate and othersolutes across luminal brush-border membrane of kidney cortex.Endocrinology 116: 2438–2449, 1985.

434. YUSUFI AN, SZCZEPANSKA-KONKEL M, HOPPE A, AND DOUSA TP. Differ-ent mechanisms of adaptive increase in Na1/Pi cotransport acrossthe renal brush-border membrane. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Elec-

trolyte Physiol 256: F852–F861, 1989.435. ZAJICEK H, WANG H, KUMAR V, WILSON P, AND LEVI M. Role of

sphingolipids in the regulation of renal phosphate transport. Kid-

ney Int 52 Suppl: S32–S35, 1997.436. ZALUPS RK AND KNOX FG. Calcitonin decreases the renal tubular

capacity for phosphate reabsorption. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid

Electrolyte Physiol 245: F345–F348, 1983.437. ZAMPIGHI GA, DREMAN M, BOORER KJ, LOO DD, BEZANILLA F, CHANDY

G, HALL JE, ZHANG XX, TENENHOUSE HS, HEWSON AS, MURER H, AND

EYDOUX P. Assignment of renal-specific Na1-phosphate cotrans-porter gene SLC17A2 to mouse chromosome band 13B by in situhybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 77: 304–305, 1997.

October 2000 PROXIMAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE REABSORPTION 1409