Prototyping Fostering Partnerships for Innovation · PDF file ·...
Transcript of Prototyping Fostering Partnerships for Innovation · PDF file ·...
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-1
Prototyping – Fostering Partnerships for Innovation
Dr. Chuck Perkins
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Emerging Capability & Prototyping)
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-2
Emerging Capability & Prototyping (EC&P)
Mission: identify, develop and demonstrate multi-
domain concepts and technologies to satisfy DoD,
Multi-service and CCMD priorities.
Accomplished through:
- Experimentation
- Prototyping
- Test & Evaluation
- Demonstration
Services’ Programs of RecordTransition
Incubator for war-winning capabilities
enabled by cutting-edge technologies
Technologies
(Push)Industry
Labs
DARPA
FFRDC
Services
IC
Capabilities
(Needs Pull)CCMDs
JS
Services
IC
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-3
EC&P’s Critical Network of Partners
Nominal Process
Concept
Nomination
Project
Transition
Project
Execution
Project
Selection
Co-Sponsors
Partners
Co-Sponsors
Partners
Customers
Co-Sponsors
SMEs
Partners
Customers
Needs pull
- CCMDs
- JS
- IC
- Services
TECH push
- Industry
- Labs
- DARPA
- FFRDC
- Non-traditional
- Services
- IC
Art of the Possible
Successful
program
execution
Problem set
awareness
EC&P
EC&P links
capabilities of
three critical
partner networks
Heilmeier Criteria
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-4
Emerging Capability & Prototyping
• Identifies, develops, and demonstrates multi-domain
technologies and concepts to satisfy DoD, Multi-Service, and
CCMD priorities
• Operationalizes leading edge technologies and leverages the
entire R&E enterprise for sources of innovation
• Partners with joint, interagency and international players
• Incentivizes innovation through prototyping and
experimentation
• Broadens the supplier base to include non-traditional
domestic & international performers
• Program elements (JCTD, ECTD, QRSP, FCT and RIF) are
congressionally supported
• With CIO, shapes investment of Spectrum Relocation Funds
“Seams, cracks and fissures”
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-5
Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)
Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)• Foster innovation, contribute to accelerated acquisition and weapon system affordability while
providing the Joint Forces with a decisive technical advantage
• Fieldable Prototypes/Demonstrations; < 48 months, < $100M
• POC: Mr. Elmer Roman
Anti-jam Precision
Guided Munition
(AJPGM)
Autonomous Mobility Applique
System (AMAS)
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
Link 16 Jammer
GPS Jammer
Execute prototypes and experiments to address DoD strategic needs,
fill operational gaps and reduce technical risk
Joint Multi-platform
Advanced Combat ID
(JMAC)
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-6
Joint Multi-platform Advanced Combat ID (JMAC)
JMAC will provide government-owned software that can be integrated into any sensor or Command and Control (C2) system to provide real-time identification of air threats, including Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), cruise missiles, rotary wing, military jets, and general aviation.
Partners: NORAD-USNORTHCOM, DHS, MIT-LL, U.S. Army AMRDEC, U.S. Army CMDS, SMDC, AFRL, JIAMDO
Outcome: • JMAC will be integrated into the NCR-Integrated Air
Defense System (NCR-IADS) Program Office
• Upgrades to the Improved-Sentinel radar, Enhanced Regional Situational Awareness (ERSA), and the Joint Air Defense Operations Center (JADOC) will occur in 2017
• JMAC will substantially improve the identification of non-cooperative targets much earlier in the kill-chain, which will increase decision space for senior leaders and increase available engagement distance between threats and defensed assets/critical infrastructure
Sentinel radar
ERSA at the NCR
Threat set
Enhanced combat ID for faster response time in NCR-IADS
FY14
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-7
Emerging Capabilities Technology Development (ECTD)
Explore art of the possible
Emerging Capabilities Technology Development (ECTD)• Pursue risk-reducing technology prototypes and demonstrations of cutting edge land, sea,
air and space systems for the joint Warfighter
• Proof-of-Principle prototypes; < 36 months, < $6M
• POC: Mr. Jon Lazar
Infrared Motion Detection
(IrMD) Using Existing
EO/IR Assets
Long Range
Engagement Weapon
(LREW)
Remote Weapon System
Auto Prioritization, Targeting,
and Operator Cueing
(RAPTOR)
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-8
Remote Weapon System Auto Prioritization, Targeting, and Operator Cueing (RAPTOR)
Provided the ability to quickly respond to hostile fire
– Combines automated target detection, tracking, and target prioritization to que
targets and prompt warfighter response
– Tracks multiple threats to reduce engagement time for subsequent targets
Transitions to the Joint Advanced Weapon Sensor System
(JAWSS)
Partners
– Army Armament Research, Development, and Engineering Center (ARDEC)
– Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Dahlgren
– Office of Naval Research
– Space and Naval Warfare Command
– United States Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory (MCWL)
– Penn State University
– York University
– University of Manitoba
– Southwest Research Institute
– Other industry partners
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-9
Quick Reaction Special Projects (QRSP)
Quick Reaction Special Projects (QRSP)• Mature emerging technologies for operational use by the joint Warfighter
• QRF – Conventional warfare needs focusing on A2/AD; < 12 months, < $3M
• RRF – Irregular warfare needs with global focus; < 18 months, < $1M
• POC: Mr. Jon Lazar
Bloom
Aluminum-Seawater Fuel
Cell Start System
UAV Payload Dispenser
Offer rapid response to emerging capability shortfalls
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-10
UAV Payload Dispenser
Common Interfaces and Battle Management System (BMS) for
Small UAVs
– Combines common launch tube, Picatiny Rail, and GOTS Mini-Battle
Management System (BMS)
– Designed for a variety of weapon systems including Textron Fury, Raytheon
Pyros, and General Dynamics 81mm mortar weapons
Accurately deliver specialized payloads into remote or
otherwise difficult to reach environments
Partners
– Naval Innovative Science and Engineering
– Special Operations Command
– Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren
– Marine Corps
– Raytheon
– Textron
– ATK
– General Dynamics
Custom
Pylon
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-11
Foreign Comparative Test (FCT)
Foreign Comparative Test (FCT)• Evaluate foreign prototype technology to adapt / transition for DoD use
• Pre-EMD prototype and non-development item demonstrations; < 24 months, < $2.5M
• POC: Col Sean Bradley
Pilot Physiological
Monitoring and
Warning System
(Israel)
Secondary Propulsion
Thrusters
(Germany)
Authorized to leverage international allies’ and partners’ R&D investments
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
Pilot Oxygen/Blood Flow Sensors
New Pump Jet Technology
Soldier-Sniper Weapon
Observation
Reconnaissance Device
(Canada)
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-12
Secondary Propulsion Thrusters
Potential to Significantly Reduce Total Ownership Cost
New Pump Jet
Thruster Technology
Legacy Secondary
Propulsion System (SPS)
Offers variable speed control and directional thrust for greater
ship control
Provides life cycle cost savings through :• Reduced manning and maintenance requirements
• Elimination of support cost such as tug fees accrued during mooring evolutions
Benefits• Meet existing SPS requirements for emergency thrust
• Improved low speed maneuvering
• Improved surface turning radius
• Improved repair/replacement approach
• On demand thrust with no time delay
• No platform speed limitations
• Immediate response and control
Participants• Sponsors: NAVSEA SBIR Program and
Program Offices (SEA 073, PMS 450 & 397)
• Gov’t Contributors: SEA 05Z, SUBMEPP
• Industry: Schottel (Germany), Progeny (US),
GDEB
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-13
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF)
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) ~ $250M/year• Accelerate the fielding of innovative technologies into military systems pursuant to Small
Business Innovative Research projects, technologies developed by the DoD labs, and other
innovative technologies
• RIF Partners: Services, COMCOMS, Defense Agencies
• Award preference to small businesses: < 24 months, < $3M
• POC: Mrs. Ellen Purdy
Encapsulated Body
Armor
Long-Standoff Maritime
Sensor Network
TILE Satellite Electric
Propulsion System
Aid technology integrationExplore art of the possible
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-14
SILVERTIP: Sensor Network for Maritime Early Warning (NORTHCOM)
A Mobile Sensor System for the Detection and Tracking of
Surface, Subsurface, and Airborne Targets
Low-Cost, Unmanned, and Environmentally Friendly
Proven Performance in the Arctic
Multiple Transition Programs Being Explored
USAF (OTH-B), USN (ROTHR), DHS (CSS)
Final Transition Plan to be Formalized in Full Proposal
Partners
USNORTHCOM
SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific
Liquid Robotics, Inc. – Prime
The Boeing Company – Acoustic Processing
ArgonST – HF Radar Processing
Related Prior or Current Work:
SHARC as an Off-Board ASW Sensor (IR&D)
MAYFLOWER (IR&D)
Multiple-Vehicle Collaborative Autonomy (SBIR)
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-15
Characteristics of EC&P Projects
• Projects span all Joint Capability Areas
• Projects inform requirements development
• Most projects have co-sponsors
• Projects emphasize user involvement with
technology demonstration and experimentation
• Transition planning from the start
• Most projects provide residual capabilities
• Partnerships are critical to success
“Seams, cracks and fissures”
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-16
2018 Areas of Concentration
Asymmetric Force ApplicationThe use of nontraditional technologies, tactics, logistics enablers, and asymmetric
approaches (e.g. autonomous/intelligent systems, human-machine combat teaming, low
cost autonomous assets, and disaggregated weapons systems) to provide a clear military
advantage to our forces during maneuver and engagement operations.
Electromagnetic Spectrum Maneuver (EMSM) The use of capabilities and technologies to maneuver freely in the EMS for offensive and
defensive operations in multiple domains. Maneuverability requires gaining and
maintaining access to spectrum, denying and/or degrading spectrum to our adversaries,
and conducting EMS deception operations. Intelligent systems and novel computational
architectures and approaches will accelerate and automate time critical decision making to
enable optimized and resilient exploitation of the EMS.
ISR and Counter-ISRTechnologies to enhance the resiliency, reach, and flexibility of ISR systems through low-
cost manufacturing, attritable systems, autonomy, cooperation at scale, on-board
processing, and improved sensors.
Information Operations and Analytics (IO&A)Efficiently and accurately exploit information collection and analytics technologies for
seamless Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination (PED) of all-source data and
information as well as multi-domain Command and Control across Services, Combatant
Commands, and Partner Forces.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-18
Back-up chart
S&ET Conference
04/18/2017 Page-19
• What are you trying to do? Articulate your objectives using
absolutely no jargon.
• How is it done today, and what are the limits of current
practice?
• What is new in your approach and why do you think it will
be successful?
• Who cares? If you succeed, what difference will it make?
• What are the risks?
• How much will it cost?
• How long will it take?
• What are the mid-term and final “exams” to check for
success?
-- George H. Heilmeier, Director of DARPA (1975-1977)
Heilmeier Criteria
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release