Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values...

5
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following the 2013 AQ Review

Transcript of Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values...

Page 1: Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.

Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE

Panel Date: 20th February 2014

0481:Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following the 2013 AQ Review

Page 2: Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.

Why change?

There has been no change to the CSEP NExA AQ Table since 2012

These values were based on output from the 2010 AQ Review

The CSEP NExA AQ values are the basis of the transportation charges issued by the iGTs

Current values are, on a weighted basis, more than 7.6% higher than those produced following the 2013 AQ Review

Page 3: Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.

Options

A UNC Modification is the only route to updating the CSEP NExA AQ Table.

Page 4: Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.

Solution

Replace the current CSEP NExA AQ Table with the revised table

Revised table is produced annually as a result of iGT030Table has been produced on the same principles as that for

UNC 0328 and IGT040VAs a result no development is required

Page 5: Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February 2014 0481: Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.

Recommended Steps

The Proposer recommends that this modification should: (delete as appropriate)

Not be subject to self-governance because it will have a material impact on competition and affect iGTs’ revenue

Proceed to consultation because the methodology has been developed previously under iGT030 and modifications UNC0328 and IGT040V were implemented under the same rules for determining the new average AQ values