PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

17
Rochdale Holdings Pty Ltd A.B.N. 85 009 049 067 trading as: HERRING STORER ACOUSTICS Suite 34, 11 Preston Street, Como, W.A. 6152 P.O. Box 219, Como, W.A. 6952 Telephone: (08) 9367 6200 Facsimile: (08) 9474 2579 Email: [email protected] PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT LOTS 51 AND 52 TOODYAY ROAD, LOT 50 RESERVE ROAD, LOT 81 REEN ROAD AND LOT 99 THE SPRINGS ROAD GIDGEGANNUP NOISE ASSESSMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 OUR REFERENCE: 16859-1-13173

Transcript of PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Page 1: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Rochdale Holdings Pty Ltd A.B.N. 85 009 049 067 trading as:

HERRING STORER ACOUSTICS Suite 34, 11 Preston Street, Como, W.A. 6152 P.O. Box 219, Como, W.A. 6952 Telephone: (08) 9367 6200 Facsimile: (08) 9474 2579 Email: [email protected]

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

LOTS 51 AND 52 TOODYAY ROAD, LOT 50 RESERVE ROAD, LOT 81 REEN ROAD AND LOT 99 THE SPRINGS ROAD

GIDGEGANNUP

NOISE ASSESSMENT

SEPTEMBER 2013

OUR REFERENCE: 16859-1-13173

Page 2: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics

DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE

NOISE ASSESSMENT GIDGEGANNUP

Job No: 13173

Document Reference: 16859-1-13173

FOR

MPMWA

DOCUMENT INFORMATION Author: Tim Reynolds Checked By: Paul Daly Date of Issue : 4 September 2013

REVISION HISTORY Revision Description Date Author Checked

DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

Copy No. Version No. Destination Hard Copy Electronic Copy

1 1 MPMWA

Page 3: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. SUMMARY 1

3. ACOUSTIC CRITERIA 2 3.1 WAPC Planning Policy 2 3.2 Appropriate Criteria 4

4. MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS 4

5. METHODOLOGY 5

6. CALIBRATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS 5

7. PREDICTED FUTURE NOISE LEVELS 6

8. ASSESSMENT 6

APPENDICES A Development Plans B Noise Monitoring Results C Noise Contour Plot For Night Period D Package A “Quiet House” Design Requirements

Page 4: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 16859-1-13173 1

1. INTRODUCTION Herring Storer Acoustics was commissioned by MPMWA to carry out a road traffic noise assessment for the proposed residential development located at Lots 51 and 52 Toodyay Road, Lot 50 Reserve Road, Lot 81 Reen Road and Lot 99 The Springs Road, Gidgegannup. The purpose of this assessment was to assess noise received within the development from vehicles travelling along Toodyay Road and if exceedance with the stated criteria were determined, establish the required attenuation measures to control noise intrusion to acceptable levels. The traffic noise assessment has been carried out in accordance with the WAPC State Planning Policy 5.4 “Road and Rail Transportation Noise and Freight Consideration in Land Use Planning”. As part of the study, the following was carried out:

• Monitor existing noise received from vehicles travelling along Toodyay Road.

• For future traffic flows, determine noise that would be received at residences

within the development from vehicles travelling on Toodyay Road.

• Assess the predicted noise levels for compliance with the appropriate criteria.

• If exceedances are predicted, comment on possible noise amelioration options for compliance with the appropriate criteria.

For information, the development plan is attached in Appendix A.

2. SUMMARY Under the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) Planning Policy 5.4 “Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning” (SPP5.4), we believe that the appropriate criteria for assessment for this development are as listed below for “Noise Limits”. EXTERNAL

LAeq(Day) of 60 dB(A); and LAeq(Night) of 55 dB(A).

INTERNAL

LAeq(Day) of 40 dB(A) in living and work areas; and LAeq(Night) of 35 dB(A) in bedrooms.

Noise received at an outdoor area should also be reduced as far as practicable, with an aim of achieving an LAeq of 50 dB(A) during the night period. Noise received at the first row of residence located along Toodyay Road would, as shown by the noise contour plot attached as Figure C1 in Appendix C, comply with the Policies "Noise Limits", but would exceed the "Noise Target". Therefore, Package A "Quiet House" Design and notifications on titles are required. For information, Package A “Quiet House” requirements are attached in Appendix D.

Page 5: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 16859-1-13173 2

3. ACOUSTIC CRITERIA

3.1 WAPC PLANNING POLICY

The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) released on 22 September 2009 State Planning Policy 5.4 “Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations In Land Use Planning”. Section 5.3 – Noise Criteria, which outlines the acoustic criteria, states:

“5.3 - NOISE CRITERIA

Table 1 sets out the outdoor noise criteria that apply to proposals for new noise-sensitive development or new major roads and railways assessed under this policy.

These criteria do not apply to –

• proposals for redevelopment of existing major roads or railways, which

are dealt with by a separate approach as described in section 5.4.1; and • proposals for new freight handling facilities, for which a separate

approach is described in section 5.4.2.

The outdoor noise criteria set out in Table 1 apply to the emission of road and rail transport noise as received at a noise-sensitive land use. These noise levels apply at the following locations—

• for new road or rail infrastructure proposals, at 1 m from the most

exposed, habitable façade of the building receiving the noise, at ground floor level only; and

• for new noise-sensitive development proposals, at 1 m from the most exposed, habitable façade of the proposed building, at each floor level, and within at least one outdoor living area on each residential lot.

Further information is provided in the guidelines.

Table 1 - Outdoor Noise Criteria

Time of day Noise Target Noise Limit Day (6 am–10 pm) LAeq(Day) = 55 dB(A) LAeq(Day) = 60 dB(A)

Night (10 pm–6 am) LAeq(Night) = 50 dB(A) LAeq(Night) = 55 dB(A)

The 5 dB difference between the outdoor noise target and the outdoor noise limit, as prescribed in Table 1, represents an acceptable margin for compliance. In most situations in which either the noise-sensitive land use or the major road or railway already exists, it should be practicable to achieve outdoor noise levels within this acceptable margin. In relation to greenfield sites, however, there is an expectation that the design of the proposal will be consistent with the target ultimately being achieved. Because the range of noise amelioration measures available for implementation is dependent upon the type of proposal being considered, the application of the noise criteria will vary slightly for each different type. Policy interpretation of the criteria for each type of proposal is outlined in sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2.

The noise criteria were developed after consideration of road and rail transport noise criteria in Australia and overseas, and after a series of case studies to assess whether the levels were practicable. The noise criteria take into account

Page 6: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 16859-1-13173 3

the considerable body of research into the effects of noise on humans, particularly community annoyance, sleep disturbance, long-term effects on cardiovascular health, effects on children’s learning performance, and impacts on vulnerable groups such as children and the elderly. Reference is made to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for noise policies in their publications on community noise and the Night Noise Guidelines for Europe. See the policy guidelines for suggested further reading.

5.3.1 Interpretation and application for noise-sensitive development proposals

In the application of these outdoor noise criteria to new noise-sensitive developments, the objective of this policy is to achieve –

• acceptable indoor noise levels in noise-sensitive areas (for example,

bedrooms and living rooms of houses, and school classrooms); and • a reasonable degree of acoustic amenity in at least one outdoor living

area on each residential lot1.

If a noise-sensitive development takes place in an area where outdoor noise levels will meet the noise target, no further measures are required under this policy. In areas where the noise target is likely to be exceeded, but noise levels are likely to be within the 5dB margin, mitigation measures should be implemented by the developer with a view to achieving the target levels in a least one outdoor living area on each residential lot1. Where indoor spaces are planned to be facing any outdoor area in the margin, noise mitigation measures should be implemented to achieve acceptable indoor noise levels in those spaces. In this case, compliance with this policy can be achieved for residential buildings through implementation of the deemed-to-comply measures detailed in the guidelines. In areas where the outdoor noise limit is likely to be exceeded (i.e. above LAeq(Day) of 60 dB(A) or LAeq(Night) of 55 dB(A)), a detailed noise assessment in accordance with the guidelines should be undertaken by the developer. Customised noise mitigation measures should be implemented with a view to achieving the noise target in at least one outdoor living or recreation area on each noise-sensitive lot or, if this is not practicable, within the margin. Where indoor spaces will face outdoor areas that are above the noise limit, mitigation measures should be implemented to achieve acceptable indoor noise levels in those spaces, as specified in the following paragraphs.

For residential buildings, acceptable indoor noise levels are LAeq(Day) of 40 dB(A) in living and work areas and LAeq(Night) of 35 dB(A) in bedrooms2. For all other noise-sensitive buildings, acceptable indoor noise levels under this policy comprise noise levels that meet the recommended design sound levels in Table 1 of Australian Standard AS 2107:2000 Acoustics—Recommended design sound levels and reverberation times for building interiors.

These requirements also apply in the case of new noise-sensitive developments in the vicinity of a major transport corridor where there is no existing railway or

1 For non residential noise-sensitive developments, (e.g. schools and child care centres) consideration should be given to providing a suitable outdoor area that achieves the noise target, where this is appropriate to the type of use. 2 For residential buildings, indoor noise levels are not set for utility spaces such as bathrooms. This policy encourages effective “quiet house” design, which positions these non-sensitive spaces to shield the more sensitive spaces from transport noise (see guidelines for further information).

Page 7: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 16859-1-13173 4

major road (bearing in mind the policy’s 15-20 year planning horizon). In these instances, the developer should engage in dialogue with the relevant infrastructure provider to develop a noise management plan to ascertain individual responsibilities, cost sharing arrangements and construction time frame.

If the policy objectives for noise-sensitive developments are not achievable, best practicable measures should be implemented, having regard to section 5.8 and the guidelines.”

The Policy, under Section 5.7, also provides information regarding “Notifications on Titles”.

3.2 APPROPRIATE CRITERIA

Based on the above, the following criteria are proposed for this development:

External Day Maximum of 60 dB(A) LAeq Night Maximum of 55 dB(A) LAeq Outdoor Living Areas* Maximum of 50 dB(A) LAeq (night period)

Internal

Sleeping Areas 35 dB(A) LAeq(night) Living Areas 40 dB(A) LAeq(day)

*This is a suggested noise level; noise is to be reduced as far as practicably possible.

4. MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS To determine the existing acoustic environment at the proposed development, noise data loggers were deployed adjacent to Toodyay Road on Wednesday 21st August 2013. The automatic noise data logger records sound pressure levels in accordance with Australian Standard 2702-1984: Acoustics - Method For Measurement of Road Traffic Noise. The logger used records statistical noise level data, of which the LA1, LA10, LAeq and LA90 levels are reported. These are defined below:

LA1 The noise level exceeded for 1% of the time (in this instance, the noise level

exceeded for 36 seconds in each 1-hour period). LA10 The noise level exceeded for 10% of the time (in this instance, the noise level

exceeded for 6 minutes in each 1-hour period). LAeq The energy equivalent noise level for the 1-hour period. A single number

value that expresses the time-varying sound level for the 1-hour period as though it were a constant sound level with the same total sound energy as the time-varying level.

LA90 The noise level exceeded for 90% of the time (in this instance, the noise level

exceeded for 54 minutes in each 1-hour period).

Page 8: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 16859-1-13173 5

The logger was located as shown on the site plan attached in Appendix A. The results of the noise logging are summarised in Table 4.1. The results are also shown graphically on Figure B1, attached in Appendix B.

TABLE 4.1 - SUMMARY OF MEASURED NOISE LEVELS Parameter Measured Level dB(A)* Difference between

L10(18hour ) and LAeq(parameter) dB(A) LA10 (18 hour) 65.2 N/A

LAeq, day (6am to 10pm) 64.3 = LA10 (18 hour) + 0.9

LAeq, night (10pm to 6am) 60.3 = LA10(18 hour) – 4.9 * It is normal practice to quote decibels to the nearest whole number. Fractions are retained here to minimise any

cumulative rounding error.

5. METHODOLOGY Modelling of noise received within the subdivision from Toodyay Road was carried out using SoundPlan, using the Calculation of Road Traffic Noise (CoRTN) algorithms. The input data for the model included:

• Increased traffic volume, assuming 2% growth over 20 years. • Other traffic data as listed in Table 4.1. • A +2.5 dB adjustment to allow for façade reflection.

The traffic data currently available on the Main Roads web site are as listed in Table 5.1. Table 5.1 also lists the percentage heavy vehicles and the calculated future traffic flows (20 years from now).

TABLE 5.1 - SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC DATA Parameter Brockman Highway

Current Traffic Flow (vpd) 6033

Future Traffic Flow (vpd) 8965

Percentage Heavy Vehicles (%) 12.0 For the noise modeling for future traffic it has been assumed that the percentage of future heavy vehicles and road surfacing remains the same as for the current traffic flows. In this case, we believe that this is a conservative approach, as we believe that the percentage of heavy vehicles would fall over time.

6. CALIBRATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS

Based on the existing traffic volumes detailed in Section 5 and the current road alignment, the existing traffic noise levels have been calculated to verify the prediction model and calibrated to correlate with the monitored noise levels. Calculations are free field as the noise logger was located away from any building façades. The SoundPlan computer model was calibrated with the monitored data as listed in Table 4.1.

Page 9: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 16859-1-13173 6

7. PREDICTED FUTURE NOISE LEVELS

We note that for the Toodyay Road, as the difference between the LAeq,16hr and the LAeq,8hr being less than 5 dB(A), thus achieving compliance with the night period criteria will also result in achieving compliance with the day period criteria. Therefore, noise modelling was carried out for the night period only and the results are shown on Figure C1 in Appendix C.

8. ASSESSMENT

In accordance with the WAPC Planning Policy 5.4, an assessment of the noise that would be received within the development located at Lots 51 and 52 Toodyay Road, Lot 50 Reserve Road, Lot 81 Reen Road and Lot 99 The Springs Road, Gidgegannup, from vehicles travelling on Toodyay Road has been undertaken. In accordance with the Policy, the following would be the acoustic criteria applicable to this project:

External Day Maximum of 60 dB(A) LAeq Night Maximum of 55 dB(A) LAeq Outdoor Living Areas (Night) Maximum of 50 dB(A) LAeq

Internal

Sleeping Areas 35 dB(A) LAeq(night) Living Areas 40 dB(A) LAeq(day)

Noise received at the first row of residence along both the Toodyay Road would, as shown by the noise contour plot attached as Figure C1 in Appendix C, comply with the Policies "Noise Limits", but would exceed the "Noise Target". Given the location of the development, we believe that the use of “Quiet House” design would be the preferred noise amelioration option and the construction of a noise barrier is not recommended. Therefore, "Quiet House" Design and notifications on titles are required. For the first row of residence along Toodyay Road, "Quiet House" design by way of Package A, as outlined in the Implementation Guidelines, for both the ground floor and first storeys, would be required. Under SPP 5.4, notification on titles are also required for the first row of residence along Toodyay Road. An example of a suitable notice, as provided within the Guidelines is:

This lot is situated in the vicinity of Toodyay and is currently affected, and / or may in the future be affected by transport noise.

Notes: 1 Alternative constructions to those listed for “Quiet House” Package A are acceptable,

provided they are assessed and a report submitted by a suitably qualified acoustic consultant. For Information, Package A requirements are attached in Appendix D.

Page 10: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX A

DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Page 11: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
Tim
Callout
Logger Location
Page 12: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX B

NOISE MONITORING RESULTS

Page 13: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

Herring Storer AcousticsJob No : 13173Date : 03 September 2013

Figure B1Appendix B

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

8022

/08/20

13 0:00

03:00

06:00

09:00

12:00

15:00

18:00

21:00

23/08/20

13 0:00

03:00

06:00

09:00

12:00

15:00

18:00

21:00

24/08/20

13 0:00

03:00

06:00

09:00

12:00

15:00

18:00

21:00

25/08/13

 00:00

03:00

06:00

09:00

12:00

15:00

18:00

21:00

26/08/13

 00:00

03:00

06:00

09:00

12:00

15:00

18:00

21:00

27/08/13

 00:00

SPL (dBA

)

Date/Time

Noise LoggingLAeq LAmin LA10 LA90

Page 14: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX C

NOISE CONTOUR PLOT FOR DAY PERIOD

Page 15: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
Page 16: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX D

PACKAGE A “QUIET HOUSE” DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Page 17: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

QUIET HOUSE DESIGN PACKAGES FOR FIRST ROW OF NEW RESIDENCES

AREA TYPE ORIENTATION PACKAGE A Bedrooms Facing Road Casement or awning windows with 6.38mm laminated glass

Eaves enclosed with 6mm compressed fibre cement board Hinged doors only, fitted with acoustic seals No vents to outside walls/eaves

Side-on to Road Casement or awning windows with 6.38mm laminated glass Eaves enclosed with 6mm compressed fibre cement board No vents to outside walls/eaves

Away from Road No Requirements Living and Work Areas Facing Road Casement or awning windows with 6.38mm laminated glass

Eaves enclosed with 6mm compressed fibre cement board 35mm (min) solid core external doors with acoustic seals Sliding doors to be fitted with acoustic seals and have overlapping meeting stiles No vents to outside walls/eaves

Side-on to Road Casement or awning windows with 6mm glass Eaves enclosed with 6mm compressed fibre cement board

Away from Road No Requirements Other indoor areas Any orientation No Requirement