Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap...
Transcript of Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap...
PROPOSED IRRIGATION SCHEME EXPANSION PROJECT,
STAMPRIET, HARDAP REGION
SCOPING REPORT (INCLUDING IMPACT ASSESSMENT)
Prepared for: Tristone Business Trust
Client Ref: Stampriet Irrigation EIA
SSLR Project No: 733.20070.00001
Revision No: Final
Month/Year: March 2019
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
i
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
Title Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
Scoping Report (Including Impact Assessment)
Project Manager Gerhard Jacobs
Project Manager e-mail [email protected]
Author Immanuel Katali
Reviewer Alex Pheiffer
Keywords Stampriet, Irrigation, Scheme, Water Abstraction, Increased, Expansion, Tristone
Status Final
SLR Project No 733.20070.00001
DOCUMENT REVISION RECORD
Rev No. Issue Date Description Issued By
A November 2018 First draft issued for client comment IK and EG
B March 2019 Final Report to Competent Authority EG
BASIS OF REPORT
This document has been prepared by an SLR Group company with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the
manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with Tristone Business Trust (the Client) as part or all of the services it
has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment.
SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any
purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have
executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty.
Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by
the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid.
SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work.
The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set
out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise.
This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on
any elements which may be unclear to it.
Information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document should only be relied upon in the context of the whole document
and any documents referenced explicitly herein and should then only be used within the context of the appointment.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TBT plans to expand its irrigation scheme (of 105 ha) to include a new portion, namely Portion A, on
Steyn’s Halt of the farm De Duine (198) (Steyn’s Halt), covering a total area of 5100 ha. An irrigation
scheme of 15 ha will be undertaken on this additional portion of land. With the expansion of the
irrigation scheme, TBT plans to renew the existing abstraction permits, while also amending the
abstraction limit from the current permitted 970 000 m³/year to 1 800 000 m³/year. This increase in
abstraction makes provision for the proposed 210 000 m³/year to be supplied from a new borehole
to be established on Steyn’s Halt.
Given that the land was previously cleared and used for rain fed corn plantations impacts on
heritage/cultural aspects are not expected. Through the project the capability of the land is being
realised. In the context of noise and visual related impacts, the increase in activities is relatively
small. In the context of air quality related impacts, the additional portion of land was previously
cleared and used for rain fed corn plantations. The continued use of the land by TBT for agricultural
purposes would therefore not change any impacts previously experienced. The use of pesticides and
farm practises on site could impact ecological systems through pollution of the environment and
generation of dust.
Specialist input was provided on the likely impact of the proposed project on groundwater
resources. This was seen as the main impact associated with the project and was the focus of issues
raised during the public participation process. The findings of the specialist input and other relevant
information have been integrated and synthesised into this Scoping (including impact assessment)
Report.
A summary of the assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
project is provided in the table below. The mitigated assessment assumes that mitigation measures
included in the environmental management programme (EMP) would be implemented by TBT.
SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Section Potential impact Significance of the impact*
Unmitigated Mitigated
Ecology
Pollution of environment with pesticides (which comprise insecticides, herbicides and fungicides)
Medium Low
Dust impacts on vegetation Low Low
Avifaunal deaths due to power lines Medium Low
Groundwater
Negative impact of pesticides, fertilizers and hydrocarbons on groundwater quality
High Low
Negative impact of increased abstraction rates on groundwater quantity downstream
Medium Low
Socio-economic Positive economic impacts High + High +
* The ratings are negative unless otherwise specified.
In summary, the expansion of the TBT Irrigation Scheme has the potential to result in negative
groundwater quality and quantity impacts and ecological impacts in the unmitigated scenario and
positive socio-economic impacts through increased job security, investment in the region and
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
ii
support of the local community and economy as well as the Namibian economy as a whole. The
project would also contribute to food security in Namibia as a whole.
SLR Namibia concludes that should TBT follow the actions (i.e. management and mitigation
measures) provided in the EIA and EMP report, the project would have an acceptable impact on the
surrounding physical and social environment.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
iii
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... I
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1
INTRODUCTION TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................................................................ 1 1.2
PROJECT MOTIVATION (NEED AND DESIRABILITY) ................................................................................. 3 1.3
EIA PROCESS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4
EIA TEAM ............................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5
OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ................................................................................................................ 5 1.6
LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................. 6 2
SCOPING METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 8 3
INFORMATION COLLECTION .................................................................................................................. 8 3.1
SCOPING REPORT ................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2
SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT........................................................................................................................ 9 3.3
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................... 10 3.4
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 11 4
IAPS ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1
STEPS IN THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS ................................................................................... 11 4.2
SUMMARY OF ISSUES RAISED .............................................................................................................. 12 4.3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 13 5
OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................................ 13 5.1
IRRIGATION SCHEME INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................................. 13 5.2
PUMP STATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 5.2.1
PIPELINES ................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 5.2.2
ON-FIELD IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND INFRASTRUCTURE ...................................................................................................... 13 5.2.3
LOGISTICS CENTRE AND SUPPORT FACILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 13 5.2.4
WATER SUPPLY AND USE ..................................................................................................................... 14 5.3
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION................................................................................................................... 15 5.4
WASTE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 15 5.5
SEWAGE MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................... 15 5.6
EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ............................................................................................................. 15 5.7
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................... 16 6
ALTERNATIVE SITE AND WATER ABSTRACTION OPTIONS .................................................................... 16 6.1
ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY OPTIONS ....................................................................................... 16 6.2
ALTERNATIVE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY OPTIONS ............................................................................... 16 6.3
ALTERNATIVE CROP OPTIONS .............................................................................................................. 16 6.4
THE “NO PROJECT” OPTION ................................................................................................................. 17 6.5
DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................ 18 7
BIOPHYSICAL ........................................................................................................................................ 18 7.1
CLIMATE .................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 7.1.1
GEOLOGY AND SOILS .............................................................................................................................................................. 18 7.1.2
TOPOGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY ........................................................................................................................................... 20 7.1.3
REGIONAL GROUNDWATER ................................................................................................................................................... 21 7.1.4
LOCAL GROUNDWATER ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 7.1.5
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
iv
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE/PROFILE ............................................................................................. 25 7.2
SURFACE RIGHTS AND LAND TENURE ................................................................................................................................... 25 7.2.1
HARDAP REGIONAL COUNCIL ................................................................................................................................................ 25 7.2.2
REGIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................................................................... 25 7.2.3
MARIENTAL RURAL ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 7.2.4
IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS................................ 26 8
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................................. 27 9
ECOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................. 28 9.1
ISSUE: POLLUTION OF ENVIRONMENT WITH PESTICIDES (WHICH COMPRISE INSECTICIDES, HERBICIDES AND 9.1.1
FUNGICIDES) ........................................................................................................................................................................... 28 ISSUE: DUST IMPACTS ON VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................... 30 9.1.2
ISSUE: AVIFAUNAL DEATHS DUE TO POWER LINES .............................................................................................................. 31 9.1.3
GROUNDWATER ................................................................................................................................... 32 9.2
ISSUE: NEGATIVE IMPACT OF INCREASED PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND HYDROCARBONS ON GROUNDWATER 9.2.1
QUALITY .................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 ISSUE: NEGATIVE IMPACT OF INCREASED ABSTRACTION RATES ON GROUNDWATER QUANTITY DOWNSTREAM......... 34 9.2.2
SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................................. 36 9.3
NOISE AND VISUAL ............................................................................................................................... 36 9.4
SOCIO-ECONOMIC ............................................................................................................................... 36 9.5
ISSUE: POSITIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS ...................................................................................................................... 37 9.5.1
HERITAGE ............................................................................................................................................. 37 9.6
CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 38 9.7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 39 10
CONSULTANT EXPERIENCE AND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ........................................... 41 11
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 42 12
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: TEAM CVS .................................................................................................................................. A
APPENDIX B: INFORMATION SHARING RECORD (BID, NEWSPAPER ADVERTS, SITE NOTICE) ........................ B
APPENDIX C: DATABASE .................................................................................................................................. C
APPENDIX D: MINUTES AND ISSUES AND RESPONSE REPORT ....................................................................... D
APPENDIX E: GROUNDWATER SPECIALIST STUDY ........................................................................................... E
APPENDIX F: EMP ............................................................................................................................................. F
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1: EIA PROCESS ...................................................................................................................................... 3
TABLE 2: PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT TEAM ................................................................................. 4
TABLE 3: RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND POLICIES ............................................................................................ 6
TABLE 4: SCOPING REPORT REQUIREMENTS STIPULATED IN THE EIA REGULATIONS .................................... 8
TABLE 5: TRISTONE’S IRRIGATION SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS ......................................................................... 11
TABLE 6: CONSULTATION PROCESS WITH IAPS AND AUTHORITIES .............................................................. 11
TABLE 7: CURRENT WATER SUPPLY AND PROPOSED WATER ABSTRACTION AMENDMENTS ...................... 14
TABLE 8: WATER QUALITY DATA OF TBT IRRIGATION BOREHOLES ............................................................... 24
TABLE 9: CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING IMPACTS: CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING ..................................................... 27
TABLE 10: SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT ..................... 39
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
v
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: REGIONAL LOCATION OF THE TRISTONE IRRIGATION SCHEME...................................................... 2
FIGURE 2: MEAN MONTHLY AND ANNUAL RAINFALL FROM 2000-2017 AT GOCHAS .................................. 18
FIGURE 3: GEOLOGY OF THE IRRIGATION SCHEME ....................................................................................... 19
FIGURE 4: GEOLOGICAL CROSS-SECTION (GGRETA, 2016) ............................................................................ 20
FIGURE 5: SITE RELIEF AND GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION ................................................................... 21
FIGURE 6: STAMPRIET TRANS BOUNDARY AQUIFER SYSTEM BOUNDARIES (GGRETA, 2016) ...................... 22
FIGURE 7: HYDROCENSUS BOREHOLE LOCATIONS ........................................................................................ 24
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
vi
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Acronyms / Abbreviations
Definition
CFU Commercial Farming Unit
DEA Directorate of Environmental Affairs
EAP Environmental Assessment Practitioner
EAPAN Environmental Assessment Professionals of Namibia
ECC Environmental Clearance Certificate
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
GAP Good Agricultural Practice
ha Hectares
IAPs Interested and Affected Party
m³/h Cubic Metres per Hour
MAP Mean Annual Precipitation
MAR Mean Annual Runoff
MAWF Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry
MET Ministry of Environment and Tourism
MSFU Medium Scale Farming Unit
PPP Public Participation Process
SLR SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd
SSFU Small Scale Farming Unit
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
1
INTRODUCTION 1
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1.1
This Scoping Report which includes an impact assessment has been compiled and distributed for
review and comment as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process for the
proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project.
This Scoping Report (including impact assessment) includes a description of the proposed project
and the affected environment, a summary of the EIA process followed to date, the findings of the
specialist studies, an assessment of the environmental impacts that the proposed activities are likely
to have and sets out SLR’s recommended management and mitigation measures.
Registered Interested and Affected Parties (IAPs) are being provided with the opportunity to
comment on this Scoping (including impact assessment) Report. Once the comment period closes,
the Report will be updated to a final report with due consideration of the comments received, and
will be submitted to the Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET): Department of Environmental
Affairs (Competent Authority) for decision-making.
INTRODUCTION TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT 1.2
Tristone Business Trust (TBT) has been operating an irrigation scheme since 2005. The irrigation
scheme is located ±40km south east of Stampriet, in the Hardap Region (Figure 1) and covers a total
area of 38 855 hectares (ha). The crops produced from the scheme include maize, oats, lucerne, fruit
and cow peas, which are sold on a commercial scale.
The scheme uses groundwater as specified under Permits 11 159; 11 116; 11 115; 10 472; 10 450; 10
475 and 10 423. There are currently nine boreholes drilled across the various portions of the scheme
that are used for groundwater supply, with an abstraction amount of up to 970 000m³/a. This
abstraction amount is permitted by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF).
The irrigation scheme currently covers the following farms:
Dikbos Portion 1 of Eerstbegin(197/1) (4890ha) for maize, Lucerne and oats
Witpan Portion B of De Duine (198B) (5085 ha) for maize and oats
Hartebeestloop (202) Remainder (6190ha) for fruits other than citrus
Hartebeestloop (202/1) (7235ha) for Lucerne, maize and oats
Ptn 1 (Oserikare) of Farm Breedestraat (204) (4420ha)
Okongona (203) (9140ha)
Ptn 3 (a Ptn of Ptn 2) of Farm Fricourt (199) (1895ha).
TBT plans to expand its irrigation scheme to include a new portion, namely Portion A, on Steyn’s Halt
of the farm De Duine (198) (Steyn’s Halt), covering a total area of 5100 ha. This additional portion
has three existing boreholes, which are too shallow and are not suitable for irrigation. The land is
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
2
already cleared and was previously used for rain fed corn plantations. No additional land clearing
would be required.
FIGURE 1: REGIONAL LOCATION OF THE TRISTONE IRRIGATION SCHEME
With the expansion of the irrigation scheme, TBT plans to renew the existing abstraction permits,
while also amending the abstraction limit from the current permitted 970 000 m³/year to
1 800 000 m³/year. This increase in abstraction makes provision for the proposed 210 000 m³/year
to be supplied from a new borehole to be drilled on the Steyn’s Halt portion.
Given that the land has already been cleared, this Scoping Report (including impact assessment)
focuses on the operational phase of the project.
SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd (SLR) has been appointed by TBT as the
independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) to undertake the EIA process.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
3
PROJECT MOTIVATION (NEED AND DESIRABILITY) 1.3
There has been a large demand for local produce in the market and as per Namibia Agriculture Policy
of 2015 it is the objective of the government to actively promote the sustainable utilization of
available resources for crop production to realize the country’s full crop production potential and
ensure food security at national and household levels. The proposed expansion of the irrigation
scheme and increase in water abstraction would support the scheme in reaching maximum output
and yield production. The increase in water requirements would be supplied by existing permitted
boreholes as well as from one new proposed borehole on Steyn’s Halt.
Furthermore, an increase in production would ensure that TBT remains competitive in the market.
Provided TBT complies with the mitigation measures outlined in this report, the project has the
potential to have the following positive socio-economic impacts:
An increase in the tax base of the economy
The continuation of jobs, and skills, in the labour sector, an increase in job creation
An increase in the production, and supply, of crops in the local market (a commodity which
is currently in high demand).
EIA PROCESS 1.4
EIAs are regulated by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET) in terms of the Environmental
Management Act, 7 of 2007. This Act was gazetted on 27 December 2007 (Government Gazette No.
3966) and enacted on 6 February 2012. The Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations:
Environmental Management Act, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 4878) were promulgated on 6
February 2012. Given that this project relates to irrigation and the use of abstracted groundwater,
the DWAF will provide recommendations to MET as part of the decision-making process.
Steps in the EIA process are outlined in Table 1 below. Further detail on the public participation
process is provided in Section 4.
TABLE 1: EIA PROCESS
Objectives Corresponding activities
Project initiation and Screening phase (June-July 2018)
- Identify environmental aspects and potential impacts of the proposed project
- Notify the decision-making authority of the proposed project
- Initiate the EIA Scoping process.
- Notify the MAWF of the proposed project.
- Submission of an application to MET.
- Identification of potential impacts that could occur as a result of the proposed project and related specialist terms of reference.
- Confirmation of EIA process to be followed.
- Identify key stakeholders (develop IAP database).
Scoping (including impact assessment) phase (July 2018 – January 2019)
- Involve Interested and Affected Parties (IAPs) in the scoping process through information sharing.
- Confirm potential environmental issues associated with the
- Notify government authorities and IAPs of the proposed project and EIA process (through telephone calls, e-mails, newspaper advertisements and site notices).
- IAP registration and submission of initial comments.
- Information sharing meeting.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
4
Objectives Corresponding activities
proposed project.
- Determine the terms of reference for specialist input and undertake specialist studies.
- Consider alternatives.
- Identify any fatal flaws.
- Provide details associated with the potentially affected environment.
- Assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project.
- Develop management and mitigation measures.
- Conduct specialist studies.
- Compilation of Scoping Report (including impact assessment) and EMP.
- Distribute Scoping Report and EMP to relevant authorities and IAPs for review.
- Forward finalised Scoping Report (including EMP) incorporating IAP comments to MET for decision making.
Within this framework, the required components of the EIA report are discussed in more detail as
part of the EIA methodology in Section 3.
EIA TEAM 1.5
As noted in Chapter 1, SLR is the independent firm of consultants that has been appointed by TBT to
undertake the EIA. The environmental project team is outlined in Table 2.
Gerhard Jacobs, the Project Manager has three years of relevant experience in Hydrogeology and
has previously managed projects in the mining and agriculture industries, amongst other. Ester
Gustavo, the project assistant and co-author has seven years’ experience in groundwater and
surface water assessment and has previously managed projects in the mining, power and energy
industries, while, Immanuel Katali, the project assistant and co-author has three years of experience
in the Environmental Management discipline dealing with EIAs and EMPs. Immanuel is certified
under the Environmental Assessment Professionals of Namibia (EAPAN). Alex Pheiffer, the
Reviewer, holds a Master’s Degree in Environmental Management (from the Rand Afrikaans
University) and has over 16 years of experience in a range of environmental disciplines, including
EIAs, EMPs, Licensing, Environmental Auditing and Monitoring, Review and Public Consultation. She
has expertise in a wide range of projects. She is certified under the Environmental Assessment
Professionals of Namibia (EAPAN). The relevant curriculum vitae documentation is attached in
Appendix A.
TABLE 2: PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT TEAM
Name Designation Tasks and roles Company
Gerhard Jacobs
Project Manager and Groundwater and Surface water Specialist
Management of the process, team members and other stakeholders
Groundwater and surface water assessment SLR Consulting
Immanuel Katali
Project Assistant and Environmental Assessment Practitioner
Assisting Project Manager in the EIA Process
Compilation of report
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
5
Name Designation Tasks and roles Company
Ester Gustavo
Project Assistant and Groundwater Specialist
Compilation of report
Groundwater assessment
Alex Pheiffer Environmental Assessment Practitioner
Quality Control and review
OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT 1.6
This Scoping Report including an impact assessment and management programme has been
distributed for a 30 calendar day review period from 25 February 2019 to 27 March 2019 in order to
provide registered IAPs with an opportunity to comment on any aspect of the proposed project and
the findings of the EIA process. Copies of the full report have been made available on the SLR
website (at https://slrconsulting.com/za/slr-documents/) and at the Windhoek National Library and
Stampriet Village Council. Electronic copies of the report can be requested from SLR.
For comments to be included in the final report that is submitted to the MET, comments should
reach SLR by no later than 27th March 2019.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
6
LEGAL FRAMEWORK 2
EIAs are influenced by national legislation and a range of guidelines. The legislation applicable to this
project and the EIA process is discussed further below.
The Republic of Namibia has five tiers of law and a number of policies relevant to environmental
assessment and protection, which includes:
The Constitution
Statutory law
Common law
Customary law
International law.
Key policies currently in force include:
EIA Policy (1995)
Namibia’s Environmental Assessment Policy for Sustainable Development and
Environmental Conservation (1994).
As the main source of legislation, the Constitution of the Republic of Namibia (1990) makes provision
for the creation and enforcement of applicable legislation. In this context and in accordance with its
constitution, Namibia has passed numerous laws intended to protect the natural environment and
mitigate against adverse environmental impacts.
In the context of the proposed irrigation project, there are several laws and policies currently
applicable. These are reflected in Table 3.
In addition MAWF would be responsible for authorising the renewal of the abstraction permits
including the increased abstraction volumes.
TABLE 3: RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND POLICIES
Year Name
Current Namibian legislation & Bills
1990 The Constitution of the Republic of Namibia of 1990
1997 Namibian Water Corporation Act, No. 12 of 1997
2003 Pollution control and waste management bill, 2004
2003 Agricultural (Commercial) Land Reform Amendment Act of 2003
2013 Water Resources Management Act, 2013
2007 Environmental Management Act No. 7 of 2007
2013 Water Resources Management Act, (Act No. 11 of 2013)
Former South African and SWA legislation still applicable in Namibia
1919 Public Health Act No. 36 of 1919
1956 Water Act No. 54 of 1956
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
7
Year Name
1969 Soil Conservation Act No. 76 of 1969
1974 Hazardous Substances Ordinance No. 14 of 1974
Namibian policy
1995 Namibia's Environmental Assessment Policy for Sustainable Development and Environmental Conservation
1995 National Agricultural Policy
2000 National Water Policy White Paper
2008 Green Scheme Policy
International law to which Namibia is a signatory
1989 The Rotterdam convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
8
SCOPING METHODOLOGY 3
INFORMATION COLLECTION 3.1
SLR used various sources to identify environmental issues associated with the proposed project and
the Terms of Reference for the required investigations.
Information used in the process was sourced from:
Project information provided by TBT which includes:
o Site layouts
o Technical and process information
Site visit by the SLR Project Team
SLR groundwater Specialist Study
Consultation with the Technical Project Team
Consultation with IAPs
Consultation with relevant authorities
Atlas of Namibia
National Groundwater Database (GROWAS)
Meteorological offices.
In case of people related impacts, the assessment focused on third parties and did not assess health
and safety impacts on workers. The assumption was made that these aspects are separately
regulated by health and safety legislation, policies and standards.
SCOPING REPORT 3.2
The main purpose of this Scoping Report is to indicate which environmental aspects relating to the
proposed activities will be assessed and to provide mitigation measures, where required.
Table 4 outlines the Scoping Report requirements as set out in Section 8 of the Environmental
Impact Assessment Regulations that were promulgated in February 2012 in terms of the
Environmental Management Act, 7 of 2007.
TABLE 4: SCOPING REPORT REQUIREMENTS STIPULATED IN THE EIA REGULATIONS
Requirements for a Scoping Report in terms of the February 2012 regulations Reference in report
(a) the curriculum vitae of the EAPs who prepared the report; Section 2 and Appendix A
(b) a description of the proposed activity; Section 5
(c) a description of the site on which the activity is to be undertaken and the location of the activity on the site;
Section 1
(d) a description of the environment that may be affected by the proposed activity and the manner in which the geographical, physical, biological, social, economic and cultural aspects of the environment may be affected by the proposed listed activity;
Section 7
(e) an identification of laws and guidelines that have been considered in the preparation of the Scoping Report;
Section 2
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
9
Requirements for a Scoping Report in terms of the February 2012 regulations Reference in report
(f) details of the public consultation process conducted in terms of regulation 7(1) in connection with the application, including -
(i) the steps that were taken to notify potentially interested and affected parties of the proposed application;
(ii) proof that notice boards, advertisements and notices notifying potentially interested and affected parties of the proposed application have been displayed, placed or given;
(iii) a list of all persons, organisations and organs of state that were registered in terms of regulation 22 as interested and affected parties in relation to the application; and
(iv) a summary of the issues raised by interested and affected parties, the date of receipt of and the response of the EAP to those issues;
Section 4
(g) a description of the need and desirability of the proposed listed activity and any identified alternatives to the proposed activity that are feasible and reasonable, including the advantages and disadvantages that the proposed activity or alternatives have on the environment and on the community that may be affected by the activity;
Section 1.3 and 6
(h) a description and assessment of the significance of any significant effects, including cumulative effects, that may occur as a result of the undertaking of the activity or identified alternatives or as a result of any construction, erection or decommissioning associated with the undertaking of the proposed listed activity;
Sections 9
(i) terms of reference for the detailed assessment; and Section 3
(j) a management plan, which includes -
(i) information on any proposed management, mitigation, protection or remedial measures to be undertaken to address the effects on the environment that have been identified including objectives in respect of the rehabilitation of the environment and closure;
(ii) as far as is reasonably practicable, measures to rehabilitate the environment affected by the undertaking of the activity or specified activity to its natural or predetermined state or to a land use which conforms to the generally accepted principle of sustainable development; and
(iii) a description of the manner in which the applicant intends to modify, remedy, control or stop any action, activity or process which causes pollution or environmental degradation remedy the cause of pollution or degradation and migration of pollutants.
Appendix F
SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT 3.3
A key issue identified during the process was the potential for impacts on groundwater resources.
SLR’s geohydrology team undertook a specialist study to assess this. The specialist study involved
the gathering of data (desktop and hydrocensus) relevant to identifying and assessing environmental
impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed project. These impacts have been assessed
according to pre-defined rating scales (see Section 9 below). The specialist study included
recommended mitigation measures to minimise potential impacts or optimisation measures to
enhance potential benefits as well as monitoring requirements, where required. These have been
incorporated into the EMP. The methodology applied to the specialist study is included in the
specialist report attached as an appendix to this report.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
10
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 3.4
The key assumptions and limitations are detailed below.
Details of the site operations and design information used to describe the project and
identify impacts were provided by TBT. It is assumed that this information is accurate and
that the project will be implemented and operated as described.
Monitoring data and the results of a hydrogeological study formed the basis for the
assessment of impact significance.
The identification of environmental impacts, the rating of impact significance and the
recommendation of mitigation measures assumed that the design parameters and standard
operating conditions at the Irrigation Project are implemented with an acceptable level of
management and maintenance efficiency. Occasional non-compliances or limited failures
are an accepted part of operations and were thus included in the impact assessment.
This study does not, and cannot, assess the environmental risks associated with fires,
accidents, very poor site management or maintenance and acts of nature. A full risk
assessment would be required to deal with these issues.
The assumptions and limitations of the specialist study or opinion are detailed in the
specialist report.
Pump test evaluation indicates that the groundwater potential for the TBT can meet the
higher demand although certain long term predictions cannot be made at the moment.
According to DWAF a regional groundwater model is in development for the STAS aquifer
(pers. comment Bertram Swartz). The objective of this model will be to determine and
predict the long term effects of abstraction for irrigation and other industrial uses on the
STAS aquifer. Once this model is completed it should be used to make realistic predictions of
the impacts of current and future water use in the area. The model will be used to
determine the sustainable use of the aquifer as a whole and to actively manage the aquifer
and all water users.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
11
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS 4
A public participation process is being undertaken to inform the EIA process. The purpose of the
public participation process was to ensure that all persons and/or organisations that may be
affected by, or interested in, the proposed project, were informed of the project and could register
their views and concerns. By consulting with relevant authorities and IAPs, the range of
environmental issues to be considered in the Scoping Report (including the assessment of impacts)
has been given specific context and focus. Included below is a summary of the IAPs consulted, the
process that was followed, and the issues that were identified.
IAPS 4.1
A broad list of persons, group of persons or organisations that were informed about the project and
who were requested to register as IAPs, if affected by or interested in the project, is included in
Table 5 below.
TABLE 5: TRISTONE’S IRRIGATION SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS
IAP Grouping Organisation
Local and regional government – councillors and key officers
Stampriet Village Council, Hardap Regional Council
Government Ministries Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET): Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA)
Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry (MAWF): Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF)
Government Parastatals NamWater
Residents and farmers Home owners/tenants in Stampriet and Farmers.
Media Newspaper adverts: Namibian Sun and Die Republikein
Other interested and affected parties
Any other people with an interest in the proposed project or who may be affected by the proposed project.
The IAP database for the EIA process is included in Appendix C of the report.
STEPS IN THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS 4.2
Table 6 sets out the steps that were followed as part of the public participation process.
TABLE 6: CONSULTATION PROCESS WITH IAPS AND AUTHORITIES
Task Description Date
Notification - regulatory authorities and IAPs
Notification to MET SLR submitted the Application for ECC to MET. July 2018
IAP identification
The IAP database was updated to include additional IAPs. A copy of the IAP database is attached in Appendix C.
All parties who registered or showed an interest in the EIA process, together with relevant Local, Regional and Governmental Ministries are included in Appendix C.
June 2018 throughout the process
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
12
Task Description Date
Distribution of background information document (BID)
BIDs were distributed via email to all authorities and IAPs on the IAP database and were available at the information-sharing meeting. Copies of the BID were made available on request to SLR.
The purpose of the BID was to inform IAPs and authorities about the proposed project, EIA process, possible environmental impacts and means of providing input into the EIA process. Attached to the BID was a registration and response form, which provided IAPs with an opportunity to submit their names, contact details and comments on the project. A copy of the BID is attached in Appendix B.
July and September 2018
Site notices A site notice was placed at the TBT’s Irrigation Scheme entrance. A copy of the site notice is included in Appendix B.
July 2018
Newspaper Advertisements
Block advertisements were placed as follows:
- The Republikein (21 and 28 July 2017)
- The Namibian Sun (21 and 28 July 2017).
Refer to Appendix B.
September 2018
Public meeting and Focus Group meetings and submission of comments
Information-sharing Meeting
A public information-sharing meeting was held at the Stampriet Boerevereniging Hall. A copy of the presentation and attached register is attached as Appendix B.
September 2018
Comments and Responses
Minutes of the meeting and comments received during the process are attached in Appendix D.
-
Review of draft Scoping Report
IAPs and authorities (excluding MET) review of Scoping Report and EMP
Authorities and IAPs have 30 calendar days to review the Scoping Report and submit comments in writing to SLR.
February 2019
MET review of Scoping Report and EMP
The final Scoping Report, including authority and IAP review comments, will be delivered to MET on completion of the public review process.
March 2019
SUMMARY OF ISSUES RAISED 4.3
All issues that have been raised to date by authorities and IAPs are included in Appendix D. The key
issues raised relate to:
Impacts on groundwater levels and availability to third party users
Impacts on the groundwater quality.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
13
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5
OVERVIEW 5.1
The proposed project includes the following activities:
Proposed expansion of the irrigation scheme to include an 8th farm portion namely
Portion A, Steyn’s Halt of the farm De Duine (198) (Steyn’s Halt), covering a total area of
5100 ha and with three existing boreholes that are shallow.
Proposed renewal of groundwater abstraction Permits 10 450; 10 472; 10 423; 10 475;
11 151; 11 116; and 11 159
Proposed amendment of the permitted groundwater abstraction quotas from
970 000 m³/annum to 1 800 000m³/annum inclusive of 210 000 m³/annum from a new
borehole to be drilled on Steyn’s Halt.
The main operational components of the proposed project are described below.
IRRIGATION SCHEME INFRASTRUCTURE 5.2
The existing irrigation scheme is on commercial land with existing associated infrastructure. Existing
infrastructure comprises boreholes, pipelines, tanks, on-field irrigation systems, plantations, a
logistics centre and accommodation. No infrastructure exists on the new Steyn’s Halt farm portion.
Additional irrigation infrastructure required for the proposed project is described below.
Pump stations 5.2.1
Boreholes at the existing farm portions have been installed with electrical submersible pumps. The
new borehole to be established on Steyn’s Halt would be equipped with an irrigation pump station.
Pipelines 5.2.2
A low-pressure underground pipeline of ±40 mm in diameter is installed on the existing farm
portions. This pipeline runs from the boreholes located on the various farms to the irrigation
scheme. For the Steyn’s Halt farm portion, a standalone system will be established.
On-field irrigation system and infrastructure 5.2.3
The existing irrigation systems consist of Centre Pivot Irrigation covering approximately 105 ha in
total. Similarly, the Steyn’s Halt farm portion will use a Centre Pivot Irrigation system covering
approximately 15 ha in total.
Logistics centre and Support facilities 5.2.4
To support the administrative activities of the irrigation scheme, the irrigation scheme includes a
Logistics Center which includes:
an office
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
14
chemical store and mixing facility used to store all pesticides (which comprise insecticides,
herbicides and fungicides) and fertilizer – this is a controlled facility with fire suppression,
emergency showers, and containment measures
above ground diesel facility for storage, handling and refuelling vehicles and machinery – the
storage tanks have a maximum capacity of 2500 litres each.
The above facilities would also support the activities on the new Steyn’s Halt.
Accommodation is provided in 17 houses as follows:
Hartebeesloop: 2 houses for managers and 4 houses for 12 labourers
Dikbos (Eerstebegin): 1 house for managers and 2 houses for 6 labourers
Okongona: 1 house for managers and 4 houses for 6 labourers
Witpan (De duine): 1 empty house
Grunfeld (Fricourt): 1 house for labourer
An existing empty house is located on the Steyn’s Halt portion, which is planned for the supervisor of
the farm and a team of 2 workers.
WATER SUPPLY AND USE 5.3
The water supply to the irrigation scheme is abstracted from nine boreholes (not all pumped
concurrently) that are drilled across the seven farm portions (Table 7). Greater volumes of water are
required for the irrigation scheme to meet increased crop production. The table below includes the
proposed increased abstraction volumes as well as the new additional portion (Portion A, Steyn’s
Halt of the farm De Duine (198)) that will require a total volume of water of up to
210 000m³/annum. The project irrigation will require approximately 223 m3 per hour over a
pumping period of 12 hours a day for crop irrigation and for general use, e.g. drinking water,
washing and cleaning and general domestic use. With reference to the table, the abstraction
volumes would increase from the permitted 970 000m³/annum to 1 800 000m³/annum.
TABLE 7: CURRENT WATER SUPPLY AND PROPOSED WATER ABSTRACTION AMENDMENTS
Farms Permit No & Borehole Existing Quota (m³/a)
Proposed amendment (m³/a)
Dikbos (Eerstbegin) (197/1) PN: 10 423, WW 32118 and WW 40316 190 000 250 000
Witpan (De Duine) (198B) PN: 10 475, WW 727 and WW 41056 220 000 250 000
Hartebeestloop (202) PN: 10 450, WW 37690 80 000 120 000
Hartebeestloop (202/1) PN: 10 472, WW 37688 140 000 220 000
Oserikare (Breedestraat) (204) PN: 11 115, WW 204028 150 000 250 000
Okongona (203) PN: 11 116, WW 203986 100 000 250 000
Grunfeld (Fricourt) (199) PN: 11 159, WW 203984 100 000 250 000
Steyn’s Halt of farm De Duine New - 210 000
Total 970 000 1 800 000
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
15
With reference to Table 7, TBT intends to apply for the renewal of its existing groundwater
abstraction permits and concurrently apply to amend its yearly abstraction. An application for
renewing and increasing the abstraction quotas of the existing permits will be submitted to DWAF.
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION 5.4
Power for the irrigation scheme is sourced from NamPower and a private distribution network.
Although a battery and solar combined system exists at Steyn’s Halt, this can only support the most
basic household appliances. Therefore the existing distribution network will be extended to include
Steyn’s Halt as follows:
Phase 1: The private electricity network established at Hartebeestloop, which currently
serves Witpan Portion B of De Duine (198B) will be extended from the Witpan transformer
via an additional 3 km of 22kV powerline to supply between 50 -100 kVA electricity to the
Steyn’s Halt portion.
Phase 2: A 22kV power line from the Auob line that goes from Stampriet to Gochas will be
extended to supply power to the second planned field on the Steyn’s Halt portion. This is the
main NamPower line servicing Gochas and the surrounding areas. The transformer will be
between 50 -100 kVA.
WASTE MANAGEMENT 5.5
Domestic non-hazardous waste is stored in an open pit. The exact quantities cannot be determined
and the type of waste varies according to seasons. Hazardous waste resulting from the use of
pesticides is stored at the chemical store and mixing facility and taken off site for disposal.
SEWAGE MANAGEMENT 5.6
The logistics centre and the small and medium scale farm housing have pit sewage systems. The
same system will be implemented on Steyn’s Halt.
EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING 5.7
Permanent staff on site includes:
1 x Stud Manager
1 x Game /hunting manager
3x Agronomist / Managers
25 x General Labourers.
1 x supervisor and 2 General labourers
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
16
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 6
Limited alternatives exist for the project. This is discussed further below.
ALTERNATIVE SITE AND WATER ABSTRACTION OPTIONS 6.1
The proposed project caters for the expansion of an existing irrigation scheme by incorporating an
additional neighbouring portion of land. Therefore no site or layout alternatives are available.
A component of the project caters for the increase in water abstraction volumes to meet an increase
in crop production and yield. This is being driven by market conditions and demand. Irrigation water
would be sourced from groundwater as this is the only sustainable resource available. No other
water supply options exist.
ALTERNATIVE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY OPTIONS 6.2
Power for the irrigation scheme is sourced from NamPower and a private distribution network.
Although a battery and solar combined system exists at Steyn’s Halt, this can only support the most
basic household appliances. Therefore the existing distribution network will be extended to include
Steyn’s Halt (see Section 5.4). No other feasible alternatives exist.
ALTERNATIVE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY OPTIONS 6.3
Potable water is sourced from an existing potable water supply source. The option of installing a
small purification plant for purifying water from the saline boreholes was considered. However, the
option was not financially or logistically feasible. No other feasible options exist.
ALTERNATIVE CROP OPTIONS 6.4
The crop options planned for Steyn’s Halt is white maize for the summer season and oats for the
winter season. Steyn’s Halt can only be reached by a two-spoor sand road crossing the dunes, with a
4-wheel tracked vehicle. There are existing 4-wheel tracked tractors and trailers that can reach
Steyn’s Halt. Initially crops planted at Steyn’s Halt will be limited to those that can withstand the
transport over the difficult terrain. Once the irrigation is fully established, a road will be built to
allow for better and easier access. This will allow for crops with higher returns.
An alternative is to grow crops such as asparagus, sweet potatoes, date palms, oranges, lemons and
micro greens. However, growing such crops requires knowledge and expertise that is often too
costly. Therefore, TBT proposes to only grow these crops during the second operational season.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
17
THE “NO PROJECT” OPTION 6.5
The No-Go alternative represents the option not to proceed with the proposed expansion of the
irrigation scheme. The assessment of this option requires a comparison between the options of
proceeding with the project with that of not proceeding with the project.
The food security situation in Namibia is characterised by extreme variability in levels of food
production, large volumes of coarse grain imports and disparity in household income levels. The
2013 Global Hunger Index, published by The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI),
ranks Namibia at 53 out of 120 countries assessed indicating a “serious food problem”. (Source:
www.wfp.org). Proceeding with the project attracts potential socio-economic benefits and potential
negative environmental impacts. The main direct benefit of the project is the local production of
food, thereby increasing Namibian food security and self-reliance. Potential negative impacts on
groundwater resources can be mitigated through compliance with sector specific standards
including the Good Agriculture Practise (GAP) standard. The sustainable use of groundwater as a
resource is controlled by DWAF through the issuing of abstraction permits that are supported by
pump testing data. Not implementing the project would result in the region and Namibia in general
not benefiting from the increase in food security associated with the project.
For the purpose of this assessment, the status quo was considered in the unmitigated scenario in
comparison to establishing the proposed development in the mitigated scenario.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
18
DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT ENVIRONMENT 7
This chapter provides a general overview of the current baseline conditions associated with
Irrigation Scheme and associated linear infrastructure. This section was compiled utilising the
available databases and aerial imagery.
BIOPHYSICAL 7.1
Climate 7.1.1
The Stampriet area experiences minimum temperatures as low as below 2˚C, where more than 30
days of the year experience frost. Maximum temperatures can escalate to 36˚C. Humidity is highly
variable throughout the year; the least humid month is October at 10-20% and most humid month is
around April at 60 – 70% humidity (Mendelssohn, et al., 2002).
While evaporation rates are high throughout the country, the southern area where the project is
located loses much more water through evaporation compared to the north-eastern and coastal
areas. This rate is higher during summer months due to high solar radiation. An annual average
evaporation rate of up to 2300 mm/annum is expected in the area.
Mean annual rainfall across the basin varies between 120 mm (Stampriet) and 240 mm
(Leonardsville). It is highly variable and therefore cannot be reflected accurately in a figure for
average precipitation. Rarely, extreme rainfall can reach 500 mm. Recording of rainfall at Stampriet
was discontinued by the Meteorological offices. Average monthly and average annual rainfall data
from Gochas, a settlement south of the TBT Irrigation scheme indicates that most rainfall events
occur during October to April, very little rain is experienced in winter and the highest rainfall was
experienced in 2011, 2012 and 2017 (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2: MEAN MONTHLY AND ANNUAL RAINFALL FROM 2000-2017 AT GOCHAS
Geology and soils 7.1.2
The geology of the area is primarily sandstones and mudstone of the Karoo Supergroup, with
isolated occurrences of dolerite intrusions (Figure 3).
Most of the area is covered by Kalahari sands that stretch across the eastern, north eastern and
north central parts of the country. The dominant soils at the irrigation scheme are Ferralic Arenosols
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
19
(Mendelsohn 2002). Ferralic Arenosols (ferralic refers to a high content of combined oxides of iron
and aluminium) are formed mainly by wind-blown sand. They are characterised by a high proportion
of sand (generally greater than 70 %), with the remainder being clay and silt. The sandy texture
allows good drainage and the loose structure results in little runoff.
FIGURE 3: GEOLOGY OF THE IRRIGATION SCHEME
Groundwater occurs in three main aquifers namely the Kalahari Beds, the Auob Sandstone and the
Nossob Sandstone. The average thickness of the Kalahari Aquifer is 100 m, the Auob 80 m, and the
Nossob 25 m (JICA 2002). In the south-eastern part of the Namibian STAS, the Kalahari sediments are
considerably thicker, reaching about 250 m in the ‘Pre-Kalahari Valley’ (Figure 4). The Auob
Sandstone Aquifer and the Nossob Sandstone Aquifer lie in the Ecca Group of the lower Karoo
Sequence and are separated by shale layers of the Mukorob Member, which is overlaid by Shale and
Silt stone (SLR, 2018).
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
20
FIGURE 4: GEOLOGICAL CROSS-SECTION (GGRETA, 2016)
Topography and hydrology 7.1.3
The altitude of the surrounding area is on average 1000 masl. It is a relatively flat area, with minor
dunes striking in a north-south direction.
The Aoub, Olifants and Nossob Rivers are the major ephemeral rivers in the area that are part of the
larger Orange River Basin in Southern Africa. The Auob River lies closest to the irrigation scheme.
These rivers flow from northwest to south east only when above-average rainfall occurs, but they
are endoreic within the Orange River Basin. These rivers are reported to seldom carry water for a
long distance and their runoff never reaches the Orange River but rather dissipates into the Kalahari
Desert about 130 km to the north of the Orange River.
Their courses cut through very flat areas that are dominated by Kalahari sands and therefore result
in poorly defined catchments (Mendelsohn, 2002) (Figure 3). Numerous salt pans occur in the area,
resulting from the evaporation of water from ponds.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
21
FIGURE 5: SITE RELIEF AND GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
Regional groundwater 7.1.4
Occurrence
The irrigation scheme is situated in the Stampriet Transboundary Aquifer System (STAS) (Figure 6)
and makes use of water from the (sub-) artesian aquifer for irrigation purposes. The boundaries of
the STAS are well defined in Namibia (Figure 6). In Namibia, the STAS covers an area of about
71 000 km², or about 8.6 % of the country's total surface area (Alker, 2007).
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
22
FIGURE 6: STAMPRIET TRANS BOUNDARY AQUIFER SYSTEM BOUNDARIES (GGRETA, 2016)
The three main aquifers in the STAS in Namibia are in the Kalahari Beds, the Auob Sandstone and the
Nossob Sandstone. The Auob and Nossob Aquifers are confined and free flowing in the Auob Valley
from Stampriet and further downstream, as well as in the Nossob Valley around Leonardville.
Several springs are located in the eastern outcrop of the Kalkrand Basalt in the northwest (SLR,
2018).
The Auob aquifer contains the most water, however all groundwater within the estimated volume
will not be available for groundwater abstraction; a volume of water will remain within the aquifer
due to the storativity. The storativity in the Auob and Nossob aquifers is similar; these aquifers
would experience similar drawdowns if abstracted at the same rate. On the other hand, much larger
amounts of groundwater would need to be abstracted from the Kalahari aquifer to lower the water
level by the same amount, due to a lower storativity (SLR, 2018).
Recharge
Most aquifer recharge is thought to occur on Namibian territory (Puri 2001, 52). Estimates based on
studies conducted in the region are that recharge to the artesian aquifers in normal rainfall years is
relatively low to non-existent (0.5% of rainfall), but considerable recharge may occur during wet
years (as much as 3% of rainfall) (JICA 2002 and GGRETA, 2016). According to GGRETA (2016),
recharge via sinkholes and faults are the dominant mechanism of recharge in the north-western and
western boundaries of the STAS, and specifically to the Auob aquifer. It has been confirmed that
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
23
water tables begin to rise in artesian aquifers some 50 km from these recharge areas a few weeks
after heavy rainfall has occurred (SLR, 2018).
Abstraction and use
A large number of boreholes abstract water from the STAS area in Namibia with the largest
consumer (47%) being irrigation. Other uses include stock watering at 37.5%, domestic use at 15%
and a small proportion of less than 1% for tourism (GGRETA, 2016). Of the total annual groundwater
abstraction from the STAS, 66% is from the Kalahari aquifers, 33% from the Auob aquifer and only
1% from the Nossob aquifer (GGRETA, 2016).
Water quality
Regional groundwater quality deteriorates in a south-south-easterly direction because the Kalahari
in the central parts of the basin consists mainly of fine sand, silt and clayey deposits which have
accumulated mineral salts due to low rainfall and runoff as well as high evaporation. The confining
layer of the Auob Aquifer has also been largely carried away in the south-eastern parts of the pre-
Kalahari River, resulting in saline groundwater. The south-eastern area of the STAS is referred to as
the “Salt Block” because of the brackish to saline water in the Kalahari, Auob and Nossob Aquifers
(SLR, 2018).
Local groundwater 7.1.5
A hydrocensus was conducted on the seven farms belonging to TBT as well as on neighbouring farms
that were accessible during survey period. In total 44 privately owned boreholes were located
(Figure 7).
Flows, levels and use
Groundwater flow mimics topography at a moderate gradient from northwest to south east
(Figure 5). The depth to groundwater level in the hydrocensus boreholes ranges between 7 and
50 mbgl. Two different aquifers are present and in use, namely the shallower Kalahari aquifer and
the deeper Auob aquifer. The shallower Kalahari aquifer is lower yielding and used for livestock and
game watering as well as domestic use while the deeper Auob aquifer is mostly used for irrigation.
TBT monitoring data indicates small water level changes during the last three years in all monitored
boreholes. These changes can be linked to increased abstraction during warm summer months
(December - March) and reduced groundwater abstraction in winter months as temperatures cool
down and crops use less water. No permanent trend of water level decline can be observed and
therefore the current water use is considered sustainable (SLR, 2018).
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
24
FIGURE 7: HYDROCENSUS BOREHOLE LOCATIONS
Water quality
Groundwater water quality monitoring data has been compared to the DWA National Drinking
Standards for human consumption of 1991 (Table 8). For boreholes where repeat sampling has been
done (Grunfelde and Dikbos), it is possible to see that no deterioration in water quality took place
over the last three years. Water quality for the five boreholes sampled and analysed indicates mostly
a low risk (Group C) due to the elevated concentrations of nitrate except for Witpan which has good
quality water (Group B). Osirekare and Grunfelde have elevated sodium concentrations which can
cause salinization and crust formation when used for irrigation.
TABLE 8: WATER QUALITY DATA OF TBT IRRIGATION BOREHOLES
Potential
All abstraction boreholes that are used for irrigation on the TBT irrigation scheme tap the sub-
artesian Auob aquifer. The Auob aquifer contains the biggest volume of water in the STAS. Of the
Date Borehole no p H
Total Dissolved
Solids (TDS)
Chloride
as Cl-
Fluoride
as F-
Sulphate
as SO42-
Nitrate as
N
Sodium as
Na
Potassium
as K
Magnesiu
m as Mg
Calcium
as Ca
Bicarbonate
as HCO3
Jul-15 WW204028 (Osirekare) 8.6 1291 138 2.1 86 36 447 7.8 2.2 3.7 699
Sep-15 WW203984 (Grunfelde) 8.4 1122 102 2 88 28 358 7.0 1.4 1.7 476
Sep-18 WW203984 (Grunfelde) 7.9 937 56 0.9 52 38 273 8.4 14 23 567
Sep-15 WW203986 (Okongona) 8.5 1407 190 2.5 101 27 449 11 2.3 2.4 532
Mar-16 WW32118 (Dikbos) 7.4 594 36 0.6 36 22 108 8.8 29 39 342
Sep-18 WW32118 (Dikbos) 7.6 595 37 0.5 35 24 106 9.0 29 42 348
Mar-16 WW41056 (Witpan) 8.2 559 40 0.6 27 12 115 9.2 26 29 348
Group A
Group B
Group C
Group D
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
25
installed boreholes, pump testing was conducted on three boreholes drilled in 2015 on farms
Okongona (Borehole WW 203986), Osirekare (Borehole WW204028) and Grunfelde (borehole WW
203984). No results are available for the remaining irrigation boreholes due to the age of the
boreholes. Pump testing data indicates that the proposed abstraction rates should be sustainable.
Long term piezometric levels should be monitored.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRUCTURE/PROFILE 7.2
Surface Rights and Land Tenure 7.2.1
Governed by the Stampriet Village council, the majority of land is privately owned freehold land. The
majority of the land is used for agriculture and tourism activities by private individuals and
companies, with very little government agriculture taking place. The sizes of the freehold private
farms range between 5 000 and 10 000ha (Mendelsohn, 2002). The Tristone Irrigation Project is on
commercial land that is administered by the Tristone Business Trust. Land administered by the Trust
is used for crop production as well as naturally occurring game but primarily the land is used for
cattle ranching. The surrounding areas are currently used for livestock grazing, and other irrigation
projects are visible along the Auob River.
Hardap Regional Council 7.2.2
The region comprises of six constituencies including Gibeon, Mariental Rural, Mariental Urban,
Rehoboth Rural, Rehoboth Urban East and Rehoboth Urban West. The region stretches the entire
width of Namibia from the Atlantic Ocean in the west to Namibia’s eastern international border. In
the northeast, it borders the Kgalagadi District of Botswana, and in the southeast, it borders South
Africa’s Northern Cape Province. The region is largely dependent on agricultural and cattle farming.
The region is also bordered by Angola, Botswana, Zimbabwe and Zambia (Namibia Statistics Agency,
2011).
Regional demographics 7.2.3
Of the employed population in the Hardap Region’s, 64% earn wages and salaries as the main source
of income with 7% coming from farming (Namibia Statistics Agency, 2011). This shows that the
majority of the region is economically active. Of the employable population, only 65% of the
population is currently employed. This is slightly lower than the national average of 66.9%. There is
therefore a need for additional employment opportunities in the Region.
Mariental Rural 7.2.4
The project area falls within the Mariental Rural Constituency in the Hardap Region. The Mariental
Rural Constituency has a population of approximately 15 308 of which 65% are employed. The
majority of the people in Mariental Rural earn wages and salaries (61%) and are employed in the
agricultural industry (Namibia Statistics Agency, 2011).
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
26
IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS 8
Environmental aspects and potential impacts were identified through review of the technical project
details provided by TBT, field observations by the SLR EIA team, stakeholder inputs during the public
participation process and specialist input.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
27
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 9
An assessment of the potential positive and negative impacts associated with the expansion of the
irrigation scheme and increase in groundwater abstraction for irrigation purposes is provided in the
sections below. Given that the land was previously used for rain fed corn plantations, no additional
land clearing would be required. Therefore, the impact assessment focuses on the operational phase
of the project only.
The impacts are discussed under issue headings in this section. Impacts are considered in a
cumulative manner where possible such that the impacts of the proposed project are seen in the
context of the operational Irrigation Scheme and the baseline conditions, described in Sections 5 and
7, respectively. Information that has been included in Section 7 will not be repeated below.
Mitigation measures identified to reduce and remedy the assessed impacts are provided under the
relevant impact discussions sections. An EMP for the project is included in Appendix F. It is
important to note that the assessments below include the potential direct, indirect and cumulative
impacts associated with the proposed project.
Both the criteria used to assess the impacts and the method of determining the significance of the
impacts is outlined in Table 9. This method complies with the Environmental Impact Assessment
Regulations: Environmental Management Act, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 4878) EIA regulations.
Part A provides the approach for determining impact consequence (combining severity, spatial scale
and duration) and impact significance (the overall rating of the impact). Impact consequence and
significance are determined from Part B and C. The interpretation of the impact significance is given
in Part D. Both mitigated and unmitigated scenarios are considered for each impact.
TABLE 9: CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING IMPACTS: CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING
PART A: DEFINITION AND CRITERIA Definition of SIGNIFICANCE Significance = consequence x probability
Definition of CONSEQUENCE Consequence is a function of severity, spatial extent and duration
Criteria for ranking of the SEVERITY/NATURE of environmental impacts
H Substantial deterioration (death, illness or injury). Recommended level will often be violated. Vigorous community action. Irreplaceable loss of resources.
M Moderate/ measurable deterioration (discomfort). Recommended level will occasionally be violated. Widespread complaints. Noticeable loss of resources.
L Minor deterioration (nuisance or minor deterioration). Change not measurable/ will remain in the current range. Recommended level will never be violated. Sporadic complaints. Limited loss of resources.
L+ Minor improvement. Change not measurable/ will remain in the current range. Recommended level will never be violated. Sporadic complaints.
M+ Moderate improvement. Will be within or better than the recommended level. No observed reaction.
H+ Substantial improvement. Will be within or better than the recommended level. Favourable publicity.
Criteria for ranking the DURATION of impacts
L Quickly reversible. Less than the project life. Short term
M Reversible over time. Life of the project. Medium term
H Permanent. Beyond closure. Long term.
Criteria for ranking the SPATIAL SCALE of impacts
L Localised - Within the site boundary.
M Fairly widespread – Beyond the site boundary. Local
H Widespread – Far beyond site boundary. Regional/ national
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
28
PART B: DETERMINING CONSEQUENCE
SEVERITY = L
DURATION Long term H Medium Medium Medium
Medium term M Low Low Medium
Short term L Low Low Medium
SEVERITY = M
DURATION Long term H Medium High High
Medium term M Medium Medium High
Short term L Low Medium Medium
SEVERITY = H
DURATION Long term H High High High
Medium term M Medium Medium High
Short term L Medium Medium High
L M H
Localised Within site boundary
Site
Fairly widespread Beyond site boundary
Local
Widespread Far beyond site
boundary Regional/ national
SPATIAL SCALE
PART C: DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE
PROBABILITY (of exposure to impacts)
Definite/ Continuous H Medium Medium High
Possible/ frequent M Medium Medium High
Unlikely/ seldom L Low Low Medium
L M H
CONSEQUENCE
PART D: INTERPRETATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
Significance Decision guideline
High It would influence the decision regardless of any possible mitigation.
Medium It should have an influence on the decision unless it is mitigated.
Low It will not have an influence on the decision.
*H = high, M= medium and L= low and + denotes a positive impact.
ECOLOGY 9.1
Issue: Pollution of environment with pesticides (which comprise insecticides, 9.1.1
herbicides and fungicides)
Introduction
Given that the land was previously cleared and used for rain fed corn plantations no additional land
clearing would be required. This assessment considers the potential impacts associated with the use
of pesticides (which comprise insecticides, herbicides and fungicides). The application of pesticides
as a routine measure to decrease herbivory, seed predation and interspecific competition can cause
pollution to the environment. The leaching into groundwater would have further impacts on the
regional biodiversity (discussed separately under Section 9.2).
Impact assessment
Pesticides form one of the three pillars of the so-called 'green revolution'; the other two being new
and rapidly replaced seed varieties, and high fertilizer inputs. Because invertebrate organisms are a
food source for a large number of vertebrates, pesticides, even the ones that are designed to affect
only one or two target groups, have spill over effects on the ecosystem and may cause morbidity and
mortality in secondary consumers of all kinds (AWR, 2015). Effects of compounds that are not
completely biodegradable are cumulative, building up in the ecosystem.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
29
Although direct contact may cause death of organisms, the potential exists for chemicals to spread
beyond the site boundaries. Herbicides, especially those that disrupt reproductive processes in
plants, may have similar effects on native plants and result in a localised alteration of population
sizes.
Given the above, the cumulative unmitigated severity is high, but may be reduced to low with the
successful implementation of the mitigation measures.
Although the direct impacts may occur within the site boundary, the project could contribute to
cumulative impacts at a broader scale. Potential impacts would extend for the life of the project and
may be reversible over time.
Without any mitigation the probability associated with the impacts is high. With mitigation, the
probability of impacts will be reduced to low.
The significance of this potential impact is medium in the unmitigated scenario and low with
mitigation.
Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial Scale Consequence Probability of occurrence
Significance
Unmitigated H M M M H M
Mitigated L M L L L L
Mitigation measures
Objectives
Responsible use of pesticides.
Prevent degradation of ecological systems.
Measures to be implemented
Chemicals should not be used as the main form of pesticide control; use should form part of an
integrated pest management (IPM) approach. IPM is an approach to pest management that blends
all available management techniques - nonchemical and chemical - into one strategy. Use pesticides
only when pest damage exceeds an economic or aesthetic threshold
Bio-degradable and / or environmentally acceptable chemicals and pesticides will be used as far as
possible.
TBT will follow international standards of best practice in the use of pesticides in agriculture. This
will include:
Select and use chemicals with low toxicity outside target groups (i.e. highly specific), short
half-lives and high levels of adsorption to reduce leaching issues.
The eco-toxicity of each chemical will be confirmed using an independent database such as
the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) Pesticide Database.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
30
Use optimal, not maximal doses
Apply herbicides and fungicides with boom sprayers or during planting
Apply for as short periods as possible and select days that are not windy
Ensure that there is no overspray that drifts into the adjacent indigenous habitats or into
areas of human habitation
Given that most of the chemicals will be applied through the irrigation system, using an
optimal water management approach based on measured soil moisture levels will also mean
that leaching and runoff will be limited.
Strictly control and allow for direct application of herbicides to minimise effects on native
ecosystems.
Implement a monitoring programme that caters for both the presence and abundance of different
pests (fungi as well as invertebrates) and the effects of different management options.
Issue: Dust impacts on vegetation 9.1.2
Introduction
In the context of air quality related impacts, the additional portion of land, Steyn’s Halt portion, was
previously cleared and used for rain fed corn plantations. The continued use of the land by TBT for
agricultural purposes would therefore not change any impacts previously experienced. However,
wind-blown dust from exposed or worked soils resulting in fall out dust could impact the
surrounding biophysical environment.
Impact assessment
Fugitive dust emissions could result in the smothering of vegetation in the region. This in turn can
have an impact on invertebrates and grazers who rely on the vegetation as a food source. The
severity of this impact would be medium in the unmitigated scenario and could be reduced to low
through mitigation.
Dust fallout impacts are of medium duration and would extend beyond the site boundaries. It is
expected that once plants, fields will generally be kept relatively moist in order to ensure optimal
plant growth and thereby prevent fugitive dust emissions. The preservation of the soils for
agriculture is a major priority for the ongoing sustainability of the project. The probability is
considered to be low in the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios.
The significance of impacts on air quality during is low in both the unmitigated and mitigated
scenarios.
Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial Scale Consequence Probability of occurrence
Significance
Unmitigated M M M M L L
Mitigated L M M L L L
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
31
Mitigation measures
Objectives
To minimise the generation of dust.
Prevent degradation of ecological systems.
Measures to be implemented
Although some of the below measures are already in place it is worth re-iterating the importance to
continue with these mitigation measures.
Avoid as far as possible ploughing if the soil is dry and/or if there are high winds (exceeding
24 km/h). Planting should occur shortly after ploughing.
Do not till on fallow and bare ground when average wind speeds exceed 40 km/h.
Cover piles of fertilizer, compost, or soil. Use surface coverings like wood chips, mulch, or plastic
sheeting to help stabilize soil.
Use cover crops like grasses and legumes to help reduce wind erosion.
Use physical barriers such as fences, straw bales, and large trees to minimize the flow of dust.
Carry out visual dust monitoring and use water or dust suppressants when substantial dust is
blowing offsite.
Issue: Avifaunal deaths due to power lines 9.1.3
Introduction
Overhead electrical distribution lines could result in death or injury to birds as a result of striking
electrical installations and lines, or as a result of becoming electrocuted when shorting high-voltage
currents. The existing electrical distribution for the irrigation scheme will be extended to service
Steyn’s Halt. The additional lines are relatively minor when compared to the existing network.
However, collisions with electrical lines can impact the surrounding biophysical environment.
Impact assessment
All live electrical structures can result in electrocution of individual birds, which occurs when birds
make contact with conducting structures. The impacts of a single, relatively short power line are
seldom significant beyond its local environment. When considered cumulatively with existing
distribution networks both on site and off, the cumulative unmitigated severity is medium but can
be reduced to low through mitigation.
The impacts on birds would occur for the life of the operations and would impact bird populations
outside of the project boundaries. In the unmitigated scenario it’s possible that impacts would occur
but with mitigation these can be avoided as far as possible.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
32
The significance of the potential impact is medium in the unmitigated scenario and low in the
mitigated scenario.
Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial Scale Consequence Probability of occurrence
Significance
Unmitigated M M M M M M
Mitigated L M L L L L
Mitigation measures
Objectives
Prevent degradation of ecological systems.
Measures to be implemented
Make the top-most lines on all types of electrical lines visible to birds.
Monitor the lines regularly and install markers if there is any mortality.
GROUNDWATER 9.2
Issue: Negative impact of increased pesticides, fertilizers and hydrocarbons on 9.2.1
groundwater quality
Introduction
Agricultural activities on the project are mainly supported by irrigation, whereby a danger to recycle
pesticides and fertilizers via groundwater occurs through groundwater abstraction and usage. As a
result, percolating irrigation water on farms that have been treated with herbicides and insecticides
and where fertilizers are used, allow these chemicals to accumulate and potentially reach the
shallow groundwater table. Biodegradable materials are used where possible.
In addition the use of machinery and equipment requires the use of hydrocarbons. Hydrocarbons
have the potential to pollute groundwater resources through leaks and spills.
Impact assessment
Once pesticides and hydrocarbons have entered the hydrological cycle, their elimination is difficult,
and in most instances impossible, especially with groundwater. In unmitigated cases the
recommended concentrations would often be violated. Current groundwater quality analysis data
however shows no evidence of deteriorating water quality caused by TBT. Through the
implementation of the Good Agriculture Practise (GAP) standards and hydrocarbon management,
the severity can be reduced.
The impact would extend beyond the site boundary as contamination transport is expected to be
widespread, though local, following the groundwater flow patterns. Given that the deeper Auob
aquifer is protected by a confined layer, pollution dispersion would only occur in the shallow
Kalahari aquifer.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
33
Although contamination sources would be limited to the operational phase of the irrigation scheme,
any resultant contamination would extend beyond the life of the operations in the unmitigated case.
In the absence of mitigation recycling of potentially polluted groundwater could deteriorate
groundwater further through ongoing abstraction and usage. In the unmitigated case, the duration
of potential impacts would be long term. Where the GPA standards and hydrocarbon management
practises are applied, potential impacts could be reversed over time.
The potential for negative groundwater quality impacts exists. Where this groundwater is then used
for human or livestock consumption, the potential exists for health related impacts. The extent of
these impacts would depend on the concentration of these elements and the length of exposure of
potential receptors.
The significance of groundwater contamination due to the use of pesticides, fertilizers and
hydrocarbon is high in the unmitigated case reducing to low in the mitigated case.
Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial Scale Consequence Probability of occurrence
Significance
Unmitigated H H M H H H
Mitigated L M M L L L
Mitigation measures
Objectives
Reduce concentration of contaminants in irrigation water to prevent pollution of underlying
aquifer.
Measures to be implemented
The irrigation scheme will comply with the GAP codes and standards.
Implement the measures outlined in Section Error! Reference source not found.. In addition, with
egards to the storage and handling of pesticides and fertilisers, TBT will:
Provide appropriate storage on-site (well-marked, closed and covered storage area(s), on
impermeable substrate and with containment measures that can contain 110% of the total
volume stored).
Regular monitoring and maintenance of storage facilities for early detection of any potential
leakages.
Mixing or handling of materials within designated areas to minimise unnecessary spills to the
environment.
Immediate clean-up of any accidental spills.
Disposal of used containers and waste packaging in a suitable and approved manner.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
34
With regards to the storage, handling and use of hydrocarbons, TBT will:
Provide appropriate storage on-site (well-marked, closed and covered storage area(s), on an
impermeable substrate and with containment measures that can contain 110% of the total
volume stored).
Regular monitoring and maintenance of storage facilities for early detection of any potential
leakages.
Handling of hydrocarbons and maintenance of equipment and machinery within designated
areas with containment measures to minimise unnecessary spills to the environment.
Immediate clean-up of any accidental spills.
Disposal of used containers and waste packaging in a suitable and approved manner.
Crops that are adapted to the climate and soil conditions and that do not require excessive volumes
of pesticides and fertilizers will be planted.
An optimal water management plan that records and controls the volumes of water used, measures
soil moisture levels to limit leaching, and includes efficient irrigation methods will be implemented.
High sodium levels at Osirekare, Okongona and Grunfelde can cause salinization and crust formation
on the irrigated lands. Gypsum should be considered to mitigate these effects.
Special management for salinity control may be required. A 90% relative yield of moderately salt
tolerant crops can be maintained by using a low frequency irrigation system.
Monitoring boreholes (not used for pumping), intersecting both, the Kalahari and Auob aquifers, will
be established downstream of the irrigation scheme, near the southern border of the site.
Water samples from all production and monitoring boreholes will be taken annually and analysed for
pesticides, fertilisers and hydrocarbons. The data will be analysed for trends and where required
additional mitigation will be implemented in consultation with a specialist.
Issue: Negative impact of increased abstraction rates on groundwater quantity 9.2.2
downstream
Introduction
When groundwater is exploited, water levels decline and continue to do so until they either stabilize
at a lower level or, if abstraction is persistently greater than recharge, the aquifer is dewatered. This
could result in a decrease or loss of water supply to other groundwater users. The irrigation scheme
is located in a Water Controlled Area (WCA), where the aquifer is artesian and of high groundwater
potential. In addition abstraction permits that are supported by pump testing data, to ensure
abstraction rates are sustainable, are required from the DWAF.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
35
Impact assessment
A relatively high volume of groundwater abstraction is planned (currently at 970 000 m³/annum with
a proposed increase to 1 800 000 m3/annum) from the Aoub aquifer. This may pose a threat to the
downstream users of the same aquifer. Pumping test evaluation is necessary to determine at what
rate the boreholes can be pumped sustainably. Without more recent test pumping evaluation, it is
difficult to conclude the severity of the potential impact that the additional abstraction rates will
cause. Historical pump test evaluation indicates that the groundwater potential in the Aoub aquifer
can meet the higher demand although certain long term predictions cannot be made at the
moment. Current available data from time series water level recordings show no evidence of over
abstraction caused by TBT for the current abstraction rates. In the unmitigated case the severity of
potential impacts is considered to be medium reducing to low with mitigation where water is
abstracted at a sustainable yield in line with abstraction permits from DWAF.
The over abstraction of groundwater could lead to a drawdown in water levels and a related cone of
depression. In the absence of mitigation this could extend beyond the boundaries of the scheme to
neighboring farms. With mitigation over-abstraction would not occur reducing the spatial scale of
any potential impacts.
Abstraction impacts would occur for the life of the operations if unmitigated. Once active pumping
stops and where abstraction took place at a sustainable yield, groundwater levels would return to
natural conditions.
In the unmitigated case it is possible that groundwater levels would decrease and potentially affect
downstream users of the Aoub aquifer. It is however unlikely that abstraction impacts would be
experienced in the shallower Kalahari aquifer. With mitigation the likelihood of potential impacts
affecting third party users can be reduced.
The significance of groundwater abstraction impacts is medium in the unmitigated case reducing to
low in the mitigated case.
Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial Scale Consequence Probability of occurrence
Significance
Unmitigated M M M M M M
Mitigated L L L L L L
Mitigation measures
Objectives
To reduce the threat of lowering groundwater levels in the local aquifer which consequently
infringes on the volume available for surrounding water users.
To prevent the dewatering of the aquifer.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
36
Measures to be implemented
Abstraction permits must be obtained from DWAF and conditions of the permit which include
installation of water meters, maintenance of equipment to prevent leakages and monthly water
level readings must be adhered to and documented.
Permits must be renewed every two years or as required by DWAF, supported by an updated impact
assessment by a hydrogeologist.
Monitoring boreholes (not used for pumping), intersecting both, the Kalahari and Auob aquifers, will
be established downstream of the irrigation scheme, near the southern border of the site.
Water levels will be measured at monitoring boreholes on a monthly basis. The data will be used to
determine changes in groundwater levels due to pumping from the irrigation scheme. The data will
be analysed for trends and where required additional mitigation will be implemented in consultation
with a specialist. The monitoring data must be submitted as part of the monthly reporting to DWAF.
Regular pump testing of active boreholes should be undertaken to confirm the aquifer capacity and
sustainable long term abstraction rates.
SURFACE WATER 9.3
Given the sandy nature of the site, the related good drainage and the loose structure of the soils,
little runoff occurs. Rainfall water seeps into the Kalahari sands. Given the distance to the nearest
river and the ephemeral and endoreic nature of rivers in the vicinity of the irrigation scheme, very
limited to no potential exists for surface water runoff from the site to impact on the river or for the
irrigation scheme to affect any flow in the river. Therefore surface water impacts have not been
identified and an assessment has not been done.
NOISE AND VISUAL 9.4
The proposed project includes the expansion of the existing irrigation scheme of 105 ha to include
an additional irrigation scheme of 15 ha. In the context of noise and visual related impacts, this
increase is relatively small. Therefore impacts on noise and visual aspects have not been identified
and an assessment of these aspects has not been done.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC 9.5
Projects in general can bring with them an expectation of new employment. Given the small scale of
the proposed project within an existing irrigation scheme and in a relatively remote part of the
country, negative socio-economic impacts associated with an influx of job seekers are not expected
and therefore related impacts have not been identified or assessed.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
37
Issue: Positive socio-economic impacts 9.5.1
Introduction
In the broadest sense, activities associated with a project contribute towards positive socio-
economic impacts. The project has the potential to create socio-economic benefits through
continued employment, increased economic contributions and increased food security.
Impact assessment
The proposed project will result in positive socio-economic benefits through wages, taxes and
procurement of services. The proposed expansion of the irrigation scheme and increase in water
abstraction would support the scheme in reaching maximum output and yield production. This
would provide an invaluable contribution to food security and self-reliance in Namibia as a whole.
Furthermore, an increase in production would ensure that TBT remains competitive in the market.
The increased provision of products and services to the project as well as purchases by the upstream
supply chain would provide indirect economic benefits.
Economic impacts would be felt at a local community level as well as positively impact the Namibian
economy as a whole.
The direct positive economic impacts would occur for the life of the project.
In the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios, the significance of this potential impact is high positive.
Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial Scale Consequence Probability of occurrence
Significance
Unmitigated M+ M H H+ M H+
Mitigated M+ M H H+ M H+
Mitigation measures
Objectives
To enhance the positive socio-economic impacts
Measures to be implemented
TBT will ensure that the irrigation scheme is operated in a manner that ensures the sustainable use
of resources while maximising the production potential and economic value of the scheme.
Local labour will be used and on-going skills training will be undertaken.
HERITAGE 9.6
Given that the land was previously cleared and used for rain fed corn plantations no additional land
clearing would be required. Therefore impacts on heritage/cultural aspects have not been identified
and an assessment of these aspects has not been done.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
38
CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 9.7
Cumulative groundwater quantity impacts could be experienced in the region because the Aoub
Aquifer that is underlying the irrigation area is the most targeted and utilised local aquifer for
irrigation purposes. Cumulative groundwater quality impacts on the already brackish and saline
Kalahari aquifer could occur. Where GAP standards are complied with and abstraction is done is a
manner that meets the sustainable yield of the borehole and related aquifer, cumulative impacts on
the aquifer will be minimised.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
39
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10
This chapter summarises the key findings of the study.
TBT plans to expand its irrigation scheme (of 105 ha) to include a new portion, namely Portion A, on
Steyn’s Halt of the farm De Duine (198) (Steyn’s Halt), covering a total area of 5100 ha. An irrigation
scheme of 15 ha will be undertaken on this additional portion of land. With the expansion of the
irrigation scheme, TBT plans to renew the existing abstraction permits, while also amending the
abstraction limit from the current permitted 970 000 m³/year to 1 800 000 m³/year. This increase in
abstraction makes provision for the proposed 210 000 m³/year to be supplied from a new borehole
to be established on Steyn’s Halt.
Given that the land was previously cleared and used for rain fed corn plantations impacts on
heritage/cultural aspects are not expected. Through the project the capability of the land is being
realised. In the context of noise and visual related impacts, the increase in activities is relatively
small. In the context of air quality related impacts, the additional portion of land was previously
cleared and used for rain fed corn plantations. The continued use of the land by TBT for agricultural
purposes would therefore not change any impacts previously experienced. The use of pesticides and
farm practises on site could impact ecological systems through pollution of the environment and
generation of dust.
Specialist input was provided on the likely impact of the proposed project on groundwater
resources. This was seen as the main impact associated with the project and was the focus of issues
raised during the public participation process. The findings of the specialist input and other relevant
information have been integrated and synthesised into this Scoping (including impact assessment)
Report.
A summary of the assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
project is provided in Table 10. The mitigated assessment assumes that mitigation measures
included in the environmental management programme (EMP) would be implemented by TBT.
TABLE 10: SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Section Potential impact Significance of the impact*
Unmitigated Mitigated
Ecology
Pollution of environment with pesticides (which comprise insecticides, herbicides and fungicides)
Medium Low
Dust impacts on vegetation Low Low
Avifaunal deaths due to power lines Medium Low
Groundwater
Negative impact of pesticides, fertilizers and hydrocarbons on groundwater quality
High Low
Negative impact of increased abstraction rates on groundwater quantity downstream
Medium Low
Socio-economic Positive economic impacts High + High +
* The ratings are negative unless otherwise specified.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
40
In summary, the expansion of the TBT Irrigation Scheme has the potential to result in negative
groundwater quality and quantity impacts and ecological impacts in the unmitigated scenario and
positive socio-economic impacts through increased job security, investment in the region and
support of the local community and economy as well as the Namibian economy as a whole. The
project would also contribute to food security in Namibia as a whole.
SLR Namibia concludes that should TBT follow the actions (i.e. management and mitigation
measures) provided in the EIA and EMP report, the project would have an acceptable impact on the
surrounding physical and social environment.
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
41
CONSULTANT EXPERIENCE AND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 11
SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd (SLR) is the independent firm of consultants that
has been appointed by TBT to undertake the EIA and related process.
Gerhard Jacobs, the Project Manager has three years of relevant experience in Hydrogeology and
has previously managed projects in the mining and agriculture industries, amongst other. Ester
Gustavo, the project assistant and co-author has seven years’ experience in groundwater and
surface water assessment and has previously managed projects in the mining, power and energy
industries, while, Immanuel Katali, the project assistant and co-author has three years of experience
in the Environmental Management discipline dealing with EIAs and EMPs. Immanuel is certified
under the Environmental Assessment Professionals of Namibia (EAPAN). Alex Pheiffer, the
Reviewer, holds a Master’s Degree in Environmental Management (from the Rand Afrikaans
University) and has over 16 years of experience in a range of environmental disciplines, including
EIAs, EMPs, Licensing, Environmental Auditing and Monitoring, Review and Public Consultation. She
has expertise in a wide range of projects. She is certified under the Environmental Assessment
Professionals of Namibia (EAPAN).
The undersigned herewith declare that this report represents an independent, objective assessment
of the environmental impacts associated with TBT’s Irrigation Expansion project in the Hardap
Region of Namibia.
SLR has no vested interest in the proposed project other than fair payment for consulting services
rendered as part of the EIA process.
Immanuel Katali
(Report Author)
Gerhard Jacobs
(Project Manager)
Alex Pheiffer
(Project Reviewer)
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
42
REFERENCES 12
Environmental Management Act, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 4878) EIA regulations
Japan International Cooperation Agency - JICA (2002): The Study on the Groundwater Potential
Evaluation and Management Plan in the Southeast Kalahari (Stampriet) Artesian Basin in the
Republic of Namibia – Final Report
Mendelsohn, J., Jarvis, A., Roberts, C. and Roberts, T., (2002): Atlas of Namibia: A portrait of the land
and its people.- David Philip Publishers, Cape Town, RSA
Namibia Agriculture Policy, December 2015, Ministry of Agriculture Water and Forestry. Republic of
Namibia.
SLR (2018) Groundwater Study for Tristone Business Trust Irrigation Scheme.
The Constitution of the Republic of Namibia (1990).
The Environmental Impact Assessment Policy (1995).
The Environmental Assessment Policy for Sustainable Development and Environmental Conservation
(1994).
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
A
APPENDIX A: TEAM CVS
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
B
APPENDIX B: INFORMATION SHARING RECORD (BID, NEWSPAPER ADVERTS, SITE NOTICE)
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
C
APPENDIX C: DATABASE
Organisation Name Position Email Tel no.
Stampriet Village
Council
Mr. Eddy
Kohima
CEO [email protected] 063-260038
Hardap Regional
Council
Ms T. Basson CRO (Acting) [email protected]
Amandla
Isaacks
(Pvt Secretary) [email protected] 063-240944 or
'0816805637
Governor [email protected]
Ministry of
Agriculture, Water
and Forestry
Mr Betram
Swartz
Hydrogeologist [email protected] 061-2087089,
0812020710
Ministry of
Environment and
Tourism
Mr Damian
Nchindo
[email protected] 0612842717
NamWater
Mr. Nicolaas
du Plessis
Environmental
Manager
[email protected] 061- 712093,
0811279040
Ms Jolanda
Murangi
Farmer Jaco Kotze auobdrif@iwayna 0814422122
Farmer Jaco Van
Wyk
[email protected] 0816926164
Industry Gondwana
Anib Park
anibpark@gondwana-
collection.com
Industry Gondwana
Enviromental
Officer
enviro@gondwana-
collection.com
Individual Hannes
Meyer
Hannes Meyer
Trust
Individual Cronje Loftie-Eaton
+264-811243652
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
D
APPENDIX D: MINUTES AND ISSUES AND RESPONSE REPORT
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
E
APPENDIX E: GROUNDWATER SPECIALIST STUDY
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
F
APPENDIX F: EMP
Tristone Business Trust
Proposed Irrigation Scheme Expansion Project, Stampriet, Hardap Region
733.20070.00001
March 2019
i
AFRICAN OFFICES
South Africa
CAPE TOWN
T: +27 21 461 1118
FOURWAYS
T: +27 11 467 0945
SOMERSET WEST
T: +27 21 851 3348
Namibia
WINDHOEK
T: + 264 61 231 287
SWAKOPMUND
T: + 264 64 402 317