PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River...

67
PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College

Transcript of PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River...

Page 1: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PROPORTIONAL SYMBOLMAPPING

Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340)Prof. Hugh HowardAmerican River College

Page 2: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PROPORTIONAL SYBMOL MAP

DEFINED

Page 3: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PROPORTIONAL DEFINED• Proportional Symbol Map

– Map in which point symbols vary in size according to differences in magnitude of an attribute (variable)

Page 4: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PROPORTIONAL DEFINED• Proportional Symbol Map (cont.)

– The circle is most widely used shape, but other shapes can be used

Page 5: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PROPORTIONAL DEFINED• Proportional Symbol Map (cont.)

– Quantitative in nature– Point symbols are unlike those on a dot

map, which have the same size and value

Proportional Symbol Map Legends

Dot Map Legend

Page 6: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PROPORTIONAL DEFINED• Confusing terminology…

– Your textbook uses the term “Proportional”– ArcMap uses “Proportional” or

“Graduated,” depending on the scaling method used

• In ArcMap– Proportional Symbols

= Mathematical Scaling – Graduated Symbols

= Range-Graded Scaling

Page 7: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

APPROPRIATE DATA

Page 8: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

TRUE vs. CONCEPTUAL DATA• True Point Data

– Data collected at discrete points– Weather stations, seismometers, etc.

The point location is known for each feature or

phenomenon(x,y or lon,lat)

Page 9: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

TRUE vs. CONCEPTUAL DATA• Conceptual Point Data

– Data collected for enumeration units– Symbol is placed in the center of polygon

The center can be the geometric center (centroid),

or the visual center

Page 10: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

TRUE vs. CONCEPTUAL DATA• The distinction is sometimes blurry

– Enumeration units represented at small scales are treated as points

Points are county centroids, but county

boundaries are not shown

Page 11: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DATA STANDARDIZATION• Unstandardized, raw data are more

commonly used– Standardization can be useful– Compensate for size of enumeration units

(conceptual point data), etc.

Page 12: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DATA STANDARDIZATION• When standardizing conceptual point

data, consider the choropleth instead– Choropleth maps excel at representing

standardized areal data

Page 13: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

MAP PROJECTIONSand the

PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAP

Page 14: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

MAP PROJECTIONS• Equivalent (Equal Area) projections are

most appropriate – Distortion of relative sizes of areas can

mislead the map user

EquivalentConformal

Page 15: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL SHAPES

Page 16: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL SHAPES• Various symbol shapes can be used

• Two categories of point symbol– Geometric– Pictographic

GeometricDo not look like the thing

being mapped

PictographicDo look like the thing

being mapped

Page 17: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL SHAPES• The circle is the most widely used

– Compact and visually stable– Users prefer over other geometric symbols– Easy to construct and scale (PI r2)

Page 18: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL SHAPES• The square is a bit more awkward than

the circle– Blocky nature isn’t as efficient with space– Area of a square can be more accurately

estimated (L2)

Page 19: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL SHAPES• Pictographic symbols

– Can be very effective– Should be closely related to the theme– Complex symbols are potentially more

difficult to interpret in congested areas

Page 20: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL SHAPES• “3D” Symbols

– We aren’t good at estimating volumes– Employ 3D symbols for aesthetic

purposes, but don’t expect the map user to estimate volumes

Page 21: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS

Page 22: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• There are three primary methods of

scaling, or sizing, proportional symbols– Mathematical (Directly Proportional)– Perceptual– Range Graded

Page 23: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Mathematical

– The area of the point symbol is directly proportional to the data value

350 / 175 = 2

Area of the circle representing 350 is twice

that of the circle representing 175

Page 24: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Mathematical (cont.)

– Equivalent to an unclassed choropleth– Legend shows representative values

Page 25: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Mathematical (cont.)

– Difficult to interpret, because the map user can only differentiate a given number of symbol sizes—10 at most

– Studies indicate that map readers tend to underestimate the areas of larger symbols

Page 26: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Perceptual

– Symbols are systematically enlarged toward the higher end of the range

Page 27: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Perceptual (cont.)

– Compensates for the map user’s tendency to underestimate areas of larger symbols

Perceptual scaling is not widely used

today

Page 28: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Range-Graded

– Involves the organization of data values into classes, or ranges

Values are classified much like a

choropleth map

Page 29: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Range-Graded (cont.)

– Ranges are associated with a limited number of easily differentiated symbols

Page 30: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Range-Graded (cont.)

– Equivalent to a classed choropleth – Employs a limited number of symbol

sizes, allowing the map user to determine the general value using the legend

Page 31: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Range-Graded (cont.)

– Map-design research has provided guidelines for selecting symbol sizes that are easily differentiated

Page 32: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Range-Graded (cont.)

• Possibly the best scaling method– Readers can easily discriminate symbol

sizes and match them to legend symbols

Range graded provides greater contrast in circle sizes, but the result is more generalized

Range-Graded

Mathe-matical

Page 33: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SCALING METHODS• Range-Graded (cont.)

• Especially useful for pictographic symbols

– It is difficult to estimate areas of complex shapes

• Classification can be achieved using any data classification method

• Doesn’t work well if the map user fails to consult the legend

Page 34: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL OVERLAP

Page 35: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL OVERLAP• Trial-and-error is required to produce a

map with suitable symbol overlap

Neither “too full,” nor “too empty”

Page 36: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL OVERLAP• Symbols can be differentiated by

applying contrast

No contrast White outlines

Page 37: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SYMBOL OVERLAP• Symbols can be differentiated by

applying contrast (cont.)

Black outlines Transparency with outlines…

Page 38: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.
Page 39: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

REDUNDANT SYMBOLOGY

Page 40: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

REDUNDANT SYMBOLOGY• The use of more than one visual

variable to differentiate point symbols– To reinforce the idea of increasing

magnitudes

Quantitative Visual Variables

Page 41: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

REDUNDANT SYMBOLOGY• In addition to varying sizes of symbols,

lightness and hue can be incremented

Lightness(Monochromatic Sequential)

Hue-Lightness(Part-Spectral Sequential)

Page 42: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

REDUNDANT SYMBOLOGY• Lighter colors: lower values• Darker colors: higher values

Page 43: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN

Page 44: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Representative symbols can be

arranged in two fashions– Linear– Nested

Linear-Legend Arrangement

Nested-Legend Arrangement

Page 45: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Linear-Legend Arrangement

– Symbols placed adjacent to one another– Vertical or horizontal orientation

More = HigherMore logical ordering of

ranges

Page 46: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Linear-Legend Arrangement (cont.)

– Symbols placed adjacent to one another– Vertical or horizontal orientation

Illogical ordering of ranges

Values progress like on a number line

Page 47: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Nested-Legend Arrangement

– Smaller symbols drawn within larger– Requires less available space than linear

More = Higher Less logical ordering of

ranges

More logical ordering of

ranges

Page 48: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Placement of legend definitions

Within Symbols

Adjacent with Leader Lines

Adjacent to Symbols

Page 49: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Which representative symbols should

be included?• Range-Graded Scaling

– One for each class– Easy visual discrimination

Page 50: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Which representative symbols should

be included? (cont.)• Mathematical or Perceptual Scaling

– Largest, smallest, and intermediate– Easy visual discrimination

Alternatively, include symbols that are similar in size to the most common sizes on the mapped area

Page 51: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Nested-legend used to differentiate

between increase and decrease

Page 52: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LABELING PROPORTIONAL

SYMBOLS

Page 53: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LABELING SYMBOLS• Proportional symbols should be labeled

as ordinary point symbols– According to the guidelines presented in

the Typography lecture

Sequence ofPreferred Locations

Page 54: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

TIPS FOR LABELING AREAS

Page 55: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

• Default labeling style

LABELING AREAS

Page 56: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LABELING AREAS• Convert to upper case

UCase([STATE_NAME])

Page 57: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LABELING AREAS• Exaggerate letter/word spacing

Page 58: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LABELING AREAS• Screen back (it’s base information)

(Water labels should be

100% Cyan)

Page 59: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

TIP FOR FILTERING LABELS

Page 60: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

• Use VBScript in label expression– To show only certain labels

FILTERING LABELS

Function FindLabel ([CNTRYNAME]) if ([CNTRYNAME] = "France" OR [CNTRYNAME] = "Italy") then FindLabel = Ucase([CNTRYNAME]) end ifEnd Function

Page 61: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

• Use VBScript in label expression– To hide certain labels

FILTERING LABELS

Function FindLabel ([CNTRYNAME]) if ([CNTRYNAME] <> "France") then FindLabel = Ucase([CNTRYNAME]) end ifEnd Function

Page 62: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

TIPS FOR FILTERING FEATURES

Page 63: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

• All cities

FILTERING FEATURES

Page 64: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

• Belgian cities

FILTERING FEATURES

Page 65: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

• Large Belgian cities

FILTERING FEATURES

Page 66: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

• Large Belgian and large Dutch cities

FILTERING FEATURES

Page 67: PROPORTIONAL SYMBOL MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PROPORTIONAL SYMBOLMAPPING

Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340)Prof. Hugh HowardAmerican River College