Antireflection Property of a Periodic Nanocone Structured ...
Property services periodic review M15
-
Upload
sodexoperformance -
Category
Documents
-
view
230 -
download
8
description
Transcript of Property services periodic review M15
1 | P a g e
Property Services Review
M15 – P04
Trevor Peel - Sodexo
2 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Table of Contents
1. Activity Page 4
1.1. Overview Page 4
1.2. Site Page 5
1.3. RBM Page 5
1.4. Site Page 5
1.5. Supplier Page 5
1.6. Repair Type Page 6
1.7. Recall Page 11
2. Avoidable Calls Page 12
2.1. Repair Type Page 12
2.2. Code Page 12
2.3. ABM Page 13
3. Site Review Page 14
4. Highlights and lowlights Page 18
5. KPI Review Page 19
6. Summary-KPI effectiveness Page 22
Appendices
ABM Trackers
3 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Insight Pack Review
This periodic review has been in circulation for 6 months now and has evolved over time with your input and
our further understanding of your business needs.
We have moved from a Supplier focused arena to an ABM focal point, which in turn has tweaked the direction
and purpose of the review.
This Review will continually evolve with your feedback and input, so please pass on as I want this to be working
document providing a benefit to your business.
In its current form, the pack varies from audience to audience, from ABM to Supplier, to Brand to RBM. It
would be more beneficial to have chapters focused on one audience and therefore, have greater impact on a
specific area. If I could have your feedback on this to ensure we are all happy with the way forward?
The chart demonstrates the intention of this review pack, to
enable the business to Decrease Volume, Decrease Cost whilst
increasing Performance Levels.
4 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
1. Activity
1.1 Overview
Over 14,173 16,222 Work Orders have been generated in Period 4 of FY 15 (12.5% decrease from Period 3).
Period 4 encompassed orders that included the last 10 days of December which as reflected in the significant
decrease from Period 3. The post-Christmas increase has not been as dramatic as forecast but I am expecting a
15% increase in Period 5 based on previous years activity.
FY15 has accumulated 61,959 orders and when measured against the 48,224 budgeted orders to date we can
see a site view is required to highlight those with the most predominant issues.
This site review is highlighted in Chapter 3
P1 SLA activity is at a FY total of 17.15% and we have started to recover from the Week 13 of 27%, this measure
should only be tracked as reference and not used predominantly as a measure of supplier performance. If the
site requests an emergency call, and the ABM approves this, we cannot judge the suppliers on the high P1 rate.
We need to look in the behaviour of the sites and review their actions on emergency call outs.
1.2 ABM
The YTD Activity by ABM is following trend yet again with Simon Prudames being the model to follow, showing
high site levels with below average volumes. The top end of the scale has Nigel Lyons in the South East, which
as expected has high volumes and with WS Wright being the second highest Supplier by volume operating in this
region it shows a reasonable return.
YTD Volume No. of Sites per
ABM
Orders By Site Orders by Site /
Period Ave
Nigel Lyons 3,828 85 45.04 11.26
Joe Fryde 3,660 83 44.10 11.02
Martin Jarrett 3,346 84 39.83 9.96
John Hothersall 3,230 79 40.89 10.22
David Jones 3,174 81 39.19 9.80
Simon Clayton 3,149 80 39.36 9.84
Chris Pye 3,141 82 38.30 9.58
Hugh Phillips 3,107 78 39.83 9.96
David Osborne 3,025 79 38.29 9.57
Shemmen Ellis 3,021 80 37.76 9.44
Stephen Jones 3,010 73 41.23 10.31
Jack Robson 2,999 80 37.49 9.37
Rob Cant 2,992 78 38.36 9.59
Thomas Wynn 2,966 80 37.08 9.27
Andy Miller 2,844 75 37.92 9.48
Simon Prudames 2,740 82 33.41 8.35
Clare Dickson 2,517 77 32.69 8.17
Tom Mills 2,453 73 33.60 8.40
Neil Pollard 2,422 68 35.62 8.90
Mitchell Thompson 2,267 73 31.05 7.76
No ABM 7 2 3.50 0.88
YTD Ave 2,852 75 36.41 9.10
5 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
1.3 RBM
The above Call Outs reviewed by RBM show those with percentage of calls over target. When aligned with the
number of sites and the number of calls that were targeted, an area of focus becomes clear. The same names
are appearing Period on Period within this segment of the review.
1.4 Site
The following table shows the sites with the highest percentage over target of orders for Period 4.
This is extended on in Chapter 3
1.5 Supplier
The above table are the top 10 suppliers and their total orders YTD.
Business Unit 3 Business Unit 2 No of Sites per RBM Calls Target Calls Target =/- P1 P1 %
Jon Falarczyk Sizzling Oak Tree & ONeills 17 708 408 163 42% 78 11%
Lisa Gunn Toby Carvery 7 462 280 76 39% 83 18%
Matt Howcroft Ember Inns 12 462 288 101 38% 65 14%
Jeanette Quinn Sizzling Oak Tree & ONeills 17 620 408 148 34% 124 20%
Amy Gannon Ember Inns 13 473 312 102 34% 79 17%
Ian Collins Castle 13 627 416 141 34% 109 17%
Paul Joseph Ember Inns 13 470 312 106 34% 60 13%
Rob Goodier Toby Carvery 17 1,023 680 79 34% 168 16%
Paul Smith Premium Country Pubs 14 671 448 143 33% 90 13%
Sarah Pibworth Harvester 14 824 560 200 32% 130 16%
Location Description Current Period Volume Target % Over Target
ONEILLS WARDOUR STREET LONDO 48 6 88%
RHYDYCAR HARVESTER 33 10 70%
BROWNS VICTORIA 29 12 59%
FOUNTAIN MILTON KEYNES 29 10 66%
TOBY CARVERY BURNT TREE ISLAND 29 10 66%
ONEILLS EUSTON ROAD 28 6 79%
TOBY CARVERY SOUTHEND 27 10 63%
TOBY CARVERY STONEBRIDGE 27 10 63%
TOBY CARVERY HUDDERSFIELD 26 10 62%
SARN PARK BRIDGEND 26 10 62%
Workorder Count M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04 Average Total
Hobart 1,993 1,667 1,721 1,453 1,709 6,834
WS Wright Limited 1,316 1,245 1,254 880 1,174 4,695
Trios Property Ltd 921 649 757 793 780 3,120
Selwyn Building Services Ltd 654 711 707 630 676 2,702
FMe Property Solutions Ltd 544 896 633 623 674 2,696
Marren 609 752 700 602 666 2,663
GB Refrigeration Ltd 722 655 542 487 602 2,406
Flowrite 830 512 648 364 589 2,354
Three Nations Ltd 550 552 527 518 537 2,147
Alpha Maintenance & Building Ltd 549 499 543 549 535 2,140
6 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
These were reviewed in the previous edition of the Insight Pack and the repeat Suppliers appear each period.
The expected suspects are here and we do not expect this to change due to the Category and Region range.
1.6 Repair Type
The below tables highlight the top repair types under each category in Period 4.
Audio Visual
Building Repairs
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Av-Sound 77 £20,273.50 119 £20,411.50 117 £22,217.45 143 £25,401.31 456 £88,303.76
Satellite/TV Aerial/Sky TV 25 £4,036.95 16 £2,902.09 31 £5,108.58 22 £4,636.43 94 £16,684.05
Av-Visual 22 £7,278.90 31 £10,160.97 21 £13,562.55 18 £6,218.00 92 £37,220.42
Av-Lighting 1 £120.00 2 £1,052.95 3 £1,172.95
Total 124 31,589.35 167 33,594.56 171 41,941.53 183 36,255.74 645 143,381.18
YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
£3
1,5
89
£3
3,5
95
41
,94
1.5
3
36
,25
5.7
4
124
167 171183
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
£0
£5,000
£10,000
£15,000
£20,000
£25,000
£30,000
£35,000
£40,000
£45,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Building Repairs-Internal 2,254 £323,336.56 2,213 £366,805.51 2,213 £433,642.77 1,621 £222,155.14 8,301 £1,345,939.98
Sanitary Fitting Not Blocked 473 £51,353.13 366 £35,986.42 370 £39,453.71 396 £36,607.66 1,605 £163,400.92
Building Repairs-External 210 £81,086.78 173 £99,120.66 202 £127,681.16 168 £45,023.55 753 £352,912.15
Roof Repair 69 £23,639.96 65 £28,869.60 98 £27,422.48 73 £15,825.17 305 £95,757.21
Floor Covering 77 £59,472.64 61 £28,539.48 58 £21,127.99 61 £15,629.48 257 £124,769.59
Cold Water Supply - Internal 63 £5,041.07 52 £12,104.31 56 £6,197.77 62 £6,571.21 233 £29,914.36
Furniture - Loose 59 £72,022.57 28 £30,810.03 69 £90,572.97 46 £56,449.37 202 £249,854.94
Glazing-Inc Boarding Up 34 £8,695.68 33 £11,726.92 49 £13,173.84 40 £6,118.65 156 £39,715.09
Signage Repair 20 £17,285.66 29 £18,032.34 20 £12,079.59 9 £5,442.12 78 £52,839.71
Boundaries + Fencing 27 £27,708.23 15 £7,990.08 18 £12,246.25 14 £12,212.88 74 £60,157.44
Other 46 £22,735.02 52 £19,675.53 79 £46,088.97 40 £29,543.28 217 £118,042.80
Total 3,332 692,377.3 3,087 659,660.88 3,232 829,687.5 2,530 451,578.51 12,181 2,633,304.19
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03
7 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Catering
Drainage
£6
92
,30
5
£6
59
,52
2
82
9,3
10
.85
45
1,5
78
.51
3,332
3,0873,232
2,530
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
£0
£100,000
£200,000
£300,000
£400,000
£500,000
£600,000
£700,000
£800,000
£900,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost
Dishw asher - Hobart 600 £230,052.60 530 £213,003.10 576 £181,871.54 529 £197,649.37 2,235 £822,576.61
Microw ave 391 £45,384.84 524 £60,094.47 492 £55,351.16 379 £45,576.94 1,786 £206,407.41
Oven Combi Ste/Conv - Hobart 444 £219,176.17 379 £221,543.25 333 £212,796.32 230 £125,647.99 1,386 £779,163.73
Coffee Machines 275 £129,535.56 357 £119,022.12 367 £114,970.05 372 £92,783.27 1,371 £456,311.00
Fryer 279 £94,497.36 218 £90,588.51 305 £103,493.51 252 £96,792.90 1,054 £385,372.28
Glassw ashers 273 £43,299.23 196 £31,016.55 150 £27,317.71 254 £37,360.40 873 £138,993.89
Alto Shaams 232 £99,656.48 199 £60,853.48 225 £95,429.41 194 £58,180.72 850 £314,120.09
Steamers - Hobart 247 £93,157.68 187 £82,312.17 198 £75,634.57 176 £66,841.88 808 £317,946.30
Mealstreams - Merrychef 199 £65,905.24 204 £70,491.30 193 £67,857.09 200 £92,648.16 796 £296,901.79
Charbroilers/Chargrills - Hobart 195 £87,128.56 189 £79,003.57 204 £111,695.80 170 £76,249.09 758 £354,077.02
Others 1,207 £441,778.97 954 £279,490.02 1,324 £373,417.46 943 £278,703.27 4,428 £1,373,389.72
Total 4,342 1,549,572.69 3,937 1,307,418.54 4,367 1,419,834.62 3,699 1,168,433.99 16,345 5,445,259.84
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03
£1
,54
9,5
73
£1
,30
7,4
19
1,4
20
,18
9.6
1
1,1
68
,43
3.9
9
4,342
3,937
4,367
3,699
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
£0
£200,000
£400,000
£600,000
£800,000
£1,000,000
£1,200,000
£1,400,000
£1,600,000
£1,800,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Drainage Blocked 718 £117,326.95 670 £103,429.28 729 £134,693.81 628 £91,477.68 2,745 £446,927.72
Total 718 117,326.95 670 103,429.28 729 134,693.81 628 91,477.68 2,745 446,927.72
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03
8 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Drinks Dispense
£1
17
,32
7
£1
03
,42
9
13
4,7
01
.69
91
,47
7.6
8
718670
729
628
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
£0
£20,000
£40,000
£60,000
£80,000
£100,000
£120,000
£140,000
£160,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Dispense Equipment 858 £86,313.12 894 £86,063.56 832 £84,321.37 795 £72,145.04 3,379 £328,843.09
Cooling Equipment 242 £53,365.96 206 £37,201.30 235 £40,704.19 187 £34,923.18 870 £166,194.63
Postage/Supply Only Items 105 £3,183.46 95 £2,952.15 122 £5,080.77 84 £4,557.28 406 £15,773.66
Gas Leak 42 £2,796.30 51 £4,121.45 40 £2,793.45 40 £2,795.05 173 £12,506.25
Cleaning Fault 9 £559.10 4 £262.45 8 £579.51 3 £236.70 24 £1,637.76
Top and Tail Requests 2 £7,197.93 2 £5,126.34 6 £18,327.70 10 £30,651.97
Quality of Product 1 £60.00 1 £60.00
Wine Cleaning 1 £75.45 1 £75.45
Total 1,258 153,415.87 1,253 135,787.25 1,244 151,882.44 1,109 114,657.25 4,864 555,742.81
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03
£1
53
,41
6
£1
35
,78
7
15
1,8
64
.64
11
4,6
57
.25
1,258 1,253 1,244
1,109
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
£0
£20,000
£40,000
£60,000
£80,000
£100,000
£120,000
£140,000
£160,000
£180,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
9 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Electrical
Mechanical
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Electrical 1,457 £238,553.53 1,527 £291,255.29 1,376 £245,276.17 1,273 £225,013.90 5,633 £1,000,098.89
Fire Alarm 81 £20,407.04 131 £36,157.61 116 £17,190.96 81 £14,048.07 409 £87,803.68
Emergency Lighting 15 £2,025.22 19 £3,399.70 11 £1,231.94 8 £1,695.62 53 £8,352.48
Fan Extract-Input 5 £1,425.53 14 £2,185.04 21 £6,940.93 13 £3,332.56 53 £13,884.06
Sump Pump 12 £3,495.30 12 £1,883.40 20 £3,754.23 7 £827.50 51 £9,960.43
Signage-Electrical 1 £76.00 4 £2,347.54 5 £1,565.86 1 £39.00 11 £4,028.40
Intercom-Not Bt 1 £93.63 1 £96.50 1 £93.63 3 £283.76
Total 1,572 266,076.25 1,707 337,228.58 1,550 276,056.59 1,384 245,050.28 6,213 1,124,411.7
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03£
26
6,0
76
£3
37
,22
9
27
5,8
05
.98
24
5,0
50
.28
1,572
1,707
1,550
1,384
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
£0
£50,000
£100,000
£150,000
£200,000
£250,000
£300,000
£350,000
£400,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Boilers-Heating 140 £55,031.03 205 £77,396.18 232 £86,256.89 234 £80,856.78 811 £299,540.88
Fan Extract-Kitchen Canopy 180 £91,893.78 237 £133,573.92 197 £121,128.74 182 £61,791.34 796 £408,387.78
Hot Water Supply 169 £56,526.93 212 £68,462.94 166 £50,210.77 159 £56,640.78 706 £231,841.42
Heating-Radiators 71 £20,305.75 149 £28,347.51 153 £27,184.78 141 £49,204.53 514 £125,042.57
Air Con-Comfort Cooling 52 £38,988.85 101 £58,964.14 55 £15,027.31 33 £12,285.40 241 £125,265.70
Gas Leak 33 £7,901.22 43 £7,053.71 34 £5,292.51 36 £7,177.75 146 £27,425.19
Gas Fire 17 £3,016.87 32 £5,939.55 48 £7,629.05 47 £17,955.71 144 £34,541.18
Fan Input Kitchen-Ducted 15 £9,438.80 23 £23,265.85 29 £6,104.22 12 £3,810.97 79 £42,619.84
Flue Fan And Canopy (Fireplace) 7 £3,837.71 17 £3,804.38 9 £4,933.23 11 £4,666.76 44 £17,242.08
Chimney Flue Fan (Solid Fuel) 3 £2,852.38 16 £2,141.74 12 £6,627.31 12 £2,288.21 43 £13,909.64
Others 32 £11,388.70 39 £19,282.86 27 £22,448.25 18 £13,837.59 116 £66,957.40
Total 719 301,182.02 1,074 428,232.78 962 352,843.06 885 310,515.82 3,640 1,392,773.68
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03
£3
01
,18
2
£4
28
,23
3
35
3,3
34
.24
31
0,5
15
.82
719
1,074
962
885
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
£0
£50,000
£100,000
£150,000
£200,000
£250,000
£300,000
£350,000
£400,000
£450,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
10 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Refrigeration
Security
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Fridges + Freezers 1,397 £143,502.74 1,152 £124,117.38 1,145 £138,883.59 759 £97,485.46 4,453 £503,989.17
Walk In Fridges + Freezers 451 £133,868.53 379 £113,102.76 388 £108,067.57 346 £89,973.76 1,564 £445,012.62
Ice Machines 360 £64,789.58 358 £135,389.02 374 £76,683.95 311 £63,210.80 1,403 £340,073.35
Bottle Fridge/Cooler 256 £33,425.01 233 £40,977.07 284 £45,902.40 174 £30,758.15 947 £151,062.63
Cellar Cooling 175 £54,517.90 132 £48,634.31 115 £37,280.74 76 £14,853.75 498 £155,286.70
New Refrigeration Equipment 150 £176,614.18 110 £126,369.24 104 £122,700.42 54 £58,990.26 418 £484,674.10
Door Seals 5 £354.78 101 £5,809.59 111 £8,369.36 120 £6,682.13 337 £21,215.86
Salad Carts - Refrigerated 62 £23,269.26 49 £7,270.82 60 £15,669.40 39 £29,536.83 210 £75,746.31
Total 2,856 630,341.98 2,514 601,670.19 2,581 553,557.43 1,879 391,491.14 9,830 2,177,060.74
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03£
63
0,3
42
£6
01
,67
0
55
3,6
61
.43
39
1,4
91
.14
2,856
2,514 2,581
1,879
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
£0
£100,000
£200,000
£300,000
£400,000
£500,000
£600,000
£700,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Cctv Repairs 251 £115,526.26 170 £63,348.37 140 £53,867.52 134 £68,345.86 695 £301,088.01
Fire Extinguisher/Fire Blanket 31 £2,960.87 80 £6,587.11 62 £4,870.74 31 £2,608.95 204 £17,027.67
Safes 26 £6,707.53 29 £5,705.26 34 £6,223.91 38 £6,108.46 127 £24,745.16
Lock Problems - non safe related. 19 £3,990.95 19 £3,179.21 20 £3,071.88 23 £3,410.02 81 £13,652.06
Total 327 129,185.61 298 78,819.95 256 68,034.05 226 80,473.29 1,107 356,512.9
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03
£1
29
,18
6
£7
8,8
20
68
,03
4.0
5
80
,47
3.2
9
327
298
256
226
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
£0
£20,000
£40,000
£60,000
£80,000
£100,000
£120,000
£140,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
11 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Specialist
1.7 Recalls
The Recall Nature of Call is to be utilised when a maintained asset fails within 14 days of completion. It is
frequent for an order to be logged as a recall, but on engineer arrival, a different asset needs to be maintained
and therefore this recall can have a charge assigned.
The Suppliers with the most frequent ‘true’ recalls for Period 4 are listed below:
Four suppliers breach the 3% target, with Swallow, again, having a high Recall % against the Total Orders.
Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder Count Total Cost Workorder CountTotal Cost
Intruder Alarms 337 £38,535.71 352 £41,612.32 358 £33,530.00 257 £20,548.11 1,304 £134,226.14
Lifts/Hoists 61 £15,918.80 109 £17,439.25 92 £26,816.32 108 £27,121.85 370 £87,296.22
Pest Associated Work 99 £45,588.94 112 £50,215.18 110 £43,510.29 37 £15,781.94 358 £155,096.35
Sew age Treatment Pumps-Stations 25 £23,817.67 20 £12,122.12 23 £28,811.33 77 £56,320.48 145 £121,071.60
Jumbrella Repairs 13 £7,866.95 15 £5,332.00 16 £7,684.89 16 £11,626.28 60 £32,510.12
Asbestos Surveys 9 £8,130.00 6 £16,807.00 6 £4,130.00 5 £2,030.00 26 £31,097.00
Barrel/Cellar Hoist/Stillage Forklif t 8 £2,112.53 3 £1,023.73 14 £3,521.48 25 £6,657.74
Fire Supression System 2 £355.03 10 £9,706.58 4 £3,285.17 2 £143.32 18 £13,490.10
Landscape/Gardening 2 £910.00 1 £575.00 11 £12,875.00 14 £14,360.00
Keg Miser 2 £268.00 4 £495.00 2 £288.00 8 £1,051.00
Total 556 143,235.63 630 155,101.18 624 161,138 518 137,381.46 2,328 596,856.27
M15 - P04 YTD Count YTD ValueM15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03
£1
43
,23
6
£1
55
,10
1
16
1,1
38
13
7,3
81
.46
556
630 624
518
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
£0
£20,000
£40,000
£60,000
£80,000
£100,000
£120,000
£140,000
£160,000
£180,000
M15 - P01 M15 - P02 M15 - P03 M15 - P04
Total Cost Workorder Count
Supplier Name Recall Count % of Reactive Orders KPI Target
Swallow Lift Maintenance Ltd 5 7.69% 3.00%
City Refrigeration (UK) Ltd. 8 6.78% 3.00%
Hobart 60 4.13% 3.00%
Barnsley Catering 2 2.74% 3.00%
Mitie Technical Facilities Management Ltd (SO) 1 2.56% 3.00%
CSS Environmental Ltd 6 2.46% 3.00%
Cold Service Limited 8 1.92% 3.00%
Carford Group Limited 6 1.83% 3.00%
Winterhalter 4 1.52% 3.00%
Gratte 1 0.99% 3.00%
12 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
The Recalled Orders are to be removed from YTD stats in the hope this will place an emphasis on the Suppliers.
If an order has been deemed a success, but then recalled this success needs to be rectified as the maintenance
was not completed successfully.
2. Avoidable Calls
2.1 Repair Type
The following table shows those locations with the highest count of avoidable calls in Period 4.
The cost of Hobart Dishwasher Avoidable Calls continues to remain below £20K, but as always there is room for
improvement.
2.2 Code
Count Submitted
Cost
Count Submitted
Cost
Count Submitted
Cost
Count Submitted
Cost
Dishwasher - Hobart 30 £5,184.68 118 £14,023.08 148 £19,207.76
Glasswashers 21 £2,101.50 48 £5,485.96 4 £228.00 73 £7,815.46
Intruder Alarms 35 £2,321.16 5 £401.36 6 £695.00 46 £3,417.52
Oven Combi Ste/Conv - Hobart 17 £1,363.31 24 £820.00 41 £2,183.31
Microwave 30 £3,345.67 9 £542.07 1 £124.09 40 £4,011.83
Electrical 23 £2,711.22 1 £139.00 2 £42.00 7 £676.00 33 £3,568.22
Charbroilers/Chargrills - Hobart 20 £2,889.37 12 £1,704.09 32 £4,593.46
Glasswashers - Hobart 14 £1,879.81 15 £1,800.00 29 £3,679.81
Steamers - Hobart 8 £440.00 13 £1,993.20 21 £2,433.20
Mealstreams - Merrychef 16 £2,145.02 1 £116.59 1 £114.00 18 £2,375.61
Current Period
Total Submitted
Cost
Operator Error Poor Housekeeping Aborted Visit Site Staff Damage Current
Period Total
Count
Current Period Total Count Current Period Total Submitted Cost
Operator Error 320 £35,157.68
Poor Housekeeping 303 £34,368.97
Aborted Visit 25 £1,537.00
Site Staff Damage 25 £2,734.59
Total 673 73,798.24
Operator Error and Poor
Housekeeping account for the
highest count of avoidable calls In
Period 4. 48% of orders were
logged under Operator Error and
45% under Poor Housekeeping.
This is in line with the trend for
avoidable calls within the previous
FY
13 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
2.3 ABM
We are losing less and less costs through Aborted visits, which indicates that Suppliers and Sites have increased
their communication lines.
We need to continue this initiative and encourage the communication between Suppliers and the Sites. This is
the only way we can have a successful and profitable estate.
Count Submitted
Cost
Count Submitted
Cost
Count Submitted
Cost
Count Submitted
Cost
Joe Fryde 2 £127.50 31 £3,130.52 13 £1,217.63 1 £114.00 47 £4,589.65
Nigel Lyons 2 £80.00 20 £2,087.30 22 £2,299.76 2 £204.00 46 £4,671.06
Simon Clayton 24 £2,653.83 18 £1,518.98 2 £208.73 44 £4,381.54
David Jones 2 £112.00 18 £2,146.57 20 £2,426.00 3 £445.78 43 £5,130.35
Shemmen Ellis 1 £40.00 11 £1,135.74 26 £3,481.96 38 £4,657.70
Simon Prudames 21 £1,902.96 15 £1,436.48 2 £88.00 38 £3,427.44
Stephen Jones 13 £1,524.09 22 £1,884.14 3 £274.00 38 £3,682.23
Chris Pye 23 £2,281.08 12 £2,003.14 2 £282.50 37 £4,566.72
Rob Cant 1 £0.00 18 £1,648.93 14 £2,006.31 33 £3,655.24
David Osborne 17 £3,886.10 12 £1,261.54 3 £291.50 32 £5,439.14
Jack Robson 16 £2,320.43 15 £1,291.06 1 £88.40 32 £3,699.89
Thomas Wynn 15 £1,438.41 15 £1,816.01 2 £288.68 32 £3,543.10
Hugh Phillips 5 £385.50 5 £414.30 17 £2,488.46 3 £324.00 30 £3,612.26
Mitchell Thompson 16 £1,457.50 13 £1,561.55 29 £3,019.05
Tom Mills 11 £1,136.94 17 £1,266.48 28 £2,403.42
John Hothersall 5 £474.50 11 £1,261.99 9 £1,070.00 25 £2,806.49
Neil Pollard 3 £80.00 17 £1,779.95 5 £813.79 25 £2,673.74
Clare Dickson 7 £692.94 15 £2,547.35 22 £3,240.29
Andy Miller 1 £135.00 13 £1,266.90 6 £644.46 20 £2,046.36
Martin Jarrett 1 £49.50 6 £472.23 13 £870.78 20 £1,392.51
No ABM 1 £30.00 5 £347.97 3 £343.09 1 £125.00 10 £846.06
Matt Gannon 1 £23.00 2 £171.00 1 £120.00 4 £314.00
Total 25 1,537 320 35,157.68 303 34,368.97 25 2,734.59 673 73,798.24
Aborted Visit Operator Error Poor Housekeeping Site Staff DamageCurrent Period
Total Count
Current Period Total
Submitted Cost
14 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
3. Site Review
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10Week 11Week 12Week 13Week 14Week 15Week 16
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
Week 11
Week 12
Week 13
Week 14
Week 15
Week 16
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4
Repair Type Count
Building Repairs-Internal 80
Electrical 70
Drainage Blocked 47
Dishwasher - Hobart 42
Dispense Equipment 40
Boilers-Heating 25
Sanitary Fitting Not Blocked 23
The Estate view of activity
highlights the trends
throughout the year. With the
exception of the festive period
we can see that the 4,000
orders a week benchmark
accurate. This relates to 2.5
orders a week for each site.
It’s plain to see that while
Christmas was the quietest
reactively, 27% of the Orders
were regarded as an
emergency. This is a 12%
increase on the FY14 weekly
average of 15%. Whilst we
want as little disruption to our
customer of this period, we
need put a plan in place to
prevent these high level
emergency orders
Emergency Activity
Total Activity
54% of the Emergency Orders within Week 13 were due to
the Repair Types highlighted in the table shown.
15 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
Top Calling Sites
Rocket Euston Road is in the top 10 for reactive demand but has the lowest total sales for the same period. The
majority of orders were for various internal repairs, mostly logged in P02. There were 13 orders logged for
blocked drainage, indicating a consistent problem with this site.
20% of reactive orders YTD at the Crown Inn Bristol were problems with various internal and external lights as
well as issues with various sockets and outlets not working. This could indicate a wider problem with electrics at
this site.
Fountain Milton Keynes has 123 orders YTD evenly spread across periods. 14% of these orders were for issues
with 3 different Fridges and Freezers all logged between Period 1 and Period 4. 8% of orders were logged for
faults to the Fan Extract Kitchen Canopy, of which the majority of the orders were related to the fan blowing
cold air.
Highest P1 Demand:
The Cock and Magpies has the highest percentage of P1 orders in M15 with 57% of their reactive works classed
as emergency. Of the 27 P1 jobs, 26% were under Fan Extract-Kitchen Canopy due to gas supply and extract fan
faults.
21% of the 14 P1 orders at the Crown and Anchor West Bromwich were also due to gas supply and fan faults to
the Kitchen Extract Canopy.
31% of the 16 P1 faults at Three Horse Shows Sheldon were various problems with blocked drains over the past
4 periods.
Top 10 Locations for YTD P01 P02 P03 P04 Total YTD Total Sales YTD
ONEILLS WARDOUR STREET LONDO 36 43 67 54 208 2,156,959.90£
FOUNTAIN MILTON KEYNES 31 29 26 36 123 545,756.88£
TOBY CARVERY MARTELLO INN 37 20 38 19 118 561,003.83£
BROWNS COVENT GARDEN 39 22 28 25 116 1,838,795.23£
TOBY CARVERY EXETER 40 24 19 30 112 748,620.74£
CROWN INN BRISTOL 17 33 29 29 110 481,854.75£
DURLEY INN BOURNEMOUTH 20 24 39 21 106 449,416.93£
TOBY CARVERY SOUTHEND 21 29 25 31 106 558,277.39£
SARN PARK BRIDGEND 37 26 20 23 106 650,235.16£
ROCKET EUSTON RD LONDON NW1 29 40 14 22 104 438,729.34£
Sites with largest % of P1 YTD Total P1 Total All YTD % P1
COCK & MAGPIES BIRMINGHAM 27 47 57%
CROWN & ANCHOR WEST BROMWICH 14 26 54%
THREE HORSE SHOES SHELDON 16 30 53%
TWO BROTHERS SOUTHAMPTON 19 36 53%
MEADOWPARK HOTEL STIRLING VI 15 29 52%
DOG & GUN WOLVERHAMPTON 11 22 50%
DRUM TORQUAY 6 13 46%
ST JOHN'S - CARDIFF 29 63 46%
WILDWOOD STAFFORD 19 42 45%
PLOUGH INN KILLINGWORTH VILLAG 14 31 45%
16 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
26% of P1 faults at the Two Brothers Southampton were due to drainage issues over the past 4 periods.
21% of the P1 faults at Wildwood Stafford were due to faults to a walk-in freezer.
Sites Over Target
The above locations are those with the highest count of orders YTD over the target thresholds. Some locations
are busier and are expected to feature, for example ONeill’s Wardour St. However, sites like ONeill’s Solihull and
While Lion Ambleside have a lower percentage of the total reactive demand.
White Lion Ambleside’s demand has spiked in both P02 and P04 with 33 and 26 orders raised respectively. 31%
of these orders YTD are for Internal Building Repairs. 16 of the 28 orders raised in M15 have been with regards
to blocked drainage, leaks, or faulty waste pipes.
ONeill’s Solihull’s demand spiked in Period 2 and 3 with 39 and 25 orders respectively. 19% of these orders were
for Fridge and Freezer Faults.
Sites with the largest over budget YTD
Count over
Target Total YTD
% Over
Target
% of Reactive
Total
ONEILLS WARDOUR STREET LONDO 176 208 85% 0.34%
FOUNTAIN MILTON KEYNES 83 123 67% 0.20%
ROCKET EUSTON RD LONDON NW1 80 104 77% 0.17%
TOBY CARVERY MARTELLO INN 78 118 66% 0.19%
ONEILLS EUSTON ROAD 76 100 76% 0.16%
TOBY CARVERY EXETER 72 112 64% 0.18%
CROWN INN BRISTOL 70 110 64% 0.18%
WHITE LION AMBLESIDE 69 93 74% 0.15%
BROWNS COVENT GARDEN 68 116 59% 0.19%
ONEILLS SOLIHULL 68 92 74% 0.15%
17 | P a g e
Reactive £ v Sales £
The above locations are those with the highest percentage of sales spent on reactive works in the same period. The highest is Crooked Billet Leigh on Sea with
recative works YTD accounting for 7.14% of their sales. Of the 42 orders at this location YTD, 57% of the total reactive spend YTD (£6,220) was spend to fix a
pitching roof. The Bolton Kensington spent nearly 6% of total sales on reactive works YTD. 30% of reactive spend was due to various roof repair (refelt flat roof and
leak). A further 18% of reactive spend was due to pest control, specifically a rodent problem.
49% of reactive spend YTD at the Bird in Hand Pontardulais were due to roof and chimney repairs.
The following are the sites with the highest sales and the lowest reactive spend. The sites above have all spent less than 1% of their sales YTD on reactive works. All
sites have no more than 28 orders logged YTD. While Brockwell Seam Northumberland has the lowest reactive demand with 9 orders YTD, the best performing are
Miller and Carter Oracle and Falcon Clapham Junction with a high total sales and only 24 and 26 reactive works YTD respectively.
Reactive £ Sales £ Reactive £ Sales £ Reactive £ Sales £ Reactive £ Sales £ Reactive £ Sales £
CROOKED BILLET LEIGH ON SEA 1,838.84£ 41,569.06£ 4,629.59£ 34,540.28£ 59.00£ 33,665.97£ 4,359.26£ 42,757.19£ 10,886.69£ 152,532.50£ 7.14%
MAN ON THE MOON WEST HEATH 791.04£ 53,927.67£ 1,289.90£ 53,789.37£ 3,496.15£ 57,453.65£ 9,472.54£ 70,014.71£ 15,049.63£ 235,185.40£ 6.40%
THE BOLTON KENSINGTON 954.42£ 61,966.32£ 205.00£ 33,775.27£ 5,791.70£ 42,637.57£ 3,034.83£ 37,638.12£ 9,985.95£ 176,017.28£ 5.67%
BIRD IN HAND PONTARDULAIS 3,783.81£ 32,273.18£ 869.12£ 34,682.28£ 1,379.11£ 32,312.59£ 1,876.61£ 42,954.40£ 7,908.65£ 142,222.45£ 5.56%
BOWLING GREEN INN CHORLEY 2,556.35£ 41,926.93£ 2,937.65£ 42,244.13£ 2,484.44£ 40,725.60£ 720.07£ 38,176.17£ 8,698.51£ 163,072.83£ 5.33%
ONE TRICK PONY CLUB 2,483.65£ 31,603.61£ 1,352.98£ 11,132.95£ 3,204.67£ 75,610.53£ 2,707.86£ 74,152.05£ 9,749.16£ 192,499.14£ 5.06%
BRAUNTON INN 1,659.71£ 46,728.86£ 5,925.46£ 44,924.68£ 616.99£ 38,007.30£ 877.00£ 51,665.47£ 9,079.16£ 181,326.31£ 5.01%
P1 P2 P3 P4 Total % YTD Reactive v
Sales
REACTIVE TC SALES TC REACTIVE TC SALES TC REACTIVE TC SALES TC REACTIVE TC SALES TC REACTIVE TC SALES TC
TENNENTS BYRES RD GLASGOW 93.63£ 97,937.26£ 226.87£ 97,768.45£ 120.00£ 100,294.67£ 731.99£ 88,711.80£ 1,172.49£ 384,712.18£ 0.30%
CENTURION LINCOL 178.00£ 80,394.82£ 371.75£ 78,235.20£ 302.93£ 92,179.21£ 298.69£ 96,287.13£ 1,151.37£ 347,096.36£ 0.33%
CROWN TAV CLERKENWELL GRN EC1 730.25£ 112,229.42£ 742.68£ 116,263.31£ -£ 174,488.54£ 116.00£ 74,701.69£ 1,588.93£ 477,682.96£ 0.33%
INN AT MAYBURY 252.60£ 110,966.68£ 181.98£ 107,951.19£ 828.96£ 125,234.85£ 433.38£ 128,581.89£ 1,696.92£ 472,734.61£ 0.36%
WALTON FOX BAMBER BRIDGE 194.38£ 67,459.15£ 397.27£ 65,110.08£ 332.19£ 75,676.65£ 100.00£ 71,986.35£ 1,023.84£ 280,232.23£ 0.37%
MILLER & CARTER ORACLE 846.84£ 179,613.20£ 745.48£ 199,610.39£ 888.64£ 254,990.65£ 738.75£ 197,372.45£ 3,219.71£ 831,586.69£ 0.39%
BROCKWELL SEAM NORTHUMBERLAND 88.00£ 64,817.67£ 174.28£ 66,903.04£ 213.00£ 69,485.13£ 657.66£ 87,355.15£ 1,132.94£ 288,560.99£ 0.39%
FALCON CLAPHAM JUNCTION SW11 569.34£ 138,027.51£ 650.35£ 166,642.10£ 587.69£ 175,674.46£ 603.69£ 127,106.78£ 2,411.07£ 607,450.85£ 0.40%
HUNTSMAN & HOUNDS UPMINSTER 483.20£ 71,004.13£ 309.78£ 70,869.62£ 141.47£ 78,738.31£ 478.54£ 76,940.92£ 1,412.99£ 297,552.98£ 0.47%
WINDLE BROOK BAGSHOT 312.41£ 89,731.67£ 1,189.72£ 91,984.11£ 180.00£ 87,144.97£ 60.00£ 92,518.86£ 1,742.13£ 361,379.61£ 0.48%
Total % YTD Reactive v
Sales
P1 P2 P3 P4
18 | P a g e
4. Highlights and Lowlights
As someone once said “Success has many parents but Failure is an Orphan”
We need to ensure our ABM’s and Suppliers alike focus on the areas that are not performing as they should and
we don’t ignore or except poor performance. We need to take action where appropriate whilst also celebrating
the successes.
LOWS:
HIGHS:
Mite: 13% of all orders have been
Chased twice
SEE Mechanical: 10% Overall Performance
Trios: 46% Electrical and
89% Mexhanical -
Variance
The Combined
Performance for the Estate
is 62%
SEE FY15 Average
Performance = 23%
The Lowest CSS score across the
Estate is 88%
Instances of 2nd to 3rd
Chase at an all time low
Building has increased from
50 to 80% in FY15
FY15 Period on Period
comparison with FY14
shows vast improvement
We are attending
orders in the quickest time in
over 3 years
19 | P a g e
5. KPI Review
Average Job Cost < £500
Average Job Cost > £500
CSS Average time to complete
Emergency Repair
Average time to complete a
Scheduled Repair
FTF rate % Attended within target
% Recalls % of 2nd chases/
Work Order Count
% of 3rd chases/
Work Order Count
% variance of agreed vs
claimed
Work Order Count
Weight 15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
Estate Total
Target <= £101 <= £1,466 >=97.5% <=1.5 <=2.2 >=80% >=90% <=1% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
M15 - P01 £ 115 £ 1,636 95% 2.43 2.29 76.1% 76.7% 1.4% 1% 1% -16%
15,538
M15 - P02 £ 115 £ 1,640 94% 2.52 5.92 75.4% 78.5% 1.5% 1% 0% -16%
14,991
M15 - P03 £ 115 £ 1,640 95% 2.46 5.24 75.3% 75.9% 1.5% 1% 0% -16%
14,991
M15 - P04 £ 118 £ 1,527 96% 1.70 2.04 75.8% 82.7% 1.4% 1% 0% 9%
12,766
Comparison M14 - P04 £ 125 £ 1,612 95% 1.66 2.03 76.9% 79.1% 1.8% 0% 0% 9%
13,543
(Recalls Removed) M15 YTD £ 118 £ 1,632 94.8% 2.02 1.99 76.3% 78.8% 0.0% 1% 0% 8%
58,286
If nothing else, the Suppliers are demonstrating a level of consistency in that Estimates and the time taken to complete orders are a fair distance from target.
I don’t believe either of the targets are unrealistic and so I will be contacting the suppliers to ensure they understand who these KPis are calculated and the effect they have
on the overall performance.
The YTD view shows encouraging signs of improvement throughout the estate with you can see a decrease as the Periods have progressed throughout the year.
20 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
When comparing the above to individual suppliers results it is clear that each category has both over and underperforming suppliers, there is no in-between.
Average Job Cost
< £500
Average Job Cost
> £500
Customer
Satisfaction
Average time to
complete
Emergency
Repair
Average time to
complete a
Scheduled
Repair
FTF rate % Attended
within target
% Recalls % of 2nd
chases/ Work
Order Count
% of 3rd chases/
Work Order
Count
% variance of
agreed vs
claimed
Work Order
Count
Monthly
Performance
Score
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £101 <= £1,466 >=97.5% <=1.5 <=2.2 >=80% >=90% <=1% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Building 95.50£ 1,319.32£ 97% 1.00 0.62 86.05% 78.40% 0.08% 1% 1% 14% 2,463 80%
101.00£ 1,466.00£ 97.5% 1.50 2.20 80.00% 90.00% 1.00% 3% 1% 5%
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £152 <= £1,697 >=97.5% <=1.5 <=3 >=71% >=90% <=3% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Catering 136.35£ 1,874.33£ 95% 2.62 -11.86 63.15% 81.86% 3.89% 1% 0% 8% 3,577 35%
152.00£ 1,697.00£ 97.5% 1.50 3.00 71.00% 90.00% 3.00% 3% 1% 5%
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £118 <= £1,020 >=97.5% <=1 <=3 >=90% >=90% <=2% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Drainage 117.21£ 928.94£ 99% 0.06 0.09 92.89% 91.43% 0.00% 0% 0% 27% 630 90%
118.00£ 1,020.00£ 97.5% 1.00 3.00 90.00% 90.00% 2.00% 3% 1% 5%
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £119 <= £961 >=97.5% <=1 <=3 >=80% >=90% <=2% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Electrical 123.63£ 923.50£ 99% 4.08 5.96 77.22% 85.51% 0% 1% 1% 8% 1,380 30%
119.00£ 961.00£ 97.5% 1.00 3.00 80.00% 90.00% 2.00% 3% 1% 5%
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £157 <= £1,481 >=97.5% <=1 <=3 >=80% >=90% <=2% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Mechanical 140.55£ 1,738.49£ 99% 2.08 4.41 71.83% 84.14% 0.00% 1% 1% 16% 889 35%
157.00£ 1,481.00£ 97.5% 1.00 3.00 80.00% 90.00% 2.00% 3% 1% 5%
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £103 <= £1,239 >=97.5% <=1 <=3 >=80% >=90% <=2% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Refrigeration 109.79£ 1,283.19£ 93% 1.69 1.90 72.76% 82.46% 1.51% 0% 0% 4% 1,853 35%
103.00£ 1,239.00£ 97.5% 1.00 3.00 80.00% 90.00% 2.00% 3% 1% 5%
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £91 <= £1,058 >=97.5% <=1 <=3 >=85% >=90% <=2% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Drinks Dispense 95.77£ 944.25£ 100% -2.81 -0.56 84.78% 92.53% 0.00% 0% 0% 9% 1,058 60%
91.00£ 1,058.00£ 97.5% 1.00 3.00 85.00% 90.00% 2.00% 3% 1% 5%
15% 10% 5% 15% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10%
<= £108 <= £1,320 >=97.5% <=1 <=3 >=80% >=90% <=1% <=3% <=1% +/-5%
Specialist 128.72£ 1,275.60£ 86% 0.05 1.19 79.77% 77.07% 1.73% 1% 0% 3% 519 55%
21 | P a g e Property Services Periodic Review
The category results show a mix bag of performance, from good, to bad to ugly. I have left in the negative times that have occurred through poor data entry from the
suppliers, but these will be removed for future KPi’s.
The Builders have shown the greatest increase in Performance over the last 12 months and they continue to shine under heavy demand. We have seen an upturn in the
variance KPi now we have only measure those orders over £500.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Period 1
Period 2
Period 3
Period 4
The trend over time some reasonable consistency with results,
but there are no regular underperformers which shows they
listen and adapt their behaviour where negative.
22 | P a g e
6. Summary – KPI Effectiveness
In order for a KPI to be effective the area of measure needs to have influence over the result. The
below KPI review shows the level of influence a Supplier has over these KPI’s and therefore
demonstrating how effective the KPI can be:
The KPis should be there to drive performance; the inclusion of the costs KPis devalues the matrix
in the eyes of the supplier as they know they have little influence over achieving a heavily
weighted KPi.
% Attended within
target
FTF rate Customer Satisfaction % of 2nd chases/
Work Order Count
% Recalls
Average time to
complete Emergency
Repair
Average time to
complete a scheduled
call
Average Job Cost <
£500
Average Job Cost >
£500
% variance of agreed
vs claimed
100% Influence
50% Influence – there
could be many blockers to
the success/failure of
these KPI’s that not in the
Suppliers control
0% Influence – If an ABM
approves a Work Order, the
Supplier needs to attend
and maintain. These KPI’s
should be tracked, but not
measured as they cannot be
controlled by the
organisations we are
measuring