Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING on Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence
Transcript of Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING on Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS, ESQ. SBN 147715LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS13240 Amargosa RoadVictorville, California 92392(760) 951-3663 Telephone(909) 382-9956 Facsimile
Attorney for Defendant ANTHONY J. MARTIN
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor in interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Including Any Assignors or Successors In Interest,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANTHONY J. MARTIN and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No.: 645068
(PROPOSED) ORDER AFTER HEARING ON DEFENDANT ANTHONY MARTIN’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ALL EVIDENCE
DATE: August 5, 2010TIME: 8:30 a.m.DEPT: D-22
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on August 5, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. in Department
D-22, Defendant Anthony J. Martin moved the court for an Order precluding all evidence.
Attorney Timothy L. McCandless appeared on behalf of Defendant Anthony J. Martin,
1_____________________________________________________________________________________
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ALL EVIDENCE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_________________________ appeared on behalf of Plaintiff US Bank, N.A.
The court having reviewed the moving papers and after oral argument granted
Defendant’s Motion in Limine.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Trustee’s Deed After Sale being offered by
the Plaintiff is inadmissible, is irrelevant and an insufficient evidentiary foundation exists for its
admission, and will not be admitted into evidence during trial of this matter.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED ___________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________.
DATED:___________________
________________________________JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
2_____________________________________________________________________________________
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ALL EVIDENCE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. My business address is ________________________, which is located in the county where the mailing described took place.
On April 11, 2023, I served the foregoing document(s) described: (PROPOSED) ORDER AFTER HEARING ON DEFENDANT ANTHONY MARTIN’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ADMISSION OF TRUSTEE’S DEED AFTER SALE which were served upon:
ATTORNEYS FOR U.S. BANK
John E. Bouzane, Esq.Law Offices of John E. Bouzane634 Oak CourtSan Bernardino, CA 92410
___ I deposited the foregoing documents in the Federal Express Mail (FedEx). Executed on:, in Victorville, California.
(State) XXXX I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.
(Federal) ____ I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.
_______ BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION I personally transmitted the aforementioned document by facsimile to the addressee. Executed August 3, 2010, in San Bernardino, California.
________________________________BERNIE KIMMERLE
3_____________________________________________________________________________________
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ALL EVIDENCE