Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING on Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence

5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS, ESQ. SBN 147715 LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS 13240 Amargosa Road Victorville, California 92392 (760) 951-3663 Telephone (909) 382-9956 Facsimile Attorney for Defendant ANTHONY J. MARTIN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor in interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Including Any Assignors or Successors In Interest, Plaintiff, vs. ANTHONY J. MARTIN and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 645068 (PROPOSED) ORDER AFTER HEARING ON DEFENDANT ANTHONY MARTIN’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ALL EVIDENCE DATE: August 5, 2010 TIME: 8:30 a.m. DEPT: D-22 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________ (PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ALL EVIDENCE

Transcript of Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING on Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence

Page 1: Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING on Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS, ESQ. SBN 147715LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS13240 Amargosa RoadVictorville, California 92392(760) 951-3663 Telephone(909) 382-9956 Facsimile

Attorney for Defendant ANTHONY J. MARTIN

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor in interest to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Including Any Assignors or Successors In Interest,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANTHONY J. MARTIN and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 645068

(PROPOSED) ORDER AFTER HEARING ON DEFENDANT ANTHONY MARTIN’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ALL EVIDENCE

DATE: August 5, 2010TIME: 8:30 a.m.DEPT: D-22

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on August 5, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. in Department

D-22, Defendant Anthony J. Martin moved the court for an Order precluding all evidence.

Attorney Timothy L. McCandless appeared on behalf of Defendant Anthony J. Martin,

1_____________________________________________________________________________________

(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ALL EVIDENCE

Page 2: Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING on Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_________________________ appeared on behalf of Plaintiff US Bank, N.A.

The court having reviewed the moving papers and after oral argument granted

Defendant’s Motion in Limine.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Trustee’s Deed After Sale being offered by

the Plaintiff is inadmissible, is irrelevant and an insufficient evidentiary foundation exists for its

admission, and will not be admitted into evidence during trial of this matter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED ___________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________.

DATED:___________________

________________________________JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

2_____________________________________________________________________________________

(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ALL EVIDENCE

Page 3: Prop Proposed ORDER AFTER HEARING on Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. My business address is ________________________, which is located in the county where the mailing described took place.

On April 11, 2023, I served the foregoing document(s) described: (PROPOSED) ORDER AFTER HEARING ON DEFENDANT ANTHONY MARTIN’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ADMISSION OF TRUSTEE’S DEED AFTER SALE which were served upon:

ATTORNEYS FOR U.S. BANK

John E. Bouzane, Esq.Law Offices of John E. Bouzane634 Oak CourtSan Bernardino, CA 92410

___ I deposited the foregoing documents in the Federal Express Mail (FedEx). Executed on:, in Victorville, California.

(State) XXXX I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.

(Federal) ____ I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

_______ BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION I personally transmitted the aforementioned document by facsimile to the addressee. Executed August 3, 2010, in San Bernardino, California.

________________________________BERNIE KIMMERLE

3_____________________________________________________________________________________

(PROPOSED) ORDER ON HEARING AFTER DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ALL EVIDENCE