Project Report
-
Upload
1511simran -
Category
Documents
-
view
91 -
download
1
Transcript of Project Report
1
Overview of the organization
ABOUT THE COMPANY :-
Paras Pharmaceuticals Limited is one of the India’s leading company with
household brands in the Healthcare & Personal care space. We have over four
decades of experience and a series of successful brand launches.
The innovative nature of our products have gained wide acceptance
beyond national boundaries. Paras is known for developing new categories and
are widely respected for its category creation ability. As a result, we have one
super brand in pain management and we are market leaders in at least two other
healthcare categories.
As a corporate we believe in providing innovative solutions to everyday
health & personal care problems and have an entrepreneurial culture to build
categories and brands. In Indian scenario Paras has 2 manufacturing plants, 1
Central warehouse, 5 Zonal Office, 1800 Distributors, 6000 wholesalers,
10,00,000 outlets reach (Direct+ Indirect).
PARAS BELIEF:-
Insights, Innovations and Inspirations.
2
GLOBALISED PARAS:-
Paras products are touching lives of people in more than 45 nations
worldwide including:
Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Maldives, Kenya, Singapore, Myanmar,
Ukraine, Panama, West Indies, UAE, and Australia. Thus Paras Network is
operating at a global level.
PARAS PHARMA –MILESTONE:-
In 1960 : Radiant Pharmaceuticals-manufactures Liquid Doses.
In 1965 : Paras Pharmaceuticals (small scale) at Sambalpur (Orissa)-
Manufactures Tablets, Liquids and Capsule.
In 1980 : Paras Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. at Kalol.
In 1996 : Today’s Paras Pharmaceuticals Ltd.-
Development and formulation of all products.
3
BRAND HISTORY :-
1. STOPACHE TABLET- 1966
2. MOOV CREAM- 1984
3. KRACK SR CREAM- 1993
4. BOROSOFT CREAM- 1996
5. STOPACHE CREAM BALM- 1997
6. WINTER SHIELD CREAM- 1998
7. ITCH GUARD CREAM- 1998
8. RING GUARD CREAM- 1998
9. D’COLD-LIGHT AND TOTAL TABLETS- 1998
10. ITCH GUARD DERMICOOL PRICKLY HEAT POWDER- 1998.
MANUFACTURING LOCATIONS :-
Manufacturing Units:
1. Paras Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
P.O.Kalol, Distt. Ahmedabaad, Mehsaana Highway North Gujarat,
India.
4
2. World Class Manufacturing
Unit :(C.U.S, F.D.A, G.M.P. Certification)
Paras Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
P.O Baddi, Distt.Solan-173205 Himachal Pradesh,India.
CORE VALUES AT PARAS :-
1.SKILL
2.SYSTEM
3.STYLE
4.SPEED
5.FOCUS on current trend and young generation.
6.EMPOWERING Employees, Enrich, Excel
7.COMPETENCE BUILDING.
8.ADAPTABILITY TO NEW ENVIRONMENT
9.RESPECT HUMAN VALUES.
5
PARAS AIMS AT :-
Serving people with value added products.
Not just cosmetics makeovers also to create Healthy new products
categories.
To create paras as a reliable and favored name amongst the masses.
AT PARAS :-
OUR BELIEF : Possibilities.
OUR CULTURE : I Ideas in Action.
OUR VISION : Solutions for better living.
OUR MANTRA : Insight, Innovation, Inspiration.
OUR SPECIALITY : Building Brands, Winning Trust.
6
PRODUCTS AT PARAS :-
DERMICOOL : Thanda raho thanda socho.
ITCHGUARD : Active Life Ka Saathi.
KRACK : Ediyaan Banaye Soft,Rakhe Soft.
LIVON : Baalon Ka Rakshak.
RECOVA : The science of beautiful skin.
RING GUARD : Daad Ka Kaam Tamaam.
STOPACHE : Sab Dardon Ki Ek Dava.
7
8
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Absence may be authorized or unauthorized caused by circumstances
beyond one's control. Absenteeism has been variously defined by different
authorities.
According to Webster's Dictionary "absenteeism is the practice or habit of
being an "absentee,' and an 'absentee' is one who habitually stays away,"
According to Labor Bureau, Shimla, "absenteeism is the total man shift
because of absences as a percentage of the total number of man shifts
scheduled to work.”
Absenteeism is said to be there when an employee fails to come to work
when he is scheduled to work. Excessive absenteeism involves a considerable
loss to the enterprise because work scheduled are upset and delayed, and has to
give overtime wages to meet the delivery dates, the rates of overtime wages are
double than the normal rates of wages.
The absence of a foreman or Supervisor leads to dislocation of work and
indiscipline hands leads to a great loss in. The absence of trained production as
well as to breakage in machines and this has its repercussions on many other
workers and sections of the factory.
Not only do absenteeism and turnover, leads to wastage or breakage, the
cost of breakage and time spent are also important factors.
Absenteeism and labor turnover are related phenomena and most often,
they go side by side. Usually, a person who remain absent in most of the cases
though not always leave the job. Absenteeism and labor turnover related, the
factors related to them are the same.
9
Workers remain absent from regular work due to hard nature of jobs,
monotony in work and personal reason. This leads to absenteeism. It is normal
and natural tendency among factory workers absenteeism has been vigorously
defined by different authorities. According to Webster’s dictionary absenteeism is
the practice or habits of being absentee and an absentee is one who habitually is
a total no. of shifts scheduled to work. In other word it signifies the absence
employee from work when he is scheduled to be at work it is unauthorized un-
explained the rate of absenteeism two factors are taken into consideration. The
number of persons scheduled to work and number of persons actually present.
A worker who reports for any part of shift is to be considered present. An
employer is considered to be scheduled to work when the employer has work
available and the employee is aware of it and when the employer has no reason
to expect. Well in advance that the employee may stay away from work if he has
taken leave to which he is entitled or on ground or some accident or without any
previous sanction of level. This absence may be authorized or un-authorized or
caused by circumstances beyond one’s control.
2.2 FEATURES
Following are the features of absenteeism:
a) The day before and after holidays are liable to have high rate of
absenteeism.
b) The rate of absenteeism is lowest on pay day.
c) Women are absent more often than men.
d) Absenteeism is generally high among workers below 25 years of age.
e) Operative employees are absent more frequently than there supervisor.
10
f) Percentage of absenteeism is generally higher in the night shift than in the
day shift.
g) Bad weather increases absenteeism, especially among employees who
live at distant places.
Absenteeism in Indian industry is not a new phenomenon. The Royal
Commission on labour reported that high absenteeism prevails among industrial
labour mainly due to their rural orientation. Since then number of individual
researchers have pointed out that absenteeism is higher in mines and it is higher
in northern India than in southern India.
2.3 CAUSES
The causes of absenteeism may broadly be divided into following three
categories:
(I) In-plant Causes
(II) Community and Social Causes
(III) Personal Causes
I. In-plant Causes
a) Working Conditions
Poor working condition affect the workers health adversely. He may
be tired of working environment and thus may remain away from work
without any notice to employer.
11
b) Nature of Work
When work is though monotonous in nature, the workers get tired
physically and mentally. So he frequently remains absent without
information to employer.
c) Absence of regular leave arrangements
Every worker requires at last 15 to 20 days leave in a year for his
personal work. The employer should arrange leave to all workers.
However, in many factories workers are not given any intimation to
the employer. Thus, absences of regular arrangement led to absenteeism.
d) Maladjustment at workplace
When a skilled worker is absent from his job then a new worker is
to be appointed in his place who might not be so skilled in that job. So this
creates more burden for the new workers because he has to taken care of
his own job and also the new work.
e) Night Shift
Due to inappropriate night timings, lack of transportation facility at
night and some domestic reasons, the worker are not able to attend the
night shifts.
f) Frustration
Due to wrong placement, lack of encouragement or promotion
opportunities frustrated workers do not enjoy attending his work regularly
there by resulting in absenteeism.
12
II. Community and Social Causes
a) Absence of transport facilities
Many factories are located away from city limits. Naturally, workers
have to travel long distances. In case of any disturbance in transport
system, workers are unable to reach place of work at proper time and they
have to remain absent. Thus, transport facilities leads to absenteeism.
b) Accidents
Industrial Accidents and occupational diseases bring about
absenteeism. Depending upon the nature of the process and machinery
used rick of accident can be more or less.
III. Personal Causes
a) Bad Habits and Social Evil
A no of workers in city are used to drinking; gambling; and other
bad habits. Such workers are unable to attend duties regularly due to such
bad habits.
b) Lack of Interest
Lack of interest and lack of feeling of responsibility are fundamental
causes of absenteeism. Thinking of mind caused by environmental and
13
sociological factors may lead to development of feeling of responsibility in
the mind of worker about the work.
c) Personal Problems
Due to some personal problem in the house or at workplace they
cannot concentrate on the job well and thus remains absent from work.
2.4 CONSEQUENCES
a) Reduces the efficiency
Absenteeism effect the efficiency of the workers. The workers who
join after the long period of absence would normally be much less
efficient.
b) Creates the indiscipline
The absentees effects the discipline of the workers adversely the
worker who is attending to his work irregularly may not care much for the
indiscipline.
c) Loss of Job
When a worker remains absent for more days so without informing
the employer then his name is cut out and is out of job. It causes bad
effect on both employer and employ.
14
d) Both quality and quantity are effected
If more number of workers are absent then total output is affected.
If alternative arrangement is made by employing casual workers who do
not posses adequate experience the quality goods produced is affected.
e) Indebtedness
When person remain more absent from work then for that holidays
wages are deducted, with few salary the family activities can be done for
then they have to borrow from others and this borrowing increases and
increases. The worker gets indebted in this and it is very difficult for them
to come out of this indebtedness.
f) Family Suffering
Due to absent from work the wages are deducted. The families
have to suffer due to this deduction because these days it is very difficult
to cope up with small salary.
g) Loss of self respect
Due to more absenteeism the workers loss his self respect in
organization, society and family.
h) Reduction of financial resources
Absenteeism causes instability in one’s carrier due to more
holidays from workplace the employ is out from his present job and has to
go to another place for work, this causes bad effect on his career.
15
2.5 EFFECT
Absenteeism is social evil, rather concern for an organization which
hampers production and has ill effect on the management, administration and
family of the workers. However, absenteeism has the following effect on the
organization.
Effect on the organization
a) The company has to pay bonus to the worker, which is double the normal
amount hence there is, a loss of finance to the organization.
b) When a worker is absent, his work has to be shard by other workers thus
increasing the additional responsibility of the co-worker, if such worker are
given to work frequently.
c) If the work of absentee is entrusted to a co-worker, he may not be able to
do that job he being not belong to that work thus could not be completed
which will have bad effect on the workshop production.
d) When a worker is absent particularly in number, it is a big headache for
the administration for regularization of leave or to proceed further in taking
disciplinary action against them. Lot of paper work and extra burden to the
administration is involved apart from stress and strain.
e) The habitual absences have strange relation with his supervisors,
management as well as with a co-worker who has perfected do his work.
Effect on Individual
Absent workers are deprived of economic loss to workers, leave traveling
allowance and privilege leave.
a) They will loss pay and allowances for the period of absence.
b) The absence period is not counted for bonus.
16
The habitual absentees became offender due to one reason or the other and
make them mentally upset which is ultimately have bad effect on social and
domestic life. This will lead the absent worker to indebtedness. This will lead him
to bad vices. This will become a social stigma and will also.
2.6 MODELS OF ATTENDANCE AND ABSENCE BEHAVIOUR
Models represent an attempt to formulate known causative and
moderating factors into an interpretable framework. These are useful in
understanding some of these interrelationships but do have a number of limiting
factors.
There are two competing, though not dissimilar theories for absenteeism:
the psychological and economic theories of workplace attendance. These
attempts to rationalise absenteeism, a multi-dimensional construct, to simple
important determinants. Both of these models highlight the importance of work
and non-work factors in absenteeism. They demonstrate that factors in addition
to illness and direct incapacity account for a proportion of workplace
absenteeism. This leaves open the opportunity for management interventions to
encourage and facilitate attendance by factors that may fall into their control.
However, they down play the role of illness and disease and ignore the possible
contribution that interventions at this level may make.
Psychological Model
Much of the psychological model is based upon work by Steers and
Rhodes, who advance a dichotomous causal model. Employee attendance is
17
conceptualized as largely a function of two variables: the ability to attend and the
motivation to attend.
The model seeks to emphasis as its workplace determinants such job
situational variables as reutilization, job stress, job satisfaction, work
involvement, leadership and co-worker support. The melding of the joint
influences of job satisfaction and pressures to attend result in attendance or
absence.
Research attempts to differentiate between voluntary and involuntary
absence as separate valid constructs. Hackett defines voluntary absences as
being under workers control, being typically short term, casual and illegitimate.
The decision to attend work is based upon motivational factors to attend.
Involuntary absences are typically beyond the control of the worker and tend to
be longer term, are thought to result more often from illness or family
responsibilities, and may be based on the workers ability to attend work. These
constructs are distinctly, differentially and significantly related to subsets of
organizational, personal and attitudinal variables. Being older, having longer
organizational employment record, organization commitment and a higher job
level are positive factors.
It is intuitively attractive to form a hypothesis that those who are less
satisfied with work are more likely to be absent. In a review of a number of meta-
analyses researching the relationship between job satisfaction and employee
absence77 a weak relationship between job satisfaction and absence frequency
of -0.2 was consistently evident. (i.e. job satisfaction accounted for 20% of the
variance of workplace absenteeism).
This lack of strength may be in part attributable to the effect of
unavoidable absences where motivation may not be a factor, external factors,
which attract absence from the workplace, the influence of organizational policies
18
and workgroup norms. Another consistent finding was increased relationship
strength with reduced absence duration. Implying shorter absences were more
likely to occur in association with relative job dissatisfaction.
These theories try to describe voluntary absence propensity as a function
of a behavioral tendency akin to absence proneness, relative work dissatisfaction
competing with the attractiveness of other settings, mounded by social culture
and norms, and influenced by past individual adaptations. It predicts that
absence will be reduced by improving job satisfaction and employee relations
and alludes to the significance of an absence culture.
Steers and Rhodes refer to a diagnostic model of attendance, which
includes consideration of:
major influences on attendance motivation;
major influences on perceived ability to attend and actual
attendance; and
role of societal context and reciprocal relationships.
Economic Theory of Labour Absence
Alternatively, there is the economic theory of labour absence. The
traditionalist economic perspective sees the need to work competing with other
alternatives as commodities within the same market. Much as weights on either
side of a balance scale with a potential advantage for the worker occurring where
standard hours of work exceed a worker’s preferred hours. (so called ‘opportunity
cost’ of taking sick leave) Economists have primarily focused on the effects of
19
incentives, unionization, wages, sick pay provisions and availability, employment
climate and demographic traits. It emphasizes the flattening of organizational
structures and the establishment of discretionary power at work as potential
solutions.
There are considerable overlaps between the above two models. It is
argued that the economic model is perhaps more predictive for the effects of
flexible work places, the effects of changing norms and the presence of external
factors and sees the effect of trade-offs between income and leisure and the
influence of award provisions, task oriented work groups and the provision of
opportunities for employees to have a say in the workplace.
Rather than seeing these models as competing alternatives, more insight
into voluntary absence may be gained in viewing them as complementary
perspectives.
Both of these models highlight the importance of work and non-work
factors in absenteeism.
Both models attempt to view absenteeism as a “rational” choice between
competing variables. The models imply linear or additive relationships between
factors; however studies of workplaces show a more idiosyncratic action and
interaction of factors with marked inconsistency of variables as a cause, outcome
or moderator. Whilst absence is usually considered to be the outcome variable,
some research suggests that absence can have a causative relationship in
lowering job satisfaction, supervisory support, performance and job achievement.
Job satisfaction, in its relationship with absenteeism, can be moderated by other
factors such as promotion opportunity, attendance ability or attendance pressure.
Associations between dependent workplace variables such as job
satisfaction and non-work satisfaction suggest the interplay of external factors.
20
More work needs to be done in understanding the moderators and mediators of
these relationships.
In the end, these models are trying to explain work absence with
constructs, which are relatively difficult to define or measure. With no absolute
standard the surrogates who are used must be subject to misclassification and
misinterpretation.
These models demonstrate that factors in addition to illness and direct
incapacity account for a proportion of workplace absenteeism. This leaves open
the opportunity for management interventions to encourage and facilitate
attendance by factors that may fall into their control.
2.7 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR GRANT OF LEAVE IN GOVERNMENT
ORGANISATIONS
a) Leave cannot be claimed as a matter of right.
b) The Leave Sanctioning Authority can refuse or revoke leave of any
kind if exigency arises.
c) It is not open to the leave Sanctioning Authority to alter the kind of
leave due and applied for.
d) No leave of any kind can be granted for a continuous period exceeding
five years except with the sanction of the President.
e) An official on leave should not take up any service or employment
without obtaining prior explicit sanction of the Competent Authority.
f) Gazetted Government Servant should produce Medical Certificate from
Authorised Medical Attendant and Non-Gazetted Government Servant
from AMA or RMP for leave on medical grounds. Second medical
21
opinion, if necessary may be obtained by the leave Sanctioning
Authority.
g) A Government servant on leave on medical grounds will be permitted
to return to duty only on production of medical certificate of fitness.
h) Over-stayal of leave without proper sanction will be debited against
HPL Account of the employee to the extent of HPL is due and the
excess treated as EOL.
i) Period of over-stayal will not count as a service for increment or
pension.
22
23
3.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
An attempt has been made to review the literature pertaining to various
aspects of Human Resource Management in the Government as well as private
sector industry. The review of studies provides proper prospective about the
research problem and helped to formulate a suitable methodology of the study. A
few of the major researches in the area have been explained below.
Rick D. Hackett (1990) in his research titled “Age, Tenure, and Employee
Absenteeism” revealed that two demographic/personal characteristics in the
Steers and Rhodes' (1978, 1984) process model of employee attendance, and on
which considerable research has accumulated in the absenteeism literature, are
age and tenure. Recent narrative reviews of this research show that the results
are quite mixed and likely to depend upon sex of the sample and absence type. A
meta-analysis (Hunter, Schmidt, & Jackson, 1982) of this literature revealed that
age (but not tenure) had a modest (p = -.23) relationship with avoidable
absences, neither age nor tenure was associated with unavoidable absences,
and sex of sample was identified as a moderator. Implications of these findings
for the Steers and Rhodes' model are discussed in light of possible directions for
future research.
Mark John Somers (1995) in his study titled “A test of the relationship
between affective and continuance commitment using non-recursive models”
concluded that affective commitment emerged as the most consistent predictor of
these outcome variables and was the only view of commitment related to
turnover and to absenteeism. A three component model of organizational
commitment was used to study job withdrawal intentions, turnover and
absenteeism. In contrast, normative commitment was related only to withdrawal
24
intentions while no direct effects for continuance commitment were observed.
Continuance commitment, however, interacted with affective commitment in
predicting job withdrawal intentions and absenteeism. The form of the interaction
was such that high sunk costs tempered relationships between affective
commitment and the relevant outcome variables.
Andrew A. L. and Ian R. Gellatly (1996) in their study on “Exit-voice and
employee absenteeism: A critique of the industrial relations literature”
examined the effects of collective voice on employee absenteeism through
traditional exit-voice analyses suffers from a number of important theoretical and
empirical limitations. The research is limited theoretically in that the framework
used cannot discretely classify absenteeism as a form of either exit or voice. This
inability reflects a larger problem with the exit-voice framework’s lack of adequate
attention to the conditions under which collective voice mechanisms fail and the
consequences of such failure for the behavior of industrial relations actors.
Absences were regarded as voluntary or involuntary based on the reasons
provided by the employees or supervisors in his study on “Employee
Absenteeism, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction: Another Look”
by Sagie A.(1998). it was hypothesized that voluntary as opposed to involuntary
absenteeism can be predicted by organizational commitment, job satisfaction,
and their interactive effect. Intention to quit was expected to predict voluntary
absenteeism as well. Subjects were 140 clerks in an Israeli municipality (average
age was 41). Moderated multiple regression analyses of attitudes and objective
(personnel records) or subjective (self-reported) absence data yielded support for
the first hypothesis. Nonetheless, the intention to quit was not significantly related
to either type of absence. Theoretical and methodological considerations were
discussed and implications for continued research were outlined.
25
Easton, Fred F. and John C. Goodale (2002) in their study on “Labor
scheduling with employee turnover and absenteeism” concluded that most labor
staffing and scheduling models presume that all employees scheduled for duty
reliably report for work at the beginning of their shift. For industries with even
moderate turnover or absenteeism, this assumption may be quite costly. The
study present a profit-oriented labor scheduling model that accounts for the day-
to-day flux of employees and capacity induced by voluntary resignations, new
hires, experience curves, and absenteeism. The proposed model also anticipates
revenue losses due to reneging by customers whose patience decays
exponentially with queue time. The computational studies suggest that firms with
comparatively high transaction volumes, long transaction times, and/or relatively
tight profit margins may experience significant benefit from this approach.
Compared with conventional labor scheduling models, the proposed method
boosts average expected profits by more than 10 percent in certain operating
environments.
Diane R. Skåtun and John D.S. (2004), in their paper on “The Impact of
Turnout on Turning Up: the Complementarity of Attendance among Co-Workers”
studied the effects of complementarities in work attendance on absenteeism. It
investigates the case where workers, who turn up for work, cover the workload of
absent colleagues. Thus, externalities arise from workers being absent from
work. The effort workers exert in the workplace is negatively related to worker
turnout. Attendance levels of workers are strategic complements, as workers are
more likely to turn up when turnout is high. Firms increase wages and improve
working conditions in response. In contrast to the more standard shirking
literature, the firm sets employment levels higher. Workers may benefit from
draconian firing rules.
Jinhee Kim, Benoit Sorhaindo and E. Thomas Garman (2006)
researched on “Relationship between Financial Stress and Workplace
26
Absenteeism of Credit Counseling Clients”. The researchers examined how
financial stress was associated with absenteeism of credit counseling clients.
Data were collected by a national non-profit credit counseling organization, from
consumers who telephoned seeking assistance in debt management. The results
indicate credit counseling clients’ financial stress affects their absenteeism at
work. Clients with high levels of financial stress are more likely to experience
higher levels of absenteeism; thus spending work hours handling personal
finances, which decreases the time they are at work. The results suggest some
insight into providing financial education and assistance for employees with
financial strains as productivity loss might influence their pay.
After going through the work of various researches and surveys done, it
has been found that most of the researchers have used secondary data alone as
a base of their study. The present study has used data collected from the primary
sources in addition to secondary data. Study of employee’s absenteeism in a
Punjab based IT company not only for the purpose of evaluation but for the better
job satisfaction of the employees and better performance of the company has
also failed to attract attention of any researcher.
Thus, most of the studies covered topics related to absenteeism in non-IT
industries. There appears enough scope for carrying out the study and making
an analysis of employee’s absenteeism and its effectiveness in IT sector based
in Punjab which is far behind the neighboring States as far as growth of IT sector
is concerned.
27
28
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter describes the methodology in terms of the research design
involving sampling, tools, questionnaire design, methods of collecting data and
its analysis. The questionnaire, its validity and reliability and the techniques used
for analysis of the final data are outlined. The methodology of the pilot and the
main study is explained.
Both primary as well as secondary data has been used for the study.
Primary data has been collected by using a questionnaire comprising of 15
questions and getting it filled by employees of the company.
4.1 PLAN ADOPTED FOR RESEARCH STUDY
The research methodology adopted for the study is summarized in a
flowchart (see Figure 1.0)
4.2 DESIGNING OF A QUESTIONNAIRE
The success of the questionnaire method for collecting information
depends largely on the proper designing of the questionnaire. The designing of a
questionnaire is a highly specialize job and requires a great deal of skill and
experience. It is difficult to lay down any hard and fast rules to be followed in this
connection.
Most of what is known about making questionnaire is based on
experience. Neither a basic theory nor a fully systemized approach to the
problem has been developed. Never the less the extensive experience of many
researchers and limited number of organized experiments have let to a
considerable understanding of the problem. These are definitely help a beginner
29
researcher to avoid pitfalls, but they can not be substituted for creating
imagination in designing the questionnaire procedures.
30
FORMULATION OF RESEARCH
EXTENSIVE SURVEY OF LITERATURE ANDREVIEW & IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
DESIGN OF QUESTIONNAIRES
PRE-TESTING OF THE QUESTIONNAIRES
MODIFICATIONS AND REFINEMENT
MAIN STUDY
DATA COLLECTION
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONUse of statistical techniques and graphical representation
DISCUSSION OF THE FINDINGS FROM THE STUDY
RECOMMENDATIONS
Figure 1.0 Flow-chart of Methodology
4.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
In view of the objectives of this study the respondents were chosen from
five different departments including Finance, Human Resource, Marketing,
Working classe (Technical) Department. During the present study, the researcher
also held informal discussions with experts in HRM from industry to know their
views regarding factors contributing towards effectiveness of an employee’s
absenteeism reduction system.
The present study makes use of primary data for critically examining the
effectiveness of attendance system prevailing in the company.
4.4 SAMPLING PLAN
4.4.1 Sample Size
The sample comprised of employees from each of the identified
department in Paras Pharmaceuticals. Total of 200 employees were covered for
collection of data.
4.5 Data Collection
Primary data collected for the present study was restricted to sample
departments mentioned in section 5.3 Selection of the sample was purposive and
based on the judgment.
31
4.5.1 Primary Data
A) Respondents
All the major departments of the company were identified and
employees selected on random basis were covered for collection of data.
B) Tools
Separate pre-tested questionnaires were designed for employees.
The questionnaires were pre-tested for clarity on six respondents (three
from the HR department and three from other than HR). Improved
questionnaires were used for final collection of data.
4.6 DATA ANALYSIS
The primary data received through questionnaires from employees of
different departments of the company was classified and tabulated. Quantitative
and Qualitative analysis was done and inferences were drawn in line with
objective of the study.
Techniques
The data was classified and tabulated. Statistical techniques were applied.
Number and percentages were calculated and Chi-Square test was applied to
see the difference between different variables and correlations between different
variables.
32
Crosstabs with Chi-Square Test.
Chi-Square Test was applied for crosstabs tables to check whether two
variables are independent of each other or not.
This chapter delineates the methodology in terms of the research design,
sampling design, questionnaire design, methods of data collection and the
analysis of data. The research design described the conceptual framework within
which the research study has been conducted. The pre-testing of the
questionnaires, their validity and the techniques used for analysis of the final data
are outlined. The chapter explained the methodology of the pilot and the main
study and also highlights the methods and techniques used for the analysis of
data.
4.7 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1. To understand the meaning and concept of various terms used in the
study.
2. To study the concept and theory of attendance and absence behavior at
workplace in general and its application in PARAS PHARAMCEUTICALS
LTD. BADDI.
33
3. To study employees opinion and satisfaction level towards existing leave
policy.
4. To study the overall impact of absenteeism on organizational
performance.
5. To find the reasons why the employees remain absent from their work.
6. To recommend some preventive measures to reduce the rate of
absenteeism.
4.8 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
1. In the era of corporate confidential environment, employees do not
provide the complete information that may harm the research
conclusion.
2. The information given by the low level employees may be bias as they
usually remain under the essence of hallo effect of the researches and
are scared being pointed out in the future as later assumes that the
researcher sometimes may have in groups with the top level
managers.
3. Time and cost are the general barriers that affect the efficiency and
validity of the research.
34
35
GOVERNMENT GUIDELINES FOR ABSENTEEISM CONTROL
The Government has framed law under labor department to control
absenteeism in the factories and government establishments.
5.1 TYPES OF ABSENTEEISM
There are two types of absenteeism, each of which requires a different
type of approach.
a) Innocent Absenteeism
Innocent absenteeism refers to employees who are absent for reasons
beyond their control; like sickness and injury. Innocent absenteeism is not
culpable which means that it is blameless. In a labour relations context this
means that it cannot be remedied or treated by disciplinary measures.
b) Culpable Absenteeism
Culpable absenteeism refers to employees who are absent without
authorization for reasons which are within their control. For instance, an
employee who is on sick leave even though he is not sick and it can be proved
that the employee was not sick is guilty of culpable absenteeism. To be culpable
is to be blameworthy. In a labour relations context this means that progressive
discipline can be applied.
36
For the large majority of employees, absenteeism is legitimate, innocent
absenteeism which occurs infrequently. Procedures for disciplinary action apply
only to culpable absenteeism. Many organizations take the view that through the
process of individual absentee counseling and treatment, the majority of
employees will overcome their problems and return to an acceptable level of
regular attendance.
5.2 Identifying Excessive Absenteeism
Attendance records should be reviewed regularly to be sure that an
employee's sick-leave days are excessive compared to other employees. If a
supervisor suspects that an employee is excessively absent, this can be
confirmed through reviewing the attendance records.
If all indications show that an employee is excessively absent, the next
step is to gather as much information as possible in order to get a clearer picture
of the situation. The employees' files should be reviewed and the employee’s
immediate supervisor should document all available information on the particular
employee's history.
Individual Communication
After all available information has been gathered, the administrator or
supervisor should individually meet with each employee whom has been
identified as having higher than average or questionable (or pattern) absences.
This first meeting should be used to bring concerns regarding attendance to the
employee's attention. It is also an opportunity to discuss with the employee, in
some depth, the causes of his or her attendance problem and possible steps he
37
or she can take to remedy or control the absences. Listen carefully to the
employee's responses.
The tone of the meeting should not be adversarial, but a major purpose of
the interview is to let the employee know that management treats attendance as
a very important component of overall work performance. Keep your comments
non-threatening and work-oriented. Stick to the facts (i.e. patters, profiles, rates
etc.). The employee should be given a copy of there attendance report with
absences highlighted for discussion.
This interview will give you the opportunity to explore in depth with the
employee the reasons for his or her absence. Gather facts - do not make any
assumptions. Provide support and counselling and offer guidance as the
occasion demands to assist the employee to deal with the specific cause of the
absence.
Often, after the initial meeting employees reduce their absenteeism. The
meeting shows that you are concerned and that absenteeism is taken seriously.
The employee's attendance should be closely monitored until it has been
reduced to acceptable levels. Appropriate counselling should take place as is
thought necessary. If a marked improvement has been shown, commend the
employee. The meeting should be documented and a copy placed in the
employee's file.
Proof of Illness
Sometimes it is helpful in counseling employees with excessive innocent
or culpable absenteeism to inquire or verify the nature and reasons of their
absence.
38
The extent to which an employer may inquire into the nature of and
reasons for an employee's absence from the workplace is a delicate issue. The
concepts of an employee's privacy and an employer's need for information
affecting the workplace often come into conflict. Seldom is the conflict more
difficult to resolve than where personal medical information is involved.
Unions will often strongly object to any efforts by management to inquire
more deeply into the nature of an employee's illness. You will need to consider
the restraints of any language in collective agreements in relation to this issue.
Generally speaking, however, the following "rules of thumb" can be derived
from the existing jurisprudence:
1. There is a prevailing right to privacy on the part of an employee unless the
employer can demonstrate that its legitimate business interests
necessitate some intrusion into the employee's personal affairs.
2. When such intrusion is justified it should be strictly limited to the degree of
intrusion necessitated by the employer's interests.
3. An employee has a duty to notify his employer of an intended absence,
the cause of the absence and its expected duration. This information is
required by the employer to meet its legitimate concerns to have at its
disposal facts which will enable it to schedule work and organize its
operation.
4. An absent employee has an obligation to provide his employer with
information regarding any change to his condition or circumstances
relating to it which may affect the employer's needs as described in item
#3 above. As such, the interest of the employer in having this information
outweighs the individual employee's right to privacy.
5. An employer rule requiring proof for every absence is unreasonable if an
absenteeism problem does not exist.
39
6. A mere assertion by the person claiming to be sick is not satisfactory
proof.
7. The obligation to prove sickness, where the employer requires proof, rests
with the employee.
8. An employer is entitled upon reasonable and probable grounds to refuse
to accept a physician's certificate until it contains sufficient information to
satisfy the employer's reservations. (i.e. seen by physician, some
indication of return to work, etc.). Non-production of a required medical
certificate could result in loss of pay until the certificate is produced.
9. Where a medical certificate is rejected by an employer (as in #8 above)
the employer must state the grounds for rejection and must point out to
the employee what it requires to satisfy the onus of proof.
10.An employer may require an employee to prove fitness for work where it
has reasonable grounds to do so. In a health care setting the nature of the
employer's business gives it a reasonably irresistible interest in this
personal information for the purpose of assessing fitness.
11.Where any unusual circumstances raise reasonable suspicion that an
employee might have committed an abuse of an income protection
program an employer may require an employee to explain such
circumstances. For example, an employer may require responses as to
whether the illness confined an employee to his/her bed or home; whether
an employee engaged in any outside activity and the reasons for the
activity.
In summary then, any intrusion into the employee's privacy must be shown
to be reasonable, based on the individual circumstances and in relation to the
operation of the employer's business. If income protection abuse is suspected
the extent to which such intrusion is "reasonable" would be far greater than in the
case where it is not. If you are not clear on whether an inquiry is legally justified it
is advisable to consult your superior.
40
After the Initial Interview
If after the initial interview, enough time and counseling efforts, as
appropriate, have passed and the employee's absenteeism has not improved, it
may be necessary to take further action. Further action must be handled with
extreme caution - a mistake in approach, timing or severity can be crippling from
both an administration and labour relation's point of view.
Determining whether counseling or disciplinary action is appropriate,
depends on whether the employee's absences are innocent or culpable. If the
employee's absenteeism is made up of both innocent and culpable absences,
then each type must be dealt with as a separate issue. In a labour relation's
context innocent absenteeism and culpable absenteeism are mutually exclusive.
One in no way affects the other.
Counseling Innocent Absenteeism
Innocent absenteeism is not blameworthy and therefore disciplinary action
is not justified. It is obviously unfair to punish someone for conduct which is
beyond his/her control. Absenteeism, no matter what the cause, imposes losses
on the employer who is also not at fault. The damage suffered by the employer
must be weighed against the employee's right to be sick. There is a point at
which the employer's right to expect the employee to attend regularly and fulfill
the employment contract will outweigh the employee's right to be sick. At such a
point the termination of the employee may be justified, as will be discussed.
The procedure an employer may take for innocent absenteeism is as follows:
1. Initial counseling(s)
41
2. Written counseling(s)
3. Reduction(s) of hours and/or job reclassification
4. Discharge
Initial Counseling
Presuming you have communicated attendance expectations generally
and have already identified an employee as a problem, you will have met with
him or her as part of your attendance program and you should now continue to
monitor the effect of these efforts on his or her attendance.
If the absences are intermittent, meet with the employee each time he/she
returns to work. If absence is prolonged, keep in touch with the employee
regularly and stay updated on the status of his/her condition. (Indicate your
willingness to assist.)
You may require the employee to provide you with regular medical
assessments. This will enable you to judge whether or not there is any likelihood
of the employee providing regular attendance in future. Regular medical
assessments will also give you an idea of what steps the employee is taking to
seek medical or other assistance. Formal meetings in which verbal warnings are
given should be given as appropriate and documented. If no improvement occurs
written warning may be necessary.
Written Counseling
If the absences persist, you should meet with the employee formally and
provide him/her with a letter of concern. If the absenteeism still continues to
persist then the employee should be given a second letter of concern during
another formal meeting. This letter would be stronger worded in that it would
42
warn the employee that unless attendance improves, termination may be
necessary.
Reduction(s) of hours and or job reclassification
In between the first and second letters the employee may be given the
option to reduce his/her hours to better fit his/her personal circumstances. This
option must be voluntarily accepted by the employee and cannot be offered as
an ultimatum, as a reduction in hours is a reduction in pay and therefore can be
looked upon as discipline.
If the nature of the illness or injury is such that the employee is unable to
fulfill the requirements of his/her job, but could for example benefit from modified
work, counsel the employee to bid on jobs of such type if they become available.
(N.B. It is inadvisable to "build" a job around an employee's incapacitates
particularly in a unionized environment. The onus should be on the employee to
apply for an existing position within his/her capabilities.)
Discharge
Only when all the previously noted needs and conditions have been met and
everything has been done to accommodate the employee can termination be
considered. An Arbitrator would consider the following in ruling on an innocent
absenteeism dismissal case.
1. Has the employee done everything possible to regain their health and
return to work?
2. Has the employer provided all assistance possible? (i.e. counseling,
support, time off.)
43
3. Has the employer informed the employee of the unworkable situation
resulting from their sickness?
4. Has the employer attempted to accommodate the employee by offering a
more suitable position (if available) or a reduction of hours?
5. Has enough time elapsed to allow for every possible chance of recovery?
6. Has the employer treated the employee prejudicially in any way?
As is evident, a great deal of time and effort must elapse before dismissal can
take place.
These points would be used to substantiate or disprove the following two fold
test.
1. The absences must be shown to be clearly excessive.
2. It must be proven that the employee will be unable to attend work on a
regular basis in the future.
5.3 Corrective Action for Culpable Absenteeism
As already indicated, culpable absenteeism consists of absences where it
can be demonstrated that the employee is not actually ill and is able to improve
his/her attendance.
Presuming you have communicated attendance expectations generally,
have identified the employee as a problem, have met with him/her as part of your
attendance program, made your concerns on his specific absenteeism known
and have offered counseling as appropriate, with no improvement despite your
positive efforts, disciplinary procedures may be appropriate.
44
The procedures for corrective/progressive discipline for culpable absenteeism
are generally the same as for other progressive discipline problems. The
discipline should not be prejudicial in any way. The general procedure is as
follows: [Utilizing counseling memorandum]
1. Initial Warning(s)
2. Written Warning(s)
3. Suspension(s)
4. Discharge
Verbal Warning
Formally meet with the employee and explain that income protection is to
be used only when an employee is legitimately ill. Advice the employee that
his/her attendance record must improve and be maintained at an improved level
or further disciplinary action will result. Offer any counseling or guidance as is
appropriate. Give further verbal warnings as required. Review the employee's
income protection records at regular intervals. Where a marked improvement has
been shown, commend the employee. Where there is no improvement a written
warning should be issued.
Written Warning
Interview the employee again. Show him/her the statistics and point out
that there has been no noticeable (or sufficient) improvement. Listen to the
employee to see if there is a valid reason and offer any assistance you can. If no
satisfactory explanation is given, advise the employee that he/she will be given a
written warning. Be specific in your discussion with him/her and in the counseling
memorandum as to the type of action to be taken and when it will be taken if the
45
record does not improve. As soon as possible after this meeting provide the
employee personally with the written warning and place a copy of his/her file. The
written warning should identify any noticeable pattern
If the amount and/or pattern continue, the next step in progressive
discipline may be a second, stronger written warning. Your decision to provide a
second written warning as an alternative to proceeding to a higher level of
discipline (i.e. suspension) will depend on a number of factors. Such factors are,
the severity of the problem, the credibility of the employee's explanations, the
employee's general work performance and length of service.
Suspension (only after consultation with the appropriate superiors)
If the problem of culpable absenteeism persists, following the next interview
period and immediately following an absence, the employee should be
interviewed and advised that he/she is to be suspended. The length of the
suspension will depend again on the severity of the problem, the credibility of the
employee's explanation, the employee's general work performance and length of
service. Subsequent suspensions are optional depending on the above condition.
Dismissal (only after consultation with the appropriate superiors)
Dismissals should only be considered when all of the above conditions and
procedures have been met. The employee, upon displaying no satisfactory
improvement, would be dismissed on the grounds of his/her unwillingness to
correct his/her absence record.
46
47
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
This chapter is devoted to in-depth study and analysis of primary data
collected from the employees of the various departments of the company.
Responses received from respondents in respect of each question of the
questionnaire have been tabulated, analyzed below to arrive at an interpretation.
Out of 200 employees to whom the questionnaire was given, 128 have
responded and submitted the questionnaire duly filled-up.
Response Data
The sample size is of 200 and out of these 128 has responded and 72
people have either ignored to respond or have not given the required information.
Sample Size Responses Percentage of
response
200 128 64
48
QUESTION NO. 01
Respondent’s Working Place.
Table 6.01 Question Number 01
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
HR 23 17.97
Marketing 42 32.82
Finance 08 6.25
Working class 55 42.96
49
Interpretation
Majority of the sample employees were engaged in either Working class
(43%) or Marketing (33%) activities. Employees from the Finance division
comprised only 6% of the total respondents.
QUESTION NO. 02
Marital Status
Table 6.02 Question Number 02
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Married 40 31.25
Unmarried 88 68.75
Division-wise Respondents
23
42
8
55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
HR Mkt Fin Wc
Divisons
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
50
Marrital Status
40
88
Married
Unmarried
Interpretation
The present study shows that about two third of the employees are
unmarried in the organization.
The result shows that majority of the employees are free from family
responsibilities and hence can contribute more time at workplace.
QUESTION NO. 03
Employee’s Age Group
Table 6.03 Question Number 03
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Above 25 years 38 29.68
25-40 years 65 50.78
More than 40 years 25 19.54
51
Interpretation
The study revealed that more than 50% of the sample employees were
from age group 25-40 years. More than 40 years old were as low as 19%.
The result found that Paras Pharmaceuticals is a young organization with
dynamic workforce.
QUESTION NO. 04
Leave Procedure
Table 6.04 Question Number 04
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 77 60.15
No 51 39.85
52
Age Group
38
65
25
Above 25
25-40 yrs
> 40 yrs
Simplifies Procedure
77
51Yes
No
Interpretation
Seventy Seven (60.15%) out of 128 employees selected for the present
study in Paras agree that the existing procedure for availing leave by the
employees is quite simplified. However, 40% of the respondents feel that the
procedure need to be further simplified.
The results of the study demand that the company need to further simplify its
Procedure for leave.
QUESTION NO. 05
Problems while processing leave applications
Table 6.05 Question Number 05
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 58 45.32
No 70 54.68
53
Interpretation
The study found that majority (55%) of the sample employees does not
face any problem while processing their leave applications. 45% however, feel a
need for improvements.
QUESTION NO. 06
Employee’s Leave Entitlement
Table 6.06 Question Number 06
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 54 42.18
No 74 57.82
54
Interpretation
Majority of the sample employees are of the view that present leave
entitlement in a year is not sufficient to meet their requirements.
During the present study, it was found that leave entitlements of the
employees was fixed more than five years back. Therefore, it need a review.
QUESTION NO. 07
Reasons for Taking Leave
Table 6.07 Question Number 07
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Professional Stress 43 33.59
Personal or family sickness 39 30.47
Social Cause 15 11.72
55
Further studies 31 24.22
Interpretation
The study has revealed that major reason for taking leave by the
employees has been the professional stress (34%) while personal or family
sickness is equally consuming their leave stocks. Further, the present study
found that up-gradation of knowledge also need leaves.
The company needs to take necessary measures to reduce mental stress.
As up-gradation of knowledge by the employees will help them to better
perform at workplace and hence benefit is passed on to the company
incentive scheme need to be introduced.
QUESTION NO. 08
Discrimination in Leave Sanction
Table 6.08 Question Number 08
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 51 39.84
No 77 60.16
56
Interpretation
It was found that seventy seven (60%) of the total 128 sample employees
strongly believe that there is discrimination in leave sanction by superiors.
The results suggest that the company need to device a procedure to minimize
discrimination. Faith of employees with their superiors is must for a healthy
work environment.
QUESTION NO. 09
Motivational Leave Culture
Table 6.09 Question Number 09
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 93 72.66
No 35 27.34
57
Interpretation
Most of the sample employees consider that a motivational leave culture
exists in the company.
The study has also found that majority of the employees are taking leave due
to reason of professional stress. Therefore, a minimum leave must be availed
by all the employees for
a balanced performance.
QUESTION NO. 10
Sharing of Personal Problems with Superiors
Table 6.10 Question Number 10
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 39 30.47
No 89 69.53
58
Interpretation
The study has indicated that 89 of the total 128 respondents (69.5%) do
not share their problems with the superiors. Only 30.4% like to share them with
others.
Finding of the study indicate that the relation between subordinates and
superiors need to be improved for better productivity in the working.
QUESTION NO. 11
Working Conditions
Table 6.11 Question Number 11
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 93 72.66
No 35 27.34
59
Interpretation
Study found that most of the employees in the organization are happy with
the working conditions at workplace.
This result shows a healthy sign which need to be continued by the company
for a better productivity.
QUESTION NO. 12
Relation with Immediate Boss
Table 6.12 Question Number 12
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Good 116 90.63
Bad 12 9.37
60
Interpretation
Almost all the sample employees (90.6%) have good relations with their
bosses.
This result supports previous results of the study in regards to a good working
environment in the company.
QUESTION NO. 13
Medical & Transport Facilities
Table 6.13 Question Number 13
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 85 66.41
No 43 33.59
61
Interpretation
The study has further revealed that one third of the respondent employees
feels that sufficient medical and transport facilities are being provided by the
company to them.
A better medical and transport facility inspire the employees to come to work
even in hard days which reduce absenteeism to a large extent.
QUESTION NO. 14
Prior permission before proceeding on Leave
Table 6.14 Question Number 14
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
Yes 83 64.84
No 45 35.16
62
Interpretation
The present study has recorded that most of the employees in the
organization proceed on leave with prior permission from their bosses.
The result indicate that the bosses i.e. management of the company is in a
better position for a planned working to generate better results due to
employees not going on leave without knowledge of their bosses.
QUESTION NO. 15
Distance from Residence to Workplace
Table 6.15 Question Number 15
Scales Number of
Respondents
Percentage
00 – 05 kms 15 11.72
05 – 10 Kms 70 54.68
10-15 kms 31 24.22
Above 15 Kms 12 9.38
63
Interpretation
The present study has further revealed that more than half of the
employees are staying at a reasonably short distance of 05-10 kms. Only 12 out
of 128 respondents (9%) commute daily from places more than 15 kms distance
from workplace.
Short travels always help an employee to be record less absenteeism.
Correlation between Q. 5 and Q.1
(Correlation between Problems while processing of Leave Applications &
Functional Division)
Crosstab
Q5
TotalYES
NO
Q1HR
Count 7 16 23
% within Q5 12.1% 22.9% 18.0%
Marketing Count 15 27 42
64
% within Q5 25.9% 38.6% 32.8%
FinanceCount 5 3 8
% within Q5 8.6% 4.3% 6.3%
Working classs
Count 31 24 55
% within Q5 53.4% 34.3% 43.0%
Total Count 58 70 128
% within Q5 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Finding
With the correlation between Problems while processing of Leave
Applications & Functional Division the result shows that 58 employees face
problem and 70 do not. The Chi–square test is applied and it is more than 0.05
so, it shows that different departments have difficulty in availing leave.
The employees need to be provided regular break intervals while working
Correlation between Q. 5 and Q.3
(Correlation between Problems while processing of Leave Applications &
Age Group)
Cross tab
SQ5
TotalYES
NO
Q3Above 25 YRS
Count 19 19 38
% within Q5 32.8% 27.1% 29.7%
25-40 YRS Count 30 36 66
% within Q5 51.7% 51.4% 51.6%
65
More Than 40 YRSCount 9 15 24
% within Q5 15.5% 21.4% 18.8%
TotalCount 58 70 128
% within Q5 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Findings
With the correlation between Age group of employees with the Problems
while processing of Leave Applications the result shows that 58 employees face
problems while 70 number employees do not report facing any problem. The
Chi–square test is applied and level of significance is 0.629 which is more than
0.05 and therefore, it shows that different age group employees have difficulty in
availing leave. However, lower age group employees of less than 25 years have
more difficulty than the others and those in the age group of more than 40 years
have minimum difficulty.
Correlation between Q. 5 and Q.7
(Correlation between Problems while processing of Leave Applications &
Reasons for Taking Leave)
Cross tab
Q5
TotalYES
NO
Q7PROFESSIONAL STRESS
Count 21 23 44
% within Q5 36.2% 32.9% 34.4%
PERSONAL OR F SICKNESS Count 20 19 39
66
% within Q5 34.5% 27.1% 30.5%
SOCIAL CAUSECount 7 8 15
% within Q5 12.1% 11.4% 11.7%
FURTHER STUDIESCount 10 20 30
% within Q5 17.2% 28.6% 23.4%
TotalCount 58 70 128
% within Q5 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Findings
With the correlation between the Problems while processing of Leave
Applications with the reasons for taking leaves by the employees the result
shows that 36.2% and 34,5% employees face problems due to professional
stress and sickness respectively The Chi–square test is applied and level of
significance is 0.491 which is more than 0.05 and therefore, it shows that the
employees found difficulty in availing leaves for different reasons.
Correlation between Q. 5 and Q.11
(Correlation between Problems while processing of Leave Applications &
Working Conditions)
Cross tab
Q5Total
YES NO
Q11YES
Count 47 46 93
% within Q5 81.0% 65.7% 72.7%
NO Count 11 24 35
67
% within Q5 19.0% 34.3% 27.3%
TotalCount 58 70 128
% within Q5 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Findings
With the correlation between the Working Conditions at the work place
with the Problems while processing of Leave Applications the result shows that
81% employees face problems due to working conditions. The Chi–square test is
applied and level of significance is 0.05 which is more than 0.05 and therefore, it
shows that the employees do not found difficulty in availing leaves due to working
conditions at work place.
Correlation between Q. 5 and Q.15
(Correlation between Problems while processing of Leave Applications &
Distance from Residence to Workplace)
Cross tab
Q5
TotalYES
NO
Q150 - 5 km
Count 5 10 15
% within Q5 8.6% 14.3% 11.7%
5 -10 kmCount 33 37 70
% within Q5 56.9% 52.9% 54.7%
10-15 km Count 16 15 31
68
% within Q5 27.6% 21.4% 24.2%
Above 15 kmCount 4 8 12
% within Q5 6.9% 11.4% 9.4%
TotalCount 58 70 128
% within Q5 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Findings
The correlation results show that 56.9% employees face problems due to
distance of 05-10 kms from their residence to the workplace. The Chi–square
test is applied and level of significance is 0.541 which is more than 0.05 and
therefore, it shows that the employees found difficulty in availing leaves due to
the distance factor.
Correlation between Q. 13 and Q.15
(Medical & transport Facilities and Distance from Residence to Workplace)
Cross tabulation
Q15
TotalUPTO 5 km 5.1-10 km 10.1-15 km
>15 km
Q13
YESCount 12 44 20 8 84
% within Q15 60.0% 62.9% 64.5% 66.7% 65.6%
NOCount 3 26 11 4 44
% within Q15 20.0% 37.1% 35.5% 33.3% 34.4%
TotalCount 15 70 31 12 128
% within Q15 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
69
Findings
The correlation between the Transport and Medical facilities with the
distance of residence of an employee to the workplace was established. In
maximum cases (66.7%) the Transport & Medical facilities have relation with the
distance. More the distance there will be higher requirement for a transport
facility. The Chi–square test is applied and level of significance is 0.652 which is
more than 0.05 and therefore, it shows that the employees staying at far
distances found more need for a better transport and medical facility.
70
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of the present study by critically examining the
effectiveness of various systems including that for processing leave applications
prevailing in the company to reduce absenteeism in the organization using
primary data as well as informal discussions with experts in HRM from industry,
conclusions were drawn and the following recommendations are made:
1. The present study shows that about two third of the employees are
unmarried in the organization. The result shows that majority of the
employees are free from family responsibilities and hence can contribute
more time at workplace. The company may introduce a motivational
scheme for more working hours and availing less leaves.
71
2. The study revealed that more than 50% of the sample employees were
from age group 25-40 years. More than 40 years old were as low as 19%.
The result found that Paras Pharmasuticals is a young organization with
dynamic workforce who invest their energy in the company. The company
needs to take measures for better utilization of energy of young workforce.
3. Seventy Seven (60.15%) out of 128 employees selected for the present
study in Paras agree that the existing procedure for availing leave by the
employees is quite simplified. However, 40% of the respondents feel that
the procedure need to be further simplified. The results of the study
demand that the company need to further simplify its Procedure for leave.
4. Majority of the sample employees are of the view that present leave
entitlement in a year is not sufficient to meet their requirements. During
the present study, it was found that leave entitlements of the employees
was fixed more than five years back. Therefore, it needs a review.
5. The study has revealed that major reason for taking leave by the
employees has been the professional stress (34%) while personal or
family sickness is equally consuming their leave stocks. Further, the
present study found that up-gradation of knowledge also need leaves.
The company needs to take necessary measures to reduce mental
stress.
As up-gradation of knowledge by the employees will help them to
better perform at workplace and hence benefit is passed on to the
company incentive scheme need to be introduced.
6. It was found that seventy seven (60%) of the total 128 sample employees
strongly believe that there is discrimination in leave sanction by superiors.
72
The company need to device a procedure to minimize discrimination. Faith
of employees with their superiors is must for a healthy work environment.
7. The study has indicated that 89 of the total 128 respondents (69.5%) do
not share their problems with the superiors. Only 30.4% like to share them
with others. Finding of the study indicate that the relation between
subordinates and superiors need to be improved for better productivity in
the working. There can be more family get together organized by the
company.
8. Study found that most of the employees in the organization are happy with
the working conditions at workplace. This result shows a healthy sign
which need to be continued by the company for a better productivity.
9. The study has further revealed that one third of the respondent employees
feels that sufficient medical and transport facilities are being provided by
the company to them. A better medical and transport facility inspire the
employees to come to work even in hard days which reduce absenteeism
to a large extent.
10.The present study has recorded that most of the employees in the
organization proceed on leave with prior permission from their bosses.
The result indicate that the bosses i.e. management of the company is in a
better position for a planned working to generate better results due to
employees not going on leave without knowledge of their bosses.
11.Company should work for encouragement and motivation of employees
through dedicated or augmented training programmes for time
management and other behavioural activities. Superior should play their
part in making employees feel that their contribution to the working group
73
and to the objectives of the firm is really valued. Employees recognition
can reinforce appropriate attendance behaviour. Lack of concern or
inattention can give rise to increased rates of leave taking.
12.Rewards, penalties or incentives have an important role in absence
management and the creation of the attendance culture. Such devices can
vary from unambiguous rewards such as financial gain, through to clear
penalties such as dismissal or even prosecution for fraud. There is a
tendency to underestimate the importance of acknowledgement and public
recognition as a form of reward and the use of relative disincentives
including requirements to account for leave and provide direct information
to superior of leave taken.
13.Grievances procedures have an important role in addressing workplace
conflict. Workplace grievances appear to have a direct association with
increased absenteeism particularly in the short term. Such grievances
may generate sufficiently felt inquiry to concurrently generate grievance
action and withdrawal in the form of absenteeism. Developing procedures
to deal with disputes including consultative and participating mechanisms
may intercede in this process. Opportunities should be developed to
provide effective occupational health and safety committees or
consultative committees with sufficient training and commitment to create
open channels of communication.
74
75
8 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Rick D. Hackett (1990), “Age, Tenure, and Employee Absenteeism”, McMaster
University, Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 7.
Kothari, C.R. (1993), “Research Methodology”, Wiley Eastern Limited, New
Delhi.
Somers, M. (1995), “A test of the relationship between affective and continuance
76
commitment using non-recursive models”, Journal of Occupational Psychology,
No. 66, 185-192.
Sagie, A. (1998), “Employee Absenteeism, Organizational Commitment, and Job
Satisfaction: Another Look”’, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, Vol. 52, No. 2.
Easton, Fred F. and John C. Goodale (2002), “Labor scheduling with employee
turnover and absenteeism”, Working paper, Syracuse University.
Diane R. Skåtun, and John D.S. (2004), “The Impact of Turnout on Turning Up:
the Complementarity of Attendance among Co-Workers”.
Gupta, Shashi K., and Joshi Rosy (2004),“Human Resource Management”,
Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Jinhee Kim, Benoit Sorhaindo, and E. Thomas Garman (2006) “Relationship
between Financial Stress and Workplace Absenteeism of Credit Counseling
Clients”.
Mohanty, Girishbala (2007), “Industrial Psychology and Organizational
Behaviours”, First Edition, Reprinted 2007, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Paras Pharmasuticals, “Balance Sheet of the Year 2006-07”, Paras
Pharmasuticals Limited, Mohali.
“www.Parasbpo.com”, Website of Paras Pharmasuticals Limited.
77
78
Annexure – ‘I’
9. Questionnaire for the Employees of Paras Pharmaceuticals to Assess Employee Absenteeism in the Company
Note:
1. The study is purely for the academic purpose and the findings will not be used for any other purpose. You may kindly give your frank views.
2. Please Tick mark the most appropriate answer.
Questions
79
1. In which division are you working?
1) HR 3) Finance 2) Marketing 4) Working class
2 What is your marital status?1) Married 2) Unmarried
3. What is your age group? 1) Above 25 3) More than 40 2) 25-40
4 Is the procedure simplified for availing leave? 1) Yes 2) No
5. Have you ever faced any problem while processing your leave applications?1) Yes 2) No
6. Do you think that the leave entitlement is sufficient to meet your general requirements in a year? 1) Yes 2) No
7. Due to which of the following reasons you take maximum leave?1) Professional Stress 3) Social Cause 2) Personal or family 4) Further studies sickness
8 Have you ever found any discrimination in leave sanction?.1) Yes 2) No
9. Does any motivational leave culture exists in your organization? 1) Yes 2) No
10.Do you share your personal problems with your superiors in the organization? 1) Yes 2) No
11.Are you satisfied with the working conditions? 1) Yes 2) No
12.How is your relation with your immediate boss?1) Good 2) Bad
13.Are you satisfied with the medical & transport facilities?
80
1) Yes 2) No
14.Do you normally take prior permission from your boss before proceeding on leave? 1) Yes 2) No
15.How much is the distance you travel from residence to workplace?1) 00 – 05 kms 3) 10-15 kms 2) 05 – 10 Kms. 4) above 15 Kms
___________________________________________________________________________Name of Employee (Optional)_________________________________________Designation (Optional)______________________________________________Signature (Optional) ________________________________________________
81