Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
-
Upload
thomas-beck -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
September 2000
Rick Alfvin, Eastman KodakSlide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/321r0
Submission
NOTE: Update all red fields replacing with your information; they are required. This is a manual update in appropriatefields. All Blue fields are informational and are to be deleted. Black stays. After updating delete this box/paragraph.
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: TG3 Rank Order Voting Process DescriptionDate Submitted: 21 September, 2000Source: Rick Alfvin, Eastman Kodak CompanyAddress 4545 East River Road, 3/L/RV 00898, Rochester, NY 14650-0898Voice: (716) 781-9024, FAX: (716) 781-9733, E-Mail: [email protected]
Re:
Abstract: Rank Voting Process Description.
Purpose: This is an informative document intended to communicate a method of rank order voting.
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
September 2000
Rick Alfvin, Eastman KodakSlide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/321r0
Submission
Simple Rank Voting
VOTEProposal A 5Proposal B 1Proposal C 6Proposal D 8Proposal E 4Proposal F 2Proposal G 7Proposal H 3
•Simple rank order voting
•Allocate n votes (points)
• 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
•Use number value only once
•Sum votes for each proposal
•Top 50% remain
•Final proposal requires 75% affirmation (vote of confidence)