Programa Isocal Taller (1)

Stationary Source Information

Plant Name Ladrillera El Rubí, Tunja

Fuel Type Carbon

Sampling Location Chimenea Horno

Operator Universidad de la SalleDate 15 de Octubre de 2009

Project #

Base Run Number R

# of Ports Available 4

# of Ports Used 4

Port Inside Diameter 0.1

Circular Stack? 1

Rectangular Stack? 1

Test Equipment Information

Meter Box Number Apex 572Meter Calibration Factor (Y) 0.994Orifice Meter Coefficient (DH@) 48.960 mm H2O

Pitot Identification

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.850Orsat Identification

Nozzle Number 30Nozzle Diameter (Dn) 6.200 mm

Probe Number

Probe Length 1.83 m

Liner Material Ac. Inox.Sample Case / Oven Number

Impinger Case Number

Acetone Lot Number

Testing Company Information

Company Name Universidad de la SalleAddress Calle 10 concarrera 2City State Zip Country BogotáPhone Number 3 68 85 96 /97 /98Fax Number 91-2 44 83 80

METHOD 1 - SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR STATIONARY SOURCES

Plant Name Ladrillera El Rubí, Tunja Date 15 de octubre de 2009

Sampling Location Chimenea Horno Project #

Operator Universidad de la Salle # of Ports Available 4

Stack Type Circular # of Ports Used 2

Stack Size Large Port Inside Diameter 0.1

Circular Stack or Duct Diameter

Distance to Far Wall of Stack (Lfw) 2.87 m

Distance to Near Wall of Stack (Lnw) 0.39 m

Diameter of Stack (=Lfw - Lnw) (D) 2.48 m

Area of Stack (=3.14(D/2/Cunits)2) (As) 4.831 m2

Distance from Port to Disturbances

Distance Upstream (A) 8.00 m

Diameters Upstream (=B/D) (A/D) diameters

Distance Downstream (B) 14.00 m

Diameters Downstream (=A/D) (B/D) diameters

Number of Traverse Points Required

Diameters to Minimum Number of1

Flow Disturbance Traverse Points

Up Down Particulate Velocity

Stream Stream Points Points2.00-4.99 0.50-1.24 24 165.00-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 166.00-6.99 1.50-1.74 16 127.00-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12>= 8.00 >=2.00 8 or 122 8 or 122

Upstream Spec

Downstream Spec

Traverse Pts Required

and Downstream conditions, then use the larger Number. Number of Traverse Points Used

2 Ports by 12 Across

12 for Circular Stacks over 24 inches 24 Pts Used 16 Required0 Particulate 0 Velocity

Traverse Point Locations

Fraction Distance Distance

Traverse of from Including

Point Stack Inside Nipple

Number Diameter Wall Length

m m123456789

101112

1 Check the Minimum Number of Points for the Upstream

2 8 for Circular Stacks 12 to 24 inches

METHOD 1 - SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR STATIONARY SOURCES

15 de octubre de 2009

METHOD 2 - DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE

Plant Name Ladrillera El Rubí, Tunja Date 15 de OCTUBRE de 2009


Operator # of Ports Used 2

Stack Type Circular Pitot Identification

Pitot Leak Check 1 PreTest 0 PostTest Pitot Coefficient (Cp) 0.85

Stack Dimensions Velocity Traverse Data

Diameter or Length of Stack (D) 2.48 m Run Number R-1Width of Stack (W) m Run Time

Area of Stack (As) 4.831 m2 Traverse Velocity Stack Local

Point Head Temp Velocity

Pressures (Dp) (ts) (vs)l

Barometric Pressure (Pb) 542.00 mm Hg mm H2O °C m/sec

Static Pressure (Pstatic) 4.16 mm H2O 1A 1.00 74Absolute Stack Pressure (Ps) 542.31 mm Hg 2A 3.00 75

3A 4.50 75Stack Gas Composition 4A 4.00 77

Composition Data: Actual 1 Estimate 0 5A 5.00 77Carbon Dioxide Concentration (%CO2) % 6A 5.50 75Oxygen Concentration (%O2) % 7A 6.00 75Carbon Monoxide Concentration (%CO) % 8A 6.00 75Nitrogen Concentration (%N2) % 9A 4.00 75Stack Moisture Content (Bws) 10A 2.50 74Stack Dry Molecular Weight (Md) g/g-mole 11A 1.50 74Stack Wet Molecular Weight (Ms) g/g-mole 12A 1.00 74

1B 0.50 63Results 2B 0.50 64

Average Stack Gas Velocity (vs) m/sec 3B 1.00 62Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (Qsd) dscm/hr 4B 1.50 68Dry Standard Volumetric Flow Rate (Qsd) dscm/min 5B 2.00 69

6B 2.50 70Stack Cross Section Schematic 7B 3.00 72

8B 3.50 719B 1.00 7210B 2.00 7211B 1.00 7212B 1.50 71

Average1

Dp, or, (Dp)1/2avg = 1/nS(Dp1/2)

Formulas Used

As = DW/Ku for Rectangular Stacks Ts(avg) = 1/nSts + Tu

As = (p(D/2)2)/Ku for Circular Stacks where Tu = 273 oK for metric units

where Ku = 1 for metric units where Tu = 460 oR for English units

where Ku = 144 (in2/ft2) for English units vs = KpCp(Dp)1/2avg (Ts(avg)/(PsMs))1/2

Ps = Pbar + Pstatic/13.6 where Kp = 34.97 for metric units

%N2 = 100 - %CO2 - %O2 - %CO where Kp = 85.49 for English units

Md = .44(%CO2) + .32(%O2 ) + .28(%N2 + %CO) Qsd = 3600(1 - Bws)vsAs(Tstd/Ts(avg))(Ps/Pstd)

Ms = Md(1 - Bws) + 18Bws where Tstd = 293 oK, Pstd = 760 mm Hg, for metric units

(Dp)1/2avg = 1/nS(Dp1/2) where Tstd = 528 oR, Pstd = 29.92 in Hg, for English units

1 Please report the average of the square roots of

METHOD 3 - GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT

Plant Name Ladrillera El Rubí, Tunja Date 15 de octubre de 2009



Fuel Type Carbon Minimum Fuel Factor Maximum Fuel Factor

Orsat Leak Check 1 PreTest 0 PostTest Orsat Identification

Gas Analysis Data

Run Number R-1 Run Start Time 15:35 Run Stop Time 18:00Sample Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Dry Molecular

Analysis Dioxide Oxygen Monoxide Dioxide Oxygen Monoxide Nitrogen Molecular Weight

Time Volume Volume Volume Concentra. Concentra. Concentra. Concentra. Weight Deviation

(VCO2) (VO2) (VCO) (%CO2) (%O2) (%CO) (%N2) (Md) (DMd)

hh:mm ml ml ml percent percent percent percent g/g-mole g/g-mole4.2 14.0 14.5 0.004.1 13.9 14.4 0.003.9 13.8 14.3 0.00

Results AveragesAverage Calculated Fuel Factor (Fo)avg Molecular Wt Deviation < 0.3? 1Average Excess Air (%EA)avg percent Fuel Factor in Handbook Range? 0

Gas Analysis Data

Run Number R-2 Run Start Time Run Stop Time

Sample Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Dry Molecular




hh:mm ml ml ml percent percent percent percent g/g-mole g/g-mole


Gas Analysis Data


Sample Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Dry Molecular




hh:mm ml ml ml percent percent percent percent g/g-mole g/g-mole


Fuel Factor Fo Formulas Used

Fuel Type Minimum Maximum %CO2 = VCO2

Coal, Anthracite 1.016 1.130 %O2 = VO2 - VCO2

Coal, Lignite 1.016 1.130 %CO = VCO - VO2

Coal, Bituminous 1.083 1.230 %N2 = 100 - %CO2 - %O2 - %CO

Oil, Distillate 1.260 1.413 Md = .44(%CO2)+ .32(%O2 )+ .28(%N2 + %CO)

Oil, Residual 1.210 1.370 DMd = Md - MdavgGas, Natural 1.600 1.836 Fo = (20.9 - %O2 - .5%CO)/(%CO2 + %CO)

Gas, Propane 1.434 1.586 %EA=100(%O2-.5%CO)/(.264%NO2-(%O2-.5%CO))

Gas, Butane 1.405 1.553Wood 1.000 1.120Wood Bark 1.003 1.130

METHOD 4 - DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES

Plant Name Date 15 de octubre de 2009



Stack Type Circular Meter Box Number Apex 572

Train Leak Check 1 PreTest 0 PostTest Meter Cal Factor (Y) 1.01

Moisture Content Data


Total Meter Volume (Vm) 1.269 dcm Barometric Pressure (Pb) 542.00 mm Hg

Avg Meter Temp (tm)avg 23 Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) 4.16 mm H2O

Avg Stack Temp (ts)avg 72 Avg Orifice Pressure (DH)avg 2.67 mm H2O

Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 Impinger 5 Impinger 6 Impinger 7

ml ml ml g ml ml g

Contents

Final Value (Vf),(Wf) 113.00 107.00 0.00 107.62Initial Value (Vi),(Wi) 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00Net Value (Vn),(Wn)

Results

Total Volume (Vt) ml Water Vol Condensed (Vwc(std)) scm

Total Weight (Wt) g Water Vol Weighed (Vwsg(std)) scm

Std Meter Volume (Vm(std)) dscm Sat. Moisture Content (Bws(svp)) %

Calc Moisture Content (Bws(calc)) % Final Moisture Content (Bws) %



Total Meter Volume (Vm) dcm Barometric Pressure (Pb) 542.00 mm Hg

Avg Meter Temp (tm)avg Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) 4.16 mm H2O

Avg Stack Temp (ts)avg Avg Orifice Pressure (DH)avg 2.67 mm H2O


ml ml ml g ml ml ml

Contents

Final Value (Vf),(Wf)

Initial Value (Vi),(Wi)

Net Value (Vn),(Wn)

Results

Total Volume (Vt) 0.00 ml Water Vol Condensed (Vwc(std)) 0.000 scm

Total Weight (Wt) 0.00 g Water Vol Weighed (Vwsg(std)) 0.000 scm


Calc Moisture Content (Bws) % Final Moisture Content (Bws) %



Total Meter Volume (Vm) dcm Barometric Pressure (Pb) 542.00 mm Hg

Avg Meter Temp (tm)avg Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) 4.15 mm H2O

Avg Stack Temp (ts)avg Avg Orifice Pressure (DH)avg mm H2O


ml ml ml g ml ml ml

Contents

Final Value (Vf),(Wf)

Initial Value (Vi),(Wi)

Net Value (Vn),(Wn)

Results

Total Volume (Vt) 0.00 ml Water Vol Condensed (Vwc(std)) 0.000 scm

Total Weight (Wt) 0.00 g Water Vol Weighed (Vwsg(std)) 0.000 scm


Calc Moisture Content (Bws) % Final Moisture Content (Bws) %

oC

oC

oC

oC

oC

oC

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING DATA

Plant Name Ladrillera El Rubí, Tunja

Sampling Location Chimenea Horno

Operator

# of Points Across 12

Slide Rule Set-Up

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.850Avg Stack Temp (ts) 72Avg Gas Meter Temp (tm) 24DH @ 0.75 SCFM (DH@) 49.78 mm H2O

Avg Pitot Tube Diff. Pressure (Dpavg) 9.62 mm H2O

Stack Moisture Content (Bws) 5.0 %

Stack Dry Molecular Weight (Mds) 28.94 g/g-mole

Estimated Orifice Flow Rate (Qm) 21.20 acmm

DP to DH Isokinetic Factor (K) 3.30

Pressures

Barometric Pressure (Pb) 542.00 mm Hg

Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) 4.15 mm H2O

Absolute Stack Pressure (Ps) 542.31 mm Hg

Absolute Meter Pressure (Pm) 545.66 mm Hg

Dry Gas Desired Actual

Traverse Sampling Clock Meter Velocity Orifice Orifice

Point # Time Time Reading Head DH DH(Q) (Vm) (Dp) (DH) (DH)

min hr:min m3 mm H2O mm H2O mm H2O1B 0.0 15:35 21.662 5.50 18.15 18.002B 2.5 21.702 9.00 29.70 30.003B 5.0 21.749 11.50 37.95 38.004B 7.5 21.803 12.00 39.60 39.505B 10.0 21.861 13.00 42.90 43.006B 12.5 21.912 14.50 47.85 48.007B 15.0 21.978 15.00 49.50 49.508B 17.5 22.037 14.50 47.85 48.009B 20.0 22.099 13.00 42.90 43.00

10B 22.5 22.156 11.00 36.30 36.0011B 25.0 22.208 6.00 19.80 20.0012B 27.5 16:10 22.245 4.00 13.20 13.001A 30.0 17:25 22.280 5.00 16.50 16.502A 32.5 22.315 8.50 28.05 28.003A 35.0 22.361 11.00 36.30 36.004A 37.5 22.413 12.50 41.25 41.005A 40.0 22.472 14.50 47.85 48.006A 42.5 22.531 15.00 49.50 49.507A 45.0 22.595 16.00 52.80 53.008A 47.5 22.659 16.00 52.80 53.009A 50.0 22.720 16.00 52.80 53.00

10A 52.5 22.782 12.50 41.25 41.0011A 55.0 22.840 10.00 33.00 33.0012A 57.5 22.889 7.00 23.10 23.00

Ultimo 60.0 18:00 22.931

oC

oC

Final Values 60.0 18:00 22.931Average Values 11.38 37.54

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING DATA

Date 19 de enero de 1998

Project #

Run # R-1# of Ports Used 2

Sampling Equipment

Meter # Apex 572Meter Calibration Factor (Y) 1.010Nozzle # 30Actual Nozzle Diameter (Dna) 6.200 mm

Ideal Nozzle Diameter (Dni) 6.335 mm

Probe # / Length 1.83 m

Liner Material Ac. Inox.Sample Case / Oven #

Impinger Case #

DVm Leak Checks

Pre m3/min @ mm Hg

Post m3/min @ mm Hg

DVm < 0.00057 m3/min Yes?

Pitot OK? Orsat OK?

Meter Meter Impinger Square

Stack Inlet Outlet Filter Exit Pump Root

Temp Temp Temp Temp Temp Vacuum DP(ts) (tmi) (tmo) (Dp1/2)

mm Hg (mm H2O)1/268 24 24 150 12 1.2 2.3570 24 24 150 12 1.5 3.0073 24 24 150 12 2.0 3.3976 24 24 150 12 2.2 3.4676 24 24 152 12 2.2 3.6176 24 24 151 13 2.5 3.8177 24 24 152 13 2.5 3.8777 24 24 152 12 2.5 3.8177 24 24 152 12 2.5 3.6176 24 24 150 13 2.0 3.3275 24 24 151 13 1.5 2.4574 24 24 151 13 1.0 2.0072 24 24 151 13 1.0 2.2476 24 24 151 12 1.2 1.5078 24 24 152 12 2.0 2.0078 24 24 152 12 2.5 2.0078 24 24 151 12 2.5 2.5079 25 25 151 11 3.0 3.8780 25 25 152 11 3.0 4.0080 25 25 152 12 3.0 4.0079 25 25 151 12 3.0 4.0078 25 25 150 12 2.5 3.5478 25 25 150 13 2.0 3.1677 25 25 151 13 2.0 2.65

oC oC oC oC oC

Maximum Vacuum 3.0 Final Values

76 24 24 151 12 3.0924

Local Cumulative Cumulative

Stack Meter Percent

Velocity Volume IsoKinetic

(vs)l (Vm)std (I)

m/sec scm %10.37 0.029 104.113.31 0.062 99.615.11 0.101 99.015.50 0.142 100.216.14 0.179 97.417.04 0.226 99.317.36 0.268 98.517.06 0.312 98.816.16 0.353 98.714.84 0.390 98.610.95 0.417 98.28.92 0.442 98.79.95 0.466 98.5

13.05 0.499 98.514.88 0.536 98.415.87 0.579 98.817.09 0.621 98.617.41 0.667 98.818.00 0.712 98.918.00 0.756 98.617.98 0.800 98.515.87 0.841 98.614.19 0.876 98.511.86 0.906 98.5

Final Values 0.906 98.514.87

METHOD 5 - SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA SHEET

Plant Name Ladrillera El Rubí, Tunja Date


Operator Acetone Lot Number

Run History Data

Run Number R-1 R-2 R-3Run Start Time 15:35 (hh:mm)

Run Stop Time 18:00 (hh:mm)

Train Prepared By rjrTrain Recovered By rjrRecovery Date 1/19/1998 (mm/dd/yy)

Relinquished By

Received By C.Q.Relinquished Date (mm/dd/yy)

Relinquished Time (hh:mm)

Equipment Identification Numbers

Filter 117Acetone Wash 10Silica Gel 10Impinger Case 12

Sample Box 1

Oven 1


Impingers 1, 2, and 3 - Water Volume

Final Volume (Vf) 216.0 ml

Initial Volume (Vi) 200.0 ml

Net Volume (Vn) 16.0 ml

Comments

Impinger 4 - Silica Gel Weight

Final Weight (Wf) 206.7 g

Initial Weight (Wi) 200.0 g

Net Weight (Wn) 6.7 g

Comments

Total Water Collected

Total Volume (Vlc) 22.7 g

Formulas Used

Vn = Vf - Vi Wn = Wf - Wi Vlc = Vn + Wn/rw where rw = .9982 g/ml

METHOD 5 - SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA SHEET

19 de enero de 1998

Acetone Lot Number

METHOD 5 - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS - RESULTS

Plant Name Ladrillera El Rubí, Tunja Date


Operator Universidad de La Salle Stack Type

Historical Data

Run Number R-1 R-1 R-1

Run Start Time

Run Stop Time 18:00Meter Calibration Factor (Y) 1.010 1.010 1.010Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.850 0.850 0.850Actual Nozzle Diameter (Dna) 6.200 6.200 6.200

Stack Test Data

Initial Meter Volume (Vm)i 21.662Final Meter Volume (Vm)f 22.931Total Meter Volume (Vm) 1.269Total Sampling Time (Q) 60.0

Average Meter Temperature (tm)avg 24.3

Average Stack Temperature (ts)avg 76.2Barometric Pressure (Pb) 542.00 542.00 542.00Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) 4.15 4.15 4.15Absolute Stack Pressure (Ps) 542.31 542.31 542.31Average Orifice Pressure Drop (DH)avg 37.54Absolute Meter Pressure (Pm) 544.76Avg Square Root Pitot Pressure (Dp1/2)avg 3.09


Impingers 1-3 Water Volume Gain (Vn) 16.0Impinger 4 Silica Gel Weight Gain (Wn) 6.7Total Water Volume Collected (Vlc) 22.7Standard Water Vapor Volume (Vw)std 0.030Standard Meter Volume (Vm)std 0.906Calculated Stack Moisture (Bws(calc)) 3.2Saturated Stack Moisture (Bws(svp)) 55.8Reported Stack Moisture Content (Bws) 3.2

Gas Analysis Data

Carbon Dioxide Percentage (%CO2) 3.9Oxygen Percentage (%O2) 9.9Carbon Monoxide Percentage (%CO) 0.4Nitrogen Percentage (%N2) 85.8Dry Gas Molecular Weight (Md) 29.02Wet Stack Gas Molecular Weight (Ms) 28.66Calculated Fuel Factor (Fo) 2.512Percent Excess Air (%EA) 74.9

Volumetric Flow Rate Data

Average Stack Gas Velocity (vs) 13.76Stack Cross-Sectional Area (As) 0.66 0.66 0.66Actual Stack Flow Rate (Qa) 549Dry Standard Stack Flow Rate (Qsd) 318Percent of Isokinetic Rate (I) 104.5

Emission Rate Data

Mass of Particulate on Filter (mf) 22.6

Mass of Particulate in Acetone (ma') 15.5Mass due to Acetone Blank (Wa) 0.0Total Mass of Particulates (mn) 38.1Stack Particulate Concentration (cs) 0.042Stack Particulate Concentration (cs) 0.649Particulate Emission Rate (E) 0.80

METHOD 5 - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS - RESULTS

15 de Octubre de 2004

Circular

Historical Data

Average

hh:mm

hh:mm

mm

Stack Test Data

m3

m3

1.269 m3

60.0 min

24.3

76.2542.00 mm Hg

4.15 mm H2O

542.31 mm Hg

37.54 mm H2O

544.76 mm Hg

3.09 (mm H2O)1/2


16.0 ml

6.7 g

22.7 ml

0.030 scm

0.906 dscm

3.2 %

55.8 %

3.2 %

Gas Analysis Data

3.9 %

9.9 %

0.4 %

85.8 %

29.02 g/g-mole

28.66 g/g-mole

2.51274.9 %

Volumetric Flow Rate Data

13.76 m/sec

m2

549 acmm

318 dscmm

104.5 %

Emission Rate Data

22.6 mg

oC

oC

15.5 mg

0.0 mg

38.1 mg

0.042 g/dscm

0.649 gr/dscm

0.80 kg/hr

Programa Isocal Taller (1)

Documents

Transcript of Programa Isocal Taller (1)