Program Evaluation System - Columbia Universitydz2266/Teaching_Evaluations_DanyanZha.pdf ·...

Program Evaluation System

Title: A&S Spring 2018 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/23/2018 - 05/03/2018Course: ECONW3211_002_2018_1 / INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS

Responses: 36/72 - 50.00%

Number of Participants: 72Enrollment of All Students: 72

Instructors: Anna Catarina Musatti

TA Graph Report for: Danyan Zha

What is your overall assessment of the effectiveness of the teaching assistant?

N=15

Poor 0 (0%) 1Fair 0 (0%) 2Good 7 (47%) 3Very good 4 (27%) 4Excellent 4 (27%) 5

6 N/A 0 (0%)

Median 4 Std Dev 0.86Interpolated Median 3.63Mean 3.80

1

of 1


Title: A&S Spring 2018 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/23/2018 - 05/03/2018Responses: 36/72 - 50.00%Course: ECONW3211_002_2018_1 / INTERMEDIATE

MICROECONOMICSNumber of Participants: 72

Enrollment of All Students: 72 Instructors: Anna Catarina Musatti

TA Concise Report for: Danyan Zha

Poo

r

Goo

d

Fair

Ver

y go

od

Exc

elle

nt

N/A # of

R

espo

nses

Med

ian

IMed

ian

Mea

nS

t.Dev


0 0 7 4 4 150% 0% 47% 27% 27%

1 00%

43.63

3.80 0.86

4 3.803.63 0.86


Title: A&S Spring 2018 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/23/2018 - 05/03/2018Course: ECONW3211_002_2018_1 / INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS Responses: 36/72 - 50.00%Instructors: Anna Catarina Musatti Enrollment of Registered Students:72

Enrollment of All Students:72

TA Comments Report for: Danyan Zha

What are the strengths and weaknesses of your teaching assistant (discussion section leader, lab section leader, grader, or other assistant) as an instructor, and how might his or her teaching be improved?

Q1

She was very effective in discussion section. She really got people to participate and apply themselves to the

work they didn't understand. Cold calling was not my favorite, but she intended it well.

-

Very strong understanding of the course, was very good at conveying necessary information in recitation. Very

nice. Not great english though.

-

She was very smart. She wanted the class to succeed but sometimes called on people and forced them to

solve questions that they obviously were not comfortable with. In general, a good experience

-

She is very nice and tries to help. She seems a little nervous at time but it didn't affect her teaching too much.-

Pretty clear teaching. Small recitation size helps-

Very helpful and understanding TA who is always willing to help a student in need.-

Very helpful receptions - involved the students and guided us when we needed it.-

Very clear explanations, great energy, got the students involved in the problem solving during the recitation.-

Danyan is a good TA. She takes us into the maths part of micro very well.-

Danyan was a very good TA. She makes time for questions and schedules office hour time in a flexible

manner. Danyan is very informative and encourages participation in her recitation section. Attending

Danyan's recitation and office hours has helped me immensely in this course.

-


Title: A&S Fall 2017 Standard Evaluation Dates: 12/04/2017 - 12/14/2017Course: ECONW4020_001_2017_3 / ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION

Responses: 5/18 - 27.78%


Instructors: Pierre A Chiappori



N=4

Poor 1 (25%) 1Fair 0 (0%) 2Good 0 (0%) 3Very good 1 (25%) 4Excellent 2 (50%) 5

6 N/A 0 (0%)

Median 4.5 Std Dev 1.89Interpolated Median 4.50Mean 3.75

1

Page 1 of 1


Title: A&S Fall 2017 Standard Evaluation Dates: 12/04/2017 - 12/14/2017Responses: 5/18 - 27.78%Course: ECONW4020_001_2017_3 / ECONOMICS OF

INFORMATIONNumber of Participants: 18

Enrollment of All Students: 18 Instructors: Pierre A Chiappori


Poo

r

Goo

d

Fair

Ver

y go

od

Exc

elle

nt

N/A # of

R

espo

nses

Med

ian

IMed

ian

Mea

nS

t.Dev


1 0 0 1 2 425% 0% 0% 25% 50%

1 00%

4.54.50

3.75 1.89

4.5 3.754.50 1.89


Title: A&S Fall 2017 Standard Evaluation Dates: 12/04/2017 - 12/14/2017Course: ECONW4020_001_2017_3 / ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION Responses: 5/18 - 27.78%Instructors: Pierre A Chiappori Enrollment of Registered Students:18




Q1

Danyan was very good at going through problem sets and helping to really understand the math behind some

of what we covered in class. The only issue was sometimes she got a little confused while going through

questions and had to take a bit longer to correctly answer them. Her teaching might be improved by changing

the pacing a little bit - sometimes we would go a little slow on what (I thought) were the easy parts of

problem sets while racing over some of the math. Even though algebra can be tedious, I find going through

the algebra while solving problems very helpful, otherwise we just skip to the answer and I have to trust the

algebra was done correctly.

-

Very on top of things-

Grading was far too harsh in the midterm.-

Danyan helps me a lot during the study of this course. She is able to explain the ideas of each class even

better than professor in her office hour. Also, the quality of her recitation in very decent, and she explain the

concept and the solution methodically in her recitation.

-


Title: A&S Spring 2017 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/24/2017 - 05/04/2017Course: ECONW4260_001_2017_1 / MARKET DESIGN Responses: 26/65 - 40.00%


Instructors: Guillaume G. Haeringer



N=9

No basis for comment

0 (0%) 1

Poor 0 (0%) 2Fair 2 (22%) 3Good 2 (22%) 4Very Good 3 (33%) 5Excellent 2 (22%) 6


1

Page 1 of 1


Title: A&S Spring 2017 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/24/2017 - 05/04/2017Responses: 26/65 - 40.00%Course: ECONW4260_001_2017_1 / MARKET DESIGN

Number of Participants: 65 Enrollment of All Students: 66

Instructors: Guillaume G. Haeringer


No

basi

s fo

r co

mm

ent

Fair

Poo

r

Goo

d

Ver

y G

ood

Exc

elle

nt

# of

R

espo

nses

Med

ian

IMed

ian

Mea

nS

t.Dev


0 0 2 2 3 90% 0% 22% 22% 33%

1 222%

54.67

4.56 1.13

5 4.564.67 1.13


Title: A&S Spring 2017 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/24/2017 - 05/04/2017Course: ECONW4260_001_2017_1 / MARKET DESIGN Responses: 26/65 - 40.00%Instructors: Guillaume G. Haeringer Enrollment of Registered Students:65




Q1

it is ok-

very helpful-

Danyan is helpful and explains clearly whenever we have questions. I mainly went to her recitations because

they provided a good review of material learned in class.

-

She's extremely thorough and very helpful!! Although her speech sometimes makes for difficult

communication, her efforts and her intelligence is very much appreciated.

-

She is well organized and saved my life comparing to professor.-


Title: A&S Spring 2016 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/25/2016 - 05/06/2016Course: ECONW4260_001_2016_1 / MARKET DESIGN Responses: 25/38 - 65.79%


Instructors: Yeon-Koo Che



N=7

No basis for comment

0 (0%) 1

Poor 1 (14%) 2Fair 2 (29%) 3Good 0 (0%) 4Very Good 1 (14%) 5Excellent 3 (43%) 6


1

Page 1 of 1


Title: A&S Spring 2016 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/25/2016 - 05/06/2016Responses: 25/38 - 65.79%Course: ECONW4260_001_2016_1 / MARKET DESIGN

Number of Participants: 38 Enrollment of All Students: 38

Instructors: Yeon-Koo Che


No

basi

s fo

r co

mm

ent

Fair

Poo

r

Goo

d

Ver

y G

ood

Exc

elle

nt

# of

R

espo

nses

Med

ian

IMed

ian

Mea

nS

t.Dev


0 1 2 0 1 70% 14% 29% 0% 14%

1 343%

55.00

4.43 1.72

5 4.435.00 1.72


Title: A&S Spring 2016 Standard Evaluation Dates: 04/25/2016 - 05/06/2016Course: ECONW4260_001_2016_1 / MARKET DESIGN Responses: 25/38 - 65.79%Instructors: Yeon-Koo Che Enrollment of Registered Students:38




Q1

Rude-

Danyan was so patient and willing to thoroughly explain different aspects of the class.-

Danyan was also very helpful and very responsive-

Danyan truly stands out as an exceptional TA. She is very kind and approachable, and on various occasions I

overheard her accommodate other students by scheduling time outside her typical office hours to answer their

additional questions. She was quick in getting our assignments graded, and I appreciate that. I met with

Danyan almost every week at her office hours, and I cannot say enough about how helpful she was in

answering questions about that week's lecture material. I went to her office hours just to stay on top of the

material and I think I ended up understanding the material even better than was expected because of how

helpful she was. She was skilled both at explaining detailed, specific questions as well as taking a step back

and connecting concepts and helping to see more broadly how theories fit together or differed. She also

helped me with any questions I had on the problem sets; although I worked through most of these problems

on my own, any time I got stuck or needed a guide, she was able to help me see my error or direct me to a

more effective path. She knew and understood the material very well and did an excellent job articulating

clearly, and as a result she could answer questions quickly without me having to rephrase. She also was very

helpful for the case study, as she helped me talk through papers and ideas. Her enthusiasm as a TA was

noticeable--she clearly cares about her students and about helping them understand the material. She was

always willing to stay a little bit longer to finish a discussion, even if her office hours had ended, and she was

also responsive by email. She deserves any TA award given by the economics department. Thank you Danyan!

-

Program Evaluation System - Columbia Universitydz2266/Teaching_Evaluations_DanyanZha.pdf ·...

Documents

Transcript of Program Evaluation System - Columbia Universitydz2266/Teaching_Evaluations_DanyanZha.pdf ·...