Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

download Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

of 29

Transcript of Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    1/29

    Trainee 1 Trainee 2

    1. Clarity of program objectives 4 3

    2. Organization of course activities 4 3

    3. Scheduling of activities and time allotment 3 1

    4. Attinment of program objectives 4 2

    1. Course content vis--vis the program objectives 4 3

    2. Sequencing of the course contents 4 3

    3. Sufficiency of information 4 3

    4. Relevance of course content vis--vis need 4 3

    1. Effectiveness of selected method 4 3

    2. Appropriateness to the course activities 4 3

    1. Adequacy of provided supplies and materials 4 3

    2. Timeliness of provision of supplies and materials 4 3

    3. Availability of training equipment and materials 4 3

    4. Conduciveness of the training venue to learning 4 4

    5. Appropriateness of the physical layout of the venue 3 3

    6. Overall accommodation 4 3

    7. Secretariat service 4 2

    4

    1. Knowledge of the subject matter 4 4

    2. Ability to communicate ideas 4 4

    3. Ability to arouse interest 4 4

    4. Ability to encourage participation 4 4

    5. Ability to organise lecture 4 4

    6. Ability to answer questions 4 4

    7. Openness to suggestions and comments 4 4

    8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking 4 4

    9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas 4 4

    10. Use of training equipment 4 4

    11. Comprehensiveness of lecture 4 4

    PROGRAM EVALUATION ANALYSIS

    A. Program Design and Organization

    D. Program Administration and Management

    E. Facilitator/Trainer (Redilyn C. Agub)

    B. Course Content

    C. Training Methodology

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    2/29

    12. Ability to provide adequate feedback 4 4

    13. Ability to provide practical exercises 4 4

    1. Knowledge of the subject matter 4 4

    2. Ability to communicate ideas 4 43. Ability to arouse interest 4 4

    4. Ability to encourage participation 4 4

    5. Ability to organise lecture 4 4

    6. Ability to answer questions 4 4

    7. Openness to suggestions and comments 4 4

    8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking 4 4

    9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas 4 4

    10. Use of training equipment 4 4

    11. Comprehensiveness of lecture 4 412. Ability to provide adequate feedback 4 4

    13. Ability to provide practical exercises 4 4

    1. Knowledge of the subject matter 4 4

    2. Ability to communicate ideas 4 4

    3. Ability to arouse interest 4 4

    4. Ability to encourage participation 4 4

    5. Ability to organise lecture 4 46. Ability to answer questions 4 4

    7. Openness to suggestions and comments 4 4

    8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking 4 4

    9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas 4 4

    10. Use of training equipment 4 4

    11. Comprehensiveness of lecture 4 4

    12. Ability to provide adequate feedback 4 4

    13. Ability to provide practical exercises 4 4

    1. Knowledge of the subject matter 4 4

    2. Ability to communicate ideas 4 4

    3. Ability to arouse interest 4 4

    4. Ability to encourage participation 4 4

    5. Ability to organise lecture 4 4

    6. Ability to answer questions 4 4

    Facilitator/Trainer (Gervacio Faustino)

    Facilitator/Trainer (Alfonso P. Francisco)

    Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F. Cabalu)

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    3/29

    7. Openness to suggestions and comments 4 4

    8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking 4 4

    9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas 4 4

    10. Use of training equipment 4 4

    11. Comprehensiveness of lecture 4 4

    12. Ability to provide adequate feedback 4 413. Ability to provide practical exercises 4 4

    Prepared by:

    KATHRINE RAMOS - ANGELES

    Sr. TESD Specialist

    TESDA PTC Malolos

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    4/29

    Trainee 3 Trainee 4 Trainee 5 Average Descriptive Rating

    4 5 5 4.20 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3 5 3 3.00 Good / Adequate

    4 5 4 3.80 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.75 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 3 3.80 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.93 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 4 4.20 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 3 3.60 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 5 3 3.60 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.85 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    5/29

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    5 4 4.25 Very Good

    4.25 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4 4.00 Very Good

    4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    6/29

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good

    4 4.00 Very Good4 4.00 Very Good

    4.02 Very Good / Very SatisfactoryAverage for the whole evaluation:

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    7/29

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    8/29

    4.00 Very Good

    4.00 Very Good

    4.00 Very Good

    "

    All items got a rating of 4.00 or "Very good"

    The item on

    "Facilitator/Trainer (Gervacio

    The item on"Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F.

    Cabalu)" got an average rating

    of 4.0 or "Very Good".

    The item on "

    Facilitator/Trainer (Alfonso P.

    Francisco)" got an average

    rating of 4.00 or "Very Good".

    All Items got a rating of 4.00 or "Very Good"

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    9/29

    .

    Good" respectively.

    Faustino)" got an average

    rating of 4.00 or "Very Good".

    As a whole, the rating given to the program is 4.23 or

    "Very Good/Very Satisfactory".

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    10/29

    1 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.01 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.02 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.03 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.04 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.05 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.06 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.07 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.08 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.09 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.1 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.11 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.12 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.13 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.14 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.15 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.16 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.17 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.18 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.19 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.2 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.21 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.22 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.23 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.24 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.25 Poor / Unsatisfactory1.26 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.27 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.28 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.29 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.3 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.31 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.32 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.33 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.34 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.35 Poor / Unsatisfactory1.36 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.37 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.38 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.39 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.4 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.41 Poor / Unsatisfactory

    1.42 Poor / Unsatisfactory

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    11/29

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    12/29

    1.86 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.87 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.88 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.89 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.9 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.91 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.92 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.93 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.94 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.95 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.96 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.97 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.98 Fair / Satisfactory

    1.99 Fair / Satisfactory

    2 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.01 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.02 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.03 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.04 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.05 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.06 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.07 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.08 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.09 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.1 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.11 Fair / Satisfactory2.12 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.13 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.14 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.15 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.16 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.17 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.18 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.19 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.2 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.21 Fair / Satisfactory2.22 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.23 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.24 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.25 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.26 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.27 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.28 Fair / Satisfactory

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    13/29

    2.29 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.3 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.31 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.32 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.33 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.34 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.35 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.36 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.37 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.38 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.39 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.4 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.41 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.42 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.43 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.44 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.45 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.46 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.47 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.48 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.49 Fair / Satisfactory

    2.5 Good / Adequate

    2.51 Good / Adequate

    2.52 Good / Adequate

    2.53 Good / Adequate

    2.54 Good / Adequate2.55 Good / Adequate

    2.56 Good / Adequate

    2.57 Good / Adequate

    2.58 Good / Adequate

    2.59 Good / Adequate

    2.6 Good / Adequate

    2.61 Good / Adequate

    2.62 Good / Adequate

    2.63 Good / Adequate

    2.64 Good / Adequate2.65 Good / Adequate

    2.66 Good / Adequate

    2.67 Good / Adequate

    2.68 Good / Adequate

    2.69 Good / Adequate

    2.7 Good / Adequate

    2.71 Good / Adequate

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    14/29

    2.72 Good / Adequate

    2.73 Good / Adequate

    2.74 Good / Adequate

    2.75 Good / Adequate

    2.76 Good / Adequate

    2.77 Good / Adequate

    2.78 Good / Adequate

    2.79 Good / Adequate

    2.8 Good / Adequate

    2.81 Good / Adequate

    2.82 Good / Adequate

    2.83 Good / Adequate

    2.84 Good / Adequate

    2.85 Good / Adequate

    2.86 Good / Adequate

    2.87 Good / Adequate

    2.88 Good / Adequate

    2.89 Good / Adequate

    2.9 Good / Adequate

    2.91 Good / Adequate

    2.92 Good / Adequate

    2.93 Good / Adequate

    2.94 Good / Adequate

    2.95 Good / Adequate

    2.96 Good / Adequate

    2.97 Good / Adequate2.98 Good / Adequate

    2.99 Good / Adequate

    3 Good / Adequate

    3.01 Good / Adequate

    3.02 Good / Adequate

    3.03 Good / Adequate

    3.04 Good / Adequate

    3.05 Good / Adequate

    3.06 Good / Adequate

    3.07 Good / Adequate3.08 Good / Adequate

    3.09 Good / Adequate

    3.1 Good / Adequate

    3.11 Good / Adequate

    3.12 Good / Adequate

    3.13 Good / Adequate

    3.14 Good / Adequate

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    15/29

    3.15 Good / Adequate

    3.16 Good / Adequate

    3.17 Good / Adequate

    3.18 Good / Adequate

    3.19 Good / Adequate

    3.2 Good / Adequate

    3.21 Good / Adequate

    3.22 Good / Adequate

    3.23 Good / Adequate

    3.24 Good / Adequate

    3.25 Good / Adequate

    3.26 Good / Adequate

    3.27 Good / Adequate

    3.28 Good / Adequate

    3.29 Good / Adequate

    3.3 Good / Adequate

    3.31 Good / Adequate

    3.32 Good / Adequate

    3.33 Good / Adequate

    3.34 Good / Adequate

    3.35 Good / Adequate

    3.36 Good / Adequate

    3.37 Good / Adequate

    3.38 Good / Adequate

    3.39 Good / Adequate

    3.4 Good / Adequate3.41 Good / Adequate

    3.42 Good / Adequate

    3.43 Good / Adequate

    3.44 Good / Adequate

    3.45 Good / Adequate

    3.46 Good / Adequate

    3.47 Good / Adequate

    3.48 Good / Adequate

    3.49 Good / Adequate

    3.5 Very Good / Very Satisfactory3.51 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.52 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.53 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.54 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.55 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.56 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.57 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    16/29

    3.58 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.59 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.6 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.61 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.62 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.63 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.64 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.65 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.66 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.68 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.69 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.7 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.71 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.72 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.73 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.74 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.75 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.76 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.77 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.78 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.79 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.8 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.81 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.82 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.83 Very Good / Very Satisfactory3.84 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.85 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.86 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.87 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.88 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.89 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.9 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.91 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.92 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.93 Very Good / Very Satisfactory3.94 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.95 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.96 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.97 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.98 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    3.99 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    17/29

    4.01 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.02 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.03 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.04 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.05 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.06 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.07 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.08 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.09 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.1 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.11 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.12 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.13 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.14 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.15 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.16 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.17 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.18 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.19 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.2 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.21 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.22 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.23 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.24 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.25 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.26 Very Good / Very Satisfactory4.27 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.28 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.29 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.3 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.31 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.32 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.33 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.34 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.35 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.36 Very Good / Very Satisfactory4.37 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.38 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.39 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.4 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.41 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.42 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.43 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    18/29

    4.44 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.45 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.46 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.47 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.48 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.49 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

    4.5 Outstanding

    4.51 Outstanding

    4.52 Outstanding

    4.53 Outstanding

    4.54 Outstanding

    4.55 Outstanding

    4.56 Outstanding

    4.57 Outstanding

    4.58 Outstanding

    4.59 Outstanding

    4.6 Outstanding

    4.61 Outstanding

    4.62 Outstanding

    4.63 Outstanding

    4.64 Outstanding

    4.65 Outstanding

    4.66 Outstanding

    4.67 Outstanding

    4.68 Outstanding

    4.69 Outstanding4.7 Outstanding

    4.71 Outstanding

    4.72 Outstanding

    4.73 Outstanding

    4.74 Outstanding

    4.75 Outstanding

    4.76 Outstanding

    4.77 Outstanding

    4.78 Outstanding

    4.79 Outstanding4.8 Outstanding

    4.81 Outstanding

    4.82 Outstanding

    4.83 Outstanding

    4.84 Outstanding

    4.85 Outstanding

    4.86 Outstanding

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    19/29

    4.87 Outstanding

    4.88 Outstanding

    4.89 Outstanding

    4.9 Outstanding

    4.91 Outstanding

    4.92 Outstanding

    4.93 Outstanding

    4.94 Outstanding

    4.95 Outstanding

    4.96 Outstanding

    4.97 Outstanding

    4.98 Outstanding

    4.99 Outstanding

    5 Outstanding

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    20/29

    1 Poor

    1.01 Poor

    1.02 Poor

    1.03 Poor

    1.04 Poor

    1.05 Poor

    1.06 Poor

    1.07 Poor

    1.08 Poor

    1.09 Poor

    1.1 Poor

    1.11 Poor

    1.12 Poor

    1.13 Poor

    1.14 Poor

    1.15 Poor

    1.16 Poor

    1.17 Poor

    1.18 Poor

    1.19 Poor

    1.2 Poor

    1.21 Poor

    1.22 Poor

    1.23 Poor

    1.24 Poor

    1.25 Poor1.26 Poor

    1.27 Poor

    1.28 Poor

    1.29 Poor

    1.3 Poor

    1.31 Poor

    1.32 Poor

    1.33 Poor

    1.34 Poor

    1.35 Poor1.36 Poor

    1.37 Poor

    1.38 Poor

    1.39 Poor

    1.4 Poor

    1.41 Poor

    1.42 Poor

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    21/29

    1.43 Poor

    1.44 Poor

    1.45 Poor

    1.46 Poor

    1.47 Poor

    1.48 Poor

    1.49 Poor

    1.5 Poor

    1.51 Poor

    1.52 Poor

    1.53 Poor

    1.54 Poor

    1.55 Poor

    1.56 Poor

    1.57 Poor

    1.58 Poor

    1.59 Poor

    1.6 Poor

    1.61 Poor

    1.62 Poor

    1.63 Poor

    1.64 Poor

    1.65 Poor

    1.66 Poor

    1.67 Poor

    1.68 Poor1.69 Poor

    1.7 Poor

    1.71 Poor

    1.72 Poor

    1.73 Poor

    1.74 Poor

    1.75 Poor

    1.76 Poor

    1.77 Poor

    1.78 Poor1.79 Poor

    1.8 Poor

    1.81 Poor

    1.82 Poor

    1.83 Poor

    1.84 Poor

    1.85 Poor

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    22/29

    1.86 Poor

    1.87 Poor

    1.88 Poor

    1.89 Poor

    1.9 Poor

    1.91 Poor

    1.92 Poor

    1.93 Poor

    1.94 Poor

    1.95 Poor

    1.96 Poor

    1.97 Poor

    1.98 Poor

    1.99 Poor

    2 Average

    2.01 Average

    2.02 Average

    2.03 Average

    2.04 Average

    2.05 Average

    2.06 Average

    2.07 Average

    2.08 Average

    2.09 Average

    2.1 Average

    2.11 Average2.12 Average

    2.13 Average

    2.14 Average

    2.15 Average

    2.16 Average

    2.17 Average

    2.18 Average

    2.19 Average

    2.2 Average

    2.21 Average2.22 Average

    2.23 Average

    2.24 Average

    2.25 Average

    2.26 Average

    2.27 Average

    2.28 Average

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    23/29

    2.29 Average

    2.3 Average

    2.31 Average

    2.32 Average

    2.33 Average

    2.34 Average

    2.35 Average

    2.36 Average

    2.37 Average

    2.38 Average

    2.39 Average

    2.4 Average

    2.41 Average

    2.42 Average

    2.43 Average

    2.44 Average

    2.45 Average

    2.46 Average

    2.47 Average

    2.48 Average

    2.49 Average

    2.5 Average

    2.51 Average

    2.52 Average

    2.53 Average

    2.54 Average2.55 Average

    2.56 Average

    2.57 Average

    2.58 Average

    2.59 Average

    2.6 Average

    2.61 Average

    2.62 Average

    2.63 Average

    2.64 Average2.65 Average

    2.66 Average

    2.67 Average

    2.68 Average

    2.69 Average

    2.7 Average

    2.71 Average

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    24/29

    2.72 Average

    2.73 Average

    2.74 Average

    2.75 Average

    2.76 Average

    2.77 Average

    2.78 Average

    2.79 Average

    2.8 Average

    2.81 Average

    2.82 Average

    2.83 Average

    2.84 Average

    2.85 Average

    2.86 Average

    2.87 Average

    2.88 Average

    2.89 Average

    2.9 Average

    2.91 Average

    2.92 Average

    2.93 Average

    2.94 Average

    2.95 Average

    2.96 Average

    2.97 Average2.98 Average

    2.99 Average

    3 Good

    3.01 Good

    3.02 Good

    3.03 Good

    3.04 Good

    3.05 Good

    3.06 Good

    3.07 Good3.08 Good

    3.09 Good

    3.1 Good

    3.11 Good

    3.12 Good

    3.13 Good

    3.14 Good

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    25/29

    3.15 Good

    3.16 Good

    3.17 Good

    3.18 Good

    3.19 Good

    3.2 Good

    3.21 Good

    3.22 Good

    3.23 Good

    3.24 Good

    3.25 Good

    3.26 Good

    3.27 Good

    3.28 Good

    3.29 Good

    3.3 Good

    3.31 Good

    3.32 Good

    3.33 Good

    3.34 Good

    3.35 Good

    3.36 Good

    3.37 Good

    3.38 Good

    3.39 Good

    3.4 Good3.41 Good

    3.42 Good

    3.43 Good

    3.44 Good

    3.45 Good

    3.46 Good

    3.47 Good

    3.48 Good

    3.49 Good

    3.5 Good3.51 Good

    3.52 Good

    3.53 Good

    3.54 Good

    3.55 Good

    3.56 Good

    3.57 Good

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    26/29

    3.58 Good

    3.59 Good

    3.6 Good

    3.61 Good

    3.62 Good

    3.63 Good

    3.64 Good

    3.65 Good

    3.66 Good

    3.67 Good

    3.68 Good

    3.69 Good

    3.7 Good

    3.71 Good

    3.72 Good

    3.73 Good

    3.74 Good

    3.75 Good

    3.76 Good

    3.77 Good

    3.78 Good

    3.79 Good

    3.8 Good

    3.81 Good

    3.82 Good

    3.83 Good3.84 Good

    3.85 Good

    3.86 Good

    3.87 Good

    3.88 Good

    3.89 Good

    3.9 Good

    3.91 Good

    3.92 Good

    3.93 Good3.94 Good

    3.95 Good

    3.96 Good

    3.97 Good

    3.98 Good

    3.99 Good

    4 Very Good

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    27/29

    4.01 Very Good

    4.02 Very Good

    4.03 Very Good

    4.04 Very Good

    4.05 Very Good

    4.06 Very Good

    4.07 Very Good

    4.08 Very Good

    4.09 Very Good

    4.1 Very Good

    4.11 Very Good

    4.12 Very Good

    4.13 Very Good

    4.14 Very Good

    4.15 Very Good

    4.16 Very Good

    4.17 Very Good

    4.18 Very Good

    4.19 Very Good

    4.2 Very Good

    4.21 Very Good

    4.22 Very Good

    4.23 Very Good

    4.24 Very Good

    4.25 Very Good

    4.26 Very Good4.27 Very Good

    4.28 Very Good

    4.29 Very Good

    4.3 Very Good

    4.31 Very Good

    4.32 Very Good

    4.33 Very Good

    4.34 Very Good

    4.35 Very Good

    4.36 Very Good4.37 Very Good

    4.38 Very Good

    4.39 Very Good

    4.4 Very Good

    4.41 Very Good

    4.42 Very Good

    4.43 Very Good

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    28/29

    4.44 Very Good

    4.45 Very Good

    4.46 Very Good

    4.47 Very Good

    4.48 Very Good

    4.49 Very Good

    4.5 Very Good

    4.51 Very Good

    4.52 Very Good

    4.53 Very Good

    4.54 Very Good

    4.55 Very Good

    4.56 Very Good

    4.57 Very Good

    4.58 Very Good

    4.59 Very Good

    4.6 Very Good

    4.61 Very Good

    4.62 Very Good

    4.63 Very Good

    4.64 Very Good

    4.65 Very Good

    4.66 Very Good

    4.67 Very Good

    4.68 Very Good

    4.69 Very Good4.7 Very Good

    4.71 Very Good

    4.72 Very Good

    4.73 Very Good

    4.74 Very Good

    4.75 Very Good

    4.76 Very Good

    4.77 Very Good

    4.78 Very Good

    4.79 Very Good4.8 Very Good

    4.81 Very Good

    4.82 Very Good

    4.83 Very Good

    4.84 Very Good

    4.85 Very Good

    4.86 Very Good

  • 7/28/2019 Program Evaluation Analysis - Sample Computation

    29/29

    4.87 Very Good

    4.88 Very Good

    4.89 Very Good

    4.9 Very Good

    4.91 Very Good

    4.92 Very Good

    4.93 Very Good

    4.94 Very Good

    4.95 Very Good

    4.96 Very Good

    4.97 Very Good

    4.98 Very Good

    4.99 Very Good

    5 Outstanding