PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

16
PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBE EPE DML

Transcript of PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

Page 1: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014

DBE

EPE

DML

Page 2: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

ABOUT THE PE2013 PROJECT

A project of the SFL DBEDMLEPE

Carried out by R&D

(Zeynep Akşit, Defne Akıncı Midas / Hale Kızılcık)

- interested researchers invited (FLE)

Page 3: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

---a systematic collection and analysis of information necessary to

improve a curriculum, assess its effectiveness and efficiency, and determine participants’ attitudes within the context of a

particular institution.Brown, 1995

Page 4: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

PURPOSE OF EVALUATION

Summative judgmentLearning and formative improvement AccountabilityMonitoringDevelopmentKnowledge generation

Page 5: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

BENEFITS OF EVALUATION

AccountabilityInformation on specific strengths and weaknesses

of the curriculum and its implementationCritical information for strategic changes and

policy decisionsInput for improved learning and teachingIndicators of monitoring

Students (& their families) Instructors School Administration University Board Society International Accreditors

Page 6: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

OBJECTS OF EVALUATION

Needs Analysis

Objectives

Testing

Materials

Teaching

Evaluation

Brown, 1995

Page 7: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

IMPETUS

MACROSchool-wide attempt at re-defining program

outcomes (2011-2016 METU Strategic Plan)A need to coordinate the programs at the

DBE & DML

Page 8: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

IMPETUS

MICROThe last curriculum project – 2003The last evaluation process – 2005 –

problems indicated

Page 9: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS

The existing curriculum & syllabusThe materials in useThe teacher populationThe learnersThe resources of the program

Dubin & Olshtain, 1990

Page 10: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

WHAT DO WE WANT TO ACHIEVE?

To what extent the current program effectively addresses students’ needs?Curriculum / Syllabus documentsMaterialsTeachersTest batteriesEnvironmental factors

Page 11: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

INITIAL PHASE

Evaluation & Needs AssessmentAnalysis

Results & Decision Making

Page 12: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

SECOND PHASE

NeedsGoals &

Objectives

Content & Sequencing

StrategiesMaterials

Assessment

Review / Revise

Present Situation & Target Situation Analyses

Pilot Group

Page 13: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

WHERE ARE WE NOW?

Review of previous studies, literature, research reports,

Project outline / documentationFocus group interviewsSs Questionnaires

Page 14: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

Data collection cont’dDBE / DML StudentsDBE / DML InstructorsFaculty InterviewsFaculty Documents

Data AnalysisReporting

Page 15: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

Project framewor

kToolsData

Collection

Data Collectio

nData

AnalysisReport

(Tentative)

Program

Revision

2013 2014 Fall Spring Fall

Page 16: PROGRAM EVALUATION 2013 R&D, FEBRUARY 12, 2014 DBEEPEDML.

Graves, 2000