Review questions Jeffery D. Evans, Pharm.D. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice.
Professor of Pharmacotherapy (Clinical) University of Utah...
Transcript of Professor of Pharmacotherapy (Clinical) University of Utah...
David Young, Pharm.D. Professor of Pharmacotherapy (Clinical) University of Utah Asthma Center Pharmacist [email protected]
Differentiate between the various stages of COPD according to the current GOLD guidelines
Review the current therapeutic options to treat patients with COPD
Formulate a stepwise approach to the treatment of a patient with COPD
Discuss the importance of correct inhaler technique
1) http://www.lung.org/lung-disease/copd/resources/facts-figures/COPD-Fact-Sheet.html Accessed 9/15
12.7 million in US diagnosed in 2011 Estimated 24 million affected Morbidity & Mortality Third most common cause of death in US in 2010 ▪ 134,676 deaths ▪ 715,000 hospitalizations (2010)
Females deaths (70,000)> Males (64,000) in 2010 Cost of COPD in U.S. was ~$50 billion in 2010 1 DEATH EVERY 4 MINUTES
MMWR,2002;5(6):1-16
Percent Change in Age-Adjusted Death Rates, U.S., 1965-1998
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1965 - 1998 1965 - 1998 1965 - 1998 1965 - 1998 1965 - 1998 –59% –64% –35% +163% –7%
Coronary Heart
Disease
Stroke Other CVD COPD All Other Causes
$29.5 billion (direct) Hospital visits
$8 billion (morbidity) Loss of work
$12.4 billion (mortality) $49.9 BILLION TOTAL COSTS IN 2010
1) http://www.lung.org/lung-disease/copd/resources/facts-figures/COPD-Fact-Sheet.html Accessed 9/15
AIRFLOW LIMITATION
Luminal Plugs
Decrease in Elastic Recoil
Increased Airway Resistance
Airway Inflammation and Fibrosis
A common preventable and treatable disease, characterized by persistent airflow limitation that is usually progressive and
associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response in the airways and the lung to noxious particles or gases.”
GOLD 2015; ACCP
1. Chronic dyspnea ▪ Progressive ▪ Persistent ▪ Worse with exercise
2. Chronic cough ▪ May be intermittent at first ▪ May be unproductive
3. Chronic sputum production ▪ May vary from day to day
Severe COPD: • Fatigue • Weight loss • Cough syncope • Depression • Anxiety
GOLD 2015
COPD = Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70
GOLD 2015
Severity of Airflow Limitation Based on Post-Bronchodilator FEV1 (Only for patients with FEV1/FVC <0.70)
GOLD 1 Mild FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted
GOLD 2 Moderate 50% ≤ FEV1 < 80% predicted
GOLD 3 Severe 30% ≤ FEV1 < 50% predicted
GOLD 4 Very Severe FEV1 < 30% predicted
GOLD 2015
C D
A B
Ris
k G
OLD
cla
ssifi
catio
n 1
2 3
4
0 1
>2
R
isk
Exac
erba
tion
hist
ory
mMRC 0-1 mMRC >2 CAT <10 CAT >10
Symptoms
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale
mMRC Grade Description
0 I only get breathless with strenuous exercise.
1 I get short of breath when hurrying on the level or walking up a slight hill.
2 I walk slower than people of the same age on the level because of breathlessness, or I have to stop for breath when walking on my own pace on the level.
3 I stop for breath after walking about 100 meters or after a few minutes on the level.
4 I am too breathless to leave the house or I am breathless when dressing or undressing.
GOLD 2015
COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
C D
A B
Ris
k G
OLD
cla
ssifi
catio
n 1
2 3
4
0 1
>2
R
isk
Exac
erba
tion
hist
ory
GOLD 2015
mMRC 0-1 mMRC >2 CAT <10 CAT >10
Symptoms
SMOKING Occupation Indoor & outdoor pollution Genetic Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency
Infection Socioeconomic status
Reduce progression of airflow obstruction
Relieve symptoms Improve exercise tolerance Improve health status Prevent and treat exacerbation’s Reduce mortality
GOLD 2015
Patient Group Essential Recommended Local Guidelines
A Smoking cessation
Physical activity
Flu & Pneumococcal Vaccine
B-D Smoking cessation, Pulmonary rehab
Physical activity
Flu & Pneumococcal Vaccine
GOLD 2015
>18yrs currently smoking (2013)
17.8% of all adults (42.1 million people) ▪ 20.5% of males, 15.3% of females
<18yrs (2013)
>3200 smoke 1st cigarette
~2100 occasional smokers become daily smokers
>250,000 middle school and high school students never smoked regular cigarettes but had used e-cigarettes three times as many as 2011
2011
Nearly 7 in 10 (68.9%) adult cigarette smokers wanted to stop smoking.
More than 4 in 10 (42.7%) adult cigarette smokers had made a quit attempt in the past year.
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm#use
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm
> 18yrs who currently smoke cigarettes was 11.8% in 2011 (1st in US)
>18yr who currently use smokeless tobacco was 3.0% in 2011 (14th in US)
Grades 9–12 who currently smoke cigarettes was 5.9% in 2011 (1st in US)
Grades 9-12 who currently use smokeless tobacco was 3.7% in 2011 (2nd is US)
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/state_data/state_highlights/2012/states/utah/index.htm
Graph by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. which was adapted from Fletcher CM, Peto R: The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. Brit Med J 1977; 1:1645-1648.
Nicotine gum(Nicorette 2,4mg) Nicotine patch(Nicoderm 7,14,21mg) Nicotine inhaler (Nicotrol inhaler 10mg) Nicotine nasal spray (Nicotrol NS 0.5mg) Nicotine lozenge (Committ 2mg, 4mg) Bupropion SR (Zyban 150mg) Varenicline (Chantix 0.5mg,1mg)
Patient group
First choice Second choice Alternative
A SAMA prn or SABA prn LAMA or LABA or SABA + SAMA
Theophylline
B LAMA or LABA LAMA + LABA SABA +/-SAMA
C ICS+LABA or LAMA LAMA + LABA PDE-4 inhibitor; SABA +/-SAMA; Theophylline
D ICS+LABA and/or LAMA ICS+LAMA; ICS+LABA+LAMA; LAMA + LABA; LAMA + PDE-4 inhibitor
Carbocysteine; SABA +/-SAMA; Theophylline
GOLD 2014
Ipratropium (Atrovent HFA®, Ipratropium 0.02% neb soln)
Dosage MDI 2 puffs qid Neb soln 500mcg tid-qid
Adverse effects Dry mouth
Tiotropium bromide (Spiriva Handihaler® or Respimat ®) M-3 receptor blocker
1 puff (18mcg) daily (Handihaler® ) or 2 puff (5mcg) daily
Adverse effects Dry mouth, URI, pharyngitis, sinusitis
Additive AE’s with SAMA or LAMA
Singh S, et al. BMJ 2011 Meta-analysis of randomized-controlled
trials ▪ 5 RCT included ▪ RR 1.52 (95% CI, 1.06-2.16) of mortality
Wise RA, et al. NEJM 2013 RDBPC Tiotropium Respimat® (2.5, 5mcg) vs
Handihaler® (18mcg) n=17,135 mean follow-up 2.3 years Risk of Death HR 0.96 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.09) Non-superior with respect to risk of 1st exacerbation
0.98 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.14)
Tashkin DP, et al. Respiratory Research 2015 Post-hoc analysis Tiotropium Handihaler® (18mcg) vs
placebo of UPLIFT trial ▪ n=5993 over 4 years ▪ Patients excluded if recent MI (<6 months), any unstable or life
threatening cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or hospitalization for CIII or CIV heart failure w/in 1yr
Post-hoc analysis selected pts who experienced cardiac event during treatment that did not withdraw from trial after 1st event.
N=400 (203 tiotropium vs 197 placebo) Not at increased risk of all-cause mortality or cardiac adverse
events (arrhythmia, MI, CHF)
Aclidinium (Tudorza pressair®) M-3 receptor blocker
1 puff (400mcg) twice daily Adverse effects Headache, pharyngitis, sinusitis
Additive AE’s with SAMA or LAMA
Umeclidinium (Incruse Ellipta®) M-3 receptor blocker
1 puff (62.5mcg) daily Adverse effects Pharyngitis,URTI,Cough
Additive AE’s with SAMA or LAMA
Glycopyrrolate (Seebri Neohaler®) M3 receptor blocker
1 puff (15.6mcg) twice daily Adverse effects Nasopharyngitis,URTI
Products Albuterol
▪ MDI (Albuterol HFA, Proventil HFA, Ventolin HFA, ProAir HFA, Proair Respiclick)
▪ Nebulized (Accuneb, Proventil) ▪ Oral tablets & syrup (Proventil, Proventil Repetab, VoSpire ER)
Levalbuterol ▪ MDI (Xopenex HFA) ▪ Nebulized (Xopenex)
Epinephrine (Asthmanefrine) ▪ Approved >4yrs ▪ 0.5ml (11.25mg epinephrine) via EZ Breathe Atomizer 1-3
inhalations every 3 hours prn (maximum 12 inhalations/24hr ) ▪ Seek medical help if no relief in 20 minutes
Aformoterol (Brovana®) 15mcg neb BID Formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer®) 12mcg puff BID;
(Perforomist®) 20mcg neb BID Indacaterol (Arcapta neohaler®) 75mcg dpi once
daily Olodaterol (Striverdi Respimat®) 2 puffs (5mcg)
daily Salmeterol (Serevent Diskus®) 1 puff (50mcg) BID
LABA + ICS
Medication Device Dose Frequency
Advair Diskus® (fluticasone/salmeterol) DPI 250/50, 500/50 mcg 1 INH BID
Symbicort® (budesonide/formoterol) MDI 160/4.5 mcg 2 INH BID
Breo Ellipta® (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol) DPI 100/25 mcg 1 INH daily
GOLD 2015; Lexi-Drugs
Double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, multi-center study
N=6184 2 week run-in 3 year treatment period (all taken twice daily) Placebo 50mcg SALM 500mcg FP (high dose) 500mcg FP (high dose)+ SALM 50mcg
Results (FP/SALM vs placebo) Risk of death (HR=0.825, 95% CI=0.681 to 1.002; p=0.052) Rate of moderate/severe exacerbation (HR=0.75 95%
CI=0.69 to 0.81 p<0.001) ▪ NNT=4
Rate of severe exacerbation requiring hospital (HR=0.83 95% CI=0.71 to 0.98 p<0.03)
Requirement systemic steroid (HR=0.57 95% CI=0.51 to 0.64 p<0.001)
FEV1 difference 0.092 (p<0.001) SGRQ change in score -3.1 (-4.1 to -2.1 p<0.001)
Results (FP/SALM vs SALM) Risk of death (HR=0.932, 95% CI=0.765 to 1.134; p=0.48) Rate of moderate/severe exacerbation (HR=0.88 95%
CI=0.81 to 0.95 p<0.002) Rate of severe exacerbation requiring hospital (HR=1.02
95% CI=0.87 to 1.20 p=0.79) Requirement systemic steroid (HR=0.71 95% CI=0.63 to
0.79 p<0.001) FEV1 difference 0.050 (p<0.001) SGRQ change in score -2.2 (-3.1 to -1.2 p<0.001)
FEV1 Dyspnea QOL Exacerbation Rate
Calverley 2007 FP/SALM vs SALM
n/a Improved
Calverley 2003 FP/SALM vs SALM
Improved Improved
Mahler 2002 FP/SALM vs SALM
~ Improved ~ n/a
Hanania 2003 FP/SALM vs SALM
~ ~ n/a
Szafranski 2003 BUD/FORM vs FORM
~ ~ ~
Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25mcg once daily
Adverse effects Nasopharyngitis, URTI, Headache, Oral
candidiasis Drug interactions CYP 3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole) increase
fluticason effects Hepatic impairment (moderate-severe ) No dose adjustment but 3X exposure to FF
SABA + SAMA
LABA + LAMA
Medication Device Dose Frequency
Combivent Respimat® (albuterol/ipratropium) MDI 100 mcg/20 mcg 1 INH QID
DuoNeb® (albuterol/ipratropium) NEB (2.5 mg/0.5 mg)/ 3 mL 1 NEB QID
Medication Device Dose Frequency
Anoro Ellipta® (umeclidinium/vilanterol) DPI 62.5/25 mcg 1 INH daily
Stiolto Respimat® (tiotropium/olodaterol) MDI 2.5/2.5mcg 2 INH daily
Utibron Neohaler® (Indacaterol/ Glycopyrrolate)
DPI 27.5/15.5mcg 1 INH bid
GOLD 2015; Lexi-Drugs
Umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25mcg once daily
Adverse effects Pharyngitis, sinusitis, LRTI, diarrhea, constipation,
extremity pain, muscle spasm, neck & chest pain Additive AE’s with SAMA or LAMA
Tiotropium/olodaterol 2.5/2.5mcg once daily Adverse effects Pharyngitis, back pain, cough
Additive AE’s with SAMA or LAMA
Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate 27.5/15.5mcg twice daily
Adverse effects Nasopharyngitis, hypertension
Roflumilast (Daliresp®) GOLD 3 & 4 500mg tab once daily Adverse effects ▪ GI (diarrhea, wt loss, nausea) ▪ Headache, dizziness, insomnia
Drug interactions ▪ CYP 3A4 inhibitors (cimetidine) increase effects ▪ CYP 3A4 inducers (rifampin) decrease effects
GOLD 2015
Inhaled steroids may be useful in GOLD 3 & Stage 4 exacerbations symptoms, lung function, & QOL risk of pneumonia
Combination therapy with LABA is more effective than individual agents
GOLD 2015; Calverley PM, et al. NEJM 2007; Crim C, et al. Eu Respir J 2009
Leuppi JD, et al. JAMA 2013 Treatment ▪ 40mg po daily X 5 days vs 14 days Primary Endpoint ▪ Time to next exacerbation in 6
months Results ▪ HR 0.95 (90% CI, 0.70 to 1.29)
GOLD 2015
Aclindinium/formoterol Mometasone/formoterol Vilanterol Ipratropium/Fenoterol
“There are well designed studies that demonstrate that the medicine has to be in you
to be effective”
Dr. Wayne Samuelson, MD Professor of Medicine
University of Utah University of Utah Adult Asthma Center Director
50% of adults and children do not perform all steps correctly (Crompton GK. Lung 1990;Suppl 168:658-662)
Reasons for noncompliance Not taking off cap Not shaking Failure to coordinate actuation with inspiration Inhale through nose and not mouth Inhale too fast Failure to breath-hold after dose “Cold freon” effect Holding MDI upside down
Plaza et al. Resp 1998;65:195-198 9% of patients, 15% of nurses, and 28% of
physicians showed correct MDI-technique. Interiano et al. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:81-
85 65% of patients, 39% of housestaff, 82% of
nurses were categorized as having “poor” MDI-technique.