Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern [email protected]
description
Transcript of Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern [email protected]
![Page 1: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Swiss Political SystemAn IntroductionFirst Part
Presentation at the Federal Institute of TechnologyLausanne, Oct. 21, 2010
Prof. em. Wolf LinderInstitute of Political ScienceUniversity of [email protected]
![Page 2: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
> Part I (Oct. 21)> Origins of the Swiss Federation 1815-1848> Federalism> The Parliament and the Executive> Part II (Nov. 4)> Direct Democracy> Power Sharing> A comparative perspective
Contents
![Page 3: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
> Origins of the Swiss Federation
1815-1848
3
![Page 4: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
History: The fight for democracy and federalism 1815-1848: not so peaceful
>1815: No common state. Reestablishment of authoritarian governments in the Cantons>After 1830: Democratic move- ments in protestant cantons>Riots in parts of Switzerland>1844: Aargau prohibits Catholic monasteries / Lucerne calls ultra- conservative Jesuit monks.>1845: Irregular troops from Aargau attack Lucerne twice
Assembly demanding more democracy in Uster 1830
![Page 5: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Unrest after 1830
Army troops putting down insurgent movements of the rural population in Basel 1831 (left) and Zurich 1839 (right)In Basel, the people were fighting against a conservative, in Zurich against a liberal government
![Page 6: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
1845 Alliance of 7 Catholic Cantons „Sonderbund“ as reaction to liberal movement
![Page 7: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
The „Sonderbund“ War
>20 July 1847: The „Tagsatzung“ decides that the Catholic Alliance must be dissolved. The Catholic Cantons reject the decision.>4 November 1847: The Liberal majority decides to go to war. General Dufour declares that the enemy should be treated with humanity>After 20 days, the Catholics are defeated at Gislikon near Lucerne>100 death and 500 wounded.
![Page 8: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
The Federal Constitution of 1848
> A political compromise between the protagonists of a central state and the opposition who did not want a central state at all. Only few competencies for the Federal Government
> Bi-cameral parliament and collective leadership in the Executive
> Federalism: A bottom-up approach to governance> Semi-direct Democracy: Referendum for constitutional
amendments> Main reasons for the creation of the Federation:
— National independence— Economy
![Page 9: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Swiss Federalism:
A State conceived bottom-up
9
![Page 10: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Citizenship and the three levels of the federal system
LEVEL CITIZENSHIP
1 nation (3) federal 26 cantons (2) cantonal2600 communes (1) communal
![Page 11: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
The Cantons
>Have power to organise themselves (constitutions)>Have parliaments, governments and courts>Implement their own but also most of federal laws>Are financially strong (40% of tax revenue / spending)
![Page 12: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
The Communes
>Have limited power to organize themselves>Have government and parliament or citizens assembly (depending on size) >Possess (judicially protected) autonomy regarding their own laws >Are financially strong (30% of tax revenue / spending)
![Page 13: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Powers and politics in Swiss federalism
> Bottom-up state: all powers belong to the communes and the cantons, unless
> A (new) competency is conferred to the federation by constitutional amendment (vote of the people and the cantons)
> The cantons participate in the decision-making of the central state (bi-cameral parliament, double majority of cantons and the people in constitutional amendment)
> Consequences:— Strong position of the Cantons, central government “weak”— A strongly decentralised state, living up to the principle of
“subsidiarity”
13
![Page 14: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Who is doing what? A portfolio of shared responsibilities
Federation Cantons Communes
Schools (x) X XHealth (x) X XPolice (x) X XMoney XArmy XRoads X X XForeign Policy XSocial security X (x) (x)Welfare X XTaxation X X X
![Page 15: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Strong federalism: Why?
> History 1848: The federal state as a compromise between cantons “pro” and “against” a central state
> Multi-cultural society: Strong divides between— Catholics and Protestants— Industrialised and rural cantons— Four linguistic regions (German, French, Italian, Romansh)
> Federalism gives utmost autonomy to the cantons, protecting minorities and the diversity of their cultures
> Modern meanings:— Efficiency (small bureaucracy, low taxes)— The cantons as laboratory of policy innovation (try and error)— A State close to the people: Why federalism makes the Swiss happy— Some “buts”….
15
![Page 16: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The authorities of the Federation:Parliament and the Executive
16
![Page 17: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Parliament I: The National CouncilThe representation of the People
>200 members (part-time)>Seats distributed among cantons according to population>Elections (every 4 years) since 1918: based on principle of proportionality>Speaker: Rotates every year among main parties
![Page 18: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Parliament II: The Council of StateThe representation of the Cantons
>46 members (part-time)>Two representatives per canton>Elected every 4 years according to system determined by canton>Equal weight and competencies as National Council
![Page 19: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
The Executive: The Federal Council
>7 members (Ministers)>Elected by Federal Assembly for 4 years>Rotating Presidency (each year)>Speaks with one voice (principle of collegiality)>Each member is head
of one ministry
![Page 20: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Switzerland’s “All Party Government”:Composition of the Federal Council
Political Parties(1959 – 2010)
Radicals (Liberals) 2Social Democrats 2Christian Democrats 1 (2 until 2003)Swiss People‘s Party 2 (1 until 2003)
Languages German speaking 4 – 5French/Italian speaking 2 – 3
Religion Catholics at least 2Protestant not more than 5
Gender 2010 majority of 4 women
![Page 21: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Reasons for, and the functioning of the governmental „Grand Coalition“
> From a one-party government to proportional representation: a historical process of co-optation and integration
> Direct democracy: Referenda allow opposition groups to veto governmental politics. This forces the political parties to co-operate in a grand coalition.
> The „formula“ of the grand coalition: proportional representation (party, language, gender)
> Mode of functioning: negotiation and compromise> No „big change“ between government and opposition parties, but
different issue-wise coalitions amongst the members of government (and parliamentary factions)
> Effect: political stability, slow innovation, high integration> Crisis of the Grand Coalition and the politics of compromise?
21
![Page 22: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Next time
> Direct democracy> Power sharing> Comparative perspectives> And for those who want to learn more:
Wolf Linder, Swiss DemocracyPalgrave MacmillanHoundmills, BasingstrokeISBN 9 780230 231893
22
![Page 23: Prof. em. Wolf Linder Institute of Political Science University of Bern wolf.linder@ipw.unibe.ch](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062814/56816790550346895ddcbf19/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Thank you