Prof. Charpentier

30
The future of medical innovation in transplantation Prof B. CHARPENTIER Head of the Department of Nephrology University Hospital of Bicêtre Director of the INSERM Unit U542 ESOT Past President

Transcript of Prof. Charpentier

Page 1: Prof. Charpentier

The future of medical innovation in transplantation

Prof B. CHARPENTIERHead of the Department of Nephrology

University Hospital of BicêtreDirector of the INSERM Unit U542

ESOT Past President

Page 2: Prof. Charpentier

Defining transplantation:

Replacing a failing organ and ensuring a major vital function

Page 3: Prof. Charpentier

One example:transplantation of kidney

• The most commonly transplanted organ is the kidney

• Kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease– Improves improves patient survival– improves quality of life

• Treatment, not a cure• Transplant recipients receive life-long

maintenance immunosuppressive therapy• Transplant immunosuppressive therapy carries

significant morbidities

Page 4: Prof. Charpentier

Unmet medical need in transplantation, as exemplified by

kidney transplantation• Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine; tacrolimus)

are the cornerstone of life-long maintenance immunosuppression

• Dramatic improvements in prevention of acute rejection have, however, not been matched by gains in patient and graft survival– Need for re-transplantation for certain patients, due to

chronic allograft nephropathy• Cardiovascular death and chronic allograft

nephropathy (C.A.N.) are the leading causes of death and graft loss

• Cornerstone and adjunctive immunosuppressive agents contribute to cardiovascular and metabolic morbidities and are directly nephrotoxic

Page 5: Prof. Charpentier

I. Speaking optimally: prevention is the first goal

Preventing the preventable:kidney, heart and liver diseases

Page 6: Prof. Charpentier

Gains

• For the State: financial savings • For the patient: well-being• For physicians: time

Page 7: Prof. Charpentier

I.I Prevention of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD):

• Obesity non-HDL cholesterol• High blood pressure• Chronic infections• Smoking• Genetic diseases• Nephrolithiasis• Diabetes

Page 8: Prof. Charpentier

I.2 Prevention of Chronic Liver Disease (CLD)

• Viral infection• Alcohol

Page 9: Prof. Charpentier

I.3 Prevention of Ischaemic Heart Disease (IHD)

• Smoking• Non-HDL cholesterol• Exercise

Page 10: Prof. Charpentier

II. If not preventable, then treat

Possible future alternatives to transplantation given the

context of organ shortage

Page 11: Prof. Charpentier

II.1. regenerative medicine

• Stem cells and others: myocytes transplant for the failing heart comes of age

Stem Cell Therapy The Promise of Embryonic Stem Cells

Page 12: Prof. Charpentier

II.2. Organ embryogenesis in vitro/in vivo

• Example: tracheal transplant

Possibility to increase organ replacement

Stem Cells In Vitro Organogenesis

Page 13: Prof. Charpentier

II.3. artificial organs

• HD• CAPD• Artificial heart• Artificial liver

Page 14: Prof. Charpentier

III. Transplantation as part of a treatment

Trends in transplantation

Page 15: Prof. Charpentier

Trends in organ transplantation

• Increasingly more patients• Increasingly older recipients (new

paradigm of recipient’s death with a functioning graft)

• Increasingly older donors (new question of extended criteria donors)

• Discrepancy between the donor slope and the recipient slope leading to transplant tourism

Page 16: Prof. Charpentier

III.1 Living related donors

• Different laws in different European countries• European coordination• National vs. regional vs. European networks• Campaigns for organ donation: interesting the

media to promote a culture of organ donation (different successes in different countries)

• “old” living related donors (LRD)• “pool exchange” donors for sensitised recipients

Page 17: Prof. Charpentier

III.2 deceased donors

• Non heart beating donors– Controversy in Italy with the notion of brain death

• Aged donors• Perfusion machines• Expanding the donor pool • Action on family refusal

– Despite some political and societal initiatives in France, family refusal has risen from 5-10% in 1976 to roughly 40% in 2007

• Coordination– As exemplified by the Spanish experience

• Donation campaigns

Page 18: Prof. Charpentier
Page 19: Prof. Charpentier
Page 20: Prof. Charpentier

III.3 Xenotransplantation

• At present, still many years away …– Humoral rejection (antibodies)– Acute rejection (immune cells)– Chronic rejection (antibodies + immune

cells)– Interspecies viral infections

Page 21: Prof. Charpentier

III.4 in vivo/in vitro organ embryogenesis

• For example: tracheal transplantation coated with autologous epithelial cells (Barcelona, Spain)

Page 22: Prof. Charpentier

IV. If transplantation is only part of a treatment …

… then what happens after transplantation?

Page 23: Prof. Charpentier

IV.1 managing the side effects of immunosuppressive therapies (1)• Cardiovascular events are the first cause

of death with a functioning graft…– Vascular toxicity of steroids and Calcineurin

inhibitors – Older patients– Vascular comorbidity– Smoking– Obesity– Lack of exercise

Page 24: Prof. Charpentier

IV.1 managing the side effects of immunosuppressive therapies (2)• Oncogenesis is also a significant problem:

– Post transplant lymphoma disorder (PTLD): role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV, commonly called mononucleosis) under immunosuppression

– Skin cancers: role of papillomavirus + UV– Other cancers

Page 25: Prof. Charpentier

IV.1 managing the side effects of immunosuppressive therapies (3)• Fungal infections:

– Need new therapeutic agents • Bacterial infections:

– Need new antibiotics• Viral infections:

– Vaccination?– New therapeutic agents on

• Cytomegalovirus• big DNA Epstein-Barr virus• Herpes viruses BK virus (of polyomavirus family)

Page 26: Prof. Charpentier

IV.2 towards better immunosuppressive agents …

• Development of new biologic agents– E.g., LEA

• Development of new chemical molecules– E.g., FTY, MNA

which=> are less toxic=> are less carcinogenic=> prevent chronic allograft nephropathy (C.A.N.)=> have an improved metabolic profile (blood pressure, lipids,

diabetes, …)

But=> high cost of development (phase I -> phase IV)

Page 27: Prof. Charpentier

IV.3 … or no need for immunosuppression at all …

• Inducing a real state of organ ‘transplantation tolerance’, without immunosuppressants

• … the goal of every physician and surgeon involved in transplantation

• … achieved by manipulating the immune system

Page 28: Prof. Charpentier

V. Ensuring the progress we need

Calling for action

Page 29: Prof. Charpentier

V.1 Education for transplantation: professionals and citizens

• Professionals– At national level– At European level

• For example, the ESOT pyramid of education– Accreditation

• Transplant teams• Doctors: UEMS-EBS

• Society– Education and campaigns on prevention and

on donation as early as in primary school

Page 30: Prof. Charpentier

V.2 Research / funding

• Bench: basic research• Bedside: clinical investigation• Different from one country to another• European network:

– Example: RISET (reprogramming the immune system for the establishment of tolerance), a multinational European project financed by the EU Commission (DG RTD)

• No global action plan• Compared with US