Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

download Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

of 29

Transcript of Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    1/29

    PRODUCTIVITYGROWTH IN EUROPE

    AND THE US

    Presentation on the basis of article:

    Charles Wyplosz

    Productivity growthin Europe and the US.

    Saugirda KoktaitJolanta Kardokait

    Malwina Orowska

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    2/29

    A comparison of the standard of living in

    Europe and the US shows that Europe has

    not caught up and is becoming more and

    more behind.

    Looking at the performance, 1960-90

    Europe has caught up more than the US,

    but since the mid-1990s, lost ground.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    3/29

    DefinitionsProductivity: the amonunt of goods and services

    produced from each hour of workers time

    Labor productivity: the quantity of output per timespent or numbers employed; could be measured in, forexample, U.S. dollars per hour

    Standard of living: refers to the quality andquantity of goods and services available to people, and theway these goods and services are distributed within apopulation

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    4/29

    This presentation shows that the

    European productivity slowdown

    compared to the United States.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    5/29

    Figure 1 illustrates the changes in GDP percapita in the EU15 and the US since 1960.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    6/29

    The gap has never really been narrowed,

    it has in fact increased. The first increase

    came in 1991 as a result of Germanunification. More worrisome is the gradual

    widening since the mid-1990s.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    7/29

    Slower labor productivity growth in Europe than in the

    United States since 1995 reverses a long-term pattern

    of convergence.

    But yet, the traditional postwar convergence process

    came to an end by the mid-1970s.

    Then, in the period from 1973 to 1995, productivity

    growth in both Europe and the United States began to

    slow.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    8/29

    Labor productivity in the US accelerated from

    1.3 percent in the 1973-1995 to2.2 percent in the 1995-2000.

    1.3

    2.2

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    9/29

    Labor productivity in the EU declined from anannual rate of2.4 percent during the period19731995 to 1.5 percent during the period19952000.

    2.4

    1.5

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    10/29

    Labour productivity

    Europe has restored prosperity by

    gradually raising its production

    capacities.

    The mission was successfully

    accomplished by the mid-1990s.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    11/29

    Similarly the employment ratio has sharply

    risen in Europe while it has remained stable in

    the US. Thus the deterionation of European

    living standarts relatively to those in the US.

    It is entirely due to the poor productivity

    performance in Europe while US productivity

    has accelerated as the right-hand side in

    figure 2 clearly shows.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    12/29

    Figure 2 presents the changes in labor

    productivity in the EU and the US.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    13/29

    The catch-uphypothesis doesnot explain thereversal inproductivitytrends in Europeand US.

    The reason forthis new, positivedevelopment arenot yet fullyelucidaded.

    Figure 3 indicates that the decline of hours

    per employee has slowed in Europe, just itfell in the US after a long period of stability.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    14/29

    Dew-Becker and Gordon, the most recent and

    authoritative analysis of the question, argues that

    the most plausible explanation is that labor

    market conditions have improve in Europe.

    Indeed, since the mid-1990s,

    many countries have reducedlabor taxes and reformed theirlabor markets.

    This could explain why the totalnumber of hours worked hasincreased.

    Dew-Becker

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    15/29

    According to Dew-Becker and Gordon, this

    more extensive of the workforce has mostly

    concerned previously not-working people,

    many of whom are low- skilled. On average,

    the overall workforce has become lessskilled.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    16/29

    Rising labor taxes and increasingly morerestrictive labor market arrangements

    during this period have forced firms to hire

    skilled workers.

    This upgrading of the workforce has raised

    labor productivity in Europe but it is.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    17/29

    Picture shows the sources

    of productivity growth

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    18/29

    Three sources of

    productivity growthThere are two fundamental sources of

    growth:technology advances

    capital accumulation

    Technology is a very important thing in ourlife and do not matter what you do you haveto use technology.

    Capital accumulation its mean moreproductive equipment some of which is alsoproductive thanks to technological progress.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    19/29

    While the two fundamental sources of growth

    played a major and well documented role inEuropes fast labor productivity increase, there isa third source of growth.

    Rising labor costs force firms to rice labor costs.The labor force is the sum of those employed andthose unemployed people.

    Firms accumulate capital faster, in effectreplacing costly workers with relatively cheapermachines, and they replace unskilled with skilledworkers whose are individually more productive.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    20/29

    The table shows productivity and real wages

    in 1981-2008

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    21/29

    A more microeconomic story?

    Explosive growth of investment in ICT (information

    and communication technology) was at the centre

    of the unrealistic expectations and excessiveenthusiasm that surrounded the new economy

    during the late 1990s.

    The slowdown in GDP growth and investment in

    ICT in the US since 2000 has tempered the hype.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    22/29

    With the recent boom in ICT investment,

    labor productivity growth in the U.S. more

    than doubled:from 1.1% in 1990-1995

    to 2.5% in 1995-2000

    In contrast labor productivity growth in most

    European countries slowed during the second

    half of the 1990s.from 1.9% in 1990-1995

    to 1.4% in 1995-2000

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    23/29

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    24/29

    Optimism?

    Europes famous underutilisation of its

    labor resources - and therefore its high

    unemployment rate - is now being cured.

    Currently, we see a slowdown in

    productivity gains because more

    low-skilled workers find jobs.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    25/29

    As firm adapt to this change and invest in

    equipment that makes better use of these

    workers.

    It takes several years for capital to

    accumulate but the process is most likely

    under way.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    26/29

    In addition, a more intensive use of

    previously idle labor means that the same

    productivity gains translate into a faster rise

    in living standards.

    When it happens, Europe will be catching

    up again.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    27/29

    What role for the ECB?

    Edmund Strother Phelps, Jr. (born

    July 26, 1933) is an American

    economist and the winner of the 2006Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic

    Sciences. The key finding is that the

    long-run rate of unemployment is notaffected by inflation but only

    determined by the functioning of the

    labor market.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    28/29

    Forty years intensive research confirmed this

    discovery

    Stabilization policy can only dampen short-termfluctuations in unemployment.

    Phelps showed how the possibilities ofstabilization policy in the future depend ontoday's policy decisions.

    Nowadays all central banks are required todeliver low inflation and to eschew any attemptat dealing with unemployment in particular, andgrowth or productivity more generally.

  • 8/14/2019 Productivity Growth in Europe and the Us

    29/29

    The implication is clear:

    Europes productivity performance is

    unrelated to past and present

    monetary policies and the ECB

    should not be asked to deal with this

    problem.