PRODUCTION OF NANOPARTICLES BY VAPOUR PHASE ...
Transcript of PRODUCTION OF NANOPARTICLES BY VAPOUR PHASE ...
1
PRODUCTION OF NANOPARTICLES BY VAPOUR PHASE
SYNTHESIS USING TRANSFERRED ARC REACTOR A.C. da Cruz1 , T. Addona2, and R.J. Munz2
1 Institute for Technological Research of the State of São Paulo – IPT, Mechanics and Electricity Division, Brazil, [email protected]; 2 CRTP, Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Canada
ABSTRACT: A short review of recent work on the development of a transferred arc reactor concept applied to the vapour phase synthesis of nanoparticles is presented. Examples are given of experimental and modelling work carried out on the preparation of nanoscale silicon oxide (fumed silica) and aluminium nitride, and fine aluminium powders.
INTRODUCTION
The preparation of nanoparticles has been the object of growing interest due to the
distinct properties they present when compared with materials in the bulk state1,2,3. Because of
the large surface-area-to-volume ratio, a great portion of the composing atoms reside by the
surface of one such particle. As a result, the physical properties of materials in this form
correspond to neither those of the free atoms or molecules making up the particle nor to those of
bulk materials having the same composition. For example, nanoparticles find application in the
preparation of high performance catalysts and sintering of materials at lower temperatures, both
of which profit from the larger specific surface areas of nanoparticles. Nanostructured materials
are usually prepared by compaction of a powder of nanoparticles4. They are characterised by a
large number of grain boundary interfaces in which the local atomic arrangements are different
from those of the crystal lattice. The range of applications of nanoparticles also includes the
preparation of nanocomposites. These consist of nanoparaticles dispersed in a continuous matrix,
creating a compositional heterogeneity of the final structure. In this way, materials can be
prepared which exhibit interesting properties such as higher critical superconductor transition
temperature and alloying of normally immiscible materials4.
The many methods employed in the preparation of metal and ceramics nanoparticles
include gas-phase processes, laser ablation, sputtering techniques, and chemical methods. In the
work of Kruis et al.4 a comparison is made between two of these methods: gas-phase and liquid
based process. A number of advantages of the first are pointed out. These include higher purity
products, the potential to create complex chemical structures, better process and product control,
economics, and less chemical segregation. Moreover, because the gas-phase method usually
leads to continuous processing, it is better suited to larger scale production.
2
The evaporation-condensation technique is one of the gas-phase methods used to produce
nanoparticles. In order to achieve reasonable evaporation rates, this method requires high
temperatures which implies the use of intense energy sources. In particular, the evaporation-
condensation of materials using thermal plasmas has been intensively studied5. For many years, a
variety of different thermal plasma systems have been used to synthesise ultra-fine particles
(Figure 1), including transferred and non-transferred arcs, high frequency induction plasmas, and
combinations of these. Each of these systems has its own distinct advantages and limitations.
Particles produced are characterised by their small size (of the order of few to the hundred of
nanometers) and may include pure metals, alloys, both oxide and covalent ceramics, and even
composite materials.
This paper is focused in the application of the transferred-arc in such syntheses. The main
advantage of transferred-arc reactors is the very high temperature driving force for evaporation.
Temperatures of more than 10000 K can easily be sustained either by striking the arc directly to
the anode work piece, or by feeding raw material in the form of powders directly into the arc.
Because transferred–arcs can be operated over a broad range of gases and gas flow rates,
including very low flow rates, operating costs can be kept low. Also, control over the
concentration of the evaporated species in the exhaust gas (and consequently over particle size)
can be provided simply by adjusting the desired flow rate at a given evaporation rate. An
additional advantage of transferred-arc systems is that the plasma evaporator may be scaled up
over a broad range of powers simply by increasing the arc current (100 – 2000 A). In the
following sections, the recent experimental and modelling work performed both at the CRTP
laboratories of McGill University/Canada6 and at IPT/Brazil in the transferred arc concept are
reported. These include the preparation of fine metal particles as well as nanoscale oxide and
covalent ceramic powders.
REACTOR CONCEPT
Early workers who used transferred-arc systems (particularly investigating the synthesis
of ultra-fine particles in reacting systems) attempted to carry out both metal evaporation and
reaction inside the plasma chamber using a reactive plasma gas7,8,9. Because of steep temperature
and concentration gradients around the arc, control of particle formation in such an environment
is difficult to control and, moreover, large lumps may form. To minimise these problems, the
reactor concept used at CRTP for the production of nanoparticles (schematically shown in Figure
2, after Moura10) has the following features: (i) separation of evaporation and reaction (or
3
quench); and (ii) particle formation in axial flow cylindrical reactor with radial injection of
second reactant and/or quench.
THERMAL PLASMA SYSTEMS
Protectiogas
Plasma
Plasma
c) RADIO FREQUENCY INDUCTION
Work
Plasmaarc
Plasma gas
b) TRANSFERRED ARC
Plasmaarc
Plasma gas
a) NON-TRANSFERRED ARC
( - )
( + )( - )
( + )
Figure 1 – Schematic representation of the three different plasma systems commonly used in ultra-fine
particles synthesis investigations.
This approach has the main advantage of allowing separate optimisation of the two
reactor sections, thus giving better control over conversion and particle size distribution. Because
the only energy loss occurs, in principle, at the cathode (and this can be limited to the order of
five percent), the system is also highly energy efficient. Although this transferred-arc reactor
concept has many advantages over other reactor systems, practical limitations exist mainly
concerning construction materials. The intense arc radiation may lead to melting or other
deterioration of the side wall of the reactor. To allow for high evaporation rates and the high
energy efficiency just mentioned, the anode must be well insulated (mainly to avoid conductive
losses) and thus operate at very high temperatures. This poses not only thermodynamic limits
(reaction of the molten anode with crucible material), but physical limits as well (melting and
dissolution of crucible material in the molten anode).
In an attempt to overcome the above mentioned problems, a new reactor design is being
tested at IPT. In comparison with the previous CRTP/McGill work, the present version
introduces modifications which are aimed at avoiding not only undesirable reaction between
metal and crucible material, but also to promoting larger product powder yields. A schematic
drawing of the experimental apparatus is presented in Figure 3. Unlike the previous version, the
molten anode has been replaced by a circular water cooled anode that is assembled in the mid
4
portion of the reactor. The concept of separation of evaporation and reaction (or quench) is still
maintained, in that that metal precursor in the form of a powder is continuously fed into the arc.
����
����������������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������
��������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������������������
������������������������������������
���������������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Cathode
Plasmachamber
Arc
Quenching
FilterAnode
Tubular reactor
Figure 2 – CRTP reactor concept, after Moura8.
REACTOR
FilterHeat exchamger
Vaccumpump
ExhaustionModule 1(arc chamber)
Module 2(hot gaschamber)
Module 3(mixing chamber)
Exhaustionchamber
Anodeassembly
Cathodeassembly
Figure 3 – Schematic diagram of the plasma reactor for the vapour phase synthesis
of ultrafine powders developed at IPT.
5
In the following, some examples are given of research results using these two reactor
versions in reactive, both oxide (fumed silica) and covalent (aluminium nitride), and non-
reactive systems (production of aluminium ultrafine particles).
NANOPHASE SILICA
Nanophase silica, also known as fumed silica, is a speciality chemical widely used as
filler in silicon rubber and toothpaste as a thixotropic agent, thickening and gelling agent, as
flattening agent in varnish, and also in the preparation of optical fibers preforms11. Fumed silica
is currently produced using aerosol flame reactors. Nanoparticles, includeding fumed silica,
titanium dioxide, and carbon black, are produced at a rate of 100 metric tons per day using this
method12.
The flame synthesis of fumed silica uses silicon tetrachloride fed into an
oxygen/hydrogen flame. Although well developed, this process is expensive and
environmentally problematic since it produces HCl. The proposed plasma process using the
CRTP reactor concept shown in Figure 4 uses quartz raw material which is thermally
decomposed at the anode to form SiO(g) and oxygen. In the tubular reactor outside the plasma
chamber, a steam quench reforms the silica in the desired particle size and amorphous form13.
Fumed Silica Reactor
Figure 4 – Transferred-arc silica evaporator from Addona14.
6
The experimental study included the investigation of the effect of both plasma gas flow
rate and arc current on the rate of silica decomposition at the anode11. It was verified that the
decomposition rate was practically independent of gas flow rate but increased with arc current as
expected (higher energy input and temperatures at the anode). Use of hydrogen was also
investigated14. Hydrogen acts not only as a reducing gas but also provides much better heat
transfer properties. The introduction of 3% hydrogen mixed with argon resulted in an increase in
the decomposition rate of 7.5 times showing that both the production rate and efficiency of the
process can be greatly increased with the use of hydrogen. The quality of the product was found
to be almost identical to commercially available material (Aerosil® 200) in terms of surface area,
appearance, hydroxylation, etc., but lacked the thixotropic properties of that material. This was
attributed to the lack in the plasma process of the agglomerator which is included in the flow
sheet of the commercial process.
Modelling work was carried out in this system aimed at examining the flow within the
transferred arc evaporator and predicting the evaporation rates of silicon monoxide as a function
of arc current and plasma gas flow rate. The model allows computation of the temperature,
velocity and current density fields in both gas and condensed phases. Figure 5(a) shows the
temperature distribution in the gas and anode (argon flow rate of 15 lpm and arc current of 200
A). The highest temperature (about 20000 K) is reached near the cathode tip. At the arc root, the
gas temperature is of the order of 12000 K. A more detailed temperature distribution of the
condensed phase (anode) is shown in Figure 5(b). This figure shows that vaporisation (~ 3000 K)
is limited to a diameter of about 10 mm below the arc root.
Figure 5 Ð Temperature distribution (a) in the gas and molten silica and (b) molten silica detailed; after Addona14.
7
ALUMINUM NITRIDE
Plasma synthesis of aluminium nitride (AlN) has been studied by a number of workers15.
AlN has potential application as a substrate support for electronic circuits where its high thermal
conductivity and high electrical resistivity are important properties. The early work of Moura8
used the side discharge reactor shown in Figure 2, similar to that of Addona11,12, with injection of
ammonia in the form of radial cross flow into a hot stream of argon carrying aluminium vapour.
Da Cruz developed a co-axial reactor (Figure 6), which allowed both radial and axial injection of
the ammonia, using both pure argon and argon containing 10% hydrogen.
b) Axial injection or reagent (at A or B).
������
������
Ar
NH3/Ar(B)
arcAr/(H2)
T1T2
gassampling (Al)
low vacuumpump
water in/out
water out
water in
Al bath(anode)
metal filter
cathode
T3
T4
������
������
NH3/Ar
T5
T6
a) Radial injection of reagent.
NH3/Ar(A)
gassampling (NH )3
T7
Figure 6 - Transferred-arc plasma reactor used for AlN
ultrafine powder synthesis from Da Cruz17.
In the radial injection experiments using the apparatus shown in Figure 6, conversion to
AlN was incomplete, possibly due to condensation of the aluminium before ammonia injection.
The experiments using axial injection, on the other hand, were successful in producing a 100%
converted AlN powder. Control of particle size, evaluated in terms of powder surface area, was
possible over a broad interval (38-282 m2/g). Overall, particle size control depended on several
operating parameters, including quenching gas flow rate, gas temperature (1800K and 2000K),
gas composition (pure Ar, Ar/H2), and quenching gas injection geometry (axial or radial).
8
Examples of particles produced under different operating conditions are given in the
micrographs shown in Figure 7. The dependence of particle size on the various operating
parameters mentioned are more systematically shown in the graphs of Figure 8. It is observed the
higher temperature invariably lead to larger particle sizes. This is seen to result from the greater
concentrations of metal vapour (more intense evaporation) which are achieved at higher
temperatures. Depending on the plasma gas composition, two apparently contradictory trends
were observed for the particle size change as a function of quenching intensity in case of the
radial injection [Figure 8(a)]. For a plasma gas formed by Ar/10%H2, as expected the surface
area per unit mass increases (particle size decreases) as the quench intensity is increased. In the
case of a pure Ar plasma gas, unexpectedly the particle size increased as quench intensity
increased. In the case of axial injection of NH3, it was found that particle sizes were greater when
the injection was further upstream [Figure 8(b), z = -215 mm] because residence time was longer
and particles had more time to grow.
In the case of the most recent reactor version presented in Figure 3, two types of
experiments have been carried so far: (i) Al evaporation/condensation; (ii) AlN synthesis. As in
the case of the axial injection experiments previously presented, the AlN synthesis experiments
also resulted in fully converted aluminium nitride powders, with specific surface area of about 60
m2/g (approximately 30 nm average particle diameter). The x-ray diffraction pattern of these
powders, with are typical of the powders also produced in the previous version is shown in
Figure 9. Based on overall mass balances for the many experiments carried out, a production rate
in the 72 to 163 g/h range is estimated. A summary of main results obtained with the pure Al
production experiments is presented in the next section.
It was previously mentioned the practical limitations observed with respect to
construction materials in the case of the reactor version in which the arc is transferred to a
molten bath. The same problem was not observed with the use of a circular water cooled anode
with the metal precursor fed directly into the arc. On the other hand, using this configuration in
the AlN synthesis resulted in energy losses to the anode ranging from 20 to 50%, depending on
the specific operating conditions.
Considering the reaction between NH3 and Al(v), a 2-D model based on the moments of
particle size distribution was developed also for this system. This development includes a new
nucleation model that accounts for the effect of surface reaction on the surface of cluster of the
new condensed phase16. A cluster of x atoms of Al and y “molecules” of AlN was considered and
allowed to interact with the gas phase according to the elementary reactions shown in Figure 10.
The model allowed the prediction of the intensity of nucleation rate, gas phase reaction rate,
9
condensation rate (Al and AlN), as well as surface reaction rate. A summary of the relative
magnitude of these different gas-to-condensed phase mechanisms is shown in Figure 11. Is may
be seen that while the amount of nucleation (in kg/m3s) is small, it is very important in
determining the final conversion and size distribution of the product powder. The gas phase
reaction rate and subsequent aluminium nitride condensation rate are both quite small. The larger
terms are the aluminium condensation rate and surface reaction rate, which are roughly equal in
magnitude. By integrating over any chosen reactor cross-section, the model can be used to
predict product composition and particle size distribution, and thus used for reactor design and
optimisation.
METAL FINE PARTICLES
A systematic study of the production and characterisation of metal nanoparticles ranging
from about 3 to 100 nm using an evaporation/condensation ultrafine particles generator was
presented by Granqvist and Buhrman1. This early work demonstrated the ability to producing
quantities of particles of controlled size, on the interest of fundamental studies of the physics of
minute metal particles. Nowadays, nanostructured metal particles are used in a variety of
applications such as catalysis, superalloys, and thin film coatings in the chemical and electronics
industries.
Production of fine metal particles can be carried out in any of the reactor versions
previously presented by quenching the metal vapour laden plasma chamber off gases using inert
gas. Figure 12 shows spherical sub-micrometer aluminium particles which were produced in the
reactor version shown in Figure 3; the starting powder particles exhibiting irregular shape and
much larger particle sizes are shown as well. Particle sizes of starting and prepared powders
compared, it is observed that the average size is reduced by approximately 80 times. The particle
size analysis of starting (Höganäs MG 300) and produced powder in one of the early experiments
(Exp. 4) is shown in Figure 13. The two peaks observed in case of the fines particles produced in
the reactor indicate that approximately 15% by mass of the air-atomised aluminium powder used
as raw material did not completely evaporate under the conditions of this particular experiment.
Further increase of arc power to powder feed rate ratio resulted in complete evaporation.
Although not shown, for the same quenching conditions applied in the study of
production of AlN [Figure 8(a)], little effect was observed of quenching intensities on the
average particle size of powders produced17. Producing powders with finer particles requires
either the use of more intensive quenching, lower system pressure, or lower metal
concentrations18.
10
a)
b)
c)
d)
Figura 7 – TEM micrographs of AlN powders produced under various operating conditions: a) Exp. 17/6.1, radial injection, Ar, 1800 K, 282 m2/g, dBET= 7 nm; b) Exp. 15/1.1, radial injection, Ar/H2, 1800K, 111.6 m2/g, dBET=16 nm; c) Exp. 10, radial injection, Ar/H2 , 2000 K, 93.5 m2/g, dBET= 20 nm; and d) Exp. 21.3, axial injection, Ar, 2000 K, 46.5 m2/g, dBET=40 nm.
Temperature (K)
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
Spec
ific
surfa
ce a
rea
(m2 /g
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
z = - 175 mm
z = - 215 mm
Quenching intensity (Ar flow rate, lpm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Spec
ific
surfa
ce a
rea
(m2 /g
)
0
50
100
150
200
250 Ar
Ar / H2
- 1800 K- 2000 K
z = 0 mm
AlN - Effect of Operating Conditions on Particle Size
a) Radial injection, Ar and Ar/H2 b) Axial injection, Ar
Figure 8 – Surface area of powders produced under radial and axial quenching gas injection, showing also the influence of quenching intensity, gas composition, temperature, and residence time. The parameter z represents the distance of the NH3 injection (z = 0 mm refers to the axial distance of radial injection; z = - 175 and - 215 mm are the axial injection positioned up stream the radial injector).
50 nm 100 nm
50 nm 100 nm
11
Figure 9 – Typical x-ray diffraction pattern of fully converted powders produced.
Figure 11 – Predictions of mass rates corresponding to the various phase transition mechanisms for AlN; after Da Cruz17.
CONCLUSIONS
An overview of recent experimental and modelling work carried out in the development
and application of transferred arc reactors to the synthesis of fine particles was presented. A
summary of preparation of oxide and nitride nanoparticles, as well as metal fine particles was
given. Raw materials feeding into the system has been accomplished using either a molten anode
and or direct feeding of powder metal into the arc (with water cooled, non-consumable anode).
With respect to previous work using transferred arcs, the separation of evaporation and reaction
(or quenching) into two distinct sections has proven effective in providing a better control over
12
conversion and particle size distribution. At the same time, this approach allows separate
optimisation of the two reactor sections. The use of a water cooled anode resulted in a better
performance with respect to the problem of crucible material deterioration observed in the
molten anode version. On the other hand, this design resulted in relatively high energy losses to
the anode ranging from 20 to 50%, depending on the specific operating conditions. Based on
overall mass balances for the many experiments carried out, a production rate in the 72 to 163
g/h range is estimated in case of the water cooled anode version. Modelling work has been used
for better understanding the process and reactor optimisation as well.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 12 – Preparation of fine metal (b) and ceramic powders (c) from air-atomised metal powder [(a), Höganäs MG 300], using non-reacting and reacting atmosphere, respectively.
Non-reacting
Reacting
200 nm
100 nm
13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0
Particle diameter (µm)
% a
ccum
ulat
ed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
% in
crem
enta
l
MG 300Exp. #4
Figure 13 – Particle size distribution of commercial aluminium powder (Höganäs MG 300) and powder
produced in the evaporation/condensation process (Exp. 4). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Government of Quebec through FCAR, Baskatong Quartz Inc. (Canada), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil) are gratefully acknowledged. The PhD work of A.C. da Cruz was supported by a scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa Científica (CNPq), Brazil.
14
REFERENCES 1 Granqvist, C.G. and Buhrman, R.A., Ultrafine metal particles, J. App. Physics, Vol. 47(5), pp. 2200-2219, 1976. 2 Rao, C.N.R., Chemical Approaches of the Synthesis of Inorganic Materials, John Wiley & Sons, 1994. 3 Wegner, K. and Pratsinis, S.E., Aerosol flame reactors for the synthesis of nanoparticles, KONA Powder and Particles No. 18, pp. 170 – 182, 2000. 4 Kruis, F.E., Fissan, H., and Peled, A., Synthesis of nanoparticles in the gas phase for electronic, optical and magnetic applications – a review, J. Aerosol Sci., Vol. 29(5/6), pp. 511-535, 1998. 5 Fauchais et al., High Pressure Plasmas and Their Application to Ceramic Technology, Springer-Verlag, 1983. 6 Munz, R.J., Addona, T., and Da Cruz, A.C., Application of transferred arcs to the production of nanoparticles, Pure and Appl. Chem., Vol. 71(10), pp. 1889-1897, 1999. 7 Etemadi, K., Formation of aluminum nitrides in thermal plasmas, Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 41-56, 1991. 8 Godin, M. F., Chevallier, F., Amouroux, J., and Morvan, D., Synthesis of aluminum nitride powders by thermal plasma, International Symposium on Plasma Chemistry 10, Brochum, p. 1.4-4 p.1, 1991. 9 Ageorges, H., Megy, S., Chang, K., Baronnet, J. M., Williams, J. K., and Chapman, C., Synthesis of aluminum nitride in transferred arc plasma furnaces, Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 613-632, 1993. 10 Moura, F.J., Vapour phase synthesis of AlN using a transferred arc plasma system, PhD thesis, McGill University, 1993. 11 Kammler, H.K. and Pratsinis, S.E., Scaling-up the production of nanosized SiO2-particles in a double diffusion flame aerosol reactor, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 1, pp. 467-477, 1999. 12 Wegner, K. and Pratsinis, S.E., Aerosol flame reactor for the synthesis of nanoparticles, KONA Powder and Particle No. 18, pp. 170-182, 2000. 13 Addona, T. and Munz, R.J., Silica decomposition using a transferred arc process, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 38, pp. 2299-2309, 1999. 14 Addona, T., Study of a novel thermal plasma process for the production of fumed silica. PhD thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 1998. 15 Da Cruz, A.C. and Munz, R.J., Review of the vapour-phase synthesis of aluminum nitride powder using thermal plasmas, KONA Powder and Particle No. 17, pp. 85-94, 1999. 16 Da Cruz, A.C. and Munz, R.J., Nucleation with simultaneous chemical reaction in the vapour phase synthesis of AlN ultrafine particles, Aerosol Science and Technology, Vol. 34(6), pp. 499-511, 2001. 17 Da Cruz, A.C., Experimental and modelling study of the plasma vapour-synthesis of ultrafine aluminum nitride powders, PhD thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 1997. 18 Panda, S. and Pratsinis, S.E., Modeling of the synthesis of aluminum particles by evaporation-condensation in an aerosol flow reactor, NanoStructured Materials, Vol. 5(7/8), pp. 755-767, 1995.