Producon )of)ammonia and)urea)from)industrial,non3...

25
Albert Van Rillaer, Energy Recovery Systems Produc’on of ammonia and urea from industrial, non recyclable waste: fantasy or opportunity

Transcript of Producon )of)ammonia and)urea)from)industrial,non3...

Albert  Van  Rillaer,  Energy  Recovery  Systems  

Produc'on  of  ammonia  and  urea  from  industrial,  non-­‐recyclable  waste:  fantasy  or  opportunity  

ERS

Energy  Recovery  Systems  Company,  Ltd  (°2012,  Saudi  Arabia)  Founded  and  managed  by  Al  Issa  family,  Saudi  Arabia  Management:  William  Edgar  Smith,  Technical  Director  (USA)  

         Albert  Van  Rillaer,  CEO  (B)    ERS’  management  has  solid,  experienced  leadership  in    •  North-­‐America:  first  use  of  waste  hydrocarbons  as  cement  kiln  fuel,  

exported  interna'onally  •  Numerous  waste  sources  as  addi'ves  and  feedstock  in  cement  

manufacturing  •  Crea'on  new  waste  management  equipment  and  technology    

Waste to Chemicals in Antwerp

Energy  Recovery  Systems  Company  plans  to  build  a  Waste  to  Chemicals  (WtC)  

plant  in  the  Antwerp  port,  changing  on  a  yearly  basis  3.485.000  tons  of  

industrial,  non-­‐recyclable  waste  into  645.500  tons  of  green  ammonia  and  

1.231.500  tons  of  green  urea.  Ammonia  is  used  as  base  chemical  in  the  Antwerp  

chemical  cluster  and  urea  is  a  sustainable  fer'lizer.  ERS  and  the  port  authori'es  

are  currently  nego'a'ng  the  concession  of  150  ha  at  the  Delwaidedock.    

Waste to Chemicals

waste  

Thermoselect©  

gasifica'on  

ammonia  

urea  

WtC plant in Antwerp

•  An  investment  of  3.7  billion  Euro  •  Feedstock  arrival  9.500  ton  waste/day  •  Daily  capacity  of  4.500  ton  Ammonia  and  3.850  ton  Urea    •  Trade  Balance  effect:  500  million  euro/year  •  Mari'me  Cargo:  up  to  5  million  ton/year  •   import:  1400  ships/year      -­‐-­‐      export:  35  ships/year  

•  Employment  900  FTE    +  contractors  during  construc'on  phase  

     

Technology

Waste  to  Chemicals  installa'on  uses  Thermoselect©  technology:  •  Developed  in  coopera'on  with  Sinerga  SA  (CH)  •  Oxygen  fed,  high  temperature,  closed  gasifica'on  system  •  Full  Recovery:  •  100%  of  waste  vola'les  as  gas  •  Waste  inert  material  as  reusable  byproduct  (metals,  minerals)  

Material balance

Production process

Why Antwerp?

•  Integra'on  with  exis'ng  chemical  cluster  •  ERS  ammonia  produc'on  capacity  designed  to  cover  the  Antwerp  

chemical  cluster  net  short  •  Large  volumes  of  excellent  quality  waste  available  and  delivery  by  ship  •  Gas  and  liquid  pipeline  distribu'on  infrastructure  •  Sea,  road  and  rail  distribu'on  •  Well  trained  workforce  •  Presence  of  contractors  and  local  support  •  Development  of  synergies  with  local  industrial  partners  &  stakeholders  

Technical process & impact by VITO

Ive  Vanderreydt,  VITO  

Produc'on  of  ammonia  and  urea  from  industrial,  non-­‐recyclable  waste:  fantasy  or  opportunity  

VITO  in  a  nutshell  

750  Highly-­‐qualified   researchers

26  Na9onali9es

+500  Research partners

1000  Research  projects

200  scien9fic   ar9cles

400  patents worldwide

HQ  in   Mol,  Belgium

7  loca9ons  in  Belgium

Data  31/12/2013

ERS  Concept  

Waste  

Air  

 

GasificaFon  

Air  SeparaFon  

Ammonia  Synthesis  

Compression  

Conversion  CO  +  H2O  à  CO2  +  H2  

Reformed  syngas  SeparaFon  

Water  

Oxygen  

Nitrogen

 NH 3

 Hydrogen  H2  

SYNTHETIC  FERTILIZER  Urea  CO(NH2)2  

CO2  

SYNTHESIS  GAS  CO        CO2      H2  

+  

=  

THERMOSELECT  

7/09/15   14  ©  2014,  VITO  NV  

Technical  feasibility  

Does  the  project  have  a  sound  technical  design?

Is  it  an  innova9ve  concept?

What  will  be  the  overall  impact  on  the  environment? Environmental  impact  

evaluaFon  How  does  this  impact  compare  to

•  tradi9onal  waste  management •  tradi9onal  produc9on

1  

2  

Prof. A. Buekens

Prof. K. Vrancken + team

Approach  

Assessment  of  environmental  impacts  METHODOLOGY  

taking  into  account  the  total  life  cycle  

all  relevant  inputs  and  outputs  of  the  system,  including  all  upstream  and  downstream  impacts  

Assessment  of  environmental  impacts  METHODOLOGY  

energy  

resources  

emissions  

byproducts  

water  

energy  

Environmental  impacts  

ERS  concept  

Assessment  of  environmental  impacts  METHODOLOGY  

Inputs  and  outputs  

Assessment  of  environmental  impacts  ERS  System  

FuncFonal  unit:    produc'on  of  650  kton  of  ammonia  and  1,240  kton  of  urea  from  3,500  kton  of  industrial  post-­‐recycling  waste  

Waste  collec'on  Transport  industrial  

waste  to  ERS  ERS  treatment    

of  industrial  waste  

UREA  AMMONIA  

Assessment  of  environmental  impacts  Benchmark  from  ammonia  and  urea  produc'on  perspec've  

FuncFonal  unit:    produc'on  of  650  kton  of  ammonia  and  1,2400  ton  of  urea  

Waste  collec'on  Transport  IW  

to  ERS  ERS  treatment    

of  IW  

AMMONIA   UREA  

System  boundaries  of  system  “urea  and  ammonia  from  waste”    

Primary  producFon  AMMONIA  

Primary  ProducFon  UREA   System  boundaries  of  system  

“virgin  urea  and  ammonia”    

ANALYZED    PROCESS  

AVOIDED    PROCESS  

Assessment  of  environmental  impacts  Benchmark  from  waste  management  perspec've  

FuncFonal  unit:    treatment  of  3,500  ton  of  industrial  post-­‐recycling  waste  

Waste  collec'on  Transport    to  incinerator  

IncineraFon  (IW)  

ELECTRICITY  

System  boundaries  of  system  “waste  treatment  at  MSWI  with  energy  recovery”    

Belgian  Electricity  ProducFon  System  boundaries  of  system  

“Belgian  electricity  produc>on”    

FuncFonal  unit:    treatment  of  3,500  ton  of  industrial  post-­‐recycling  waste  

ERS  concept  

Result  Ammonia  and  urea  produc'on  perspec've  

ERS  concept  Fossil  based  producFon  

Result  Ammonia  and  urea  produc'on  perspec've  

100  

200  

300  

100  

200  

300  

Environm

ental  

Bene

fit  

Net  result  

Result  Waste  management  perspec've  

100  

200  

300  Urea  and  ammonia  

producFon  

Environm

ental  

Bene

fit  

IncineraFon  

Conclusions  

Innovative concept, based on

proven technologies

Better overall environmental performance compared to

traditional techniques

Recommenda'ons  

Focus  on  high  calorific  input  

Effects  on  input  and  output  markets  

Use  exis'ng  experience  for  opera'on  

Op'malisa'on  poten'al