Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 + Observations

29
Image credit: Gerhard Bac hmayer Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 + Observations Nick Indriolo, Brian D. Fields, & Benjamin J. McCall University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

description

Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 + Observations. Nick Indriolo, Brian D. Fields, & Benjamin J. McCall University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Collaborators. Takeshi Oka – University of Chicago Tom Geballe – Gemini Observatory Tomonori Usuda – Subaru Telescope - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 + Observations

Page 1: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Image credit: Gerhard Bachmayer

Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation

with H3+ Observations

Nick Indriolo, Brian D. Fields, & Benjamin J. McCall

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Page 2: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Collaborators• Takeshi Oka – University of Chicago• Tom Geballe – Gemini Observatory• Tomonori Usuda – Subaru Telescope• Miwa Goto – Max Planck Institute for Astronomy• Geoff Blake – California Institute of Technology• Ken Hinkle – NOAO

Page 3: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Cosmic Ray Basics

• Energetic charged particles and nuclei• Thought to be primarily accelerated in

supernova remnants• Diffuse throughout the interstellar

medium along magnetic field lines• Generally assumed that the cosmic-

ray spectrum is uniform in the Galaxy

Page 4: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Example Cosmic-Ray Spectra

1 - Nath, B. B., & Biermann, P. L. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 447 2 - Hayakawa, S., Nishimura, S., & Takayanagi, T. 1961, PASJ, 13, 184 3 - Valle, G., Ferrini, F., Galli, D., & Shore, S. N. 2002, ApJ, 566, 252

4 - Kneller, J. P., Phillips, J. R., & Walker, T. P. 2003, ApJ, 589, 217 5 - Spitzer, L., Jr., & Tomasko, M. G. 1968, ApJ, 152, 971 6 – Indriolo, N., Fields, B. D., & McCall, B. J. 2009, ApJ, 694, 257

Page 5: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Interactions with the ISM

• Ionization and excitation of atoms and molecules – CR + H CR’ + p + e-

– CR + H2 CR’ + H2+ + e-

• Spallation of ambient nuclei and of heavier cosmic rays– CR + [C,N,O] CR’ + [Li,Be,B] +

fragments

Page 6: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Interactions with the ISM

• Excitation of nuclear states, resulting in gamma-ray emission – CR + 12C CR’ + 12C* 12C + 4.44

– CR + 16O CR’ + 16O* 16O + 6.13

• Production of mesons (+, -, 0) during inelastic collisions– CR + H CR’ + H + 0

+

Page 7: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Cross Sections

Bethe, H. 1933, Hdb. d Phys. (Berlin: J. Springer), 24,

Pt. 1, 491 Read, S. M., & Viola, V. E. 1984, Atomic Data Nucl. Data, 31, 359 Meneguzzi, M. & Reeves, H. 1975, A&A, 40, 91

dEEEhigh

low

E

E)()(4

Page 8: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Pionic Gamma-Rays & Supernova Remnants

Page 9: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Pionic Gamma-Rays & Supernova Remnants

VERITAS gamma-ray map of IC 443:Acciari et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, L133

Page 10: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Pionic Gamma-Rays & Supernova Remnants

HESS gamma-ray map of W 28Aharonian et al. 2008, A&A, 481, 401

Fermi-LAT gamma-ray map of W 28Abdo et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 348

Page 11: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Pionic Gamma-Rays & Supernova Remnants

Supernova remnants accelerate hadronic cosmic raysEkin > 280

MeV

Abdo et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 348

Page 12: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Tracing Lower-Energy Cosmic Rays

• Formation of molecular ion H3+ begins

with ionization of H2

– CR + H2 H2+ + e- + CR’

– H2+ + H2 H3

+ + H

• Cross section for ionization increases as cosmic-ray energy decreases, so H3

+ should trace MeV particles

Page 13: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

H3+ Chemistry

• Formation– CR + H2 H2

+ + e- + CR’

– H2+ + H2 H3

+ + H

• Destruction– H3

+ + CO HCO+ + H2 (dense clouds)

– H3+ + e- H2 + H or H + H + H (diffuse

clouds)

• Steady state in diffuse clouds)H()H( 322 nnkn ee

Page 14: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Calculating the Ionization Rate)H()H( 322

nnkn ee

)H(

)H(

2

3H2 n

nnxk ee

)H(

)H(

2

3H2 N

Nnxk ee

xe from C+; Cardelli et al. 1996, ApJ, 467, 334

nH from C2;Sonnentrucker et al. 2007, ApJS, 168, 58

Sheffer et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1075

N(H2) from N(CH)

Page 15: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Observations

• Transitions of the 2 0 band of H3+ are

available in the infrared– R(1,1)u: 3.66808 m; R(1,0) : 3.66852 m– R(1,1)l : 3.71548 m; Q(1,1) : 3.92863 m– Q(1,0) : 3.95300 m; R(3,3)l : 3.53367 m

• Weak absorption lines (typically 1-2%) require combination of a large telescope and high resolution spectrograph

Page 16: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Instruments/Telescopes

Phoenix: Gemini South

CRIRES: VLT UT1

CGS4: UKIRT

NIRSPEC: Keck II

IRCS: Subaru

Page 17: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Select H3+ Spectra

Crabtree et al. 2010, ApJ, submitted

Page 18: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Current Survey Status

• Searched for H3+ in about 50 diffuse

cloud sight lines• Detected absorption in 20 of those• Column densities range from a few times

1013 cm-2 to a few times 1014 cm-2

• Inferred ionization rates of 2–810-16 s-1, with 3 upper limits as low as 710-17 s-1

Dame et al. 2001, ApJ, 547, 792

Page 19: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Implications

• Variations in the ionization rate suggest that the cosmic-ray spectrum may not be uniform at lower energies

• If true, the cosmic-ray flux should be much higher in close proximity to the site of particle acceleration

• Search for H3+ near the supernova

remnant IC 443

Page 20: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Target Sight Lines

HD 254577

HD 254755

HD 43582

HD 43907

HD 43703

ALS 8828

Page 21: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Indriolo et al. 2010, ApJ, in press

Results

Page 22: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

HD 254577

HD 254755

HD 43582

HD 43907

HD 43703

ALS 8828

Page 23: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

ResultsN(H3

+) ζ2

(1014 cm-2) (10-16 s-1)

ALS 8828 4.4 16±10

HD 254577 2.2 26±16

HD 254755 < 0.6 < 3.5

HD 43582 < 0.8 < 9.0

HD 43703 < 0.6 < 5.7

HD 43907 < 2.1 < 40

H

223

)H()H(

nxk

NN

ee

Either ζ2 is

large, or xenH is small

Page 24: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Case 1: Low electron density

• By taking an average value from C+, have we overestimated the electron density?

• xe decreases from ~10-4 in diffuse clouds to ~10-8 in dense clouds

• C2 rotation-excitation and CN restricted chemical analyses indicate densities of 200-400 cm-3 (Hirschauer et al. 2009)

• Estimated values of x(CO) are ~10-6, much lower than 3×10-4 solar system abundance of carbon

Page 25: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Case 2: High Ionization Rate

• How can we explain the large difference between detections and upper limits?

• Cosmic-ray spectrum changes as particles propagate

• Perhaps ALS 8828 & HD 254577 sight lines probe clouds closer to SNR

Spitzer & Tomasko 1968, ApJ, 152, 971Torres et al. 2008, MNRAS, 387, L59

Page 26: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Propagation & Acceleration

• MHD effects– May exclude lower-energy particles from

entering denser regions– Damping of Alfvén waves may limit time

spent in denser regions• Acceleration effects

– In models of diffusive shock acceleration, the highest energy particles escape upstream while the others are advected downstream (into the remnant)

Page 27: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Applications

• With sufficient spatial coverage (i.e. sight lines), it may be possible to track particle flux in supernova remnants

• This may be useful in constraining particle acceleration/escape efficiency in models

• Allow for better constraints on the interstellar cosmic-ray spectrum

Page 28: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Summary

• H3+ has been detected in 20 of ~50

diffuse cloud sight lines studied, and ionization rates range from 0.7–810-16 s-1

• Ionization rates inferred near IC 443 are ~210-15 s-1, suggesting that the supernova remnant accelerates a large flux of low-energy cosmic rays

• Propagation effects and proximity to the acceleration site may cause non-uniformity in the cosmic-ray spectrum

Page 29: Probing Cosmic-Ray Acceleration and Propagation with H 3 +  Observations

Future Work

• Continue survey of H3+ in diffuse cloud

sight lines

• Search for H3+ near more supernova

remnants interacting with the ISM• Where possible, perform necessary

ancillary observations (H2, CH, CO, C, C+) to constrain sight line properties