Probabilistic forecast skill of extreme weather in …...CTB Project: Probabilistic Forecasts of...
Transcript of Probabilistic forecast skill of extreme weather in …...CTB Project: Probabilistic Forecasts of...
Probabilistic forecast skill of extreme Probabilistic forecast skill of extreme
weather in weeks 1weather in weeks 1--4 in the United4 in the United
States d ring interStates d ring interStates during winterStates during winter
Charles JonesCharles Jones11 Jon GottschalkJon GottschalkCharles JonesCharles Jones11, Jon Gottschalk, , Jon Gottschalk, Leila CarvalhoLeila Carvalho11, Wayne Higgins, Wayne Higgins
11University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara
CTB Project: Probabilistic Forecasts of Extreme Events and Weather Hazards over the United States
Goal: develop experimental probabilistico Goal: develop experimental probabilisticforecasts of extreme events and risk ofweather related hazards
o Extremes: heavy precipitation, lowtemperature and high wind speeds
o Season: wintero Lead times: Weeks 1-4 – emphasis on
k 2 3weeks 2-3
2
Extreme precipitation events
Work in progress
Developing an experimental probabilistic forecast modelCalibration issuesPreliminary validations yCurrent work
3
Extreme precipitation events
Winter: 1 Nov – 31 Mar
Extreme: daily amountExtreme: daily amount greater than 90th
percentile of monthly pdf
Observations: CPC daily griddedObservations: CPC daily gridded precipitation 1981-2008
4
Extreme precipitation: persistencepersistence
On average: ~1-2 days
Extremes of the extremes:Extremes of the extremes:Maximum persistence (1981-2008)
5
A prototype probabilistic forecast model of extreme events
NCEP CFS ReforecastsHindcasts performed for each winter (1981-2008)Basic calibrations:
1. remove mean model biasTake season out, use remaining winters to estimate biasBias computed for each month (Nov-Mar) and lead time 1-28 days y
2. Percentile adjustmentPdf comparison: obs and CFS 30-yr free runsDone for each month separately (Nov-Mar)p y ( )
6
Mean model bias (averaged Nov-Mar; weeks 1-4)
Week-1 Week-2
Week-3 Week-47
Percentile adjustment
Model
Observations
P90th
P90thR =
P90
P90th=CFS percentile in 30-yr free run
8
A prototype probabilistic forecast model of extreme events
Hi d t
1 Nov 31 Mar
Hindcasts: each winter (81-08)daily (1 Nov-31 Mar)
W k 1 W k 2 W k 3 W k 4
T0: Forecast release day
Week-1 Week-2 Week-3 Week-4
Δ T
Consider all CFS members with ICs Δ T days prior to T0 T0: Forecast release dayΔ Ty
Δ T : eight weeks – motivation e.g., MJO influence on extremes
Two forecast products:
1) probability of extreme on each day in weeks 1-4 (timing important)
2) b bilit f X ≥ t i W k k (ti i t i t t)2) probability of X ≥ x extremes in Week-k (timing not important)
Pi= n / N n=members predicting extremes; N=total number members; ~14 25 9N=total number members; ~14-25
Validation
Brier skill score (BSS)
Ob i Ok 0 ( ) 1 ( )Observation: Ok = 0 (no event); 1 (yes event)Forecast: yk = probability of X ≥ x extremes in week-kValidation in each winter season separatelyValidation in each winter season separately
P(X ≥ 2 extremes in a week)
10
BSS: two or more extremes in a week – winter 2000
Week-1 Week-2ee ee
Week-3 Week-4
11
BSS: two or more extremes in a week – winter 2002
Week-1 Week-2
Week-3 Week-4
12
Percentage of winters BSS ≥ 5%
Week-1 Week-2ee
Week-3 Week-4
13
Maximum BSS two or more extremes in a week
Week-1 Week-2Week 1 Week-2
Week-3 Week-4
14
Significant interannual variations in forecast skill
Verification X ≥ 2 events in a weekVerification X ≥ 2 events in a week
Percentage of region with BSS ≥ 5%with BSS ≥ 5%
15
Percentage of region with BSS ≥ 5%
Verification X ≥ 2 events in a weekVerification X ≥ 2 events in a week
16
Percentage of region with BSS ≥ 5%
Verification X ≥ 2 events in a weekVerification X ≥ 2 events in a week
17
Percentage of region with BSS ≥ 5%
V ifi ti X ≥ 2 t i kVerification X ≥ 2 events in a week
18
SummaryProbabilistic forecast model of extreme events based on CFSreforecasts:
Potentially usefulThere is skill, sometimes much better than climatologyReliability is low (poor resolution; overconfident)Need to develop additional calibrationsp
Current WorkFurther understand interannual variations in skill
Modulation by the MJO:yJones et al. (2004), J. Climate, 17, 4575-4589.
Modulation by ENSODevelop additional probabilistic models: combination of CFSp pand others (e.g., statistical MJO)Implementation in real-time
19