Private Capital in the Wake of the Crisis - Brookings Institution...Decade-plus disappointment in...
Transcript of Private Capital in the Wake of the Crisis - Brookings Institution...Decade-plus disappointment in...
Private Capital in the Wake of the Crisis
Josh Lerner
Harvard Business School
Time of many questions
Recovery in private equity deal volume...– More limited resurgence of debt financing.
But residual unhappiness of limited partners:– Interest in “going it alone.”– Questions about explosion in secondary deal
activity.
And looming regulatory and tax uncertainties world-wide.
Suggests several possibilities
Will outline four scenarios:– Recovery.– Back to the future.– The LPs’ desertion.– A broken industry.
Four scenariosConstant Investor
BaseTurnover in Investor
Base
“Fair” Returns Recovery Back to the Future
Disappointing Returns A Broken Industry The LPs’ Desertion
Scenario 1: Recovery
VC and PE are inherently cyclical:– Too much investment during booms.– Too high-priced investments during booms.
But there is a well-defined value proposition associated with these investments.
While things may get out of balance in booms, steady state works well:– Classic process of recalibration going on right
now.
IPOs and VC investmentsIPOs and Number of Investments -- Internet and
Computers
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003
Inve
stm
ents
020406080100120140160180200
IPO
s
IPOs Investments
IPOs and Number of Investments -- Biotech and Healthcare
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003
Inve
stm
ents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
IPO
s
IPOs Investments
IPOs and Number of Investments -- Communications
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003
Inve
stm
ents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70IP
Os
IPOs Investments
IPOs and Number of Investments -- Energy
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003
Inve
stm
ents
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
IPO
s
IPOs Investments
Source: Gompers, Kovner, Lerner and Scharfstein [2008].
Debt and LBO multiples over the cycle
Source: Axelson, Jenkinson, Stromberg, and Weisbach [2009].
Also true at a fund level
• Funds do better as they get larger… to a point!
• Fund size is measured as capital committed at closing.
• Regression results control for vintage year effect, location, and fund category.0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
10 20 50 100
200
500
1,000
2,00
05,
000
Pred
icte
d R
elat
ive
IRR
Fund Size ($ millions)
Buyout
Venture Capital
Source: Lerner, Leamon and Hardymon [2011]
Private equity and management practices
Source: Bloom, Sandun, and van Reenen [2009].
Implications
Gradual recovery of returns reflecting fundamental value creation.
Inflow of funds back into VC/PE market.
Repeating boom/bust pattern that has characterized industry through 1950s.
Scenario 2: Back to the future
Returns to limited partners are inherently “undemocratic.”– Skewness of returns:
Only a few funds are winners.Trend seems to be intensifying.
– Most investors have done poorly, and will gradually abandon programs.
Returns of U.S. venture funds
Returns from inception to 12/31/09. Source: Authors’ analysis of Thomson/Reuters data.
Returns of U.S. buyout funds
Returns from inception to 12/31/09. Source: Authors’ analysis of Thomson/Reuters data.
European private equity returns
-100%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
100th percentile
90th percentile
80th percentile
70th percentile
60th percentile
50th percentile
40th percentile
30th percentile
20th percentile
10th percentile
0th percentile
Returns of 1227 funds from inception to 12/31/09. Source: Venture Economics.
Persistence of performance
Bottom Medium Top
Bottom Tercile 61% 22% 17%
Medium Tercile 25% 45% 30%
Top Tercile 27% 24% 48%
• High likelihood that the next funds of a given partnership stays in the same performance bracket Persistence.
• 1% boost in past performance → 0.77% boost in next fund’s performance.Source: Kaplan and Schoar [2005]
Performance by investor type, private equity funds between 1992 and 2001
-5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Endowments
Private Pensions
Insurance Companies
Public Pensions
Funds-of-Funds
Banks
Source: Lerner, Schoar and Wongsunwai [2007]
Implications
Questioning of assumptions behind private equity in many investment committees.– Exit by many LPs who have:
Newer programs. “Too large” or “too small” mandates.
Limited number of LPs will remain, and will thrive.
Scenario 3: The LPs’ desertion
Poor returns may lead LPs to essentially abandon asset class:– Precedent of oil-and-gas partnerships,
others.
May conclude that inherently impossible to set right.
Fees have driven sharp wedge between net and gross returns
Payments per partner per fund, based on 240+ PE/VC partnerships ($MMs):
VC LBO– Carried interest: 5.2 10.1– Management fees 10.6 18.5– Other fees: 1.3 4.1– Total 17.1 32.7
• Metrick and Yasuda [2009]
An non-addressable issue?
Failure to get traction partially reflected proponents and timing.
But more fundamental challenges:– Fractured nature of LP community.– Competition between LPs to get into top
funds.– Turnover within LPs.
Implications
Decreasing LP pool.
Extensive exit by funds.
Increasing reliance on non-institutionalized capital sources.
Scenario 4: A broken industry
Due to measurement issues and organization dynamics, PE groups may continue to raise funds.
Even if returns are not there!– May continue for years or decades more…
Example of VC industry?!
Decade-plus disappointment in venture capital
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Distributed/paid-in capital, by vintage year, U.S. VC funds
Average
Median
1997 is last year with >0 median and mean return
Source: Thomson/Reuters. Data as of 9/30/09.
Exits by venture funds ($B)
Source: Sand Hill Econometrics
Investments by venture funds ($B)
Source: Sand Hill Econometrics
Implications
Reactions by LPs may be very slow.– Triumph of hope over experience?!– In many cases, may draw wrong
conclusions:E.g., shift to direct investments by sovereign
funds.
Suggests period of protracted disappointment.
Final thoughts
Time to step back and think about where business is going.
Can plausibly tell a variety of stories, with supporting evidence.
All have elements of truth, but… – Believe some combination of first and
second scenario is most plausible.
Josh LernerRock Center for Entrepreneurship
Harvard Business SchoolBoston, MA 02163
617-495-6065
josh @ hbs.eduwww.people.hbs.edu/jlerner