Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden
Price setting in the electricity markets within the EU ... Denmark Finland Ireland Sweden UK Small...
-
Upload
nguyenlien -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Price setting in the electricity markets within the EU ... Denmark Finland Ireland Sweden UK Small...
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
PRICE SETTING IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKETS
WITHIN THE EU SINGLE MARKET
A report to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy of the
European ParliamentFebruary, 2006
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Outline
• Characteristics of the main electricity markets,
• European price structures and trends,• Impact on electricity prices of emissions
trading,• Long-term contracts effects,• Conclusions.
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Main electricity markets characteristics
• Facts:– Common agreement on unified electricity market,– Cross-border trade at about 8% of EU consumption,– Lack of interconnecting capacity between countries,– Very low number of producers as bidders,
• Results:– No EU integrated market yet ►
• Local markets,• Regional markets- operating and developing.
– Not all regional markets function up to standards,– W.EU vs. E.EU countries market development: indecisive,
• More detailed insight needed.
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
International interdependence, 2003
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100
UK & Ireland
Iberia
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
Nordic
Baltic
EU
Import Capacity as a % of InstalledCapacity*
Exports %
Imports %
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Level of network unbundling, 2005
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5
GreeceLuxembourg
CyprusCzech Republic
EstoniaHungary
IrelandLatvia
PolandSlovakiaSlovenia
AustriaBelgium
DenmarkFrance
GermanyLithuania
FinlandItaly
NetherlandsPortugal
SpainSweden
UK†
Unbundling index (5 max)
Distribution system operatorTransmission system operator
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Market opening, 2005
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Baltic
Eastern Europe
EU
Western Europe
UK & Ireland
Iberia
Nordic
Market opening
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Competition in retail and generation, 2005
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Poland
Italy
Czech Republic
Germany
Hungary
UK
Austria
Nordic
Slovenia
Slovakia
Spain
France
Ireland
Netherlands
Belgium
Latvia
Portugal
Cyprus
Greece
Lithuania
MaltaSh
are
(%)
Country
Largest producer bycapacity**
Top 3 suppliers' share(all consumers)
To high market power?
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Level of customers switching supplier, 2005
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Cyprus
Estonia
Greece
Latvia
Malta
Portugal
Luxembourg
Poland
Slovakia
Slovenia
Italy
Lithuania
Spain
Austria
France
Hungary
Netherlands
Belgium
Germany
Denmark
Finland
Ireland
Sweden
UK
Small commercial / domesticLarge eligible industrial users
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Pricing structures
• Tariffs:– Liberalisation let to more competing tariffs,– Number of tariffs reduced with market regulation,– Social tariffs to domestic customers,– Industrial consumers have a wider choice of tariffs than
domestic customers.• Price convergence:
– Regions reached more price convergence than EU as a whole,
– Convergence of prices improves with stronger interconnection,
• Accession members without electricity taxes.
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Price trends
• Electricity prices:– Downward trend 1995 - 2000, higher productivity– Stable period– Growth after 2004.
• Reasons for prices growth:– Rising prices of gas,– Dwindling surpluses of electricity,– Inadequate EU electricity market model,– No feedback for new:
• generating units,• transmission and distribution capacities,• remuneration of investment (marginal prices → variable costs).
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Average price development
Consumer
3.5 MWh/year
Industrialconsumer
2.0 MWh/year
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Breakdown of electricity prices, 2004
(50 MWh /year customer) (€/MWh before taxes)
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
ETA impact on electricity prices
• Emission trading allowances (ETA) for CO2:– Producer obtains the certificates,– If he needs more he has to buy them in the market.
• Market prices of allowances:– Significant initial price transient,– Less impact on the end user than on wholesale prices (long term contracts),– Industry can not get compensation for its losses.
• Auction could:– Finance the CO2 reduction or– Transfer wealth from polluters to government or reverse,– Appropriate model required.
• Simulation (by sparks spreads): – Most if not all of the allowance cost passed into electricity wholesale price,– Estimated impact on wholesale electricity price (20 - 30)%
• Lack of empirical evidence to judge (to short time).
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Price evolution of emission allowance
€
–Shot up in the summer 2005 (due to increased gas prices, drought and adverse weather),–Stabilized afterwards,
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Spark spreads (Simulation results)(=the difference between electricity prices and fuel costs for gas plants)
Since the spark spread net allowances are equal the sector passes on its entire costs
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Retail prices in Slovenia (band 2003-2005)
Gibanje cen za PAS med leti 2007 do 2009
30,00
35,00
40,00
45,00
50,00
55,00
01.10
.2003
01.12
.2003
01.02
.2004
01.04
.2004
01.06
.2004
01.08
.2004
01.10
.2004
01.12
.2004
01.02
.2005
01.04
.2005
01.06
.2005
01.08
.2005
01.10
.2005
01.12
.2005
datum oblikovanja cene
EUR
/ M
Wh
PAS 07 PAS 08 PAS 09
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Long term contracts
• Lack of long-term contracts is considered to be the sole reason behind the California electricity crisis.
• Relatively low energy volume in the EU spot markets.• Reasons:
– High market power of producers in EU electricity market, – Industrial electricity users shield themselves from the volatility of the
market prices - risk reduction,– Collusive activity less attractive,– Ensuring stability of prices,– Encourage investment in a very capital-intensive, slow-return industry,– Incentive for entering new providers,– Timing of essential maintenance work - increase of electricity availability,
• Will not solve growing problem of production and supply mismatch.
April 20, 2006 F. Gubina
Conclusions
• The report: – on various aspect of EU electricity markets and– suggestion for policies development.
• Desirable:– Increasing cross-border connectivity,– Promoting long-term contracts,– Continuous monitoring of price development,– Electricity market model correction to accommodate the
growing problem of production and supply mismatch.• Emission trading scheme:
– Positive for controlling emissions,– Model should be monitored for its possible adverse effects.