Prevalence of malnutrition - Philspenonline Main Page of malnutrition.pdf · Orthopedic 43%...
Transcript of Prevalence of malnutrition - Philspenonline Main Page of malnutrition.pdf · Orthopedic 43%...
Prevalence of malnutrition Prevalence of malnutrition in the hospitalin the hospital
Implications of malnutrition and how to Implications of malnutrition and how to manage the problemmanage the problem
Objectives of the presentationObjectives of the presentation
To define malnutritionTo define malnutritionTo present the problem of malnutrition in the To present the problem of malnutrition in the hospitalhospitalTo present the consequences of malnutrition in To present the consequences of malnutrition in patient care and impact of nutrition carepatient care and impact of nutrition careTo present the nutrition support processTo present the nutrition support process
What is malnutrition?What is malnutrition?Deficiency or excess in nutrition reserves of the Deficiency or excess in nutrition reserves of the body which would affect:body which would affect:
Body compositionBody compositionFunctions of daily livingFunctions of daily living
Nutrition components affected are:Nutrition components affected are:Macronutrients (Protein, fat, carbohydrates)Macronutrients (Protein, fat, carbohydrates)Micronutrients (Electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements)Micronutrients (Electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements)
Manifestations:Manifestations:UndernutritionUndernutritionOvernutritionOvernutrition
Year Author Location Prevalence
1974 Bistrian US 50%1977 Hill England 44%
1979 Weinsier US 48%1984 Agradi Italy 34%1993 Larsson Sweden 27%1994 McWhirter Scotland 40%1995 Fernando Philippines 48%
1997 Waitzberg Brazil 47%
Malnutrition exists in every hospital: Malnutrition exists in every hospital: internationalinternational
Malnutrition exists in every hospital: Malnutrition exists in every hospital: local (Philippines)local (Philippines)
HospitalHospital BMI < 18.5BMI < 18.5 BMI > 30BMI > 30 SGA SGA ““CC””
Marikina, RizalMarikina, Rizal 38%38% 15%15% --
LipaLipa City, City, BatangasBatangas 48%48% --
Quezon CityQuezon City 22%22% 20%20% --
ManilaManila -- -- 42%42%
• Amang Rodriguez Medical Center (n = 61)
• Mary Mediatrix Medical Center (n = 2,345)
• St. Luke’s Medical Center (n = 41,676)
• Philippine General Hospital (n = 151)
Malnutrition exists in every hospital: Malnutrition exists in every hospital: one center one center –– all unitsall units
69% Adequate Nutritional State
21% ModeratelyMalnourished
10% Severely Malnourished
Detsky AS et al. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1987; 440-446.
Types of malnutrition in hospitalized Types of malnutrition in hospitalized patientspatients
Is it easy to perform a prevalence of Is it easy to perform a prevalence of malnutrition study?malnutrition study?
How the first prevalence of How the first prevalence of malnutrition was done (St. Lukemalnutrition was done (St. Luke’’s)s)Project involved 25 peopleProject involved 25 people
6 dietitians (hospital staff)6 dietitians (hospital staff)10 volunteer dietitians (from a school of nutrition)10 volunteer dietitians (from a school of nutrition)5 physicians5 physicians4 nurses4 nurses
Tools usedTools usedBody mass indexBody mass indexSerum albuminSerum albuminClinical examination Clinical examination –– ““eyeballingeyeballing”” the patientthe patient
Project completed in three (3) weeksProject completed in three (3) weeks
Hospital malnutrition: St. LukeHospital malnutrition: St. Luke’’s datas data
1995 1995 48%48%NeuroNeuro 78%78%Geriatric 75%Geriatric 75%Pulmonary 67%Pulmonary 67%Cancer 64%Cancer 64%ICU ICU 58%58%Surgical 52%Surgical 52%Medical 47%Medical 47%Orthopedic 43%Orthopedic 43%Pediatric 32%Pediatric 32%
1998 1998 34%34%Cancer 53%Cancer 53%Pulmonary 52%Pulmonary 52%Orthopedic 48%Orthopedic 48%Pediatric 38%Pediatric 38%Medical 36%Medical 36%NeuroNeuro 30%30%ICU 27%ICU 27%Surgical 25%Surgical 25%Geriatric 21%Geriatric 21%
Prevalence of Malnutrition in St. Luke’s Medical Center, 1995 & 1998
BMI, clinical exam, albumin (25 people: 5 phys, 6 ClinDn, 10 volDn, 4 nurses; 3 weeks)
BMI (15 people, 3 days)
Malnutrition = UW, OW w/ BMI >27, OB
Conclusion and realizationConclusion and realization
Performing a prevalence of malnutrition is not Performing a prevalence of malnutrition is not easy using the usual toolseasy using the usual toolsPrevalence determination has to be completed Prevalence determination has to be completed within the expected time frame within the expected time frame –– 24 hours24 hoursApproaches:Approaches:
Computerize the processComputerize the processPerform in small groups one at a time, then combine Perform in small groups one at a time, then combine the data expressed in percentagesthe data expressed in percentagesUse sampling from all representative areasUse sampling from all representative areas
Nutrition committee organized
Diet manual completed
TPN team organized
TPN team became NST
First prevalence of malnutrition
survey
Second prevalence of malnutrition
survey
Nutrition support program (JCAHO)
Computerizationimplemented
• nutrition support monitoring sheet• progress notes• communication with attending MD
• outcome documentation
1984
1986 1988
1992
1995
1998
1999
2000
Lone ranger phase:dietitian then physician
Team without administration support
Dietitian writes order sheet,calorie count
The St. Luke’s NST journey
Prevalence of malnutrition influences NST development
The tools for prevalence determinationThe tools for prevalence determination
Body Mass IndexBody Mass Index<18.5 underweight<18.5 underweight18.5 18.5 –– 24.9 normal24.9 normal25 25 –– 29.9 overweight29.9 overweight30+ obese30+ obese
Severe weight lossSevere weight loss>5% in 1 month>5% in 1 month>7.5% in 3 months>7.5% in 3 months>10% in 6 months>10% in 6 months
Nutrition screening tool: NRS 2002Nutrition screening tool: NRS 2002
STEP 1 - Initial ScreeningQuestions Yes No
• Is BMI < 20.5?
• Has the patient lost weight within the last three (3) months?
• Did the patient have a reduced dietary intake in the last week?
• Is the patient severely ill (e.g. in intensive therapy)?
□ Current Status: No nutritional risk
□ If YES to any question go to STEP 2