Pretest questions The recommended ages for routine developmental screening tests are: 12m, 24m, 36m...
Transcript of Pretest questions The recommended ages for routine developmental screening tests are: 12m, 24m, 36m...
Pretest questionsThe recommended ages for routine developmental screening tests are: 12m, 24m, 36m *9m, 18m, 24/30m 6m, 18m, 24/30m 6m, 12m, 24m
The prevalence for developmental disabilities in children is approximately: 1% 5% *15% 30%
Disclosures
I did not, do not, and likely will not have any financial relationships with proprietary entities that produce goods or services
I am the medical director for the new Dayton Autism Center and have a vested interest in seeing children receive the best health care
Objectives
Understand the reasons for developmental/behavioral monitoring
Learn the importance of Surveillance vs Screening
Experience specific tools (examples) for screening
Did You Know?● Prevalence of developmental disabilities 1 in 7
children (~14%)● Most developmental disabilities are
● Learning disabilities – 7.6%● ADHD – 6.7%● Intellectual disability – 0.7%● Autism – 0.47%
Blumberg SJ. Trends in the Prevalence of DD in US Children, 1997-2008. Presented at National Conference on Health Statistics, August 2012
Over the 12 years, increase of
------------17%
------------33%
------------290%
A little more on autism
– 1975, 1 in 5000: 0.2/1000– 1985, 1 in 2500: 0.4/1000– 1995, 1 in 500: 2/1000– 2001, 1 in 250: 4/1000– 2006, 1 in 110: 9/1000 (CDC)– 2008, 1 in 88: 11/1000 (CDC)– 2013, 1 in 50: 20/1000 (CDC)*
* Health Resources and Services Administration and Centers for Disease Control report – Mar13
What’s causing the rise? Many factors
Diagnostic change Substitution (X → Y)
Accretion (X → X + Y) Broadening (x → X)
Advanced parental age Social influence and increased awareness
Better education/Increased information dissemination Spatial clustering Advocacy interest groups National/International coverage
Other factors?
2009 Amer J Epidemiology2009 Oct Int J Epidemiol 2010 Mar Amer J Sociology
Benefits of Monitoring
• Screening works• Results in access to services• Cost effective• Improves patient/family satisfaction• Because we are told to!
Early Intervention EfficacyPediatric Care Intervention
Arkansas 85 99
Einstein 74 85
Harvard 96 97
Miami 66 81
PA 92 95
Texas 80 87
Washington92 100
Yale 91 103
TOTAL 85 94
JAMA. 1990;263:3035-3042
Effects of Psychosocial Risk Factors on Intelligence
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7+80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
IQ
RISKS: < HS parental education, > 3 children, > stressful life events, single parent, parental mental health problems, < responsive parenting,
poverty, minority status, < social support
Cost Effective• The cost of treating developmental problems early
is substantially lower than treating a patient who is diagnosed late.
• May save society $30,000-$100,000 per child
Patient and Family Satisfaction• Parents want and expect support on child
development.• Screening can encourage parent involvement and
investment in child’s health care.
Because we said so…• AAP Council on Children with Disabilities
recommends routine surveillance and standardized developmental and behavioral screening. • Pediatrics 2006 Jul
• Policy reinforced in American Academy of Family Physicians AFP journal article. • Am Fam Physician. 2011 Sep
Guidelines
Developmental surveillance at every well-child preventative care visit
Developmental screening tests if:– Concerns exist, OR– Regularly at the 9-, 18-, 30-month visits
Children identified with developmental disorders should be identified with a special health care need, and chronic-condition management should be initiated
What is Surveillance?
A flexible, continuous process, in which knowledgeable professionals perform skilled observations of children during child health care (in consultation w/families,
specialists, child care providers, etc).
SM Dworkin, A Shannon, and P Dworkin. ChildServ Curriculum. Center for Children’s Health and Development, St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center; 1999; Hartford, CT.
Surveillance: 5 Components
• Eliciting and attending to the parent’s concerns
• Maintaining a developmental history
• Identifying the presence of risk and protective factors
• Making accurate and informed observations of the child
• Documenting the process and findings
AAP Policy - Pediatrics 2006; 118; 405-420
What is Screening?
• Brief procedure using a standardized and validated developmental tool at pre-determined times
• Goal to differentiate children that are "probably ok" vs. "needing additional investigation”
• Performed at set points (eg. 9, 18, 24/30 months) OR if a specific concern arises*
*AAP Policy - Pediatrics 2006; 118; 405-420
Developmental SurveillanceVersus
Developmental Screening
Courtesy of Paul Lipkin MD FAAP: D-PIP Training Workshop
9 Months
18 Months24/30 Months
A Typical Challenge
• Roger, new pt well visit, 2 years old
• Upset and crying when he checks in
• Mother reports he has limited words, does not listen, and has “temper tantrums” when he does not get his way
How is this currently handled in your clinic?How would you like to handle it?
Screening’s Role
• In the optimal setting, primary care physicians have good surveillance skills - BUT
• Screening compliments continuous surveillance
• Research indicates effective screening is not always being done
Pediatrician Recognition of Developmental and Behavioral Problems
8.7
13
5.7
11
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Preschool BehavioralProblems
School-Age BehaviorProblems
Identified
Prevalence
Per
cent
of
Chi
ldre
n
Costello et al. Pediatrics. 1988;82:415-424
Sources: J. V. Lavigne et al, Pediatrics, Mar. 1993 91(3):649–55; E. J. Costello et al., “Pediatrics, Sept. 1988 82(3 Pt. 2):415–24. Slide thanks to: Edward L. Schor, MD
Detection RatesWithout Tools With Tools
• 20% of mental health problems identified (Lavigne et al. Pediatrics. 1993; 91:649-655)
• 30% of developmental disabilities identified (Palfrey et al. JPEDS. 1994; 111:651-655)
• 80-90% with mental health problems identified
(Sturner, JDBP 1991; 12:51-64)
• 70-80% with developmental disabilities correctly identified
(Squires et al., JDBP 1996; 17:420-427)
Past PracticesDuring Primary Care Visits
• Only 15-20% of pediatricians routinely use screening tests
• Most rely on developmental milestones or prompting for parental concern
• Only half of physicians in a national survey have a validated developmental screening instrument in their offices
• The Denver-II continues to be the predominant choice
JDBP 24:409–417, 2003
The bad news…
Practices that do not regularly screen for developmental, behavioral and emotional problems may miss opportunities for early referral and treatment.
Barriers to Screening• Time
• Knowledge of tools and methods
• Familiarity with coding and billing procedures
• Referral resources
JDBP 2003; 24:409–417
Challenges for Providers
• Resistance from within
• Lack of education on tools and their use
• Expectations about children’s development
• The “wait and see” approach
• Continued reliance on observations
• Failure to trust screening tests or results
• Reliance on poor quality or homemade tools
Challenges to Evaluating Children
• Development exists on a continuum
• Children manifest skills variably, inconsistently
• Developmental/behavioral problems increase with age– 2-3% of 0-18 month olds– 10% of 24-72 month olds– 16% of 0-21 year olds
The good news…
The use of standardized screening tools increased significantly between 2002-2009.
According to AAP periodic survey of fellows:• 2002: 23% used one or more tools (always/almost always)• 2009: 47% used one or more tools (always/almost always)
• Tools used: BINS, Denver II, ASQ, PEDS
Pediatrics 2011; 128: 14-19
Summary/Intermission
Developmental Screening is:
• Recommended by AAP & AAFP
• Different than surveillance
• Beneficial to children and practices
• Underutilized
• Challenging but rewarding to implement
Tool TimeTool Ages Admin time Psychometrics Comments
Ages and Stages Questionnaire
B-66m 10-15m,1-3m scoring
Normed, broad population
$225Unlimited copy
Battelle Dev Inventory
B-95m 10-30m direct
Normed, broad population
$1280
Bayley Infant Screen
3-24m 10-15m direct
Normed, broad population
$225
Brigance B-90m 10-15m direct
Normed, broad population
$299 + data sheets
Denver 0-6y 10-20m direct
Normed, narrow population
Parents’ Eval of Dev Status
0-8y 2-10m,1-2m scoring
Standardized, broad population
$36/ 50 copies
I do not have any financial ties to any of these products (or any other ties!)
• Time required: • Parent 10-15 minutes to
complete• 3 minutes to score
• Cost: One time purchase; photocopying permitted or print from CD
• Features: Age-appropriate sensitivity and specificity; comes with suggestions for parents
• Adapted from: Michelle Macias MD FAAP, D PIP Training
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) 2 Months to 5 Years
• 21 questionnaires from 1-66 months
• 30 - 35 items per form describing skills
• Taps 5 domains of development
• Validity is .82-.88; Test-retest reliability is .91 and inter-rater reliability is .92
• ASQ-Social-Emotional (ASQ-SE) works similarly and measures behavior, temperament, etc.
What’s new in ASQ-3?
2 and 9 month old questionnaire “Anytime screening” – ages 1-66 months Larger standardization population (15,138) Improved sensitivity (.86) and specificity (.85) Revised illustrations, wording, examples to
improve accuracy
Ages & Stages™ Sample Items
1. When your child wants something, does she tell you by pointing to it?
Yes Sometimes Not Yet
4. Does your child say eight or more words in addition to “Mama” and “Dada”?
Yes Sometimes Not Yet
Ages & Stages™ Sample Item 48 months
Using the shapes below to look at, does your child copy at least three shapes onto a large piece of paper using a pencil or crayon, without tracing? Your child’s drawings should look similar to the design of the shapes below, but they may be different in size.
Yes Sometimes Not Yet
ASQ Scoring
Communication
Gross Motor
Fine Motor
Problem Solving
Personal-Social
• Assign a value of 10 to yes, 5 to sometimes, 0 to not yet.• Be sure each item has been answered• The scoring grid below shows the cutoff score for each
domain, indicated by the dark bar• Any score touching or in the dark bar requires further
evaluation
Autism Spectrum DisordersThere has been a 600% increase in prevalence
in the past 20 years1 in 50 children*
* Health Resources and Services Administration and Centers for Disease Control report – Mar13
Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT)
• Administered at 16-30 months• 23 questions expanded and adapted from earlier CHAT
(English or Spanish) – 1999• Modified to update/clarify language – 2009 • Free: www.m-chat.org • Available in >25 languages (including Icelandic)• Can be scored in 2-5 minutes by a professional or
paraprofessional• Yes/No responses convert to Pass/Fail responses
M-CHAT
• Considered “High-risk” if fails 8 or more items• Recommended to refer directly for diagnostic
evaluation
• Considered “Medium-risk” if fails 3 to 7 items• Recommended to administer follow-up (second
stage) questions
• Considered “Low-risk” if fails 2 or less items• Recommended to continue routine surveillance and
screening.
• Not all children who fail the checklist will meet all criteria for diagnosis on the autism spectrum
M-CHATR Follow-up
Question/interview algorithm designed to further validate M-CHATR results
Failure of any 2 items is considered significant– Refer for diagnostic testing
SummaryConduct surveillance at every pediatric health
supervision visitConduct screening when concerns arise OR at
set intervals (9, 18, 24/30 months) If failure/concerns noted on screening tools
– Refer family to Early Intervention/Help-Me-Grow services
– Begin evaluation process (hearing, speech evaluation, etc)
– Consider referral for full diagnostic evaluation (developmental pediatrics, child psychology, neurology, etc)