PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY
description
Transcript of PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY
PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY
Patrizia Ballerini Chieti, 06 giugno 2014
Presidential Decree 01/02/2010
ANVURNational Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Reasearch
Institutesart. 2, point 3, states: “The Agency functions as national agency for the quality assurance …”.
Self-assesment, assesment and accreditationA.V.A. -System
ANVUR Document 28/01/2013
In agreement with ESG
Objectives:•To promote quality in higher education institutions •To give the CofS and the research units comparative elements for quality improvement in their activities •To provide MIUR with the necessary information for the development of a national program (insititution /suppression of CofS; funds distribution ) •To give the society trusty and clear information about the activities of the university system
Ministry Decree n.47/2013 Ministry Decree 1059/2013
Adoption of the criteria for Accrediation and Periodic assesment of Institutions and CofS
Presidential Decree 01/02/2010
ANVURNational Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Reasearch
Institutesart. 2, point 3, states: “The Agency functions as national agency for the quality assurance …”.
ANVUR Document 28/01/2013
In agreement with ESG
Self-assesment, assesment and accreditationA.V.A. -System
Self -assesment
Accreditation Periodic assesment External Evaluation
Internal Evaluation
Education
Research
A.V.A. System
In agreement with ESG:External QAInternal QA
European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area(ESG)
1. Policy and procedures for quality assurance2. Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes and awards3. Assessment of students 4. Quality assurance of teaching staff5. Learning resources and student support6. Information systems7. Public information
THERE IS NO INTENTION THAT THE ESG SHOULD DICTATE PRACTICE OR BE INTERPRETED AS PRESCRIPTIVE OR UNCHANGEABLE.
WITH RESPECT OF:
AUTONOMYRESPONSABILITY
EVALUATION
Part 1 (iQA)
European Standards and Guidelines (ESG)
1. Policy and procedures for quality assurance2. Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes and awards3. Assessment of students 4. Quality assurance of teaching staff5. Learning resources and student support6. Information systems7. Public information
ANVUR considers the QA the base of the system of assessment and accreditation of Study Programms
• guidelines for the QA of SPs;• the required documentation (or the
‘documental model’) for the iQA.
‘FIT IN PURPOSE’(programme learning outcomes meet the needs and expectations of the stakeholders)
‘FIT FOR PURPOSE’(defines and implements actions suitable for achieving the declared aims)
THE GUIDELINES INDICATE WHAT iQA REQUIRES
freedom to define their own iQA system
respect of the ANVUR guidelines
establishment objectives and methods for their achievement and monitoring
autonomy
DOCUMENTAL MODEL:
information
data
to be made available
The Documentation for the Quality Assurance of Study Programmes (SP)
A form named ‘Annual Unique Form’ (SUA-CdS) to be updated yearly by every CofS.SUA-CdS is articulated in Sections, subdivided in the following ‘Areas’:Area A) Education ObjectivesArea B) Student’s ExperiencesArea C) Education ResultsArea D) Organisation the QA
public on the web site
access with password
ANVUR attributes to the re-examination the same meaning as the ISO
9000:2005 norm: a process programmed and scheduled, finalised to
assess the fitness, the adequacy and the effectiveness of SPs’ activities,
in order to implement all the necessary actions of correction and
improvement.
The Documentation for the Quality Assurance of Study Programmes (SP)
Re-examination Reportthis process is to be carried out:• yearly, in order to adopt all the appropriate actions finalised to the
improvement of the CofS management;• every 3-5 years, for the re-examination of the CofS objectives and design.
Report of the Paritetic Student-Teacher Committee this process is to be carried out:• yearly, in order to monitor the quality of the CofS, teaching ,human and
infrastructural resources, student support services; to individuate specific indicators for the evaluation of the CofS resultsto express opinion on the activation or closing of a single CofS
PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY
REQUIREMENT FOR ACCREDITATION OF THE INSTITUTION
REQUIREMENT FOR ACCREDITATION OF THE CofS
Ministry Decree n.47/2013 Ministry Decree 1059/2013
Self-assesment, assesment and accreditationA.V.A. -System
ANVUR Document 28/01/2013
RESPONSABILITY FOR POLITCS OF QUALITY : HIGH ACADEMIC BODIESRESPONSIBILITY OF ACADEMIC iQA: PRESIDIUM OF QUALITY
THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR QUALITY IS ON WHO OPERATES EVERY DAY WITHIN THE INSTITUTION AND NOT ON WHO ASSURES IT
PQAAcademic Bodies:
DeanSenateBoard of governorns NdV
Schools/DepartmentsCofS
•Evaluation by NdV•Evaluation by CEV (Periodic Accreditation)
PQAAcademic Bodies:
DeanSenateBoard of governorns NdV
Schools/DepartmentsCofS
•Evaluation by NdV•Evaluation by CEV (Periodic Accreditation)
NOT AN ACADEMIC POLITIC BODYNOT A REPRESENTATIVE ACADEMIC
BODY
PRESIDIUM OF QUALITYOperative responsibility for the University iQuality Assurance :
Realization of the Politcs of Quality (defined by the High Academic bodies)
Organization and supervision of common instruments (sources, data and forms) useful for the application of and carrying on the Quality Assurance procedures in the Insitution with attention to the ANVUR deadlines
Support for CofS and their Presidents/Coordinators and for the Schools/Departments on the mangement of the flow of information and of documents
Continuous Quality improving
Promotion of Quality culture
17
PQA(Dean Delegate for Quality)
Physical Sciences & Engineering(component)
Social Sciences & Humanities(component)
Life Sciences
(component)
University Statute, Art.31bis, Presidium of QualityDean Decree 29/02/2013
CO.N.P.A.Q
Healthcare Area(additionalcomponent)
Scientific Area(additionalcomponent)
Social sciences Area(additionalcomponent)
Humanities Area(additionalcomponent)
Support of the CofS for all the activities related to the preparation of A.V.A. documents within the schedule indicated by ANVUR
31.01.2014: drawing up of the first Re-examination Report 15.05.2014: drawing up sections of the SUA-CdS 2014 30.06.2013: drawing up of sections of the SUA-CdS 2014 30.09.2013: drawing up of sections of the SUA-CdS 2014 31.12.2015: drawing up of the Report of the Student-Teachers Paritetic
Commettee
PRESIDIUM OF QUALITYUniversity Statute, Art.31bis, Presidium of QualityDean Decree 29/02/2013
Strenght points: Composition (slim) Workability
Weakness points and improvement strategies: Composition (computer system technician) Communication modes (dedicated- interactive web site) Contacts with administrative offices and with NdV Auditing activities
OPEN PROBLEMS
OVERALP WITH SOME NdV ACTIVITIES
TOO MANY DOCUMENTS
FORMALISTIC PROCESS
NO RECOGNITION
OPEN PROBLEMS
OVERALP WITH SOME NdV ACTIVITIES
TOO MANY DOCUMENTS
FORMALISTIC PROCESS
NO RECOGNITION
OPEN PROBLEMS
“the proof of the pudding is in the eating”.
OVERALP WITH SOME NdV ACTIVITIES
TOO MANY DOCUMENTS
FORMALISTIC PROCESS
NO RECOGNITION