Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M.,...

13
Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects of computer g ents’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education, 52(1),68-77. The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning

Transcript of Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M.,...

Page 1: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Presenter: Han, Yi-TiAdviser: Chen, Ming-PuuDate: March 09, 2009

Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education, 52(1),68-77.

The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning

Page 2: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Interest in teaching and learning about geography is declining McNally III, 1987).

Many studies have pointed to the changing student characteristics in the new era, and indicated the need for a shift to a new pedagogy.

Ccomputer games have emerged as a frontier for geography education.

Researchers have also integrated three-dimensional (3D) environments into their game designs for geography learning. It was concluded that computer games could promote motivation, especially for at-risk students or for students with motivational problems.

Introduction

Page 3: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

The general purpose of this study was to examine the impacts of a computer game in geography learning by primary school students.

Specifically, the following questions were examined: • What is the achievement of students learning through the

game-based learning environment?• What is the nature of learners’ motivation in the game-

based learning environment and how this motivation differs from their traditional school environment?

• And what are the implementation issues when a computer game is used in geography curriculum?

Introduction

Page 4: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

MethodsA combination of quantitative (pre and post tests) and qualitative (observations, interviews, open-ended questions, and digital records) methods permitted a grounded understanding of the impact of computer games in geography education.School administration selected a group of students based on their grade averages and their willingness, and called this group as the Comenius Classroom (CC).

• 24 students (12 girls and 12 boys) from fourth to fifth grades.• no structured prior knowledge of the subject matter.

An educational computer game known as Quest Atlantis (QA) was selected for this study.

• QA is a socio-technical structure that facilitates learners in critiquing and improving themselves and the societies in which they live.

• The ‘‘Global Village” virtual world was developed in the QA universe.

Page 5: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Methods

Fig. 1. 2D and 3D components of Global Village game.

Page 6: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

The CC utilized the game environment for 3 weeks, an hour a day once a week.

24 students participated in the first week’s implementation that started by informing students about the procedure.

17 students participated in the second and third week’s implementation activities.

Week1• Introduction• School version of motivation scale

Week2• Pre achievement test• Game participation

Procedures

Page 7: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Week3• Game participation• Four open-ended questions

Procedures

‘What did you learn about continents and countries while exploring the Global Village?” ‘‘How and where you may use the information you obtained?” ‘‘How did you feel while collecting information in the Global Village; was it

fun or boring?” ‘‘What would you recommend to your friends using Global Village in the

future?”• Game version of motivation scale• Post achievement test• Interview with 2 players

Page 8: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Results-Qualitative data sources Quantitative data included an achievement test and a motivation scale.• An achievement test that was multiple-choice type including 17

questions was developed.• Two versions of the motivation scale were developed: One for

measuring motivation of students learning in their traditional school context, and the other for measuring motivation of students learning in the game-based learning context.

13 students (4 girls and 9 boys) attended all sessions during implementation.

A paired-sample t-test was conducted• to compare students’ learning before and after the intervention• to compare intrinsic and extrinsic motivations of students between the

school and game context

Page 9: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Results-Qualitative data sources

The students made significant learning gains by participating in the game-based learning environment. The mean score for post achievement test (M = 8.6, SD = 2.4) was higher than the mean score for pre achievement test (M = 6.2, SD = 1.0), and the difference was statistically significant (t (12) = 4.09, p < .01).The mean score for intrinsic motivation construct in the game context (M = 31.4, SD = 6.7) was higher than the mean score for intrinsic motivation construct in the school context (M = 27.6, SD = 7.2), and the difference was statistically significant (t (12) = 2.21, p < .05). The mean score for extrinsic motivation construct in the game context (M = 27.8, SD = 6.0) was lower than the mean score for extrinsic motivation construct in the school context (M = 31.7, SD = 5.5), and the difference was statistically significant (t (12) = 3.32, p < .01).

Page 10: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Results-Qualitative data sources

Page 11: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Qualitative results GBL Environment

General characteristics• a 3D MUVE (transporting, communicating)• Learning activities were presented with a general goal and

sub-goals with a storyline encompassing all of these goals• These general characteristics resulted in a fun learning

experience

General characteristics generated 4 affordences• Exploration • Interaction • Collaboration • Presence

Page 12: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Qualitative results

General implementation issues

Expectation of players: Players had high expectations from the game environment.

Players’ interest toward the game: Students played the game with great interest and enthusiasm.

Role of teachers: Many technical and non-technical problems arose, the support given by teachers.

Page 13: Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: March 09, 2009 Tuzun, H., Yilmaz Soylu, M., Karakus, T.,Inal, Y. & Kizilkaya, K.(2009). The effects.

Discussion and implications

Students achieved statistically significant learning gains when learning about world continents and countries through the Global Village game.When compared to the traditional school environment, students had statistically significant higher intrinsic motivations and statistically significant lower extrinsic motivations while learning through the game-based learning environment. Moreover, they had decreased focus on getting grades and they were more independent while participating in game-based activities. The role of the teachers became guide and manager rather than lecturer. Future studies could address these issues while reducing the limitations of this study by selecting participants with diverse computer and Internet literacy, willingness, familiarity with computer games, and socio-economic status.