Module 2 Section Ⅰ Section Ⅰ Step 1 Step 1 Step 2 Step 2 Step 3 Step 3 Step 4 Step 4 Step 5 Step 5.
Presented by: Devonna Abner Kelly Philbeck. Step 1: Determine needs Step 2: Create specific learning...
-
Upload
alberta-wilson -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
1
Transcript of Presented by: Devonna Abner Kelly Philbeck. Step 1: Determine needs Step 2: Create specific learning...
Watch Them Grow!Using LDC as a
Measure of Student Growth
Presented by:Devonna AbnerKelly Philbeck
Step 1:Determine
needs
Step 2:Create specific learning goals based on pre-assessment
Step 3:Create and implement
teaching and learning
strategies
Step 4:Monitor student progress through ongoing
formative assessment
Step 5:Determine whether students
achieved the goals
After identifying the Enduring
Skills, decide on the appropriate measurement. (Consider - Is
writing an appropriate method of
measurement for the
identified skill?)
Use the LDC template tasks
to create a classroom
assessment as part of the
baseline data. NOTE: This
writing product is evidence of what students
can do independently.
After analyzing classroom
assessment results, use that data to inform module and/or
mini-tasks design -
specifically, Section 2 (What
Skills?) and Section 3 (What
Instruction?).
During module implementation
, formative assessment
data will inform instructional
decisions. Build in additional
assessments for evidence of students’ abilities to
independently apply learning.
Use a classroom
assessment for summative SGG data for the enduring skill. (An LDC template task
may be used for the assessment
task.)
Student Growth Process
Literacy Design Collaborative Framework
Let’s take a look at the LDC scenario…
STEP 1: Determining Need – How did Mrs. Abner decide how to focus her goal and establish a baseline?
Step 1:Determine
needs
Step 2:Create specific learning goals based on pre-assessment
Step 3:Create and implement
teaching and learning
strategies
Step 4:Monitor student progress through ongoing
formative assessment
Step 5:Determine whether students
achieved the goals
After identifying the Enduring
Skills, decide on the appropriate measurement. (Consider - Is
writing an appropriate method of
measurement for the
identified skill?)
Use the LDC template tasks
to create a classroom
assessment as part of the
baseline data. NOTE: This
writing product is evidence of what students
can do independently.
After analyzing classroom
assessment results, use that data to inform module and/or
mini-tasks design -
specifically, Section 2 (What
Skills?) and Section 3 (What
Instruction?).
During module implementation
, formative assessment
data will inform instructional
decisions. Build in additional
assessments for evidence of students’ abilities to
independently apply learning.
Use a classroom
assessment for summative SGG data for the enduring skill. (An LDC template task
may be used for the assessment
task.)
Student Growth Process
Literacy Design Collaborative Framework
Contextual Data:◦Data that informs teachers of where students
are performing; aids your decision making for determining an area of focus for enduring skills: state assessments, interim assessments from previous year, common assignment/common assessment data, formative data, performance data
Baseline Data: ◦ Data that established a beginning point of where
students are against an enduring skill; provides a starting point for student growth goals
Contextual vs. Baseline data
Mrs. Abner’s 6th Grade Data
Contextual Data Baseline Data
Mrs. Abner’s 6th Grade Data
Contextual Data Baseline Data
Mrs. Abner’s 6th Grade Data
Contextual Data Baseline Data
MAP data from previous year LDC Assessment Task
K-PREP data from previous year
Cold Read/Cold Write
Formative Assessments Rubric
Student Observations/Content Area Tests/Grades per 9 weeks (ID area)
7 Scoring Elements
Performance Assessments/Products
STEM Activities
GT Assessments and areas of ID
Step 1:Determine
needs
Step 2:Create specific learning goals based on pre-assessment
Step 3:Create and implement
teaching and learning
strategies
Step 4:Monitor student progress through ongoing
formative assessment
Step 5:Determine whether students
achieved the goals
After identifying the Enduring
Skills, decide on the appropriate measurement. (Consider - Is
writing an appropriate method of
measurement for the
identified skill?)
Use the LDC template tasks
to create a classroom
assessment as part of the
baseline data. NOTE: This
writing product is evidence of what students
can do independently.
After analyzing classroom
assessment results, use that data to inform module and/or
mini-tasks design -
specifically, Section 2 (What
Skills?) and Section 3 (What
Instruction?).
During module implementation
, formative assessment
data will inform instructional
decisions. Build in additional
assessments for evidence of students’ abilities to
independently apply learning.
Use a classroom
assessment for summative SGG data for the enduring skill. (An LDC template task
may be used for the assessment
task.)
Student Growth Process
Literacy Design Collaborative Framework
Task Template: A5: After reading the articles “Be Afraid: Very Afraid” and “Scared Silly”, write an essay in which you compare fears and phobias and argue if fear is healthy or unhealthy for an individual. Support you position with evidence from the texts.
For baseline (independent, cold read/write, on demand like, no scaffolding of instruction) to determine baseline
Mrs. Turner’s Teaching Task
LDC Baseline Data Percentages:
1 2 3 4
Focus 32 63 5
Controlling Idea
11 32 37 10
Reading/Research
16 47 37
Development 11 52 32 5
Organization 32 57 11
Conventions 5 37 47 11
Content Understanding
11 52 26 11
What’s enduring learning?
ENDURES beyond a single test date is of value in other disciplines is relevant beyond the classroom (applying
learning to new and unique situations) is worthy of embedded, course-long focusmay be necessary for the next level of
instruction requires critical thinking (analyzing,
creating and evaluating)
Appendix: Argumentation Rubric for Grades 6–12 Teaching Tasks
Scoring Elements
Not Yet Approaches Expectations Meets Expectations Advanced
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Focus
Attempts to address prompt but lacks focus or is off task.
D: Attempts to address additional demands but lacks focus or is off
task.
Addresses prompt appropriately and establishes a position but focus is
uneven.
D: Addresses additional demands superficially.
Addresses prompt appropriately and maintains a clear, steady focus. Provides a
generally convincing position.
D: Addresses additional demands sufficiently
Addresses all aspects of prompt appropriately with a consistently strong focus and
convincing position.
D: Addresses additional demands with thoroughness and makes a connection to
claim.
Controlling Idea
Attempts to establish a claim but lacks a clear purpose.
Establishes a claim. Establishes a credible claim. Establishes and maintains a substantive and
credible claim or proposal.
Reading/ Research
Attempts to reference reading materials to develop response but lacks connections or relevance to
the purpose of the prompt.
Presents information from reading materials relevant to the purpose of
the prompt with minor lapses in accuracy or completeness.
Accurately presents details from reading materials relevant to the purpose of the prompt to develop argument or claim.
Accurately and effectively presents important
details from reading materials to develop argument or claim.
Development
Attempts to provide details in response to the prompt but lacks
sufficient development or relevance to the purpose of the prompt.
Presents appropriate details to support and develop the focus, controlling idea, or claim, with minor lapses in the reasoning,
examples, or explanations.
Presents appropriate and sufficient details to support and develop the focus,
controlling idea, or claim.
Presents thorough and detailed information to effectively support and develop the focus,
controlling idea, or claim.
Organization Attempts to organize ideas but lacks
control of structure.
Uses an appropriate organizational structure for development of
reasoning and logic, with minor lapses in structure and/or
coherence.
Maintains an appropriate organizational structure to address specific requirements
of the prompt. Structure reveals the reasoning and logic of the argument.
Maintains an organizational structure that intentionally and effectively enhances the presentation of information as required by
the specific prompt. Structure enhances development of the reasoning and logic of the
argument.
Conventions
Attempts to demonstrate standard English conventions but lacks
cohesion and control of grammar, usage, mechanics, language and tone. Sources are used without
citation.
Demonstrates an uneven command of standard English conventions and
cohesion.
Uses language and tone with some inaccurate, inappropriate, or uneven
features. Inconsistently cites sources.
Demonstrates a command of standard English conventions and cohesion with few
errors. Response includes language and tone appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt.
Cites sources using appropriate format with only minor errors.
Demonstrates and maintains a well-developed command of standard English
conventions and cohesion with few errors. Response includes language and tone
consistently appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Consistently cites sources using
appropriate format.
Content Understanding
Attempts to include disciplinary content in argument but
understanding of content is weak; content is irrelevant, inappropriate,
or inaccurate.
Briefly notes disciplinary content relevant to the prompt; shows basic
or uneven understanding of content; minor errors in
explanation.
Accurately presents disciplinary content relevant to the prompt with sufficient
explanations that demonstrate understanding.
Integrates relevant and accurate disciplinary
content with thorough explanations that demonstrate in-depth understanding.
55% 30% 5% 10%
16% 47% 37%
Step 1:Determine
needs
Step 2:Create specific learning goals based on pre-assessment
Step 3:Create and implement
teaching and learning
strategies
Step 4:Monitor student progress through ongoing
formative assessment
Step 5:Determine whether students
achieved the goals
After identifying the Enduring
Skills, decide on the appropriate measurement. (Consider - Is
writing an appropriate method of
measurement for the
identified skill?)
Use the LDC template tasks
to create a classroom
assessment as part of the
baseline data. NOTE: This
writing product is evidence of what students
can do independently.
After analyzing classroom
assessment results, use that data to inform module and/or
mini-tasks design -
specifically, Section 2 (What
Skills?) and Section 3 (What
Instruction?).
During module implementation
, formative assessment
data will inform instructional
decisions. Build in additional
assessments for evidence of students’ abilities to
independently apply learning.
Use a classroom
assessment for summative SGG data for the enduring skill. (An LDC template task
may be used for the assessment
task.)
Student Growth Process
Literacy Design Collaborative Framework
For the 2014-2015 school year, my 6th grade gifted and talented students will improve their ability to write arguments with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Each student will improve by one performance level in reading/research and development areas of the LDC argumentation writing rubricand 75% of the students will score at the level 3 (meets expectations/proficiency) on that rubric.23
Specific growth need
Proficiency Measure
Specific growth measure
Time Interval
Step 1:Determine
needs
Step 2:Create specific learning goals based on pre-assessment
Step 3:Create and implement
teaching and learning
strategies
Step 4:Monitor student progress through ongoing
formative assessment
Step 5:Determine whether students
achieved the goals
After identifying the Enduring
Skills, decide on the appropriate measurement. (Consider - Is
writing an appropriate method of
measurement for the
identified skill?)
Use the LDC template tasks
to create a classroom
assessment as part of the
baseline data. NOTE: This
writing product is evidence of what students
can do independently.
After analyzing classroom
assessment results, use that data to inform module and/or
mini-tasks design -
specifically, Section 2 (What
Skills?) and Section 3 (What
Instruction?).
During module implementation
, formative assessment
data will inform instructional
decisions. Build in additional
assessments for evidence of students’ abilities to
independently apply learning.
Use a classroom
assessment for summative SGG data for the enduring skill. (An LDC template task
may be used for the assessment
task.)
Student Growth Process
Literacy Design Collaborative Framework
LDC ModulesLDC Optional DemandsAnecdotal RecordsLDC Mini-TasksLDC Big Task Bank
Monitoring Student Progress
Monitoring Student Progress
Monitoring – What & Why
What - Monitor both* student progress toward
goal attainment * strategy effectiveness
through formative assessment processes.
Why - Adjust strategies and instruction as needed, while maintaining the goal.
Establishing baseline with LDC Task
Teaching modules throughout the year
Monitoring Progress Instructional ImplicationsAdjusting instruction to meet student needs
LDC Modules
11 Optional Demands
Listed on p.6
Anecdotal RecordsStudent A Student B
Baseline Task Areas of Weakness Performance Tasks Areas of Strength Collaboration CER Mini-Tasks Comprehension issues
—ID in area of math Demands
Baseline Task Areas of Weakness Content
Understanding Development Citing Sources Reading/Research
Explore the Rich Resources in the LDC Mini-Task Library
Some examples:CER (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning)Debate Instant DebateControlling IdeaTransitionsFocused Text MarkingUnderstanding Citation Systems
LDC Big Task Bank
RI.1 (Insert optional question.) After reading _______________, write a(n) (extended response) in which you explain what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences. Use details and examples from the text to support your response.
RI.2 After reading ______________, write ______________ in which you determine the main idea of the text and explain how key details support the main idea. Include a summary of the text.
RI.9 (Insert Optional Question) After reading _________________, write________________ in which you integrate information in order to write or speak about the subject knowledgeably.
It’s what we do with data that’s
important – use it authentically to inform practice.
Engaging students in monitoring their own growth
CoreTools:www.ldc.org
30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rDLr5dcC8E
SG Process Steps 2-5 Mirror the LDC cycle
Step 2 / What Task? Step 3 / What Skills &
Instruction? Step 4 / Monitoring learning
during mini-task instruction?
Step 5 / What Results?
Teacher Reflection