Presentation to N.C. Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance Environmental...
-
Upload
clement-baker -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Presentation to N.C. Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance Environmental...
Presentation to N.C. Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance
Environmental Management Systems Development Course for Government Agencies
David L. Lester, CM, REM
Lead Technical Specialist
Environmental Protection Department
Westinghouse Savannah River Company
Aiken, South Carolina 20809
Environmental Management SystemEnvironmental Management SystemCommunication Success at Savannah RiverCommunication Success at Savannah River
2
• SRS was established in 1950
• Includes portions of Aiken, Barnwell and Allendale counties
• The land cost $19 million and includes 310 square miles
• Ellenton, Dunbarton and other towns werehome to 6000 peoplewho had to relocate
Savannah River Site (SRS) History
Savannah River Site (SRS) History
3
• Construction began February 1951
Five reactors; two separations areas; a heavy water plant; a fuel fabrication plant; and administrative facilities
• <10% land used for production
• All operations cloaked in secrecy
SRS History (cont.)SRS History (cont.)
4
Primary mission of SRS was to produce
plutonium and tritium for nuclear weapons
Cold War Missions and Programs
Cold War Missions and Programs
5
Production Process
6
Post-Cold War Missions and Programs
Post-Cold War Missions and Programs
• National Defense– replacement tritium
facility
• Nuclear Materials
Management– separation facilities– spent nuclear fuel
• Environmental
Management– waste management– environmental
remediation
7
SRS Natural Features
4,000 acres of ponds and reservoirs 300 miles of streams 35,000 acres of bottomland hardwood 530 acres of streams and waterways 5,800 acres of swamp forest 40,000 ccf of timber harvested annually 44 amphibian, 59 reptile, 255 bird, 54 animal species,
45 fish species, 1,322 species of flora Some endangered/threatened species are residents
– Southern Bald Eagle, red-cockaded woodpecker, smooth purple coneflower, Bachman’s sparrow, American alligator, shortnose sturgeon, bog spice bush
8
Regulated Activities
@ 675 environmental permits in effect 3 public drinking water systems
– 13,000 people 34 NPDES outfalls - 5,700 parameters
annually 150 stormwater outfalls - 1,200 parameters annually 30 wastewater treatment plants 28,000 Material Safety Data Sheets managed 235,000,000 pounds of chemical inventory 14,000 chemicals and chemical products used 83 line items on the EPCRA Tier II inventory
9
Waste Management
@ 270 hazardous waste accumulation areas
1.2M pounds of hazardous waste shipped annually
16 RCRA permitted treatment facilities 1M gallons of stored RCRA waste 36M gallons of stored liquid high-level waste in 49
carbon steel underground storage tanks 2M pounds of vitrified waste at Defense Waste
Processing Facility 477 waste units (1/3 closed)
10
EMS Implementation at SRS
Assumptions Process General Description and Timeline Discussion Integration with Department of Energy Safety
Management Program -- We bring ISO 14001 into Operations
Teaming Results Lessons Learned
– Identify Risks
Questions
11
Operating Assumptions and “Givens”
Assumptions– Site policy and commitment to comply with regulations is strong,
therefore maintaining good regulatory relationships– Regulations will continue to evolve and increase in complexity and
WSRC has ability to negotiate compliance schedules– Site Operations will be consistent with forecast at beginning of fiscal
year (including Environmental Restoration projects)– No dramatic change in number of permitted discharge points,
chemical usage, and permitted waste streams– No dramatic change in frequency or extent of regulatory audits– No major unplanned spills or other accidental releases with offsite
consequences
12
Implementation of ISO 14001 at SRS
Benchmark Team represented entire site (1997)– Key Decision - Implement site wide versus individual
organizations– Key Decision - Evolution versus revolution
Gap Analysis and Gap Closure Plan (1998)– Gap closure continued through implementation phase
Implementation Team - Management commitment of resources
– Key Decision - Third party certification or self-declare conformance?
Registrar “selection” (1998) Completed self-declaration and independent audit (1998)
– Key Decision - Identify cost benefits for independent certification
13
ISMSISMS
OSHA Process Safety Mgmt (PSM)
Enhanced Work Planning (EWP)
Voluntary Protection Program
(VPP)
EPA Risk Mgmt Plan (RMP)
Environmental Management
System (ISO 14001)
Chemical Manufacturers
Association (CMA) Responsible Care
Individual Safe Behaviors
14
A management system that integrates “Safety” to A management system that integrates “Safety” to encompassencompass the publicthe public all employeesall employees the environment, includingthe environment, including
waste minimizationwaste minimization pollution prevention pollution prevention
at the worker, organization, and corporate at the worker, organization, and corporate level.level.
What is the DOE Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS)?
15
Procedures
Personnel
Plant
WSRCPrograms
Each ProgramAddressed by One (or More)
Site Level Manuals
e.g. 3Q EnvironmentalCompliance,
1S Waste AcceptanceCriteria,
1Q Quality Assurance
Communication of ESH Programs into Work at SRS
ESHPrograms
Covering 20Functional Areas
Site S/RID
e.g.. EnvironmentalProtection & Waste
Management
Contractor RequirementsDefine Scope of Work
S/RID
Integrated Procedure Management SystemDevelop/Implement Controls
Conduct ofOperations
Conduct ofMaintenance &
Engineering
Conduct ofTraining
Get Work Done SafelyPerform Work
Feedback &Improvement
16
Communications within EPD - Regulatory Compliance
Environmental Laws
and Regulations,
Permits, Consent Orders
DOE OrdersEPD SMEs Review,
Comment, Negotiate,
Influence,
Interpret Requirements,
Provide Guidance,
Assess Program
Effectiveness
EPD and Matrixed
Environmental
Groups Develop
Site Policy (EMC)
Programs and Procedures
EMC and Facility
Management
Develop Execution
Strategy
EPD SMEs Provide
Field Support,
Training, Advise,
Write Reports, Assist in
Evaluating Upsets,
Assessments, Develop
Improvements,
Lessons Learned
17
Environmental Communications outside EPD - ECA Operational Support
EPD and Matrixed
Environmental
Groups Develop
Site Policy (EMC)
Programs and Procedures
EMC and Facility
Management
Develop Execution
Strategy
Field Environmental
Compliance Authorities
Work with Operating
Personnel to Include
Program Requirements
in Facility
Procedures
Facility Management
Include Specific
Environmental Requirements
in All Their Operations
Field Environmental
Compliance Authorities
Assist Operating Personnel
with Implementation,
Assess Implementation,
Provide Input for Site
Reports
18
Teaming = Synergy
Planning and preparation for normal or recurrent activities– Participate in strategic planning and activity execution
Project Teams Permit Application Development Enhanced Work Planning Technical Support and Assessment of Program Implementation Waste Management Training
– Bring global vision of environmental requirements to Operations personnel
Fill gaps between procedures and their intent Use expertise to influence right decisions
– Enhance environmental hazard awareness in the performance of Job Hazard Analyses, work planning
– Senior management involved at budget/planning stage
19
Teaming = Synergy
Help integrate Environmental Management System requirements into the operating culture
– For SRS, this meant extending application of principles and functions of ISM to activities that involve environmental protection, i.e.,
Enhanced work planning Procedure Development Management Tours Operator Rounds
– Applicability of different requirements to an operation Different Laws/Requirements depending on situation Appropriate Response actions
20
Teaming = Synergy
Hazard Analysis for unstructured activities– Help analyze hazards when “out of the box” -
Identify options and risks– Understand politics and commitments
Guidance when situation not covered by procedures
Rationale to do the environmental protection “right thing”
21
Teaming = Synergy
Help integrate Environmental Management System requirements into the operating culture (Continued)
– Normal operations that could challenge the environmental protection envelope
– Improve the application of pollution prevention, waste minimization, and energy efficiency techniques within work activities
Assist in development of workplace culture that promotes the concept of confirmed readiness to perform work and readily stops work if conditions change
Help develop clearly defined work instructions through interactions with operations and maintenance personnel
22
Success Keys
Communication that is both timely and complete– Acquire full understanding of each situation before acting
Spend time in field with affected organizations– Provide solution options, not hurdles– Include options and their risks so an informed decision can be
reached Keep discussions professional
– Eliminate hidden agendas– All one team with one purpose
“Win-Win” is the only solution that makes everyone happy Operations really wants to do the right thing
Listen and respond to the urgency– Don’t assume
23
Benchmarking Environmental Management System at SRS
First major site in DOE Complex to achieve and maintain independent certification against ISO 14001 international standard
– SRS’s program has been used to benchmark other organizations
Brookhaven National Laboratory NASA Public Works Authority of Charleston Canadian Government
Independent certification stopped in Fiscal Year 2002– Lack of progress indentifing real cost benefits– Continue to self-declare and maintain programs
(required by E. O 13148)
24
Lessons Learned
Quality of EMS “manual” Manager’s familiarity and use of EMS manual Over emphasize objectives and targets throughout organization “Limit” aspects to significant impact - define significant Use every means possible to publicize policy Clearly delineate EMS audit results - widely publicize Formalize Management Review process (procedure, schedule, etc.) Involve “communicators” Pre-audit records (training, qualifications, calibration, logbooks) Pre-audit performance indicators and tracking systems Over emphasize “management system” audit, not compliance audit Communicate, communicate, communicate, with management,
employees, subcontractors
25
Go “Out of the Box” to Identify Potential Risks
Operating Risks– Facility Shutdowns– Loss of water service (sewer, drinking, wastewater, etc.)– Loss of waste disposal capacity (landfill, LLW, etc.)– Ventilation system shutdown– Loss of ability to store material from DOE sites
Financial Risks– Fines and Penalties (unallowable costs)– Projects slower and costlier– Potential loss of new missions– Increased cost through loss of self-permitting for domestic and
sanitary sewers– Loss of Fee potential
26
More Risks
Environmental Damage/Public Health Risks– Non-availability of emergency response,
monitoring, and investigations
Customer/Public Relations Risks– New Missions jeopardized by poor compliance
record– Loss of Fee for violations and fines; unhappy
customers– Public Perception, political support at risk
27
Concluding Thoughts and Suggestions
Communication– Talk the walk and walk the talk
Best way for individual worker to think environmental protection is for them to see it practiced daily by their supervisors
– Stress more positives, but don’t downplay negatives Involvement
– Actively use environmental professionals in other programs
– Supervision needs to value the effort needed, managers set the example
28
Training/Education– Part of Continuing Training -- often and strong– Drills and practice exercises must reinforce your EMS– “Cross walk” EMS concepts into other training arenas
(maintenance, CONOPs, waste certification, safety, emergency preparedness)
Commitment– Give your people the tools they need to succeed
Self-Declare or Not?– Business Basis
– Regulator Exercise of “enforcement discretion”
Concluding Thoughts and Suggestions
29
Coincidence or Not ?
If, A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Equals, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Then,
K + N + O + W + L + E + D + G + E
11 + 14 + 15 + 23 + 12 + 5 + 4 + 7 + 5 = 96%
H + A + R + D + W + O + R + K
8 + 1 + 18 + 4 + 23 + 15 + 18 + 11 = 98%
Both are important, but the total falls just short of 100%
But,A + T + T + I + T + U + D + E
1 + 20 + 20 + 9 + 20 + 21 + 4 + 5 = 100%
30