Presentation: Progressive Sensory Disturbance · myelitis? •(1) “Owl’s eye” appearance and...
Transcript of Presentation: Progressive Sensory Disturbance · myelitis? •(1) “Owl’s eye” appearance and...
MaulikShah,MDFebruary15,2019
PatientPresentation:ProgressiveSensoryDisturbance
Inearly2018,this57year‐oldmanwassenttotheEmergencyDepartmentaftercomplainingintheoncologyclinicofprogressivesensorydeficits,subjectiveweakness,andmarkedimpairmentofgaitincludingrecurrentfalls.Hewasunabletowalkunsupportedbyhisfamilyorwithoutawalker.Hehadahistoryofmandibularsquamouscellcarcinomaandsmallcelllungcancerwithknownmetastaticdiseasetothesupratentorialbrain‐presumablyrelatedtothelatter.Hehadbeentreatedwithlocalsurgicalresectionandradiationandhadbeentreatedwithipilimumabandnivolumabstartingtwomonthspriortohospitaladmission.Ofnote,ipilimumabtargetscytotoxicT‐lymphocyte‐associatedantigen4andnivolumabtargetsprogrammeddeath‐1receptor.
Hereportsthatshortlyafterhisfirsttreatmentwithcheckpointinhibitortherapy,henotednumbnessinhislefthand.Thisprogressedslowlyinitiallyoveramonthtoinvolveleftlegaswell,butoverlastfewweeks,spreadtotherightlegandthentherighthand.Hefeltclumsyanddyscoordinatedandreportedrecurrentfallsathome.Onneurologicexamination,hehadanormalmentalstatusexambuthadawithdrawnaffectandwasvisiblyfrustratedwithhisdeficits.Hewasnotedtohavemildgutturaldysarthriaandnystagmuswithfarlateralgazeonbothsides.Hewascacheticwithreducedmusclebulkthroughoutbuthadnormaltoneandnoclearfocalmotorweakness.Hisleftandrightfingerandfoottapswereclumsyanddysrhythmicandhehaddysmetriawithfinger‐nose‐fingerandheel‐to‐shintestingonbothsides,worseontheleftcomparedtotherightside.Onsensoryexamination,hehaddiminishedpinpricksensationindistalhandsandfeetbutmoremarkedimpairmentofproprioceptionandjointpositionsenseinhisfingers,wrist,toesandankles.Deeptendonreflexeswereabsentinthearmsandlegs.Hewasunabletostandupwithoutassistance.
Laboratorywork‐upwasnotableforSIADHandmildhyponatremia.LumbarpunctureforCSFanalysisrevealedWBC30(95%lymphoctyes),glucose48,andprotein184.AnEMG/NCSstudyshowedevidenceofnon‐length‐dependentgeneralizedsensoryneuropathyversusneuronopathywithmultifocalinvolvementofthemotornervesandnerverootswithmildfeaturessuggestiveofdemyelination.MRIBrainshowedoverallimprovementintheburdenofmetastaticdisease.MRITotalSpineshowedT2hyperintensityandcordedemafromC3‐C7segments,prominentlyinvolvingthedorsalcolumnsonbothsideswithtract‐specifichomogenousenhancementwithgadoliniumcontrast,aswellasenhancementofexitingnerverootsanddorsalrootganglia.Adiagnostictestresultwasreported..
References1. FengSetal.JournalofThoracicOncology2017;12:1626‐1635.2. SpainLetal.AnnalsofOncology2017;28:377‐385.
3. KaoJCetal.JAMANeurology2017;74:1216‐1222.4. VittJRetal.Neurology2018;91:91‐93.5. HamptonCWetal.NeurolNeuroimmunolNeuroinflamm2015;2:e82.6. FlanaganEPetal.Neurology2011;76:2089‐2095.7. FlanaganEPetal.ContinuumNeurology2011;7:776‐799.8. DubeyDetal.JAMANeurology2018;epube1‐e9.9. FlanaganEPetal.AnnNeurol2017,81:298‐309.
2/11/2019
1
RAIN Conference 2019Difficult Diagnoses
Maulik Shah, MD, MHS
UCSF Neurohospitalist Division
February 15, 2019
Disclosures
• No relevant disclosures to this talk
• I am the CME quiz editor for JAMA Neurology
• I am on the board for Neurohospitalist
Rapidly progressive sensory deficits
• 57 year old man with mandibular squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer with known CNS metastatic disease presented to hospital with progressive sensory disturbance and ataxia
• Started on ipilimumab and nivolumab(checkpoint inhibitor therapy) two months prior to presentation
• Started with numbness in left hand, then to left leg, then right leg, and then right hand– Clumsiness, gait disturbance and recurrent falls– Progressed over weeks
2/11/2019
2
Case, continued
• Neurologic Examination
• Normal mental status, withdrawn affect
• Mild dysarthria, end‐gaze nystagmus
• Left > right clumsy finger taps without clear focal weakness, but diffuse cachexia
• Left and right dysmetria, arms worse than legs
• Markedly absent proprioception in fingers and wrists, in feet to level of knees
• Deep tendon reflexes absent in arms and legs
Question #1
Which of the following has been reported as a neurologic complication of checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy?
• (1) Acute demyelinating polyneuropathy• (2) Cerebellitis• (3) Limbic encephalitis• (4) Myasthenia gravis• (5) All of the above have been reported in the literature
2/11/2019
3
Checkpoint Inhibitor Neurotoxicity
• Immune‐mediated cancer therapy, the use of which has greatly expanded over last few years
• Inhibit down‐regulatory signals directed toward T cells via targets such as cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) leads to upregulation of cytotoxic T‐cell activity and tumor death
• Used for melanoma, small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and increasingly for other treatment refractory neoplasms including primary CNS malignancy
Checkpoint Inhibitor Neurotoxicity, continued
• Adverse events have included tissue/organ‐specific autoimmune‐based disease– Colitis and thyroiditis
• Neurologic complications range from 2‐5% in various case series– Rate >10% in some series of combination therapy– Often seen despite favorable response in terms of primary malignancy
• Pathophysiology unclear– Shared antigen on healthy tissue and cancer cells– Activation of underlying autoimmune disease– “Unmasking” of paraneoplastic syndrome
Checkpoint Inhibitor Neurotoxicity, continued
• Peripheral nervous system complications– Demyelinating polyneuropathy / AIDP– Myositis including necrotizing myositis– Myasthenia gravis– Vasculitis peripheral nerve disease
• Central nervous system complications– Aseptic meningitis– Encephalitis, NMDA‐receptor limbic encephalitis– Cerebellitis– Myelitis, necrotizing myelopathy
• Exacerbation of other inflammatory conditions– Radiation toxicity
2/11/2019
4
Case, continuedLabs and Work‐up
• Serum labs notable for SIADH
• EMG/NCS: Non‐length‐dependent, generalized sensory neuropathy versus neuronopathy with multifocal involvement of motor nerves and nerve roots and mild demyelinating findings
• CSF with WBC 30 (95% lymphocytes), glucose 48, and protein 184
• MRI Brain and systemic imaging showing improvement in burden of metastatic disease
2/11/2019
5
Question #2
Which of the following etiologies is of primary concern given results of diagnostic testing and MRI spine imaging?
• (1) Viral myelitis• (2) Autoimmune / paraneoplastic myelitis• (3) Metastatic disease with intramedullary involvement
• (4) Compressive spondylotic myelopathy• (5) Metabolic myelopathy
2/11/2019
6
Question #3
Which of the following MR imaging pattern of findings would be most suggestive of a paraneoplastic cause of myelitis?
• (1) “Owl’s eye” appearance and hyperintensity of anterior spinal cord
• (2) Nodular leptomeningeal and exiting nerve root enhancement
• (3) Short segment peripherally based asymmetric homogenously enhancing single lesion
• (4) Longitudinally extensive tract‐specific symmetric T2 hyperintensity and contrast enhancement on T1
2/11/2019
7
Case, continued
• CSF testing returned positive for CRMP‐5‐IgG antibody
• Treated with high‐dose IV steroids followed by oral taper
• Given lack of improvement, plasmapheresis was initiated and patient completed five exchanges
• Deficits stabilized but did not improve
• No further treatments given goals of care and patient desire to return home
CRMP‐5 Autoimmune Myelitis
• Collapsing response‐mediator protein 5– Intracellular antigen
• Associated with variety of neurologic presentations including– Peripheral neuropathy– Retinopathy, optic neuropathy– Chorea, cerebellar ataxia– Myelitis
• Associated most commonly with small cell lung cancer – Renal cell carcinoma, thymoma, seminoma, others
2/11/2019
8
Paraneoplastic Myelitis
• In one case series, most patients had longitudinally extensive myelitis with symmetric enhancement that was tract‐specific or gray matter restricted
• CSF was inflammatory with pleocytosis, unique oligoclonal bands
• Anti‐amphiphysin antibody most common, CRMP‐5 second
• Onset could occur months prior to neoplasm discovery
• Poor prognosis for recovery even with cancer therapy
Checkpoint Inhibitor Neurotoxicity Treatment
• Guidelines suggest that treatment is based on severity of neurologic symptoms
• Discontinuation of immune therapy• High dose steroids followed by oral taper• Adjunct based on disease and severity
– IVIg or plasmapheresis
• Goal may be stabilization of deficits– In one case series, 30% of patients had minimal or no significant improvement
• Role of steroid‐sparing agent– Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine
Multiple Sclerosis
Neuromyelitis optica
ADEM
SLE
MOG
Sjogren’s
Sarcoid
Vasculitis
HSV
CMV
EBV
VZV
HIV
WNV (AHC)
HTLV (not always
inflammatory)
Enterovirus 68, 71
Fungal: cocci, histo
Tuberculosis
Mycoplasma
Lyme
Syphilis
Lymphoma
Intramedullary tumors:
‐Ependymoma
‐Astrocytoma
‐Hemangioblastoma
Paraneoplastic
‐CRMP‐5
‐Amphiphysin
‐GFAP
Vascular (Ischemic)
Dural AV fistula
Vitamin B12 deficiency
Nitrous Oxide toxicity
Vitamin E deficiency
Copper deficiency
Adrenoleukodystrophy /
Adrenomyeloneuropathy
HIV vacuolar myelopathy
MRI of Spine
CSF Analysis:
Elevated WBC or
IgG index or OCB
2/11/2019
9
Patterns of Myelitis on Imaging
• There is broad differential for transverse myelitis and basic CSF results are unlikely to help discriminate between etiologies– There are now many possible antibodies and pathogens that can now be tested for
– Test results may not return for weeks
• Patterns on imaging may help narrow differential diagnosis– Focus diagnostic evaluation
– Allow for earlier initiation of empiric therapy
2/11/2019
10
Multiple Sclerosis
• Short lesions, spanning usually no more than 2 segments
• Located in periphery of spinal cord on axial sequences, often asymmetric, involving dorsal or lateral columns
• During time of acute flare, lesions enhance with gadolinium contrast
• Characteristic brain lesions– Periventricular, juxta‐cortical, infratentorial– Extending from corpus callosum
NMO Real 1
2/11/2019
11
Neuromyelitis Optica
• Associated with aquaporin‐4‐antibody
• Longitudinally extensive, 3 or more segments
• Acute flare often associated with diffuse contrast enhancement and cord edema
• On axial imaging, central cord usually involved, both gray and white matter
• Can have brain lesions– Hypothalamus, periventricular
– Area postrema, around third/fourth ventricle
Question #4
Which of the following statements is FALSE regarding imaging differences between MOG IgG myelitis and myelitis associated with multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica?
• (1) T2 signal change on axial imaging confined to gray matter in an “H” pattern was more common in MOG IgG myelitis than multiple sclerosis
• (2) Conus involvement was more common in MOG IgG myelitis than NMO
• (3) Lesions associated with acute flares of MOG IgG myelitis more frequently demonstrated contrast enhancement than acute flares of multiple sclerosis
• (4) Longitudinally extensive lesions spanning greater than 3 vertebral segments was more common in MOG IgG myelitis than multiple sclerosis
2/11/2019
12
MOG IgG Antibody Demyelination
• Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG antibody
• Found in 1/3rd of one series of aquaporin‐4‐IgG antibody negative NMO spectrum disorder patients
• More likely to present as encephalitis and have seizures than NMO or multiple sclerosis
• Acutely may present as “flaccid myelitis”
• More likely to have bilateral optic neuritis at once
• Affects younger patients on average
• Often post‐infectious in pediatric population
MOG IgG Antibody Myelitis
• Frequently longitudinally extensive, but often multiple lesions during acute flare
• Unlikely to enhance during acute flare
• More frequently (up to 30% of patients) to have exclusive gray matter involvement on axial imaging, “H” pattern
• More likely to involve the conus
• Affects younger patients on average
2/11/2019
13
2/11/2019
14
2/11/2019
15
Question #5
The pattern of abnormalities and enhancement seen within the brainstem and periventricular white matter in this patient with encephalomyelitis has been described in association with which of the following autoantibodies?
• (1) Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) antibody• (2) Double‐stranded DNA antibodies• (3) Amphiphysin antibody • (4) Aquaporin‐4 antibody (NMO)
GFAP Astrocytopathy
• Clinically presents as encephalitis or myelitis or both seizures, memory loss, psychiatric
• Over 50% of patients had “a striking pattern of linear perivascular radial gadolinium enhancement, extending outward from the ventricles– Some had similar pattern in cerebellum
– Leptomeningeal, serpentine pattern also seen
• CSF usually with pleocytosis, high protein, and with unique oligoclonal bands
2/11/2019
16
GFAP Astrocytopathy
• About 1/3 in case series had associated neoplasm– Ovarian teratoma, adenocarcinoma most common
• Some of the patients had prodromal viral illness– Some had similar pattern in cerebellum– Leptomeningeal, serpentine pattern also seen
• High percentage of co‐existing antibodies including NMDA‐receptor‐IgG and aquaporin‐4‐IgG
• Majority of patients improved with steroids– IVIg and plasmapheresis used as adjunct
• Relapses off steroids not uncommon steroid‐sparing therapy
2/11/2019
17
• Thank you for attention
• UCSF Neurohospitalist Division and Fellowship– S. Andrew Josephson– Vanja Douglas– John Betjemann– Megan Richie– Nicole Rosendale– Elan Guterman– Maulik Shah
• Transfer Center at UCSF: 415‐353‐9166