Presentation on Traumatic brain injury

25
Traumatic Brain Injury Traumatic Brain Injury Reducing Army Combat Reducing Army Combat Helmet Helmet Team 6 Team 6 Kristin Kristin Ohanian Ohanian Jim Jim Veronick Veronick Damian Damian Frankiewicz Frankiewicz Client: Denise Client: Denise Panosky Panosky University of Connecticut School of Nursing University of Connecticut School of Nursing Storrs Hall, Room 208 Storrs Hall, Room 208 231 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2026 231 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2026 Storrs, CT 06269 Storrs, CT 06269 (860) 486 (860) 486 - - 0549 0549

description

Traumatic brain injury

Transcript of Presentation on Traumatic brain injury

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Traumatic Brain Injury Reducing Army Combat Reducing Army Combat HelmetHelmet

    Team 6Team 6Kristin Kristin OhanianOhanianJim Jim VeronickVeronickDamian Damian FrankiewiczFrankiewicz

    Client: Denise Client: Denise PanoskyPanoskyUniversity of Connecticut School of NursingUniversity of Connecticut School of NursingStorrs Hall, Room 208Storrs Hall, Room 208231 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2026231 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2026Storrs, CT 06269Storrs, CT 06269(860) 486(860) 486--0549 0549

  • OutlineOutline

    BackgroundBackground Project DescriptionProject Description

    SubunitsSubunits TestingTesting

    ResultsResults Brain Injury ReductionBrain Injury Reduction Budget Budget ConclusionConclusion ReflectionReflection

  • BackgroundBackground

    Former U.S. Army soldier, now a Former U.S. Army soldier, now a UConnUConn nursing student, nursing student, suggested improvements to combat helmets after serving in suggested improvements to combat helmets after serving in Iraq.Iraq.

    Current helmets provide ballistic protection, but limited head Current helmets provide ballistic protection, but limited head trauma protectiontrauma protection

    The The TheThe New England Journal of MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine reported a study reported a study where over 15% of soldiers in Iraq suffered from Traumatic where over 15% of soldiers in Iraq suffered from Traumatic Brian Injuries (Brian Injuries (TBIsTBIs))

    TBIsTBIs are defined as sudden trauma to the brain that causes a are defined as sudden trauma to the brain that causes a varying extent of damagesvarying extent of damages

    TBIsTBIs are mainly caused by Improvised Explosive Devices are mainly caused by Improvised Explosive Devices ((IEDsIEDs), vehicle accidents, and falls.), vehicle accidents, and falls. Limited Limited TBIsTBIs resulted from bullets, shrapnel, and resulted from bullets, shrapnel, and

    fragments fragments

  • Background (cont.)Background (cont.)

    Room for improvement is greatly needed to make helmet Room for improvement is greatly needed to make helmet capable of protecting against these injuries:capable of protecting against these injuries: Padding systemPadding system More supportive/better fitMore supportive/better fit Facial protectionFacial protection

    Current Advanced Combat Helmet used by US Army

  • Project DescriptionProject Description

    Design a new helmet and Design a new helmet and padding system that padding system that provides facial protection provides facial protection and reduces the risks of and reduces the risks of TBIsTBIs

  • SubunitsSubunits

    Outer ShellOuter Shell Expanded Polystyrene LayerExpanded Polystyrene Layer Retention PaddingRetention Padding Suspension SystemSuspension System Chin GuardChin Guard

  • Chin GuardChin Guard

    Wear to protect faceWear to protect face Lift up and lock when not Lift up and lock when not

    neededneeded Made of Kevlar and has Made of Kevlar and has

    pads for comfort/fitpads for comfort/fit

  • Outer ShellOuter Shell

    Ideally, same current manufacturing process would be used to Ideally, same current manufacturing process would be used to create the outer shellcreate the outer shell

    Shape will be similar to ACHShape will be similar to ACH Slightly largerSlightly larger More protectionMore protection

    Made of Kevlar using a composite kitMade of Kevlar using a composite kit Mold for shell was made based on the shape of the ACHMold for shell was made based on the shape of the ACH

  • Outer ShellOuter Shell

    3 prototypes3 prototypes Necessary for testingNecessary for testing 1 Triangle design, 2 1 Triangle design, 2

    Pinwheel designPinwheel design

  • Padding/Impact Padding/Impact Protection SystemProtection System Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) LayerExpanded Polystyrene (EPS) Layer

    For impact protectionFor impact protection Currently used in bicycle and motorcycle helmetsCurrently used in bicycle and motorcycle helmets ReplaceableReplaceable

    Retention PaddingRetention Padding Removable for comfort and fitRemovable for comfort and fit Same pads as used in ACHSame pads as used in ACH

  • EPSEPS

    EPS layerEPS layer Cut from 14Cut from 14 cubes with heated wirecubes with heated wire Molded using sandpaperMolded using sandpaper Final thickness is 3/10Final thickness is 3/10

  • Padding/Suspension SystemPadding/Suspension System

    In order to prepare for testingIn order to prepare for testing Velcro circles added so padding can Velcro circles added so padding can

    stickstick Suspension system addedSuspension system added

    Same as used in ACHSame as used in ACH Required 4 holes to be drilled Required 4 holes to be drilled

  • TestingTesting

    TestingTesting Head form with internal Head form with internal

    accelerometer attached to accelerometer attached to helmethelmet

    Dropped at different heights to Dropped at different heights to correspond to desired final correspond to desired final velocitiesvelocities

  • ResultsResults

    Results compare acceleration (G Force) felt during impact Results compare acceleration (G Force) felt during impact velocityvelocity

    Helmets without EPS appear to increase in G Force Helmets without EPS appear to increase in G Force exponentially while helmets with EPS increase less drasticallyexponentially while helmets with EPS increase less drastically

  • ResultsResults

    Comparing ACH with pads to Prototype with padsComparing ACH with pads to Prototype with pads Both the ACH and Prototype exhibit similar trends when only Both the ACH and Prototype exhibit similar trends when only

    pads are usedpads are used

  • ResultsResults

    Comparing prototype with pads to prototype with pads and Comparing prototype with pads to prototype with pads and EPSEPS

    54% decrease at 15 ft/s (with pads and EPS)54% decrease at 15 ft/s (with pads and EPS) 33% decrease at 12 ft/s (with pads and EPS)33% decrease at 12 ft/s (with pads and EPS)

  • ResultsResults

    EPS DegradationEPS Degradation Shows that EPS is truly the variable that reduces G ForceShows that EPS is truly the variable that reduces G Force EPS begins to degrade after several hits and the results EPS begins to degrade after several hits and the results

    show higher accelerationsshow higher accelerations Military replaces helmets after one major impact so this is Military replaces helmets after one major impact so this is

    not a hindrancenot a hindrance

  • Brain Injury ReductionBrain Injury Reduction

    We know that the prototype decreases impact forcesWe know that the prototype decreases impact forces How does this affect brain injury reduction?How does this affect brain injury reduction?

    Brain injury diagnosis is observationalBrain injury diagnosis is observational Glasgow Coma Scale classifies Mild, Moderate, or Severe Glasgow Coma Scale classifies Mild, Moderate, or Severe

    injury based on victiminjury based on victims verbal, motor, and eye reactions s verbal, motor, and eye reactions to stimulito stimuli

    Comparison of qualitative results with quantitative data is Comparison of qualitative results with quantitative data is difficult and unclassifieddifficult and unclassified

  • Brain Injury ReductionBrain Injury Reduction

    There is no real effective way to say that There is no real effective way to say that x amount of forces x amount of forces reduced produces a y increase in the GCI.reduced produces a y increase in the GCI.

    The relationship is much more complicated than a simple oneThe relationship is much more complicated than a simple one--toto--one relationship, such as one relationship, such as an x percentage of forces an x percentage of forces reduces an x percentage of brain injuriesreduces an x percentage of brain injuries when a force impacts a helmet even at a single point, it when a force impacts a helmet even at a single point, it

    sends a wave of energy throughout the entire head that sends a wave of energy throughout the entire head that emanates from the pointemanates from the point

  • Brain Injury ReductionBrain Injury Reduction

    We can look at medical definitions of brain injuries to We can look at medical definitions of brain injuries to determine their causesdetermine their causes Countercoup effectCountercoup effect

    Causes the brain to hit the skull and rock back and Causes the brain to hit the skull and rock back and forthforth

    Caused by inertia, which is largely tied into the Caused by inertia, which is largely tied into the initial impactinitial impact

    Although there are no studies to mathematically equate force Although there are no studies to mathematically equate force reduction to brain injury reduction, reduction to brain injury reduction, such a large decrease such a large decrease in impact force will logically decrease brain injury in impact force will logically decrease brain injury probabilityprobability by a statistically significant marginby a statistically significant margin

  • Budget Budget

    ACH ACH donateddonated Motocross HelmetMotocross Helmet donateddonated Shell mold & componentsShell mold & components $880.69$880.69 Padding/suspension systemPadding/suspension system donateddonated Foam cutting suppliesFoam cutting supplies $130.58$130.58 EPS Foam PackEPS Foam Pack $122.12$122.12 Miscellaneous suppliesMiscellaneous supplies $81.21$81.21 Testing costTesting cost $600$600 TotalTotal.... $1800$1800

    Cost of product:Cost of product: $420$420

  • ConclusionConclusion

    The results show that the combination of EPS and the retention The results show that the combination of EPS and the retention padding system reduces G Force significantly compared to the padding system reduces G Force significantly compared to the previous helmet model resulting in reduction of TBI riskprevious helmet model resulting in reduction of TBI risk

    The helmet:The helmet: Provides a stable, comfortable, and secure fitProvides a stable, comfortable, and secure fit Provides facial protectionProvides facial protection Is suitable for fast action situationsIs suitable for fast action situations

  • Reflection

    Future changes: Have a specific, machine-manufactured EPS shell and chin

    guard made for precise fitting rather than shaping by hand Design EPS differently so neck guard can move

  • AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

    Denise Denise PanoskyPanosky & Gregory & Gregory LutkusLutkus, , UConnUConn School of NursingSchool of Nursing Shawn Thomas, Team WendyShawn Thomas, Team Wendy Dr. Theresa HennesseyDr. Theresa Hennessey Richard Long, Richard Long, GentexGentex CorporationCorporation David David PallerPaller & Ryan Rich, RIH Orthopedic Foundation& Ryan Rich, RIH Orthopedic Foundation Dave PriceDave Price Dr. Dr. EnderleEnderle

  • Questions?Questions?

    Traumatic Brain Injury Reducing Army Combat HelmetOutlineBackgroundBackground (cont.)Project DescriptionSubunitsChin GuardOuter ShellOuter ShellPadding/Impact Protection SystemEPSPadding/Suspension SystemTestingResultsResultsResultsResultsBrain Injury ReductionBrain Injury ReductionBrain Injury ReductionBudget ConclusionReflectionAcknowledgementsQuestions?