Presentation, Jennifer Hunt, September 24, 2014 · 2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers...
Transcript of Presentation, Jennifer Hunt, September 24, 2014 · 2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers...
FEMALE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION:SLACK AND REFORM
Jennifer Hunt
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Microeconomic AnalysisDepartment of the Treasury
September 24, 2014
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 1 / 16
FACTS
FEMALE LFP HAS PEAKED AFTER LONG INCREASE
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
ShadedareasindicateUSrecessions-2014research.stlouisfed.org
Source:U.S.DepartmentofLabor:BureauofLaborStatistics
LaborForceParticipationRate-Women
(Percent)
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 2 / 16
FACTS
US IS LOSING GROUND RELATIVE TO OTHER COUNTRIES
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 3 / 16
FACTS
WE KNOW A FEW THINGS ABOUT THE DECLINE
1 Youth LFP is falling for both men/women
Participation is falling among students (trend)Enrollment is increasing
2 Baby boomers hit early retirement age as recession began
3 To avoid enrollment/retirement effects, look by age
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 4 / 16
FACTS
WE KNOW A FEW THINGS ABOUT THE DECLINE
1 Youth LFP is falling for both men/womenParticipation is falling among students (trend)
Enrollment is increasing
2 Baby boomers hit early retirement age as recession began
3 To avoid enrollment/retirement effects, look by age
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 4 / 16
FACTS
WE KNOW A FEW THINGS ABOUT THE DECLINE
1 Youth LFP is falling for both men/womenParticipation is falling among students (trend)Enrollment is increasing
2 Baby boomers hit early retirement age as recession began
3 To avoid enrollment/retirement effects, look by age
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 4 / 16
FACTS
WE KNOW A FEW THINGS ABOUT THE DECLINE
1 Youth LFP is falling for both men/womenParticipation is falling among students (trend)Enrollment is increasing
2 Baby boomers hit early retirement age as recession began
3 To avoid enrollment/retirement effects, look by age
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 4 / 16
FACTS
WE KNOW A FEW THINGS ABOUT THE DECLINE
1 Youth LFP is falling for both men/womenParticipation is falling among students (trend)Enrollment is increasing
2 Baby boomers hit early retirement age as recession began
3 To avoid enrollment/retirement effects, look by age
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 4 / 16
FACTS
LFP IS FALLING AMONG THE PRIME–AGED 25–54
1980
1990
2000
2013
020
4060
80
16-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65+Age Group
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 5 / 16
FACTS
AMONG PRIME–AGED WOMEN 25-54, US LOOKS WORSE
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 6 / 16
FACTS
MANY MORE NON–US WOMEN WORKERS PART-TIME
Canada
France
Germany
Sweden
U.K.
United States
1020
3040
50
1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2013Year
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 7 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due to
Sharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recession
Smaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000
US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008
Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recession
Smaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000
US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recession
Smaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000
US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recession
Smaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000
US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recessionSmaller, later baby boom in UK
LFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000
US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recessionSmaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000
US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recessionSmaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000
US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recessionSmaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been falling
Newest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recessionSmaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohorts
In UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK HAS CAUGHT UP WITH US ON LFP AGE 16+
1 Sudden recent convergence in 16+ is due toSharpened US fall since 2008Continued upward UK trend
2 Sharpened US fall is due to baby boomers retiring, recessionSmaller, later baby boom in UKLFP in UK mysteriously unaffected by recession
3 But US/UK prime–age LFPs have diverged since 2000US LFPs for women in 30s, 40s have been fallingNewest US cohorts work no more then earlier cohortsIn UK the opposite
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 8 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
UK AGE–SPECIFIC FEMALE LFPS 2000, 2014
2000
2013
020
4060
80
16-17 18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65+Age Group
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 9 / 16
COMPARISON WITH UNITED KINGDOM
US VS UK AGE–SPECIFIC FEMALE LFPS
U.K.
U.S.
020
4060
80
16-17 18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65+Age Group
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 10 / 16
ANALYSIS
SO WHY IS LFP FALLING FOR US WOMEN IN 30S, 40S?
1 Rise in 1990s was due to
Unusually strong GDP growth, combined withExpansion of EITCTying of welfare to work (TANF)
2 Perhaps will not return to peak in absence of such growth?
But then how do other countries have a higher LFP?
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 11 / 16
ANALYSIS
SO WHY IS LFP FALLING FOR US WOMEN IN 30S, 40S?
1 Rise in 1990s was due toUnusually strong GDP growth, combined with
Expansion of EITCTying of welfare to work (TANF)
2 Perhaps will not return to peak in absence of such growth?
But then how do other countries have a higher LFP?
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 11 / 16
ANALYSIS
SO WHY IS LFP FALLING FOR US WOMEN IN 30S, 40S?
1 Rise in 1990s was due toUnusually strong GDP growth, combined withExpansion of EITC
Tying of welfare to work (TANF)
2 Perhaps will not return to peak in absence of such growth?
But then how do other countries have a higher LFP?
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 11 / 16
ANALYSIS
SO WHY IS LFP FALLING FOR US WOMEN IN 30S, 40S?
1 Rise in 1990s was due toUnusually strong GDP growth, combined withExpansion of EITCTying of welfare to work (TANF)
2 Perhaps will not return to peak in absence of such growth?
But then how do other countries have a higher LFP?
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 11 / 16
ANALYSIS
SO WHY IS LFP FALLING FOR US WOMEN IN 30S, 40S?
1 Rise in 1990s was due toUnusually strong GDP growth, combined withExpansion of EITCTying of welfare to work (TANF)
2 Perhaps will not return to peak in absence of such growth?
But then how do other countries have a higher LFP?
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 11 / 16
ANALYSIS
SO WHY IS LFP FALLING FOR US WOMEN IN 30S, 40S?
1 Rise in 1990s was due toUnusually strong GDP growth, combined withExpansion of EITCTying of welfare to work (TANF)
2 Perhaps will not return to peak in absence of such growth?But then how do other countries have a higher LFP?
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 11 / 16
ANALYSIS
WHY DO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE HIGHER LFP 30–50?
1 Seems other countries draw in women to work part-time with
Paid parental leaveSubsidized child careOther family–friendly policiesTaxation at individual, not family, level
2 So probably some slack in US female LFP, but not much
Confirm by eyeballing prime–age LFP trend
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 12 / 16
ANALYSIS
WHY DO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE HIGHER LFP 30–50?
1 Seems other countries draw in women to work part-time withPaid parental leave
Subsidized child careOther family–friendly policiesTaxation at individual, not family, level
2 So probably some slack in US female LFP, but not much
Confirm by eyeballing prime–age LFP trend
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 12 / 16
ANALYSIS
WHY DO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE HIGHER LFP 30–50?
1 Seems other countries draw in women to work part-time withPaid parental leaveSubsidized child care
Other family–friendly policiesTaxation at individual, not family, level
2 So probably some slack in US female LFP, but not much
Confirm by eyeballing prime–age LFP trend
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 12 / 16
ANALYSIS
WHY DO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE HIGHER LFP 30–50?
1 Seems other countries draw in women to work part-time withPaid parental leaveSubsidized child careOther family–friendly policies
Taxation at individual, not family, level
2 So probably some slack in US female LFP, but not much
Confirm by eyeballing prime–age LFP trend
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 12 / 16
ANALYSIS
WHY DO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE HIGHER LFP 30–50?
1 Seems other countries draw in women to work part-time withPaid parental leaveSubsidized child careOther family–friendly policiesTaxation at individual, not family, level
2 So probably some slack in US female LFP, but not much
Confirm by eyeballing prime–age LFP trend
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 12 / 16
ANALYSIS
WHY DO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE HIGHER LFP 30–50?
1 Seems other countries draw in women to work part-time withPaid parental leaveSubsidized child careOther family–friendly policiesTaxation at individual, not family, level
2 So probably some slack in US female LFP, but not much
Confirm by eyeballing prime–age LFP trend
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 12 / 16
ANALYSIS
WHY DO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE HIGHER LFP 30–50?
1 Seems other countries draw in women to work part-time withPaid parental leaveSubsidized child careOther family–friendly policiesTaxation at individual, not family, level
2 So probably some slack in US female LFP, but not muchConfirm by eyeballing prime–age LFP trend
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 12 / 16
ANALYSIS
US FEMALE PRIME–AGE LFP 25–5468
7072
7476
1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2013Year
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 13 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can
2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 Examples
Paid parental leavePaid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedulesQuality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family
3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 Examples
Paid parental leavePaid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedulesQuality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 Examples
Paid parental leavePaid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedulesQuality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 Examples
Paid parental leavePaid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedulesQuality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 ExamplesPaid parental leave
Paid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedulesQuality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 ExamplesPaid parental leavePaid sickness–related leave
Flexible schedulesQuality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 ExamplesPaid parental leavePaid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedules
Quality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 ExamplesPaid parental leavePaid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedulesQuality pre–school education
Childcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
ADMINISTRATION OBJECTIVES
FAMILY–FRIENDLY WORKPLACES
1 Remove obstacles so those who want to work can2 Allow work to be combined with family3 Design policies to include men as well as women
4 ExamplesPaid parental leavePaid sickness–related leaveFlexible schedulesQuality pre–school educationChildcare
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 14 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.Figure 2: Conference Board.Figure 3: BLS.Figure 4: ILO.Figure 5: OECD.Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.
Figure 2: Conference Board.Figure 3: BLS.Figure 4: ILO.Figure 5: OECD.Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.Figure 2: Conference Board.
Figure 3: BLS.Figure 4: ILO.Figure 5: OECD.Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.Figure 2: Conference Board.Figure 3: BLS.
Figure 4: ILO.Figure 5: OECD.Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.Figure 2: Conference Board.Figure 3: BLS.Figure 4: ILO.
Figure 5: OECD.Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.Figure 2: Conference Board.Figure 3: BLS.Figure 4: ILO.Figure 5: OECD.
Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.Figure 2: Conference Board.Figure 3: BLS.Figure 4: ILO.Figure 5: OECD.Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.
Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
SOURCES
1 Sources for figure data
Figure 1: BLS and St. Louis Fed.Figure 2: Conference Board.Figure 3: BLS.Figure 4: ILO.Figure 5: OECD.Figure 6: US– BLS. UK – Office for National Statistics.Figure 7: BLS.
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 15 / 16
END MATERIAL
REFERENCES
1 Benito, A. and P. Bunn. “Understanding Labour Force Participation in theUnited Kingdom". Bank of England Quarterly Review, Q1 2011.
2 Blau, F. and L. Kahn. “Female Labor Supply: Why is the US FallingBehind?". NBER Working Paper 18702, January 2013.
3 Council of Economic Advisers. “Jobs, Workers and Skills". Chapter 4 ofEconomic Report of the President 2013.
4 Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri and G. Vandenbroucke. “The Baby Boomand Baby Bust". American Economic Review, March 2005.
5 Juhn, C. and S. Potter. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in theUnited States". Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2006.
6 Office for National Statistics. “Population Trends". Winter 2008.7 Wells Fargo. “Labor Force Participation: A Cross–Country Analysis".
June 2014.www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Labor_Force_Participation_A_Cross-Country_Analysis_06132014.pdf
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 16 / 16
END MATERIAL
REFERENCES
1 Benito, A. and P. Bunn. “Understanding Labour Force Participation in theUnited Kingdom". Bank of England Quarterly Review, Q1 2011.
2 Blau, F. and L. Kahn. “Female Labor Supply: Why is the US FallingBehind?". NBER Working Paper 18702, January 2013.
3 Council of Economic Advisers. “Jobs, Workers and Skills". Chapter 4 ofEconomic Report of the President 2013.
4 Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri and G. Vandenbroucke. “The Baby Boomand Baby Bust". American Economic Review, March 2005.
5 Juhn, C. and S. Potter. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in theUnited States". Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2006.
6 Office for National Statistics. “Population Trends". Winter 2008.7 Wells Fargo. “Labor Force Participation: A Cross–Country Analysis".
June 2014.www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Labor_Force_Participation_A_Cross-Country_Analysis_06132014.pdf
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 16 / 16
END MATERIAL
REFERENCES
1 Benito, A. and P. Bunn. “Understanding Labour Force Participation in theUnited Kingdom". Bank of England Quarterly Review, Q1 2011.
2 Blau, F. and L. Kahn. “Female Labor Supply: Why is the US FallingBehind?". NBER Working Paper 18702, January 2013.
3 Council of Economic Advisers. “Jobs, Workers and Skills". Chapter 4 ofEconomic Report of the President 2013.
4 Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri and G. Vandenbroucke. “The Baby Boomand Baby Bust". American Economic Review, March 2005.
5 Juhn, C. and S. Potter. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in theUnited States". Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2006.
6 Office for National Statistics. “Population Trends". Winter 2008.7 Wells Fargo. “Labor Force Participation: A Cross–Country Analysis".
June 2014.www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Labor_Force_Participation_A_Cross-Country_Analysis_06132014.pdf
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 16 / 16
END MATERIAL
REFERENCES
1 Benito, A. and P. Bunn. “Understanding Labour Force Participation in theUnited Kingdom". Bank of England Quarterly Review, Q1 2011.
2 Blau, F. and L. Kahn. “Female Labor Supply: Why is the US FallingBehind?". NBER Working Paper 18702, January 2013.
3 Council of Economic Advisers. “Jobs, Workers and Skills". Chapter 4 ofEconomic Report of the President 2013.
4 Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri and G. Vandenbroucke. “The Baby Boomand Baby Bust". American Economic Review, March 2005.
5 Juhn, C. and S. Potter. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in theUnited States". Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2006.
6 Office for National Statistics. “Population Trends". Winter 2008.7 Wells Fargo. “Labor Force Participation: A Cross–Country Analysis".
June 2014.www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Labor_Force_Participation_A_Cross-Country_Analysis_06132014.pdf
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 16 / 16
END MATERIAL
REFERENCES
1 Benito, A. and P. Bunn. “Understanding Labour Force Participation in theUnited Kingdom". Bank of England Quarterly Review, Q1 2011.
2 Blau, F. and L. Kahn. “Female Labor Supply: Why is the US FallingBehind?". NBER Working Paper 18702, January 2013.
3 Council of Economic Advisers. “Jobs, Workers and Skills". Chapter 4 ofEconomic Report of the President 2013.
4 Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri and G. Vandenbroucke. “The Baby Boomand Baby Bust". American Economic Review, March 2005.
5 Juhn, C. and S. Potter. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in theUnited States". Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2006.
6 Office for National Statistics. “Population Trends". Winter 2008.7 Wells Fargo. “Labor Force Participation: A Cross–Country Analysis".
June 2014.www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Labor_Force_Participation_A_Cross-Country_Analysis_06132014.pdf
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 16 / 16
END MATERIAL
REFERENCES
1 Benito, A. and P. Bunn. “Understanding Labour Force Participation in theUnited Kingdom". Bank of England Quarterly Review, Q1 2011.
2 Blau, F. and L. Kahn. “Female Labor Supply: Why is the US FallingBehind?". NBER Working Paper 18702, January 2013.
3 Council of Economic Advisers. “Jobs, Workers and Skills". Chapter 4 ofEconomic Report of the President 2013.
4 Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri and G. Vandenbroucke. “The Baby Boomand Baby Bust". American Economic Review, March 2005.
5 Juhn, C. and S. Potter. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in theUnited States". Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2006.
6 Office for National Statistics. “Population Trends". Winter 2008.
7 Wells Fargo. “Labor Force Participation: A Cross–Country Analysis".June 2014.www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Labor_Force_Participation_A_Cross-Country_Analysis_06132014.pdf
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 16 / 16
END MATERIAL
REFERENCES
1 Benito, A. and P. Bunn. “Understanding Labour Force Participation in theUnited Kingdom". Bank of England Quarterly Review, Q1 2011.
2 Blau, F. and L. Kahn. “Female Labor Supply: Why is the US FallingBehind?". NBER Working Paper 18702, January 2013.
3 Council of Economic Advisers. “Jobs, Workers and Skills". Chapter 4 ofEconomic Report of the President 2013.
4 Greenwood, J., A. Seshadri and G. Vandenbroucke. “The Baby Boomand Baby Bust". American Economic Review, March 2005.
5 Juhn, C. and S. Potter. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in theUnited States". Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 2006.
6 Office for National Statistics. “Population Trends". Winter 2008.7 Wells Fargo. “Labor Force Participation: A Cross–Country Analysis".
June 2014.www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Labor_Force_Participation_A_Cross-Country_Analysis_06132014.pdf
JENNIFER HUNT (DAS MICROECONOMICS) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 16 / 16