Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

download Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

of 21

Transcript of Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    1/21

    Debating : an introduction

    Seminar on Debate

    Central Sulawesi

    October, 19 2010

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    2/21

    Getting to know debating

    Debating is a clash of argumentations amongthe Government team and Opposition team

    Everything starts from the word motion

    Competitive debating aims to simulate aliving, breathing parliamentary debate

    The soul of debating is to argue on policies, or

    propositions of thought; good or bad,effective or not effective, useful or useless

    Who shouts the loudest does not win!

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    3/21

    Competitive Debating 101

    Situated in tournaments; competition of

    supremacy among teams

    The many formats; British Parliamentary,World Schools, Asian Parliamentary,

    Australasian Parliamentary -> the generally

    used formats

    Winners of a debate is determined by a or a

    team of adjudicator(s)

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    4/21

    Competitive Debating 102

    Motion release; prepared and impromptu

    Liason Officers; chairperson and timekeepers

    Casebuilding time; a 30 minute preparationtime for team members only! Printed

    materials are the only source of reference

    allowed, no electronics.

    Government team casebuilds inside the room,

    Opposition team casebuilds outside the room.

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    5/21

    Competitive Debating 103

    Except for British Parliamentary, a teamcomprises of 3 (three) debaters who would playthe role of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd speakers

    A reply speaker closes the case for each team;this role can only be assumed by either the 1st

    and/or 2nd speaker

    Each substantive speaker (1st to 3rd) is allowed thesame duration of floor time, some formats withPOI times (contd in slide 15)

    A reply speaker is usually given between 3 to 4minutes to conclude the teams case

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    6/21

    Competitive Debating 104 :

    The map of chronologies

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    7/21

    What it looks like

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    8/21

    Keywords nice to take note of by now..

    Motion

    Casebuilding

    Speaker roles Government/Positive/Proposition team

    Opposition/Negative/Refuting team

    Tournament format

    Adjudicators

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    9/21

    World Style System It is a system applied in WSDC thus implemented also in

    NSDC

    World Style debate put emphasis on the philosophical

    argumentation instead of the practical one.

    The job of affirmative team is to propose that there is a

    (or some) significant underlying principle(s) to supportthe motion reflected through the team stance

    Meanwhile the oppositions job is to provide negation to

    the particular stance. The main job of negative is to

    simply proof that affirmative team is wrong. It is notimperative for negative to provide a solution.

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    10/21

    Depth of Debating 101

    MOTION

    Is the topic, a full propositional statement that stateswhat the debate is/shall be about

    Usually proposes a policy, against the status quo, oraffirming the virtue (goodness) of a state or condition

    A Government team must defend the motion, and theopposition team must negate the motion -> in a

    nutshell what competitive debating is aboutEXAMPLE : This house would oblige Developed Nations to

    grant development aids to the Developing Countries.

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    11/21

    Depth of Debating 102.1

    Definition

    Is a need to clarify what the debate is specificallyabout, per keyword of motion if necessary. But it

    is not a dictionary explanation of per wordmeaning. But what room of debate the wordsformulate.

    Scopes down a motion; to achieve a mutualagreement among both teams on theinterpretation of the motion thus the entry pointfor a debate -> room of debate

    A Government team holds the right to determineand offer the definition of a debate, while the

    opposition can accept, broaden or challenge the

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    12/21

    Depth of Debating 102.2

    A definition is ideal if :

    Provides interpretation of a motion that is logicaland acceptable by common sense

    It is simply aimed to clarify the debate from themotion wording

    In setting a definition there should be room foropposition to negate the debate

    Examples of reasonable vs unreasonabledefinition.

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    13/21

    Depth of Debating 103.1

    ARGUMENTS

    Are points of view that supports the teamstance (support/refute)

    It must be logical and make sense

    Structure (the AREL theory)

    1. Assertion

    2. Reasoning3. Evidence/Example

    4. Link Back

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    14/21

    Depth of Debating 103.2

    Argument Management

    Pool of arguments should be evenly and

    strategically spread between the 1st

    and 2nd

    speakers.

    Arguments should be consistent within the

    teams main stance (theme/team line).

    The workload of each speaker is distributed

    and is called team split.

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    15/21

    Depth of Debating 104

    REBUTTALS

    Are responses on your opponents arguments

    Its not as simple as accusing things

    Simply saying your oppositions arguments areinferior does not constitute a good rebuttal

    Rebuttals must logically explain and analyze the

    weaknesses of an argument

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    16/21

    Depth of Debating 105

    Points of Information (POI)

    Allowance to briefly interrupt a standing speaker

    Stand up, raise hand, and offer your POI

    Standing speaker has absolute right toaccept/deny your POI

    If given permission to POI, the maximum time is

    15 seconds, so be concise! POI barging is a bad strategy for a team to do and

    can be penalized!

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    17/21

    Depth of Debating 106

    CASE of a team

    All of the above from 101-105 is the anatomy

    of the case of a team, which is practicallythe body of what the team is proposing in the

    debate

    The exciting part is that teams have mostly 30

    minutes to do all of that, except for prepared

    motions!

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    18/21

    Questions?

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    19/21

    Role of Speakers

    1st : Lays out the basic fundaments of the teamscase, including elementary argumentations

    2nd : Continues the case by responding, rebuild

    the case and provide continuity analysis ofargumentations

    3rd : Reviews the overall case of opponent andprovide a more thorough ballistics of response to

    argument. No new matter!

    Reply : Provide an overview of the debate andwhy their team deserves the debate

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    20/21

    Strategy that must not be named!!

    DEFINITIONAL CHALLENGE

    Highly not encouraged, it ends up in non-dynamicdebates

    Only when the given definition is unfair andundebatable! -> Truistic, Squirelling, Tautological,Time Place setting

    But when a challenge is needed, it becomescompulsory for the opposition team to execute!

  • 8/8/2019 Presentation for Debate CENTRAL SULAWESI

    21/21

    Questions?