Presentation for APP review to Portfolio Committee 14 April 2015.
-
Upload
cora-francis -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Presentation for APP review to Portfolio Committee 14 April 2015.
Reputation promise/mission
The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) of South Africa, exists to strengthen ourcountry’s democracy by enabling oversight, accountability and governance in the public sector through auditing, thereby building public confidence.
2
Roles and responsibilities:
Ministers/MECs Accounting officer or head of an institution (assisted by chief information officer)
Line managers Other officials
To ensure that institutions under their control set up appropriate performance information systems
Accountable for establishing and maintaining the systems to manage performance information
Accountable for establishing and maintaining the performance information processes and systems within their areas of responsibility
Responsible for capturing, collating and checking performance data relating to their activities
7
The functions of internal audit relevant to performance information and management should typically include the following:
Monitoring of internal controls relating to performance information processes
Examination of the usefulness and reliability of performance information
Review of critical performance management activities Review of compliance with laws and regulations relevant to
performance planning, management and reporting Risk management
Also refer to Treasury Regulations (TR) 3.2.11 - 3.2.12 (applicable to departments) and TR 27.2.10 -27.2.11 (applicable to public entities) for the responsibilities of the internal audit function
The functions of internal audit relevant to performance information and management should typically include the following:
Monitoring of internal controls relating to performance information processes
Examination of the usefulness and reliability of performance information
Review of critical performance management activities Review of compliance with laws and regulations relevant to
performance planning, management and reporting Risk management
Also refer to Treasury Regulations (TR) 3.2.11 - 3.2.12 (applicable to departments) and TR 27.2.10 -27.2.11 (applicable to public entities) for the responsibilities of the internal audit function
Role of internal audit
8
Annual audit of reported actual performance against Annual audit of reported actual performance against predetermined objectives, indicators and targets as predetermined objectives, indicators and targets as contained in the annual performance report contained in the annual performance report
Annual audit of reported actual performance against Annual audit of reported actual performance against predetermined objectives, indicators and targets as predetermined objectives, indicators and targets as contained in the annual performance report contained in the annual performance report
It is an integral part of the annual regularity audit process, confirming –
• compliance with related laws and regulations• usefulness of performance information• reliability of performance reporting
It is an integral part of the annual regularity audit process, confirming –
• compliance with related laws and regulations• usefulness of performance information• reliability of performance reporting
Audit of predetermined objectives defined
10
AppropriateAvoid unintended consequences and encourage service delivery improvements
AppropriateAvoid unintended consequences and encourage service delivery improvements
ReliableMust be accurate enough for its intended use and respond to
changes
ReliableMust be accurate enough for its intended use and respond to
changes
RelevantMust relate logically and directly to an aspect of the institution's mandate
RelevantMust relate logically and directly to an aspect of the institution's mandate
Well definedClear, unambiguous definition so that data will be collected consistently and will be easy to understand and use
Well definedClear, unambiguous definition so that data will be collected consistently and will be easy to understand and use
VerifiablePossible to validate the processes and systems
VerifiablePossible to validate the processes and systems
Cost-effectiveUsefulness of the indicator must justify the cost of collecting the data
Cost-effectiveUsefulness of the indicator must justify the cost of collecting the data
Good performance indicators should be:
11
SMART performance targets
SS
MM
AA
RR
TT
Nature and required level of performance can be clearly identified
Required performance can be measured
Realistic given existing capacity
Required performance is linked to achievement of goal
Time period/deadline for delivery is specified
PECIFICPECIFIC
EASURABLEEASURABLE
ELEVANTELEVANT
CHIEVABLECHIEVABLE
IME BOUNDIME BOUND
12
ValidityValidity
AccuracyAccuracy
CompletenessCompleteness
Applicable to performance management and reportingApplicable to performance management and reporting
PresentationPresentationMeasurabilityMeasurability
RelevanceRelevance
Consistency Consistency
Compliance with regulatory Compliance with regulatory requirementsrequirementsCompliance with regulatory Compliance with regulatory requirementsrequirements
UsefulnessUsefulnessUsefulnessUsefulness
ReliabilityReliabilityReliabilityReliability
Audit criteria
14
Understand and test the design and implementation of the performance management systems, processes and
relevant controls
Understand and test the design and implementation of the performance management systems, processes and
relevant controls 11
Test the measurability, relevance, presentation and consistency of planned performance information22
Audit approach
15
From the selected programmes in the APP, there were two major findings on the performance indicators and targets that were identified and reported to management.•There were 7 performance indicators that were identified to be not well defined and verifiable by the auditors.•There were 3 targets that were identified not to have been specific by the auditors.
On these two findings, management agreed with the auditors and either made the necessary changes or provided further clarity
See the attached annexure
From the selected programmes in the APP, there were two major findings on the performance indicators and targets that were identified and reported to management.•There were 7 performance indicators that were identified to be not well defined and verifiable by the auditors.•There were 3 targets that were identified not to have been specific by the auditors.
On these two findings, management agreed with the auditors and either made the necessary changes or provided further clarity
See the attached annexure
Overview of the outcome of the review and how management responded to the findings
19