Presentation at The Nordic Symposium in Tourism and Hospitality Research
-
Upload
deodat-mwesiumo -
Category
Documents
-
view
10 -
download
0
Transcript of Presentation at The Nordic Symposium in Tourism and Hospitality Research
Studying Inter-organisational Relationships in Tourism
Review of Methodological Approaches
Deodat Mwesiumoa
Nigel Halpernab
aMolde University College - Specialized University in Logistics
bOslo School of Management
Role of coordination in Tourism
Tourism industry is essentially a
coordination-intensive
Actors in the tourism industry can
hardly benefit without coordinating their
operations
Thus, the success of the industry is
highly dependent on effective
collaboration between organisations
Tourism Inter-organisational relationships
Inter-organizational relationships are
crucial for Tourism industry
Value is created, delivered and
captured through relationships
among organizations
Tourism Inter-organisational relationships (TIORs) research
TIORs is one of the important topics in
tourism research
Several studies have been conducted
on TIORs
Research programs have addressed
various aspects of TIORs
Aim of the review
To highlight methodological approaches
used in TIORs research
To identify their relative strengths and
weaknesses
To propose alternative approaches to
improve the quality of TIOR
Method
“Content analysis” of articles published
in leading tourism journals
Focus on articles that have reported
empirical research
Words representing inter-organizational
entities were used as search terms Coordination
Collaboration
Cooperation
Integration
Network
Cluster
Partnership
Source of the articles
Annals of Tourism Research (ATR)
Tourism Management (TM)
Journal of Travel Research (JTR)
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing
(JTTM)
Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality
and Tourism (SJHT)
Tourism Management Perspectives
(TMP)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
ATR TM JTR JTTM SJHT TMP
Number of articles reviewed
Number of articles reviewed
N=67
Topics covered in the reviewed articles
The reviewed articles covered various
topics which include:
Antecedents of TIORs
Patterns of TIORs
Forms of TIORs
Processes within of TIORs
Governance of TIORs
Outcomes of TIORs
Research
Unit of analysis in TIORs research
The unit of analysis is the major entity
analyzed in a study.
The reviewed articles reported research
that use one of three units of analysis:
The organization
Interorganizational dyad
Interorganizational network
Unit
of
Unit of analysis – The organization
Tour operator
Hotel
DMONTO
Travel agent
Museum
Airline
Restaurant
Unit of analysis – Interorganizational dyad
Hotels
Travel agents Y
Tour operator
Unit of analysis
e.g.
Travel agents X
DMO
Tourism actor X
Unit of analysis
Unit of analysis
Unit of analysis
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Organization Dyad Network
Number of articles reviewed
Number of articles reviewed
N=67
Methodological choices in
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Monoqualitative
method
Monoquantitative
method
Mixed method Multimethodqualitative
Multimethodquantitaive
Number of articles reviewed
Number of articles reviewed
N=67
Research strategies
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Case study Survey Archivalresearch
Mixedmethodsresearch
Number of articles reviewed
Number of articles reviewed
N=67
Data collection methods
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Mail survey Administeredquestionnaire
Personalinterview
Telephoneinterview
Secondarydata
Number of articles reviewed
Number of articles reviewed
N=67
Response rates
Response rates of survey studies
ranged from 7% to 95%
Administered questionnaire survey
lead in response rates (up to 95%)
Studies employing telephone
interview (up to 64%)
Personal interview (up to 39%)
Mail survey had the lowest response
rates (7% - 29% )
Sample sizes
Sample sizes for the reviewed
studies vary from 6 to 323,
depending on the research strategy
Mean sample size for survey studies
is 131
The mean sample size for studies
using secondary data is 142
Analytic techniques
Reliance on Univariate and bivariate
statistics: 39 (59%)
Some studies used some form of
multivariate analysis: 18 (26%)
Social Network analytic techniques:
10 (15%)
Time horizon
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Crosssectionalstudies
Longitudinalstudies
Number of articles reviewed
3
N=67
64
Use of single informant
It appears that use of single
informant is common among TIORs
studies
All of the reviewed survey studies
employed single informants for every
organization under study
Numerous and independent sources
that agree with each other, give
reasonable confidence that their
account of the matter is correct
The
informant
Measurement of constructs
Most quantitative TIORs involve
measurement of constructs
Use of single-item scales is common
among TIORs studies
Conventional measurement wisdom
strongly advocates the use of multi-
item scales
VS.
η
xx1 x2 xn
η
Common method variance
Most TIORs studies pay no attention
to the potential problem of CMV
All of the studies that employed
survey used a single sources for all
the variables in an instrument
This introduces the possibility of
systematic method bias due to the
use of a single source
Among the studies that employed
(self-report) surveys, only five
addressed CMV
x1 x2 x3 y1 y2 y3
η1 η2
Common Factor
Use different data sources
For example use archival data for
dependent variables and survey
responses independent variables
Different informants for independent
variables and dependent variables
Dependent
variables
Independent
variables
Collect data at different times
Cross-sectional surveys are believed
to be especially prone to potential
CMV bias
Collecting data at different times help
to reduce the cognitive accessibility
of the earlier responses
Dependent
variables
Independent
variables
t1 t2
Employing different scale formats
Some measurement procedures are
more likely to engender CMV bias
than others
Employing different formats and
scales for predictors versus
outcomes
In particular, surveys that employ a
single-scale format
This is because repeated contact
with a single format reduces cognitive
processing and thus encourage
“straight-line responses”
Statistical approaches (Ex Post measures)
Model specification
Partial out or control for latent CMV
F3
F2
F1
Call for more longitudinal TIORs studies
To determine how changing
properties of organizations fit into
systemic change.
To establish causal relationships
and for making reliable inferences
Experimental designs in TIORs studies
In search of reliable causal
explanations in TIORs
Field experiments vs. lab
experiments ?????
Feasibility ?????